Combination chemotherapy versus single agents followed by combination chemotherapy in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

New Treatment Options in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer

The past few years have witnessed a rapid shift in the treatments for patients with squamous cell lung cancers (SQCLCs) after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of a number of immune checkpoint inhibitors as second-line therapies for patients with non-small cell lung cancers. These series of approvals marked the first substantial improvement in overall survival for patients with SQCLC in over a decade. Further gains have been made more recently with the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibition in the first-line setting, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. These advances have, however, exposed existing deficiencies in the management of this disease. Despite a deeper understanding of the genomic alterations that characterize SQCLCs and years of trial work targeting these alterations, personalized therapies remain out of hand. Future studies will continue to focus on identifying targeted approaches to expand the treatment options for our patients.

Weekly Vinorelbine in Elderly Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Aims and background

Many lung cancers are diagnosed in patients over 65 years of age, but limited data are available on the tolerance and activity in elderly patients of chemotherapy protocols designed for adults.

Methods

We therefore activated a phase II study in patients aged 65 years or older affected by stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cancer in order to assess the tolerance and activity of vinorelbine administered weekly at a dose of 25 mg/m2.

Results

Since June 1992, 25 patients (20 males, 5 females; performance status ECOG, 0-2) have been included in the study and are evaluable for response and side effects. Two-hundred and twenty-eight cycles of therapy have been delivered (median/patient, 9 cycles). Four partial remissions (16%; 95% confidence interval 5–36%), 9 disease stabilizations, and 12 progressions have been observed. Median time to disease progression was 3 months, and median survival was 5 months (range, 2–25+). Mild or moderate side effects included leukopenia (6 cases), neutropenia (4 cases), anemia (4 cases), nausea (4 cases), infection (3 cases) and thoracic pain (2 cases). Grade III/IV toxicity consisted mainly of leukopenia and neutropenia observed respectively in 5 and in 7 patients. No significant difference in terms of tolerability has been observed for patients aged 65 to 70 with respect to patients aged 70 years or older.

Conclusions

The administration of vinorelbine in elderly patients does not seem to differ significantly in terms of response and tolerability from that recorded for adults. Selected elderly patients with good performance status and adequate organ function can be safely treated with systemic chemotherapy.

Phase II Study of Oral L-Leucovorin, 120-Hour Fluorouracil Infusion and Carboplatin in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Background

No effective chemotherapy has been developed for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Encouraging results have been reported with the combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil infusion. The aim of the study was to test the activity of oral L-leucovorin, carboplatin and fluorouracil infusion in untreated pancreatic cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

Patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma were treated with carboplatin (300 mg/m2 on day 1), L-leucovorin (5 mg/m2 twice a day on days 1-5), and fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2 as a 120-hr infusion on days 1-5), cycles being repeated every 21 days.

Results

Nine patients were included and were assessable for response and side effects. All patients had measurable disease and an ECOG performance status of 0-2. No patient achieved partial remission, 3 had stable disease, and 6 progressive disease. Median time to progression was 2 months (range, 2-8), and median survival was 4 months (range, 3-12). Toxicity consisted of mucositis, diarrhea and neutropenia.

Conclusions

Patients with metastatic pancreatic carcinoma do not benefit from this treatment schedule.

Carboplatin and Gemcitabine in the Palliative Treatment of Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Definitive Results of a Phase II Trial

Background

Cisplatin-containing regimens represent the gold standard in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but carboplatin is often preferred for its better toxic profile when palliation is the aim of the treatment. The synergistic effect and tolerability of carboplatin-gemcitabine combination are well known. In this phase II trial, we evaluated the activity and safety of a schedule with carboplatin and gemcitabine, defined in our previous phase I trial.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients with measurable stage IV non-small cell lung cancer were treated with carboplatin, AUC 4.5 mg/ml/min on day 1, and gemcitabine, 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days. All patients were treated until disease progression or intractable toxicity and were evaluated before each course of chemotherapy for toxicity and after every 3 courses for response.

Results

After a median follow-up of over 10 months, complete response, partial response, and stabilization of the disease were observed in 3 (8.1%), 9 (24.3%), and 15 patients (40.5%), respectively. Median time to progression was 7 months. At this writing, 27 patients have died, with a median survival of 10 months, and 29 (78.3%), 16 (43.2%), and 11 (29.7%) patients are alive after 6, 12, and 15 months of follow-up, respectively. Toxicity was mild, and mainly hematological, with a significant correlation with the number of courses of chemotherapy (P = 0.0003).

Conclusions

Our results are comparable with those reported in the literature and confirm the good activity and tolerability of the carboplatin-gemcitabine combination. Up to 4 courses of chemotherapy with carboplatin and gemcitabine may represent an interesting option in the palliative treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Effectiveness outcomes and health related quality of life impact of disease progression in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC treated in real-world community oncology settings: results from a prospective medical record registry study

Background

Treatment options for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the first line include platinum-based doublet therapy with or without bevacizumab. This study examined efficacy outcomes and patient reported outcomes (PROs) in a community oncology patient sample.

Methods

Advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients from 34 U.S. community oncology practices treated in first line with bevacizumab regimens (A platinum doublet; gemcitabine doublet; pemetrexed with platinum) or non-bevacizumab regimens (B platinum doublet; gemcitabine doublet; C pemetrexed with platinum) were recruited for this prospective study. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were accessed from routine care records. Three validated and widely used PRO measures of health related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptom burden were collected prospectively at each visit and up to one-year follow-up. Effectiveness outcomes were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) assessed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. PROs were analyzed with linear mixed model regression to examine changes over time, and the effect of disease progression.

Results

Of 147 patients in the study, 145 provided PRO data. Patients in treatment groups were: A (n = 66, 44.9%); B (n = 25, 17.0%); C (n = 56, 38.1%). A was associated with significantly longer OS than B (HR = 0.341, p = 0.0012), and significantly longer than C (HR = 0.602, p = 0.0354). PFS results were similar. Irrespective of regimen group and on 12/32 measures, patients showed significant and clinically meaningful worsening of symptoms and HRQOL at disease progression. After disease progression, the pattern of symptom and HRQOL change showed continued worsening.

Conclusions

Bevacizumab-containing regimens were associated with longer PFS and OS compared with non-bevacizumab regimens. PRO measures show disease progression is associated with worsening HRQOL. Delaying disease progression can sustain better HRQL and reduce symptom burden.

Cisplatin in the modern era: The backbone of first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

The treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be changing, but the cisplatin-based doublet remains the foundation of treatment for the majority of patients with advanced NSCLC. In this respect, changes in practice to various aspects of cisplatin use, such as administration schedules and the choice of methods and frequency of monitoring for toxicities, have contributed to an incremental improvement in patient management and experience. Chemoresistance, however, limits the clinical utility of this drug in patients with advanced NSCLC. Better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance, identification of predictive markers and the development of newer, more effective and less toxic platinum agents is required. In addition to maximising potential benefits from advances in molecular biology and associated therapeutics, modification of existing cisplatin-based treatments can still lead to improvements in patient outcomes and experiences.

50 Years of progress in the systemic therapy of non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer constitutes 85% to 90% of lung cancer and is the most common cause of cancer death. Over the past 50 years, substantial progress has been made in all aspects of lung cancer including screening, diagnostic evaluation, surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. This review focuses on the advances in systemic therapy during this half century.

Challenges for metals in medicine: how nanotechnology may help to shape the future

Encapsulation of the platinum(IV) prodrug mitaplatin in block copolymer nanoparticles increases drug circulation time in the blood and reduces accumulation in the kidneys, as reported by Lippard and colleagues in this issue of ACS Nano. Importantly, controlled drug release from the nanoparticles produces long-term anticancer efficacy, with the prospect of reduced side effects. We highlight the potential that such a strategy holds for the future development of metallodrugs. Metal coordination complexes offer the prospect of novel mechanisms of activity on account of their unique architectures, as well as potential activation mechanisms, including ligand substitution and metal- and ligand-centered redox properties. Nanoparticles offer exciting prospects for improving delivery, cell uptake, and targeting of metallodrugs, especially anticancer drugs, to make them more effective and safer.

Exploration of the medical periodic table: towards new targets

Metallodrugs offer potential for unique mechanisms of drug action based on the choice of the metal, its oxidation state, the types and number of coordinated ligands and the coordination geometry. We discuss recent progress in identifying new target sites and elucidating the mechanisms of action of anti-cancer, anti-bacterial, anti-viral, anti-parasitic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-neurodegenerative agents, as well as in the design of metal-based diagnostic agents. Progress in identifying and defining target sites has been accelerated recently by advances in proteomics, genomics and metal speciation analysis. Examples of metal compounds and chelating agents (enzyme inhibitors) currently in clinical use, clinical trials or preclinical development are highlighted.

WITHDRAWN: Second or third additional chemotherapy drug for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with advanced disease

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have demonstrated that adding a drug to a single-agent or to a two-agent regimen increased the tumor response rate in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although its impact on survival remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical benefit of adding a drug to a single-agent or two-agent chemotherapy regimen in terms of tumor response rate, survival, and toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

SEARCH METHODS

There were no language restrictions. Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were performed using the search terms non-small cell lung carcinoma/drug therapy, adenocarcinoma, large-cell carcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma, lung, neoplasms, clinical trial phase III, and randomized trial. Manual searches were also performed to find conference proceedings published between January 1982 and June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Data from all randomized controlled trials performed between 1980 and 2006 (published between January 1980 and June 2006) comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen or comparing a triplet regimen with a doublet regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent investigators reviewed the publications and extracted the data. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for the objective tumor response rate, one-year survival rate, and toxicity rate were calculated using the fixed-effect model. Pooled median ratios (MRs) for median survival also were calculated using the fixed-effect model. ORs and MRs lower than unity (< 1.0) indicate a benefit of a doublet regimen compared with a single-agent regimen (or a triplet regimen compared with a doublet regimen).

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five trials (13601 patients) were eligible. In the trials comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen, a significant increase was observed in tumor response (OR 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37 to 0.47, P < 0.001) and one-year survival (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.91, P < 0.001) in favor of the doublet regimen. The median survival ratio was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.89, P < 0.001). An increase also was observed in the tumor response rate (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.75, P < 0.001) in favor of the triplet regimen, but not for one-year survival (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.21, P = 0.88). The median survival ratio was 1.00 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.06, P = 0.97).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adding a second drug improved tumor response and survival rate. Adding a third drug had a weaker effect on tumor response and no effect on survival.

Prognostic Factors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Patient Characteristics and Type of Chemotherapy

Eleven prognostic factors were retrospectively analyzed in 270 newly diagnosed patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer including age, sex, performance status, histology, stage, smoking status, hemoglobin level, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), weight loss >5% in 3 months preceding therapy, number of involved organs, and type of first-line chemotherapy. Response rate was 35.6%, and median survival was 8.2 months (95% CI, 7.8 to 8.7) for the whole group. Age ≤60 years (P = .016), FEV1 ≥ 2L (P = .03), and the use of platinum/docetaxel (P < .0001) were significantly associated with an improved survival. Histology did not affect outcome in the absence of targeted therapies.

Chlorinated and diepoxy withanolides from Withania somnifera and their cytotoxic effects against human lung cancer cell line

Phytochemical studies on the aerial parts of Withania somnifera L. Dunal. (Solanaceae) led to the isolation of a chlorinated steroidal lactone (27-acetoxy-4β,6α-dihydroxy-5β-chloro-1-oxowitha-2,24-dienolide), a diepoxy withanolide (5β,6β,14α,15α-diepoxy-4β,27-dihydroxy-1-oxowitha-2,24-dienolide), and withaferin A. Their structures were elucidated by using spectroscopic techniques. All three compounds exhibited a growth inhibition and cytotoxic activity against human lung cancer cell line (NCI-H460), with withaferin A being the most potent (GI(50)=0.18 μg/mL and LC(50)=0.45 μg/mL) among three compounds tested.

Assessing tumor response to therapy

Most anticancer drugs are effective only in subgroups of patients, and our current understanding of tumor biology does not allow us to predict accurately which patient will benefit from a specific therapeutic regimen. Various techniques have, therefore, been developed for monitoring tumor response to therapy, but measuring tumor shrinkage on CT represents the current standard. Although response assessment on CT has been refined over many years, fundamental limitations remain. Interobserver variability in tumor size measurements is still high because of difficulties in delineating tumor tissue from secondary changes in the surrounding tissues. Furthermore, CT is inaccurate in differentiating viable tumor from necrotic or fibrotic tissue. Consequently, the degree of response may be underestimated on CT. Conversely, if tumor shrinkage is short lived and followed by rapid tumor regrowth, CT may overestimate the beneficial effects of a treatment. Finally, CT is limited in characterizing responses in tumors that do not change in size during therapy. Because the growth rate of untreated human tumors varies tremendously, an unchanged tumor size after some weeks of therapy may represent a drug effect but may also indicate a slowly growing tumor that was not affected by the applied therapy. Molecular imaging with PET and the glucose analogue (18)F-FDG PET has been shown to improve response assessment in several tumor types. In malignant lymphoma, international criteria for monitoring response to therapy have recently been revised, and the (18)F-FDG signal now plays a central role in defining tumor response. In a variety of solid tumors, single-center studies have indicated that (18)F-FDG PET may provide earlier or more accurate assessment of tumor response than CT, suggesting that (18)F-FDG PET could play a significant role in personalizing the treatment of malignant tumors. However, generally accepted criteria for response assessment in solid tumors are missing, which makes it frequently impossible to compare the results of different studies. International guidelines and criteria for response assessment by (18)F-FDG PET in solid tumors are, therefore, eagerly awaited.

Unusual DNA binding modes for metal anticancer complexes

DNA is believed to be the primary target for many metal-based drugs. For example, platinum-based anticancer drugs can form specific lesions on DNA that induce apoptosis. New platinum drugs can be designed that have novel modes of interaction with DNA, such as the trinuclear platinum complex BBR3464. Also it is possible to design inert platinum(IV) pro-drugs which are non-toxic in the dark, but lethal when irradiated with certain wavelengths of light. This gives rise to novel DNA lesions which are not as readily repaired as those induced by cisplatin, and provides the basis for a new type of photoactivated chemotherapy. Finally, newly emerging ruthenium(II) organometallic complexes not only bind to DNA coordinatively, but also by H-bonding and hydrophobic interactions triggered by the introduction of extended arene rings into their versatile structures. Intriguingly osmium (the heavier congener of ruthenium) reacts differently with DNA but can also give rise to highly cytotoxic organometallic complexes.

Mitomycin plus vinorelbine salvage chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective study

SUMMARY

We aimed to evaluate, in a phase II study, the efficacy of the mitomycin-vinorelbine combination in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, relapsing after taxane-based regimens, a situation in which no standard chemotherapy is currently available. Patients with NSCLC progressing or relapsing after taxane therapy, with a Karnofsky performance status 50-100, and without clinical or biological contra-indications, were given mitomycin (8 mg/m(2) day 1) plus vinorelbine (25mg/m(2) days 1 and 8) every 3 weeks. Responses were assessed every three cycles. Sixty-five eligible patients were registered between December 2000 and December 2005. Taxanes and cisplatin were previously administered in 100% and 88% of the patients, respectively. All but four received at least two previous chemotherapy regimens. Two hundred and twenty-two cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The main grade 3-4 toxicity was leucopenia, in 47% of the patients. Among 60 assessable patients, response rate was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4-21). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.7 weeks (95% CI: 8.4-11.1) and median survival (MST) was 28.4 weeks (95% CI: 23.0-34.8). Patients always progressing on all chemotherapy regimens administered before mitomycin-vinorelbine (primary failures) had shorter median PFS (8.1 weeks) than those having at least once partial response (PR) or no change (NC) (secondary failures) (10.4 weeks) (p=0.02). Respective MST were 23.7 weeks and 29.3 weeks (p=0.16). In conclusion, mitomycin-vinorelbine combination is a moderately active regimen in heavily pre-treated patients with NSCLC relapsing or progressing after taxanes and platinum-based chemotherapy. Its toxicity is limited.

Efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with mitomycin and vinorelbine for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy, toxicity and tolerability of chemotherapy with a combination of mitomycin and vinorelbine (M/V) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We enrolled 110 patients (median age 67 years) with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, who had no prior chemotherapy or progressive disease after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. 45 patients (41%) were > or =70 years old. All patients received vinorelbine 25mg/m(2) (d1,8) and mitomycin 8mg/m(2) (d1) every 3-4 weeks. Restaging was performed by CT-scan after every two courses M/V according to RECIST criteria.

RESULTS

M/V was well tolerated, even in patients with a poor performance status or > or =70 years Median progression free survival was 4.4 months. Median overall survival was 9.0 months with a 1-year survival rate of 39%. Partial response was observed in 15% and stable disease in 51% of patients. Both hematological and non-hematological toxicities were generally mild. CTC grade 3 toxicities observed included neutropenia in 3%, anemia in 3%, thrombocytopenia in 1% and suspected pneumonitis in 2% of patients. Except neutropenia in 2% and acute dyspnea in 1%, there were no other grade 4 toxicities and no treatment associated casualties. There was no relevant difference in outcome or toxicity between patients > or =70 and <70 years.

CONCLUSIONS

M/V seems to be a well-tolerated and effective chemotherapy regimen with low toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC. It seems to be an interesting option even for patients > or =70 years or with a reduced performance status.

Second or third additional chemotherapy drug for non-small cell lung cancer in patients with advanced disease

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have demonstrated that adding a drug to a single-agent or to a two-agent regimen increased the tumor response rate in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although its impact on survival remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical benefit of adding a drug to a single-agent or two-agent chemotherapy regimen in terms of tumor response rate, survival, and toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

There were no language restrictions. Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were performed using the search terms non-small cell lung carcinoma/drug therapy, adenocarcinoma, large-cell carcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma, lung, neoplasms, clinical trial phase III, and randomized trial. Manual searches were also performed to find conference proceedings published between January 1982 and June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Data from all randomized controlled trials performed between 1980 and 2006 (published between January 1980 and June 2006) comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen or comparing a triplet regimen with a doublet regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent investigators reviewed the publications and extracted the data. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for the objective tumor response rate, one-year survival rate, and toxicity rate were calculated using the fixed-effect model. Pooled median ratios (MRs) for median survival also were calculated using the fixed-effect model. ORs and MRs lower than unity (< 1.0) indicate a benefit of a doublet regimen compared with a single-agent regimen (or a triplet regimen compared with a doublet regimen).

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five trials (13601 patients) were eligible. In the trials comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen, a significant increase was observed in tumor response (OR 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37 to 0.47, P < 0.001) and one-year survival (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.91, P < 0.001) in favor of the doublet regimen. The median survival ratio was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.89, P < 0.001). An increase also was observed in the tumor response rate (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.75, P < 0.001) in favor of the triplet regimen, but not for one-year survival (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.21, P = 0.88). The median survival ratio was 1.00 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.06, P = 0.97).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Adding a second drug improved tumor response and survival rate. Adding a third drug had a weaker effect on tumor response and no effect on survival.

Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Brazil: treatment heterogeneity in routine clinical practice

Lung cancer is one of the main causes of cancer related deaths. Approximately three quarters of these tumors are non-small cell carcinomas. When diagnosed the majority of patients show the disease locally advanced or metastatic. The chemotherapy is the chosen therapy for patients with advanced lung cancer. The majority of published studies with chemotherapy are performed in academic centers under a strict control of research protocols.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the usual management of metastatic NSCLC patients outside of a clinical trial setting in three different oncologic centers in Brazil.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer admitted for treatment in three different Cancer Centers in Brazil. 564 patients from Brazilian public heath system and private/health insurance system were considered for the present study.

RESULTS

Among 564 patients in this study, 335 (59.4%) received chemotherapy. For all patients, 47 different regimens of chemotherapy were identified. The median follow-up time was eight months and the overall median survival of all patient population submitted to chemotherapy was 9.7 months.

DISCUSSION

There was a great heterogeneity in the regimens of drugs to treat metastatic NSCLC patients. The overall survival was significantly better for patients treated with first line chemotherapy compared to patients that only received best supportive care. Results of prospective randomized clinical trials should be carefully analyzed before transferred to the daily clinical practice.

A phase I dose-escalation study of S-1 plus carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the recommended dose and the safety profile of S-1 and carboplatin combination regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with S-1 and carboplatin. S-1 was administered orally twice daily for 14 days and carboplatin on day 1 of each cycle, and this was repeated every 4 weeks. Doses of each drug were planned as follows: level 1, 5/65; level 2, 5/80; level 3, 6/80 [carboplatin (area under the curve, mg/ml/min)/S-1 (mg/m/day)]. The dose-limiting toxicity of the regimen was assessed during the first chemotherapy cycle. Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. The main grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities observed during the first cycle were neutropenia (41%), thrombocytopenia (41%) and transaminase elevation. Two of three patients in level 2 had dose-limiting toxicity and this level was considered the maximum tolerated dose. Level 1 was selected as the recommended dose. Objective responses were seen in four patients (response rate 33%). The combination of S-1 plus carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Chemotherapy dose--response relationships in non-small cell lung cancer and implied resistance mechanisms

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized excess resistance factor ("active resistance") gives a dose--response curve (DRC) shoulder, deficiency of a factor required for drug sensitivity ("saturable passive resistance") gives a DRC terminal plateau, and alteration of a factor gives decreased DRC slope.

METHOD

We used response rates from published non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical studies to estimate mean percent tumor cell kill in each study (assuming cell kill is proportional to tumor volume change) and performed regression and meta-regression analyses of percent cell survival and patient survival vs planned dose-intensity.

RESULTS

As single agents, cell kill approached that of combinations only at highest doses. While DRC shape varied between single agents, DRCs for all combinations tested flattened at higher doses. Patient median survival times also failed to vary significantly with dose for any combination.

CONCLUSIONS

DRC flattening at higher doses suggests therapy efficacy is limited by deficiency/saturation of factors required for cell killing. Based on this and other clinical observations, we hypothesize: (1) active resistance may modulate cell killing at lower doses, but ability to overcome this by increasing doses is limited by saturable passive resistance (e.g. by non-cycling cells). (2) Cells surviving initial chemotherapy may upregulate active resistance mechanisms (permitting growth despite therapy). (3) If active resistance mechanisms are insufficient for growth/survival, cells may survive until therapy cessation by downregulating metabolism/cycling, becoming temporarily quiescent. This could help explain broad cross-resistance between agents and would imply that improved targeting of non-cycling cells will be required for major improvement in therapy efficacy.

A Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Weekly Docetaxel and Carboplatin in Elderly Patients With Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD), and the safety profile of a weekly docetaxel and carboplatin combination regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC, >70 years of age, performance status (ECOG) 0-2, with adequate bone marrow, renal, liver and cardiac function, were treated with docetaxel and carboplatin. Docetaxel was given at escalated doses starting from 20 mg/m2/wk on days 1, 8, and 15, with an increment of 5 mg/m2 followed by carboplatin also administered at escalated doses starting from AUC 4 to 6 (mg/ml/min); the regimen was administered every 4 weeks. The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of the regimen was assessed during the first chemotherapy cycle.

RESULTS

There were 25 patients enrolled in this study and assessed for safety. Neutropenia was the main DLT of the regimen; grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 5 patients (20%). Hematologic toxicities were mild, and included grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient (4%) and grade 3 anemia in 1 patient (4%). Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild, and included grade 3 constipation in 1 patient (4%) and grade 3 renal disorder in 1 patient (4%). Objective responses were seen in 9 patients (response rate 36%).

CONCLUSIONS

The MTD was carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 and docetaxel 30 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15; therefore, the RD for the phase II study is carboplatin AUC 5 and docetaxel 30 mg/m2. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. This regimen merits further investigation in phase II trials.

Changes in the natural history of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC)--comparison of outcomes and characteristics in patients with advanced NSCLC entered in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trials before and after 1990

BACKGROUND

Demographic factors and treatment regimens were evaluated in relation to differences in outcome between patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were diagnosed and treated on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II and III trials from 1981 to 1990 and from 1991 to 2000.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 6 advanced NSCLC trials were identified between 1981 and 1990, and 3 trials were identified after 1990. Patient characteristics (n = 3398 patients) and other clinical outcomes were analyzed, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Patients who entered on trials after 1990 more likely were women, received a cisplatin-containing regimen, had a performance status of 0 or 1, had Stage IIIB (vs. Stage IV) disease, had tumors with adenocarcinoma histology, had weight loss < or = 10%, and had pulmonary-only metastases (although more total metastases and brain metastases) compared with patients who were diagnosed before 1990. OS was longer post-1990 than pre-1990 (8.2 months vs. 5.8 months pre-1990), and PFS was longer post-1990 (3.5 months vs. 2.6 months pre-1990; P<.001 for both). In addition, the median interval from the date of disease progression to death increased by nearly 62% in the later decade.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved survival in more recent NSCLC trials was explained in part by the enrollment of patients with more favorable prognostic factors. A change in the natural history of the disease was reflected by some of these changes, including increased numbers of women with the disease and changes in the patterns of metastases. Changes in eligibility criteria also accounted for some improvements in prognostic factors and improved second line therapies in the later decade. Thus, the survival improvements are likely to be multifactorial, with improved therapies also playing a major role.

A phase I–II study of bi-weekly gemcitabine and irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer after prior taxane + platinum-based regimens

PURPOSE

Treatment options in patients with recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of poor activity of most agents after failure of platinum-based therapy. In the present phase I-II study, we evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of bi-weekly gemcitabine (GEM) + irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with relapsed NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC, WHO-performance status (PS) </= 2, prior taxane/platinum-based chemotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered in a dose-escalated fashion in subgroups of 3-6 patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered as follows: CPT-11 150 or 180 mg/m(2) followed by GEM 1,200-1,800 mg/m(2), both on days 1 + 15, recycled every 28 days in four dose levels (DLs).

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients entered the phase I and II part of the study (phase I: 12-phase II: 37 + 3 at DL-3), and 40 patients were evaluable for a response in phase II and all for toxicity: median age, 61 years (range 36-74); PS, 1 (0-2); gender, 43 males/6 females-histologies; adenocarcinoma, 25; squamous, 20; large cell, 4. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes, 38; bone, 5; liver, 4; brain, 3; lung nodules, 14; adrenals, 13; other, 3. All patients had prior taxane + platinum-based treatment, and 42 patients had prior docetaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin/or-carboplatin regimens. DLT was observed at DL-4 and included 2/3 cases with grade 3 diarrhea-1/3 of these with febrile neutropenia. The recommended DL for phase II evaluation was DL3: GEM, 1,500 + CPT-11-180 mg/m(2). Objective responses in phase II were PR, 6/40 [15%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5-31%]; stable disease, 16/40 (40%; 95% CI, 21-53%); and progressive disease, 18/40 (45%; 95% CI, 28.5-62.5%). The median time-to-progression was 4 months (range 1-12) and median survival 7 months (range 1.5-42 +), while 1-year survival was 20%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 18% of patients (6% grade 4) and 6% incidence of febrile neutropenia. No Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were seen, grade 3 diarrhea in 6% of patients and grade 2 in 15% of patients, while other grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were never encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

Bi-weekly GEM + CPT-11 is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC failing prior taxane + platinum regimens, and represents an effective and convenient combination to apply in the palliative treatment of relapsed NSCLC particularly after failure of first-line docetaxel + platinum-based regimens.

Docetaxel and mitomycin as second-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of the combination of docetaxel and mitomycin C as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were included in this phase II trial. All patients had been previously treated with a platinum-based regimen. Treatment consisted of docetaxel (75 mg/m2) followed by mitomycin C (8 mg/m2) on day 1, every 21 days. Patients received a minimum of three courses unless progressive disease was detected.

RESULTS

A total of 190 courses of docetaxel-mitomycin C were administered (median five courses per patient). This combination was well tolerated with grade 3-4 toxicity experienced with the following frequency: neutropenia in five patients (13%), fatigue in four (11%), anaemia, thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting and peripheral neuropathy in one each (3%). Three of 38 patients had a partial response (8%, 95% confidence interval 2.6-21.6%), 14 patients (37%) experienced stabilization of disease and 21 (55%) had disease progression. Median time to progression was 3.6 months. Overall median survival was 10.4 months, with the 1-year actuarial survival rate being 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of mitomycin C to docetaxel as second-line therapy in NSCLC is well tolerated but does not seem to improve the response rate.

Gemcitabine and carboplatin: is this the best combination for non-small cell lung cancer?

Approximately 30-40% of non-small cell lung cancer patients will present with metastatic disease, and its associated poor prognosis. Chemotherapy has an established palliative role within late-stage disease, but is also being used increasingly in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Platinum-based chemotherapy has been shown to produce definite improvements in efficacy and quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer patients, and is now the standard of care. Carboplatin has similar biochemical properties to those of cisplatin. However, carboplatin has much less renal, otologic, neurologic and upper gastrointestinal toxicities than cisplatin, and treatment can be conveniently delivered in an out-patient setting. Furthermore, platinum combinations with third-generation cytotoxics have shown additional gains in survival rates. Gemcitabine and carboplatin is a well-tolerated regime. Recent meta- and cost analyses have discovered that gemcitabine-based regimes may have an advantage over other third-generation agent platinum combinations. This article reviews the evidence demonstrating that gemcitabine-carboplatin is effective, convenient and cost effective.

A Phase II Study of the Docetaxel- Ifosfamide-Carboplatin Combination in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

In the present phase II study we evaluated the docetaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin (DICb) combination in the outpatient setting in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages IIIB/IV), WHO performance status (PS) <2, and no prior chemotherapy were eligible. Chemotherapy drug doses were: docetaxel: 80 mg/m2, ifosfamide: 3.5 g/m2, and carboplatin at a target area under the curve of 5 (based on Calvert's formula), all on day 1, followed by prophylactic G-CSF.

RESULTS

Fourty patients were entered and all are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 64 (48-72); PS: 1 (0-1); gender: 29 males/11 females; stages: IIIB: 13 (33%), IV: 27 (67%). Metastatic sites at diagnosis included: lymph nodes: 25; bone: 7; liver: 4; brain: 5; lung nodules: 13; adrenals: 6. Responses were as follows: 22/40 [55%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 54-81%] evaluable patients responded: 4 complete responses, 18 partial responses, 11 had stable disease, and 7 had progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (range 2-14 months), median time to progression 9 months (range 2-18 months) and median overall survival 11 months (range 3-46+ months). 1-year survival was 47.5%. Grade 3/4 toxicities included: neutropenia 28/40, with 12 developing grade 4 and 12% febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia grade 3: 3/40 and grade 4: 1/40, no grade 3 neuropathy, grade 1 CNS toxicity in 3, no renal toxicity, 8 grade 2 diarrhea and 4 grade 3 vomiting.

CONCLUSION

In the present phase II study the DICb combination yielded important activity and good tolerability in advanced NSCLC.

A Phase II Study of the Docetaxel–Carboplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The efficacy of the docetaxel-carboplatin combination chemotherapy was studied in various phase II studies. Based on these data we aimed to test the regimen in previously untreated patients with advanced advanced non-smoking lung cancer (NSCLC) with docetaxel 80 mg/m2 a standard dose of carboplatin at AUC = 5, in an attempt to define the efficacy and tolerability of the combination in an open-label phase II study. Patients with histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC stage IIIB and IV were candidates for the present study. Docetaxel was administered at 80 mg/m2 over 1 h by intravenous (IV) infusion followed by carboplatin AUC = 5 in 30 min IV infusion, both on day 1, and recycled every 21 days. Sixty patients received 263 courses of therapy in total; 231/263 (88%) were administered according to the planned doses, and 48/60 (80%) patients received chemotherapy without decrement of the dose; 32/263 (12%) of the courses were administered with a 10%-30% dose reduction. Complete responses (CR) were seen in 5 patients (8.3%) and partial responses (PR) in 16 patients (26.7%) for an overall response rate of 35%. Median duration of response was 7.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI)-7.1-7.9], time to progression (TIP) 11.5 months (95% CI-8.2-14.8), median overall survival (OS) 15.0 months (95% CI-10.8-19.2). One-year survival was 61.7%. Toxicity was acceptable; it was calculated according to the administered cycles and was mainly neutropenia: grade 3, 9% and grade 4, 2%; anemia: grade 3, 8%; nausea and vomiting: grade 3, 8%. The outpatient regimen of docetaxel-carboplatin is effective with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Activity of carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer pre-treated with a non-platinum combination

To assess the efficacy of carboplatin when used as a single agent in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who are refractory to chemotherapy with a non-platinum combination, we recruited patients (n=40) NSCLC patients, 36 of whom were males, with an overall median age of 59 years (range 39-79) and Karnofsky Performance Status of 70% (range 60-90%). At baseline, the patients had a median of one disease site (range 1-3) and had received a median of one prior regimen (range 1-2). Carboplatin was administered (i.v.; AUC=6) every 3 weeks until disease progression or non-acceptable toxicity was reached. In total 169 cycles were administered (median 4 cycles/patient; range 1-8). Main toxicities were grade 2-3 anemia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (22.5% of patients). Overall clinical response rate was 10% (4 partial responses); 26 patients (65%) had stable disease and 8 (20%) had disease progression. Median time to progression and median survival time were 90 and 187 days, respectively. One year survival rate was 13%. We conclude that carboplatin shows minimal toxicity with a discrete anti-tumor activity in patients with NSCLC and who are refractory to non-platinum combinations.

Induction Paclitaxel/Carboplatin Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy for Unresectable Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Limited-Access Study (CALGB 9534)

BACKGROUND

This phase II cooperative group study of patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer was designed to treat patients with induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) followed by concurrent chemotherapy with the same chemotherapy plus thoracic irradiation to 66 Gy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All enrolled patients were scheduled to receive 2 cycles of induction PC at conventional doses. All nonprogressing patients were subsequently treated with concurrent chemoradiation, including 7 weekly doses of PC and once-daily thoracic irradiation. The eligibility criteria allowed treatment of an expanded population of patients, unrestricted by previous weight loss.

RESULTS

Despite the fact that 22% of patients had experienced > 5% weight loss in the preceding 6 months, 23 of the 40 eligible patients (58%) responded to the overall regimen. A 3-year failure-free survival rate of 15% and a 3-year overall survival rate of 27% were achieved. The 3-year overall survival rate is consistent with landmark cooperative group results for the combined modality treatment of a more highly selected patient population.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility of this therapeutic approach in a cooperative group setting and inclusive of patients who were representative of the general population of stage III lung cancer patients was established.

Sequence effect of docetaxel and carboplatin on toxicity, tumor response and pharmacokinetics in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a phase I study of two sequences

PURPOSE

To investigate sequence effects on toxicity, tumor response and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and carboplatin, together with a determination of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for each schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 46 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive docetaxel before (schedule A) or after (schedule B) carboplatin. The dose levels studied were [docetaxel (mg/m(2))/carboplatin (mg x min/ml)] 50/5, 60/5, 60/6, 60/7, and 70/6. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 or 4 weeks unless disease progression or undue toxicity occurred.

RESULTS

Of the 46 patients, 44 were assessable for toxicity and received a total of 84 cycles. The major dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. When the docetaxel dose was 60 mg/m(2), the carboplatin MTD was deemed to be AUC 7 in both schedules. When the docetaxel dose was escalated to 70 mg/m(2), the carboplatin MTD was reached in schedule A, and the dose-limiting toxicity was not observed in schedule B. Tumor response was observed in 4 of 22 patients (18%) with schedule A and 8 of 19 (42%) with schedule B. Clearances of both drugs were not affected by sequence: 111.2+/-26.8 ml/min and 107.8+/-29.0 ml/min for carboplatin (P=0.69), and 26.7+/-8.3 l/h and 22.8+/-7.0 l/h for docetaxel (P=0.19) in schedules A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin AUC 6 followed by docetaxel 70 mg/m(2) was a favorable regimen for phase II study because of likely lower toxicity and a potentially higher response rate than the reverse sequence schedule. The mechanism of the sequence effects on toxicity and tumor response could not be explained by the pharmacokinetic interactions.

Paclitaxel: a hope for advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

Recent studies have shown that paclitaxel (Taxol); Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Princeton, NJ) is an active agent in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Early trials in patients with advanced NSCLC utilised a 24 h infusion schedule and reported objective tumour responses in 21 - 24% of patients. Shorter infusion schedules have equivalent efficacy, and combined results from 14 separate trials of single agent paclitaxel in advanced NSCLC show an overall tumour response rate of 26%. Alternative schedules of paclitaxel from the traditional regimen every three weeks are under active investigation, but it is premature to assess whether these will yield improved efficacy for patients with advanced NSCLC. A single multicentre randomised trial of paclitaxel versus best supportive care in advanced NSCLC showed a significant survival advantage for the chemotherapy arm. Two large randomised Phase III trials have shown that paclitaxel and cisplatin is modestly more effective than cisplatin and podophyllotoxin combinations. The addition of cisplatin or carboplatin to paclitaxel results in higher response rates than for each of the drugs as single agents, but it is unclear whether the combinations yield superior survival or quality of life compared to single agent paclitaxel, or to other paclitaxel-containing regimens.

Innovative sequence of docetaxel–gemcitabine based on preclinical data in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer: a phase I study

Based on our previous preclinical data, a phase I study was designed to investigate the tolerability of a novel sequence, docetaxel (DOC)-gemcitabine (GEM), in the treatment of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical study: We evaluated the cytotoxicity of DOC and GEM on NSCLC cell lines and assessed the type of interaction between drug activities following different treatment schemes. Clinical study: Fifteen patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC received DOC (day 1) and GEM (days 3 and 8) every 21 days. Dose escalation of both agents was used to identify the maximum tolerated dose. The study was closed at the fifth dose level due to the occurrence of three dose-limiting toxicities: grade 4 febrile neutropoenia, persistent grade 2 fever and grade 3 diarrhoea. The most frequent toxicity was neutropoenia. Non haematological toxicities were diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, mucositis and alopoecia. Of the 14 evaluable patients, 1 complete response, 4 partial responses, 4 stable diseases and 5 disease progressions were observed. Based on the results of the present study, a phase II trial is ongoing using the fourth dose levels.

Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated with high-dose hyperfractionated radiation therapy and concurrent low-dose daily chemotherapy with or without weekend chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of 301 patients

We investigated the outcome in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with high-dose hyperfractionated radiation therapy (Hfx RT) and concurrent chemotherapy (CHT) consisting of carboplatin (C) and etoposide (E). During three prospective randomized phase III and one prospective phase II study enrolling a total of 536 patients, 301 patients were treated with high-dose Hfx RT (69.6 Gy) and either low-dose daily CE (50 mg each) (n = 163) or daily CE (30 mg each) accompanied by "weekend" CE (100 mg of each on Saturdays and Sundays) (n = 138). The median survival time for all 301 patients is 22 months and 5-year survival is 24%. Median local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) time is 21 months and 5-year local recurrence-free survival is 32%. The median time to distant metastasis is 25 months, and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) is 35%. Only the type/schedule of CHT administration did not influence overall survival, LRFS, and DMFS. On multivariate analyses using these three endpoints, age stage, interfraction interval, and type/schedule of CHT administration did not predict survival, LRFS, and DMFS, while gender, KPS, and weight loss did. Only high grade hematologic toxicity was more frequent in weekend CHT group. High dose Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily CE with or without weekend CE is an active treatment approach in stage III NSCLC that led to high overall survival, LRFS, and DMFS rates.

Phase II Study of Pemetrexed-Gemcitabine Combination in Patients with Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Cisplatin is one of the most active agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is also known for significant toxicity, which makes it unsuitable for certain patients. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a promising cisplatin-free combination, gemcitabine plus pemetrexed, in NSCLC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Chemo-naive patients with inoperable NSCLC were eligible for this study. Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) was given intravenously on days 1 and 8, followed by intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) on day 8. After inclusion of 13 patients, folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation was added to lower pemetrexed-induced toxicity. Quality of life was assessed with the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale.

RESULTS

Sixty patients enrolled; 58 were evaluable for response. All patients had a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. Eighty-seven percent had stage IV disease. Nine patients had a confirmed partial response [overall response rate, 15.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.3-27.4%]. Twenty-nine (50.0%) patients had stable disease. Median overall survival was 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.0 months), with a 1- and 2-year overall survival of 42.6% (95% CI, 30.0-55.3%) and 18.5% (95% CI, 7.9-29.1%). Median progression-free survival was 5.0 months. Median response duration was 3.3 months. There were no deaths attributed to treatment. Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (61.7%), febrile neutropenia (16.7%), fatigue (23.3%), and elevations of aspartate aminotransferase (15.0%) and alanine aminotransferase (20.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

This combination had good tolerance and achieved promising overall survival with extended 1- and 2-year survival rates. This cisplatin-free regimen warrants further evaluation in randomized trials.

Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a perspective on the recent advances and the experience with gefitinib

Worldwide, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality and, until screening detects early disease, treatment for the majority of patients will consist of radiation therapy, chemotherapy or combinations thereof. Modern mono and doublet chemotherapy regimens have translated into modest increases in life expectancy and improved quality of life, but at the expense of systemic and pulmonary adverse events (AEs). There is a great unmet need to provide effective therapy for advanced NSCLC that does not have the toxicity burden of conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Novel drugs that inhibit a range of growth factor receptors, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib ('Iressa') and erlotinib ('Tarceva') or the monoclonal antibody cetuximab ('Erbitux'), have recently been evaluated. Having demonstrated antitumour activity and rapid symptom improvement in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC, gefitinib was approved in the USA, Japan and other countries. Gefitinib is well tolerated with a low incidence of grade 3/4 AEs. Interstitial lung disease has been reported in a small number of patients receiving gefitinib, although this may be attributed to other treatments and conditions. Nevertheless, although the use of novel treatments requires vigilance for unexpected AEs such as pulmonary toxicity, in this area of high unmet clinical need, the benefits outweigh the risks in patients for whom no other proven effective treatment exists.

A less intensive combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients who have aged 60 years or more and has a poor performance status

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the response, survival, and toxicities of a less intensive combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin, which is used in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients older than 60 years of age including those with a poor performance status.

METHODS

Thirty patients received 135 mg/m2 of paclitaxel on day 1, and carboplatin was administered to the patients on day 1 every 4 weeks over an area under the concentration-time curve of 6.

RESULTS

The response rate was 40%, the median overall survival was 9.1 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 14 months), and the 1 year survival rate was 31%. The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 3.1 to 12.2 months). In addition, the toxicities were generally mild and reversible.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that a less intensive combination of paclitaxel/carboplatin is active and well tolerated in advanced NSCLC patients who are older than 60 years including those with a poor PS 3-4.

Phase II study of alternating chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We assessed the use of alternating drugs with differing mechanisms of action as treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the shape of a dose-response curve would be determined by the major mechanisms of resistance of a cancer to the drug being studied. Assessment of data from published clinical trials suggested that if our hypothesis were correct resistance of non-small cell lung cancer to most agents is due to "saturable passive" resistance mechanisms (non-competitive inhibition of drug effect due to deficiency of a factor required for drug effect) rather than to "active" resistance mechanisms (competitive inhibition of drug effect due to excess of a factor) or to "non-saturable passive resistance (due to factor alteration or mutation). Using drugs with differing mechanisms of action is a strategy that might be of value against passive resistance.

METHOD

In patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, we used four alternating cisplatin-based regimens. In each regimen, cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) was given iv on day 1 of each course. The regimens were: cisplatin + vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) days 1, 8 and 15, cisplatin + paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) day 1 iv over 1h, and cisplatin + etoposide 100 mg/m(2) po days 1-6. Patients were assigned randomly to different regimen sequences. Patients first received 1 course of each of these 4 regimens, then received 1 further course of each of single agent vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel and etoposide (at the same doses as in courses 1-4), without cisplatin. (Cisplatin was omitted from courses 5-8 to limit cumulative toxicity.) Change in tumor size was measured after each course.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were entered. One patient achieved complete remission and nine achieved partial remissions, for an objective response rate of 28% (95% confidence intervals, 13-43%). Nineteen patients (53%) (95% confidence intervals, 37-69%) had stable disease. Eleven patients had growth of >10% on one regimen followed by tumor shrinkage of >10% on a later one. Median survival was 8.1 months, 1-year survival was 28% and 2-year survival was 6%. No unexpected toxicity was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of four alternating regimens is feasible in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Response rates and survival times were comparable to those observed for standard chemotherapy approaches, suggesting that this strategy does not offer any major advantage. We plan to explore the hypothesis that this approach failed since tumor cells surviving first exposure to chemotherapy rapidly down-regulate their ability to undergo apoptosis.

Basic treatment considerations: chemotherapy

Lung cancer represents a major global health problem, with more than a million deaths reported each year. Because there are no effective screening tools to date, diagnosis of the disease at an advanced stage is a common feature. Over the past 20 years, elegant strides have been made in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC. Several novel chemotherapy agents that are efficacious and possess favorable toxicity profiles have been developed recently. In addition to evaluating novel combinations, alternative schedules to improve toxicity profiles are subjects of clinical trials. Much work needs to be done, however, to improve the outcome for patients with lung cancer. Chemotherapy extends life and improves quality of life for patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. Combined modality therapy with radiation and chemotherapy improves the outcome for patients with locally advanced NSCLC and is associated with a curative potential. Molecularly targeted therapies are under rigorous evaluation, although the initial results have been disappointing. In the upcoming years, we will learn effective means to incorporate molecularly targeted therapies to existing treatment paradigms in lung cancer.

Concurrent radiochemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer

Current evidence suggests that concurrent RT/CHT is the standard of treatment in patients with locally advanced, inoperable NSCLC. This treatment approach, however, bears risk of increased toxicity and, therefore, must be carefully balanced regarding the choice of patients suitable for such an intervention. Newer RT technologies, third-generation CHT drugs, and widely used radioprotectors represent the current framework for numerous clinical studies that ultimately will help optimize the treatment of this disease.

Gemcitabine and carboplatin in advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a review

Both gemcitabine and carboplatin have demonstrated activity in advanced non small-cell lung cancer. The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has demonstrated equivalent or superior efficacy to other commonly used agents and two-drug combinations, and a recent Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial suggested that this regimen may have a slight advantage over other regimens in time to progression. The substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin offers the opportunity for a more well-tolerated regimen, and the combination of gemcitabine with carboplatin has now been studied in various clinical phase I and II trials. The administration of gemcitabine on a day-1-and-8 regimen with carboplatin appears to have a more favorable toxicity profile, especially with regard to platelet toxicity. Therefore, a number of ongoing trials, both phase II and phase III, are investigating the activity of this combination in locally advanced and metastatic non small-cell lung cancer. These trials will help define the role of this active and well-tolerated new regimen and, ultimately, its ability to be incorporated into multimodality therapy as well as with the new biologic agents for the treatment of non small-cell lung cancer.