Effective initial therapy of advanced breast cancer with fluorouracil and high-dose, continuous infusion calcium leucovorin

Pharmacologic modulation of 5-fluorouracil by folinic acid and pyridoxine for treatment of patients with advanced breast carcinoma

High concentration pyridoxal 5’-phosphate, the cofactor of vitamin B6, potentiates cytotoxicity in cancer cells exposed to 5-fluorouracil (FUra) and folinic acid (FA). We studied the effect of high-dose pyridoxine on antitumor activity of regimens comprising FUra and FA in 27 advanced breast carcinoma patients. Of 18 previously untreated patients, 12 had tumors that did not overexpress HER2 (Group I), and 6 that overexpressed HER2 (Group II). Nine patients (Group III) had prior chemotherapy. Group I received AVCF (doxorubicin, vinorelbine, cyclophosphamide, FUra, FA) or FAC (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, FUra, FA) followed by TCbF (paclitaxel carboplatin, FUra, FA). Groups II, and III received TCbF. Pyridoxine iv (1000–3000 mg/day) preceded each FA and FUra. Group II also received trastuzumab and pertuzumab. 26 patients responded. Three patients in Group I had CRs and 9 had PRs with 62–98% reduction rates; 4 patients in Group II had CRs and 2 had PRs with 98% reduction. Of 7 measurable patients in Group III, 2 attained CRs, and 5 had PRs with 81–94% reduction rates. Median time to response was 3.4 months. Unexpected toxicity did not occur. This pilot study suggests that high-dose vitamin B6 enhances antitumor potency of regimens comprising FUra and FA.

Phase II Trial of Oral Tegafur and Folinic Acid with Mitoxantrone as First-Line Regimen in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background

Tegafur acts as a deport form of 5-fluorouracil when administered orally for longs periods of time, since it is an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, with response rates of 29-44%. Biochemical modulation with folinic acid and the addition of mitoxantrone could increase the efficacy of tegafur in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

A prospective phase II trial in patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer was carried out. The scheme consisted of mitoxantrone, 12 mg/m2 intravenous day 1, oral tegafur, 750 mg/m2/day divided in three equal doses, and leucovorin 15 mg/8 h orally for days 1-21, given in a 4-week schedule. None patient had received chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer, although 16 patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Thirty-four patients were included. Objective responses were achieved in 20 of 32 patients assessable for response, with 1 complete response and 19 partial responses. The objective response rate was 62.5% (95% confidence intervals, 48-76%). The median duration of response was 10 months. Grade III-IV toxicity according to WHO criteria was digestive (nausea/vomiting) in 12.5%, diarrhea in 25% and stomatitis in 25% of patients. Other toxicities were low. Eight patients required dose-reduction.

Conclusions

We achieved a significant response rate with the scheme, which was administered on an outpatient basis. It seems to be safe and effective as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer, with a short median response duration. The size of the trial does not permit definitive conclusions, and the role of biochemical modulation of tegafur in combination with mitoxantrone remains to be defined.

Vincristine enhances amoeboid-like motility via GEF-H1/RhoA/ROCK/Myosin light chain signaling in MKN45 cells

Background

Anti-cancer drugs are widely used in cancer treatment frequently combined with surgical therapy and/or radiation therapy. Although surgery and radiation have been suggested to facilitate invasion and metastasis of tumor cells in some cases, there is so far little information about the effect of anti-cancer drugs on cellular invasive ability and metastasis. In this study, using four different anti-cancer drugs (vincristine, paclitaxel, cisplatin and etoposide), we examined whether these drugs influence the invasive ability of tumor cells.

Methods

Human gastric adenocarcinoma MKN45 cells were used to evaluate the effect of anti-cancer drugs. After drug treatment, cellular invasive ability was assessed using the Matrigel invasion chamber. Cytoskeletal changes after treatment were examined microscopically with F-actin staining. In addition, we monitored cellular motility in 3D matrigel environment by time-lapse microscopic analysis. The drug-induced activation of RhoA and ROCK was evaluated by pull-down assay and Western blotting using an antibody against phosphorylated myosin light chain (MLC), respectively. Where necessary, a ROCK inhibitor Y27632 and siRNA for guanine nucleotide exchange factor-H1 (GEF-H1) were applied.

Results

Among all drugs tested, only vincristine stimulated the invasive ability of MKN45 cells. Microscopic analysis revealed that vincristine induced the formation of non-apoptotic membrane blebs and amoeboid-like motility. Vincristine significantly enhanced RhoA activity and MLC phosphorylation, suggesting the involvement of RhoA/ROCK pathway in the vincristine-induced cytoskeletal reorganization and cellular invasion. Furthermore, we found that Y27632 as well as the siRNA for GEF-H1, a RhoA-specific activator, attenuated MLC phosphorylation, the formation of membrane blebs and the invasive ability after vincristine treatment.

Conclusions

These results indicate that vincristine activates GEF-H1/RhoA/ROCK/MLC signaling, thereby promoting amoeboid-like motility and the invasive ability of MKN45 cells.

Algorithms for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer and prior exposure to taxanes and anthracyclines

At present, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains an incurable disease, with the goals of care aimed at maximizing the patient's duration and quality of life. Treatment options for a patient with MBC have become more efficacious and numerous. In addition to endocrine and chemotherapy agents, a number of targeted agents, including trastuzumab and bevacizumab, are available. The option to use novel agents combined with a multitude of standard chemotherapies has further enhanced the landscape of therapeutic options. As such, specific regimens must be evaluated within the framework of the individual patient, answering such questions as whether to treat with sequential single agents or combination regimens as well as which agents to use and in what sequence. The concept of personalized care is even more apparent in the setting of MBC, where the goal of palliation is intrinsically more nuanced than that of curative intent. This review will broadly assess the evidence for current treatment options with attention to varying clinical scenarios. Ultimately, delivering quality of care necessitates balancing an understanding of evidence-based data with sensitive attention to quality-of-life goals.

Cell line-based platforms to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of candidate anticancer agents

Efforts to discover new cancer drugs and predict their clinical activity are limited by the fact that laboratory models to test drug efficacy do not faithfully recapitulate this complex disease. One important model system for evaluating candidate anticancer agents is human tumour-derived cell lines. Although cultured cancer cells can exhibit distinct properties compared with their naturally growing counterparts, recent technologies that facilitate the parallel analysis of large panels of such lines, together with genomic technologies that define their genetic constitution, have revitalized efforts to use cancer cell lines to assess the clinical utility of new investigational cancer drugs and to discover predictive biomarkers.

A phase I study of capecitabine and a modulatory dose of irinotecan in metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

There is a need for chemotherapy regimens active against anthracycline- and taxane-refractory breast cancer. Data from preclinical and pilot studies performed at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) suggested that when irinotecan (IRN) is given with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) efficacy is affected by the sequence of drug administration. Pretreatment with IRN 24 h before 5-FU increased the number of tumor cells in S-phase and the antitumor activity in a preclinical system. These data provided the rationale for the evaluation of IRN and capecitabine, a 5-FU prodrug, sequentially administered in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The main objective of the study was to determine the MTD and identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of capecitabine and IRN. Additionally, the degree of accumulation of cells in S-phase in tumor biopsies obtained at 24 h after the first dose of IRN was measured in consenting patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Metastatic breast cancer patients who experienced disease progression after at least one (taxane or anthracycline based) chemotherapy regimen and an expected survival of at least 3 months and ECOG performance status 0-2 were eligible. Twelve patients were enrolled and treated. The starting doses were IRN 80 mg/m(2) given over 90 min on days 1, 8, 22, 29, and capecitabine 1,500 mg/m(2)/day given days 2-15 and 23-36. Evaluation for response was performed after the first cycle. Sequential tumor biopsies were performed on five patients.

RESULTS

The first three patients treated exhibited modulation in cyclin A index on tumor biopsy as defined by the study, defining the modulatory dose of IRN as 80 mg/m(2). Overall, 4/5 biopsies showed modulation. Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) were assessed during the first cycle of therapy. Two DLTs (Grade 3 nausea vomiting and dehydration; grade 3 pneumonia, hypoxia, hypotension) were seen at dose level 2 of capecitabine (2,000 mg/m(2)/day) and the first cohort was expanded. There were no DLTs for patients treated at DL 1. No grade 3-4 toxicities occurred at DL 1. Seven patients were evaluable for response following one cycle of treatment (partial response 1, stable disease 4, progressive disease 2) Of the five inevaluable patients, two experienced DLT, one received 50% of the planned capecitabine dose, one progressed prior to evaluation, and one withdrew consent.

CONCLUSION

IRN 80 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 22, 29 in combination with capecitabine 1,500 mg/m(2)/day in divided dose days 2-15 and 23-36 has an acceptable toxicity profile and resulted in modulation of S-phase in 4/5 specimens examined. Further studies of the activity of this combination and modulatory effect of IRN are warranted.

Capecitabine monotherapy: safe and effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer

Optimal management for metastatic breast cancer frequently involves cytotoxic chemotherapy. Over the years, several complex multidrug regimens have been developed that were based upon a rationale of synergistic antitumor activity and nonoverlapping toxicities. However, recently the clinical value of these complex regimens has been called into question as several drugs used alone (monotherapy) or in sequence (serial single agent) have been shown to be both efficacious and better tolerated. Capecitabine (an orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate) is one such agent that has been proven to be effective when used alone for metastatic breast cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, and adjuvant colon cancer. In this review, published (or reported in abstract form) data examining various aspects of clinical response and tolerability with single-agent capecitabine for (primarily) first- and second-line metastatic breast cancer are examined. For the most part, response rates are comparable with those of the more complex regimens. Dose reductions from the labeled dose of 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily are relatively common. Toxicities (following dose reductions if needed) are generally manageable, even by more frail patients. Elderly patients are more likely to have impaired renal function or be receiving warfarin treatment, and special attention to these factors is warranted. Nonetheless, the drug administered alone is a reasonable choice when single-agent chemotherapy is entertained as a treatment option for metastatic breast cancer, including in the first-line setting.

A phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

This phase II multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin administered as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study enrolled 155 women with pathologically confirmed and measurable metastatic adenocarcinoma of the breast. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 425 mg/m2, and leucovorin 20 mg/m2 administered weekly 4 x per 4-week cycle in the first 40 patients enrolled (group 1), and weekly 3 x per 4-week cycle in the subsequent 115 patients (group 2) enrolled. Hematologic growth factor support was not routinely used. Twenty patients with hepatic dysfunction were enrolled to assess the tolerability of the regimen in this population. All therapies were delivered in an outpatient setting.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 48%, with 12-month estimated survival rates of 53% and 65% for treatment groups 1 and 2, respectively. Response rates were not statistically different between the two treatment schedules. Therapy was well tolerated when delivered on the every 3 of 4-week schedule, including patients with hepatic involvement and those age > or = 65.

CONCLUSION

Weekly therapy with paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin is active as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Use of this regimen should be given consideration, particularly in patients who are not candidates for anthracycline-based therapy.

Capecitabine in breast cancer: current status

Anthracyclines, together with taxanes, are at present the most active agents in metastatic breast cancer, while single-agent, bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is not very active in this setting. In view of encouraging results and tolerable toxicity of continuous infusion of 5-FU in gastrointestinal cancer, innovative oral 5-FU agents such as capecitabine have been developed. Capecitabine is a prodrug that is converted into the active compound 5-FU preferentially at the tumor site. An intermittent dosing schedule of capecitabine twice daily at a dose of 2510 mg/m2/day on days 1-14 in a 3-week cycle appeared to be feasible and resulted in a high dose intensity. A large phase II study investigating capecitabine in 135 advanced breast cancer patients, pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes, observed three complete and 24 partial responses (response rate, 20%), with a mean duration of 8.0 months. Preliminary results of a study comparing capecitabine with paclitaxel in 42 breast cancer patients failing anthracyclines indicate that the efficacy of capecitabine is comparable to that of paclitaxel, with response rates of 36% and 21%, respectively. Another study reported a response rate of 25% for capecitabine as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in women aged > or = 55 years, which tended to be better than combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-FU. In all studies, capecitabine side effects were mainly mild, and treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicity consisted of diarrhea (8%-11%), nausea (4%-11%), hand-foot syndrome (10%-18%), neutropenia (3%-20%), and bilirubin elevation (6%). Capecitabine is clearly an active agent for the treatment of breast cancer. It is currently registered in various countries for use in third-line treatment of metastatic disease. Its further role will have to be defined from data of randomized phase III studies.

Effective treatment of advanced breast cancer with vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin plus human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

A phase II trial was performed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of vinorelbine (VNB), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), l-leucovorin (LLV) and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in advanced breast cancer. Between August 1994 and October 1996, 53 patients entered this trial. Thirty-seven patients were previously untreated and 16 patients had failed previous palliative chemotherapy with (n = 12) or without anthracyclines (n = 4). Therapy consisted of VNB 40 mg m(-2) diluted in 250 ml of saline infused over 30 min on days 1 and 14 and LLV 100 mg m(-2) administered by intravenous bolus injection and 5-FU 400 mg m(-2) diluted in 500 ml of saline infused over 2 h, both given on days 1-5 every 4 weeks. G-CSF was administered at 5 microg kg(-1) day(-1) subcutaneously on days 6-10 during each cycle. Treatment was continued in cases of response or stable disease until a total of six courses were completed. The overall response rate was 59% for chemotherapeutically naive patients (95% confidence interval 42-75%), including five complete responses (CR; 13%) and 17 partial responses (PR; 46%); ten patients (27%) had stable disease (SD) and only five (14%) progressed (PD). Second-line chemotherapy with this regimen resulted in 3/16 (19%) objective remissions, but nine patients had SD and four had PD. The median time to progression was 10.5 months (range 2-23) in previously untreated patients and 7.0 months (range 2-19) in those who had failed prior chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 14 months, 29 patients (55%) are still alive with metastatic disease; median survival has not been reached yet. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression: WHO grade III and IV neutropenia occurred in 15 (28%) and four patients (8%), and was complicated by septicaemia in two; grade III anaemia and thrombocytopenia were noted in four (8%) and three (6%) patients respectively. Severe (WHO grade 3) non-haematological toxicities included stomatitis in 6% and nausea/vomiting and alopecia in 2% each. Our data suggest that the combination of vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin plus G-CSF is an effective first line regimen for treatment of advanced breast cancer. Overall toxicity was modest, with myelosuppression being the dose-limiting side-effect. Other severe adverse reactions were uncommon.

Weekly continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil with oral leucovorin in metastatic breast cancer patients with primary resistance to doxorubicin

Doxorubicin-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a very poor prognosis scenario, where only taxanes have shown activity, often at the expense of severe toxicity that compromises palliation. This study was undertaken to test the antitumor activity and tolerability of infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated with low-dose oral leucovorin (LV), in heavily pretreated patients with stringent criteria of primary resistance to doxorubicin, visceral involvement, and suboptimal performance status. Twenty-six patients with measurable MBC and primary resistance to anthracyclines received a weekly outpatient 48-hour infusion of high-dose 5-FU with low dose oral leucovorin. All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Eight partial responses were seen (30% response rate) in soft tissue and visceral sites, with a median response duration of eight months (5 + to 12). 98% of the cycles were minimally toxic or non-toxic. Toxicities included mucositis, diarrhea, and plantar-palmar-syndrome. Our results suggest that this schedule of LV-modulated infusional 5-FU can produce a substantial number of long-lasting responses and meaningful palliation to this very poor prognosis population.

Treatment of previously treated metastatic breast cancer by mitoxantrone and 48-hour continuous infusion of high-dose 5-FU and leucovorin (MFL): low palliative benefit and high treatment-related toxicity

For previously treated advanced breast cancer, there is no standard second-line therapy. Combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (MFL regimen) had been reported as an effective and well tolerated regimen. From October 1993 to November 1995, we treated 13 patients with previously chemotherapy-treated metastatic breast cancer by mitoxantrone, 12 mg/m2, on day 1 and continuous infusion of 5-FU, 3000 mg/m2, together with leucovorin, 300 mg/m2, for 48 h from day 1 to 2. Each course of chemotherapy was given every 4 weeks. Most of these patients had more than two metastatic sites, with lung metastasis predominant. Seven patients had been treated with anthracycline. Seven patients had previously received radiotherapy and seven had received hormone therapy. Median number of courses of MFL regimen given was six and the median cumulative dose of mitoxantrone was 68.35 mg/m2. One patient had complete response, seven had stable disease, none had partial response and five had progressive disease. The overall objective response rate was 7.6%. The median follow-up period was 14 months. Median survival was 16 months. Median progression-free survival was 5 months. A complete responder had relapse-free survival up to 17 months. Major toxicities were cardiotoxicity and leukopenia. Eight patients were dead in the last follow-up; two of them died of treatment-related toxicity. The MFL regimen achieves little palliative benefit and induces severe toxicity at a fairly high rate. Administration of this regimen to breast cancer patients who have been treated by chemotherapy and those with impaired heart function requires careful attention.

Phase II trial of an all-oral regimen of tegafur and folinic acid in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Tegafur is an antimetabolite slowly metabolized to 5-fluorouracil in vivo. Protracted administration of oral tegafur is active in metastatic breast cancer, with reported response rates ranging from 29 to 44%. The addition of folinic acid could improve the efficacy of tegafur by means of biochemical modulation.

METHODS

A prospective Phase II trial in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer was performed. The regimen consisted of oral tegafur (750 mg/m2/day) and oral folinic acid (45 mg/day) for 21 days, recycling at day 28.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included. Eight partial responses were observed for an objective response rate of 32% (95% confidence intervals for response, 23-41%). The median duration of response was 7 months. According to WHO criteria, 24% of patients experienced grade 3 mucositis and 12% grade 3 diarrhea, but no other significant toxicities were observed. Twenty-eight percent of patients required dose reductions for toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant response rate with oral tegafur and folinic acid in patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer was found. This all-oral regimen, which could be safely administered on an outpatient basis, deserves further evaluation to define the role of folinic acid on the activity of tegafur in metastatic breast cancer.

Folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil bolus and infusion and mitoxantrone with or without cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer

60 patients with metastatic breast cancer were entered in a phase II study using folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil bolus and infusion and mitoxantrone with or without cyclophosphamide. 47 had measurable visceral metastases and 13 had exclusively bone metastases. 36 had received previous adjuvant or metastatic treatment (33/36 with anthracycline-based regimens). Overall response rate in visceral metastatic patients was 57.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.4-78.8%]; 45.5% and 70% in previously and non-previously treated patients, respectively; duration of response was 9 and 13 months, respectively. 10 out 13 patients with exclusive bone metastases improved for a median time of 18 months. Median survival was 22 months for the 60 patients; 18 and 31 months for previously and non-previously treated patients, respectively. Cyclophosphamide was scheduled only in the absence of nadir grade 4 neutropenia. However, this toxicity occurred in the first 7 patients. For this reason, we chose to avoid cyclophosphamide in patients over 60 years, or with a performance status of 1-2, or who had received previous chemotherapy. Overall, cyclophosphamide was stopped due to nadir grade 4 neutropenia in 17/24 patients for whom this drug was planned. When mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid were used at the doses scheduled, the addition of cyclophosphamide appeared feasible in only about 25% of the patients. Furthermore, survival was identical for patients receiving or not receiving cyclophosphamide. Therefore, cyclophosphamide does not contribute substantially to this regimen. This study confirms the value of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and mitoxantrone in metastatic breast cancer.