Psychiatrists' attitudes to physical examination of new out-patients with a major depressive disorder

Assessing the physical health of psychiatric patients

Aims and method

Most medical diagnoses are made from the physical history alone. In the psychiatric literature, physical assessment usually focuses on examination rather than history. We aimed to ascertain the relative importance that trainee psychiatrists attach to the physical history and examination, and to investigate their actual method of physical assessment. The relative weight that trainees attach to physical history and examination was assessed with a postal questionnaire. Their actual practice was evaluated by reviewing a selection of case notes from patients under their care.

Results

Trainees weighted the physical examination as more important than the history in theoretical terms (P=0.02). They also indicated that they attached more importance to examination in their own practice (P=0.03). On review of the case notes, 34 (71%) of inpatients had been physically examined, but only one (2%) had evidence of a physical history.

Clinical implications

It appears that many psychiatric trainees do not adhere to the basic medical principle of taking a physical history on which to base a physical examination. ‘Blind’ examinations are unlikely to yield medical diagnoses. These findings have implications for our patients' health and psychiatric training.

Do deficits in cardiac care influence high mortality rates in schizophrenia? A systematic review and pooled analysis

We have previously documented inequalities in the quality of medical care provided to those with mental ill health but the implications for mortality are unclear. We aimed to test whether disparities in medical treatment of cardiovascular conditions, specifically receipt of medical procedures and receipt of prescribed medication, are linked with elevated rates of mortality in people with schizophrenia and severe mental illness. We undertook a systematic review of studies that examined medical procedures and a pooled analysis of prescribed medication in those with and without comorbid mental illness, focusing on those which recruited individuals with schizophrenia and measured mortality as an outcome. From 17 studies of treatment adequacy in cardiovascular conditions, eight examined cardiac procedures and nine examined adequacy of prescribed cardiac medication. Six of eight studies examining the adequacy of cardiac procedures found lower than average provision of medical care and two studies found no difference. Meta-analytic pooling of nine medication studies showed lower than average rates of prescribing evident for the following individual classes of medication; angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (n = 6, aOR = 0.779, 95% CI = 0.638-0.950, p = 0.0137), beta-blockers (n = 9, aOR = 0.844, 95% CI = 0.690-1.03, p = 0.1036) and statins (n = 5, aOR = 0.604, 95% CI = 0.408-0.89, p = 0.0117). No inequality was evident for aspirin (n = 7, aOR = 0.986, 95% CI = 0.7955-1.02, p = 0.382). Interestingly higher than expected prescribing was found for older non-statin cholesterol-lowering agents (n = 4, aOR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.04-2.32, p = 0.0312). A search for outcomes in this sample revealed ten studies linking poor quality of care and possible effects on mortality in specialist settings. In half of the studies there was significantly higher mortality in those with mental ill health compared with controls but there was inadequate data to confirm a causative link. Nevertheless, indirect evidence supports the observation that deficits in quality of care are contributing to higher than expected mortality in those with severe mental illness (SMI) and schizophrenia. The quality of medical treatment provided to those with cardiac conditions and comorbid schizophrenia is often suboptimal and may be linked with avoidable excess mortality. Every effort should be made to deliver high-quality medical care to people with severe mental illness.

Let's get physical! A study of general practitioner's referral letters to general adult psychiatry--are physical examination and investigation results included?

BACKGROUND/AIM

The authors previously conducted a survey of psychiatrists' attitudes to physical examination and investigations of out-patients. The most common reason for not performing such investigations was the expectation that they had already been undertaken by the general practitioner (GP). We decided to test this theory.

METHOD

A series of GP out-patient referral letters to general psychiatry was examined to establish whether findings from physical examination and investigations had been included.

RESULTS

One hundred and three letters were examined. None of the letters contained information relating to a physical examination. Only one in twenty had information on investigations despite 4 out of 10 patients in the sample presenting to the GP with somatic symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Details of physical examination and blood tests are not routinely included in referral letters to general psychiatry. This may lead to missed diagnoses of primary or secondary physical illness in psychiatric presentations. Unless it is clearly stated in the GP referral letter, it is unwise to assume that necessary investigations to exclude physical causes of presenting symptoms have been performed. Suggestions are made to improve communication between GPs and psychiatrists.