Prostate-specific antigen following prostate radiotherapy: how low can you go?

Combining radiation therapy with interstitial radiation-inducible TNF-α expression for locoregional cancer treatment

Brachytherapy (BRT) is used in the treatment of human cancers, including the cervix, breast, prostate and head and neck cancers. The primary advantage of BRT lies in the spatial conformation of the radiation deposition. Previously, we have shown that similar techniques (using hollow metallic cylinders) may be used to deliver gene-therapy vectors capable of expressing the radiation-sensitizing cytokine, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, within a restricted volume of tissue. Herein, we report radiation sensitization of cancer cells using a TNF-α expressing vector driven by the radiation-inducible immediate-early gene-1 (IEX-1) promoter (pIEX-TNF-α). TNF-α, determined by ELISA assays using culture medium, increased between 5 and 10 fold, 48 h following exposure to radiation, and radiation sensitization was comparable with that observed in cells in which TNF-α was constitutively expressed under cytomegalo viral (CMV) promoter using the plasmid vector (pCMV-TNF-α). This efficiency of induced TNF-α radiation sensitization was also observed in cervix (SW756) and prostate tumor (PC-3) xenograft models. IEX-1-driven TNF-α expression following external radiation exposure resulted in enhanced regression of tumor xenografts as compared with radiation alone. A feasibility of using radioactive Pd-103 seeds with GeneSeeds was further examined using PC-3 xenograft models. The data showed substantial tumor growth suppression following co-implantation with a metal seed containing Pd-103. Taken together, these results show the enhanced effect on tumor regression by treatment with radiation-inducible TNF-α expression in combination with radiation and support for the IEX-1 promoter as a useful regulator for temporal activation of radiation-sensitizing gene expression.

PSA nadir predicts biochemical and distant failures after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a multi-institutional analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the significance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir (nPSA) and the time to nPSA (T(nPSA)) in predicting biochemical or clinical disease-free survival (PSA-DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients treated with definitive external beam radiotherapy (RT) for clinical Stage T1b-T2 prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nine participating institutions submitted data on 4839 patients treated between 1986 and 1995 for Stage T1b-T2cN0-NxM0 prostate cancer. All patients were treated definitively with RT alone to doses > or =60 Gy, without neoadjuvant or planned adjuvant androgen suppression. A total of 4833 patients with a median follow-up of 6.3 years met the criteria for analysis. Two endpoints were considered: (1) PSA-DFS, defined as freedom from PSA failure (American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition), initiation of androgen suppression after completion of RT, or documented local or distant failure; and (2) DMFS, defined as freedom from clinically apparent distant failure. In patients with failure, nPSA was defined as the lowest PSA measurement before any failure. In patients without failure, nPSA was the lowest PSA measurement during the entire follow-up period. T(nPSA) was calculated from the completion of RT to the nPSA date.

RESULTS

A greater nPSA level and shorter T(nPSA) were associated with decreased PSA-DFS and DMFS in all patients and in all risk categories (low [Stage T1b, T1c, or T2a, Gleason score < or =6, and PSA level < or =10 ng/mL], intermediate [Stage T1b, T1c, or T2a, Gleason score < or =6, and PSA level >10 but < or =20 ng/mL, or Stage T2b or T2c, Gleason score < or =6, and PSA level < or =20 ng/mL, or Gleason score 7 and PSA level < or =20 ng/mL], and high [Gleason score 8-10 or PSA level >20 ng/mL]), regardless of RT dose. The 8-year PSA-DFS and DMFS rate for patients with nPSA <0.5 ng/mL was 75% and 97%; nPSA > or =0.5 but <1.0 ng/mL, 52% and 96%; nPSA > or =1.0 but <2.0 ng/mL, 40% and 91%; and nPSA > or =2.0 ng/mL, 17% and 73%, respectively. The 8-year PSA-DFS and DMFS rate for patients with T(nPSA) <6 months was 27% and 66%; T(nPSA) > or =6 but <12 months, 31% and 85%; T(nPSA) > or =12 but <24 months, 42% and 94%; and T(nPSA) > or =24 months, 75% and 99%, respectively. A shorter T(nPSA) was associated with decreased PSA-DFS and DMFS, regardless of the nPSA. Both nPSA and T(nPSA) were significant predictors of PSA-DFS and DMFS in multivariate models incorporating clinical stage, Gleason score, initial PSA level, and RT dose. The significance of nPSA and T(nPSA) was supported by landmark analysis, as well as by analysis of nPSA and T(nPSA) as time-dependent covariates. A dose > or =70 Gy was associated with a lower nPSA level and longer T(nPSA) in all risk categories, and a greater dose was significantly associated with greater PSA-DFS and DMFS in multivariate analysis. Regression analysis confirmed that higher clinical stage, Gleason score, and initial PSA were associated with a greater nPSA level.

CONCLUSION

The results of this large, multi-institutional analysis of 4833 patients have provided important evidence that nPSA and T(nPSA) after definitive external beam RT are not only predictive of a predominantly PSA endpoint (PSA-DFS), but are also predictive of distant metastasis in all clinical risk categories. Greater RT doses were associated with lower nPSA, longer T(nPSA), and improved PSA-DFS and DMFS.

Modifying the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition of biochemical failure to minimize the influence of backdating in patients with prostate cancer treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy alone

PURPOSE

Adoption of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus definition has been critical for evaluating and comparing outcome following treatment with radiation. However, since its almost universal adoption, several points have remained controversial, notably backdating the date of failure to the point midway between the posttreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir and the first increase. We evaluated the impact of backdating on no biochemical evidence of disease (bNED) control and suggest changes in the definition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 1, 1989 and November 30, 1998, 1,017 patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy alone. bNED control was defined using the ASTRO consensus definition. bNED failure was calculated from the time midway between the posttreatment PSA nadir and the first of the 3 consecutive increases in PSA (date of failure A). Four alternate failure time points were chosen, including backdating to the date of the first increase in PSA after the nadir, the date between the first and second consecutive PSA increases, the date between the second and third consecutive PSA increases, and the date of the third increase in PSA after the nadir (dates of failure 1 to 4). Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for all definitions of failure as well as hazard functions with time. Subset analyses based on prognostic group and followup time were also performed.

RESULTS

The 10-year Kaplan-Meier bNED control rates were 64%, 52%, 47%, 42% and 39% using dates of failure A and 1 to 4, respectively. These differences persisted when patients were stratified by prognostic group. These same differences in bNED control were observed for the long-term followup subset, in which 10-year bNED control rates were 48%, 47%, 44%, 41% and 39% using dates of failure A and 1 to 4, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adoption of the ASTRO consensus definition has been crucial for evaluating outcome in the radiation oncology community. However, the date of failure should be moved from the current point to one closer to the point at which failure is declared. Additional analysis with large numbers of patients from multiple institutions is necessary to determine the point.

The correlation of serial prostate specific antigen measurements with clinical outcome after external beam radiation therapy of patients for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The authors analyzed retrospectively their institution's experience in treating patients with localized prostate carcinoma with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to determine the correlation of various biochemical failure (BF) definitions with clinical failure and cause specific survival (CSS).

METHODS

Between January 1987 and December 1997, 1,094 patients with clinical T1-T3N0M0 prostate carcinoma were treated with definitive EBRT alone at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. All patients received EBRT alone (no adjuvant hormones) to a median total prostate dose of 66.6 grays (Gy) (range, 59.4-70.4 Gy). Multiple BF definitions were tested for their correlation with clinical failure and cause specific death (CSD = 1-CSS). All BF definitions were tested for sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of predicting subsequent clinical failure and CSD. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated in the form of 10-year actuarial clinical failure and CSD rates. Analyses were performed on all 1,094 patients as well as for those 727 patients who had at least 5 post-RT prostate specific antigen (PSA) level measurements and who did not receive hormonal therapy for post-RT PSA elevations. The median PSA follow-up was 4.0 years for the entire population and 4.5 years for those 727 patients included in the second analysis.

RESULTS

In the entire population, 167 patients (15%) experienced clinical failure corresponding to 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of 16% and 34%, respectively. The correlation of various BF definitions with outcome was calculated in those 727 patients who did not receive hormonal therapy. For these patients, BF (as defined by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel) yielded a 73% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and 75% overall accuracy for predicting clinical failure and a 74% sensitivity, 69% specificity, and 69% overall accuracy for predicting CSD. The 10-year clinical failure rate for those 251 patients demonstrating 3 consecutive PSA rises (BF) was 64% versus 14% for those patients who did not meet these criteria (biochemically controlled [BC]). As expected, definitions requiring only two rises were more sensitive but less specific in predicting clinical failure than those definitions requiring three or four rises. Because there were dramatically more clinically controlled patients (85%) than clinical failures (15%), the overall accuracy for each definition more closely approximated its specificity. The definitions classifying BF as a postnadir increase of > or = 3 or > or = 4 ng/mL above the nadir yielded the highest accuracies of 87% and 88%, respectively. In addition, these definitions also appeared to provide the greatest separation in clinical failure rates between BC and BF patients, an absolute difference of 77% and 76%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The correlation between BF and clinical failure and CSD varies markedly depending on the BF definition used. Definitions incorporating a fixed baseline (the nadir level) and the postnadir PSA profile may have better correlation with clinical failure than definitions using the nadir only or a specific number of consecutive rises in which a variable baseline "resets" after a PSA decrease.

Statistical models for longitudinal biomarkers of disease onset

We consider the analysis of serial biomarkers to screen and monitor individuals in a given population for onset of a specific disease of interest. The biomarker readings are subject to error. We survey some of the existing literature and concentrate on two recently proposed models. The first is a fully Bayesian hierarchical structure for a mixed effects segmented regression model. Posterior estimates of the changepoint (onset time) distribution are obtained by Gibbs sampling. The second is a hidden changepoint model in which the onset time distribution is estimated by maximum likelihood using the EM algorithm. Both methods lead to a dynamic index that represents a strength of evidence that onset has occurred by the current time in an individual subject. The methods are applied to some large data sets concerning prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a serial marker for prostate cancer. Rules based on the indices are compared to standard diagnostic criteria through the use of ROC curves adapted for longitudinal data.

Post-treatment PSA < or = 0.2 ng/mL defines disease freedom after radiotherapy for prostate cancer using modern techniques

OBJECTIVES

The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) definition of disease freedom after radiotherapy for prostate cancer is still in dispute. This report focuses on the PSA nadir achieved in men treated by modern radiotherapy techniques.

METHODS

From 1984 to 1994, 489 consecutive men with clinical Stage T1 -T2 prostate cancer were treated by simultaneous radiation: prostate iodine-125 implant followed by external beam radiation. A transperineal implant was performed on 143 men with Stage T1-T2NX, the focus of this study; 346 men with Stage T1-T2N0 had a retropubic implant. The median pretreatment PSA was 8.3 ng/mL (range 0.3 to 188). A rising PSA was defined as one that rose on three consecutive occasions above whatever nadir was achieved. A minimum 5-year follow-up (range 5 to 15) was reached by 453 men.

RESULTS

After a minimum 5-year follow-up, 336 men had a nonrising PSA, and of this group, 107 had undergone simultaneous radiation by the transperineal implant technique. A PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL or less was achieved by 97% of the transperineally implanted men, and 3% had a nadir of 0.3 to 1.0 ng/mL. Of the 489 men, those who had a nadir of 0.2 ng/mL or less had a 92% nonrising PSA rate (P = 0.001) 10 years after treatment compared with a 41% rate for men who had a nadir of 0.3 to 1.0 ng/mL. All men whose nadir was greater than 1.0 ng/mL had recurrence. The median time to achieve the PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL was 27 months (range 3 to 102).

CONCLUSIONS

Primarily on the basis of the results from men treated with simultaneous radiation using the transperineal technique, the definition of disease freedom for radiotherapy should be men who achieve and maintain a PSA nadir of 0.2 ng/mL or less.

Defining biochemical cure for prostate carcinoma patients treated with external beam radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

The authors retrospectively reviewed their institution's long term experience with conventional external beam radiation therapy (RT) for localized prostate carcinoma to identify criteria associated with long term biochemical cure.

METHODS

Between January 1987 and December 1994, 871 patients were treated with external beam RT alone for clinically localized prostate carcinoma at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. All patients received only external beam RT to a median total dose of 66.6 grays (Gy) (range, 59.4-70.4 Gy). No patient received hormonal therapy unless treatment failure was documented. The median follow-up was 5.0 years (range, 0. 2-11.8 years). Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel definition.

RESULTS

In the entire study group, 380 patients experienced biochemical failure at a median interval of 1.5 years after the completion of RT. The 5-year and 7-year actuarial rates of biochemical control were 50% and 48%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a higher pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, higher Gleason score, higher clinical T classification, higher nadir level, and shorter time interval to nadir all were associated significantly with biochemical failure (P < 0.001). The median intervals to biochemical failure for patients with pretreatment PSA levels </= 3.9 ng/mL, 4.0-19.9 ng/mL, and >/= 20.0 ng/mL were 2.2 years, 1.5 years, and 1.2 years, respectively (P < 0. 001). The median intervals to biochemical failure for patients with Gleason scores of 2-4, 5-7, and 8-10 were 1.8 years, 1.5 years, and 1.1 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Only 6 patients failed beyond 5 years after treatment even though 136 patients were at risk for failure beyond this point. When restricting analysis to 643 patients (74%) with >/= 3 years of PSA follow-up, the median nadir level for biochemically controlled patients was 0.6 ng/mL and occurred at a median interval of 1.9 years after RT versus a median nadir level of 1.3 ng/mL (P = 0.002) occurring at a median interval of 1.0 years (P < 0.001) in those patients who experienced biochemical failure. Patients were divided into subgroups based on their PSA nadir level and time to nadir. The 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates for patients with nadir values of </= 0.4 ng/mL, 0.5-0.9 ng/mL, 1. 0-1.9 ng/mL, 2.0-3.9 ng/mL, and >/= 4.0 ng/mL were 78%, 60%, 50%, 20%, and 9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-year actuarial biochemical control rates for patients who reached their nadir at < 1.0 years, 1.0-1.9 years, 2.0-2.9 years, and >/= 3.0 years were 30%, 52%, 64%, and 92%, respectively (P < 0.001). All 52 patients who achieved a nadir of </= 0.4 ng/mL and required >/= 2.0 years to reach this nadir had biochemically controlled disease.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that a patient has a high likelihood of biochemical cure after treatment for prostate carcinoma with conventional doses of external beam RT if he has not demonstrated biochemical failure within 5 years of treatment. Patients with lower pretreatment PSA levels and lower Gleason scores may require longer follow-up than those with less favorable characteristics to achieve the same certainty of cure. Patients who achieve a PSA nadir </= 0.4 ng/mL and require >/= 2.0 years to reach this nadir have the highest probability of cure.

The importance of adequate follow-up in defining treatment success after external beam irradiation for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We reviewed our institution's experience treating patients with localized prostate cancer with external beam radiation therapy (RT) to determine how differences in the length of follow-up affect the determination of treatment outcome using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) Consensus Panel Definition of biochemical failure (BF).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From January 1987 through December 1997, 1109 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with definitive external beam RT at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. All patients received external beam RT to a median total prostate dose of 66.6 Gy (range: 59.4-70.4 Gy). A total of 1096 patients (99%) had sufficient prostate-specific antigen (PSA) follow-up to determine their biochemical status. To test the impact of differences in follow-up on the calculation of BF, 389 patients with at least 5 years of PSA follow-up were selected as the reference group for the initial analysis. BF was then retrospectively determined using the Consensus Panel definition at yearly intervals, ignoring the remainder of each patient's follow-up. The median follow-up for this group of patients was 6.6 years (range: 5.0-11.6 years). In a second analysis, patient cohorts were randomly selected with varying median PSA follow-up intervals in order to more accurately represent a population whose follow-up is distributed continuously over a defined range. Seven cohorts were randomly selected with 200 patients in each cohort. Cohorts were individually identified such that half of the patients (100) had 2 years or less follow-up than the stated time point for analysis and half (100) had up to 2 years more follow-up than the time point chosen for analysis. For example, in the cohort with a median follow-up of 3 years, 100 patients with a PSA follow-up from 1 to 3 years were randomly selected, and 100 patients with a follow-up from 3 to 5 years were randomly selected, thus generating a median follow-up of 3 years for this cohort (range: 1 to 5 years). This process was repeated five times for five random samples of seven cohorts each. Biochemical failure was calculated according to the Consensus Panel definition.

RESULTS

In the first analysis, significantly different rates of biochemical control (varying by 6-21%) were calculated for the same actuarial year chosen for analysis depending only upon the length of follow-up used. For example, the 3-year actuarial rate of biochemical control (BC) varied from 71% when calculated with 3 years of follow-up versus 50.4% with 7 years (p < 0.01). These differences in actuarial rates of BC were observed in all subsets of patients analyzed (e.g., PSA < 10, Gleason < or = 6, n = 132,p < 0.001; PSA < 10, Gleason > or = 7, n = 33, p = 0.03; PSA > or = 10, Gleason < or = 6, n = 109, p < 0.001; and PSA > or = 10, Gleason > or = 7, n = 72, p = 0.002). The absolute magnitude of the difference in actuarial rates of BC was greatest during years 2 (range 18-30%), 3 (range 16-25%), and 4 (range 15-24%) after treatment. In the second analysis using median PSA follow-ups (as defined above), statistically significant differences in actuarial rates of BC were again observed. For example, the 3-year actuarial rate of BC varied from 74.8% with a median follow-up of 2 years versus 49.2% with a median follow-up of 6 years. These dramatic differences in BC were still observed beyond 5 years.

CONCLUSION

When the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of BF is used to calculate treatment success with external beam RT for prostate cancer, adequate follow-up is critical. Depending upon the length of time after treatment, significantly different rates of BC (varying by 15% to 30%) can be calculated for the same time interval chosen for analysis. These results suggest that data should only be reported if the length of follow-up extends at least beyond the time point at which actuarial results are examined for the majority of patients.

The correlation between the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure and clinical outcome for patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiation. American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology

PURPOSE

We reviewed our institution's experience treating patients with external beam irradiation (RT) to determine if the ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of biochemical failure (BF) following radiation therapy correlates with clinical distant metastases free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and local control (LC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1/1/87 and 12/31/92, 568 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received external beam irradiation (RT) using localized prostate fields at William Beaumont Hospital (median total dose 66.6 Gy; range: 60-70.4 Gy). Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive increases in post-treatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) after achieving a nadir. Biochemical failure was recorded as the time midway between the nadir and the first rising PSA. Five-year actuarial rates of clinical DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were calculated for patients who were biochemically controlled (BC) versus those who failed biochemically. Median follow-up was 56 months (range: 24-118 months).

RESULTS

Five-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were significantly greater in patients who were biochemically controlled versus those who were not (p < 0.001). In patients who were BC, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 99%, 99%, 98%, and 99% respectively. For patients who failed biochemically, the 5-year actuarial rates of DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC were 74%, 64%, 89%, and 86% respectively. When stratifying by pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and T stage these differences remained significant for DMFS, DFS, and CSS. The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that BC was the single most important predictor of clinical outcome for DMFS, DFS, CSS, and LC. Pretreatment PSA and Gleason score were also independent predictors of outcome for DMFS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASTRO Consensus Panel definition of BF following radiation therapy correlates well with clinical DMFS, DFS, and CSS. These findings suggest that the Consensus Panel definition may be a surrogate for clinical progression and survival and should be considered a valid endpoint for separating successful versus unsuccessful treatment. Additional studies with longer follow-up will be needed to corroborate these findings.

Stage T3 prostate cancer: a nonrandomized comparison between definitive irradiation and induction hormonal manipulation plus prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

At our institution, a Phase II trial using androgen suppression followed by surgery was completed for men with Stage T3 disease and negative laparoscopic nodal dissection. We recently reported the unfavorable biochemical outcome of that experience. Because that analysis did not include a control group of irradiated patients, the current project was undertaken to compare that Phase II experience with clinical Stage T3 patients treated at our institution with definitive irradiation during an overlapping period of time.

METHODS

The Phase II trial included 21 patients with T3 tumors and negative laparoscopic nodal dissections treated by 4 months of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment (leuprolide +/- flutamide) prior to radical prostatectomy. Patients who declined to participate in the study or those judged ineligible by virtue of poor surgical risk were treated with definitive irradiation (n = 29). Although the radiation portals were shaped with multileaf collimation, no attempt was made to design "conformal fields." The median dose was 68 Gy (range 66 to 72) delivered in conventional fractionation. Biochemical failure after prostatectomy was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels exceeding 0.2 ng/mL. Biochemical failure after irradiation was defined as a rise in absolute level of PSA greater than 1.5 ng/mL, or two consecutive elevations of PSA on sequential measurements, even if the absolute level was less than 1.5 ng/mL.

RESULTS

In univariate comparison, the freedom from biochemical relapse rate at 3 years was 41% for irradiated patients and 23% for those treated by hormones combined with surgery (P <0.05). In a multivariate regression model controlling for the prognostic factors of baseline PSA, age, clinical substage, Gleason score, and treatment modality (induction androgen suppression + prostatectomy versus radiotherapy), only low baseline PSA independently predicted improved freedom from biochemical recurrence (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of induction hormonal treatment followed by radical prostatectomy offered no advantage over irradiation alone in this single institutional experience. Notwithstanding, the majority of men treated by definitive radiotherapy manifested biochemical failure. More innovative strategies such as conformal irradiation (either alone or combined with androgen ablation) and radiation dose escalation should be pursued to optimize outcome for this unfavorable group of patients.

Radiotherapy options for localized prostate cancer based upon pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen levels and biochemical control: a comprehensive review of the literature

PURPOSE

To review all the available radiotherapy (RT) literature on localized prostate cancer treatment where serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were used to both stratify patients and evaluate outcome and determine if any conclusions can be reached regarding an optimal radiotherapeutic management for this disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A MEDLINE search was conducted to obtain all articles in English on prostate cancer treatment employing RT from 1986-1997. Studies were considered eligible for review only if they met all the following criteria: 1) pretreatment PSA values were recorded and grouped for subsequent evaluation, 2) posttreatment PSA values were continuously monitored, 3) definitions of biochemical control were stated, and 4) the median follow-up was given.

RESULTS

Of the 246 articles identified, only 20 met the inclusion criteria; 4 using conformal external beam RT, 8 using conventional external beam RT, and 8 using interstitial brachytherapy (4 using a permanent implant alone, 3 combining external beam RT with a permanent implant, and 1 combining a conformal temporary interstitial implant boost with external beam RT). No studies using neutrons (with or without external beam RT) or androgen deprivation (combined with external beam RT) were identified where patients were stratified by pretreatment PSA levels. Results for all therapies were extremely variable with the 3-5-year rates of biochemical control for patients with pretreatment PSA levels < or = 4 ng/ml ranging from 48 to 100%, for PSA levels >4 and < or = 10 ng/ml ranging from 44 to 90%, for PSA levels >10 and < or = 20 ng/ml ranging from 27 to 89%, and for PSA levels >20 ranging from 14 to 89%. The median Gleason score, T-stage, definition of biochemical control, and follow-up were substantially different from series to series. No RT option consistently produced superior results.

CONCLUSIONS

When data are reviewed from studies using serum PSA levels to stratify patients and to evaluate treatment outcome, no consistently superior RT technique was identified. These data suggest that standard definitions of disease stage (combining clinical, pathologic, and biochemical criteria) and a common definition of biochemical cure (as developed by the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel) need to be adopted to evaluate treatment efficacy and advise patients on the most appropriate radiotherapeutic option for their disease.

Interstitial iodine-125 radiation without adjuvant therapy in the treatment of clinically localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of iodine-125 interstitial radiation in the treatment of prostate carcinoma classified as T1 or T2.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (T1, 23%; T2, 77%) were treated with iodine-125 radionuclides between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1990. Four patients died of intercurrent illness within 1 year postimplant, leaving 122 men in the study. The prescribed minimum radiation dose was 160 gray. Median follow-up was 69.3 months. Prebiopsy prostate specific antigen (PSA) values (median, 5.0 ng/mL) were available for all patients. Posttherapy evaluation included clinical, biochemical (PSA), and pathologic (repeat needle biopsy) studies. No patient was surgically staged, and none received androgen deprivation therapy. Morbidity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grading scale. Statistical appraisal was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. PSA failure was defined in two ways: (1) PSA progression, i.e., 2 consecutive increases from a nadir value; and (2) failure to attain an arbitrary serum PSA value of 1.0 or 0.5 ng/mL at last follow-up.

RESULTS

The overall 7-year survival was 77%; there were no deaths from prostate carcinoma in this cohort. The 7-year actuarial PSA progression free outcome was 89%, and the PSA < or = 1.0 ng/mL outcome was 87%. When PSA < or = 0.5 ng/mL was selected as an outcome end point, and PSA values in this series of radiation-treated patients were compared with PSA values proposed to indicate disease free survival after radical prostatectomy (PSA < or = 0.3-< or = 0.6 ng/mL), the 7-year actuarial disease free survival was 79%. Morbidity was minimal except in patients who had preimplant or postimplant transurethral prostate resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient-based iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma classified as T1 or T2 resulted in biochemical outcomes comparable to end points resulting from radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation.