The impact of olanzapine on attitude to medication and quality of life in schizophrenia

Psychosocial and economic issues related to physical health in psychiatric illness

As well as the obvious medical consequences associated with physical health problems in individuals with schizophrenia, physical health problems lead to a number of psychosocial consequences--further contributing to the existing burden of schizophrenia itself. Weight gain can seriously impair quality of life through decreased functioning, social stigmatization, discrimination and potential financial consequences. However, patients with schizophrenia may be less capable of managing their weight via exercise and dietary interventions compared with the general population, and may, therefore, be more prone to non-compliance with a medication that induces weight gain. This may lead to exacerbation of the mental illness. Patients' perceptions and experience of antipsychotic treatments are also important as these can further impact on overall patient wellbeing. It is hoped that by increasing awareness of the psychosocial consequences of physical health impairment, we can move towards reducing the burden that patients face.

Pharmacological management of akathisia in combination with psychological interventions by a mental health nurse consultant

The article describes the management of akathisia by a mental health nurse (MHN) prescriber, working in partnership with the patient. A single-case design was used to evaluate this. It highlights three features: first, MHN can safely prescribe psychiatric medication in combination with concordance therapy. Second, the value base underpinning prescribing practice is partnership, honesty and choice for the patient. Finally, the pharmacological mechanism of antipsychotic medication, which contributes towards akathisia, requires further analysis.

The effects of antipsychotic treatment on quality of life of schizophrenic patients under naturalistic treatment conditions: An application of random effect regression models and propensity scores in an observational prospective trial

The study examines the effect of different types of antipsychotic treatment on the health related quality of life (HRQL) of people with schizophrenia under naturalistic outpatient treatment conditions. In a prospective study design, 307 schizophrenic patients were followed over a period of 2.5 years. HRQL, clinical characteristics, and type of antipsychotic medication were assessed five times every 6 months. HRQL was assessed by the SF-36. Random effect regression models were computed for the SF-36 mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component scores. Propensity scores were included in the regression models to reduce a possible sample selection bias. Monotherapeutic treatment with new atypical neuroleptic drugs had a more positive effect on the mental health related quality of life (MCS) in comparison to treatment with polypharmacological treatment but not with oral conventional antipsychotics. Monopharmaceutical treatment with depot-antipsychotic drugs had a more positive effect on the physical health related quality of life (PCS) in comparison to polypharmacological treatment. Study results indicate that atypical antipsychotic drugs are not superior to conventional antipsychotics with regard to the effect on QOL. However, monopharmaceutical treatment can be assumed to be more effective in improving mental and physical related QOL than polypharmaceutical treatment.

Quality of life in persons with schizophrenia in out-patient treatment with first- or second-generation antipsychotics

OBJECTIVE

Effects of first in comparison with second-generation antipsychotics on the subjective quality of life (QoL) of patients with schizophrenia under routine treatment conditions were examined.

METHOD

In a prospective naturalistic trial the QoL, social, clinical, and treatment-related characteristics and type of antipsychotic medication of 307 patients with schizophrenia (ICD-10 F 20) were assessed five times with 6-month intervals over 2.5 years. Longitudinal and cross-sectional effects of antipsychotic medication were assessed by hierarchical regression models. Selection bias was controlled by propensity scores.

RESULTS

While positive effects of first-generation antipsychotics on subjective QoL in comparison with no antipsychotic treatment were found, second-generation antipsychotics caused no better QoL than first-generation antipsychotics.

CONCLUSION

The hypothesis that second-generation in comparison with first-generation antipsychotics have a better effect on the improvement of subjective QoL of people with schizophrenia in routine out-patient treatment was not supported.