Quality of emergency care on the night shift

Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Management-Results from a National Multi-Center Urgent Care Network Registry

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common diagnosis in patients presenting to urgent care centers (UCCs), yet there is scant research regarding treatment in these centers. While some of these patients are managed within UCCs, some are referred for further care in an emergency department (ED).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to identify the rate of patients referred to an ED and define predictors for this outcome. We analyzed the rates of AF diagnosis and hospital referral over the years. Finally, we described trends in patient anticoagulation (AC) medication use.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 5873 visits of patients over age 18 visiting the TEREM UCC network with a diagnosis of AF over 11 years. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors for ED referral.

RESULTS

In a multivariate model, predictors of referral to an ED included vascular disease (OR 1.88 (95% CI 1.43-2.45), p < 0.001), evening or night shifts (OR 1.31 (95% CI 1.11-1.55), p < 0.001; OR 1.68 (95% CI 1.32-2.15), p < 0.001; respectively), previously diagnosed AF (OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.26-0.37), p < 0.001), prior treatment with AC (OR 0.56 (95% CI 0.46-0.67), p < 0.001), beta blockers (OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.52-0.76), p < 0.001), and antiarrhythmic medication (OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.48-0.69), p < 0.001). Visits diagnosed with AF increased over the years (p = 0.030), while referrals to an ED decreased over the years (p = 0.050). The rate of novel oral anticoagulant prescriptions increased over the years.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of referral to an ED from a UCC over the years is declining but remains high. Referrals may be predicted using simple clinical variables. This knowledge may help to reduce the burden of hospitalizations.

Medico-legal risk and use of medical directives in the emergency department

PURPOSE

The medico-legal risk associated with application of medical directives in the emergency department (ED) is unknown. The objective of this study was to describe and analyze factors associated with medico-legal risk in cases involving medical directives in the ED.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive analysis of closed medico-legal cases [hospital complaints, regulatory authority (i.e., College) complaints, and civil legal actions] involving emergency physicians in Canadian EDs involving medical directives (alternate terms including "standing order", "nursing initiated", "nurse initiated", "nursing order", "triage initiated", "triage ordered", "directive", "ED protocol", and "ED's protocol"). We used data from closed cases involving the Canadian Medical Protective Association from January 2016 until December 2021. We abstracted descriptive factors of the cases and used a framework for contributing factors classification.

RESULTS

From 2016 until 2021, 43,332 cases were closed and 1957 involved emergency physicians for which there was medico-legal information available for analysis. In all, 28 involved emergency physicians and medical directives. Situational awareness, team communication, and issues with clinical decision-making were the most important factors contributing to harm and medico-legal risk. Peer experts were critical of physicians not reviewing all results available for patients when initiated through a directive, misinterpreting test results, a less than thorough initial assessment, and of failing to reassess patients or re-order investigations when indicated.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the medico-legal risk exposure from the use of medical directives in the ED is low. Emergency departments may consider implementing systems to support adherence to medical directive policies, ensure physicians are alerted when medical directives are completed in a timely fashion, and leverage tools to notify the healthcare team when results have not been reviewed.

Clinical incidents in the emergency department: is there an association with emergency nursing shift patterns? A retrospective observational study

Introduction

Clinical incident (CI) management within healthcare settings is a crucial component of patient safety and quality improvement. The complex environment in the emergency department (ED) and nursing work schedules are important aspects of human factor ergonomic (HFE) systems that requires closer examination. Nursing shifts are closely related to fatigue, including the late/early shift pattern and night shift. All nursing shifts were examined over a 1-year period when a CI occurred to a patient in the ED to identify if there was an association.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study, conducted and reported using the Strengthening of the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement. All CIs reported in the ED over a 1-year period were reviewed by accessing the CI database, emergency department information system and patient health records. The nursing roster database was accessed to record nursing shifts and were de-identified.

Results

A total of n=244 CIs were eligible for inclusion into the study. ED nursing shift analysis included n=1095 nursing shifts. An analysis of early, late and night shifts, including days not worked by the ED nurse was conducted over a 48-hour and 96-hour period. There was no significant relationship identified between the CI and nursing shift patterns. ED length of stay (LOS) was significantly higher for a patient presentation when a CI occurred.

Conclusion

This study focused on the HFE system of nursing work schedules and CI events that occurred in the ED. This study found there was no relationship between emergency nursing shift patterns and an increased risk for the occurrence of a CI in the ED. Although a strong link was found between patients experiencing a CI in the ED and an extended LOS. This demonstrates the need for studies to investigate the interrelationships of multiple HFE systems in the ED, including the environment, patient, clinical team and organisational factors.

[Impact of weather, time of day and season on the admission and outcome of major trauma patients]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The potential association of external factors such as time of day, lunar phases or specific weather conditions on the daily management and outcome of trauma emergencies remains under debate. We undertook this trauma centre investigation to detect possible worthwhile factors of influence in order to optimize the organizational structure of trauma admissions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis over the years 2010-2013, including all emergency trauma admissions with a new injury severity score (NISS) ≥8 (major trauma) treated in a teaching hospital in the lowland of Switzerland (uni- and multivariable analysis; p < 0.05).

RESULTS

During the study period, 1178 major trauma patients were admitted to the hospital. The mean age of trauma victims was 53 ± 23 and the average ISS was 14 ± 8. More patients arrived within the summer months than during the rest of the year (p < 0.001). Higher energy trauma was found to correlate with higher daytime temperature, longer duration of sunshine (each p < 0.001), and change in weather conditions (p = 0.008). In contrast, snowfall and lunar phases did not demonstrate any association with the number or characteristics of trauma admissions. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that altogether longer sunshine, higher minimum daytime temperature and lower air humidity, compared to the previous day, accounted for 31 % of major trauma admissions. We could not find any impact of the investigated external factors on the outcome of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows a significant relationship between specific weather conditions, such as higher daytime temperature or change in circulation, and the admission of major trauma patients. Due to the small effect in our setting, our results do not implicate any according change in the management of resources. Nevertheless, for hospitals in other geographic or more exposed weather regions, such effects could indeed be relevant and therefore should be tested.

Factors associated with iatrogenesis in neonatal intensive care units: an observational multicenter study

The objective of our study was to assess factors associated with iatrogenic events in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs). This was a retrospective analysis based on a cohort of patients who participated in our previous prospective study (Pediatrics 122:550-555, 2008), conducted in four tertiary university-affiliated NICUs in Israel, that included all consecutive infants (n = 615) hospitalized during the study period. Ongoing monitoring of iatrogenic events was performed by designated "iatrogenesis advocates." The main outcome measures were the association of individual infant characteristics and NICUs' environmental characteristics with iatrogenic events assessed by univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. We found that four infant characteristics were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with iatrogenic events in a univariate analysis: gestational age, birth weight, severity of initial illness as assessed by the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology and Perinatal Extension (SNAPPE II), and length of stay (LOS). All four factors demonstrated a significant (p < 0.001) dose-response relationship with iatrogenic events. Univariate analysis for environmental characteristics showed that type of shift, but not nursing workload, was significantly associated with iatrogenic events (p < 0.001). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, only LOS (adjusted OR 1.02 [95 % CI, 1.01-1.03]) and type of shift, morning vs. evening (adjusted OR 3.44 [95 % CI, 2.33-5.08]) and morning vs. night (adjusted OR 6.07 [95 % CI, 3.86-9.56]), remained independently associated with iatrogenic events (p < 0.001). Prolonged LOS and morning shifts were found to be significantly associated with iatrogenic events. Further prospective research is warranted to identify the specific causes for iatrogenic events in order to target active interventions to prevent them.

Mortality rates following trauma: The difference is night and day

Background:

Although most medical centers are equipped for 24-h care, some “middle of the night” services may not be as robust as they are during daylight hours. This would have potential impact upon certain outcome measurements in trauma patients. The purpose of this paper was to assess the effect of patient arrival time at hospital emergency departments on in-hospital survival following trauma.

Materials and Methods:

Data of patients, 18 years of age or older, with no evidence that they were transferred to or from that center were obtained from the National Trauma Data Bank Version 7.0. Patients meeting the above criteria were excluded if there was no valid mortality status, arrival time information, injury severity score, or trauma center designation. The primary analyses investigated the association of arrival time and trauma center level on mortality. Relative risks of mortality versus patient arrival time and trauma level were determined after controlling for age, gender, race, comorbidities, injury, region of the country, and year of admission.

Results:

In total, 601,388 or 71.7% of the 838,284 eligible patients were retained. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.7%. The 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. time period had a significantly higher adjusted relative risk for in-hospital mortality than the 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. time frame (ARR=1.18, P<;0.0001). This pattern held across trauma center levels, but was the weakest at Level I and the strongest at Level III/IV centers (Level I: ARR=1.10, Level II: ARR=1.14, and combined Level III/IV: ARR=1.32, all P<0.0001).

Conclusion:

Hospital arrival between midnight and 6 a.m. was associated with a higher mortality rate than other times of the day. This relationship held true across all trauma center levels. This information may warrant a redistribution of hospital resources across all time periods of the day.

Factors associated with longer emergency department length of stay for children with bronchiolitis : a prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

Emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS) is a quality of care measure and, when prolonged, contributes to ED crowding. Bronchiolitis, a common seasonal illness of infants, provides an opportunity to examine factors affecting ED LOS.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a 30-center prospective cohort study of ED patients younger than 2 years with an attending physician diagnosis of bronchiolitis to determine what factors affect LOS. Researchers conducted a structured interview and chart review.

RESULTS

Among 1459 children enrolled, ED LOS was available for 1416 children (97%). The median ED LOS was 3.3 hours (interquartile range, 2.3-4.8 hours). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that factors significantly (P < 0.05) associated with ED LOS were larger annual ED visit volume (reference, lowest tertile [< 44,134 visits], 44,134-62,420 [β = 0.74], and ≥ 62,421 [β = 0.63]), Hispanic race/ethnicity (reference, white race, β = 1.43), lack of primary care provider (β = 1.28), duration of symptoms of 4 to 7 days (reference, < 1 day; β = 0.58), presentation of midnight to 7 AM (reference, 4:00-11:59 PM; β = 1.07), decreasing lowest oxygen saturation in ED (β = 0.07), fewer number of A-agonists during the first hour (β = 0.74), unknown oral intake (reference, adequate; β = 0.69), performance of chest x-ray (β = 0.62), and hospital admission (β = 1.11).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective multicenter study of children younger than 2 years with bronchiolitis, multiple factors were associated with longer ED LOS. These factors suggest the following steps to help shorten ED LOS: optimizing translation services, improving primary care provider rates, enhancing overnight patient flow, forgoing chest x-rays, and developing evidence-based admission criteria.

Improvement in out-of-hours outcomes following the implementation of Hospital at Night

BACKGROUND

Hospital at Night (H@N) is a Department of Health (England) driven programme being widely implemented across UK. It aims to redefine how medical cover is provided in hospitals during the out-of-hours period.

AIM

To investigate whether the implementation of H@N is associated with significant change in system or clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

An observational study for 14 consecutive nights before, and 14 consecutive nights after the implementation of H@N. Data were collected from the Combined surgical and medical Assessment Unit (CAU), the 18 medical/surgical wards (The Ward Arc) and the four High Dependency Units (The Critical Care corridor) within the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.

METHODS

Following an overnight episode of clinical concern, data were gathered on response time, seniority of reviewing staff, patient outcome and the use of Standardized Early Warning Score (SEWS).

RESULTS

Two hundred and nine episodes of clinical concern were recorded before the implementation of H@N and 216 episodes afterwards. There was no significant change in response time in the CAU, Ward Arc or Critical Care corridor. However, significant inter-speciality differences in response time were eradicated, particularly in the Critical Care corridor. Following the implementation of H@N, patients were reviewed more frequently by senior medical staff in CAU (28% vs. 4%, P < 0.05) and the Critical Care corridor (50% vs. 22%, P < 0.001). Finally there was a reduction in adverse outcome (defined as unplanned transfer to critical care/cardiac arrest) in the Ward Arc and CAU from 17% to 6% of patients reviewed overnight (P < 0.01). SEWS was more frequently and accurately recorded in CAU.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that we are aware of directly comparing out-of-hours performance before and after the implementation of H@N. Significant improvements in both patient and system outcomes were observed, with no adverse effects noted.

Influence of presentation at the weekend on treatment and outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction in hospitals with catheterization laboratories

BACKGROUND

Studies about the influence of various factors on clinical therapy and course in acute coronary syndromes have shown that the outcome is related to admission time to the hospital, with an impaired prognosis in patients admitted out of regular working hours. However little is known about the impact of admission on weekend in hospitals with catheterisation laboratories.

METHODS

We analyzed data of the prospective MITRA-PLUS registry of 11,516 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) admitted to hospitals with catheterization facilities for differences of in-hospital mortality between patients admitted during regular working hours, at night and on weekends.

RESULTS

The prehospital delay and "door-to-balloon"-time were significantly longer on weekends and at nights than at regular working hours (median 196 Vs. 240 Vs. 155 min; P < 0.0001; 60 Vs. 84 min at weekends, resp. 75 min at nights; P < 0.0001). Reperfusion therapy was performed in 72.8% (8,248/11,332) patients, and there were less patients treated on weekend versus "on"-hours (69.7 Vs. 77 %, P < 0.0001). On weekends we found a significant higher in-hospital mortality (11.1 Vs. 9.4%, P = 0.01) and at night there was a trend to higher in-hospital mortality when compared with regular working hours (10.6 Vs. 9.4%, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

In patients with STEMI admitted to hospitals with catheterization facilities, admission during the "off"-hours is associated with higher in-hospital mortality. This may be due to lower rates of revascularization therapy and longer prehospital and in-hospital delays as compared to "on"-hours.