Phase I-II study of high-dose epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Identification of cardiotoxicity related to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatments: A systematic review

Introduction: In the last few decades, there has been a rapid development in cancer therapies and improved detection strategies, hence the death rates caused by cancer have decreased. However, it has been reported that cardiovascular disease has become the second leading cause of long-term morbidity and fatality among cancer survivors. Cardiotoxicity from anticancer drugs affects the heart's function and structure and can occur during any stage of the cancer treatments, which leads to the development of cardiovascular disease. Objectives: To investigate the association between anticancer drugs for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cardiotoxicity as to whether: different classes of anticancer drugs demonstrate different cardiotoxicity potentials; different dosages of the same drug in initial treatment affect the degree of cardiotoxicity; and accumulated dosage and/or duration of treatments affect the degree of cardiotoxicity. Methods: This systematic review included studies involving patients over 18 years old with NSCLC and excluded studies in which patients' treatments involve radiotherapy only. Electronic databases and registers including Cochrane Library, National Cancer Institute (NCI) Database, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register were systematically searched from the earliest available date up until November 2020. A full version protocol of this systematic review (CRD42020191760) had been published on PROSPERO. Results: A total of 1785 records were identified using specific search terms through the databases and registers; 74 eligible studies were included for data extraction. Based on data extracted from the included studies, anticancer drugs for NSCLC that are associated with cardiovascular events include bevacizumab, carboplatin, cisplatin, crizotinib, docetaxel, erlotinib, gemcitabine and paclitaxel. Hypertension was the most reported cardiotoxicity as 30 studies documented this cardiovascular adverse event. Other reported treatment-related cardiotoxicities include arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, coronary artery disease, heart failure, ischemia, left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial infarction, palpitations, and tachycardia. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review have provided a better understanding of the possible association between cardiotoxicities and anticancer drugs for NSCLC. Whilst variation is observed across different drug classes, the lack of information available on cardiac monitoring can result in underestimation of this association. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020191760, identifier PROSPERO CRD42020191760.

Increasing dose of Continuous Infusion Ifosfamide and Fixed dose of Bolus Epirubicin in Soft Tissue Sarcomas. A Study of the Italian Group on Rare Tumors

Purpose

To evaluate the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of ifosfamide when given as a continuous infusion and in combination with fixed doses of bolus 4′-epidoxorubicin in advanced previously untreated adult soft tissue sarcoma patients.

Methods

Treatment consisted of epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2 days one and two, and ifosfamide, 1.5 g/m2 every 12 hrs as a 72-hr infusion, at the first level. Further levels of ifosfamide were defined as increments of 12 hrs of the same infusion program. G-CSF 300 μg/die was administered from days +7 to +14. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: G4 leukopenia or thrombocytopenia of ≥5 days; any G3 neuro or nephrotoxicity; G4 toxicity of any kind. Patients had to complete at least 2 consecutive cycles, and MTD was defined as the level in which 20% of patients developed a DLT; 10-15 patients were entered in each level.

Results

First level: overall, 13 patients entered, 3 were not assessable for MTD, and only one developed a DLT. Second level: 18 patients entered, 3 were not assessable for MTD. Hematologic DLT was observed in 3/15 assessable patients. Therefore, the MTD was found at the ifosfamide level of 10.5 g/m2 given in 84 hrs. Eight patients of 29 assessable for response achieved an objective response: 1 complete and 7 partial. The overall response rate was 28% (95% CI: 13-47%).

Conclusions

If we accept 4-day G4 leukopenia as a reliable cutoff for safety, ifosfamide intensification cannot be substantially exploited over already available schedules with the combination of ifosfamide and anthracyclines.

Phase II Study of the Activity and Tolerability of a Combined Regimen of High-Dose Epirubicin and Cisplatin in Stage IIIb and IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

AIM

To explore the feasibility and activity of a combined regimen of high-dose epirubicin and cisplatin as an alternative to current treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHOD

Forty-four patients with stage IIIb or IV NSCLC, median Karnofsky index 90, were enrolled. Epirubicin (60 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 2 and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. A hematopoietic growth factor (G-CSF) was used only for patients reaching codified nadir count values.

RESULTS

A total of 130 cycles were administered with a mean of 2.9 cycles per patient. Of 41 assessable patients one showed a complete response and 15 had partial responses (overall response rate, 39%). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and grade 3 hemoglobin toxicity were seen in 40% and 14%, respectively, of the administered cycles. The most common nonhematologic toxic events were nausea and vomiting, mucositis, anorexia, and asthenia.

CONCLUSIONS

This epirubicin-cisplatin regimen seemed effective and was generally well tolerated, and therefore suitable for use in an outpatient setting.

Revisiting Dosing Regimen Using Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Mathematical Modeling: Densification and Intensification of Combination Cancer Therapy

Controlling effects of drugs administered in combination is particularly challenging with a densified regimen because of life-threatening hematological toxicities. We have developed a mathematical model to optimize drug dosing regimens and to redesign the dose intensification-dose escalation process, using densified cycles of combined anticancer drugs. A generic mathematical model was developed to describe the main components of the real process, including pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy pharmacodynamics, and non-hematological toxicity risk. This model allowed for computing the distribution of the total drug amount of each drug in combination, for each escalation dose level, in order to minimize the average tumor mass for each cycle. This was achieved while complying with absolute neutrophil count clinical constraints and without exceeding a fixed risk of non-hematological dose-limiting toxicity. The innovative part of this work was the development of densifying and intensifying designs in a unified procedure. This model enabled us to determine the appropriate regimen in a pilot phase I/II study in metastatic breast patients for a 2-week-cycle treatment of docetaxel plus epirubicin doublet, and to propose a new dose-ranging process. In addition to the present application, this method can be further used to achieve optimization of any combination therapy, thus improving the efficacy versus toxicity balance of such a regimen.

Amrubicin for the treatment of advanced lung cancer

Although the advancement of the chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer is remarkable in recent years, it is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, some new agents or a new treatment strategy for lung cancer is required. Amrubicin is a totally synthetic anthracycline anticancer drug that acts as a potent topoisomerase II inhibitor. Recently, amrubicin has been approved in Japan for the treatment of small- and non-small cell lung cancers and some clinical trials about amrubicin were conducted in Japan, and promising results have been reported for the treatment of small cell lung cancer in particular. The preclinical, pharmacology and clinical data of amrubicin for the treatment of advanced lung cancer are reviewed.

Amrubicin for non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer

Amrubicin is a totally synthetic anthracycline anticancer drug and a potent topoisomerase II inhibitor. Recently, amrubicin was approved in Japan for the treatment of small- and non-small-cell lung cancers (SCLC and NSCLC). Here, we review the efficacy and toxicities of amrubicin monotherapy and amrubicin in combination with cisplatin for extensive-disease SCLC (ED-SCLC), and of amrubicin monotherapy for advanced NSCLC, as observed in the clinical trials. Recommended dosage for previously untreated advanced NCSLC was 45 mg/m2/day by intravenous administration for 3 days. Dose-limiting toxicities were leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal disturbance. Response rate was 27.9% for advanced NSCLC, and 75.8% for ED-SCLC with a median survival time (MST) of 11.7 months. Recommended dosage of amrubicin was 40 mg/m2/day in combination with cisplatin at 60 mg/m2/day, with MST of 13.6 months and 1-year survival rate of 56.1%. In sensitive or refractory relapsed SCLC, response rate was 52 and 50%, progression-free survival was 4.2 and 2.6 months, overall survival was 11.6 and 10.3 months, and 1-year survival rate was 46 and 40%, respectively. These results are promising for the treatment of both NSCLC and SCLC. Further clinical trials will clarify the status of amrubicin in the treatment of lung cancer.

Multicenter phase II study of amrubicin, 9-amino-anthracycline, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (Study 1): West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) trial

PURPOSE

Amrubicin is a novel 9-aminoanthracycline. This multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-one previously untreated patients with stage III or IV NSCLC were entered this study. The patients were required to have cytologically or histologically proven measurable NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, and adequate organ function. Amrubicin was administered by daily intravenous injection at 45 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. At least 3 cycles of treatment were administered to each patient.

RESULTS

All 61 patients registered in this trial were eligible and assessable for efficacy and toxicity. Of them, 17 patients achieved objective responses, consisting of one complete response and 16 partial responses, and the overall response rate was 27.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.1% to 40.8%). The median survival time was 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.7 months to 14.9 months). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. The incidences of grade 3 or 4 toxicity were 72.1% for neutropenia, 52.5% for leukopenia, 23.0% for anemia, and 14.8% for thrombocytopenia. As noticeable toxic events, grade 3 hypotention and alkaline phosphatase elevation were transiently observed in one patient each. In addition, three patients who had had asymptomatic interstitial pneumonitis, identified by diagnostic imaging before treatment, aggravated after amrubicin treatment; two of them died. Other non-hematologic toxicities were relatively mild.

CONCLUSION

Amrubicin was an active, well-tolerated agent in the treatment of NSCLC.

Phase I/II study of amrubicin, a novel 9-aminoanthracycline, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Amrubicin is a novel, totally synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline. The present phase I/II study was performed to define its maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy and toxicity in the treatment of previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemonaive patients were required to have cytologically or histologically proven measurable NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2, and adequate organ functions. Amrubicin was administered by daily intravenous injection for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

In a phase I study, four patients were enrolled at dose level 1 (40 mg/m(2)/day) and four at dose level 2 (45 mg/m(2)/day). No dose limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as toxicity consisting of grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia lasting four days or more, and grade 3 or 4 toxicity other than neutropenia, leukopenia, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, and alopecia, was observed at these dose levels. Subsequently, at dose level 3 (50 mg/m(2)/day), 3 of 5 patients experienced DLTs (leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or gastrointestinal complications). The MTD and recommended dose (RD) were determined to be 50 mg/m(2)/day and 45 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. Three partial responses (PRs) were achieved in 13 patients (response rate, 23.1%) in a phase I study. In a phase II study, 15 patients were assessable for efficacy and toxicity at the RD, and four PRs were obtained (response rate, 26.7%). The major toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia, while non-hematologic toxicities were mild. The overall response rate in the combined patient population of the phase I/II study was 25.0% (7 PRs in 28 patients), with a 95% confidence interval of 10.7% to 44.9%.

CONCLUSION

Amrubicin exerted promising antitumor activity on NSCLC with acceptable toxicity.

Survival outcome of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving conventional dose epirubicin and Paclitaxel as first-line treatment

OBJECTIVE

High-dose epirubicin was shown to be effective in the treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Paclitaxel is synergistic to a conventional dose of anthracyclines in the treatment of advanced cancer. A phase II study was designed to test the effectiveness of combining paclitaxel with a conventional dose of epirubicin in inoperable NSCLC patients.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included inoperable stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, measurable or evaluable disease and adequate organ function. Epirubicin 70 mg/m2 intravenous infusion for 15 min was given on day 1. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenous infusion for 3 h was given on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Tumor response was evaluated every two cycles. Patients received treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or stable disease after cycle 6.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients received a total of 185 cycles (median 6 cycles). Seventeen patients responded to treatment (response rate 44.7%). Twenty-six (68%) patients received second-line chemotherapy. All patients were followed until their death. Median survival was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval 9.0-14.9 months). Median time-to-treatment-failure was 4.6 months.

CONCLUSION

Conventional dose epirubicin plus paclitaxel is effective as a first-line treatment for inoperable NSCLC patients.

Phase II study of sequential treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: three cycles of high-dose epirubicin plus cisplatin followed by weekly vinorelbine

Previous phase I, II, and III studies on high-dose epirubicin (HDEPI), alone or in combination with cisplatin (CP), indicate an interesting activity of this drug in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the toxicological profile of HDEPI limits its prolonged use. In our experience, vinorelbine (VNR) seems to be a suitable drug for long-term monotherapy for advanced NSCLC. On these grounds, advanced NSCLC patients were treated with the following strategy: 3 consecutive cycles of CP 60 mg/m2 and HDEPI 120 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks; then, irrespective of response, weekly VNR at a dose of 25 mg/m2 was administered at home. From December 1996 to March 1998, 25 patients entered the study. After receiving 3 cycles of CP/HDEPI, 8 patients (32%) had a partial response and 3 (12%) had a minor response. Nine patients had stable disease (36%) and 4 (16%) had progressive disease. Twenty-three patients received weekly VNR, and the median number of administrations was 10 (range, 1-38). After VNR treatment, we observed a partial response in 2 patients who previously had stable disease. Therefore, the overall response rate to sequential treatment was 40%; median time to progression was 7 months (range, 2-26 months). The major toxicities due to the CP/HDEPI regimen were neutropenia (72%) and alopecia (80%). During the VNR treatment, grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 36% of patients. The doses and the timing of VNR administrations were modified according to toxicity. Symptoms such as cough, dyspnea, and pain, present in 21 patients before the treatment, improved in 11 cases (52%). Median overall survival is 9 months (range, 3-40+ months); one patient is still alive after 40 months. One- and 2-year survival rates are, respectively, 44% and 16%. This study confirms the activity of CP/HDEPI in NSCLC and indicates that the sequential treatment of CP/HDEPI for 3 cycles followed by weekly VNR could be considered an effective strategy for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

First-line gemcitabine with cisplatin or epirubicin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial

The purpose of our study was to compare progression-free survival and quality of life (QOL) after cisplatin–gemcitabine (CG) or epirubicin–gemcitabine (EG) in chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients (n=240) were randomised to receive gemcitabine 1125 mg m⁻² (days 1 and 8) plus either cisplatin 80 mg m⁻² (day 2) or epirubicin 100 mg m⁻² (day 1) every 3 weeks for a maximum of five cycles. Eligible patients had normal organ functions and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ⩽2. QOL was measured with European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and LC13 questionnaires. There were no significant differences in median progression-free survival (CG 26 weeks, EG 23 weeks), median overall survival (CG 43 weeks, EG 36 weeks), or tumour response rates (CG 46%, EG 36%). Toxicity was mainly haematologic. In the EG arm granulocytopenia occurred more frequently, leading to more febrile neutropenia. Also, elevation of serum transaminases, mucositis, fever, and decline in LVEF were more common in the EG arm. In the CG arm, more patients experienced elevated serum creatinine levels, sensory neuropathy, nausea, and vomiting. Global QOL was not different in both arms. Progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, and QOL were not different between both arms; however, overall toxicity was more severe in the EG arm.

[Profile of the anti-tumor effects of amrubicin, a completely synthetic anthracycline]

Amrubicin is a completely synthetic anthracycline derivative. In contrast, however, the anthracyclines used clinically thus far have been produced by fermentation or semisynthesis. Amrubicin is structurally distinguishable from other anthracyclines by the amino group at the 9-position and its unique sugar moiety. Amrubicinol, the C-13 hydroxy- metabolite of amrubicin, is associated with a 5 to 200 times greater cytotoxicity than amrubicin. Amrubicin exhibited superior in vivo antitumor activity to doxorubicin in the human tumor xenograft model. Using this model, the level of amrubicinol (active metabolite) was shown to be higher than that of doxorubicin in tumor tissues, but lower in normal tissues. These results suggest potent therapeutic activity for amrubicin because of the selective distribution of its highly active metabolite, amrubicinol, in tumors. These anti-tumor effects of amrubicin are considered to be induced by DNA topoisomeraseII inhibition. In clinical studies, amrubicin has demonstrated potent single agent activity as compared to a standard regimen in untreated patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Its major toxicity was myelosuppression (especially neutropenia).

Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support in patients with relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer: feasibility and efficacy

The purpose of this study is to determine whether it is feasible to administer high-dose epirubicin (135 mg m(-2)) combined with a fixed dose of cisplatin every 2 weeks with G-CSF support in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Subsequently, the efficacy of the recommended dose of this regimen was tested in a phase II study in patients with relapsed NSCLC. In the initial feasibility study at least 6 patients were entered at each of the 4 dose levels tested. A fixed dose of cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) was given. Epirubicin was administered at 120 mg m(-2) on dose level 1, 135 mg m(-2) on dose level 2 and 3 and 135 mg m(-2) on dose level 4. Patients treated at dose level 3 and 4 received G-CSF support on days 3-12. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks on the first 3 dose levels and every 2 weeks on the fourth dose level. A total of 27 patients were then treated on dose level 4, which appeared to be feasible in the initial study. In the initial study, a total of 86 courses were administered. Haematological toxicity was the principal side effect. None of the patients encountered dose-limiting toxicity in the first course, which confirmed that epirubicin 135 mg m(-2) could be combined with cisplatin 60 mg m(-2) and accelerated by G-CSF support to a 14-day-schedule. In the subsequent phase II study with this schedule, 89 courses were administered. The relative dose intensity of cisplatin and epirubicin was 0.90 and 0.91, respectively. Myelosuppression was frequent with 70% and 63% of patients experiencing WHO grade III or IV leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. 6 cases of febrile neutropenia were observed, with 2 treatment-related deaths. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting, which was grade III in 22% of patients. Renal toxicity grade I and II occurred in 37% and 4% of patients, respectively. 55% of these patients had received prior cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. On an intention-to-treat basis 9 partial responses were recorded in 27 patients (33%; 95% confidence interval, 15%-51%). Accelerated cisplatin and high-dose epirubicin with G-CSF support is a feasible and promising regimen in relapsed NSCLC. Myelosuppression limits the use of this regimen in the second-line setting to a selected group of patients with a good performance status. Since the activity of this regimen is encouraging, it is probably best studied in untreated patients.

Front-line treatment of advanced breast cancer with docetaxel and epirubicin: a multicenter phase II study

PURPOSE

In a previous phase I trial we evaluated the toxicity and determined the maximum tolerated doses of the docetaxel (D)-epirubicin (Epi) combination. We conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of this regimen as front-line treatment in women with advanced breast cancer (ABC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-four women with ABC stage IIIB (4 patients) or IV (50 patients) received front-line treatment with Epi 70 mg/m2 on day 1 and D 90 mg/m2 on day 2. The median age was 55 years, performance status (WHO) was 0-1 in 49 patients and visceral disease was present in 45 (83%).

RESULTS

All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 50 for response. In an intent-to-treat analysis complete remission was observed in 5(9%) patients, partial remission in 31 (57%) (overall response rate 66%, 95% confidence interval: 54% 79%), stable disease in 9 (17%) and disease progression in 9 (17%). After a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the median duration of responses was 8 months, the median time to disease progression 11.5 months and the median survival has not yet been reached. The probability of one-year survival was 65%. Three hundred six cycles of treatment were administered (median 6 cycles per patient). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 8 (15%) and 31 (57%) patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia in 19 (35%). Prophylactic rh-G-CSF was used in 45 (83%) patients or 226 (74%) cycles. Other hematologic or non-hematologic toxicities were usually mild. In five (9%) patients the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was decreased by more than 10% with the treatment. Two patients died during the treatment of respiratory failure without associated neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel epirubicin is an effective and well tolerated front-line treatment in patients with ABC.

Phase II study of paclitaxel and epirubicin as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of paclitaxel and epirubicin has shown a favorable interaction in patients with advanced breast carcinoma. Therefore the efficacy and toxicity of this regimen was evaluated in a Phase II study of patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

Thirty-two chemotherapy-naive patients with AJCC Stage IV NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were entered into the study. Patients received epirubicin, 90 mg/m(2), followed by paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2) by 3-hour infusion, on Day 1. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used routinely.

RESULTS

A total of 116 treatment cycles was delivered. All patients could be assessed for response, toxicity, and survival. There were 16 partial responses and no complete responses, giving rise to an overall response rate of 50% (95% confidence interval, 31. 9-68.1%). The median time to progression in responders was 7 months. The median survival was 8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 37%. World Health Organization Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 69% of patients, but could be managed easily with G-CSF, which was used in 35% of cycles. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy was the main nonhematologic toxicity and was observed in 7 of 8 patients who received 6 treatment courses (Grade 2-3 in 3 cases) and in 6 of 11 patients who received 4 cycles (Grade 2 in 2 patients). One patient died shortly after the first course of chemotherapy from a ventricular arrhythmia.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of paclitaxel and epirubicin was found to be effective and well tolerated in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic NSCLC and warrants further evaluation in a multicenter trial of a larger number of patients. Careful cardiac evaluation before treatment is indicated.

Phase I-II study of high dose epirubicin plus cisplatin in unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: searching for the maximal tolerated dose

The purpose of this study was to search for the maximal tolerated dose of cisplatin in the cisplatin plus high-dose epirubicin combination for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The following range of cisplatin dosages were tested in a phase I study: 75, 90, 105, and 120 mg/m2 in combination with epirubicin 120 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Eligibility consisted of previously untreated stage IIIb or IV non-small-cell lung cancers, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status less than or equal to 2, age less than or equal to 70 years, measurable disease, adequate blood counts, chemistry, cardiac function, and no brain metastasis. The maximal tolerated dose was defined as the dose level of cisplatin for which two of three patients or three of six patients developed one or more limiting toxicities during the first course of therapy. Afterward, the maximal tolerated dose of cisplatin was adopted in a subsequent phase II study. Three centers enrolled 42 patients: 18 in phase I and 24 in phase II. The maximal tolerated dose was almost reached at the last dose level (i.e., 120 mg/m2). Taking into account the total duration of the treatment, the real dose intensity for patients treated at the fourth dose level (120 mg/m2) did not differ from that of the third dose level (105 mg/m2). The latter dosage was therefore considered as the maximal tolerated one. In the subsequent phase II study, the median number of cycles received per patient was three (range: one to eight). Fifty percent required a dose reduction of either epirubicin, cisplatin, or both. The main toxicity was neutropenia, resulting in 10 episodes of febrile grade IV neutropenia requiring readmission. Other toxicities were mild to moderate. There was no toxic-related death. On intent-to-treat analysis, 10 patients (33%) achieved an objective response. Among them were three complete responders. Median survival was 8 months. We observed neither detraction nor improvement of quality of life as assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30-LC13. Given every 3 weeks in combination with epirubicin 120 mg/m2, the maximal tolerated cisplatin dose is 105 mg/m2. This combination yields activity in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Results of a dose-intense phase 1 study of a combination chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin and epidoxorubicin including medroxyprogesterone acetate and recombinant interleukin-2 in patients with inoperable primary lung cancer

Based on the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia and the ability of progestins, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate, to reduce cytokine production and relieve cancer-related anorexia-cachexia symptoms, the authors designed an open, dose-finding phase I study of a combined chemotherapy regimen (cisplatin [CDDP], epidoxorubicin [EPI]), including recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) and medroxyprogesterone acetate for patients with stage IIIB to IV inoperable primary lung cancer. The end points were clinical response and toxicity with definition of dose-limiting toxicity and maximal tolerable dose; relief of cancer-related anorexia-cachexia symptoms; the assessment of patient serum levels of IL-1beta, IL-6, tumor-necrosing factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R). From March to October 1997, 16 patients (M:F ratio, 14:2; mean age, 60.5 years; age range, 41 to 74 years) were enrolled. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 14 of them for response. The patients were assigned to increasing dose levels of drugs according to a dose-escalation schedule. The weekly schedule consisted of a combination of CDDP given intravenously on day 1, EPI given intravenously on day 1, 1 g/day medroxyprogesterone acetate given orally on days 1 to 7, and recombinant IL-2 1.8 MIU administered subcutaneously on days 2 to 7 plus 300 microg granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support given subcutaneously on days 2 to 5. Administration of medroxyprogesterone acetate began 1 week before the first cycle. Dose escalation of the drugs was as follows: 30 mg x m2 x week(-1) CDDP and 25 mg x m2 x week(-1) EPI (first level, two patients); 30 mg x m2 x week(-1) CDDP and 33 mg x m2 x week(-1) EPI (second level, 2 patients); 40 mg x m2 x week(-1) CDDP and 33 mg x m2 x week(-1) EPI (third level, 6 patients); and 40 mg x m2 x week(-1) CDDP and 40 mg x m2 x week(-1) EPI (fourth level, 6 patients). Six cycles were planned for each patient. The actual dose intensity delivered was more than 80% of the projected dose intensity of all drugs. After six cycles, clinical response (according to World Health Organization criteria), toxicity (according to World Health Organization criteria), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, body weight, appetite, and serum levels of cytokines were evaluated. After six cycles, 9 of 14 patients (64.3%) had partial response, 3 of 14 (21.4%) had stable disease, and 2 of 14 (14.3%) had progressive disease, and the objective response rate was 64.3%. ECOG performance status and body weight did not change significantly after treatment, whereas appetite showed an increase that was of borderline statistical significance. Toxicity was acceptable and only hematologic. Dose-limiting toxicity was established at the fourth dose level; consequently, maximal tolerable dose was assessed at the third dose level. Before treatment, the serum levels of IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha were significantly greater in the patients than in healthy persons. The comparison between pretreatment and posttreatment serum values of IL-1beta, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and sIL-2R did not reveal significant differences in the patients. Similar results were obtained when the patients were considered as responders (partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease) to therapy. Only IL-6 serum levels were increased (p = 0.014) after treatment.

Activity of high-dose epirubicin combined with gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase I and II study

The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of epirubicin and gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase I study was performed with the combination of escalating doses of epirubicin intravenously on day 1 and a fixed dose of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 of a 21 -day cycle. Eighteen patients were included in the phase I part of the study before the maximum tolerated dose was found. Dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia. The phase II part of the study was continued with epirubicin 100 mg m(-2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1125 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Forty-three chemotherapy-naive patients were included. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range 26-75). Most patients (74%) were in stage IV. Granulocytopenia CTC grade 4 occurred in 32.5% and thrombocytopenia grade 4 in 11.6% of cycles. Febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients. Non-haematological toxicity was mainly mucositis CTC grade 2 and 3 in 35% of patients. The tumour response rate was 49% (95% confidence interval (CI) 35-63%). The median survival time for the patients was 42 weeks (95% CI 13-69).

Anthracyclines in non-small-cell lung cancer: do they have a therapeutic role?

BACKGROUND

Owing to its low level of activity together with its potential cardiotoxicity, doxorubicin (DXR) has been considered as having a marginal role in the treatment of NSCLC. Its analogue, epirubicin (EPI), has also shown a poor antitumor activity in the treatment of NSCLC when used at 'standard' doses (= 90 mg/m2). On the contrary, high-dose epirubicin (HD-EPI) (> 90 mg/m2) has demonstrated antitumor activity as a single agent in the treatment of advanced NSCLC in six small phase II studies (mean 25%, range 17%-36%).

RESULTS

A series of consecutive studies on the activity of HD-EPI alone or in combination regimens were carried out at the Division of Medical Oncology of S. Orsola-M. Malpighi Hospital. After activity was confirmed in advanced disease with doses between 120 and 165 mg/m2 (PR in 6 of 24 = 25%), a phase II study was carried out on the combination of HD-EPI 120 mg/m2 + cisplatinum (CP) 60 mg/m2 in stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. PR was achieved in 54% of 35 patients with a median survival of nine months. A subsequent multicenter phase III trial compared HD-EPI and vinorelbine (VNR), both combined with CP. Two hundred twenty-eight patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized to receive either EPI 120 mg/m2 plus CP 60 mg/m2 on day 1 or VNR 25 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 plus CP 60 mg/m2 on day 1. Both treatments were recycled every 21 days. Eligible patients were 212 and 210 patients evaluable for objective response (100 on HD-EPI and 110 on VNR), respectively. The CR + PR rate was 32% vs. 26% (P = NS) for a median duration of nine and eight months, respectively. Median survival was 10 and 9.5 months, respectively. Grade III-IV leucopenia occurred in 38% and 21% on HD-EPI and VNR, respectively (P = 0.01), thrombocytopenia in 6% and 0% (P = 0.02), anemia in 8% and 7% (NS). Non-hematological toxicity was moderate and the only difference between the treatments was alopecia (88% vs. 33% on HD-EPI and VNR, respectively). Supraventricular arrhythmia occurred in three patients on HD-EPI; a > 15% LVEF decrease by MUGA scan was observed in 22.5% and 14% patients on HD-EPI and VNR, respectively (NS). No congestive heart failure was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

EPI can be safely administered at a dose of 120-135 mg/m2 in non-pretreated patients showing a significant antitumor activity in NSCLC. If the cumulative dose of 800-900 mg/m2 is not exceeded, clinical manifestations of cardiotoxicity are very rare. However, grade 3-4 myelotoxicity and alopecia are very common and can limit the use of this drug in the palliative treatment of this disease. Interesting results are observed in an ongoing pilot study that employed HD-EPI + CP + VNR + G-CSF in the induction therapy of locally advanced NSCLC.

Dose-finding study of epidoxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Anthracyclines and taxanes are the most active drugs against breast cancer and the search after their optimal combination is under intensive investigation in both the advanced and early disease settings. A dose-finding study of epidoxorubicin (E) and docetaxel (D) was conducted in advanced breast cancer (ABC) to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support and to characterise its toxicity and activity profile.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients who received neither palliative chemotherapy nor adjuvant anthracyclines (55% with dominant visceral disease and 66% with > or = 2 sites involved) with measurable/evaluable lesions, were treated at four dose levels starting from E 75 mg/m2 and D 75 mg/m2 to E 120 mg/m2 and D 85 mg/m2. A maximum of four cycles of the combination was given every three weeks and four additional cycles of single agent D were allowed in responding patients. Cardiac function was monitored at baseline and at every second course by echocardiography.

RESULTS

Febrile neutropenia (two patients) and prolonged, severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 0.1 x 10(9)/l for more than three days; one patient) defined the MTD of the combination without G-CSF support at E 90 mg/m2 and D 75 mg/m2. G-CSF was then routinely administered from the subsequent dose level of E 120 mg/m2 and D 75 mg/m2. The MTD with G-CSF support was established at E 120 mg/m2 and D 85 mg/m2 (one patient with neutropenic fever together with failure of ANC recovery at day 21, three patients with ANC less than 0.1 x 10(9)/l for more than three days, one patient with both and one patient with grade 4 thrombocytopenia and toxic death from typhlitis while neutropenic). No severe neurotoxicity, mucositis, or fluid retention were observed and there were no clinical signs of cardiotoxicity. Antitumor activity was not a primary endpoint of the study: the overall response rate (ORR) in 40 evaluable patients was 60% (95% confidence interval: 43%-75%, 58% in liver disease, 84% in soft tissue) with no apparent dose-related effect. After a median follow-up of 19 months (range 2-30+), the overall time to progression (TTP) in nine patients without maintenance hormonal therapy was five months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of E and D proved to be an effective and safe regimen in poor- prognosis patients with ABC. G-CSF support allowed higher doses to be delivered safely but dose escalation did not translate into improved response rates (RR). The MTD without growth factors support was used, in a phase II trial, which also included patients with previous anthracycline-containing adjuvant regimens.

A phase II study with vinorelbine, gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with stage IIIb-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

In our phase II study an acceptable and effective agent like cisplatin was used in combination with vinorelbine and gemcitabine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These two new cytostatic drugs have demonstrated, when used as a single-agent treatment, effective response rates (vinorelbine) and minimum toxicity (gemcitabine). The following schedule was used: (i) vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; (ii) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; and (iii) cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 8. The schedule was repeated every 21 days, with a maximum of six cycles per patient. A total of 31 patients with a mean Karnofsky performance status of 90% were evaluated and 29 of them were finally eligible. Of the patients, five (16.1%) were at stage IIIb and the remainder (83.9%) were at stage IV. The overall response rate was 65% (20 patients); six patients (19.4%) had complete response (CR) and 14 (45.2%) had partial response (PR). Two patients (6.5%) had stable disease and seven (22.6%) had progressive disease. The most notable toxicity was hematologic. Leukoneutropenia was mainly revealed after the third or fourth cycle and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered in 24 patients (77.4%). Mild anemia was found in almost all patients after the third or fourth cycle (Hb 10-11 g/dl) and eight patients (25.8%) required erythropoietin (EPO). Thrombocytopenia was more often observed compared with other known chemotherapeutic regimens; six patients (19.4%) had grade I thrombocytopenia and therapy was delayed in another four patients (12.9%) due to this complication. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and well tolerated and consisted of alopecia (54.8%), nausea and vomiting (12.9%), constipation (12.9%), peripheral neuropathy (9.6%), diarrhea (6.5%), stomatitis (3.2%) and local phlebitis (3.2%). The examined combination provides us with one of the best overall responses rates reported, however at the cost of remarkable hematologic toxicity. Therefore, it would be better applied in patients with good performance status. The high response rates give us hope of using this combination as a neoadjuvant regimen.

Multicenter randomized clinical trial on high-dose epirubicin plus cis-platinum versus vinorelbine plus cis-platinum in advanced non small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

High dose Epirubicin (HD-EPI) (>90 mg/m2) and Vinorelbine (VNR) demonstrated antitumor activity as single agent (about 20%) in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. This trial compares these two agents combined with cisplatin (CP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From August 1992 to February 1996, 228 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomized to receive either EPI 120 mg/m2 as i.v. bolus plus Cisplatin (CP) 60 mg/m2 on day 1 (regimen A) or VNR 25 mg/m2 as i.v. bolus on day 1 and 8 plus CP 60 mg/m2 on day 1 (regimen B). Both treatments were recycled every 21 days up to a maximum cumulative dose of EPI of 840 mg/m2 or 12 cycles. Eligible patients were 212 and 198 patients were evaluable for objective response (95 in arm A and 103 in arm B). The main characteristics of eligible patients were: male/female 179/33; median age 61 (42-72); median Karnofsky PS 80 (70-100); stage IIIA 12%, stage IIIB 40%, stage IV 41%, recurrence 7%; histotype: epidermoid 48%, adenoca 36%, others 16%.

RESULTS

The following response rates were observed in regimens A and B, respectively; CR, 1 and 2%, PR, 32 and 25% (P = 0.4567). Median CR + PR duration was 9 and 8 months, respectively. Median survival was 10.5 and 9.6 months, respectively. Grade III-IV leucopenia occurred in 38 and 21% in arm A and arm B, respectively(P = 0.01), thrombocytopenia in 6 and 0% (P = 0.02), anemia in 8 and 7% (n.s.). Non-hematological toxicity was moderate and the only difference between the treatments was alopecia (88 vs. 33% in arm A and B, respectively). Supraventricular arrhythmia occurred in three patients on regimen A; a >15% LVEF absolute decrease was observed in 9 (22.5%) and three (14%) patients on arm A and arm B, respectively (n.s.). No congestive heart failure was observed.

CONCLUSION

HD-EPI+CP and VNR+CP are both active combinations in advanced NSCLC with a similar response rate, response duration and survival but regimen A was significantly more toxic (myelosuppression and alopecia).

Phase I dose intensification study of 2-weekly epirubicin with GM-CSF in advanced cancer

This study investigated dose intensification of epirubicin administered as a 2-weekly regimen with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support. The aim was to define the maximally tolerated dose of epirubicin and to assess the efficacy of GM-CSF to ameliorate its toxicity. Patients with anthracycline-responsive advanced malignancies were eligible. Six dose levels, commencing at 90 mg/m2, of epirubicin administered every 2 weeks for four courses were planned with GM-CSF 10 micrograms/kg/day administered for 10 days from the second day of each course. Six patients were to be entered at each dose level, and escalation to the next level was based upon toxicity criteria. Twelve patients were entered, six at dose level 1 (90 mg/m2) and six at dose level 2 (120 mg/m2). Prospectively defined haematological dose-limiting toxicities were noted in one patient at dose level 1 and in five patients at dose level 2. Further dose escalation was not attempted. Significant nonhaematological toxicities included febrile neutropenia in two and four patients at dose levels 1 and 2, respectively. This study has demonstrated that epirubicin can be safely administered at 2 week intervals with GM-CSF at a dose of 90 mg/m2, equivalent to the previously reported maximum tolerated dose intensity of 45 mg/m2/week. Neutropenia was dose-limiting despite the use of GM-CSF.

Cisplatin and vinorelbine followed by ifosfamide plus epirubicin vs the opposite sequence in advanced unresectable stage III and metastatic stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (GOIM)

A multicentric, prospective phase III study was carried out with the aim of testing the so-called 'worst drug rule' hypothesis, which suggests the use of an effective but 'less active' regimen that first eradicates tumoral cells resistant to a second effective and 'more active' regimen. With respect to this hypothesis, we considered the cisplatin plus vinorelbine regimen (CCDP/VNR) as the more active regimen compared with the non-cisplatin-containing regimen of ifosfamide plus high-dose epirubicin (IFO/EPI). Thus, a randomized study was carried out to compare the sequencial strategy of three cycles of CDDP/VNR followed by three cycles of IFO/EPI with the opposite sequence in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A total of 100 consecutive previously untreated patients with stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer were centrally randomized in two arms according to stage of disease and the performance status. Patients allocated to arm A received CDDP (100 mg m-2 on day 1) plus VNR (25 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1 and 8) every 21 days for three cycles (step 1) followed, after restaging, by three cycles of IFO (2.5 g m-2 with mesna on day 1) plus high-dose EPI (100 mg m-2 on day 1) every 21 days (step 2). Patients in arm B received the opposite sequence. Type and rates of objective response were evaluated after step 1 and step 2 in agreement with WHO criteria and an intent-to-treat analysis. Patients were also analysed for toxicity patterns, time to progression and survival. After the first three cycles (step 1), overall response rate (ORR), calculated according to an intent-to-treat analysis, was 47% and 21% for arm A and arm B respectively (P = 0.0112). ORR for stage III patients was 55% and 14% for arm A and B respectively (P = 0.0097). In stage IV patients ORR was higher in arm A than in arm B (42% vs 28%) but not statistically significant (P = 0.4). Clinical responses to the shift of chemotherapy (step 2) showed that no patient pretreated with CDDP/VNR and subsequently treated with IFO/EPI showed further response, whereas in the inverse sequence arm CDDP/VNR was able to induce 26% partial response (PR) rate in patients pretreated with IFO/EPI. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.037). The overall median time to progression (TTP) of arm A and arm B did not significantly differ (6 vs 4 months; P = 0.665). However, median TTP of stage III patients was, respectively, 7 months for arm A and only 3 months for arm B. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.049). Median overall survival (OS) was 9 and 7 months respectively for arm A and arm B. Despite this trend the difference was not significant (P = 0.328). Median OS of stage III patients showed a statistically significant advantage for arm A over arm B (13 vs 7 months, P = 0.03). In addition, no statistically significant difference in OS was recorded for stage IV patients (both arms 7 months, P = 0.526). Our data do not confirm Day's 'worst drug rule' hypothesis, at least in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with the above-mentioned regimens. The combination of CDDP and VNR seems more active, at least in terms of response rate, than the IFO/EPI, which performed poorly.

Phase I study of high-dose epirubicin and vinorelbine in previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer stage IIIB-IV

The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of high-dose epirubicin and vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Twenty-one patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC were treated in a single-centre study with escalating doses of epirubicin and vinorelbine given on an outpatient basis. The first dose level comprised epirubicin 100 mg m-2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 20 mg m-2 (days 1 and 8) given intravenously every 3 weeks. Escalating doses for epirubicin and vinorelbine were respectively 120 (day 1) and 20 (days 1 and 8), 120 (day 1) and 25 (days 1 and 8) and 135 (day 1) and 25 (days 1 and 8) mg m-2. Inclusion criteria were age < or = 75 years, ECOG performance score < or = 2 and normal renal, hepatic and bone marrow functions. Dose-limiting toxicities were thrombocytopenia grade II and neutropenia grade III on day 8, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia lasting > 7 days. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at the first dose level; at the 135/25 mg m-2 dose level three out of six patients had a DLT which was considered as unacceptable. The only non-haematological toxicity reaching grade III was nausea/vomiting. One patient showed cardiac toxicity. No neurotoxicity and no treatment-related deaths were seen. The maximum tolerated dose of epirubicin and vinorelbine is 135 mg m-2 (day 1) and 25 mg m-2 (days 1 and 8) respectively, causing mainly haematological toxicity. The recommended dose of epirubicin and vinorelbine for phase II studies is found to be 120 mg m-2 and 20 mg m-2 respectively.

New chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an update including data from the Seventh World Conference on Lung Cancer

Over the past two decades, modest gains have been made in chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with the addition of cisplatin-based regimens to the therapeutic armamentarium. Over the last decade, several new agents with significant activity have reached the level of Phase II and III testing. This list of new drugs includes: navelbine, the taxanes--taxol and taxotere, gemcitabine, edatrexate and the camptothecins--irinotecan and topotecan. During this period, oral etoposide and epirubicin were re-investigated and biological agents such as the retinoids, interferons and interleukins were also explored as alternatives to traditional chemotherapy. As these new drug investigations proceeded, basic scientists made important discoveries which are now beginning to be applied to therapy. The future promises to combine these active new drugs with therapies directed against targets unique to non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Chemotherapy of stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer

Currently, lung cancer is a leading cause of death in men with more than half million new cases diagnosed every year. Eighty percent of these tumors are non-small-cell carcinoma and 70% of these are unresectable or metastatic at the time of presentation, resulting in dramatically poor survival rates. The increasing number of drugs showing a significant activity against non-small-cell lung cancer and the widespread use of modern cisplatin based regimens offer some hope of progress and suggest that chemotherapy may have a role in treating this disease. A recent meta-analysis has confirmed the modest but significant survival benefit for patients treated with combined chemotherapy both in case of metastatic disease and in addition to radiotherapy, in locally advanced disease.

Complications associated with the treatment of small cell lung cancer

Major modalities of treatment in small cell lung cancer include chemotherapy, radiation therapy and surgery and all of these cause both early and late toxicities. Common toxicities, both early and late, are described in all of the modalities of treatment. Emphasis on new approaches such as the use of colony-stimulating factors to reduce myelosuppression, new antiemetics to make cisplatin and anthracyclines much more tolerable, the use of cardiotoxic anthracyclines such as Epirubicin and emphasis on the incidence of second malignancies in this population, some of which will likely decrease due to decreased use of procarbazine and nitrosoureas along with fewer courses of chemotherapy.

Phase II trial of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in advanced breast cancer

Between February 1990 and December 1991 high-dose epirubicin (Epi)(120 mg/m2) plus cyclophosphamide (CTX)(600 mg/m2) were given every 3 weeks to 52 patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer. 26 patients with locally advanced disease received four courses of this regimen before and after local treatments. 26 patients had metastatic disease: they received eight courses unless progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Responses were seen in 37/48 (77%) evaluable patients including 14 complete responses (CR), 23 partial responses (PR), nine stable disease, two progressive disease. Among the 25 evaluable patients with locally advanced disease, 9 had a CR and 11 a > 80% decrease in tumour volume. 6 patients (24%) had a pathologically confirmed complete response. 18 patients (72%) had a tumour reduction to 0-2 cm. The 3-year disease-free survival was 60%. Of the 23 evaluable patients with metastatic disease, 5 obtained a CR and 10 a PR, yielding an overall response rate of 65%. Myelosuppression was substantial with a grade 3-4 leucopenia in 76% of the patients even if neutropenic fever occurred in only 7% of the courses. A clinical congestive heart failure occurred in 1 patient following a total Epi dose of 960 mg/m2 and a bilateral quadrantectomy and radiotherapy. We conclude that (1) high-dose Epi + CTX is a very active regimen, in particular for the patients with locally advanced breast cancer; (2) breast conservation after this regimen in some of these patients may be considered; (3) neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity. Currently, a phase II study using the same combination given every 2 weeks together with r-methuG-CSF is ongoing.

Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy

Epirubicin is the 4' epimer of the anthracycline antibiotic doxorubicin, and has been used alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents in the treatment of a variety of malignancies. Comparative and noncomparative clinical trials have demonstrated that regimens containing conventional doses of epirubicin achieved equivalent objective response rates and overall median survival as similar doxorubicin-containing regimens in the treatment of advanced and early breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer and nonresectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, dose-intensive regimens of epirubicin have achieved high response rates in a number of malignancies including early and advanced breast cancer and lung cancer. The major acute dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines is myelosuppression. In vitro and clinical studies have shown that, at equimolar doses, epirubicin is less myelotoxic than doxorubicin. The lower haematological toxicity of epirubicin, as well as the recent introduction of supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, has allowed dose-intensification of epirubicin-containing regimens, which is particularly significant because of the definite dose-response relationship of anthracyclines. Cardiotoxicity, which is manifested clinically as irreversible congestive heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy, is the most important chronic cumulative dose-limiting toxicity of anthracyclines. Epirubicin has a lower propensity to produce cardiotoxic effects than doxorubicin, and its recommended maximum cumulative dose is almost double that of doxorubicin, thus allowing for more treatment cycles and/or higher doses of epirubicin. In summary, dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens, which are feasible due to its lower myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity, have produced high response rates in early breast cancer, a potentially curable malignancy, as well as advanced breast, and lung cancers. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that improved response rates can improve quality of life in some clinical settings, but whether this leads to prolonged survival has not yet been determined. Recently implemented supportive measures such as colony-stimulating factors, prophylactic antimicrobials and peripheral blood stem cell support may help achieve other potential advantages of dose-intensive epirubicin-containing regimens such as reductions in morbidity and length of hospital admissions.

Phase I study of epirubicin plus vinorelbine with or without G-CSF in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The present phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of epirubicin, administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and combined with a conventional dose of vinorelbine [25 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8] with or without the support of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). 18 patients entered the study. The patients received the following four dose levels of epirubicin (i.v., day 1): 50 mg/m2 (3 patients) and 60 mg/m2 (6 patients) without G-CSF, 75 mg/m2 (3 patients) and 90 mg/m2 (6 patients) with G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg days 4-6 and 9-15). In the patients treated without G-CSF the MTD of epirubicin was 60 mg/m2 and leukopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. In the patients treated with G-CSF the MTD was 90 mg/m2, myelotoxicity being the dose-limiting toxicity. We observed 1/3 partial response (PR) with epirubicin at the dose of 75 mg/m2 and 2/6 PR at 90 mg/m2. These results would indicate the usefulness of a phase II study with epirubicin at the dose of 90 mg/m2 in association with conventional dose of vinorelbine with the support of G-CSF in advanced NSCLC.

A phase II study of high-dose epirubicin plus cisplatinum in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Thirty-seven patients with unresectable NSCLC received epirubicin (EPI) as i.v. bolus at the dose of 120 mg/sm+cisplatinum (CP) at the dose of 60 mg/sm every 28 days up to the maximum cumulative dose of 840 mg/sm of EPI. Of 35 evaluable patients, 19 (54%) (95% confidence limits: 37%-71%) achieved PR for a median duration of 10 months (range: 2-21). The majority of responsive patients experienced improvement in performance status, related-disease symptoms and body weight. Grades 3-4 leukopenia occurred in 42% of the patients. In five patients there was a > 10% reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction as calculated by radionuclide angiocardiography. None of these patients suffered from cardiac symptoms. The median survival was 9 months (range 2-26). This study shows that inclusion of HD-EPI in a combination regimen contributes to obtaining a high remission rate in advanced NSCLC.