Sixteen-week multidrug regimen versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy for node-positive, receptor-negative breast cancer: an Intergroup study

Redefining the Incidence and Profile of Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: The cardiac toxicity that occurs during administration of anti-tumor agents has attracted increasing concern. Fluoropyrimidines have been used for more than half a century, but their cardiotoxicity has not been well clarified. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence and profile of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) comprehensively based on literature data. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases and clinical trials on studies investigating FAC. The main outcome was a pooled incidence of FAC, and the secondary outcome was specific treatment-related cardiac AEs. Random or fixed effects modeling was used for pooled meta-analyses according to the heterogeneity assessment. PROSPERO registration number: (CRD42021282155). Results: A total of 211 studies involving 63,186 patients were included, covering 31 countries or regions in the world. The pooled incidence of FAC, by meta-analytic, was 5.04% for all grades and 1.5% for grade 3 or higher. A total of 0.29% of patients died due to severe cardiotoxicities. More than 38 cardiac AEs were identified, with cardiac ischemia (2.24%) and arrhythmia (1.85%) being the most frequent. We further performed the subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the source of heterogeneity, and compare the cardiotoxicity among different study-level characteristics, finding that the incidence of FAC varied significantly among different publication decades, country/regions, and genders. Patients with esophagus cancer had the highest risk of FAC (10.53%), while breast cancer patients had the lowest (3.66%). The treatment attribute, regimen, and dosage were significantly related to FAC. When compared with chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted agents, such a risk was remarkably increased (χ2 = 10.15, p < 0.01; χ2 = 10.77, p < 0.01). The continuous 5-FU infusion for 3–5 consecutive days with a high dosage produced the highest FAC incidence (7.3%) compared with other low-dose administration patterns. Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive global data on the incidence and profile of FAC. Different cancer types and treatment appear to have varying cardiotoxicities. Combination therapy, high cumulative dose, addition of anthracyclines, and pre-existing heart disease potentially increase the risk of FAC.

Impact of chemotherapy schedule modification on breast cancer patients: a single-centre retrospective study

Background Nonconformity to chemotherapy schedules is common in clinical practice. Multiple clinical studies have established the negative prognostic impact of dose delay on survival outcome. Objective This study investigated the prevalence and reason for chemotherapy schedule modifications of breast cancer patients. This study also investigated the impact of schedule modifications on overall survival (OS). Setting This retrospective cohort study was done among breast cancer patient receiving chemotherapy from 2013 to 2017 and patients were followed until 31 Dec 2018. Methods Medical records of patients with cancer were reviewed. Female patients over eighteen years old were included, with primary carcinoma of the breast, who received anthracycline or taxane based chemotherapy regime and completed more than two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients were categorized into three groups of (1) no schedule modification, (2) with schedule modification and (3) incomplete schedule. The Kaplan-Meier was used to test for survival differences in the univariate setting and Cox regression model was used in the multivariate setting. Main outcome measure Prevalence, overall survival rates and hazard ratio of three schedule group Results Among 171 patient who were included in the final analysis, 28 (16.4%) had no schedule modification, 118 (69.0%) with schedule modification and 25 (14.6%) had incomplete schedule with OS of 75.0%, 59.3% and 52.0% respectively. 94% (189) of all cycle rescheduling happened because of constitutional symptoms (70), for non-medical reasons (61) and blood/bone marrow toxicity (58). When compared to patients with no schedule modification, patients with schedule modification had a 2.34-times higher risk of death (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.03-5.32; p = 0.043). Conclusion Nonconformity to the chemotherapy schedule is common in clinical practice because of treatment complications, patients' social schedule conflicts, and facility administrative reasons. Cumulative delays of ≥ 14 days are likely to have negative prognostic effect on patient survival. Thus, the duration of the delays between cycles should be reduced whenever possible to achieve the maximum chemotherapeutic benefit.

Patient reported outcomes as endpoints in medical research

This review covers a number of the many design and analytic issues associated with clinical trials that incorporate patient reported outcomes as primary or secondary endpoints. We use a clinical trial designed to evaluate a new therapy for the prevention of migraines to illustrate how endpoints are defined by the objectives of the study, the methods for handling longitudinal assessments with multiple scales or outcomes, and the methods of analysis in the presence of missing data.

Extended adjuvant chemotherapy in endocrine non-responsive disease

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

There is a biological rationale for expecting benefit from longer duration therapy in the subpopulation of patients with endocrine non-responsive disease. Such tumors have a rapid cell proliferation and are associated with a high risk of relapse despite adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, prolonged duration of chemotherapy may be particularly relevant for patients with triple negative disease to inhibit the growth of tumors that are not susceptible to the effects of endocrine therapies due to lack of steroid hormone receptors, or to the effects of anti-HER2 target treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The question of duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer has been directly addressed in several trials herein presented. Most of these were small and, therefore, unsuitable for detecting differences of modest magnitude in intrinsic biological subtypes. In addition, a number of trials examine regimens which differ in duration of therapy, but also in the drugs given. In these trials the effects of duration and choice of drug are inextricably confounded. However incremental chemotherapy strategies, compared with less extensive therapies, were more effective in past studies particularly in patients with endocrine non-responsive disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence resulting from past trials indicates that conventional-dose chemotherapy for 4-6 months is an adequate option in patients whose tumors present a low or no expression of steroid hormone receptors. These tumor subtypes are part of a highly heterogeneous subgroup (e.g., basal-like, molecular apocrine, claudin-low, HER-enriched). Tailored research through international cooperation is key to solidify consensus on how to treat individual patients with endocrine non-responsive breast cancer.

Enhancing nurse contributions to SWOG clinical trials

OBJECTIVES

To review nursing research contributions and future opportunities for nurses in cooperative oncology group research in SWOG (formerly Southwest Oncology Group).

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed journal articles, grant submissions, professional manuals, research policy reports, and meeting minutes.

CONCLUSION

Nurses and nurse researchers have had active roles in SWOG research involving quality of life, symptom management, recruitment and adherence, and data quality. There are opportunities for nurses to make greater contributions to cooperative group research, particularly in cancer survivorship, health outcomes, and quality of life.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nursing science and evidence-based practice will be enhanced by conducting nursing research in the multi-site cooperative group setting.

Survival in patients with metastatic recurrent breast cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: little evidence of improvement over the past 30 years

BACKGROUND

Population-based studies have shown improved survival for patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer over time, presumably because of the availability of new and more effective therapies. The objective of the current study was to determine whether survival improved for patients who developed distant recurrence of breast cancer after receiving adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Adjuvant chemotherapy trials coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group that accrued patients between 1978 and 2002 were reviewed. Survival after distant disease recurrence was estimated for progressive time periods, and adjusted for baseline covariates in a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 13,785 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy in 11 trials, 3447 (25%) developed distant disease recurrence; the median survival after recurrence was 20 months (95% confidence interval, 19 months-21 months). Factors associated with inferior survival included a shorter distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), estrogen receptor-negative and progesterone receptor-negative disease, the number of positive axillary lymph nodes present at the time of diagnosis, and black race (P < .0001 for all). When the time period of recurrence was added to the model, it was not found to be significantly associated with survival for the general population with disease recurrence. Survival improved over time only in those patients with hormone receptor-negative disease with a DRFI ≤ 3 years, both among the 5 most recent and the entire trial data sets (P = .01 and P = .05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to reports from population-based studies, no general improvement in survival was observed over the last 30 years for patients who developed distant disease recurrence after adjuvant chemotherapy after adjusting for DRFI. Improved survival for patients with hormone receptor-negative disease with a short DRFI suggests a benefit from trastuzumab.

Obesity at diagnosis is associated with inferior outcomes in hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Obesity has been associated with inferior outcomes in operable breast cancer, but the relation between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes by breast cancer subtype has not been previously evaluated.

METHODS

The authors evaluated the relation between BMI and outcomes in 3 adjuvant trials coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group that included chemotherapy regimens with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, including E1199, E5188, and E3189. Results are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models (HR >1 indicates a worse outcome). All P values are 2-sided.

RESULTS

When evaluated as a continuous variable in trial E1199, increasing BMI within the obese (BMI, ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) and overweight (BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m(2)) ranges was associated with inferior outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER-2)/neu-negative disease for disease-free survival (DFS; P = .0006) and overall survival (OS; P = .0007), but not in HER-2/neu-overexpressing or triple-negative disease. When evaluated as a categorical variable, obesity was associated with inferior DFS (HR, 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.46; P = .0008) and OS (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.67; P = .002) in hormone receptor-positive disease, but not other subtypes. In a model including obesity, disease subtype, and their interaction, the interaction term was significant for OS (P = .02) and showed a strong trend for DFS (P = .07). Similar results were found in 2 other trials (E5188, E3189).

CONCLUSIONS

In a clinical trial population that excluded patients with significant comorbidities, obesity was associated with inferior outcomes specifically in patients with hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer treated with standard chemohormonal therapy.

Stopping or reporting early for positive results in randomized clinical trials: the National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group experience from 1990 to 2005

Randomized clinical trials are designed with stopping boundaries to guide data monitoring committees with their decision making concerning ongoing trials. In particular, when extremely positive results are seen and a boundary is crossed, the data monitoring committee may recommend releasing the results earlier to the public than at the definitive final analysis time specified in the protocol. For trials that are still accruing, this also means stopping accrual. Because the information about treatment efficacy is more limited in an early analysis than in a final analysis, questions have been raised about the appropriateness of incorporating early stopping for positive results in trial designs. In particular, there are concerns that treatment effects seen early may not be real or may be overly optimistic. To examine this issue, we collected information about treatment efficacy on National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group trials that were stopped early for positive results (information both at the time the trial was stopped/released and at times of further follow-up). Twenty-seven such trials were located. For 17 of 18 of these trials with sufficient follow-up information, the treatment effect was similar or only slightly smaller at last follow-up compared with the stopping/release time. We critically evaluate reasons why one might be concerned about early stopping for positive results. We conclude that for trials with well-designed interim monitoring plans, the ability to stop early for positive results is an important component of the trial design, allowing the public to benefit as soon as possible from the study conclusions.

Cirrhosis-like radiological pattern in patients with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic toxicity of breast cancer therapy is well known, usually consisting of elevation in the serum levels of hepatic enzymes or fatty infiltration of the liver. The chemotherapeutic agents most commonly linked to hepatotoxic effects are methotrexate, anthracyclines, taxanes and cyclophosphamide. There are few reports of patients with liver metastasis having radiological findings mimicking cirrhosis, both in the presence or the absence of prior systemic chemotherapy. Hepatotoxicity of antineoplastic drugs and cellular necrosis induced by response of liver metastases to chemotherapy may play a critical role in its physiopathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This article reports a series of ten women with breast cancer (nine with liver metastasis) treated with chemotherapy or hormonotherapy.

RESULTS

They had low risk factors for hepatic disease, but developed a cirrhosis-like appearance in the computed tomography scan. The patient without liver metastasis is the second of this kind described in the literature. Relatively few reports have documented clinical sequelae of portal hypertension. In our series, three patients had oesophageal bleeding varices needing be hospitalised. To our knowledge, these are the first cases reported in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

This suggests that some manifestations of portal hypertension may develop in association with the cirrhosis- like pattern induced by breast cancer therapy.

The role of health-related quality of life in early discontinuation of chemotherapy for breast cancer

To examine the role of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in early treatment discontinuation among women enrolled in a breast cancer clinical trial. A total of 464 women were enrolled in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized controlled trial of adjuvant regimens comparing six cycles of cytoxan, adriamycin and 5-flurouricil (5-FU) with a 16-week regimen (weekly therapy with cytoxan, adriamycin, vincristine, methotrexate, and 5-FU) among women with lymph node positive breast cancer. One hundred sixty-four women participated in the HrQL substudy using the Breast Chemotherapy Questionnaire, which was designed to measure HRQOL in women receiving chemotherapy. Changes in global HRQOL score were examined over time as a predictor of early treatment discontinuation using generalized estimation equations (GEE) modeling and Cox proportional hazards regression. We considered early treatment discontinuation as a longitudinal binary variable determined at each time point HRQOL was measured. The results of multivariate GEE model fitting indicated that declines in HRQOL (p=0.04), older age (p=0.02), higher degree of nausea (p=0.02), higher degree of neurosensory toxicity (0.03) and lower degrees of hair loss (p=0.004) were correlated with early treatment discontinuation. We then fitted a proportional hazard regression model for time to early discontinuation with HRQOL score as a time-dependent covariate. The results were identical. Declines in HRQOL during therapy predicted early treatment discontinuation even after accounting for age and chemotherapy-related side effects. In the age of ever more aggressive treatments for breast cancer, women's perception of the impact of these treatments on their lives will become more important.

Cardiovascular Health and Aromatase Inhibitors

Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of death in North American women, and so death resulting from cardiovascular disease, rather than from malignancy, is not uncommon in breast cancer patients. This may be a consequence of the shared risk factors for developing breast cancer and cardiovascular disease, as well as the difficulty of managing cancer patients at higher risk for developing cardiovascular disease. Recently, much attention has focused on understanding the cardiovascular risk factors associated with breast cancer therapies. Tamoxifen has a lowering effect on serum lipids and is reported to decrease the risk of myocardial infarction but to increase the risk of thromboembolic events. Current data indicate that aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are not associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic or cerebrovascular events. Reports of a greater incidence of hypercholesterolaemia when AIs are compared head-to-head with tamoxifen may be a result of the intrinsic lipid-lowering effects of tamoxifen therapy and may be confounded by differences in data collection among trials. The incidence of cardiovascular events associated with AIs in large trials has been reported to be higher in trials comparing AIs with tamoxifen; comparisons within the MA.17 trial, which evaluated an AI versus placebo, did not show increases in hypercholesterolaemia or in cardiovascular events with the AI. When treating breast cancer patients, oncologists should consider the same positive lifestyle changes that are proposed to lower the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients who do not have breast cancer. Moreover, physicians should assess cardiovascular risk, and monitor and treat patients already diagnosed with or at risk for coronary heart disease, according to established guidelines.

Chemoendocrine therapy for premenopausal women with axillary lymph node-positive, steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: results from INT 0101 (E5188)

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy, tamoxifen, and ovarian ablation/suppression (OA/OS) are effective adjuvant approaches for premenopausal, steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The value of combined therapy has not been clearly established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Premenopausal women with axillary lymph node-positive, steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (1,503 eligible patients) were randomly assigned to six cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF), CAF followed by 5 years of monthly goserelin (CAF-Z), or CAF followed by 5 years of monthly goserelin and daily tamoxifen (CAF-ZT). The primary end points were time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for CAF-Z versus CAF, and CAF-ZT versus CAF-Z.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 9.6 years, the addition of tamoxifen to CAF-Z improved TTR and DFS but not OS. There was no overall advantage for addition of goserelin to CAF.

CONCLUSION

Addition of tamoxifen to CAF-Z improves outcome for premenopausal node-positive, receptor-positive breast cancer. The role of OA/OS alone or with other endocrine agents should be studied more intensely.

Leukemia incidence following primary breast carcinoma treatment

BACKGROUND

The results of randomized clinical trials have suggested that after receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, patients with primary breast carcinoma have an increased risk of developing leukemia. In the current study, the authors set out to assess the reported association between breast carcinoma treatment and leukemia risk.

METHODS

A registry of all patients with breast carcinoma who were treated at a community-based institution since 1989 (updated annually for recurrence and/or vital status) was linked to the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to confirm complete ascertainment of leukemia cases occurring within this registry population. Incidence rates were calculated for women who were treated for primary Stage 0-III breast carcinoma and had a follow-up duration of > or = 24 months (n = 2866). Patients who did not undergo surgery (n = 5), patients for whom chemotherapy records were incomplete or who received nonstandard chemotherapy regimens (n = 69), patients who underwent stem cell transplantation (n = 83), and patients who were lost to follow-up or who had unknown disease status at follow-up (n = 81) were excluded from the analysis (total, n = 238).

RESULTS

Among patients diagnosed with breast carcinoma between 1992 and 1999, the crude overall leukemia incidence rate was 0.28%, and the acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) incidence rate was 0.11%. The average follow-up duration was 5.46 years (minimum, 2 years). Eight incident cases of leukemia were documented (2 cases of AML, 1 case of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 1 case of MDS/refractory anemia with excess blasts, 2 cases of chronic myelogenous leukemia, and 2 cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia). National age-adjusted overall leukemia incidence rates for the period 1996-1998 predict the occurrence of 9 cases (incidence rate, 0.31%) in the current cohort of women ages 21-94 years. The incidence of leukemia by treatment category was as follows: no surgery/no chemotherapy/no radiotherapy, 2 of 154 patients (1.30%); surgery/no chemotherapy/radiotherapy, 4 of 1403 patients (0.29%); surgery/chemotherapy/no radiotherapy, 0 of 352 patients (0%); and surgery/chemotherapy/radiotherapy, 2 of 957 patients (0.21%).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to findings reported from previous randomized clinical trials, the authors did not find evidence of increased posttreatment leukemia incidence in association with the use of chemotherapy, including doxorubicin-based regimens.

Development and validation of a patient-specific predictive instrument for the need for dose reduction in chemotherapy for breast cancer: a potential decision aid for the use of myeloid growth factors

A predictive instrument for chemotherapy dose reductions would help optimize delivery of planned chemotherapy and rationalize the use of myeloid growth factors. We analyzed data on 833 women with breast cancer treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil, for six cycles in two phase III clinical trials. From the first study ( n=323), we generated a logistic regression model that predicts an individual patient's probability of receiving significantly reduced chemotherapy, defined as less than 85% of the planned dose over cycles 2-6, using data generated from cycle 1. The model was validated on data from the second study ( n=510). The predictive model's variables include nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) in cycle 1 (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06-0.30, P<0.001) and percent drop of platelets between day 1 and the nadir in cycle 1 (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05, P<0.001). Both variables are dose adjusted based on the chemotherapy cycle 1 dose. The model's discriminatory performance was good (ROC area=0.82), as was the calibration of predicted with actual frequencies of dose reductions. In the validation dataset, model variables remained significant, with an ROC area of 0.78 and good calibration. In summary, we devised and validated a predictive instrument that uses data from a patient's first cycle of chemotherapy to compute the probability of requiring a significant chemotherapy dose reduction on subsequent cycles. This instrument could help clinicians select patients who will benefit from early administration of myeloid growth factors.

Side effects of chemotherapy and combined chemohormonal therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer

The decision to receive chemotherapy or chemohormonal therapy involves careful consideration of both the potential benefits and possible risks of therapy. There are substantial short- and long-term side effects from chemotherapy. By convention, short-term side effects include those toxic effects encountered during chemotherapy, while long-term side effects include later complications of treatment arising after the conclusion of adjuvant chemotherapy. These side effects vary, depending on the specific agents used in the adjuvant regimen as well as on the dose used and the duration of treatment. There is also considerable variability in side effect profile across individuals. This review will focus on the short- and long-term toxicity seen with the most commonly used adjuvant chemotherapy and chemohormonal therapy regimens.

Adjuvant therapy for very young women with breast cancer: need for tailored treatments

Breast cancer rarely occurs in women below the age of 35 years. Data from various sources indicate that diagnosis at such an age is associated with a dire prognosis mainly because of a more aggressive presentation. Although the effect of chemotherapy for premenopausal patients is substantial, recent evidence on 2233 patients suggested that very young women with endocrine-responsive tumors had a statistically significantly higher risk of relapse than older premenopausal patients with such tumors. In contrast, results for younger and older premenopausal patients were similar if their tumors were classified as endocrine nonresponsive. Information from studies on 7631 patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone in trials of three major U.S. cooperative groups showed a similar interaction between the effect of age and steroid hormone receptor status of the primary tumor. Better treatments for very young patients are required and may involve ovarian function suppression in addition to other endocrine agents in patients with endocrine responsive tumors and a more precise investigation of chemotherapy and its timing, duration, and intensity in those with endocrine nonresponsive tumors. Very young women with this disease are faced with personal, family, professional, and quality-of-life issues, which further complicate the phase of treatment decision making. The development of more effective therapies for younger patients requires tailored treatment investigations and cannot rely on information predominantly contributed from older premenopausal women.

Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a joint analysis of two randomised trials investigating three versus six courses of CMF

Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil adjuvant combination chemotherapy for breast cancer is currently used for the duration of six monthly courses. We performed a joint analysis of two studies on the duration of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer to investigate whether three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil might suffice. The International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VI randomly assigned 735 pre- and perimenopausal patients to receive 'classical' cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil for three consecutive cycles, or the same chemotherapy for six consecutive cycles. The German Breast Cancer Study Group randomised 289 patients to receive either three or six cycles of i.v. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil day 1, 8. Treatment effects were estimated using Cox regression analysis stratified by clinical trial without further adjustment for covariates. The 5-year disease-free survival per cents (+/-s.e.) were 54+/-2% for three cycles and 55+/-2% for six cycles (n=1024; risk ratio (risk ratio: CMFx3/CMFx6), 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.18; P=0.99). Use of three rather than six cycles was demonstrated to be adequate in both studies for patients at least 40-years-old with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours (n=594; risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.08; P=0.19). In fact, results slightly favoured three cycles over six for this subgroup, and the 95% confidence interval excluded an adverse effect of more than 2% with respect to absolute 5-year survival. In contrast, three cycles appeared to be possibly inferior to six cycles for women less than 40-years-old (n=190; risk ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.80; P=0.22) and for women with oestrogen-receptor-negative tumours (n=302; risk ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.57; P=0.37). Thus, three initial cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil chemotherapy were as effective as six cycles for older patients (40-years-old) with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours, while six cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil might still be required for other cohorts. Because endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and GnRH analogues is now available for younger women with oestrogen-receptor-positive tumours, the need for six cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil is unclear and requires further investigation.

Impact of two different dose-intensity chemotherapy regimens on psychological distress in early breast cancer patients

In order to improve outcome, new, often more toxic chemotherapy regimens are continuously investigated in early breast cancer patients. Because the expected survival improvement is small, the possible increase in the negative effects of the new treatments should be carefully evaluated. Negative effects are represented not only by acute and chronic toxicity, but also by the adverse psychological impact of chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on patient-reported psychological distress of an increase in the dose-intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with a standard regimen. Psychological distress was evaluated at baseline, during chemotherapy and after 6 and 12 months in breast cancer patients enrolled in a phase III multicentre study comparing the standard adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil every 21 days (CEF21) with the same chemotherapy given every 14 days (CEF14). 392 patients were randomised in participating centres, and 363 were evaluable for this study. Overall, 1095 out of 1446 expected questionnaires (75.7%) were collected and evaluable. At baseline, the mean scores of psychological distress were similar in the two arms. During chemotherapy, a significantly higher psychological distress was observed in the CEF14 compared with the CEF21 arm (32.3 +/- 1.3 versus 27.6 +/- 1.3; P=0.009), as well as a higher cumulative incidence of anaemia, mucositis, diarrhoea, alopecia, bone pain and fatigue was observed in the CEF14 arm. In multivariate analyses, mucositis (P=0.01), asthenia (P=0.059), and CEF14 treatment (P=0.054) were independently associated with a higher psychological distress. After 6 months, psychological distress was again similar in the two arms and significantly lower when compared with baseline within each arm. A dose-intensive adjuvant regimen induces a higher, although transient, psychological distress in early breast cancer patients. Final results of the randomised trial will indicate whether such higher adverse effects of the dose-intensive regimen are counterbalanced by a higher efficacy of the experimental treatment in terms of survival.

Is òne cycle every three or four weeks' obsolete? A critical review of dose-dense chemotherapy in solid neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Shortening the interval between cycles is one means of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy, and can be supported by biological and mathematical rationales. Our objective was to assess the clinical relevance of the rapid repetition of regimens (so-called 'dose-dense chemotherapy') in various solid neoplasms.

DESIGN

The medical literature was reviewed in accord with Mulrow's recommendations. Randomised studies comparing frequently-repeated chemotherapy to standard regimens as well as open studies are described and critically examined.

RESULTS

Dose-dense regimens were widely found to be feasible. In small-cell lung cancer, survival of patients receiving dose-dense regimens was better than that of patients treated by standard chemotherapy in three trials, two of which reached significance, when these intensive regimens allowed better dose intensity. In poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors, a dose-dense regimen was not better than standard therapy, perhaps because of an excessively high toxicity-related death rate. However, recent phase II studies have provided encouraging results. In early breast cancer, the one published randomized study in the adjuvant setting showed only a trend towards better disease-free survival in node-positive women receiving a weekly-repeated regimen. Two randomized trials failed to show any benefit in the neoadjuvant setting with a dose-dense regimen. No evidence of a benefit was provided in metastatic breast cancer. In advanced colorectal cancer, evidence of an improvement in survival with weekly or bi-weekly 5-FU-leucovorin compared to a classic monthly schedule has recently been shown in two randomized trials, and dose-dense regimens are recognized as standard therapy in many countries. Phase II studies of dose-dense regimens have also shown high response rates and long survival in many neoplasms, including Ewing's sarcoma, gestational trophoblastic disease, ovarian carcinoma and gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable amount of experience has been gained with frequently-repeated regimens. A few randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for survival on standard chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer and advanced colorectal cancer. However, this benefit appears to be weak. The combination of dose-dense chemotherapy regimens with new anti-cancer strategies based on our insights into the mechanisms of oncogenesis is a challenge on the eve of the millennium.

Quality of life and quality adjusted survival for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)

PURPOSE

The objective was to compare health related quality of life (QOL) in hormone receptor negative, node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy to determine whether a more intensive chemotherapy regimen has an adverse effect upon QOL that is not balanced by improvements in disease control or survival. Increased physical symptoms, including fatigue and the inconvenience of the dose intensive 16-week regimen, were expected to have a negative impact on QOL.

DESIGN

QOL was measured in 163 patients, randomized to either a standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and 5-flurouracil (CAF) or a 16-week multidrug regimen, using the Breast Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ). The 30 item BCQ was self-administered prior to therapy, during therapy, and 4 months post treatment.

RESULTS

BCQ scores decreased (worsened) more during therapy on the 16-week regimen, median change -1.4, than on CAF, median change -0.8 (p < 0.001). By 4 months post treatment, BCQ scores were higher than pre-treatment and equal in the two arms (CAF: 8.1 and 16 weeks: 8.2, p = 0.6). Over a period of 48 months, patients on the 16-week regimen averaged 1.4 fewer months of treatment with toxicity, 4.0 more months without symptoms and 0.7 fewer months post recurrence compared to patients on the CAF regimen. Given typical values for these health states, the gain in Q-TWiST observed for the CAF regimen during treatment shifted to the 16-week regimen after 1 year, with a gain of 2.0 to 2.4 months after 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The hypothesized negative impact of the dose intensive 16-week regimen was confirmed by the BCQ assessments. However, Q-TWiST analysis suggests a small gain for the 16-week regimen. The later results should be interpreted with caution with the limited follow-up of 4 years.

New data on adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

In the past year, the results of the third Oxford Overview and recommendations from the St. Gallen International Consensus Panel on adjuvant treatment for breast cancer were published. Reports of trials addressing the role of anthracyclines and taxanes, as well as the optimal dosing schedule for cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil, also appeared. Data show that primary therapy increases the rate of breast conservation but not survival rates. The initial results of trials of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic support have been mixed. The usefulness of sentinel node biopsy in minimizing surgical morbidity and of biologic markers in predicting response to adjuvant therapy are areas of active research.

Adjuvant systemic management of early stage carcinoma of the breast

In the last three decades, there has been a gradual, though significant change in the treatment of early stage breast cancer. For almost a century, physicians advocated an "anatomical view" of the dissemination of this disease, which justified a more radical and mutilating treatment strategy. Finally in the mid-1970s, results from large randomized trials began to show that either mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation therapy were appropriate treatment for women with early stage disease. These results suggested that breast cancer can actually be a systemic disease ("biological view") even in early stages. This hypothesis was confirmed when large randomized clinical trials demonstrated the effectiveness of adjuvant systemic therapy in controlling micrometastatic disease in women with node-positive and node negative disease. As we approach the end of this century, most patients with early stage disease will be offered some form of adjuvant systemic therapy, before or after local treatment with surgery, with or without local radiation therapy. There has been a lot of interest on the proper sequence of the therapeutic modalities, in particular with the recent publication of larger randomized trials of primary systemic therapy. This specific topic is discussed elsewhere in this issue by Singletary.