Comparative effects of three cytokine regimens after high-dose cyclophosphamide: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and sequential interleukin-3 and GM-CSF

Interleukin-3 coordinates glial-peripheral immune crosstalk to incite multiple sclerosis

Glial cells and central nervous system (CNS)-infiltrating leukocytes contribute to multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the networks that govern crosstalk among these ontologically distinct populations remain unclear. Here, we show that, in mice and humans, CNS-resident astrocytes and infiltrating CD44hiCD4+ T cells generated interleukin-3 (IL-3), while microglia and recruited myeloid cells expressed interleukin-3 receptor-ɑ (IL-3Rɑ). Astrocytic and T cell IL-3 elicited an immune migratory and chemotactic program by IL-3Rɑ+ myeloid cells that enhanced CNS immune cell infiltration, exacerbating MS and its preclinical model. Multiregional snRNA-seq of human CNS tissue revealed the appearance of IL3RA-expressing myeloid cells with chemotactic programming in MS plaques. IL3RA expression by plaque myeloid cells and IL-3 amount in the cerebrospinal fluid predicted myeloid and T cell abundance in the CNS and correlated with MS severity. Our findings establish IL-3:IL-3RA as a glial-peripheral immune network that prompts immune cell recruitment to the CNS and worsens MS.

GM-CSF, IL-3, and IL-5 Family of Cytokines: Regulators of Inflammation

The β common chain cytokines GM-CSF, IL-3, and IL-5 regulate varied inflammatory responses that promote the rapid clearance of pathogens but also contribute to pathology in chronic inflammation. Therapeutic interventions manipulating these cytokines are approved for use in some cancers as well as allergic and autoimmune disease, and others show promising early clinical activity. These approaches are based on our understanding of the inflammatory roles of these cytokines; however, GM-CSF also participates in the resolution of inflammation, and IL-3 and IL-5 may also have such properties. Here, we review the functions of the β common cytokines in health and disease. We discuss preclinical and clinical data, highlighting the potential inherent in targeting these cytokine pathways, the limitations, and the important gaps in understanding of the basic biology of this cytokine family.

Mobilisation strategies for normal and malignant cells

This review evaluates the latest information on the mobilisation of haemopoietic stem cells for transplantation, with the focus on what is the current best practice and how new understanding of the bone marrow stem cell niche provides new insights into optimising mobilisation regimens. The review then looks at the mobilisation of mesenchymal stromal cells, immune cells as well as malignant cells and what clinical implications there are.

Advances in mobilization for the optimization of autologous stem cell transplantation

In autologous stem cell transplantation, mobilized peripheral blood has replaced the bone marrow as the preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Because HSCs normally exist in the blood in very low numbers, the use of agents to "mobilize" HSCs from the marrow niche to the peripheral blood is essential for successful transplantation. Until recently, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor were the only approved agents by the US Food and Drug Administration for use as peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)-mobilizing agents in the United States, but G-CSF has become the gold standard. Unfortunately, some patients fail to mobilize sufficient numbers of PBSCs for transplantation in response to G-CSF with or without chemotherapy. Recently, a new agent, plerixafor (AMD3100) added to G-CSF has been approved to enhance PBSC mobilization. This review will discuss the current methodologies to improve hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.

Targeting stem cell niches and trafficking for cardiovascular therapy

Regenerative cardiovascular medicine is the frontline of 21st-century health care. Cell therapy trials using bone marrow progenitor cells documented that the approach is feasible, safe and potentially beneficial in patients with ischemic disease. However, cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation strategies should aim to conserve the pristine healing capacity of a healthy organism as well as reactivate it under disease conditions. This requires an increased understanding of stem cell microenvironment and trafficking mechanisms. Engagement and disengagement of stem cells of the osteoblastic niche is a dynamic process, finely tuned to allow low amounts of cells move out of the bone marrow and into the circulation on a regular basis. The balance is altered under stress situations, like tissue injury or ischemia, leading to remarkably increased cell egression. Individual populations of circulating progenitor cells could give rise to mature tissue cells (e.g. endothelial cells or cardiomyocytes), while the majority may differentiate to leukocytes, affecting the environment of homing sites in a paracrine way, e.g. promoting endothelial survival, proliferation and function, as well as attenuating or enhancing inflammation. This review focuses on the dynamics of the stem cell niche in healthy and disease conditions and on therapeutic means to direct stem cell/progenitor cell mobilization and recruitment into improved tissue repair.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide, sequential granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, and scheduled commencement of leukapheresis in 225 patients undergoing autologous transplantation

BACKGROUND

Interpatient variability in the kinetics of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization is commonly seen with conventional chemotherapy-based mobilization regimens. This necessitates the availability of leukapheresis (LP) facilities 7 days a week.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The efficacy of an approach where LP was invariably commenced on Day 11 after intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide followed by sequential administration of granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (CSF) and granulocyte-CSF (Cy/GM/G) was retrospectively analyzed in 225 consecutive, unselected patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for all diagnoses other than acute leukemia at our center. Cy/GM/G was scheduled to avoid weekend LP.

RESULTS

After Cy/GM/G, a CD34+ cell yield of at least 2.0x10(6) per kg was achieved in 90.7 percent of patients. Optimal yield (OY; >or=5x10(6) or 10x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg depending on diagnosis) was achieved in 67.6 percent of patients. Only three patients (1.3%) required LP on Saturday or Sunday. Febrile neutropenia (FN) was encountered in 5.3 percent. PBPC yield was highest on Day 1 of LP (p<0.001). In multivariate analyses, platelet (PLT) count on Day 1 of LP (PLT-D1LP) was positively associated with achievement of OY (p<0.001). PLT-D1LP and diagnosis of myeloma were associated with a shorter time to achieve a CD34+ cell yield of at least 5x10(6) per kg (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Cy/GM/G with scheduled LP commencement on Day 11 enables optimal CD34+ cell yields in most patients undergoing autologous transplantation, despite a low risk of FN and avoidance of weekend LP.

Hematopoietic growth factors for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and expansion

During inflammation and cytopenia, increased levels of hematopoietic growth factors (HPGFs) induce mobilization and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), resulting in spatial and quantitative in vivo expansion of the hematopoietic tissue. Exogenous administration of recombinant HPGFs, particularly granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), is routine for mobilization of stem cells, followed by collection and transplantation of autologous or allogeneic stem cells. In this review, we summarize experience using different HPGFs and HPGF combinations for stem cell mobilization, such as G-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-3 (IL-3), stem cell factor (SCF), and others. Preclinical and clinical studies of so-called early- and late-acting HPGFs for ex vivo expansion of HPCs are discussed, also with respect to the unresolved question whether expansion of repopulating stem cells can be achieved in vitro.

PBSC mobilization

Intentional recruitment of hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to peripheral blood is a clinical process termed peripheral blood stem cell (PSBC) mobilization. Mobilized PSBC has replaced bone marrow as the preferred source of stem cells for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy because of rapid and durable engraftment and reconstitution of functional bone marrow. Although the mechanism involved in the process of PBSC mobilization by cytokines is largely unknown, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or chemotherapy combined with GCSF is used as a mobilizing agent in current clinical practice. To date, G-CSF is the best cytokine for PBSC mobilization. However, there are some controversies in its efficacy (poor mobilizer) and safety (in allogeneic donors). Recent research progress has revealed some part of the mechanistic scenarios of PBSC mobilization and found promising candidates for the agents for PBSC mobilization. Until the research at molecular and cellular levels elucidates the precise mechanisms, collecting and comparing clinical observations is the best way to find more optimal condition for PBSC mobilization.

Lack of dendritic cell mobilization into the peripheral blood of cancer patients following standard- or high-dose chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor

BACKGROUND

Dendritic cells (DC), the most specialized antigen-presenting cells, can be detected in the peripheral blood (PB) and divided into two subsets of populations, DC1 and DC2, endowed with different functions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on DC release and on their subsets of three regimens utilized to mobilize CD34+ cells into the PB in cancer patients and in normal CD34+ cell donors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The mobilizing sequences were: standard-dose epirubicin+taxol+granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; 15 patients with advanced breast cancer), high-dose cyclophosphamide (CTX)+G-CSF (10 patients with breast cancer patients and 7 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, NHL), and G-CSF alone (5 normal donors of CD34+ cells for allogeneic transplantation). Comparative data were obtained from the steady-state PB of 20 healthy volunteers. For flow cytometric analysis, DC were gated as negative for specific lineage markers (CD3, CD11b, CD14, CD16, CD56, CD19, CD20, CD34) and positive for HLA-DR. The DC1 and DC2 subsets were defined as CD11c and CDw123 positive, respectively.

RESULTS

The percentages of DC at baseline and the time of CD34+ cell peak were: 0.48 and 0.51 for standard-dose chemotherapy (CT); 0.55 and 0.63 for breast cancer after high-dose CTX+G-CSF; 0.53 and 0.71 for NHL after high-dose CTX+G-CSF; and 0.51 and 0.54 for normal donors of CD34+ cells after G-CSF alone (all p=n.s.). Mean DC1/DC2 ratios in each study group at the time of CD34+ cell peak were 0.10, 0.12, and 0.18, respectively. Finally, in the group of healthy volunteers, the percentage of circulating DC was 0.95 and the mean DC1/DC2 ratio was 1.28.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first report that demonstrates that both standard-dose or high-dose CT, when utilized together with G-CSF, do not induce DC mobilization into the PB, whereas a reversed DC1/DC2 ratio is observed. Furthermore, a lack of significant DC mobilization after G-CSF alone was also seen, in contrast to what was previously observed by others. These data should be taken in account when evaluating clinical correlations between DC number and CPC engraftment in both the transplantation setting, when monitoring the effects on the immune system of combinations of new drugs and/or cytokines, and when high numbers of DC are required for both experimental and clinical applications.

The whys and hows of hematopoietic progenitor and stem cell mobilization

Intentional mobilization of hematopoietic/stem cells into the circulation has improved the efficiency of their collection. Transplantation of mobilized blood stem cells to patients with marrow aplasia results in a faster pace of hematopoietic recovery than transplantation of marrow-derived stem cells. Autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are increasingly performed with blood-derived cells. Donors of both autologous and allogeneic blood stem cells do not always respond well to therapies designed to produce mobilization. Autologous donors may respond poorly as a result of myelotoxic damage inflicted by prior antitumor therapy, but this explanation is not valid for allogeneic donors. The mechanism(s) involved in the process of mobilization are incompletely understood. Until these mechanisms are elucidated, methods to improve mobilization vigor on a rational basis will not be obvious. In the meanwhile, clinical observations may provide some hints regarding the whys and hows of mobilization and permit incremental improvements in this process.

The enhanced in vitro hematopoietic activity of leridistim, a chimeric dual G-CSF and IL-3 receptor agonist

The in vitro activity of leridistim was characterized for cell proliferation, generation of colony-forming units (CFU) and differentiation of CD34+ cells. In AML-193.1.3 cells, leridistim exhibited a significant increase in potency compared to rhG-CSF, SC-65303 (an IL-3 receptor agonist) or an equimolar combination of rhG-CSF and SC-65303. CFU-GM assays demonstrated that at 50% of the maximum response, the relative potency of leridistim was 12-fold greater than the combination of rhG-CSF and rhIL-3 and 44-fold more potent than rhG-CSF alone. In multi-lineage CFU assays, a combination of erythropoietin (rhEPO) and leridistim resulted in greater numbers of BFU-E, CFU-GEMM and CFU-Mk than rhEPO alone. Ex vivo culture of peripheral blood or bone marrow CD34+ cells with leridistim substantially increased total viable cells over cultures stimulated with rhG-CSF, SC-65303, or a combination of rhG-CSF and SC-65303. Culture with leridistim, resulted in a greater increase in myeloid (CD15+/CD11b+), monocytic (CD41-/CD14+) and megakaryocytic (CD41+/CD14-) precursor cells without depleting the progenitor pool (CD34+/CD15-/CD11b-). These results demonstrate that leridistim is a more potent stimulator of hematopoietic proliferation and differentiation than the single receptor agonists (rhG-CSF and SC-65303) either alone or combined. These unique attributes suggest that leridistim may enhance hematopoietic reconstitution following myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

Frequency and differentiation capacity of circulating LTC-IC mobilized by G-CSF or GM-CSF following chemotherapy: a comparison with steady-state bone marrow and peripheral blood

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to compare directly the frequency of circulating LTC-IC and E-LTC-IC mobilized in peripheral blood (PB) after chemotherapy supported by either G-CSF (PB-G) or GM-CSF (PB-GM) in comparison to steady-state bone marrow (BM) and PB (PB-ST) values in the same patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Long-term cultures (LTC) were performed from 20 patients with malignant lymphoma at saturating cell concentrations to assess bulk progenitor cell production and by limiting dilution assay (LDA) to measure both frequency of LTC-IC and their proliferative and differentiation capacities.

RESULTS

While CFC production in bulk LTC was higher at weeks 3-5 with PB-G than with PB-GM samples, week-5 LTC-IC and week-10 LTC-IC (E-LTC-IC) frequencies were not different using a LDA. However, the number of CFC derived from a single LTC-IC was higher in PB-G patients than in PB-GM patients (p = 0.01). Interestingly, the frequency of LTC-IC per 1 x 10(5) MNC in mobilized PB positively correlated with one-year marrow progenitor cell recovery, in contrast to the number of autografted CD34(+) cells and CFU-GM per kg.

CONCLUSION

Both G-CSF and GM-CSF resulted in similar increases in LTC-IC and E-LTC-IC in PB at comparable levels to those present in BM. However, the differentiation capacity of LTC-IC was higher after mobilization with G-CSF than with GM-CSF, suggesting qualitative differences in LTC-IC mobilized with these growth factors.

Enhancement of platelet recovery after myelosuppressive chemotherapy by recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor in patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE

To explore the influence of dose and schedule on the ability of pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor (PEG-rHuMGDF) to abrogate thrombocytopenia after multiple cycles of chemotherapy and to mobilize peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label study, 68 patients with advanced cancer were randomized to receive PEG-rHuMGDF subcutaneously at different doses and durations before administration of carboplatin 600 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 1,200 mg/m(2), and filgrastim 5 microgram/kg/d. PEG-rHuMGDF was not given after the first cycle of chemotherapy but was given after the second and subsequent cycles. Chemotherapy was given every 28 days for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

In patients who received the same dose of chemotherapy for at least two cycles, the platelet nadir was significantly higher (47.5 x 10(9)/L v 35.5 x 10(9)/L; P =.003) and duration of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia significantly shorter (0 v 3 days; P =.004) when PEG-rHuMGDF was administered after chemotherapy. There was no evidence of an effect of PEG-rHuMGDF when it was given before chemotherapy. Platelet recovery after the first cycle of chemotherapy was no different for different PEG-rHuMGDF regimens, and there was no difference between patients treated with PEG-rHuMGDF and historical controls treated with identical chemotherapy. There was a modest dose-related increase in progenitor cell levels after administration of PEG-rHuMGDF alone. Peak levels of PBPC occurred later in cycle 2 than in cycle 1 but were not different in magnitude.

CONCLUSION

PEG-rHuMGDF abrogated severe thrombocytopenia after dose-intensive chemotherapy. However, it had only a modest effect on progenitor cell levels and did not enhance progenitor cell mobilization after chemotherapy and filgrastim.

Strategies offering protection from the toxic effects of anticancer treatments with a focus on chemoprotective agents

Side effects associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy affect mainly a patient's quality of life. Means or agents designed to alleviate toxicities of anticancer treatments have been marketed or are under active investigation. In this paper, we review the reports published in this field in 1999.