Postoperative radiation therapy for high-risk colon carcinoma

Cone-beam computed tomography-guided online-adaptive radiotherapy for inoperable right colon cancer: First in human

We report the case of a medically inoperable patient with localised colon cancer. Due to symptomatic bleeding, definitive radiotherapy (5 daily fractions of 5 Gy) has been performed using cone-beam computed tomography-based online-adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Online-ART enables compensation of interfraction motion of abdominal organs by performing daily delineation of organs at risk (OARs) and target volumes. Daily treatment replanning maximised target volume coverage while lowering the dose to OARs. Intrafraction variation of the tumour was still significant and had to be incorporated in the planning target volume margin computation. After the treatment, the patient did not develop any acute radiotherapy-induced adverse events and had no further rectal bleeding either at the end of the radiotherapy or at oncological follow-up 4 months later. Online-ART for colon cancer is feasible and is a valuable alternative when surgery is not an option.

Presentation of Colorectal Carcinoma as Abdominal Wall Phlegmon

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy and the second most common deadly cancer worldwide as of 2020. Unusual presentation of this cancer with locally advanced disease is rare and seen in only 5% to 22% of cases. We present the case of a 53-year-old male who had invasive cecal adenocarcinoma with phlegmon of the abdominal wall musculature at presentation and an aggressive course that did not respond to the standard lines of therapy. In the current era of ongoing tremendous developments in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment, this uncommon case reminds us that locally advanced CRC is still a challenge to manage. Precision medicine with treatment strategies tailored to an individual's genetic, environmental and lifestyle factors is the current need.

Identifying the long-term survival beneficiary of chemotherapy for stage N1c sigmoid colon cancer

Sigmoid colon cancer often has an unsatisfactory prognosis. This study explored the effect of tumor deposits (TDs) on survival, and whether their presence/absence influence individualized treatment. Data of postoperative patients with sigmoid colon cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were identified using Cox regression analysis and random forest (RF). The nomogram's discrimination performance was evaluated using a concordance index (C-index), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), calibration curves, and decision-curve analysis. The N1c group showed a worse prognosis than the N0 group. For N1c patients, a combination of surgery and chemotherapy prolonged survival, compared to surgery alone; however, the chemotherapy-surgery combination did not affect the OS of patients younger than 70 years, in stage T1-2, and/or of black race. Multivariable analysis and RF presented Age, T stage, and N stage were the most important predictors for OS. The novel nomogram had superiority to the TNM staging system with improved C-index and IDI, as well as good consistency and higher clinical benefit. TDs are associated with poor survival from sigmoid colon cancer, and considering TDs can inform the formulation of individual treatment regimens. The nomogram shows satisfactory prediction ability for OS.

Postoperative locoregional recurrence pattern and treatment management of stage pT4 sigmoid colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the pattern of locoregional recurrence after surgery in patients with non-metastatic stage pT4 sigmoid colon cancer and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 208 patients who underwent surgery in our hospital. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation groups at a 1:1 ratio. Patients at high risk for locoregional recurrence were screened using Cox regression analysis. Based on the data of 2,886 patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Of the 208 patients, 57 (27.4%) presented with locoregional recurrences (14 anastomotic and 43 abdominal or pelvic lymph node recurrences). Multivariate analysis showed that serum CEA, differentiation, lymph node dissection number, and N stage were independent predictors of locoregional recurrence-free survival (all p < 0.05). A risk-stratification model was constructed, and a total score of ≥ 6.5 points was considered the high-risk group for locoregional recurrence. Both the training and validation sets presented that the model had a good predictive ability (area under the curve = 0.828 and 0.724, respectively). Analysis of SEER data revealed that adjuvant radiotherapy significantly prolonged OS and CSS in the high-risk population (all p < 0.05, vs. no radiotherapy).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a total risk score of 6.5 or more had a high likelihood of locoregional recurrence, and perhaps adjuvant radiotherapy could improve their survival.

Prognostic analysis and beneficiary identification of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy for stage pT4b sigmoid colon cancer

The clinical efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy in sigmoid colon cancer remains questioned. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with pathologic stage T4b sigmoid colon cancer. Patients with stage pT4b sigmoid colon cancer receiving adjuvant EBRT or not followed by surgery between 2004 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Analysis of overall survival (OS) was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and prognostic factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression models with 95% confidence intervals within the entire cohort. A risk-stratification system was then developed based on the β regression coefficient. Among 2073 patients, 284 (13.7%) underwent adjuvant EBRT. The median OS in the group receiving adjuvant EBRT was significantly longer than that in the non-radiotherapy group (p < 0.001). Age, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, perineural invasion, lymph node dissection (LND) number, and adjuvant EBRT were independent factors associated with OS. A risk-stratification system was generated, which showed that low-risk patients had a higher 5-year survival rate than high-risk patients (75.6% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.001). Adjuvant EBRT significantly prolonged the 5-year survival rate of high-risk patients (62.6% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.009) but showed no survival benefit among low-risk patients (87.7% vs. 73.2%, p = 0.100). Our risk-stratification model comprising age, serum CEA, perineural invasion, and LND number predicted the outcomes of patients with stage pT4b sigmoid colon cancer based on which subgroup of high-risk patients should receive adjuvant EBRT.

Assessing the Effect of Radiotherapy in Addition to Surgery in Colon Adenocarcinomas: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Evidence

PURPOSE

This study aims to review the contemporary evidence investigating radiotherapy (RT) in addition to surgery for colon adenocarcinomas.

METHODS

We searched the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, ASCOpubs, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies (since January 2005) comparing outcomes of high-risk colon adenocarcinomas who underwent RT in addition to surgery versus no RT were eligible. Pooling of outcomes from published results or from analysis of survival curves was done. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine if the efficacy of RT varies with RT timing.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included (five retrospective cohorts, three population-based studies). Pooled analysis from retrospective cohorts showed a reduction in 5-year LR (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.21-0.79; p = 0.007) in the RT group. A benefit in 3-year (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.15-2.87; p = 0.01) and 5-year (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.21-3.63; p = 0.008) DFS and in 3-year (OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.43-4.54; p = 0.001) and 5-year (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.17-3.41; p = 0.01) OS was seen in the RT group. The OS benefit was demonstrated in the subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant RT, but not with adjuvant RT. The improvement in OS with neoadjuvant RT was supported by a population-based study from NCDB, while results from two population-based studies investigating adjuvant RT were conflicting.

CONCLUSION

Taking into account the limitations of the studies, our review of evidence suggests a possible role of RT in improving oncologic outcomes of select colon adenocarcinomas. Prospective studies are needed to definitively assess the value of RT for colon cancer.

The survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T4N2M0 colon cancer in the Modern Chemotherapy Era: evidence from the SEER database 2004-2015

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been established as the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the role of radiotherapy (RT) has not been fully confirmed in advanced colon cancer (LACC). We postulated that patients with pathological T4N2 locally advanced colon cancer would benefit more from RT. 6715 pT4N2M0 colon cancer patients were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching (PSM) with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards' models was performed to estimate prognosis. Before PSM, patients underwent RT had better OS and CSS as compared to patients did not receive RT (OS: 40.1% vs 27.6%, p < .001; CSS: 49.6% vs 41.1%, p = .002). After PSM, 239 matched pairs were formed for further analysis. RT group also presented significantly improved prognosis (OS: 40.1% vs 25.7%, p = .008; CSS: 49.6% vs 38.2%, p = .042). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that RT was a protective factor [OS：Hazard ratio (HR) =0.677, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 0.532-0.862, p = .002; CSS: HR = 0.708, 95% CI: 0.533-0.941, p = .018]. For pT4N2M0 colon cancer patients, the addition of RT seems to confer survival benefit as compared to patients who did not receive RT.

Surgery with and without adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with similar survival in T4 colon cancer

AIM

There is little evidence regarding the role of adjuvant radiotherapy for colon cancer. Despite this, national consensus guidelines recommend consideration of radiation for patients with T4 colon cancer. Large comparative studies may be beneficial in clarifying the potential benefit of postoperative radiation for this cohort.

METHOD

We compared the overall survival between patients treated with surgery with and without adjuvant radiation using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), as well as disease-specific survival using SEER. Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score matching were used to adjust for relevant confounders.

RESULTS

There were a total of 18 776 patients in the NCDB cohort and 9926 patients in the SEER cohort. After propensity score matching, there was no statistically significant difference in overall mortality between surgery with and without radiation in the NCDB [hazard ratio (HR) 1.11; 95% CI 0.93-1.31; P = 0.25] or in SEER (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.84-1.72; P = 0.32). Additionally, using SEER, we found no statistically significant difference in disease-specific mortality between these two groups (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.76-1.67; P = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

Using the NCDB and SEER, we found no statistically significant difference in overall survival or disease-specific survival between patients treated with and without adjuvant radiation. Further studies should evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on local control and prevention of recurrence-related morbidity in patients with T4 colon cancer.

Utilization of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Resected Colon Cancer and Its Effect on Outcome

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant radiation is generally not recommended for colon cancer but may be considered in certain clinical scenarios [advanced local disease (pT4) and/or positive margins]. Guidelines in this area are lacking; thus we analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patterns of care in this regard and any predictors for outcome.

METHODS

We queried the NCDB from 2004 to 2016 for patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the colon having pT4 and/or had positive margins on final pathology and who received adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of adjuvant radiation. A propensity score was used to perform matched Kaplan-Meier analysis. Propensity-adjusted Cox regression was used to identify predictors of overall survival.

RESULTS

We identified 23,325 patients meeting criteria, of whom 1711 (7%) received adjuvant radiation. Median follow-up was 36 months. The majority of patients were pT4 alone (65%). Predictors of adjuvant radiation were lower comorbidity score, younger age, more remote year of treatment, and both pT4 and positive margins. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed improved overall survival (OS) in patients with both pT4 and positive margins treated with radiation (median OS: 66 versus 47 months, p = 0.02). Receipt of adjuvant radiation was associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.86 (0.80-0.93) p = 0.0002] on Cox regression analysis. Increased age, higher comorbidity score, lower income, government insurance, and combined pT4/positive margins were indicative of worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Expectedly, adjuvant radiation use was relatively low but was associated with improved OS in patients with both pT4 and positive margins.

Postoperative Radiation for Pathologic Stage T4 Colon Cancers Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Previous small retrospective studies have suggested a benefit, mainly in preventing local recurrence, for postoperative radiation in nonmetastatic pathologic stage T4 colon cancers in patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Current guidelines recommend postoperative radiation in nonmetastatic T4 colon cancers with penetration to a fixed structure, as well as for all patients with positive surgical margins. We aimed to assess the survival benefit of postoperative radiation in individuals with T4 colon cancers who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2014), we identified 20,967 and 5882 individuals with nonmetastatic pathologic stage T4 colon cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy who had negative or positive surgical margins, respectively. We used multivariate Cox regression to evaluate the effect of postoperative radiation on overall survival. In a secondary analysis, we stratified individuals according to chemotherapy intensity, pathologic N stage, and primary tumor location.

RESULTS

Postoperative radiation did not improve overall survival in individuals with positive surgical margins (hazard ratio = 1.05 [95% CI, 0.96-1.16]). This lack of survival benefit was noted regardless of chemotherapy regimen used, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.11 (95% CI, 0.94-1.31) and 0.96 (0.85-1.09) for single-agent and doublet chemotherapy, respectively. Similarly, pathologic N stage and primary tumor location did not affect survival. In individuals with negative surgical margins, there was a detrimental effect for postoperative radiation, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.19 (95% CI, 1.10-1.29).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative radiation did not improve overall survival in individuals with pathologic stage T4 colon cancer who had either negative or positive surgical margins and who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: a Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

A paucity of data exists in the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NRT) for T4, non-metastatic colon cancer. This study was conducted to determine the effect of NRT on outcomes after resection for T4 colon cancer.

METHODS

All patients with non-metastatic resected clinical T4 colon cancer from 2000 to 2012 at a tertiary care center were included. The cohort was divided into two groups-those that received NRT and those that did not (non-NRT). The primary outcomes were margin-negative resection and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-one consecutive patients with non-metastatic clinical T4 colon cancer with a mean age of 65 years were included. NRT was used in 23 patients (17.4%). NRT group was noted to have non-statistically significant improvement in R0 resection rate (NRT 95.7% vs non-NRT 88.0%; p = 0.27) and local recurrence (NRT 4.3% vs non-NRT 15.7%; p = 0.15). There was a significant difference in T-stage downstaging between the two groups (NRT 30.4% vs non-NRT 6.5%; p = 0.007). In a bivariate analysis, NRT was associated with improved 5-year OS (NRT 76.4% vs non-NRT 51.5%; p = 0.03). This relationship did not persist in a Cox proportional hazard analysis that included age and comorbidity (HR 2.19; 95% CI 0.87-5.52; p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NRT in locally advanced T4 colon cancer is safe and associated with increased downstaging. While there was a trend toward improvement in local recurrence and the ability to obtain margin-negative resections in the NRT group, this was not significant. Significantly improved overall survival was not observed in a multivariable analysis.

Prognostic significance of adjuvant radiation therapy in adenocarcinoma of the cecum

Purpose

Local recurrence is a common failure pattern in adenocarcinoma of the cecum. This study aimed to investigate the potential role of adjuvant radiation therapy on oncologic outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma of the cecum.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was carried out at three large tertiary university hospitals. We analyzed the characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival of 162 patients with adenocarcinoma of the cecum that were treated and followed up between 2000 and 2013. All the patients had undergone a right hemicolectomy and received chemotherapy with (n = 48) or without (n = 114) adjuvant radiation therapy.

Results

The subjects were 65 females and 97 males with a median age of 56 years (range, 17 to 90 years) at diagnosis. The 5-year local control (LC), disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 72.7%, 57.2%, and 62.6% respectively. In a multivariate analysis, age, tumor stage, node stage, and adjuvant radiation therapy were determined to be independent prognostic factors. Age more than 55 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06–0.32; p = 0.003], T4 stage (HR = 6.8; 95% CI, 3.07–15.36; p < 0.001), node positive disease (HR = 4.2; 95% CI, 1.94–9.13; p < 0.001), and the absence of adjuvant radiation therapy (HR = 3.0; 95% CI, 1.39–6.46; p = 0.005) had a negative influence on OS.

Conclusion

Adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improves DFS and OS in patients with adenocarcinoma of the cecum.

A Blueprint to Advance Colorectal Cancer Immunotherapies

Immunotherapy is rapidly becoming a standard of care for many cancers. However, colorectal cancer had been generally resistant to immunotherapy, despite features in common with sensitive tumors. Observations of substantial clinical activity for checkpoint blockade in colorectal cancers with defective mismatch repair (microsatellite instability-high tumors) have reignited interest in the search for immunotherapies that could be extended to the larger microsatellite stable (MSS) population. The Cancer Research Institute and Fight Colorectal Cancer convened a group of scientists, clinicians, advocates, and industry experts in colorectal cancer and immunotherapy to compile ongoing research efforts, identify gaps in translational and clinical research, and provide a blueprint to advance immunotherapy. We identified lack of a T-cell inflamed phenotype (due to inadequate T-cell infiltration, inadequate T-cell activation, or T-cell suppression) as a broad potential explanation for failure of checkpoint blockade in MSS. The specific cellular and molecular underpinnings for these various mechanisms are unclear. Whether biomarkers with prognostic value, such as the immunoscores and IFN signatures, would also predict benefit for immunotherapies in MSS colon cancer is unknown, but if so, these and other biomarkers for measuring the potential for an immune response in patients with colorectal cancer will need to be incorporated into clinical guidelines. We have proposed a framework for research to identify immunologic factors that may be modulated to improve immunotherapy for colorectal cancer patients, with the goal that the biomarkers and treatment strategies identified will become part of the routine management of colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Res; 5(11); 942-9. ©2017 AACR.

Neoadjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy followed by radical resection in patients with locally advanced colon cancer

Background

Patients with locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) have a relatively poor prognosis despite radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. This study investigated the treatment efficacy and toxicity of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with LACC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients with LACC preoperatively treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Patients were administered chemoradiotherapy, which comprised radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving a 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin regimen every 2 weeks.

Results

Median age was 64 years (45–86 years) and median follow-up period was 23.5 months (5.0–49.1 months). Seven (19.4%) patients developed grade 3 or 4 adverse events during neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Pathologic responses were not evaluated in two patients who did not undergo radical resection. Of the 34 patients who underwent surgery, nine (26.4%) achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). The 2-year estimated overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 88.7% and 73.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is feasible and safe. A prominent pCR rate with an acceptable toxicity profile suggests that the multimodality therapy might be a treatment option for patients with LACC.

Outcomes of preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with unresectable locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Complete resection of locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer (LASCC) is sometimes difficult. Patients with LASCC have a dismal prognosis and poor quality of life, which has encouraged the evaluation of alternative multimodality treatments. This prospective study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neoCRT) followed by surgery as treatment of selected patients with unresectable LASCC.

METHODS

We studied the patients with unresectable LASCC who received neoCRT followed by surgery between October 2010 and December 2012. The neoadjuvant regimen consisted of external-beam radiotherapy to 50 Gy and capecitabine-based chemotherapy every 3 weeks. Surgery was scheduled 6-8 weeks after radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included in this study. The median follow-up was 42 months (range, 17-57 months). All patients completed neoCRT and surgery. Resection with microscopically negative margins (R0 resection) was achieved in 20 patients (95.2%). Pathologic complete response was observed in 8 patients (38.1%). Multivisceral resection was necessary in only 7 patients (33.3%). Two patients (9.5%) experienced grade 2 postoperative complications. No patients died within 30 days after surgery. For 18 patients with pathologic M0 (ypM0) disease, the cumulative probability of 3-year local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival was 100.0%, 88.9% and 100.0%, respectively. For all 21 patients, the cumulative probability of 3-year overall survival was 95.2% and bladder function was well preserved.

CONCLUSION

For patients with unresectable LASCC, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery can be performed safely and may result in an increased survival rate.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and multivisceral resection for primary locally advanced adherent colon cancer: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Although there is an extensive body of literature on the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the management of rectal cancer, its role in primary locally advanced adherent colon cancer (LAACC) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To analyzed the outcomes of neoadjuvant CRT and multivisceral resection in the management of LAACC patietns.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional Colorectal Carcinoma Database for 33 patients with potentially resectable, non-metastatic primary LAACC who received neoadjuvant CRT followed by multivisceral resection. CRT consisted of external beam radiation (45-50 Gy in 25 daily fractions) and concurrent 5-FU infusion (225 mg/m(2)/day).

RESULTS

There were 21 males and 12 females. Median age was 64 (31-83) and median follow-up was 36 months. All patients had microscopically clear resection margins (R0). Complete pathologic response was documented in 1 patient (3%) and 66% had ypT4b disease. Post-operative complications were observed in 36% of patients with no 30-day mortality. The 3-year overall survival and 3-year disease-free survival were 85.9% and 73.7% respectively. Two patients developed a local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant CRT and en-bloc multivisceral resection may result in high rates of R0 resection and excellent local control with acceptable morbidity and mortality in selected patients with LAACC.

Challenges in the management of stage II colon cancer

Approximately one third of patients diagnosed with early-stage colon cancer will present with lymph node involvement (stage III) and about one quarter with transmural bowel wall invasion but negative lymph nodes (stage II). Adjuvant chemotherapy targets micrometastatic disease to improve disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). While beneficial for stage III patients, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unestablished in stage II disease. This likely relates to the improved outcome of these patients, and the difficulties in developing studies with sufficient power to document benefit in this patient population. However, recent investigation also suggests that molecular differences may exist between stage II and III cancers and within stage II patients. Validated pathologic prognostic markers are useful at identifying stage II patients at high risk for recurrence for whom the benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy may be greater. Such high-risk features include higher T stage (T4 v T3), suboptimal lymph node retrieval, presence of lymphovascular invasion, bowel obstruction, or bowel perforation, and poorly differentiated histology. However, for the majority of patients who do not carry any of these adverse features and are classified as "average-risk" stage II patients, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unproven. Emerging understanding of the underlying biology of stage II colon cancer has identified molecular markers that may change this paradigm and improve our risk assessment and treatment choices for stage II disease. Assessment of microsatellite stability (MSI), which serves as a marker for DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system function, has emerged as a useful tool for risk stratification of patients with stage II colon cancer. Patients with high frequency of MSI have been shown to have increased OS and limited benefit from 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. Additional research is necessary to clearly define the most appropriate way to use this marker and others in routine clinical practice.

Surgical management of locally advanced and locally recurrent colon cancer

Locally advanced and locally recurrent colon cancers pose a surgical challenge with tumors extending into surrounding structures and organs. Anticipation of the need for an extended surgical resection, often with multivisceral en bloc organ removal, is critical for surgical planning. For both primary and recurrent tumors, postsurgical long-term survival is achievable but only after complete resection. The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy continues to be redefined in this era of biologic chemotherapeutics, and multimodality therapy holds promise in aiding resection and improving postsalvage survival.

External beam radiotherapy for colon cancer: patterns of care

PURPOSE

Despite its common and well characterized use in other gastrointestinal malignancies, little is known about radiotherapy (RT) use in nonmetastatic colon cancer in the United States. To address the paucity of data regarding RT use in colon cancer management, we examined the RT patterns of care in this patient population.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer, diagnosed between 1988 and 2005, were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate methods were used to identify factors associated with RT use.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, tumor location, age, sex, race, T stage, N stage, and geographic location were each associated with differences in RT use (all p < 0.01). In general, younger patients, male patients, and patients with more advanced disease were more likely to receive RT. On multivariate analysis, tumor location, age, gender, T and N stage, time of diagnosis and geographic location were significantly associated with RT use (all p < 0.001). Race, however, was not associated with RT use. On multivariate analysis, patients diagnosed in 1988 were 2.5 times more likely to receive RT than those diagnosed in 2005 (p = 0.001). Temporal changes in RT use reflect a responsiveness to evolving evidence related to the therapeutic benefits of adjuvant RT.

CONCLUSIONS

External beam RT is infrequently used for colon cancer, and its use varies according to patient and tumor characteristics. RT use has declined markedly since the late 1980s; however, it continues to be used for nonmetastatic disease in a highly individualized manner.

Primary Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Appendix Treated with Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy: A Case Report

A rare case of primary appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma is reported. The presenting signs and symptoms were suggestive of acute appendicitis. An appendectomy was performed resulting in a histological diagnosis of grade 2 mucinous adenocarcinoma of the appendix. The patient was referred to our clinic where he underwent a complementary right hemicolectomy with lymph node dissection. Two of the 17 resected lymph nodes were tumor positive but there was no residual tumor in the hemicolectomy specimen. The patient was staged as T4N1M0 and adjuvant multimodality treatment was planned because he was considered at high risk for local-regional recurrence and distant metastasis. Three cycles of capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1–14 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 21 days (CAPOX) were administered, then a total dose of 50.4 Gy external-beam radiation therapy was deliveredtothe primarytumor region and 45 Gy to the lymphatics, and finally3 further cycles of the CAPOX regimen were administered. Multimodality treatment was well tolerated by the patient, who is still alive 25 months after the hemicolectomy procedure with no evidence of disease progression.

Successful downstaging of high rectal and recto-sigmoid cancer by neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The benefit of neoadjuvant therapy for tumours above the peritoneal reflection is not clear. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and downstaging of treating locally advanced tumours from high rectum to distal sigmoid with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventeen patients with high rectal, rectosigmoid or distal sigmoid tumours above the peritoneal reflection received neoadjuvant CRT, selected on MRI findings indicating T4 disease or threatened circumferential resection margin. All patients were administered neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with Oxaliplatin or Mitomycin C and a Fluoropyrimidine. The pelvis received long-course CT-planned conformal RT, 45 Gy in 25 fractions, with a boost of 5.4-9 Gy in 3-5 fractions. Thirteen patients were treated with concomitant oral or intravenous Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 37 months. Overall survival was 82.35% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 54.7-93.9) and disease free survival 81.25% (95% CI 52.5-93.5). Only 1 patient suffered loco-regional relapse. Chemotherapy regimens were well tolerated, though some patients required dose reductions. Nine patients (52.9%) lowered pathologic disease AJCC stage, i.e. 'downstaged'. Six patients (35.3%) achieved complete pathological response. Clear margins were attained in all but 1 patient. Three patients were converted from cT4 to ypT3. No patient required a gap during CRT. One patient suffered a grade III acute toxicity, but no grade IV (RTOG). There were 3 grade III and 3 grade IV late toxicities (LENT-SOMA).

CONCLUSIONS

Locally advanced high rectal and recto-sigmoid tumours may be treated with pre-operative CRT with acceptable toxicity, impressive down-staging, and clear surgical margins.

The role of radiation therapy for colorectal cancer

Radiation therapy (RT) has been used to treat cancers for more than a century. Recent randomized trials have helped clarify the treatment recommendations in the use of RT for colorectal cancers. This article reviews these trials to illustrate key concepts, places these trials in perspective, and provides direction for future research.

Colorectal cancer

Cancers of the colon and rectum will affect 1 in 17 North Americans during their lifetime. The progress witnessed in the treatment of these cancers in recent years has been remarkable. Improvements have been realized in surgical technique, radiation therapy, and systemic therapies, particularly with the addition of oxaliplatin and irinotecan to the previously limited armamentarium of fluorouracil alone. Targeted therapies directed at the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway and the epidermal growth factor pathway are now key players in the treatment of colorectal cancer. With current-day therapies, more than 75% of patients with localized disease are recurrence free at 3 years, and up to 50% of patients with advanced unresectable disease are alive at 2 years. This review focuses on the evidence supporting the current role of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the adjuvant management of colorectal cancers and the strategy of combining chemotherapy and biological therapy in the treatment of metastatic disease.

Colorectal cancer

Cancers of the colon and rectum will affect 1 in 17 North Americans during their lifetime. The progress witnessed in the treatment of these cancers in recent years has been remarkable. Improvements have been realized in surgical technique, radiation therapy, and systemic therapies, particularly with the addition of oxaliplatin and irinotecan to the previously limited armamentarium of fluorouracil alone. Targeted therapies directed at the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway and the epidermal growth factor pathway are now key players in the treatment of colorectal cancer. With current-day therapies, more than 75% of patients with localized disease are recurrence free at 3 years, and up to 50% of patients with advanced unresectable disease are alive at 2 years. This review focuses on the evidence supporting the current role of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the adjuvant management of colorectal cancers and the strategy of combining chemotherapy and biological therapy in the treatment of metastatic disease.

Radiation therapy for gastrointestinal cancer

This article has reviewed the current role of radiation in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies and discussed the data supporting its use. Radiation treatment in this setting continues to evolve with the increasing implementation of more conformal delivery techniques. Further scientific investigation is needed to establish the optimal role of radiation and to better define its integration with novel systemic and biologic modalities.

Phase II study of vitamin E and pentoxifylline in patients with late side effects of pelvic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation-induced tissue fibrosis is a common adverse effect of curative treatment for pelvic cancer. Pilot studies testing alpha-tocopherol and pentoxifylline provide evidence of clinical regression of superficial radiation fibrosis after radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven eligible research volunteers with a minimum of one grade 3 or 4 disability (LENT SOMA) due to previous radiotherapy were entered into the study. Volunteers were given dl-alpha tocopheryl acetate 500 mg twice a day orally plus pentoxifylline 400mg twice a day orally over a period of 6 months. Clinical assessment of late side effects recorded using LENT SOMA scales was selected as the primary endpoint, taken at baseline and at 6 and 12 months post-registration. Patient self-assessment of function and quality of life was assessed as a secondary endpoint using the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-CR38 pelvic module. Magnetic resonance imaging was undertaken in 13/23 evaluable volunteers before and after 6 months of therapy.

RESULTS

At 12 months post-registration there were 4 out of 23 responders. At 6 months post-registration there was a statistically significant improvement (i.e. reduction) in the median of the LENT SOMA summed scores in all areas assessed apart from 'male sexual dysfunction', 'vulva' and 'vagina' which were unchanged at 6 months. The median total LENT SOMA score at baseline and 6 months was 49 and 34, respectively, with a median change in total LENT SOMA score between baseline and 6 months of 9 (IQR 7-18) (P<0.001). The maximum LENT SOMA scores improved over the study period, with a total number of 82 maximum grade 3 or 4 normal tissue scores at baseline (median of four complications per person) reduced to a total number of 67 maximum grade 3 or 4 scores at 6 months post-registration (median of 3 complications per person), i.e. a median reduction in severe complications of one per person. LENT SOMA scores at 12 months were similar to those observed at 6 month suggesting no further improvement nor deterioration in late side effects. These findings were, however, not reflected in the patient self-assessment of function and quality of life, raising question about the possibility of observer bias in recording LENT SOMA scores. No significant changes were reported on magnetic resonance images at 6 months from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite only seeing four a priori defined responders in this pilot study testing dl-alpha tocopheryl acetate plus pentoxifylline in patients suffering complications of pelvic radiotherapy, changes in LENT SOMA scores suggest beneficial effects. However, we are not convinced that these effects are real, since no significant changes in symptoms and functional status were recorded by detailed prospective patient self-assessments.

The retroperitoneal surface in distal caecal and proximal ascending colon carcinoma: the Cinderella surgical margin?

BACKGROUND

Mesorectal margin tumour involvement is a predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma and an indication for postoperative radiotherapy in suitable patients. However, the prevalence of non-peritonealised surgical margin involvement in ascending colon carcinoma is unknown.

AIMS

To test the hypothesis that retroperitoneal surgical margin (RSM) tumour involvement occurs in distal caecal and proximal ascending colon carcinoma.

METHODS/RESULTS

One hundred right hemicolectomy specimens, removed for adenocarcinoma of the caecum or proximal ascending colon, were studied. During routine specimen dissection, at least one additional tissue block was taken to include the tumour and the RSM. The tumour distance from the RSM was recorded. RSM tumour involvement was present in seven cases (7%). Direct (non-nodal) RSM tumour involvement (five cases) only occurred in posterior or circumferential tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

RSM tumour involvement occurs within a considerable number of distal caecal and proximal ascending colon carcinomas. The rate of RSM tumour involvement identified here is similar to a previously published local recurrence rate of 10% in caecal carcinoma, suggesting that RSM tumour involvement may be a predictor of recurrence in these tumours. Therefore, patients with distal caecal or proximal ascending colon carcinoma and RSM tumour involvement may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy.

Colon cancer

Colon cancer is one of the leading tumours in the world and is considered among the big killers, together with lung, prostate and breast cancer. In the recent years very important advances occurred in the field of treatment of this frequent disease: adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be effective, chiefly in stage III patients, and surgery was optimized in order to achieve the best results with a low morbidity. Several new target-oriented drugs are under evaluation and some of them (cetuximab and bevacizumab) have already exhibited a good activity/efficacy, mainly in combination with chemotherapy. The development of updated recommendations for the best management of these patients is crucial in order to obtain the best results, not only in clinical research but also in everyday practice. This report summarizes the most important achievements in this field and provides the readers useful suggestions for their professional practice.

Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy for colon carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this report was to review the role of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon.

METHODS

The authors reviewed the pertinent literature.

RESULTS

Data suggested that locoregional postoperative RT improves both local control and survival for patients with T4N0-N1 tumors. There also may be a benefit for patients with T3N1-N2 tumors, but the data were equivocal. Whole abdominal RT may result in a similar benefit but is associated with increased toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative RT should be considered for patients with T4N0-N1 colon carcinoma. Locoregional fields should be used.

Phase III Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone in the Surgical Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer: Results of Intergroup Protocol 0130

Purpose

Some patients with colon cancer have a high risk of local recurrence postoperatively. This trial was undertaken to determine whether radiation therapy added to an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen improves outcome in high-risk patients.

Patients and Methods

Patients with resected colon cancer with tumor adherence or invasion of surrounding structures, or with T3N1 or T3N2 tumors of the ascending or descending colon were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil and levamisole therapy with or without radiation therapy. Patients who received chemotherapy and radiation therapy (chemoRT) received 45 to 50.4 Gy in 25 to 28 fractions beginning 28 days after starting chemotherapy. Patient enrollment was terminated because of slow accrual after 222 patients enrolled (original goal was 700 patients); 187 patients were assessable.

Results

Overall 5-year survival was 62% for chemotherapy patients and 58% for chemoRT patients (P > .50); 5-year disease-free survival was 51% for both groups (P > .50). Toxicity (≥ grade 3) occurred in 42% of chemotherapy patients and 54% of chemoRT patients (P = .04). Leukopenia (≥ grade 3) occurred in 10% of chemotherapy patients and 22% of chemoRT patients (P = .02). No significant difference in nonhematologic toxicity (≥ grade 3) was observed between chemoRT and chemotherapy patients (35% v 44%; P = .26).

Conclusion

Patients who received chemotherapy or chemoRT had similar overall survival and disease-free survival. Toxicity was higher among chemoRT patients. These results must be interpreted with caution because of the high number of ineligible patients and the limited power of the study to detect potentially meaningful differences.

The importance of palliative care for patients with colorectal cancer

In Westernized countries colorectal cancer is a very common form of cancer, with over 30,000 cases registered annually in the UK (Taylor et al, 2002). Cancer of the large bowel is the second most common cause of cancer death, with over 17,000 cases per year (Cancer Research Campaign (CRC), 1999). Bowel cancer is related to age, with as many as 80% of cases in people who are 60 years or over. Eighty per cent of patients undergo surgery with curative intent but recurrence will occur in half of these cases (National Cancer Institute, 2001). Palliative care is a person-centred approach that provides essential support to patients with bowel and colorectal cancer with an emphasis on symptom control, and psychological and social support. Care for this group of patients depends on an interdisciplinary approach with mutual respect for all the team members and good communication that enables the patient, where possible, to be involved in any decision-making about care and treatment.

Multimodality management of locally recurrent colorectal cancer

The combined management of locally recurrent colorectal cancer shows considerable promise, but the best way to incorporate the different treatment modalities and the potential benefits remain uncertain. The case series mentioned here were derived from highly selected groups from a much larger population of patients with recurrent disease; thus fully combined management may be only appropriate for a minority of people with recurrent disease. There is a need for multicenter randomized trials to better delineate the real benefits from the combined approach. Multimodality management of recurrent colorectal cancer, however, involves more than the combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy for a select minority of resectable patients. It involves the use of each modality to its greatest advantage for all patients, as determined by a multidisciplinary team of specialists. We should also not confine our attention to the treatment aspects of recurrent disease alone, as the greatest promise for improved survival could be with a more general application of total mesorectal excision. Because most people who develop local recurrence of colorectal cancer will die from their disease, the main contribution of a multimodality approach may be towards palliation.

Chemoradiation with novel agents for rectal cancer

Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer. Although the role of radiation therapy in colon cancer is unclear, its role in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer has been extensively studied in clinical trials. The use of postoperative chemoradiotherapy has been shown to improve local control and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced disease over surgery alone; however, an overall survival advantage remains unproven. Clinical trials evaluating preoperative radiotherapy have demonstrated an improved local control as well as a survival advantage. Randomized studies comparing preoperative versus postoperative combined-modality approaches have failed in the United States, mainly due to the perceived advantages of preoperative treatment: improved patient tolerance, tumor downstaging, and fewer treatment-related complications. While 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy remains the standard systemic agent used along with radiation, other novel agents and strategies have recently been developed and are under investigation. In this review, we discuss the use of novel anticancer agents in combination with radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

The Mayo Clinic experience with multimodality treatment of locally advanced or recurrent colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with incompletely resected locally advanced and recurrent colon cancers have a dismal prognosis. Since 1981, 100 colon cancer patients have been treated with combination therapy including surgical resection, chemotherapy, and external plus intraoperative radiotherapy.

METHODS

A prospective computerized intraoperative radiation database identified patients for this retrospective review. Data collection included patient demographics, tumor and treatment variables, and morbidity, recurrence, and survival statistics.

RESULTS

The mean age was 55.2 years. Follow-up was available for all patients. Fifty-nine patients have died. Median follow-up of survivors was 70.5 months. Twenty-five patients with locally advanced colon cancer had a median survival of 38.2 months and a 5-year survival of 49%. Eleven of these patients are still free of disease. Seventy-three patients treated for recurrent colon carcinoma had a median survival of 33.3 months from the time of recurrence, with a 5-year survival of 24.7%. Twenty-one are alive without evidence of recurrence. The 38 patients with recurrent disease whose disease was completely resected had a 37.4% 5-year survival.

CONCLUSIONS

A multimodality approach using en-bloc surgical resection with radiotherapy and chemotherapy affords some patients with locally advanced and recurrent colon cancer a chance for long-term survival.

Adjuvant therapy of colon cancer: a review

Colon cancer is a common cause of cancer-related mortality. Complete surgical resection of the primary tumor and/or select metastatic lesions can be curative in many patients. The risk of recurrence after resection can be predicted by pathologic staging. Large prospective randomized trials over the past 2 decades have clearly shown an increased overall survival for patients with resected stage III colon cancer who are treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II disease remains controversial. There is indirect evidence to support adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of metastatic disease. Locoregional approaches such as radiation, hepatic arterial infusion, or portal vein chemotherapy remain investigational. Adjuvant immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies is emerging as a therapeutic option that might complement chemotherapy. Future challenges include improving adjuvant chemotherapy with the addition and/or substitution of new agents, resolving which subset of patients with stage II and resected stage IV colon cancer might benefit from therapy, validating the benefit of immunotherapy, and investigating locoregional therapies compared with systemic therapy.

Liposome-encapsulated tumor necrosis factor-alpha enhances the effects of radiation against human colon tumor xenografts

Recent reports have shown that tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) can augment the effects of radiation against certain tumor types. However, the high concentrations of intravenous infusion of TNF-alpha needed to cause tumor regression can induce many systemic side effects. The aims of this study were to determine if TNF-alpha encapsulated in sterically stabilized (Stealth, ALZA Corporation, Mountain View, CA), PEGylated liposomes (SL) augments the antitumor effects of radiation and to compare its efficacy and possible toxicity with free TNF-alpha in the LS174T human colon tumor xenograft model. Nude mice were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with LS174T cells and treated intravenously (i.v.) with Stealth-liposomal TNF-alpha (SL-TNF-alpha) with and without radiation or TNF-alpha with or without radiation when tumor size was approximately 200 mm(3). In phase 1, a significant decrease (p = 0.047) in tumor growth was observed with radiation at day 21 but not with SL-TNF-alpha or free TNF-alpha alone. By the end of phase 1 (day 27) with continued treatments, the SL-TNF-alpha plus radiation group had significantly smaller tumors (p = 0.044) than those in the free TNF-alpha plus radiation group. In phase 2, where a similar tumor growth reduction pattern was observed, the addition of TNF-alpha to radiation, either as free protein or within SL, increased lymphocyte activation and natural killer (NK) cell numbers in both blood and spleen. The effect was generally more pronounced with SL-TNF-alpha. Systemic toxicity, based on hematologic analyses and body weight, was absent or minimal. Collectively, the data show that pretreatment with SL-TNF-alpha can enhance more effectively, and possibly more safely, the effects of radiation against human colon tumor xenografts than can free TNF-alpha and that the increased antitumor action may involve upregulation of lymphocytes.

Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions by using Seprafilm in rats undergoing bowel resection and radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

Intra-abdominal adhesions are an important surgical problem. Colorectal operations are a major cause of adhesive obstruction. Radiation therapy (RT) is frequently used as an adjuvant therapy to surgery for rectal cancer, though its value for colon carcinoma remains unclear. Peritoneal injuries including the surgical trauma, tissue ischaemia as well as RT are associated with peritoneal fibrinolytic activity. A sodium hyaluronate and carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) has been used to reduce intra-abdominal adhesion formation. We have investigated the effect of Seprafilm on intra-abdominal adhesion in rats receiving RT after the resection of the left colon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two male Wistar rats were divided into two groups: group 1 (n=16), control (colon resection, no Seprafilm); group 2 (n=16), study group (colon resection and Seprafilm). All the rats received 50 Gy RT after left colon resection. Intra-abdominal adhesions were evaluated by grading and measurement of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) as a tissue adhesion marker in peritoneal samples from the rats. tPA was determined using a commercially available ELISA kit.

RESULTS

The levels of tPA were significantly increased in group 2 rats compared with those in the control group (P=0.0276). It was also seen that adhesions in the rats receiving Seprafilm were significantly less severe than those in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the intraperitoneal administration of Seprafilm reduced the frequency and strength of adhesions.

Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that health insurance payer and race might influence the care and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We examined treatments received for all incident cases of colorectal cancer occurring in Florida in 1994 (n = 9551), using state tumor registry data. We also estimated the adjusted risk of death (through 1997), using proportional hazards regression analysis controlling for other predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

Treatments received by patients varied considerably according to their insurance payer. Among non-Medicare patients, those in the following groups had higher adjusted risks of death relative to commercial fee-for-service insurance: commercial HMO (risk ratio [RR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18, 1.67; P = .0001), Medicaid (RR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.97; P = .02), and uninsured (RR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.12, 1.77; P = .003). Non-Hispanic African Americans had higher mortality rates (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.37; P = .04) than non-Hispanic Whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with colorectal cancer who were uninsured or insured by Medicaid or commercial HMOs had higher mortality rates than patients with commercial fee-for-service insurance. Mortality was also higher among non-Hispanic African American patients.

Tumor thickness is a histopathologic predictive parameter of tumor metastasis and prognosis in patients with Dukes stage C ulcerative-type colorectal carcinoma. A two-hospital-based study

BACKGROUND

Metastasis to the liver or lymph nodes is an important prognostic factor in patients with colorectal carcinoma. The purpose of the current study was to estimate the power of tumor thickness in predicting metachronous liver metastasis (MLM), lymph node metastasis (LNM), or overall survival (OS) in patients at two hospitals (the National Cancer Center Hospital [NCCH] and the National Cancer Center Hospital East [NCCHE]) to confirm the reproducibility of the study.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 74 and 186 consecutive patients with ulcerative-type colorectal carcinoma treated at the NCCH and NCCHE, respectively. Tumor thickness was measured in three areas: 1) the marginal elevated area (MEA), 2) the central depressed area (CDA), and 3) the most thickened area (MTA). Studies were performed with well known histologic parameters to compare the predictive power of tumor thickness on MLM, LNM, and OS using the Cox proportional hazards regression model or analysis of variance.

RESULTS

A significant correlation between tumor thickness and MLM was observed only in the CDA in the NCCH patients (P = 0.005). The authors applied a tumor thickness cutoff value in the CDA of 10 mm (</= 10 mm and > 10 mm) for further study. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that a tumor CDA thickness > 10 mm was associated significantly with MLM, multiple LNMs, and OS in NCCH patients with Dukes Stage C disease (P = 0.002, P = 0.023, and P = 0.002, respectively). A significant predictive power for tumor CDA thickness for MLM, multiple LNMs, and OS was confirmed by multivariate analysis in NCCHE patients with Dukes Stage C disease (P = 0.008, P = 0.021, and P = 0.010, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The CDA thickness of the tumor was found to be a useful predictive parameter for MLM, multiple LNMs, and OS in patients with Dukes Stage C ulcerative-type colorectal carcinoma who were being treated in two independent hospitals.

Phase II trial of adjuvant radiation and intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced colon cancer: results with 10-year follow-up

PURPOSE

To determine the toxicity, disease-free survival, and overall survival for patients with Modified Astler-Coller (MAC) B2-3 or C1-3 colon cancer receiving adjuvant radiation and sequential intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From August 1984 to June 1989, 45 patients were accrued to this Phase II trial and received a 21-week course of intraperitoneal 5-FU (20 mg/kg/d x 5) and external beam radiation. The radiation was delivered to the tumor bed and para-aortic lymph nodes in two split-courses of 22.5 Gy, alternating with the first two cycles of chemotherapy. All patients then received 4 additional cycles of intraperitoneal 5-FU.

RESULTS

The therapy was well tolerated with 4 patients experiencing Grade 3 peritonitis. Four patients developed small bowel obstruction requiring surgery; in each instance, recurrent tumor was found at the time of laparotomy. The median and overall survivals at 10 years were 9.3 months and 53% respectively. Local failures were infrequent, occurring in only 11% of patients treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential intraperitoneal 5-FU and tumor-bed/para-aortic irradiation is tolerable in patients with resected colon cancer. Although the incidence of local and regional relapse appeared to be lower than anticipated, this did not appear to translate into improved survival.

Radiation therapy of the older patient

Radiotherapy has a major role in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer therapy. It is widely used for curative and palliative treatment of cancer involving various sites. Radiotherapy is of particular benefit to older and frail cancer patients as an alternative to surgery and to systemic therapy. The available data on the sensitivity of normal tissues to radiotherapy in elderly patients strongly suggest that older patients with good functional status tolerate radiotherapy as well as younger patients and have comparable tumor response and survival rates. Aggressive radiotherapy should not be withheld from older patients because of chronological age alone.