Infection Prevention and Control Measures at the Children Hospital Lahore: A My Child Matters Collaborative Project

Infection control practices in public sector hospitals of Punjab: a critical analysis

INTRODUCTION

Infection prevention and control (IPC) is imperative towards patient safety and health. The Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) developed by WHO provides a baseline assessment at the acute healthcare facility level. This study aimed to assess the existing IPC level of selected public sector hospital facilities in Punjab to explore their strengths and deficits.

METHODS

Between October and April 2023, 11 public sector hospitals (including tertiary, secondary and primary level care) were selected. Data were collected using the IPCAF assessment tool comprising eight sections, which were then categorised into four distinct IPC levels- inadequate, basic, intermediate and advanced. Key performance metrics were summarised within and between hospitals.

RESULTS

The overall median IPCAF score for the public sector hospitals was 532.5 (IQR: 292.5-690) out of 800. Four hospitals each scored 'advanced' as well as 'basic' IPC level and three hospitals fell into 'intermediate level'. Most hospitals had IPC guidelines as well as IPC programme, environments, materials and equipments. Although 90% of secondary care hospitals had IPC education and training, only 2 out of 5 (40%) tertiary care and 2 out of 3 (67%) primary care hospitals have IPC or additional experts for training. Only 1 out of 5 tertiary care hospitals (20%) were recorded in an agreed ratio of healthcare workers to patients while 2 out of 5 (40%) of these hospitals lack staffing need assessment.

CONCLUSION

Overall the sampled public sector (tertiary, secondary and primary) hospitals demonstrated satisfactory IPC level. Challenging areas are the healthcare-associated infection surveillance, monitoring/audit and staffing, bed occupancy overall in all the three categories of hospitals. Periodic training and assessment can facilitate improvement in public sector systems.

Infection-related mortality and infection control practices in childhood acute myeloid leukemia in a limited resource setting: Experience with the Indonesian national protocol

Background

In resource-limited settings, addressing infections remains a substantial challenge in the management of children with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). In Indonesia, infection-related mortality (IRM) is thought to be high compared to high-income countries. However, there has been no previous study of infection profile and IRM in Indonesian patients with AML.

Objective

This study aimed to describe infections and IRM in children with AML treated according to the Indonesian National AML protocol and to describe the implementation of infection control practices in resource-limited settings.

Methods

This retrospective observational study used secondary data from the medical records of pediatric patients with AML treated with the National Protocol at Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, from April 2012 to September 2018. Essential patient characteristics, time of IRM, and cause of death were recorded, and infection control practices were observed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

113 patients with AML were treated with the National protocol, and 83 met the inclusion criteria. Infections occurred in 69 (83%) patients with a total of 123 episodes (mean 1.8/patient). Death was seen in 48 (58%) patients, with 19 (23%) IRM. The majority of infections were in the gastrointestinal tract (n = 51, 30.5%), sepsis (n = 29, 17%), and respiratory tract (n = 28, 17%). Infections mostly occurred during the first induction (41%). There were 90 (73%) episodes of clinically documented infection and 33 (27%) episodes of microbiologically documented infection. The positivity rate of blood cultures was only 27%. The majority of bacteria detected were gram-negative (n = 25, 69%), and among them were Klebsiella pneumonia (19%) and Escherichia coli (19%). Candida albicans was detected in 1 (2%) culture. Suboptimal infection prevention and control were found in the clinical practice.

Conclusion

Infections and infection-related mortality in children with AML treated using the National protocol were frequent, mainly occurring during the first induction phase. Compliance with infection prevention and control measures needs improvement. Urgent attention is required for better supportive care, including isolation rooms, antibiotics, and antifungals. The predominance of Gram-negative bacterial infections highlights the necessity for further research into effective prophylaxis. Enhanced healthcare and nursing professional vigilance and tailored antibiotic strategies are vital. Improving compliance and ensuring adequate supportive care resources are essential, emphasizing nursing's pivotal role. Further research is crucial to drive advancements in infection control strategies.

Infection prevention and control program assessment tools: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Infection prevention and control program (IPCP) assessment tools help to identify the improvement needs. This study aimed to identify fit-for-purpose of 3 IPCP assessment tools.

METHODS

An exploratory mixed-method study was performed from 2018-2019 in Brazil, using a convenience sample of IPC professionals with various levels of experience to evaluate the IPCP tools: (1) the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework at the Facility Level (IPCAF), (2) the University of Sao Paulo IPCP tool (OGIPCP), and (3) the Infection Prevention and Control Programme Evaluation (IPCPE) tool. A quantitative survey followed by a semi-structured interview accessed the participants' perceptions about these tools. Quantitative data analysis were descriptive and qualitative data were thematical.

RESULTS

IPCPE was considered more complete, better for effectiveness, easy to apply, and with easily interpreted indicators. IPCAF was the best regarding to purpose, easy reporting, and interpretation; however, requires professional experience. OGIPCP have the fastest application, easy to understand, and easily calculated indicators, requiring less experience. Qualitative data endorsed the quantitative results and showed IPCPE and IPCAF tools as the most accepted.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 assessment tools for IPCP have similar potential for use to support improvements in the IPCP. The IPCPE and IPCAF were considered advantageous on the effectiveness and fit-for-purpose compared to OGIPCP, despite the higher familiarity of participants with this tool.