Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer: improved disease control and survival

Delineation of Oral Mucosa as a Pseudo-Organ-at-Risk May Lead to a Decrease in the Incidence of Oral Mucositis: A Dosimetric Analysis of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Plans in Head and Neck Cancers

Introduction

Oral mucositis is a common and potentially serious complication of radiation in head and neck cancer treatment. Severe mucositis causes pain, difficulty in chewing and swallowing that can cause treatment breaks and can cause treatment failures leading to local recurrence or a decrease in overall survival. The contouring of the planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risk (OAR) leaves some undefined regions on computed tomography imaging. The treatment planning system uses these regions as dumping sites for the dose in order to achieve the optimum plan. The present study was done to assess the dose going to these unspecified regions termed as pseudo-OARs and whether delineation of these structures and prescribing a dose constraint will reduce the dose to the oral mucosa without compromising the quality of the treatment plan.

Methods

Twenty patients of head and neck cancer were selected and were randomly placed in two arms. One was intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) arm I, which included the initial plans with which the patients were treated where the pseudo-OAR was not delineated and hence was not considered in the planning process. After giving treatment, the pseudo-OAR was delineated to see the dose dumped into the area outside the PTV. The other was IMRT arm II, where another virtual plan of the same patients of arm I was made wherein the delineation of the pseudo-OAR was done before planning and dose constraint prescribed. The pseudo-OAR consisted of anterior oral mucosa, part of mandible and maxilla, which was adjacent to the PTV in oropharynx and contralateral buccal mucosa patients. The dose constraint given to the pseudo-OAR was Dmean ≤30 Gy. Statistical significance was calculated by using a paired t-test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

The dosimetric parameters of PTV were comparable in both the IMRT arms. The pre-specified objective was fulfilled with both the study arms. The dose homogeneity and conformity was also similar. The dosimetric parameters of other OARs were within the prescribed dose constraints. The Dmean value of the pseudo-OAR in arm I was 31.28 Gy ± 3.55 Gy and 7.87 Gy ± 9.11 Gy in arm II and the p-value was significant (p=0.001), whereas the Dmax in arm I was 61.82 Gy ± 5.91 Gy and 61.23 Gy ± 5.54 Gy in arm II (p=0.6). The dose to the pseudo-OAR in IMRT arm II was reduced drastically by 75%, which was statistically significant.

Conclusion

The delineation of oral mucosa as a pseudo-OAR should routinely be done. The dose constraints need to be optimized by clinical studies, which might probably decrease the incidence and severity of oral mucositis.

Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Neo-Adjuvant and Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Aim and background

To evaluate feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NA-CT) followed by CT + radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced or unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods

22 HNSCC patients were enrolled (18 males, 4 females; median age, 59.5 years; median ECOG PS, 1). Sites of disease: oral cavity, 18.2%; oropharynx, 40.9%; hypopharynx, 18.2%; larynx, 4.6%, multiple sites, 18.2%. T (tumor) category: T2, 13.6%; T3, 31.8%;T4, 54.5%. N (nodes) category: N0, 9.1%; N1, 18.1%; N2, 40.9%; N3, 31.8%. Stage: III, 4.6%; IVA, 63.6%; IVB, 31.8%. Induction carboplatin (AUC = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) × 3 cycles (q21 days) were given. Responders received definitive radiotherapy with concurrent carboplatin (35 mg/m2/day from days 1 to 5 in weeks 1, 3, 5 and 7) and paclitaxel (50 mg/m2 on days 10, 24 and 38). Patients with node involvement were suggested to undergo postradiotherapy neck dissection.

Results

NA-CT. 97% of planned chemotherapy cycles were administered. Prevalent toxicity was hematologic: 50% G4 neutropenia and 31.8% G3, one neutropenic fever. All patients had alopecia. Complete responses in T and N were 4 (18.2%) and 3 (15%), respectively. Partial responses were 13 (59%) and 9 (45%). There was 1 progressive disease. CT + RT. 79.9% of planned cycles of CT were administered. In 19 patients (86.4%) more than 50% of planned cycles of CT were completed. Median dose of RT was 70.2 Gy on T/N+ and 54 Gy on N0. Limiting toxicity was mucositis in 77.3%, followed by neutropenia (59.1% G3–G4). Median weight loss was 4.9%. 18.2% of patients required hospitalization. Complete responses in T and N were 15 (68.1%) and 8 (40%), respectively. Partial responses were 5 (22.7%) and 7 (35%).

Conclusions

The preliminary results of this study are encouraging, despite the toxicity. Adequate follow-up is required to evaluate efficacy in terms of local-regional control and overall survival.

Future chemotherapy and radiotherapy options in head and neck cancer

Chemoradiation is a standard approach to advanced unresectable head and neck cancer, although the optimum combination regimen remains controversial. However, in the past few years, chemoradiation has been successfully extended from the treatment of unresectable disease to the postsurgical therapy of high-risk patients and its value as an organ preservation procedure is under evaluation. More recently, molecular-targeted therapies have emerged, which interfere with mechanisms of chemo- and radioresistance, and preliminary data are promising. Their use in the combined treatment of head and neck cancer will hopefully further improve the value of chemoradiation in the clinical setting.

Induction Chemotherapy to Weekly Paclitaxel Concurrent with Curative Radiotherapy in Stage IV (M0) Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Dose Escalation Study

The purpose was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly paclitaxel with concurrent, daily irradiation in patients with unresectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma previously submitted to induction chemotherapy. Patients with stage IV, and unresectable tumor and/or node/s were enrolled. Nine male patients were submitted to a course of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 2 given every 3 weeks for three courses. Curative radiotherapy (RT) started 3 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy with the goal of delivering a total dose of 66-70 Gy. During RT weekly paclitaxel was administered for 6 courses if feasible; paclitaxel was given according to a dose escalation schema in cohorts of three patients. Dose level A, 30 mg/m2; dose level B, 40 mg/m2; dose level C, 50 mg/m2. During weekly paclitaxel the major toxicity was mucositis that required a treatment break in two of three patients in dose level C; mucositis grade 4 required interruption of paclitaxel administration in all these patients. RT can be given in a continuous fashion with weekly paclitaxel after induction chemotherapy. The MTD of weekly paclitaxel was 40 mg/m2.

Continuous intra-arterial chemotherapy for downstaging locally advanced oral commissure carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness, safety, and efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) infusion chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced oral commissure cancer.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with stages III and IV squamous cell carcinoma involving the mouth angle were recruited. Methotrexate (MTX; 50 mg/day) was continuously infused into the external carotid artery for a mean period of 8 days, followed by weekly IA bolus of 25 mg MTX for a mean period of 10 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (62%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 7 patients (33%) had a partial response (PR). At a median follow-up of 69 months, the estimated 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of the patients with CR versus PR were 100% versus 57%, 92% versus 43%, and 80% versus 43%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that continuous IA chemotherapy could achieve a competitive acceptable survival rate and improved locoregional control of advanced oral commissure cancer.

Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Treatment for patients with head and neck cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach. Radiotherapy is employed as a primary treatment or as an adjuvant to surgery. Each specific subsite dictates the appropriate radiotherapy techniques, fields, dose, and fractionation scheme. Quality of life is also an important issue in the management of head and neck cancer. The radiation-related complications have a tremendous impact on the quality of life. Modern radiotherapy techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy, can offer precise radiation delivery and reduce the dose to the surrounding normal tissues without compromise of target coverage. In the future, efforts should be made in the exploration of novel strategies to improve treatment outcome in patients with head and neck cancer.

Chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced cervical adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment of women with advanced adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix is still undefined. We compared concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy with CCRT alone for advanced cervical adenocarcinoma in a randomized trial at the Hunan Provincial Tumor Hospital in China.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2007, 880 patients with clinical FIGO stages IIB-IVA cervical adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive either CCRT or chemoradiation with one cycle of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with Paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2))+Cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) before receiving radiation and two cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with the same drugs after radiotherapy in 3-week intervals. The disease control and survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

All patients completed the treatment plan. 340 patients have relapsed, with a median follow-up duration of 60 months. Patients who received chemoradiation with adjuvant chemotherapy showed a significantly longer disease-free (P<.05), cumulative survival (P<.05) and long-term local tumor control (P<.05). Patients who received CCRT alone had significantly more distant metastasis and pelvic failure than those who received chemoradiation with adjuvant chemotherapy (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

Incorporating neo-adjuvant and consolidation chemotherapy with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin into concomitant chemoradiation is highly effective, safe and may be a very promising treatment protocol for advanced cervical adenocarcinoma.

Induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin to concurrent radiotherapy and weekly paclitaxel in the treatment of loco-regionally advanced, stage IV (M0), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mature results of a prospective study

Background

to evaluate activity and toxicity of a sequential treatment in advanced, non metastatic, mostly unresectable, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Patients with loco-regionally advanced or unresectable, head and neck cancer, were prospectively treated with 3 courses of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation. Induction chemotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 2, given every 3 weeks, to a total of three courses. Curative radiotherapy started 4 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy with the goal of delivering a total dose ≥ 66 Gy. During RT weekly paclitaxel (40 mg/m2) was administered.

Results

The trial accrued 43 patients from January 1999 to December 2002. All patients received 3 courses of induction chemotherapy and the planned dose of radiotherapy. Thirty-eight patients were able to tolerate weekly paclitaxel during irradiation at least for 4 courses. After induction therapy there were 32 overall responses, 74.4% (23 partial and 9 complete); at completion of concomitant treatment overall responses were 42, 97.7% (20 partial and 22 complete). Median time to treatment failure was 20 months and the disease progression rate at 3 and 5 years was 33% and 23%, respectively. The median overall survival time was 24 months and 3 and 5 years overall survival rates were 37% and 26%, respectively. The major toxicity was mucositis.

Conclusions

This combined treatment was found to be feasible and active in advanced or unresectable, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Long-term results observed in this trial encourage to consider this approach in further investigation using newer radiation delivering technique and new molecularly agents.

Integrating systemic agents into multimodality treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer

Although highly debated in the 1980s, randomized clinical trials have provided undeniable evidence that systemic chemotherapy, as part of a multimodality treatment collaboration, is effective in improving survival, organ preservation and local-regional control in locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). We are entering an exciting period in which new chemotherapy agents, new paradigms of treatment, new surgical and radiation technology, and new prognostic factors are rapidly becoming available. Information on how to integrate these new tools and on how they affect long-term outcomes are lacking, making decision making and treatment planning more difficult. With unprecedented survival and the changing demographics of HNC we must now consider long-term consequences in addition to survival and local and regional control as important factors in therapeutic decision making. The availability of different treatment plans that incorporate systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery give us many tools with which to craft a treatment for each individual patient. Today, in this exciting and chaotic period, a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach for each HNC patient at the start of decision making and planning is a necessity and the absolute standard of medical treatment for excellent patient care.

Combined antegrade and retrograde esophageal dilation for head and neck cancer-related complete esophageal stenosis

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Assess the safety and efficacy of combined antegrade and retrograde esophageal dilation (CARD) for complete esophageal stenosis following head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. Review HNC dysphagia management.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of all patients undergoing CARD following HNC treatment between May 2001 and September 2008.

METHODS

Forty-five patients were identified for review. Parameters assessed included: ability to obtain intraoperative esophageal patency, complications, number of dilations required, diet, and gastric tube (GT) status. Factors associated with dilation failure were analyzed.

RESULTS

Intraoperative esophageal patency was obtained in 91% of patients. Median number of all dilations per patient was three. Median number of CARDs per patient was one. Resumption of oral intake occurred in 36/45 (80%). Diet results included: regular or soft diet 32/45 (71%), GT removal 27/45 (60%), and GT dependence with nothing by mouth 9/45 (20%). Laryngeal and pharyngeal stenosis, radionecrosis, tracheotomy dependence, and elongated stenosis were associated with dilation failure. Complications occurred in 18/63 (29%) CARD procedures: eight pneumomediastinum, seven GT site problems, two esophageal perforations, and one pharyngeal infection. All complications resolved spontaneously or with minimal interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

CARD was safe and effective. Intraoperative patency was achieved in 91% of patients. Eighty percent resumed oral intake. The majority of patients had their GTs removed and resumed a soft or regular diet. Dilation failure was associated with laryngeal, pharyngeal, and excessively long esophageal stenosis, often resulting from radionecrosis. Complications were minor. CARD should be considered before relegating patients with complete esophageal stenosis to chronic GT dependence or subjecting them to laryngopharyngo esophagectomy.

Preliminary results of pre-radiation neck dissection in head and neck cancer patients undergoing organ preservation treatment

CONCLUSION

Pre-RT ND in patients with HNSCC undergoing organ preservation treatment is safe, advantageous, poses no additional morbidity owing to the elective neck dissection, and may possibly improve survival outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Establish the role of pre-radiation neck dissection (pre-RT ND) in patients with head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing organ preservation treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with histologically confirmed HNSCC in stages III approximately IV with proven regional metastasis were enrolled in the organ preservation approach incorporating pre-RT ND at a tertiary referral center between May 1998 and August 2004. Site matched patients treated with organ preservation intent in the conventional fashion were used as controls. Data were collected for their diagnosis, management, treatment outcome, and follow up.

RESULTS

Disease free survival was significantly better for the pre-RT ND group. There was no significant difference in overall survival, pattern of recurrence, and primary organ preservation rate between the two groups. No significant morbidity owing to neck dissection was noted in patients who underwent neck dissection. Although the delivery of radiation to the primary site was delayed for patients in the pre-RT ND group, it did not influence the major outcomes.

Prophylactic gastrostomy placement and early tube feeding may limit loss of weight during chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer, a preliminary study

OBJECTIVES

Most patients with advanced head and neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy need tube feeding for at least some weeks. For these periods gastrostomy tubes have advantages over nasogastric tubes. Tube feeding may start earlier and thus loss of weight may be limited if the gastrostomy tube already is in place. The objective of this study is to analyse the results of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement and early tube feeding.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary head and neck oncology team in a general hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty consecutive patients with unresectable stage III and IV head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In all patients prophylactic PEG placement was performed. Tube feeding was initiated if food-intake became insufficient or loss of weight occurred.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Loss of weight during treatment, complication rate, PEG duration.

RESULTS

The mean loss of weight during treatment for all patients was only 2.8%. One complication of tube placement occurred: a colon perforation, treated successfully by surgery. The median duration of the PEG was 178 days. Three of the 17 patients (18%) with no evidence of disease (NED) still had a PEG at their last follow-up visit. Of the 26 patients who died of their cancer, 13 used the PEG until death.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of weight was limited after prophylactic gastrostomy placement and early tube feeding. Moreover, the complication rate was low. In 82% of the NED patients the PEG could eventually be removed.

The challenging integration of platinum compounds, taxanes, and molecular-targeted therapies in the multidisciplinary treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

There have been important advances in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). For patients with unresectable disease, the use of platinum-based chemoradiotherapy has improved the 3-year survival rate from 15-20% to 35-50%. The results of recent studies involving sequential therapy of induction chemotherapy including taxanes and chemoradiation have shown encouraging survival rates, near to 60-70%. Moreover, progress in the understanding of the molecular changes that lead to the development of these tumors is bringing novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches into clinical practice, promising new hope to patients with a devastating and lethal disease.

Induction chemotherapy for squamous cancer of the head and neck

This paper reviews the efficacy and hazard of sequential combined treatment programs for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. These regimens consist of initial systemic chemotherapy, known as neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy, followed by radiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy.

Concurrent use of vinorelbine and gefitinib induces supra-additive effect in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines

PURPOSE

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) remains a clinical challenge because of the high rate of locoregional disease recurrence. Standard treatment includes surgery, radiation, chemoradiation or a combination of these approaches. New therapies are needed to achieve improved survival, quality of life and organ function in these patients. A novel molecular targeted therapy incorporated into our current treatment strategies may have a significant role in the treatment of HNSCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of HNSCC cell lines to vinorelbine combined with gefitinib in vitro.

METHODS

Six recently established cell lines were used: UT-SCC-9, -11, -19A, -29 and -34 (laryngeal SCC) and UT-SCC-33 (oral cavity SCC). Chemosensitivity was tested using the 96-well plate clonogenic assay. The vinorelbine concentrations used varied between 0.4 and 1.0 nM and the gefitinib concentrations varied between 0.05 and 1.6 muM. Survival data were fitted to the LQ model, and the area under the curve (AUC) value was obtained with numerical integration. The type of interaction was determined by comparing the AUC ratio of the two drugs to the survival fraction (SF) of gefitinib alone.

RESULTS

In the current study the combination of vinorelbine and gefitinib had a clear supra-additive or additive cytotoxic effect on the HNSCC cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding is encouraging as a proof of the possible benefit of combing an EGFR targeting compound with a cell cycle specific drug and warrants further studies of available combinations in vitro.

DNA-Repair Gene Polymorphisms Predict Favorable Clinical Outcome Among Patients With Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Treated With Cisplatin-Based Induction Chemotherapy

Purpose

Cisplatin kills tumor cells through DNA cross linking. Alterations in the function of DNA repair genes may affect DNA repair proficiency and influence cancer patients' response to cisplatin. We studied whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of DNA repair genes predict the response to cisplatin or prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

Methods

A polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) approach was used to determine the frequency of the SNPs: XPD-Asp312Asn, XPD-Lys751Gln, ERCC1-C8092A, and XRCC1-Arg399Gln in DNA from peripheral lymphocytes of 103 stage IV SCCHN patients.

Results

The frequencies of the distinct genotypes were, respectively, for the homozygous common allele, heterozygous and homozygous polymorphic variant: 53%, 40%, and 7% for ERCC1; 50%, 42%, and 8% for XPD-312; 35%, 57%, and 8% for XPD751; and 35%, 51%, and 13% for XRCC1. Patients with only common alleles at all the SNPs tested had a median overall survival of 5.1 months (range, 4.3 to 6.0 months) as compared with not reached for patients with at least one polymorphic variant (P < .001). Estimates from Cox's multivariate analysis suggest that the accumulation of each polymorphic variant decreases the probability of dying by a factor of 2.1 (P < .001; the presence of seven polymorphic variants confers a 175-fold protection). The accumulation of polymorphic variants increases by 2.94-fold the probability of achieving a complete response to treatment (P = .041).

Conclusion

Using a multivariate model, the presence of polymorphic variants in DNA-repair genes are powerful prognosis factors and response to cisplatin predictors among SCCHN patients.

Prevention and treatment of dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiation for head and neck cancer

Safe, successful swallowing depends on complex events affected by head and neck cancers and their treatment. This article reviews the swallowing process, how it is affected by chemoradiotherapy, and the evaluation, prevention, and treatment of swallowing disorders. Specific recommendations are made to promote maintenance and recovery of swallowing function.

Chemotherapy options for patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

The purpose of this review is to provide readers with guidance concerning treatment of patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in the context of clinical trial data. We discuss issues surrounding the treatment of patients with SCCHN, with an emphasis on recommendations based on results from phase II and III clinical trials published since 1980. Many options exist for the treatment of patients with SCCHN. The most important decisions involve determining which patients are in need of treatment and which are most likely to benefit from treatment. Although many chemotherapy treatments have been shown to induce responses, survival improvement remains an unfulfilled goal. Definitive data do not exist on the effects of chemotherapy on quality of life or progression-free survival as measures of clinical benefit in this setting. Performance status, history of prior treatment, extent of tumor, and need for palliation are the most important factors in the decision to treat a patient with chemotherapy for incurable SCCHN. Single-agent treatment with conventional doses of methotrexate remains a standard for most patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Cisplatin plus fluorouracil, cisplatin plus a taxane, and single-agent taxane are the most widely studied alternatives. There is a need for further trials with end points other than overall survival or tumor response in this patient population. Guidelines for patient selection and treatment options are provided.

[Therapy options of advanced laryngeal carcinomas with regard to the quality of life of the patients]

Advanced laryngeal carcinomas are in most cases still associated with a very poor prognosis and highly reduced quality of life. This case report shows the various and severe complications that occurred after a total laryngectomy in spite of intensive medical treatment. Currently the development and introduction of new organ preserving procedures in advanced laryngeal cancer, without a loss of the prognostical outcome, represents one of the most up to date clinical oncological fields of research in head and neck cancer. This case report critically scrutinizes the current options of therapy available for patients suffering from advanced laryngeal carcinomas, as it is essential in the author's opinion that the decision on treatment is made within the scope of an intensive interdisciplinary strategy of therapy, and is reached by including all possible options available in order to achieve the best possible quality of life for the patients.

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, leucovorin, and continuous infusion fluorouracil followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Study

The primary objective of this phase II study was to access the complete response (CR) rate to a new innovative induction regimen in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LA-HNC). From October 2000 until October 2003 a total of 38 eligible patients (33 men and 5 women) entered the study. The large majority of them presented with a performance status of 0-1 and with clinical stage IV disease. Treatment consisted of three cycles of induction chemotherapy (IC) with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-h infusion on d 1, leucovorin (LV) 200 mg/m2 over 20 min immediately followed by FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and then 600 mg/m2 as a 24-h continuous infusion on d 1 and 2 and a cisplatin 75 mg/m2 over 1-h infusion on d 2 every 3 wk. This was then followed by radiation (70 Gy) and weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2. After the completion of IC, 6/38 (16%) patients had CR. The CR rate was increased to 66% post-concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Neutropenia (37.5%), pain (62%), nausea/vomiting (21%), and alopecia (79%) were the most frequent side effects during IC. The most pronounced toxicities during chemoradiotherapy were stomatitis (62.5%) and xerostomia (53%). Median time to progression was 11.0 mo and median survival 16.7 mo. One- and 2-yr survival rates were 73% and 38%, respectively. In conclusion, this novel induction regimen is active, is well tolerated, and can be successfully followed by CCRT with weekly cisplatin. CCRT should remain standard treatment for patients with LA-HNC. Novel induction combinations, such as that reported in the present study, should be evaluated in combination with CCRT only in the context of clinical trials.

Long-term results of hyperfractionated radiation and high-dose intraarterial cisplatin for unresectable oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In this report, the authors present the results from a study of patients with unresectable oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas who were treated on a protocol of hyperfractionated radiation and high-dose intraarterial cisplatin (HYPERRADPLAT) at the University of Kentucky.

METHODS

The study was designed as a prospective, single-armed case series that was conducted in the setting of a single, academic, tertiary referral center. The patient cohort consisted of 24 previously untreated patients who were diagnosed with unresectable oropharyngeal carcinoma and were treated on the HYPERRADPLAT regimen, which included hyperfractionated external beam radiotherapy (1.2 grays [Gy] twice daily) was given for 5 weeks (60 Gy) followed by high-dose intraarterial cisplatin (150 mg/m2) and sodium thiosulfate. Shrinking "large-field" portals were started on Week 6 and finished on Week 7 with a cumulative dose of 76.8-81.6 Gy. The main outcome measures of the study were the primary and neck response rates, the 2-year and 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival rates, and acute and late treatment morbidity.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 77 months. Complete response rates at the primary and regional lymph nodes were both 88%. The 2-year overall survival and disease-specific survival rates were 57% and 68%, respectively; whereas the 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival rates were 33% and 42%, respectively. Two patients had Grade 4 mucosal toxicity, and no patient experienced neurologic or significant hematologic toxicities. Within 1 year of treatment, 58% of patients had used a feeding tube.

CONCLUSIONS

The HYPERRADPLAT regimen produced excellent response rates and overall survival rates comparable to those achieved by patients who had unresectable oropharyngeal carcinomas. Tolerance of the therapy was good, and further studies using HYPERRADPLAT with induction therapy may improve outcomes further in this subset of patients with unfavorable disease.

A new concurrent chemotherapy with vinorelbine and mitomycin C in combination with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of concurrent chemotherapy with vinorelbine and mitomycin C in combination with accelerated radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced cancer of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2003 and March 2004, 15 patients with T4/N2-3 squamous cell carcinoma (12/15) and with N3 cervical lymph node metastases of carcinoma of unknown primary (3/15) were treated with chemotherapy and simultaneous accelerated RT.

RESULTS

11 patients completed therapy without interruption or dose reduction. Grade 3-4 acute mucosal toxicity was observed in 9/15 patients, grade 4 hematologic toxicity in 6/15 patients. At a median follow-up of 7.5 months, 2 patients have died of intercurrent disease, 2 patients have experienced local relapse; 5 patients are alive with no evidence of disease at the primary tumor site.

DISCUSSION

The described regimen is highly effective, but led to remarkable side effects.

Phase II trial of cisplatin, tegafur plus uracil and leucovorin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx

We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, tegafur plus uracil and leucovorin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Forty-six patients (stage IV, 83%; N2/3, 52%) were treated with PUL (50 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, 300 mg/m2 tegafur plus uracil orally and 60 mg leucovorin orally on days 1-14) over a 14-day cycle. Evaluation after 3 cycles led to chemotherapy termination if primary tumor responses were less than partial responses. Otherwise, PUL was continued up to 6 cycles before locoregional therapy. Patients achieving at least good partial responses at the primary site after neoadjuvant chemotherapy received radiotherapy for organ preservation. Chemotherapy responses were analyzed by intent-to-treat. Response rates of primary sites were 71.7% (33 of 46) with 34.8% (16 of 46) showing a complete response. Thirty patients (65.2%) achieved good partial responses at the primary site. Overall response and complete response rates of neck lymph nodes were 68.6% (24 of 35) and 25.7% (nine of 35). The combined response rate of primary site and neck lymph nodes was 63% (95% confidence interval 48.5-77.5%) with a complete response rate of 15.2%. Toxicities of WHO grade 3-4 included anemia (19.6%), diarrhea (17.4%) and neutropenia (8.7%). With a median follow-up of 36 months, overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 45.7% (21 of 46) and 41.3% (19 of 46); organ preservation rate was 90% (19 of 21). We concluded that the outpatient PUL regimen was a moderately effective, less-toxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy for SCC of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. PUL should be studied further with other active agents or radiotherapy.

New Radiation Therapy Techniques for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

This article reviews the most recent technology used in the treatment of head and neck cancer. It discusses brachytherapy, new ways to mix radionuclides for enhanced radiobiologic effects, and different fractionation schemes that have grown in clinical importance. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy has become a mainstay in head and neck cancer treatment, and the authors discuss several popular and emerging approaches. Patient immobilization and imaging are also discussed.

Phase I study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel, fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and twice-daily radiation in patients with poor-prognosis cancer of the head and neck

PURPOSE

We previously demonstrated high locoregional control, in patients with poor-prognosis head and neck cancer (HNC), using paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy. In the present phase I trial, gemcitabine, a novel antimetabolite with strong radiation-enhancing activity, replaces hydroxyurea. We sought to determine the recommended phase II dose and clinical efficacy in poor-prognosis HNC patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Seventy-two patients enrolled. Eligibility criteria included recurrent or second primary HNC, metastases or expected 2-year survival <20%. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m(2)/d, for 5 days; paclitaxel, 100 mg/m(2) on Day 1; and concurrent 1.5 Gy twice-daily radiation for 5 days. Gemcitabine was dose escalated, 50-300 mg/m(2) on day 1. Cycles repeated every 14 days until the completion of chemoradiation. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included: neutropenic fever; grade > or =4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia for >4 days; grade > or =4 mucositis or dermatitis for >7 days; or grade 3 toxicity necessitating chemotherapy dose reductions. Non-DLT dose reductions in 5-fluorouracil and/or paclitaxel were allowed.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine percent of assessable patients experienced a clinical response. Five-year actuarial survival is 33.0%, and locoregional control is 61.4%. The recommended phase II dose of gemcitabine in this regimen is 100 mg/m(2) during cycles 1-5 (1 of 7 patients with DLT) or 200 mg/m(2) delivered only during cycles 3-5 (3 of 19 with DLT). Grades 3 and 4 mucositis (56 and 21%, respectively) and dermatitis (25 and 21%, respectively) were common.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, paclitaxel, and twice-daily radiation, delivered on alternating weeks, is active in patients with poor-prognosis HNC, although severe mucositis limits the clinical applicability of this regimen. Refinements in radiotherapy, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy, may improve the tolerance for this regimen.

Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: evolution of the sequential treatment approach

Cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (PF regimen) induction chemotherapy (IC) has been studied over the last two decades and has proven to be a durable and effective therapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). Although randomized trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated that PF-based IC improves survival, reduces systemic metastases, and permits organ preservation, the effect on overall survival has been less robust than the results seen with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimens. Differences in trial design, scheduling, and surgical interventions account for some of the variation in results. As studies have evolved, it has become evident that there are advantages to both approaches. This perception has led to the concept of sequential therapy (ST), the combination of IC, CRT, and surgery. ST programs are being studied intently in many centers. Phase II and III trials of ST regimens have reported unprecedented survival results in patients with locally advanced disease. In addition, the hypothesis that PF plus a taxane may result in an improved survival, compared to PF alone, for patients with locally advanced SCCHN on ST treatments is being tested in phase III trials. Although ST has not been compared head to head with CRT, early results support the use of this treatment paradigm in patients with poor prognosis SCCHN and should lead to definitive phase III trials in the near future. ST may represent the cutting edge of therapy for patients with curable, locally advanced SCCHN.

Competing causes of death and second primary tumors in patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the emergence of second primary malignancies and the contribution of different causes of death to the outcome of patients with locoregionally advanced head and cancer receiving primary chemoradiotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We studied 324 patients with stage IV squamous cell head and neck cancer who were enrolled on five consecutive multicenter Phase II studies of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. All of the regimens included concurrent 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea on an alternate week schedule with radiotherapy, either alone (FHX) or with cisplatin (C-FHX) or paclitaxel (T-FHX). The cumulative incidence of second primary tumors or death from any cause was estimated using methods of competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up of surviving patients was 5.2 years (2-10.6 years). The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival of the cohort were 46% and 65%, respectively. Causes of death and median time of occurrence were as follows: disease (n = 88; 1.5 years), treatment-associated acute or late complications (n = 30; 4 months), second primary tumors (n = 18; 3.5 years), comorbidities (n = 41; 1.9 years), and unknown (n = 20; 5.1 years). Predominant causes of death from comorbidities were cardiac and respiratory illnesses. Twenty-six patients (8%) developed a second primary tumor at a median time of 2.8 years (4 months to 10 years). The cumulative incidence of second primary tumors was 5%, 7%, and 13% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The most frequent site of second primaries was the lung (n = 13), followed by the esophagus (n = 3) and head and neck (n = 2)

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy are potentially curable but face significant risks of mortality from causes other than disease progression. Ameliorating toxicity, and implementing secondary screening and chemoprevention strategies are major goals in the management of head and neck cancer.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been shown to be superior to radiotherapy (RT) alone in several clinical therapeutic settings for head and neck cancer (HNC). In unresectable disease, CRT is superior to RT alone, and for resectable advanced disease, it may serve as a substitute for initial surgery, with planned salvage surgery as a backup. In the postoperative setting, clinical trials suggest that CRT is superior to RT alone. Recent results of phase II studies suggest that the addition of induction chemotherapy to CRT may further enhance outcome through eradication of systemic metastases, although this will require prospective evaluation in randomized clinical trials. Additionally, chemotherapy given with hyperfractionated RT leads to improved outcome versus hyperfractionated RT alone. The optimal CRT regimen is still a matter of debate and ongoing study.

High-dose superselective intra-arterial cisplatin and concomitant radiation (RADPLAT) for advanced head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to study the effect of intensive targeted chemoradiation in a group of patients with head and neck cancer with stage IV inoperable disease.

METHODS

We examined 79 patients with inoperable stage IV head and neck cancer receiving intra-arterial infusion of high-dose cisplatin (150 mg/m(2)) on days 2, 9, 16, and 23 concomitant with delivery of external beam radiotherapy (total dose, 70 Gy; 2 Gy, 35 fractions; 1 fraction/day for 7 weeks). Sodium thiosulfate was administered intravenously to provide effective cisplatin neutralization.

RESULTS

Four patients were not assessable. Complete local tumor response was achieved in 72 patients (91%) and a partial response in three patients. The complete response rate of neck node metastases was 90%. The 1- and 2-year locoregional control rates were 82% and 69%, respectively. The median overall survival time was 2.2 years, with a 3-year overall survival probability of 43%. Acute toxicities were as follows: grade III/IV hematologic toxicity (22%/16%), grade III/IV nephrotoxicity (0%), grade III mucositis (43%), grade III skin reactions (24%), grade III toxicity of the upper gastrointestinal tract (57%), grade III nausea (20%), and grade III subjective hearing loss (10%). Grade V toxicity (treatment-related deaths) was 3.8%. Six (18%) of 33 patients with complete remission needed tube feeding 2 years after treatment without intercurrent salvage surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Supradose superselective intra-arterial cisplatin and concomitant radiation is an effective organ-preserving therapy in an unfavorable group of patients. Our series confirms encouraging results reported previously. This regimen is justified in unresectable patients despite the substantial toxicity.

Patterns of failure, prognostic factors and survival in locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy: a 9-year, 337-patient, multi-institutional experience

BACKGROUND

Locoregionally advanced, stage IV head and neck cancer has traditionally carried a poor prognosis. We sought to assess changes in patterns of failure, prognostic factors for recurrence, and overall outcome, using two different strategies of chemoradiotherapy conducted in prospective, multi-institutional phase II trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-seven stage IV patients were treated from 1989 to 1998. We compared locoregional and distant recurrence rates, overall survival and progression-free survival from two different treatment strategies: intensive induction chemotherapy followed by split-course chemoradiotherapy (type 1, n=127), or intensified, split-course, hyperfractionated multiagent chemoradiotherapy alone (type 2, n=210). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 12 chosen covariates were assessed separately for the two study types.

RESULTS

The pattern of failure varied greatly between study types 1 and 2 (5-year locoregional failure of 31% and 17% for study types 1 and 2, respectively, P=0.01; 5-year distant failure rate of 13% and 22% for study types 1 and 2, P=0.03). Combined 5-year overall survival was 47% [95% confidence interval (CI) 41% to 53%) and progression-free survival was 60% (95% CI 55% to 66%). Both treatment strategies yielded similar survival rates. Poor overall survival and distant recurrence were best predicted by advanced nodal stage. Locoregional recurrence was extremely rare for patients with T0-T3 tumor stage, regardless of lymph-node stage.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that pattern of failure in primary head and neck cancer may be dependent upon treatment strategy. Randomized clinical trials of induction chemotherapy are warranted as a means to determine if a decrease in distant metastases can lead to an increase in survival rates in the setting of effective chemoradiotherapy for locoregional control. Additionally, this analysis provides impetus for randomized clinical trials of organ preservation chemoradiotherapy in sites outside the larynx and hypopharynx.

Long-Term Results of a Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy with Uracil-Ftegafur (UFT), Vinorelbine, and Cisplatin (UFTVP) followed by Radiotherapy Concomitant with UFT and Carboplatin (RT/UFTJ) in a Primary Site Preservation Setting for Resectable Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Larynx and Hypopharynx

OBJECTIVE

We present long-term results of a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy (IC) with uracilftegafur (UFT) 200 mg/m orally days 1 to 21, vinorelbine 25 mg/m intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 100 mg/m IV day 1 (UFTVP) each for 21 days for 4 courses, followed by radiotherapy concomitant with UFT 100 mg/m orally daily and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.5 IV weekly) (RT/ UFTJ), without surgery to the primary site if response, in patients (pts) with resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. The primary endpoint was clinical complete response (CR) to induction UFTVP, and secondary endpoints were long-term overall survival (OS) and survival with primary site preservation (SPP).

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 1997, 37 pts were included. CR to IC was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43-65%). Main toxicity of UFTVP was G 3,4 neutropenia (73% of pts, 16% developed febrile neutropenia). After IC, primary site was treated with RT in 29 pts: 20 of them received RT/UFTJ (main toxicity mucositis G 3,4 70%). No pt died during treatment. Actuarial 5-year OS and SPP were 57% and 37%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach has significant activity and acceptable toxicity for achieving promising long-term OS and SPP and deserves further investigation.

Intensive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer with 5-Fluorouracil- and hydroxyurea-based regimens: reversing a pattern of failure

Combined modality programs that were developed over the past two decades demonstrated that the nonsurgical therapy of locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer is feasible and produces survival outcomes that are at least comparable with surgery. The systemic therapy of head and neck cancer has gained momentum in recent years. Several randomized studies have shown that the concurrent administration of chemotherapy and radiation therapy is superior to radiation therapy alone. In consecutive clinical studies since 1986, we have developed multiagent chemoradiotherapy regimens based on initial observations with the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea, and concomitant radiotherapy combination. Three consecutive multicenter phase II trials reported that the combination of 5-FU and hydroxyurea with either cisplatin or paclitaxel along with twice daily radiation therapy administered every other week is a highly effective regimen with local control rates that approach 90% and 3-year survival rates of approximately 60% in patients with stage IV disease. The vast majority of patients in these studies achieved anatomical organ preservation. A reversal of the historical pattern of failure was evident, with distant sites becoming the predominant site of failure in each trial. The paclitaxel-containing regimen was better tolerated than the cisplatin-containing regimen and was advanced to further clinical testing. The incorporation of induction chemotherapy may improve the results of treatment by targeting systemic micrometastatic disease.

Intraarterial cisplatin with intravenous paclitaxel and ifosfamide as an organ-preservation approach in patients with paranasal sinus carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy, organ-preservation rate, and safety of intraarterial (IA) cisplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel and ifosfamide in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the paranasal sinuses who required orbital exenteration or major craniofacial resection for complete tumor resection.

METHODS

Patients were treated with intravenous paclitaxel (135 mg/m(2)) on Day 1, ifosfamide (1000 mg/m(2)) on Days 1-3, sodium mercaptoethanesulfonate (600 mg/m(2)) on Days 1-3, and IA cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) on Day 1 every 21 days.

RESULTS

Of 24 study participants, 20 patients received at least 1 course of IA cisplatin, 1 patient had an early death, and 19 patients were evaluable for response. Five of those 19 patients (26%) achieved a complete response (CR), 6 patients (32%) achieved a partial response, and 8 patients (42%) had stable disease or developed progressive disease. Eye-sparing surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) was feasible in 7 of 24 patients, RT was offered to only 7 patients, whereas 3 patients received chemotherapy and RT, 2 patients refused further therapy, 3 patients underwent craniofacial resection with orbitectomy, and 1 patient was treated systemically for metastatic disease. At the completion of treatment, 14 of 23 patients (61%) with locally advanced disease were disease free, and the orbit was preserved in 21 of 24 patients (88%). The overall survival, progression-free survival, and disease-free survival rates at 2 years were 60%, 50%, and 84%, respectively. Toxicity was substantial, with two patients experiencing cerebrovascular ischemia (one transient and one cerebrovascular accident) and three patients experiencing cranial neuropathy, which was reversible in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the encouraging organ-preservation rate, the approach studied resulted in substantial toxicity, and more effective adjunctive therapy is needed. Alternative approaches, including the integration of targeted therapy agents in induction chemotherapy regimens followed by concomitant chemotherapy and RT or eye-sparing surgery, need further exploration.

Modern management of locally advanced cervical carcinoma

Radiation was until recently the key and only modality for the routine treatment of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. However after years of studying multi-modality treatments as an alternative to radiation alone in randomized phase III trials, the standard treatment has changed to chemo-radiation based on cisplatin. Three recent meta-analyses have confirmed that cisplatin-based chemo-radiation adds an absolute 12% benefit in five-year survival over radiation therapy alone. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiation has not been of proven benefit, but when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is followed by surgery, an absolute increase of 15% in five-year survival over radiation alone is seen. This benefit in survival is comparable to that obtained with the current chemo-radiation schedules based on cisplatin. Despite these encouraging results there remains room for improvement as the five-year survival of patients treated with chemo-radiation ranges from nearly 80% in bulky IB tumours to only 25% in stage IVA disease. Other therapeutic approaches need to be fully evaluated including the use of chemo-radiation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; the use of new drug combinations and the multi-modality combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery plus adjuvant chemo-radiation. Likewise, the addition of radiosensitizers to cisplatin, preoperative chemo-radiation and/or adjuvant chemotherapy may eventually improve the currents results of cisplatin-based chemo-radiation. Nevertheless, it is hard to foresee a dramatic increase in cure rate, even with the most optimal combination of cytotoxic drugs, surgery and radiation, and thus the testing of molecular targeted therapies against cervical cancer is a logical step to follow.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for N2 or N3 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck from an occult primary

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to explore the use of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the management of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck from an occult primary (HNCOP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1991 to 2000, 25 patients with T0N2M0 or T0N3M0 HNCOP were entered into five sequential phase II clinical trials. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of a split course of radiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea either alone or with cisplatin, or paclitaxel. Two of the five protocols incorporated induction chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Nodal stage was N2a in five patients (20%), N2b in 13 (52%), N2c in one (4%) and N3 in six (24%). Twenty-two patients (88%) underwent neck dissection; 14 of 22 patients underwent neck dissection before initiating protocol therapy. Total radiation doses of 55-75 Gy (median 60 Gy) were delivered; radiation fields included the potential sites of mucosal primaries and the neck bilaterally. Selected patients received a radiation boost to the involved neck. With a median follow-up of 3.9 years, three patients have progressed (one local, two distant) and seven patients have died. Deaths were due to disease progression (three) or unrelated causes (four). No metachronous primaries developed. The 5-year progression-free and overall survival was 87% and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Combined-modality treatment with intensive chemoradiotherapy results in excellent disease control and long-term survival for patients with N2-N3 HNCOP and compares favorably with traditional therapy.

Radiation-induced mucositis: a randomized clinical trial of micronized sucralfate versus salt & soda mouthwashes

Oral mucositis is one of the major toxicities caused by radiation therapy (RT) treatments to the head and neck. The clinical efficacy of sucralfate (Carafate R) mouthwash for head and neck cancer patients (HNC) is not consistent across studies. In this study, it was hypothesized that if the particles in the original sucralfate suspension were micronized (i.e., < or = 25 microns) then the coating action of the mouthwash in the oral cavity would be enhanced. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the efficacy of micronized sucralfate (Carafate R) mouthwash and salt & soda mouthwash in terms of the severity of the mucositis, the severity of mucositis-related pain, and the time required to heal RT-induced mucositis in patients with HNC. Severe mucositis and related pain can interfere with the ingestion of food and fluids, so patients' body weights were measured as well. All patients in this randomized clinical trial carried out a systematic oral hygiene protocol called the PRO-SELF: Mouth Aware (PSMA) Program. Patients who developed RT-induced mucositis anytime during their course of RT were randomized to one of the two mouthwashes and followed to the completion of RT and at one month following RT. Two referral sites were used for the study. Repeated measures occurred with the following instruments/variables: MacDibbs Mouth Assessment and weight. Demographic, disease, and cancer treatment information was also obtained. Thirty patients successfully completed the study. The typical participant was male (70%), married/partnered (70%), White (63%), not working or retired (73%), and had an average of 14.5 years of education (SD = 3.7). T-tests and Chi-square analyses with an alpha set at 0.05 were used to compare differences between the two mouthwashes. No significant differences were found in the number of days to onset of mucositis (i.e., 16 +/- 8.4 days). When patients had their worst MacDibbs score, (i.e., the most severe mucositis), there were no significant differences between the mouthwashes as to MacDibbs score, the RT dose received, or ratings of pain (upon swallowing). Similarly, at the end of RT, no significant differences were found between mouthwashes as to MacDibbs scores or ratings of pain (upon swallowing). At the one-month follow-up assessment no significant differences were found between the mouthwashes in MacDibbs scores or pain ratings (upon swallowing). The analysis of the efficacy of the two mouthwashes revealed no significant differences in the time to heal (in days) from the RT-induced mucositis. The findings from this trial provide important clinical information regarding cost analysis of RT mucositis management. Given that there is no significant difference in efficacy between micronized sucralfate and salt & soda, use of the less costly salt & soda is prudent and cost-effective.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

Since 1990, we have treated patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer with induction chemotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy. We herein report the results of our experience.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1990 to 1999, 27 patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer were treated with induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Using the American Joint Committee on Cancer's 1992 stage classification, all patients were stage III (11%) or IV (89%). By histology, 63% were poorly differentiated carcinoma and 37% squamous cell carcinoma. The median age was 42 years. Three cycles of induction chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and interferon-alpha2b were administered, followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy consisting of seven cycles of 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea and once-daily radiotherapy (FHX) on a week-on week-off schedule. The median radiotherapy dose was 70 Gy.

RESULTS

Clinical response to induction chemotherapy was 100%, 54.2% complete response (CR) and 45.8% partial response. Clinical and/or pathological (37% of all patients had post-treatment biopsy with or without neck dissection) CR after FHX was 100%. At a median follow-up of 52 months, three failures were observed. Two patients have died of disease, one of local failure and one of distant metastases. One patient is alive with an isolated rib metastasis. At 5 years, actuarial locoregional control is 93% and actuarial distant control 92%. The overall survival at 3 and 5 years is 88% and 77%, respectively. Four patients died of unrelated illnesses and had no evidence of disease with respect to their nasopharyngeal cancer. The progression-free survival at 3 and 5 years is 92% and 86%, respectively. Thirty-three per cent of patients required a reduction in the chemotherapy dose due to acute toxicity. Chronic toxicity was not observed, with all patients able to eat orally without dietary restrictions.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer with induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy resulted in excellent overall survival with acceptable toxicity. These results are encouraging and warrant further investigation of intensified approaches.

Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by concomitant paclitaxel, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea chemoradiotherapy: curative and organ-preserving therapy for advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The paclitaxel, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea regimen of paclitaxel, infusional fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and twice-daily radiation therapy (TFHX) administered every other week has resulted in 3-year survival rates of 60% of stage IV patients. Locoregional and distant failure rates were 13% and 23%, respectively. To reduce distant failure rates, we added a brief course of induction chemotherapy to TFHX.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients received six weekly doses of carboplatin (AUC2) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) followed by five cycles of TFHX.

RESULTS

Ninety-six percent had stage IV disease. Response to induction chemotherapy was partial response 52% and complete response (CR) 35%. Symptomatically, there was a significant reduction in mouth and throat pain. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (36%). Best response following completion of TFHX was CR in 83%. Toxicities of TFHX consisted of grade 3 or 4 mucositis (74% and 2%) and dermatitis (47% and 14%). At a median follow-up of 28 months, locoregional or systemic disease progression were each noted in five patients. The overall 3-year progression-free survival was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71% to 90%), and the 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 77% (95% CI, 66% to 87%) and 70% (95% CI, 59% to 82%), respectively. At 12 months, five patients were completely feeding-tube dependent.

CONCLUSION

Administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel before TFHX chemoradiotherapy results in high response activity and may decrease distant failure rates. Overall survival, progression, and organ preservation/functional outcome data support definitive evaluation of this approach.

Organ preservation therapy using induction plus concurrent chemoradiation for advanced resectable oropharyngeal carcinoma: a University of Pennsylvania Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy, feasibility, and toxicity of a new regimen for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had technically resectable stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, exclusive of T1-2N1. Induction chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin (area under the curve formula equal to 6) and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) for two cycles, followed by re-evaluation. Patients with major response continued to definitive radiotherapy (70 Gy over 7 weeks) plus concurrent once-weekly paclitaxel (30 mg/m(2)/wk). Patients with advanced neck disease also underwent post-radiation therapy neck dissection and two more chemotherapy cycles.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 31 months (minimum follow-up for survivors was 18 months). The major response rate to induction chemotherapy was 89%; 90% of patients had a complete response after concurrent chemoradiation. Actuarial survival at 3 years was 70%, and 3-year event-free survival was 59%. The 3-year actuarial locoregional control was 82% and the 3-year actuarial rate of distant metastases was 19%. Organ preservation was achieved in 77% of all patients. One patient (2%) died during therapy. Late grade 3 toxicity occurred in 24% of patients, consisting mainly of chronic dysphagia/aspiration and/or radiation soft tissue ulceration. The treatment-related mortality rate was 4% (two patients died from respiratory failure).

CONCLUSION

Response to induction chemotherapy as studied in this trial was not useful as a predictive marker for ultimate outcome or organ conservation. Overall, however, this regimen offers good disease control and survival for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma, comparable with other concurrent chemoradiation programs. Further study of similar protocols is indicated.

Concomitant chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: results from two consecutive phase II studies

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies comparing induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection with radiation alone found that the neoadjuvant approach produces better results. So far, this latter modality has not been compared with standard concomitant chemoradiation. The objective of this report was to compare the results of two consecutive phase II studies: neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery or chemoradiation for the unresectable cases versus standard cisplatin-based chemoradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 1999 to July 1999, 41 patients with cervical carcinoma, stages IB2-IIIB, were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of three 21-day courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, followed by either surgery or concomitant chemoradiation for the non-operable cases. From August 1999 to December 1999, an equal number of patients having comparable clinicopathological characteristics were treated with six weekly courses of cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) during standard pelvic radiation.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were analyzed. Both groups were similar with regard to age, histology, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, tumor size, pretreatment hemoglobin levels, parametrial infiltration and performance status. In the neoadjuvant arm the overall response rate to induction chemotherapy was 95% (95% confidence interval 88% to 100%). Twenty-three patients had surgery and 14 underwent chemoradiation. In the definitive chemoradiation study, 38 patients completed treatment, the median number of cisplatin courses was six for a dose intensity of 33 mg/m(2)/week. Doses to points A and B were 85 Gy (range 68-95) and 55 Gy (range 51-65), respectively. Chemoradiation was delivered in 44.6 (range 28-113) days. Complete response rates after all treatment were similar: 97% and 87% in the neoadjuvant and chemoradiation groups, respectively. At a median follow-up of 28 (range 2-33) and 24 (range 3-30) months, respectively, there were no differences in overall survival. To date, 15 and 13 patients in the neoadjuvant and chemoradiation groups, respectively, have died of disease (P = 0.8567).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this non-randomized comparison suggest that induction chemotherapy followed by surgery or chemoradiation is at least as effective in terms of response and survival as standard cisplatin-based chemoradiation. A randomized study is needed to confirm these findings.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation-induced regression of advanced cervical lymphadenopathy in head and neck cancer as a predictor of outcome

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiation (ICCR)-induced advanced neck disease regression could predict outcome, especially the need for complete neck dissection in patients with N2-3 stage IV head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

A retrospective study of 339 patients evaluated for treatment of stage IV HNC during the years 1988 to 1997 revealed 36 individuals with N2-3 cervical lymphadenopathy who were treated with ICCR. Responses to treatment, patterns of failure, and survival rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

Primary and regional tumor regressions were complete in 21 patients (58%), partial in 9 (25%), and absent in 6 (17%); the corresponding local failure rates were 5%, 44%, and 33% (P < 0.02). The regional failure rates were 24%, 89%, and 83%, respectively (P < 0.001); distant failure rates were 10%, 0%, and 0% (P > 0.99). The estimated 2-year survival rates for complete and partial/nonresponders were 57% and 20%, respectively (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced regional metastases of HNC who respond completely to ICCR have an excellent chance for survival. However, such ICCR-induced complete regression of regional tumor cannot reliably predict ultimate neck disease control.

Cisplatin, tegafur, and leucovorin: a moderately effective and minimally toxic outpatient neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin, tegafur, and leucovorin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for patients with advanced, nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

METHODS

Patients with SCCHN according to World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 2 or less and adequate organ function were enrolled. The CT regimen (PTL) was 50 mg/m(2) cisplatin (P) on Day 1, 800 mg per day oral tegafur (T), and 60 mg per day oral leucovorin (L) for 14 days. The CT was administered at outpatient clinics for 14-day cycles. PTL was initiated with the intent of organ preservation and it was continued for a maximum of six cycles before locoregional therapy. Reevaluation after three cycles led to the termination of CT when the response was less than a partial response. CT was discontinued immediately upon evidence of tumor progression or excessive toxicity.

RESULTS

From March 1996 through July 1999, 97 patients were enrolled consecutively. All participants were men with a median age of 56 years (range, 37-70 years). The primary tumor sites were the tongue base, 14, and the hypopharynx, 83. Sixteen percent of the tumors were Stage III, 84% were Stage IV, 62% were Stage T4, and 44% were Stage N2-3. The median number of CT cycles was six. On an intent-to-treat basis, 26 patients (27%) achieved complete responses and 32 patients (33%) achieved partial responses. The overall response rate was 60% (95% confidence interval, 50-70%). The most common toxicities of WHO Grade 3 or higher included (percent of patients): anemia, 8.3%; stomatitis, 6.3%; thrombocytopenia, 3.1%; and vomiting, 3.1%. With a median follow-up period of 3 years, the overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 40% and 38%, respectively. Organ preservation was achieved in 70% (29 of 37) of the surviving patients.

CONCLUSION

The outpatient PTL regimen was a moderately effective and minimally toxic CT for SCCHN. PTL should be studied further in combination with other active agents or radiotherapy for patients with SCCHN.