1
|
Adesoye T, Katz MHG, Offodile AC. Meeting Trial Participants Where They Are: Decentralized Clinical Trials as a Patient-Centered Paradigm for Enhancing Accrual and Diversity in Surgical and Multidisciplinary Trials in Oncology. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:317-321. [PMID: 36821820 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Taiwo Adesoye
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anaeze C Offodile
- Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Offodile AC, Delgado D, Lin YL, Geyen D, Miller CJ, Jain S, Finder JP, Shete S, Fossella FV, Overman MJ, Peterson SK. Integration of Remote Symptom and Biometric Monitoring Into the Care of Adult Patients With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy-A Decentralized Feasibility Pilot Study. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:e811-e821. [PMID: 36821818 PMCID: PMC10332844 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) are efficacious in symptom management, much is unknown about the utility of vital signs surveillance. We examined the feasibility of a remote patient monitoring platform that integrates ePROs and biometrics into the ambulatory management of symptom burden. METHODS Using a decentralized workflow, patients with gastrointestinal or thoracic cancer were approached for a 1-month study. Patients reported symptom burden via ePROs and biometrics (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, pulse, weight, and temperature) using bluetooth-enabled devices daily. Alerts on the basis of prespecified thresholds were managed via nurse-led triage. Adherence was defined as the completion of > 70% of daily symptom and biometric reporting requirements. Pilot acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility were measured using validated instruments. Net promoter score, system usability scale, and emergency department (ED) admission rates were collected. RESULTS Over 8 months, 36 patients were enrolled and 25 (60% gastrointestinal) completed the study. Participants had a mean age of 58.0 years, mean Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0.88, were 52% female, and predominantly had stage IV or recurrent disease (72%). Program adherence was 73% and associated with high acceptability (4.63), feasibility (4.56), and appropriateness (4.46). System usability scale and net promoter score scores were 88 and 55, respectively. Seventy percent of alerts were generated by biometrics, 28% for symptoms, and 2% were patient-initiated communication. Finally, the ED visitation rate over the pilot period was 8%. CONCLUSION Our remote patient monitoring pilot program was highly acceptable, feasible, and appropriate. It had high rates of patient adherence and satisfaction and was associated with low ED visitation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anaeze C. Offodile
- Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Domenica Delgado
- Office of the Chief Data and Technology Officer, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yu-Li Lin
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Danielle Geyen
- Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christopher J. Miller
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sanchita Jain
- Office of the Chief Data and Technology Officer, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Janice P. Finder
- Patient Experience Clinical Programs, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sanjay Shete
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Frank V. Fossella
- Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael J. Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Susan K. Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fu S, Gerber DE, Beg MS. Decentralized Clinical Trials in Oncology: Are We Ready for a Virtual-First Paradigm? J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:181-185. [PMID: 35994691 PMCID: PMC9839231 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sherry Fu
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David E. Gerber
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Muhammad Shaalan Beg
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
- Science 37, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Braun-Inglis C, Williams EL, Macchiaroli A, Denicoff A, Gerber DE. Better Late Than Never: Fully Incorporating Oncology Advanced Practice Providers Into Cancer Clinical Trials. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:729-732. [PMID: 35960907 PMCID: PMC9653202 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Braun-Inglis
- University of Hawaii School of Nursing and Dental Hygiene and University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Erin L. Williams
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Alyssa Macchiaroli
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Andrea Denicoff
- Clinical Investigations Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - David E. Gerber
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The COVID-19 pandemic posed several challenges to cancer research including halting of trials, reduced recruitment and protocol violations related to inflexible processes followed in clinical trials. Researchers adopted innovative measures to mitigate these problems and continue studies without compromising their quality. This review collates these adaptations that could well continue after the pandemic. RECENT FINDINGS The COVID-19 pandemic forced researchers globally to adopt innovative measures to overcome the challenges of the pandemic. These included protocol amendments to adjust to the pandemic and travel restrictions, and increased use of digital technologies. 'Virtual' clinical trials were conducted increasingly with adaptations in ethics and regulatory approvals, patient recruitment and consenting, study interventions and delivery of study medications, trial assessments, and monitoring. Many of these adaptations are safe and feasible, without compromising study quality and data integrity. Although these may not be universally applicable in all types of research, they bring many benefits including more diverse patient participation, less burden on patients for study procedures and reduced resources to conduct trials. SUMMARY The COVID-19 pandemic has affected cancer research adversely; however, learnings from the pandemic and adaptations from researchers are likely to improve the efficiency of clinical research beyond the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C.S. Pramesh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Offodile AC, DiBrito SR, Finder JP, Shete S, Jain S, Delgado DA, Miller CJ, Davidson E, Overman MJ, Peterson SK. Active surveillance of chemotherapy-related symptom burden in ambulatory cancer patients via the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcomes and sensor-enabled vital signs capture: protocol for a decentralised feasibility pilot study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057693. [PMID: 35383081 PMCID: PMC8984061 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has emerged as a potential avenue for optimising the management of symptoms in patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, RPM is a complex, multilevel intervention with technology, workflow, contextual and patient experience components. The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility of RPM protocol implementation with respect to decentralised recruitment, patient retention, adherence to reporting recommendations, RPM platform usability and patient experience in ambulatory cancer patients at high risk for chemotherapy-related symptoms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol describes a single-arm decentralised feasibility pilot study of technology-enhanced outpatient symptom management system in patients with gastrointestinal and thoracic cancer receiving chemotherapy and cancer care at a single site (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston Texas). An anticipated total of 25 patients will be recruited prior to the initiation of chemotherapy and provided with a set of validated questionnaires at enrollment and after our 1-month feasibility pilot trial period. Our intervention entails the self-reporting of symptoms and vital signs via a HIPAA-compliant, secure tablet interface that also enables (1) the provision of self-care materials to patients, (2) generation of threshold alerts to a dedicated call-centre and (3) videoconferencing. Vital sign information (heart rate, blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation, weight and temperature) will be captured via Bluetooth-enabled biometric monitoring devices which are integrated with the tablet interface. Protocolised triage and management of symptoms will occur in response to the alerts. Feasibility and acceptability metrics will characterise our recruitment process, protocol adherence, patient retention and usability of the RPM platform. We will also document the perceived effectiveness of our intervention by patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been granted approval by the institutional review board of MD Anderson Cancer Center. We anticipate dissemination of our pilot and subsequent effectiveness trial results via presentations at national conferences and peer-reviewed publications in the relevant medical journals. Our results will also be made available to cancer survivors, their caregivers and hospital administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCI202107464.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anaeze C Offodile
- Institute for Cancer Care Innovation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sandra R DiBrito
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Janice P Finder
- Patient Experience Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sanjay Shete
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sanchita Jain
- Office of the Chief, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Domenica A Delgado
- Office of the Chief, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christopher J Miller
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elenita Davidson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael J Overman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|