Does administration of chemotherapy before radiotherapy in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery negatively impact local control?

When metal-organic framework mediated smart drug delivery meets gastrointestinal cancers

Cancers of the gastrointestinal tract constitute one of the most common cancer types worldwide and a ∼58% increase in the global number of cases has been estimated by IARC for the next twenty years. Recent advances in drug delivery technologies have attracted scientific interest for developing and utilizing efficient therapeutic systems. The present review focuses on the use of nanoscale MOFs (Nano-MOFs) as carriers for drug delivery and imaging purposes. In pursuit of significant improvements to current gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy regimens, systems that allow multiple concomitant therapeutic options (polytherapy) and controlled release are highly desirable. In this sense, MOF-based nanotherapeutics represent a significant step towards achieving this goal. Here, the current state-of-the-art of interdisciplinary research and novel developments into MOF-based gastrointestinal cancer therapy are highlighted and reviewed.

Integrating Adjuvant Radiation with Post-Neoadjuvant Therapies in Early Breast Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Because of the strong prognostic value of pathologic complete response (pCR) in early breast cancer (EBC), patients who fail to achieve this outcome have increasingly been eligible to a new treatment modality, namely post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (PNT). However, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) retains a crucial role in EBC, and also needs to be timely administered to patients. To address how modern PNT optimally integrates with adjuvant RT is therefore the purpose of this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

How PNT administration optimally integrates with adjuvant RT has varied depending on the type of systemic therapy employed. The introduction of novel "targeted" agents has created new challenges, as for many of them limited information is available on the feasibility of concurrent systemic and RT administration or their optimal sequencing. PNT and RT are both of utmost importance to the management of EBC and need to be timely and safely administered to patients. The optimal strategy to integrate these modalities may vary according to the type of PNT agent and other factors.

Radiotherapy in Italy after Conservative Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. A Survey by the Italian Society of Radiation Oncology (AIRO)

Aims and Background

The aim of surveys on clinical practice is to stimulate discussion and optimize practice. In this paper the current Italian radiotherapy practice after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer is described and adherence to national and international guidelines is assessed. Furthermore, results are compared with an earlier survey in northern Italy and international reports.

Study Design

A multiple-choice questionnaire sent to all 138 Italian radiation oncology centers.

Results

48% of centers responded. Most performed breast-conserving surgery when tumor size was ≤3 cm. All centers routinely performed axillary dissection; 45 carried out sentinel node biopsy followed by axillary dissection when the sentinel node was positive. Most centers re-excised when resection margins were positive. The median interval between surgery and radiotherapy, when chemotherapy was not administered, was 60 days. Adjuvant chemotherapy was preferably administered before radiotherapy. Regional lymph nodes were never irradiated in 10 centers; in all others irradiation depended on the number of positive lymph nodes and/or involvement of axillary fat and/or tumor location in medial quadrants. All centers used standard fractionation; hypofractionated schemes were available in 6. Most centers used 4–6 MV photons. In 59 centers the boost dose of 10 Gy could be increased if margins were not negative. All centers ensured patient setup reproducibility. Treatment planning was computerized in 59 centers. The irradiation dose was prescribed at the ICRU point in 56 centers and portal films were made in 54 centers. Intraoperative radiotherapy was used in 4 centers: for partial breast irradiation in 1 and for boost administration in 3 centers.

Conclusions

Although the quality of radiotherapy delivery has improved in Italy in recent years, approaches that do not conform to international standards persist.

The Sequencing of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients after Mastectomy

Background

The purpose of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcome according to the sequencing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy after mastectomy in high-risk patients with breast cancer.

Methods

From January 1986 through September 2000, 275 women with stage I-IIIB breast cancer were treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy after mastectomy. The patients were divided into four groups. Chemotherapy was given first in 116 patients (CTRT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy in 77 (CCRT), sandwich therapy in 65 (SAND), and radiotherapy first in 17 (RTCT). Prognostic factors such as age, primary tumor size and nodal status were not statistically different among the four groups. There was a higher proportion of patients with close or positive margins in CCRT and RTCT groups than in the CTRT and SAND groups (22/77, 5/17 vs 3/116, 2/65, P <0.001).

Results

Median follow-up was 145 months (range, 10–210). Five-year overall and disease-free survival were 69.4% and 56.1%, respectively. Survival outcomes were not statistically different among the four groups (5-year overall/disease-free survival, 68.0%/63.0%, 71.3%/60.8%, 65.0%/48.1%, 81.9%/58.8%, in CTRT, CCRT, SAND, and RTCT, respectively) (P = 0.3422/P = 0.6333). The incidence of local-regional recurrence was not different in the early radiotherapy group (CCRT/RTCT, 11%/12%) and delayed radiotherapy group (CTRT/SAND, 7%/8%).

Conclusions

This study suggests that in these high-risk breast cancer patients after mastectomy, delay in the start of radiotherapy does not increase local-regional recurrence, and the final survival outcomes are not affected by the sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Impact of Sequencing Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy on Long-Term Local Toxicity for Early Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomized Study at 15-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To compare long-term late local toxicity after either concomitant or sequential chemoradiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1997 to 2002, women aged 18 to 75 years who underwent breast-conserving surgery and axillary dissection for early breast cancer and in whom CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy was planned were randomized between concomitant and sequential radiation therapy. Radiation therapy was delivered to the whole breast through tangential fields to 50 Gy in 20 fractions over a period of 4 weeks, followed by an electron boost. Surviving patients were tentatively contacted and examined between March and September 2014. Patients in whom progressive disease had developed or who had undergone further breast surgery were excluded. Local toxicity (fibrosis, telangiectasia, and breast atrophy or retraction) was scored blindly to the treatment received. A logistic regression was run to investigate the effect of treatment sequence after correction for several patient-, treatment-, and tumor-related covariates on selected endpoints. The median time to cross-sectional analysis was 15.7 years (range, 12.0-17.8 years).

RESULTS

Of 206 patients randomized, 154 (74.8%) were potentially eligible. Of these, 43 (27.9%) refused participation and 4 (2.6%) had been lost to follow-up, and for 5 (3.2%), we could not restore planning data; thus, the final number of analyzed patients was 102. No grade 4 toxicity had been observed, whereas the number of grade 3 toxicity events was low (<8%) for each item, allowing pooling of grade 2 and 3 events for further analysis. Treatment sequence (concomitant vs sequential) was an independent predictor of grade 2 or 3 fibrosis according to both the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (odds ratio [OR], 4.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-12.2; P=.013) and the SOMA (Subjective, Objective, Management and Analytic) scale (OR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.19-11.79; P=.018), as well as grade 2 or 3 breast atrophy or retraction (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.42-10.56; P=.008). No effect on telangiectasia was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

At long-term follow-up, concomitant chemoradiation therapy has a detrimental effect on both fibrosis and retraction with an approximately 4-fold increase in the odds of grade 2 or 3 toxicity.

Timing of radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery: outcome of 1393 patients at a single institution

BACKGROUND

The role of postoperative radiotherapy in breast-conserving therapy is undisputed. However, optimal timing of adjuvant radiotherapy is an issue of ongoing debate. This retrospective clinical cohort study was performed to investigate the impact of a delay in surgery-radiotherapy intervals on local control and overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from an unselected cohort of 1393 patients treated at a single institution over a 17-year period (1990-2006) were analyzed. Patients were assigned to two groups (CT+/CT-) according to chemotherapy status. A delay in the initiation of radiotherapy was defined as > 7 weeks (CT- group) and > 24 weeks (CT+ group).

RESULTS

The 10-year regional recurrence-free survival for the CT- and CT+ groups were 95.6 and 86.0 %, respectively. A significant increase in the median surgery-radiotherapy interval was observed over time (CT- patients: median of 5 weeks in 1990-1992 to a median of 6 weeks in 2005-2006; CT+ patients: median of 5 weeks in 1990-1992 to a median of 21 weeks in 2005-2006). There was no association between a delay in radiotherapy and an increased local recurrence rate (CT- group: p = 0.990 for intervals 0-6 weeks vs. ≥ 7 weeks; CT+ group: p = 0.644 for intervals 0-15 weeks vs. ≥ 24 weeks) or decreased overall survival (CT- group: p = 0.386 for intervals 0-6 weeks vs. ≥ 7 weeks; CT+ group: p = 0.305 for intervals 0-15 weeks vs. ≥ 24 weeks).

CONCLUSION

In the present cohort, a delay of radiotherapy was not associated with decreased local control or overall survival in the two groups (CT-/CT+). However, in the absence of randomized evidence, delays in the initiation of radiotherapy should be avoided.

Role of chemotherapy in breast cancer

Breast cancer represents a major health problem, with more than a million new cases and 370,000 deaths worldwide yearly. Options and understanding of how to use cytotoxic chemotherapy in both advanced and early stage breast cancer have made substantial progress in the past 10 years, with numerous landmark studies identifying clear survival benefits for newer approaches. Despite this research, the optimal approach for any individual patient cannot be determined from a literature review or decision-making algorithm alone. Treatment choices are still predominantly based on practice determined by individual or collective experience and the historic development of treatment within a locality. In many situations treatment decisions cannot be divorced from economic considerations. Blanket application of international, national or local guidelines is usually impractical or inappropriate and careful consideration of the detailed circumstances of each patient is required to make optimal use of available options. Recent research has allowed us to refine breast cancers further into prognostic groups based on a gene expression profile. Clinical trials to prove the value of this approach are currently being designed. This review discusses the evidence for various chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, and examines the current evidence for the timing of radiotherapy in the adjuvant setting.

Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

After surgery for localised breast cancer, radiotherapy (RT) improves both local control and breast cancer-specific survival. In patients at risk of harbouring micro-metastatic disease, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) improves 15-year survival. However, the best sequence of administering these two types of adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of different sequencing of adjuvant CT and RT for women with early breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

An updated search was carried out in the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's Specialised Register (20 May 2011), MEDLINE (14 December 2011), EMBASE (20 May 2011) and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (20 May 2011). Details of the search strategy and methods of coding for the Specialised Register are described in the Group's module in The Cochrane Library. We extracted studies that had been coded as 'early', 'chemotherapy' and 'radiotherapy'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials evaluating different sequencing of CT and RT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed the eligibility and quality of the identified studies and extracted data from the published reports of the included trials. We derived odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) from the available numerical data. Toxicity data were extracted, where reported. We used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis and conducted analyses on the basis of the method of sequencing of the two treatments.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials reporting two different sequencing comparisons were identified. There were no significant differences between the various methods of sequencing adjuvant therapy for local recurrence-free survival, overall survival, relapse-free survival and metastasis-free survival based on 1166 randomised women in three trials. Concurrent chemoradiation increased anaemia (OR 1.54; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 2.15), telangiectasia (OR 3.85; 95% CI 1.37 to 10.87) and pigmentation (OR 15.96; 95% CI 2.06 to 123.68). Treated women did not report worse cosmesis with concurrent chemoradiation but physician-reported assessments did (OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.42 to 3.07). Other measures of toxicity did not differ between the two types of sequencing. On the basis of one trial (244 women), RT before CT was associated with an increased risk of neutropenic sepsis (OR 2.96; 95% CI 1.26 to 6.98) compared with CT before RT, but other measures of toxicity did not differ.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The data included in this review, from three well-conducted randomised trials, suggest that different methods of sequencing CT and RT do not appear to have a major effect on recurrence or survival for women with breast cancer if RT is commenced within seven months after surgery.

The optimal sequence of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal time sequences for chemotherapy and radiation therapy after breast surgery for patients with breast cancer remains unknown. Most of published studies were done for early breast cancer patients. However, in Egypt advanced stages were the common presentation. This retrospective analysis aimed to assess the optimum sequence for our population.

METHODS

267 eligible patients planned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy [FAC] and radiotherapy. Majority of patients (87.6%) underwent modified radical mastectomy while, 12.4% had conservative surgery.We divided the patients into 3 groups according to the sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Sixty-seven patients (25.1%) received postoperative radiotherapy before chemotherapy [group A]. One hundred and fifty patients (56.2%) were treated in a sandwich scheme (group B), which means that 3 chemotherapy cycles were given prior to radiotherapy followed by 3 further chemotherapy cycles. A group of 50 patients (18.7%) was treated sequentially (group C), which means that radiotherapy was supplied after finishing the last chemotherapy cycle. Patients' characteristics are balanced between different groups.

RESULTS

Disease free survival was estimated at 2.5 years, and it was 83.5%, 82.3% and 80% for patient receiving radiation before chemotherapy [group A], sandwich [group B] and after finishing chemotherapy [group C] respectively (p > 0.5). Grade 2 pneumonitis, which necessitates treatment with steroid, was detected in 3.4% of our patients, while grade 2 radiation dermatitis was 17.6%. There are no clinical significant differences between different groups regarded pulmonary or skin toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Regarding disease free survival and treatment toxicities, in our study, we did not find any significant difference between the different radiotherapy and chemotherapy sequences.

Long-term results of a randomized trial on the sequencing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

A prospective, phase III randomized study was undertaken to compare the outcomes of 2 different radiotherapy and chemotherapy sequences in conservatively treated patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Between January 1997 and November 2002, 206 patients operated of quadrantectomy and axillary dissection for breast cancer, candidates to receive adjuvant CMF chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) were assigned to concurrent or sequential radiation treatment by using a balanced randomization method. Before randomization patients were stratified by tumor diameter, age, and lymph node status. The primary end point was the freedom from breast recurrence, and secondary end points were overall and disease-free survival. Overall outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

All 206 patients enrolled and randomized in the trial were analyzed. The median follow-up was 111 months, with no patient lost for follow-up. No difference in 10-years breast recurrence-free, disease-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival rates was observed in the 2 treatment sequence groups. The Hazard Ratios, calculated for each prognostic factor, showed no difference in all outcomes between the 2 treatment sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

No influence of the treatment sequence on long-term outcomes was observed in this trial. This finding suggests that to avoid an increased risk of distant recurrence or an excessive toxicity, radiation therapy may be delayed until after the end of the more, recently used, anthracycline-based chemotherapy without increasing the risk of breast recurrences, thus allowing the delivery of full-dose chemotherapy in patients at risk for systemic disease spread.

Concomitant adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy with anthracycline-based regimens in breast cancer: a single centre experience

PURPOSE

This study was done to evaluate the toxicity related to concurrent radiotherapy and anthracycline (AC)-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer and to investigate the impact of treatment interruptions and the feasibility of this uncommon therapeutic approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From September 2002 to December 2007, 60 patients were treated at our Centre. The mean age at presentation was 48.5 (range 38-64) years. All patients underwent conservative surgery, and radiotherapy to the entire breast (mean dose 50 Gy; range 46-52 Gy). AC-based regimens consisted of four cycles of AC (doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide) or four cycles of epirubicin (EPI) followed by four courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF).

RESULTS

Concomitant treatment caused acute skin G3 toxicity in 8.9% of patients and one case of G4 toxicity (1.7%). Concerning cardiac assessment, six of the 56 evaluable patients (10.7%) developed an asymptomatic decline of left ventricular ejection fraction >10% and <20% of the baseline value. Radiotherapy was temporarily stopped in 21.3% and chemotherapy in 57.1% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, concomitant chemotherapy did not emerge as a significant factor in radiotherapy interruption. Moreover, no severe cardiac events were recorded.

Optimal sequence of implied modalities in the adjuvant setting of breast cancer treatment: an update on issues to consider

The adjuvant setting of early breast cancer treatment is an evolving field where different modalities must be combined to improve outcomes; moreover, quality of life of breast cancer survivors emerges as a new important parameter to consider, thus implying a better understanding of toxicities of these modalities. We have conducted a review focusing on the latest literature of the past 3 years, trying to evaluate the existing data on the maximum acceptable delay of radiotherapy when given as sole adjuvant treatment after surgery and the optimal sequence of all these modalities with respect to each other. It becomes evident radiotherapy should be given as soon as possible and within a time frame of 6-20 weeks. Chemotherapy is given before radiotherapy and hormone therapy. However, radiotherapy should be started within 7 months after surgery in these cases. Hormone therapy with tamoxifen might be given safely concomitantly or sequentially with radiotherapy although solid data are still lacking. The concurrent administration of letrozole and radiotherapy seems to be safe, whereas data on trastuzumab can imply only that it is safe to use concurrently with radiotherapy. Randomized comparisons of hormone therapy and trastuzumab administration with radiotherapy need to be performed.

A phase II study of radiotherapy and concurrent paclitaxel chemotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for node-positive breast cancer

PURPOSE

Administering adjuvant chemotherapy before breast radiotherapy decreases the risk of systemic recurrence, but delays in radiotherapy could yield higher local failure. We assessed the feasibility and efficacy of placing radiotherapy earlier in the breast-conserving treatment course for lymph node-positive breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between June 2000 and December 2004, 44 women with node-positive Stage II and III breast cancer were entered into this trial. Breast-conserving surgery and 4 cycles of doxorubicin (60 mg/m(2))/cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)) were followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) delivered every 3 weeks. Radiotherapy was concurrent with the first 2 cycles of paclitaxel. The breast received 39.6 Gy in 22 fractions with a tumor bed boost of 14 Gy in 7 fractions. Regional lymphatics were included when indicated. Functional lung volume was assessed by use of the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide as a proxy. Breast cosmesis was evaluated with the Harvard criteria.

RESULTS

The 5-year actuarial rate of disease-free survival is 88%, and overall survival is 93%. There have been no local failures. Median follow-up is 75 months. No cases of radiation pneumonitis developed. There was no significant change in the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide either immediately after radiotherapy (p = 0.51) or with extended follow-up (p = 0.63). Volume of irradiated breast tissue correlated with acute cosmesis, and acute Grade 3 skin toxicity developed in 2 patients. Late cosmesis was not adversely affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent paclitaxel chemotherapy and radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery shortened total treatment time, provided excellent local control, and was well tolerated.

Anthracycline and concurrent radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study in a single institution

Background

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) after breast surgery was investigated by few authors and remains controversial, because of concerns of toxicity with taxanes/anthracyclines and radiation. This treatment is not standard and is more commonly used for locally advanced breast cancer. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the concomitant use of anthracycline with radiotherapy (RT).

Findings

Four hundred women having operable breast cancer, treated by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and RT in concomitant way between January 2001 and December 2003, were included in this retrospective cohort study. The study compares 2 adjuvant treatments using CCRT, the first with anthracycline (group A) and the second with CMF (group B). The CT treatment was repeated every 21 days for 6 courses and the total delivered dose of RT was 50 Gy, divided as 2 Gy daily fractions. Locoregional recurrence free (LRFS), event free (EFS), and overall survivals (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival events. Multivariate Cox-regression was used to evaluate the relationship between patient characteristics, treatment and survival.

In the 2 groups (A+B) (n = 400; 249 in group A and 151 in group B), the median follow-up period was 74.5 months. At 5 years, the isolated LRFS was significantly higher in group A compared to group B (98.7% vs 95.3%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.258; 95% CI, 0.067 to 0.997; log-rank P = .034). In addition, the use of anthracycline regimens was associated with a higher rate of 5 years EFS (80.4% vs 75.1%; HR = 0.665; 95% CI, 0.455 to 1.016; log-rank P = .057). The 5 years OS was 83.2% and 79.2% in the anthracycline and CMF groups, respectively (HR = 0.708; 95% CI, 0.455 to 1.128; log-rank P = .143). Multivariate analysis confirmed the positive effect of anthracycline regimens on LRFS (HR = 0.347; 95% CI, 0.114 to 1.053; log-rank P = .062), EFS (HR = 0.539; 95% CI, 0.344 to 0.846; P = 0.012), and OS (HR = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.401 to 0.991; P = .046). LRFS, EFS and OS were significantly higher in the anthracycline group where the patients (n = 288) received more than 1 cycle of concurrent CT (P = .038, P = .026 and P = .038, respectively). LRFS and EFS were significantly higher in the anthracycline group within the BCT subgroup (P = .049 and P = .04, respectively). There were more hematologic, and more grade 2/3/4 skin toxicity in the anthracycline group.

Conclusions

After mastectomy or BCT, the adjuvant treatment based on anthracycline and concurrent RT reduced breast cancer relapse rate, and significantly improved LRFS, EFS and OS in the patients receiving more than 1 cycle of concurrent CT. There were more hematologic and non hematologic toxicities in the anthracycline group.

Combining systemic therapies with radiation in breast cancer

Over the last years, significant survival benefits for breast cancer were derived from the use of postoperative systemic therapies and radiotherapy. Although these two modalities have been extensively used, the optimal strategies of their combining remain debatable. There have been few randomized studies addressing this issue and their results are generally inconclusive. This article reviews combining systemic therapies (chemotherapy, hormonotherapy and trastuzumab) with radiation in breast cancer patients. In clinical practice, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are most commonly used sequentially but this strategy is not based on level 1 evidence. Increased cardiotoxicity and skin reactions preclude the concomitant radiotherapy and anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Further investigations are warranted to determine the safety of taxane-based schedules used concomitantly with radiotherapy, particularly with regard to pneumotoxicity. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy with the use of selected schemes may be considered in patients with locally advanced cancer but this strategy still needs to be verified in large randomized studies. The optimal combination of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors with radiotherapy has also not been determined in randomized trials and the results of retrospective studies are inconsistent. Finally, the data on combining targeted therapies with radiation are still scarce and do not allow for meaningful conclusions.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy after breast surgery was largely studied but remains controversial. Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy is a valuable method for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer which is under ongoing research program in our hospital. We are evaluating the feasibility of the concomitant use of chemotherapy retrospectively.

METHODS

Two hundred forty four women having breast cancer were investigated in a retrospective study. All patients were either treated by radical surgery or breast conservative surgery. The study compares two adjuvant treatments associating concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In the first group (group A) the patients were treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy in concomitant way using anthracycline (n = 110). In the second group (group B) the patients were treated by chemotherapy and radiotherapy in concomitant way using CMF treatment (n = 134). Chemotherapy was administered in six cycles, one each 3 weeks. Radiotherapy delivered a radiation dose of 50 Gy on the whole breast (or on the external wall) and/or on the lymphatic region. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the rates of disease free survival, loco-regional recurrence-free survival and overall survival. The Pearson Khi2 test was used to analyse the homogeneity between the two groups. The log-rank test was used to evaluate the differences between the two groups A and B.

RESULTS

After 76.4 months median follow-up (65.3 months mean follow up), only one patient relapsed to loco-regional breast cancer when the treatment was based on anthracycline. However, 8 patients relapsed to loco-regional breast cancer when the treatment was based on CMF. In the anthracycline group, the disease free survival after 5 years, was 80.4% compared to 76.4% in the CMF group (Log-rank test: p = 0.136). The overall survival after 5 years was 82.5% and 81.1% in the anthracycline and CMF groups respectively (Log-rank test: p = 0.428). The loco-regional free survival at 5 years was equal to 98.6% in group A and 94% in group B (Log-rank test: p = 0,033). The rate of grade II and grade III anaemia was 13.9% and 6.7% in anthracycline group and CMF group respectively (Khi2-test: p = 0.009). The rate of grade II and grade III skin dermatitis toxicity was 4.5% in the group A and 0% in the group B (Khi2-test: p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

From the 5 years retrospective investigation we showed similar disease free survival and overall survival in the two concurrent chemo-radiotherapy treatments based on anthracycline and CMF. However in the loco-regional breast cancer the treatment based on anthracycline was significantly better than that of the treatment based on CMF. There was more haematological and skin dermatitis toxicity in the anthracycline group.

Sequencing chemotherapy and radiotherapy in locoregional advanced breast cancer patients after mastectomy - a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Combined chemo- and radiotherapy are established in breast cancer treatment. Chemotherapy is recommended prior to radiotherapy but decisive data on the optimal sequence are rare. This retrospective analysis aimed to assess the role of sequencing in patients after mastectomy because of advanced locoregional disease.

METHODS

A total of 212 eligible patients had a stage III breast cancer and had adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary dissection between 1996 and 2004. According to concerted multi-modality treatment strategies 86 patients were treated sequentially (chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy) (SEQgroup), 70 patients had a sandwich treatment (SW-group) and 56 patients had simultaneous chemoradiation (SIM-group) during that time period. Radiotherapy comprised the thoracic wall and/or regional lymph nodes. The total dose was 45-50.4 Gray. As simultaneous chemoradiation CMF was given in 95.4% of patients while in sequential or sandwich application in 86% and 87.1% of patients an anthracycline-based chemotherapy was given.

RESULTS

Concerning the parameters nodal involvement, lymphovascular invasion, extracapsular spread and extension of the irradiated region the three treatment groups were significantly imbalanced. The other parameters, e.g. age, pathological tumor stage, grading and receptor status were homogeneously distributed. Looking on those two groups with an equally effective chemotherapy (EC, FEC), the SEQ- and SW-group, the sole imbalance was the extension of LVI (57.1 vs. 25.6%, p < 0.0001).5-year overall- and disease free survival were 53.2%/56%, 38.1%/32% and 64.2%/50%, for the sequential, sandwich and simultaneous regime, respectively, which differed significantly in the univariate analysis (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, log-rank test). Also the 5-year locoregional or distant recurrence free survival showed no significant differences according to the sequence of chemo- and radiotherapy. In the multivariate analyses the sequence had no independent impact on overall survival (p = 0.2) or disease free survival (p = 0.4). The toxicity, whether acute nor late, showed no significant differences in the three groups. The grade III/IV acute side effects were 3.6%, 0% and 3.5% for the SIM-, SW- and SEQ-group. By tendency the SIM regime had more late side effects.

CONCLUSION

No clear advantage can be stated for any radio- and chemotherapy sequence in breast cancer therapy so far. This could be confirmed in our retrospective analysis in high-risk patients after mastectomy. The sequential approach is recommended according to current guidelines considering a lower toxicity.

Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for early breast cancer

BACKGROUND

After surgery for localised breast cancer, adjuvant radiotherapy improves both local control and breast cancer specific survival. In patients at risk of harbouring micro-metastatic disease, adjuvant chemotherapy improves 15-year survival. However, the best sequence of administering these two types of adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer is not clear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of different sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for women with early breast cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialized Register (10 March 2005). Details of the search strategy and methods of coding are described in the Group's module in The Cochrane Library. We extracted studies that had been coded as 'early', 'chemotherapy' and 'radiotherapy'.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials evaluating different sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We assessed the eligibility and quality of the identified studies and extracted data from the published reports of the included studies. We derived odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios from the available numerical data. Hazard ratios were extracted directly from text. Toxicity data were extracted, where reported. We used a fixed-effect model for meta-analysis and conducted analyses on the basis of the method of sequencing of the two treatments.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials reporting two different sequencing comparisons were identified. There were no significant differences between the various methods of sequencing adjuvant therapy for survival, distant metastases or local recurrence, based on 853 randomised patients in two trials. One of these two trials (647 women) provided data on toxicity. Haematological toxicity (OR 1.43, confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 2.03) and oesophageal toxicity (OR 1.44, CI 1.03 to 2.02) were significantly increased with concurrent therapy, and nausea and vomiting were significantly decreased (OR 0.70, CI 0.50 to 0.98). Other measures of toxicity did not differ between the two types of sequencing. On the basis of one trial (244 women), radiotherapy before chemotherapy was associated with a significantly increased risk of neutropenic sepsis (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.26 to 6.98) compared with chemotherapy before radiotherapy, but other measures of toxicity were not significantly different.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The data included in this review, from three well conducted randomised trials, suggest that different methods of sequencing chemotherapy and radiotherapy do not appear to have a major effect on survival or recurrence for women with breast cancer if radiation therapy is commenced within 7 months after surgery.

Delaying Radiotherapy for the Delivery of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Combined Modality Treatment of Early Breast Cancer: Is It Disadvantageous and Could Combined Treatment be the Answer?

Women with early stage breast cancer are increasingly being treated with both adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The optimal sequence of these two treatment modalities is yet to be defined. It remains controversial whether delaying radiotherapy in order to deliver chemotherapy compromises local disease control and survival. Consequently, clinical practice in the UK is divided, with a number of different combination schedules being used in an effort to bring forward the start of radiotherapy. In practice, however, any benefit in local control must be balanced against a potential increase in toxicity. A review of the current literature on the effect of radiotherapy delay is presented, together with data on the toxicity of combined chemo-radiotherapy schedules and recent data from clinical trials designed to determine the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer

Over the past five decades, radiotherapy (RT) has become an integral part in the combined modality management of breast cancer. Although its significant effect on local control has been long demonstrated, only recently has adjuvant RT been shown to have a significant effect on breast cancer mortality and overall survival. This article summarizes the adjuvant role of RT after mastectomy and lumpectomy, as well as the rationale and techniques for partial-breast irradiation.

Examining time intervals between diagnosis and treatment in the management of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine time intervals between diagnosis and treatment of limited stage small cell lung cancer (L-SCLC) and to evaluate its effect on clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 166 patients with L-SCLC referred to a regional cancer center between January 1991 and December 1999 were analyzed. The time intervals studied were defined as: interval A, first abnormal chest x-ray to pathologic diagnosis: interval B, diagnosis to first oncology consultation; interval C, oncology consultation to first day of thoracic radiotherapy (RT); interval D, oncology consultation to first day of chemotherapy; and interval E, first day of chemo to first day of RT. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations between the time intervals and thoracic relapse (TR) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was used to model associations between time and complete response (CR) rates.

RESULTS

The median time duration of intervals A to E were 20, 12, 63.5, 15, and 48 days, respectively. When time was analyzed as a continuous variable, no statistically significant association between the interval lengths and outcomes studied was observed. Dichotomizing each interval using the median value as cut-off revealed that interval A >20 days was significantly associated with improved CR (odds ratio = 3.573; P = 0.027) whereas interval B >12 days was associated with a trend toward lower CR (odds ratio = 0.348; P = 0.073).

CONCLUSIONS

Short median times from first abnormal chest x-ray to diagnosis and from diagnosis to oncology consultation indicate that L-SCLC patients were diagnosed and referred promptly in the community setting. OS and TR appeared independent of the time intervals analyzed. Individual variations in disease presentation and tumor biology may explain the observed associations between early pathologic diagnosis and inferior CR rates.

Délais et retards à la radiothérapie : réflexion à propos de trois types de tumeurs

In the following review of the literature, the reasons and consequences of a tendency to the increase of the delay between the diagnosis and the first irradiation session will be studied. The duration of the delay varies according to the protocol of treatment, which itself depends on the tumour. Moreover, all types of radiotherapy are concerned by the increase in delay. A retrospective study enables to determine for a given series of similar tumours and treatments the mean duration of delay and find the excessive duration. The increase of delay phenomenon exists in different countries. We know that before irradiation the tumour grows according to its biological characteristics and the TNM initial determination will no longer be true. On the other hand, effective treatments such as chemotherapy and hormone therapy are increasingly used alone, before or in combination with radiotherapy. Consequently, the classical timing of radiation therapy could be modified often delayed. It is difficult to consider that successive treatments are a real increase of delay and compare its results with previous data from radiotherapy alone. We will study its impact in three types of tumours, including tumours of head and neck, of the breast and prostate, which are the most widely reported. The consequences of prolonged delay are not easily evaluated: one of the more important parameters is the possible modification of the stage of tumour. This phenomenon is not restricted to the studied types of tumours. We will try to find possible ways of reducing abnormal delays before irradiation.

A phase III randomized study on the sequencing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the conservative management of early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

To compare two different timings of radiation treatment in patients with breast cancer who underwent conservative surgery and were candidates to receive adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 206 patients who had quadrantectomy and axillary dissection for breast cancer and were planned to receive adjuvant CMF chemotherapy were randomized to concurrent or sequential radiotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered only to the whole breast through tangential fields to a dose of 50 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks, followed by an electron boost of 10-15 Gy in 4-6 fractions to the tumor bed.

RESULTS

No differences in 5-year breast recurrence-free, metastasis-free, disease-free, and overall survival were observed in the two treatment groups. All patients completed the planned radiotherapy. No evidence of an increased risk of toxicity was observed between the two arms. No difference in radiotherapy and in the chemotherapy dose intensity was observed in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with negative surgical margins receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy can be delayed to up to 7 months. Concurrent administration of CMF chemotherapy and radiotherapy is safe and might be reserved for patients at high risk of local recurrence, such as those with positive surgical margins or larger tumor diameters.

Sequencing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer: updated results of a prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

The optimal integration of chemotherapy with radiation (RT) for patients with early-stage breast cancer remains uncertain. We present the long-term results of a prospective randomized trial to address this question.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred forty-four patients were randomly assigned after conservative breast surgery to receive 12 weeks of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and prednisone (CAMFP) before RT (CT-first) or after RT (RT-first). Median follow-up for surviving patients was 135 months.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the CT-first and RT-first arms in time to any event, distant metastasis, or death. Sites of first failure were also not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Among breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery, there is no advantage to giving RT before adjuvant chemotherapy. However, this study does not have enough statistical power to rule out a clinically important survival benefit for either sequence.

A population-based study of the impact of delaying radiotherapy after conservative surgery for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines have set a maximum waiting time to radiation therapy for breast cancer. We evaluated if delaying radiotherapy resulted in worse outcomes in a large cohort of women with node-negative breast cancer.

METHODS

We selected a random sample of cases among women diagnosed with localized breast cancer in five regions of Québec, Canada, between 1988 and 1994. Only women with pathologically (n = 926) or clinically (n = 136) negative axillary nodes, and stage 1 or 2 disease treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy were eligible. Information was obtained by chart review, queries to physicians and linkage with administrative databases. Outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards analysis. Median follow-up was 7.1 years (range: 0.9-11.8).

RESULTS

Median delay to radiotherapy was 12.4 weeks in those who received chemotherapy and 8.4 weeks in others. Overall survival at 7 years was 85.6%. Local relapse-free and distant disease-free survivals were 77.6 and 76.2%. There was no significant difference in survival according to delay to radiotherapy in crude or multivariate analysis adjusting for several prognostic factors, including systemic treatment. The risk of local failure conditional on survival in women who received radiotherapy more than 12 weeks after surgery was increased (hazard ratio: 1.75, 95% confidence interval: 1.00, 3.08, p-value = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

Although longer waiting time to radiotherapy may compromise local control, it does not influence survival at 7 years when other predictors of outcomes are taken into account. Well controlled studies are needed to confirm and better characterize this relationship.

Effect of Addition of Adjuvant Paclitaxel on Radiotherapy Delivery and Locoregional Control of Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9344

Purpose

We compared radiotherapy (RT) delivery and locoregional control in patients with node-positive breast cancer randomly assigned on Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9344 to receive adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) with patients assigned to receive AC followed by paclitaxel (AC+T).

Methods

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant AC versus AC+T chemotherapy. RT was required if breast-conserving surgery was performed but was elective after mastectomy. Information about RT delivery was retrospectively collected. Cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR), use of elective RT, and RT delivery were compared between treatment arms.

Results

For patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and RT, the 5-year cumulative incidence of isolated LRR was 9.7% in the AC arm and 3.7% in the AC+T arm (P = .04) and of LRR as any component of failure was 12.9% versus 6.1%, respectively (P = .04). Although LRR rates in patients who did not receive postmastectomy RT were lower in the AC+T arm, the difference was not statistically significant. Despite the lack of protocol guidelines, RT use did not differ between arms, nor did RT dose, treatment interruption, or completion.

Conclusion

Despite the delay to RT during additional chemotherapy, adjuvant AC+T afforded better local control than AC alone in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Addition of paclitaxel did not adversely affect delivery or ability to tolerate RT, as indicated by similar rates of completion of timely, full-dose RT between arms.

Irradiation et chimiothérapie concomitante après chirurgie pour cancer du sein

In breast cancer, radiation therapy improves local control rate and survival. When chemotherapy and radiation are indicated the sequencing of the two treatments is still controversial. Several studies have suggested that adjuvant radiotherapy could be safely delayed until adjuvant chemotherapy was completed. Other studies, most of them retrospective, pointed out that a delay in the initiation of radiotherapy to give chemotherapy first, will result in a increased rate of local recurrence. Concomitant administration of the two treatments is an alternative. Pilot studies have suggested the feasibility of simultaneous administration using selected regimen as CMF or FNC. A randomized phase III trials has been conducted to compare sequential treatment with chemotherapy first and radiation versus concomitant treatments. Preliminary results of this study are presented.

Breast Cancer in Elderly Women: is Partial Breast Irradiation a Good Alternative?

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of all breast cancer occurs after age 65. Several aspects for the treatment of early breast cancer may be influenced by patient age, including postoperative radiation therapy (RT), in order to prevent the risk of local recurrence (LR). Postoperative adjuvant RT, improving the chances of local control, is not always completed because of comorbidity-associated factors. Does an alternative exist between a 5-week radiotherapy regime and no irradiation after breast conservative surgery without burdening the overall therapeutic management?

METHODS

The authors review the literature regarding age-specific issues in the irradiation of breast cancer and the potential role of a partial breast irradiation (PBI) to prevent LR in the ipsilateral breast.

RESULTS

Phase II and III trials have been analyzed for feasibility, efficacy and toxicity. PBI may be delivered with low or high dose rate brachytherapy and intra operative, or external beam radiation therapy. PBI satisfies the control quality criteria. The majority of the teams provide PBI recurrence rates lower than 5% (0-4.4%) with a median follow-up varying between 8 and 72 months, associated with cosmetic results comparable to those achieved with conventional external beam.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer in elderly women represents a medical and economical problem. The recommended conservative treatment includes RT for 50 Gy over 5 weeks. Some subgroups of patients did not receive radiotherapy because of comorbidity-associated factors or more favorable tumor biology. PBI seems to be an acceptable alternative to adjuvant RT over 5 weeks and no irradiation. The evaluation of toxicity and efficacy, especially in terms of local control, is necessary and large multicentric phase III trials comparing the two irradiation approaches are needed, including quality of life, economic considerations and longer follow-up.

[Partial irradiation of the breast: why, how?]

Radiation therapy represents a very important part of breast conservative treatment. The classic schedule consists in delivering a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions on 5 weeks, sometimes associated with a 10 to 16 Gy boost. For elderly women with difficulties to move or for younger women having professional activity or with young children in charge, a 5 to 6 weeks radiation therapy with long and frequent transportations is sometimes difficult to achieve. The aim of partial breast irradiation (PBI) is to prevent, in a short period (5 to 8 days) and less transportations, the risk of local recurrence into the tumor bed. Different techniques have been described, using either interstitial brachytherapy (low or high dose rate) or intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT photons or electrons) or external beam radiation therapy. Phase II PBI trials using interstitial brachytherapy showed a local control rate of 0 to 4% with a follow-up of 20 to 75 months. The rate of good/excellent cosmetic results is 67 to 100%. Results analysis of trials using very new PBI techniques (MammoSite), IORT) remains more difficult. If phase III randomized trials could confirm that PBI achieved, for selected patients, local controls equivalent to those obtain with whole breast irradiation, PBI could improve quality of life during radiation therapy, and maybe contribute to have a cost effective breast cancer conservative treatment.

Integration of systemic therapy and radiation therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with conservative surgery

There is no consensus on the optimal combination of systemic therapy and radiation therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with conservative surgery. This article reviews prospective and retrospective studies that shed light on this topic. Patients with positive, close, or unknown microscopic margins appear to benefit from relatively early initiation of radiation therapy, whereas those with wider tumor-free margin widths do not. For patients at high risk of distant failure (such as those with = 4 positive axillary nodes), chemotherapy may be more effective when it begins before radiation therapy rather than after. Regimens of concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy tend to have higher acute and subacute complication rates than sequential regimens, but the actual rates vary substantially with the exact details of the overall treatment program. There are no data on the impact of the timing of tamoxifen administration on the effectiveness of radiation therapy. Tamoxifen does not appear to increase complication rates relative to the use of radiation therapy alone. Thus, the best way of giving combined-modality therapy is uncertain. Further retrospective and prospective studies to investigate the issues discussed herein should be performed.

Does delay in starting treatment affect the outcomes of radiotherapy? A systematic review

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to synthesize what is known about the relationship between delay in radiotherapy (RT) and the outcomes of RT.

METHODS

A systematic review of the world literature was conducted to identify studies that described the association between delay in RT and the probability of local control, metastasis, and/or survival. Studies were classified by clinical and methodologic criteria and their results were combined using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 46 relevant studies involving 15,782 patients met our minimum methodologic criteria of validity; most (42) were retrospective observational studies. Thirty-nine studies described rates of local recurrence, 21 studies described rates of distant metastasis, and 19 studies described survival. The relationship between delay and the outcomes of RT had been studied in diverse situations, but most frequently in breast cancer (21 studies) and head and neck cancer (12 studies). Combined analysis showed that the 5-year local recurrence rate (LRR) was significantly higher in patients treated with adjuvant RT for breast cancer more than 8 weeks after surgery than in those treated within 8 weeks of surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 2.16). Combined analysis also showed that the LRR was significantly higher among patients who received postoperative RT for head and neck cancer more than 6 weeks after surgery than among those treated within 6 weeks of surgery (OR = 2.89; 95% CI, 1.60 to 5.21). There was little evidence about the impact of delay in RT on the risk of metastases or the probability of long-term survival in any situation.

CONCLUSION

Delay in the initiation of RT is associated with an increase [corrected] in LRR in breast cancer and head and neck cancer. Delays in starting RT should be as short as reasonably achievable.

Concurrent cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and radiotherapy for breast carcinoma: a well tolerated adjuvant regimen

BACKGROUND

The current study was conducted to assess the toxicity of concurrent adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) for early breast carcinoma.

METHODS

In the current study, the authors reviewed the records of 680 consecutive breast carcinoma patients who received adjuvant CMF at the Princess Margaret Hospital between 1980-1990. Surgery was comprised of mastectomy in 64% of patients, breast conservation in 35% of patients, and was unknown in 1% of patients. Two hundred two patients received concurrent CMF/RT that was defined as an overlap in CMF and RT administration of at least 21 days. Forty-seven patients received sequential CMF/RT (defined as no overlap or an overlap of < 7 days in CMF and RT administration). Other patients received CMF alone. Adverse effects of RT were graded retrospectively using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) system. Reasons for interruption or failure to complete RT were recorded. The magnitude of chemotherapy dose reductions and delays also were noted.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 44 years (range, 26-68 years) and 88% of the patients had lymph node-positive disease. RT was interrupted or discontinued due to side effects in 4% of patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.7-7.7%) and 0% (95% CI, 0-7.6%), respectively, of the concurrent and sequential groups (P = 0.36). The incidence of Grade 3 or Grade 4 RT toxicity was 1.5% (95% CI, 0.3-4.3%) and 2.1% (95% CI, 0.1-11.3%), respectively, for the concurrent and sequential groups (P = 0.57). The median relative dose intensity of chemotherapy for patients receiving concurrent CMF/RT, sequential CMF/RT, and CMF alone was 0.87, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively (P = 0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study demonstrate that the concurrent administration of CMF and RT is associated with a low risk of serious toxicity and is an acceptable adjuvant regimen for patients with breast carcinoma.

Delay in adjuvant radiation treatment and outcomes of breast cancer--a review

Recent meta-analyses have shown the importance of locoregional control as a long-term determinant of breast cancer survival. Whether factors related to the delivery of radiotherapy, such as delay, dose, fractionation or irradiated volume, are associated with outcome remains unclear. We performed a critical review of the literature on delay to radiation using a computerized search of papers published between 1985 and 2000. Periods of accrual, details of radiotherapy, surgical and systemic treatment, and information on prognostic factors were noted. Studies on sequencing of adjuvant therapy were compared to studies on delay to radiation, classified according to whether or not patients also received chemotherapy. Comparisons of patients receiving systemic therapy to individuals spared this option were considered uninformative since the impact of delaying radiation is then highly confounded by systemic treatment received. The single published experimental study on sequencing suggests that delay to radiation may compromise local control, and this is consistent with a few retrospective reports on delay to radiotherapy among patients receiving chemotherapy. However, indirect evidence from two randomized clinical trials of chemotherapy, and the majority of observational studies on delay to radiotherapy, suggest that it has no impact on either local, distant control or survival. Factors, methodological, and others, that could explain these inconsistencies are discussed. No study restricted to patients at low risk of recurrence suggested an impact of delaying radiation. Short chemotherapy regimens are likely to represent a safe option with respect to outcome of radiation treatment.

Predictors for pneumonitis during locoregional radiotherapy in high-risk patients with breast carcinoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue

BACKGROUND

To study the predictive value of serial pulmonary function testing (PFT) for toxicity in patients who have received high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and stem-cell rescue for breast carcinoma. These patients are at risk of developing therapy-related pneumonitis (TRP) during or after radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients who received induction chemotherapy (CT) and consolidation HDCT (cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, carmustine) underwent serial PFTs before induction CT, after HDCT, and before locoregional RT. The rate of TRP, i.e., pulmonary complications of Grade 2 or higher (World Health Organization classification), was studied during and 2 months after RT. We analyzed the time-course of changes in the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) and forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV(1)) and studied the differences between patients who developed TRP and those who did not.

RESULTS

The incidence of TRP was 46%. There were marked reductions in DLCO and FEV(1) at the time of RT compared with baseline (Wilcoxon signed rank test: P < 0.001). However, pre-RT PFT values did not predict subsequent development of TRP. Instead, the ratio of pre-RT DLCO to the minimum post- HDCT DLCO, i.e., trend of improvement, predicted the development of TRP in patients (logistic regression analysis: P = 0.048). At a cutoff level of 1, the positive and negative predictive values for this ratio were 61% and 87%, respectively. There was an association between this ratio and a longer interval between HDCT and RT (Spearman rank correlation: P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the directional trend of DLCO after HDCT, i.e., no recovery from nadir values, is a predictor for TRP. TRP patients have a shorter median interval between HDCT and RT than asymptomatic patients. To minimize the occurrence of TRP, one should consider either delaying RT beyond 2 months following carmustine-based HDCT to allow the PFTs to partly recover, or confirm apositive directional trend for improvement of DLCO at the start of RT compared to the post-HDCT nadir value.

Timing of radiotherapy in breast cancer conserving treatment

The optimal timing and sequencing of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for early invasive breast cancer is controversial. Several studies demonstrated that postoperative radiation therapy significantly reduces the incidence of breast recurrences. For patients who do not need systemic treatment, the interval between surgery and the start of radiotherapy should not exceed eight weeks. For node-positive and high-risk patients receiving breast-conserving treatment, adjuvant chemotherapy should be administered prior to radiotherapy, but the delay of radiation should not exceed 20-24 weeks. Side effects and complications of radiotherapy can be expected to increase when chemotherapy is administered concurrently. In particular, antracycline-based chemotherapy regimens increase the damage to heart muscle and coronary arteries: to avoid the risk of ischemic cardiovascular disease, radiotherapy must be performed after the end of systemic treatment.

Feasibility of breast preservation in the treatment of occult primary carcinoma presenting with axillary metastases

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to compare the treatment outcomes in patients with occult primary carcinoma with axillary lymph node metastasis who were treated with mastectomy or with intent to preserve the breast.

METHODS

From 1951 to 1998, 479 female patients were registered with axillary lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary. After clinical workup, including mammography, 45 patients retained this diagnosis and received treatment for T0 N1-2 M0 carcinoma of the breast. Clinical and pathological data were collected retrospectively, and survival was calculated from the date of initial diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up time was 7 years.

RESULTS

Median age was 54 years (range, 32-79). Clinical nodal status was N1 in 71% and N2 in 29% of the patients. Surgical treatment was mastectomy in 29% and an intent to preserve the breast in 71% of the patients. Locoregional radiotherapy was used in 71% and systemic chemoendocrine therapy was used in 73% of the patients. Of the 13 mastectomy patients, only one had a primary tumor discovered in the specimen. Two patients (4%) were ultimately diagnosed with lung cancer and neuroendocrine tumor. No significant difference was detected between mastectomy and breast preservation in locoregional recurrence (15% versus 13%), distant metastases (31% versus 22%), or 5-year survival (75% vs. 79%). Regardless of surgical therapy, the most important determinant of survival was the number of positive nodes. Five-year overall survival was 87% with 1-3 positive nodes compared with 42% with > or =4 positive nodes (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Occult primary carcinoma with axillary metastases can be treated with preservation of the breast without a negative impact on local control or survival.

Concurrent CMF and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer: results of a pilot study

PURPOSE

The optimal sequencing of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy is unresolved. Given the concerns arising from delaying either CT or RT, we conducted a pilot study of a concurrent CT-RT regimen in the hope that this would reduce side effects without decreasing efficacy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1992-1994, 112 patients with 0-3 positive nodes received 6 monthly cycles of classic oral chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (CMF). On day 15 of cycle 1, patients started tangential field RT (39.6 Gy in 22 fractions), followed by a 16 Gy boost in 8 fractions. Median follow-up time for surviving patients was 53 months.

RESULTS

Moist desquamation developed during or shortly after RT in 50% of patients, but only 5 patients required treatment breaks. Grade 4 neutropenia during RT occurred in 16 patients, but only 1 required hospitalization. One patient developed Grade 2 radiation pneumonitis. Ninety-three percent of patients received at least 85% of prescribed drug doses. Cosmetic scores of 51 evaluable patients approximately 2 years after the end of chemotherapy were 47% excellent, 43% good, and 10% fair. We have observed 4 local failures and 20 distant failures.

CONCLUSIONS

This concurrent CT-RT scheme had acceptable toxicity and outcome. Further comparison of this approach allowing prompt initiation of both CT and RT to alternative sequences is warranted.

Autologous stem-cell transplant after conventional dose adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer: impact on the delivery of local-regional radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation is used increasingly in the treatment of poor-prognosis primary breast cancer. Because these patients may be cured with standard multimodality therapy, it is important to address both the efficacy of transplantation, and its effect on the delivery of standard treatments including local radiation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with high risk primary breast cancer were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa and stem-cell transplant following surgery and conventional-dose adjuvant chemotherapy. Outcome, including sites of failure and delivery of local radiation therapy, was assessed for 103 patients.

RESULTS

Overall and disease-free survival rates at 18 months were 83% (+/- 4%) and 77% (+/- 4%) respectively. Twenty patients (19.4%) received radiation therapy prior to transplant. Of the remaining 83, 77 received radiation therapy after transplant. Overall, 5 (19.2%) of 26 first sites of recurrence were local alone. For patients receiving radiation prior to transplant, 3 of 7 (43%, 95% CI: 6%-80%) sites of first recurrence were local, while 2 of 19 (10.5%, 95% CI: 0%-24.5%) sites of first recurrence were local alone in patients receiving post-transplant radiation or no radiation.

CONCLUSION

Transplantation does not appear to significantly compromise the delivery or outcome of local radiation therapy for primary breast cancer.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy: future directions

With careful interpretation of existing studies of postmastectomy radiotherapy, much has been learned about the ability of radiotherapy to significantly reduce local failure and potentially impact on survival. With this knowledge, however, has come additional questions about the mechanisms by which radiotherapy could affect systemic control and the extent of that benefit. Therefore, these questions need to be investigated in well-designed, randomized trials that incorporate aggressive surgical techniques and contemporary chemotherapy regimens into the clinical plan. A trial that is currently in progress should give additional insight into whether regional irradiation in the modern era, which incorporates the internal mammary nodes in the radiotherapy field, impacts systemic control. An upcoming trial will investigate whether women at moderate risk for locoregional failure will benefit from comprehensive radiotherapy after aggressive surgery and chemotherapy. And, although no national studies are currently planned to test the optimal sequencing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, consideration should be given to studying this issue in large, randomized trials.

[Respective roles of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in adjuvant treatment of cancer of the breast: theoretical importance and feasibility of chemoradiotherapy]

Concomitant radiochemotherapy is of potential interest in the treatment of early stage breast cancer. Radiotherapy improves local control after both conservative surgery and mastectomy and in this last case also improves overall survival. Some questions however still exist concerning the role of the delay between surgery and radiotherapy on the efficacy of this treatment. Over 6 months, the benefit due to radiotherapy could be reduced. Adjuvant chemotherapy leads to improved survival in all categories of patients with breast cancer, either with or without axillary-node involvement. Anthracyclin-containing regimens seem to be the most efficient, but their superiority on "historical" standard regimens such as cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil has never been fully established. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have synergistic effects. Used simultaneously, their effect on residual disease after surgery could be increased. Moreover, this therapeutic modality enables reduction of treatment duration as well as the delay between surgery and radiotherapy. Some studies have demonstrated the good tolerance of concomitant radiotherapy and FNC (5-fluoro-uracil, mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide) or CMF. Three French randomized trials testing the value of concomitant vs sequential radiotherapy + chemotherapy are ongoing. However, careful and critical interpretation of survival data will be required to consider concomitant chemoradiotherapy as a standard adjuvant treatment of early stage breast cancer.