Evaluation of the torque-velocity test of the BTE-Primus as a measure of sincerity of effort of grip strength

Effect of the Trunk and Upper Limb Passive Stabilization on Hand Movements and Grip Strength Following Various Types of Strokes—An Observational Cohort Study

Almost half of the patients surveyed report impaired function of the upper limbx and handx after stroke. The effect of the passive trunk and shoulder stabilization on the recovery of coordinated hand movement is unclear. This study examined whether passive stabilization of the trunk and shoulder could improve the functional state of the hands after various types of strokes. It is an observational prospective cohort study conducted at the Rehabilitation Clinic in two parallel groups of patients with four different types of strokes (hemorrhagic and ischemic of the brain, similar to the cerebellum). A total of 120 patients were analyzed. Patients were examined in various positions: sitting without a backrest with the upper limb adjacent to the body, supine with the upper limb perpendicular to the body, and supine with the arm stabilized in relation to the patient’s body. Hand Tutor devices and a hand dynamometer were used for the measurements. The frequency and maximum range of motion as well as the grip strength were measured in three different positions of the trunk and upper limb. Passive stabilization of the trunk and shoulder showed more statistically significant differences in Group II. In group II, both in patients after hemorrhagic stroke (wrist Hz p = 0.019; wrist ROM p = 0.005; Hz F5 p = 0.021; Hz F4 p = 0.016; Hz F3 p = 0.019; Hz F2 p = 0.021) and ischemic stroke (p = 0.001 for wrist Hz, wrist ROM, Hz F from 5 to F2; and ROM F1; ROM F3 p = 0.009; ROM F2 p = 0.010), and hemorrhagic cerebellum, improvement of parameters was observed. Stabilization of the upper limb and passive stabilization of the trunk improved the frequency and range of movements in the radiocarpal joint and in the fingers of patients after stroke, regardless of the type of stroke.

The Use of Armeo®Spring Device to Assess the Effect of Trunk Stabilization Exercises on the Functional Capabilities of the Upper Limb-An Observational Study of Patients after Stroke

Almost half of stroke patients report impaired function of the upper limb and hand. Stability of the trunk is required for the proper movement of the body, including the legs and arms. The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of trunk stabilization exercises on coordinated movement of the affected upper limb in patients after stroke, using an Armoe®Spring device and the “wall” and “abacus” functional tests. Materials and methods: This is a randomized, double-blinded study. The research was carried out in the Rehabilitation Clinic on a group of 60 stroke patients who were randomly assigned to groups differing in the rehabilitation program. The study group had physiotherapy based on the NDT Bobath concept and the control group used classic exercises. The importance of the trunk for upper limb coordination was assessed on the Armeo®Spring device using three evaluation programs, “perpendicular fishing”; “horizontal fishing”; “reaction time”, and two proprietary tests, “wall” and “abacus”. Results: The post-treatment analysis showed significantly better results in the study group for the abacus (p < 0.001), wall (p = 0.003) tests, and a significantly higher percentage of task completion in the vertical fishing (p = 0.036) and reaction time (p = 0.009) tests. Conclusions: Physiotherapy including exercises to stabilize the trunk had a significant effect on increasing the functional efficiency of the affected upper limb and on improving the handgrip strength. The Armeo®Spring device is a good device for the functional assessment of the upper limb before and after therapy.

Change in the Results of Motor Coordination and Handgrip Strength Depending on Age and Body Position-An Observational Study of Stroke Patients and Healthy Volunteers

Objective: The stroke is considered a common disease of the elderly. Young people also get sick, but the risk of stroke increases with the age of 60. Stroke, regardless of the age of the patients, causes functional deficits; therefore, the aim of the study was to analyze the significance of the body position and examined upper limb on the parameters of motor coordination and handgrip strength in various age groups of people after stroke and healthy people. Material and method: This is an observational study. A total of 117 people participated in the study (60 stroke patients and 57 healthy people without neurological disorders). Both patients and healthy volunteers were prospectively divided into three age groups: 18−45, 46−60, and 61+. The tests were carried out in two starting positions: sitting without back support and lying on the back with the upper limb stabilized against the body. HandTutorTM and a hand dynamometer were used to assess the motor coordination, including the maximum range of motion and frequency of movement, as well as the grip strength. Results: The passive stabilization of the trunk and shoulder improved the maximum wrist ROM (p < 0.001) and frequency of finger movements (Hz F5 p = 0.018; F3 p = 0.010; F2 p = 0.011), especially in the oldest stroke patients. In the group of healthy volunteers, the most statistically significant results were obtained in the age range of 46−60. They occurred in both stable (wrist maxROM p = 0.041 and Hz F5 p = 0.034; Hz F4 p = 0.010; Hz F3 p = 0.028; Hz F1 p = 0.034, maxROM F1 p = 0.041) and unstable positions (maxROM F5 p = 0.034; maxROM F4 p = 0.050; maxROM F3 p = 0.002; maxROM F2 p = 0.002). In the group of the oldest healthy people, only one significant result was obtained in the stable position (Hz F3 p = 0.043). Conclusion: Passive stabilization of the trunk and examined upper limb improves the results of motor coordination of the distal part of the upper limb in both study groups. Passive stabilization of the trunk and upper limb improves motor coordination, especially in the oldest group of patients, after stroke.

Are there any changes in strength after the application of Kinesio taping in lateral epicondylalgia?

BACKGROUND

In 1973, Dr. Kenzo Kase developed Kinesio taping from the hypothesis that this external component could aid the functions of muscles and other tissues. There are different studies on this issue, but none has completely clarified the research question.

OBJECTIVE

To study the application of Kinesio taping in the variation of isometric muscle strength of the hand extension and grip, isokinetic strength of the pronation and supination movements, and the time it takes to reach that strength in patients with lateral epicondylalgia.

METHODS

An analytical, experimental, randomized study was carried out with 104 subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. The subjects were randomly distributed among two groups: one received Kinesio taping and the other a placebo material. A pre- and post-intervention measurement was performed. The post-measurement was carried out 24 hours later so as to completely eliminate the fatigue effect produced by the first day measurements, as well as to ensure that the intervention was effective, and not immediate. The measurements were made using a dynamometer.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the application of Kinesio taping and placebo material in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia regarding the variation of muscle strength in any of the study variables (p> 0.05 for all studied variables).

CONCLUSIONS

Kinesio taping produces no change in strength after application and exerts an effect similar to that of a placebo.

Identifying sincerity of effort by grip strength ratio of three wrist positions in individuals with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the grip strength ratio of three wrist positions could determine sincerity of effort (SOE), by differentiating between maximal effort (ME) and submaximal effort (SE), in individuals with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).

METHODS

A total of 19 volunteers with unilateral upper extremity MSDs (9 males, 10 females) participated in this study. Participants performed grip strength tests in neutral, full flexion, and full extension wrist positions for both hands. In each wrist position, they exerted grip force with their ME and preferred SE for three times.

RESULTS

Significant main effects of type of effort, wrist position (P < .001), and hand (P = .005) were observed. The results also showed significant interactions for type of effort × wrist position (P < .001) and wrist positions × hand (P = .001). Moreover, the grip strength ratios of neutral/flexion (N/F) and neutral/extension (N/E) between ME and SE differed significantly (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the N/F and N/E grip strength ratios can discriminate between ME and SE in individuals with upper extremity MSDs. Thus, this test might be applicable to use for identifying SOE in clinical setting.

Differentiating maximal and submaximal voluntary strength measures for the purposes of medico-legal assessments and para sport classification: A systematic review

Measurement of maximum voluntary muscle contractions are effort-dependent - valid measurement requires maximal voluntary effort (MVE) from participants. Submaximal efforts (SMEs) yield invalid and potentially misleading results. This is particularly problematic in medico-legal and Para sport assessments where low strength scores may confer a personal advantage. Therefore, objective methods for accurately differentiating MVE and SME are required. This systematic review aimed to identify, appraise and synthesise evidence from scientific studies evaluating the validity of objective methods for differentiating MVE from SME during maximal voluntary contractions. Four electronic databases were searched for original research articles published in English and secondary references appraised for relevance yielding 25 studies for review. Methods were categorised based on eight distinct underlying theories. For isokinetic strength assessment, methods based on two theories - Strength-measure Ratios and Inter-Trial Strength Consistency - correctly classified 100% MVE and > 92% SME. Consequently, research evaluating the relative suitability of these methods for translation into practice is warranted. During isometric strength assessments, methods based on Deceptive Visual Feedback and Force-length properties warrant further investigation. Both methods yielded statistically significant differences between MVE and SME, with minimal overlap in values, but their sensitivity and specificity have not been evaluated.

Determining Sincerity of Effort Based on Grip Strength Test in Three Wrist Positions

Background

Several grip strength tests are commonly used for detecting sincerity of effort. However, there is still no widely accepted standardized sincerity of effort test. Therefore, this study aimed to examine whether grip strength test in three wrist positions could distinguish between maximal and submaximal efforts.

Methods

Twenty healthy individuals (10 men and 10 women) with a mean age of 26.7 ± 3.92 years participated in this study. All participants completed two test conditions (maximal and submaximal efforts) in three wrist positions (neutral, flexion, and extension) using both hands. Each participant exerted 100% effort in the maximal effort condition and 50% effort in the submaximal effort condition. The participants performed three repetitions of the grip strength test for each session.

Results

The results showed that there is a significant main effect of the type of effort (p < 0.001), wrist position (p < 0.001), and hand (p = 0.028). There were also significant types of effort and wrist position interactions (p < 0.001) and effort and hand interactions (p < 0.028). The results also showed that grip strength was highest at the wrist in neutral position in both the maximal and the submaximal effort condition. Grip strength values of the three wrist positions in the maximal effort condition were noticeably greater than those in the submaximal effort condition.

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that grip strength test in three wrist positions can differentiate a maximal effort from a submaximal effort. Thus, this test could potentially be used to detect sincerity of effort in clinical setting.

Identifying sincerity of effort based on the combined predictive ability of multiple grip strength tests

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

INTRODUCTION

Detecting sincerity of effort (SOE) of grip strength remains a frustrating and elusive task for hand therapists because there are no valid, reliable, or widely accepted assessments for identifying feigned effort. Some therapists use various combinations of different SOE tests in an attempt to identify feigned effort, but there is lack of evidence to support this practice.

PURPOSE

The present study examined the ability of a combination of three grip strength tests commonly used in the clinic to detect SOE: the five rung grip test, rapid exchange grip test, and coefficient of variation. A secondary purpose was to compare the predictive ability between the logistic and linear regression models.

METHODS

Healthy participants (n=146) performed the three SOE tests exerting both maximal and submaximal efforts. We compared the ability of two regression models, the logistic and linear models, to predict sincere versus insincere efforts.

RESULTS

Combining the three tests predicted SOE better than each test alone. Yet, the full logistic model, which was the best predictor of SOE, explained only 42% of variance and correctly classified only 58% of the efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not support the clinical practice of combining these three tests to detect SOE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Not applicable.

A test case: does the availability of visual feedback impact grip strength scores when using a digital dynamometer?

A cross-sectional, quantitative study of clinical measurement utility. New technological advances can challenge the efficacy of even the most widely accepted and respected tests. For example, grip strength instruments offer digital or computerized displays, precision scoring, and varied interfaces that differ from traditional Jamar™ dynamometers (Lafayette, IN). This test case explores how the opportunity to view grip strength scores during testing can influence outcomes. One hundred forty-six healthy subjects, aged 18-24 years, were tested for grip strength under visual feedback and no visual feedback conditions, using the JTech Grip Dynamometer (Salt Lake City, UT). Participants achieved a small, yet statistically significant, 1.74 lb stronger grip score with visual feedback (p<0.002). The order of grip testing conditions yielded no statistically significant differences (p=0.559). These findings suggest the need to consider how new features, unavailable with the analog Jamar™ dynamometer and unaccounted for in existing clinical guidelines could potentially influence grip scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Not applicable.

Differentiating between types and levels of isokinetic knee musculature efforts

This investigation assessed whether a measure of moment curve shape similarity, and a measure quantifying curve magnitude differences, enables differentiation between types (sincere vs. feigned) and levels (maximal vs. submaximal) of effort exerted during isokinetic testing of the knee. Healthy participants (n=37) performed four sets of six concentric knee extension-flexion repetitions on two occasions. The sets consisted of: (1) maximal effort; (2) self-perceived 75% of maximal effort; (3) self-perceived 50% of maximal effort; and (4) a set attempting to feign injury. Average cross-correlation and percent root mean square difference values were computed between moment curves in each direction. Logistic regression was used to derive decision rules for differentiating between maximal and submaximal effort levels; and between sincere and feigned effort types. Using a cutoff criteria corresponding to 100% specificity, maximal effort production could be ascertained with 96% sensitivity within the sample. Feigned efforts, however, could be ascertained with only 31% sensitivity due to overlap with sincere submaximal effort. Using the proposed models, clinicians may be able to ascertain whether maximal efforts were produced during isokinetic knee musculature testing. Additionally, evidence regarding participant's intentions with regard to influencing test results may be gauged, although to a lesser extent.

Validity and Critical Driving Errors of On-Road Assessment for Older Drivers

OBJECTIVES. We examined the validity of our on-road driving assessment to quantify its outcomes.

METHOD. Older drivers (N = 127) completed a driving assessment on a standardized road course. Measurements included demographics, driving errors, and driving test outcomes; a categorical global rating score (pass–fail); and the sum of maneuvers (SMS) score (0–273).

RESULTS. There were significant differences in the SMS (F = 29.9, df = 1 p ≤ .001) between drivers who passed the driving test and those who failed. The SMS cutoff value of 230 points was established as the criterion because it yielded the most optimal combination of sensitivity (0.91) and specificity (0.87). The strongest predictors of failure were adjustment to stimuli and lane maintenance errors.

CONCLUSION. The SMS differentiated between passing and failing drivers and can be used to inform clinical decision making.