1
|
Tweed EJ, Mackay DF, Boyd KA, Brown A, Byrne T, Conaglen P, Craig P, Demou E, Graham L, Leyland AH, McMeekin N, Pell JP, Sweeting H, Hunt K. Evaluation of a national smoke-free prisons policy using medication dispensing: an interrupted time-series analysis. Lancet Public Health 2021; 6:e795-e804. [PMID: 34537108 PMCID: PMC8554387 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00163-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, smoking prevalence among people in prison custody (ie, people on remand awaiting trial, awaiting sentencing, or serving a custodial sentence) is high. In Scotland, all prisons implemented a comprehensive smoke-free policy in 2018 after a 16-month anticipatory period. In this study, we aimed to use data on medication dispensing to assess the impact of this policy on cessation support, health outcomes, and potential unintended consequences among people in prison custody. METHODS We did an interrupted time-series analysis using dispensing data for 44 660 individuals incarcerated in 14 closed prisons in Scotland between March 30, 2014, and Nov 30, 2019. We estimated changes in dispensing rates associated with the policy announcement (July 17, 2017) and full implementation (Nov 30, 2018) using seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average models. Medication categories of primary interest were treatments for nicotine dependence (as an indicator of smoking cessation or abstinence attempts), acute smoking-associated illnesses, and mental health (antidepressants). We included antiepileptic medications as a negative control. FINDINGS A 44% step increase in dispensing of treatments for nicotine dependence was observed at implementation (2250 items per 1000 people in custody per fortnight, 95% CI 1875 to 2624) due primarily to a 42% increase in dispensing of nicotine replacement therapy (2109 items per 1000 people in custody per fortnight, 1701 to 2516). A 9% step decrease in dispensing for smoking-related illnesses was observed at implementation, largely accounted for by respiratory medications (-646 items per 1000 people in custody per fortnight, -1111 to -181). No changes associated with announcement or implementation were observed for mental health dispensing or antiepileptic medications (control). INTERPRETATION Smoke-free prison policies might improve respiratory health among people in custody and encourage smoking abstinence or cessation without apparent short-term adverse effects on mental health dispensing. FUNDING National Institute of Health Research Public Health Research programme, Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office, and UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily J Tweed
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
| | - Daniel F Mackay
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kathleen A Boyd
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ashley Brown
- Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Thomas Byrne
- NHS Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Glasgow, UK
| | - Philip Conaglen
- Department of Public Health and Health Policy, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter Craig
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Evangelia Demou
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Alastair H Leyland
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola McMeekin
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Jill P Pell
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Helen Sweeting
- Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kate Hunt
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Robson D, Spaducci G, McNeill A, Yates M, Wood M, Richardson S. Fire Incidents in a Mental Health Setting: Effects of Implementing Smokefree Polices and Permitting the Use of Different Types of E-Cigarettes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E8951. [PMID: 33271985 PMCID: PMC7730299 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17238951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Comprehensive smokefree policies in health care settings can have a positive impact on patients' smoking behaviour, but implementation is impeded by concern that surreptitious smoking may increase fire incidents. We investigated the incidence of routinely reported fire and false alarm incidents in a large mental health organisation in England over an 81-month period when different elements of a smokefree policy were implemented. We used negative binomial regression models to test associations between rates of fire and false alarm incidents and three hospital smokefree policy periods with mutual adjustment for occupied bed days: (1) an indoor policy which allowed disposable e-cigarettes; (2) a comprehensive policy which allowed disposable e-cigarettes; and (3) a comprehensive policy with all e-cigarette types allowed. We identified 90 fires and 200 false alarms. Fires decreased (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17-0.72, p = 0.004) and false alarms increased (IRR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.02-2.76, p = 0.043), each by approximately two-thirds, when all e-cigarette types were allowed, after adjusting for bed occupancy and the comprehensive smokefree policy. Implementation of smokefree policies in mental health care settings that support use of all types of e-cigarettes may reduce fire risks, though measures to minimise effects of e-cigarette vapour on smoke detector systems may be needed to reduce false alarm incidents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Robson
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; (G.S.); (A.M.); (S.R.)
| | - Gilda Spaducci
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; (G.S.); (A.M.); (S.R.)
| | - Ann McNeill
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; (G.S.); (A.M.); (S.R.)
| | - Mary Yates
- South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 8AZ, UK; (M.Y.); (M.W.)
| | - Melissa Wood
- South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 8AZ, UK; (M.Y.); (M.W.)
| | - Sol Richardson
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 8AF, UK; (G.S.); (A.M.); (S.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spaducci G, McNeill A, Hubbard K, Stewart D, Yates M, Robson D. Smoking-related violence in a mental health setting following the implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free policy: A content analysis of incident reports. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2020; 29:202-211. [PMID: 31513336 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Smoke-free policies in mental health settings are important to protect health but are often impeded by staff concerns that physical violence may increase. We aimed to address the literature gap about the frequency, nature, and management of physical violence in relation to smoking. We compared the antecedents and containment of smoking-related incidents of physical violence over a two-year period, (12 months when an indoor-only smoke-free policy was in place, followed by 12 months after a new comprehensive smoke-free policy was introduced) using incident reports completed by staff in a large mental health organization in London, UK. Sixty-one smoking-related incidents occurred during the indoor-only smoke-free policy period; 32 smoking-related incidents occurred during the comprehensive smoke-free policy. We identified four antecedent categories for physical violence: i) patient request to smoke denied by staff; ii) during a supervised smoking break; iii) staff response to a patient breach of the smoke-free policy iv) asking for, trading or stealing smoking materials. The antecedent pattern changed across the two policy periods, with fewer incidents of denying a patient's request to smoke and a greater number of incidents involving staff responding to breaches occurring after the introduction of the comprehensive smoke-free policy. The prohibition of smoking breaks removed this source of violence. Timeout and PRN medication were the most common containment interventions. Understanding the context of smoking-related violence may inform clinical guidelines about its prevention and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilda Spaducci
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ann McNeill
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kathryn Hubbard
- Health Services and Population Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Duncan Stewart
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Mary Yates
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, London, UK
| | - Deborah Robson
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhong S, Guo H, Wang Y, Cook S, Chen Y, Luo C, Peng K, Wang F, Liang X, Chen H, Li Q, Zhou J, Wang X, Chen R. The experience of long-stay patients in a forensic psychiatric hospital in China: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:617. [PMID: 31477102 PMCID: PMC6721342 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4458-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Long stay in forensic psychiatric hospitals is common in patients who are defined as “not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder”. However, little is known about how these patients experience and perceive the long stay within these settings. The aim of this study is to explore the perception and needs of long-stay patients in forensic psychiatric hospitals in China. Methods In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 participants who had lived in the forensic psychiatry hospital for more than 8 years. We used thematic analysis strategies to analyse the qualitative data. Results Participants’ perceptions clustered seven themes: hopelessness, loneliness, worthlessness, low mood, sleep disturbances, lack of freedom, and lack of mental health intervention. Conclusions The views and opinions expressed by long-stay patients showed that psychological distress is prevailing in forensic psychiatric hospitals. Adequate and effective care and mental health interventions are recommended to be tailored for their special needs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4458-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoling Zhong
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Huijuan Guo
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Yuanyuan Wang
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Stephanie Cook
- Division of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
| | - Yanan Chen
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Chenyuli Luo
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Ke Peng
- The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.,School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Fanglan Wang
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaoxi Liang
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Hui Chen
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Qiguang Li
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Jiansong Zhou
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaoping Wang
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.
| | - Runsen Chen
- Department of Psychiatry of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Disorders; China National Technology Institute on Mental Disorders; Hunan Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Mental Health Institute of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. .,The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. .,Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scheeres A, Xhezo R, Julius R, Coffman R, Frisby J, Weber L, Streeter J, Leone F, Bettigole C, Lawman H. Changes in voluntary admission and restraint use after a comprehensive tobacco-free policy in inpatient psychiatric health facilities. Subst Abus 2019; 41:252-258. [PMID: 31295085 DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1635556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, predominantly due to tobacco use, are the leading causes of death among individuals with serious and persistent mental illness. However, many psychiatric health facilities do not routinely treat tobacco use disorder. The purpose of the current study was to examine the impact of implementing a tobacco-free policy in inpatient psychiatric health facilities in a large, urban setting on behavioral problems, treatment access, and tobacco treatment. Methods: Data on seclusion and restraint incidents, voluntary commitment at admission for each hospitalization episode, and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) prescriptions were collected through secondary analysis of Medicaid administrative records from baseline in January 2015 (n = 8983) to follow-up in December 2016 (n = 9685) at 14 inpatient psychiatric health facilities. Results: There were no significant changes from baseline to follow-up in odds of seclusion and restraint incidents or voluntary admission status. There was a significant increase in the odds of NRT prescriptions at both 30 and 180 days post discharge (odds ratio [OR] range = 1.58-2.09, P < .01). Conclusions: In a large, urban setting among Medicaid enrollees, implementation of a tobacco-free policy in inpatient psychiatric health facilities had no negative impact on behavioral problems or treatment access and improved access to NRT, although overall NRT use remained low. This study challenges perceptions among some providers that addressing tobacco use disorder will negatively impact treatment outcomes in individuals with serious mental illness. These findings support tobacco-free policies in psychiatric health facilities and the role of psychiatric health providers in treating tobacco use in this population, which is at high risk for tobacco-related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaka Scheeres
- Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Regina Xhezo
- Community Behavioral Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rose Julius
- Community Behavioral Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ryan Coffman
- Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jarma Frisby
- Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Luise Weber
- Community Behavioral Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Frank Leone
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cheryl Bettigole
- Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hannah Lawman
- Division of Chronic Disease Prevention, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spaducci G, Stubbs B, McNeill A, Stewart D, Robson D. Violence in mental health settings: A systematic review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2018; 27:33-45. [PMID: 29271109 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of smoke-free policies is increasingly common in mental health settings, to improve health. However, a barrier to implementing smoke-free polices is staff concern that violence will increase. We conducted a systematic review comparing the rates of violence before and after the introduction of smoke-free policies in mental health settings. Two authors searched major electronic databases. We included studies reporting the prevalence of violence (verbal and/or physical or combined) before and after the introduction of a smoke-free policy in a mental health, forensic, or addiction setting. We included 11 studies in the review. A narrative synthesis was used to describe the key results of each study. Six studies measured physical violence specifically; four reported a decrease or no change and two reported a short-term increase. Five of these six studies also measured verbal violence; two found an increase, with one of the studies reporting that this increase was temporary. Three reported a decrease in verbal violence. A further five studies evaluated the rate of combined verbal and physical violence; four reported a decrease or no change and the other an increase. We conclude that the introduction of smoke-free policies generally does not lead to an increase in violence. There is a need for more robust studies to support this finding. However, the conclusions from this review may be a step in reducing staff concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilda Spaducci
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Brendon Stubbs
- Health Services and Population Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ann McNeill
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, London, UK
| | - Duncan Stewart
- Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Debbie Robson
- Addictions Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Frazer K, McHugh J, Callinan JE, Kelleher C. Impact of institutional smoking bans on reducing harms and secondhand smoke exposure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016:CD011856. [PMID: 27230795 PMCID: PMC10164285 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011856.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking bans or restrictions can assist in eliminating nonsmokers' exposure to the dangers of secondhand smoke and can reduce tobacco consumption amongst smokers themselves. Evidence exists identifying the impact of tobacco control regulations and interventions implemented in general workplaces and at an individual level. However, it is important that we also review the evidence for smoking bans at a meso- or organisational level, to identify their impact on reducing the burden of exposure to tobacco smoke. Our review assesses evidence for meso- or organisational-level tobacco control bans or policies in a number of specialist settings, including public healthcare facilities, higher education and correctional facilities. OBJECTIVES To assess the extent to which institutional smoking bans may reduce passive smoke exposure and active smoking, and affect other health-related outcomes. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of identified studies. We contacted authors to identify completed or ongoing studies eligible for inclusion in this review. We also checked websites of state agencies and organisations, such as trial registries. Date of latest searches was 22nd June 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered studies that reported the effects of tobacco bans or policies, whether complete or partial, on reducing secondhand smoke exposure, tobacco consumption, smoking prevalence and other health outcomes, in public healthcare, higher educational and correctional facilities, from 2005 onwards.The minimum standard for inclusion was having a settings-level policy or ban implemented in the study, and a minimum of six months follow-up for measures of smoking behaviour. We included quasi-experimental studies (i.e. controlled before-and-after studies), interrupted time series as defined by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group, and uncontrolled pre- and post-ban data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two or more review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion in the review. Due to variation in the measurement of outcomes we did not conduct a meta-analysis for all of the studies included in this review, but carried out a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect meta-analysis, pooling 11 of the included studies. We evaluated all studies using a qualitative narrative synthesis. MAIN RESULTS We included 17 observational studies in this review. We found no randomized controlled trials. Twelve studies are based in hospitals, three in prisons and two in universities. Three studies used a controlled before-and-after design, with another site used for comparison. The remaining 14 studies used an uncontrolled before-and-after study design. Five studies reported evidence from two participant groups, including staff and either patients or prisoners (depending on specialist setting), with the 12 remaining studies investigating only one participant group.The four studies (two in prisons, two in hospitals) providing health outcomes data reported an effect of reduced secondhand smoke exposure and reduced mortality associated with smoking-related illnesses. No studies included in the review measured cotinine levels to validate secondhand smoke exposure. Eleven studies reporting active smoking rates with 12,485 participants available for pooling, but with substantial evidence of statistical heterogeneity (I² = 72%). Heterogeneity was lower in subgroups defined by setting, and provided evidence for an effect of tobacco bans on reducing active smoking rates. An analysis exploring heterogeneity within hospital settings showed evidence of an effect on reducing active smoking rates in both staff (risk ratio (RR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 0.64 to 0.78) and patients (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.98), but heterogeneity remained in the staff subgroup (I² = 76%). In prisons, despite evidence of reduced mortality associated with smoking-related illnesses in two studies, there was no evidence of effect on active smoking rates (1 study, RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.16).We judged the quality of the evidence to be low, using the GRADE approach, as the included studies are all observational. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found evidence of an effect of settings-based smoking policies on reducing smoking rates in hospitals and universities. In prisons, reduced mortality rates and reduced exposure to secondhand smoke were reported. However, we rated the evidence base as low quality. We therefore need more robust studies assessing the evidence for smoking bans and policies in these important specialist settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Frazer
- School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Health Sciences Centre, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sohal H, Huddlestone L, Ratschen E. Preparing for Completely Smoke-Free Mental Health Settings: Findings on Patient Smoking, Resources Spent Facilitating Smoking Breaks, and the Role of Smoking in Reported Incidents from a Large Mental Health Trust in England. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2016; 13:E256. [PMID: 26927143 PMCID: PMC4808919 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13030256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2015] [Revised: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite high smoking prevalence and excessive smoking-related morbidity and mortality among people with mental disorder compared to the general population, smoking treatment is often neglected in mental health settings. The UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) recently issued public health guidance stipulating completely smoke-free mental health settings. This project evaluated existing smoking-related practices in preparation for guidance implementation. The objectives were to: audit the recording of smoking-related information and treatment provision; explore current arrangements relating to the facilitation of patient smoking; measure staff time spent and identify costs of facilitating smoking; and explore the role of smoking in smoking-related incidents. METHODS A mixed-methods study was conducted across four acute adult mental health wards, accommodating 16 patients each, over six months. It included a case-note audit, on-site observations, and a qualitative content analysis of incident reports. RESULTS Smoking status was recorded for less than half of the 290 patients admitted (138, 48%). Of those, 98 (71%) were recorded as current smokers, of whom 72 (74%) had received brief smoking cessation advice. Staff spent 6028 h facilitating smoking, representing an annual cost of £ 131,040 across four wards. Incident reports demonstrated that smoking facilitation was often central to the cause of incidences, triggered frustration in patients, and strained staff resources. CONCLUSION The findings highlight the importance and potential of implementing completely smoke-free policies using comprehensive pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harpreet Sohal
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Division of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
| | - Lisa Huddlestone
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Division of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
| | - Elena Ratschen
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Division of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Parkes JH, Pyer M, Ward A, Doyle C, Dickens GL. 'Going into the unknown': experiences of male patients in secure settings during environmental transition. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2015; 24:2-10. [PMID: 25585986 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about the experiences of male patients in secure mental health and intellectual disability units during environmental transition. We interviewed patients before (n = 9) and after (n = 8) a side-to-side security transition from medium-secure wards in an older building to new wards in a purpose-built building. We inquired about transitional experiences in general and about this transition specifically. We examined interview transcripts and field notes using thematic analysis, and collated routine outcome data to gauge whether transition had obvious positive or negative effects. Qualitative analysis indicated three major themes (information, transition, and behaviour) and five overlapping subthemes (positive information sharing and consultation, concerns and anxieties about lack of information, life change and opportunity, home and sense of belonging, and potential conflict). Outcome data indicated little obvious change between first and second interviews. Expressed concerns of patients about transition were largely about tangible and practical issues, including changes to rules, including smoking and prohibited items. The results highlight the need for the development of supportive patient-inclusion strategies, consistent and transparent communication processes, and a published timeframe during the planning and implementation phases of all types of transitional moves, including the side-to-side transfer of residents between accommodation buildings.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wood VJ, Curtis SE, Gesler W, Spencer IH, Close HJ, Mason JM, Reilly JG. Spaces for smoking in a psychiatric hospital: social capital, resistance to control, and significance for 'therapeutic landscapes'. Soc Sci Med 2013; 97:104-11. [PMID: 24161095 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Revised: 07/02/2013] [Accepted: 08/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This paper reports on research framed by theories of therapeutic landscapes and the ways that the social, physical and symbolic dimensions of landscapes relate to wellbeing and healing. We focus especially on the question of how attributes of therapeutic landscapes are constructed in different ways according to the variable perspectives of individuals and groups. Through an ethnographic case study in a psychiatric hospital in the North of England we explore the perceived significance for wellbeing of 'smoking spaces' (where tobacco smoking is practiced in ways that may, or may not be officially sanctioned). We interpret our findings in light of literature on how smoking spaces are linked to the socio-geographical power relations that determine how smoking is organised within the hospital and how this is understood by different groups using the hospital building. We draw on qualitative research findings from discussion groups, observations, and interviews with patients, carers and staff. These focused on their views about the building design and setting of the new psychiatric hospital in relation to their wellbeing, and issues relating to smoking spaces emerged as important for many participants. Creating and managing smoking spaces as a public health measure in psychiatric hospitals is shown to be a controversial issue involving conflicting aims for health and wellbeing of patients and staff. Our findings indicate that although from a physical health perspective, smoking is detrimental, the spaces in which patients and staff smoke have social and psychological significance, providing a forum for the creation of social capital and resistance to institutional control. While the findings relate to one case study setting, the paper illustrates issues of wider relevance and contributes to an international literature concerning the tensions between perceived psychological and psychosocial benefits of smoking vs. physical harm that smoking is likely to cause. We consider the implications for hospital design and the model of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria J Wood
- Department of Geography, Durham University, Wolfson Research Institute, Queens Campus, Stockton-on-Tees DH17 6BH, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hehir AM, Indig D, Prosser S, Archer VA. Implementation of a smoke-free policy in a high secure mental health inpatient facility: staff survey to describe experience and attitudes. BMC Public Health 2013; 13:315. [PMID: 23566256 PMCID: PMC3648483 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2012] [Accepted: 03/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2008, a new forensic hospital was opened as a totally smoke-free facility. This study describes the attitudes and experience of mental health professionals working in the high secure mental health facility three years after it was opened. It is part of a larger evaluation describing the experience of current and discharged hospital patients. METHODS Quantitative data was collected using a survey of hospital staff (N = 111) with a 50% response rate. The survey collected demographic and smoking data to describe staff responses to statements relating to hospital smoking policy, patient care and staff support. RESULTS Among staff surveyed, 13% were current smokers and 41% were ex-smokers (10% quit after commencing employment in the smoke-free hospital). Most (88%) preferred to work in a smoke-free environment, although this was significantly lower in smokers compared to non-smokers (39% vs. 95%). While most staff felt that the smoke-free environment had a positive impact on the health of patients (86%) and on themselves (79%), smokers were significantly less likely to agree. Just over half (57%) of staff surveyed agreed that patient care was easier in a totally smoke-free environment, although less smokers agreed compared to non-smokers. Staff who smoked were also significantly less likely to indicate they had sufficient support working in a smoke-free environment, compared to non-smokers (15% vs. 38%). CONCLUSIONS The staff surveyed supported the smoke-free workplace policy; most agreed that patient care was easier and that the policy did not lead to an increase in patient aggression. Implementation of a total smoking ban can result in positive health outcomes for patients and staff, and may influence some staff to quit. Staff who smoke have a less positive experience of the policy and require additional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela M Hehir
- Centre for Health Research in Criminal Justice, Justice and Forensic Mental Health Network (J&FMHN), Suite 302, Level 2, 152 Bunnerong Rd, Eastgardens, NSW, 2036, Australia
| | - Devon Indig
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Shani Prosser
- J&FMHN, 1300 Anzac Parade, Malabar, NSW, 2036, Australia
| | - Vicki A Archer
- J&FMHN, Suite 302, Level 2, 152 Bunnerong Rd, Eastgardens, NSW, 2036, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Robson D, Cole F, Jalasi S, Boojharut B, Smith S, Thompson S, Jones M, Haddad M. Smoking cessation and serious mental illness: a service evaluation of a drop-in stop smoking clinic on an acute in-patient unit. J Clin Nurs 2012; 22:405-13. [PMID: 22946884 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04222.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of a stop smoking clinic on the quit rates of patients admitted to an acute in-patient unit. BACKGROUND The relationship between poor physical health and severe mental illness is well established. High rates of smoking appear to play an important causal role in the excess morbidity and mortality in this population. Stop smoking interventions for the general population are clinically effective and cost-effective. There is a small but promising evidence base for effective interventions to help people with a mental illness who wish to stop smoking but these have mostly been tested with community patients rather than acute in-patients. METHODS A service evaluation of a drop-in stop smoking clinic on an acute mental health in-patient unit was conducted. Patients' smoking status was measured at baseline and four weeks after their quit date using patient self-report and an expired breath carbon monoxide reading. RESULTS Over a six-month evaluation period, 46 patients set a quit date and 13 (28·3%) were abstinent at the four-week follow-up stage, verified by a carbon monoxide reading (χ(2) =33, df=1, sig p<0·0001). CONCLUSIONS This small-scale evaluation has shown a drop-in stop smoking intervention to be feasible, acceptable and associated with positive outcomes; further research with larger, more representative samples is required. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Enforcing smoke-free legislation is a contentious issue on mental health in-patient units, and there is a paucity of research to guide nursing practice in this area. An admission period in a smoke-free environment provides a crucial opportunity to offer smoking cessation treatment. With appropriate resources, expertise and support, it appears possible to apply smoking cessation interventions that are successful within the general population to mental health patients during an acute admission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Robson
- Section of Mental Health Nursing, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beary M, Hodgson R, Wildgust HJ. A critical review of major mortality risk factors for all-cause mortality in first-episode schizophrenia: clinical and research implications. J Psychopharmacol 2012; 26:52-61. [PMID: 22465947 DOI: 10.1177/0269881112440512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A bibliographical search was performed to identify and evaluate the impact in first-episode schizophrenia of the major mortality risk factors as described by the World Health Organisation (2009). We found that at first diagnosis rates of diabetes were only slightly increased, although lipid abnormalities, mild hypertension and being overweight were commonly reported. Levels of drug and alcohol abuse were high, as were pre-diagnosis rates of smoking, physical inactivity and poor cardiorespiratory fitness. During the first year of antipsychotic treatment, there were significant increases in the rates of hyperglycaemia/diabetes, obesity, lipid abnormalities and hypertension, but no changes in fitness levels, smoking or drug and alcohol abuse. In chronic schizophrenia, excess cancer and cardiac deaths seem linked in part to availability and quality of care. Innate risk factors such as abnormal reelin and raised prolactin may also be important. New evidence, such as an inverse relationship between body mass index and suicide in the general population, suggests accepted wisdom may not apply to patients at high risk of ending their own lives. With current knowledge emphasis needs to be placed by early intervention services on physical fitness, smoking and other substance misuse, diabetes and hypertension, as well as focusing on weight reduction only in the obese.
Collapse
|
14
|
Wye P, Bowman J, Wiggers J, Freund M, Wolfenden L, Stockings E. Treating nicotine dependence in mental health hospitals. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011. [DOI: 10.1080/17523281.2011.555077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|