Phase I and pharmacologic study of docetaxel and irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Borrowing strength with nonexchangeable priors over subpopulations

We introduce a nonparametric Bayesian model for a phase II clinical trial with patients presenting different subtypes of the disease under study. The objective is to estimate the success probability of an experimental therapy for each subtype. We consider the case when small sample sizes require extensive borrowing of information across subtypes, but the subtypes are not a priori exchangeable. The lack of a priori exchangeability hinders the straightforward use of traditional hierarchical models to implement borrowing of strength across disease subtypes. We introduce instead a random partition model for the set of disease subtypes. This is a variation of the product partition model that allows us to model a nonexchangeable prior structure. Like a hierarchical model, the proposed clustering approach considers all observations, across all disease subtypes, to estimate individual success probabilities. But in contrast to standard hierarchical models, the model considers disease subtypes a priori nonexchangeable. This implies that when assessing the success probability for a particular type our model borrows more information from the outcome of the patients sharing the same prognosis than from the others. Our data arise from a phase II clinical trial of patients with sarcoma, a rare type of cancer affecting connective or supportive tissues and soft tissue (e.g., cartilage and fat). Each patient presents one subtype of the disease and subtypes are grouped by good, intermediate, and poor prognosis. The prior model should respect the varying prognosis across disease subtypes. The practical motivation for the proposed approach is that the number of accrued patients within each disease subtype is small. Thus it is not possible to carry out a clinical study of possible new therapies for rare conditions, because it would be impossible to plan for sufficiently large sample size to achieve the desired power. We carry out a simulation study to compare the proposed model with a model that assumes similar success probabilities for all subtypes with the same prognosis, i.e., a fixed partition of subtypes by prognosis. When the assumption is satisfied the two models perform comparably. But the proposed model outperforms the competing model when the assumption is incorrect.

N0332 phase 2 trial of weekly irinotecan hydrochloride and docetaxel in refractory metastatic breast cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Trial

BACKGROUND

Because of the single-agent activity of irinotecan hydrochloride, combination of irinotecan and docetaxel treatment against metastatic breast cancer (MBC) should be evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Single-stage phase 2 study of irinotecan and docetaxel to evaluate tumor response, toxicity, time to progression, and overall survival was carried out. Regimen of docetaxel (25 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (70 mg/m(2)) was administered on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle. Patients had histologically confirmed breast adenocarcinoma and metastatic cancer measurable with RECIST.

RESULTS

Of 70 patients enrolled, 64 were assessable. Prior treatment with an anthracycline and a taxane was required. Eighteen (28%) patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 15% to 31%] had tumor response, plus four patients had stable disease (less than 30% decrease in sum of longest diameter and less than 20% increase) for >6 months. The clinical benefit rate was 34% overall. Median duration of tumor response was 6.7 months (95% CI 4.2-37.7 months); median follow-up was 18.6 months (range 8.5-37.7 months). The most common severe adverse events included fatigue [n = 16 (25%)] and neutropenia [n = 13 (20%)].

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly dosing of combination of irinotecan and docetaxel is active against MBC. However, the response rate to our regimen was not significantly better than single-agent docetaxel. Other schedules of irinotecan plus docetaxel should be considered for future studies.

Is irinotecan plus docetaxel useful as second-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

INTRODUCTION

The ability of doublet therapy in the second-line setting in patients with platinum-refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not yet been proven. In this setting, docetaxel (D) has shown efficacy and irinotecan (I) has only recently been introduced. This study was initiated to explore the activity and tolerability of three D + I regimens in platinum pretreated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

From March 2003 to June 2006, 65 patients (age range, 39-71 years; 83% male) with relapsed stage III/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either I 160 mg/m(2) plus D 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days (arm A), I 80 mg/m(2) on days 1,8 plus D 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 21 days (arm B), or I 60 mg/m(2) plus D 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 every 42 days (arm C), for a maximum of 18 weeks.

RESULTS

Per protocol analysis (47 of 65) overall response rates were 5.6% (A), 6.7% (B), and 7.1% (C). Median times to progression were 3.4, 4.0, and 4.3 months, respectively. Overall survival was 8.9 (A), 8.3 (B), and 9.4 (C) months. G3/4 neutropenia was more frequent in arms A (42%) and B (55%) whereas G3/4 nonhematologic toxicity was similarly prevalent in all arms, although diarrhea occurred in 47% of arm C patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent treatment with D or the multitarget antifolate pemetrexed or erlotinib remain the best choices and investigational studies, following first-line therapy, are required.

Excess toxicity associated with docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: results of a phase II study

BACKGROUND

No therapeutic standard of care exists for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who progress following first-line treatment with a gemcitabine-based regimen. There is evidence of synergistic activity between docetaxel and irinotecan, and the combination of these two agents has shown promising efficacy in the first-line setting for advanced pancreatic cancer. We, therefore, evaluated this regimen in patients with gemcitabine-refractory disease.

METHODS

Eligible patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were required to have an elevated serum CA19-9 (> 2x ULN) and exposure to one or two prior chemotherapy regimens, including one gemcitabine-based. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 65 mg/m2 and irinotecan 160 mg/m2, both administered every 21 days. Serum CA19-9 levels were measured at the start of each treatment cycle and CT scans performed after every two cycles.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled before the study was closed due to excess toxicity. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia/leukopenia, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea. Fully half of patients received only 1 treatment cycle, with a median time to treatment failure of 36 days. No objective responses were observed, although 3 patients had stable disease for at least 6 cycles. Overall survival for the entire cohort was 134 days, with a 6-month survival rate of 36%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel and irinotecan given on a 21-day cycle is associated with excess toxicity in gemcitabine-refractory patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Although select patients may benefit from treatment, the overall risk:benefit ratio is unfavorable, and other dosing regimens and therapeutic options should be explored in this setting.

Phase II study of biweekly administration of docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with refractory or relapsed advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We examined the safety and efficacy of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan administered biweekly in patients with refractory or relapsed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with previously treated NSCLC of stage III or IV were eligible if they had a performance status of 2 or less, were 75 years or younger, and had adequate organ function. From May 2003 through February 2006, 35 patients (27 men and 8 women; median age 64 years; age range 41-75 years) were enrolled. Patients were treated every 4 weeks with docetaxel (33 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 16) plus irinotecan (50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15). None of the 35 patients achieved a complete response, but five achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 14.3% (95% confidence interval, 4.8-30.3%). The median survival time was 8 months (range 2-29 months). The median time to progression was 3 months (range 1-12 months). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities included leukopenia in 48.6% of patients, neutropenia in 54.3%, and anemia in 25.7%. No patients had grade 3 to 4 diarrhea or nausea and vomiting. Although one patient had grade 3 drug-induced interstitial pneumonia, all side effects were manageable, and there were no treatment-related deaths. In conclusion, the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan administered biweekly is a safe and effective treatment for refractory or relapsed NSCLC. However, the search for even more active regimens should be continued.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel, irinotecan, and celecoxib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We studied the toxicities, potential pharmacokinetic interactions, and preliminary antitumor activity of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan with celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) with measurable disease, good performance status, and adequate end organ function. Docetaxel and irinotecan were administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, and their doses were escalated on successive patient cohorts at three dose levels: 30/50, 30/60, and 35/60 (doses in mg/m2). Celecoxib was administered at a starting dose of 400 mg orally twice daily without interruption, beginning on day 2 of cycle 1. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on day 1 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycle 2.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled and collectively received 78 cycles of therapy. Diarrhea was the most common toxicity; it was noted in 13 patients (76%). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred at dose level 1 (myocardial infarction in a patient with multiple coronary artery disease risk factors) and dose level 3 (grade 4 neutropenia with fatal urosepsis). Other major toxicities were: grade 3 neutropenia (2 patients); grade 3/4 diarrhea (3/1); grade 3 nausea (2); grade 2 rash (1); and grade 3 pneumonitis (1). The maximum tolerated dose was at dose level 3, i.e., docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, plus celecoxib 400 mg twice daily, repeated every 21 days. Five of 15 evaluable patients achieved an objective response. The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were not altered by celecoxib. However, we observed an 18% increase in the average elimination clearance of irinotecan coincident with the addition of celecoxib.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of celecoxib to docetaxel and irinotecan was generally well tolerated but unpredictable fatal toxicity occurred. Diarrhea was the most common toxicity. Antitumor activity was promising. The alteration of irinotecan pharmacokinetic parameters observed may not be clinically relevant.

[Construction of optimal combined chemotherapy of anti-tumor drugs based on chronotherapy]

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is almost always incurable, and the median survival is of the order on 18-24 months. Combination therapy with adriamycin (ADR) and docetaxel (DOC) is more effective against MBC than the previous therapy due to differences between their mechanisms. However, the combination of ADR and DOC induces severe adverse effects, limiting its clinical use in many patients with MBC. The biologic functions of most living organisms are organized along an approximate 24 h time cycle or circadian rhythm. Chronotherapy is defined as the administration of medications using biological rhythms to optimize the therapeutic outcomes and/or control adverse effects. To decrease adverse effects, many antitumor drugs have been particularly studied in humans and animals. The toxicities of ADR and DOC have also been found to depend on dosing-time in animals and humans. This study was to establish the most suitable dosing schedule to relieve severe adverse effects and improve antitumor effects by considering a chronopharmacological approach, dosing-interval and dosing-sequence to the combination chemotherapy of ADR and DOC in mice. In the results, we demonstrate that the dosing schedule based on dosing-sequence, dosing-interval and dosing-time not only significantly reduced leukopenia and toxic death but also significantly increased the inhibition rate of tumor growth compared with the dosing schedule without an interval between each injection, commonly used in clinical practice. These findings suggest that the therapeutic index of combined chemotherapy can be improved by choosing an optimal dosing-schedule (dosing-interval, dosing-sequence and dosing-time).

Phase II study of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: an Alpe-Adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary group study (ATOM 007)

This study was designed to evaluate the activity and tolerability of irinotecan and docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligibility included recurrent or progressive NSCLC, previous chemotherapy, age > or = 18 years, ECOG PS < or = 2. Treatment consisted of irinotecan (160 mg/m2 i.v.), followed by docetaxel (65 mg/m2 i.v.) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, for a maximum of 6 cycles. Forty patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years and median ECOG PS was 1. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 31 (78%) were evaluable for response. A total of 125 cycles was administered (median, 3; range, 1-6). Most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (62%), neutropenic fever (22%), and diarrhea (32%). Response rate was 10%; a further 40% of patients achieved stable disease. All responses were observed in patients with ECOG PS < or = 1, age <70 years, and who had received only one prior chemotherapy regimen. Median time to progression was 2.8 months and median survival was 7.4 months. Because of significant toxicity and limited activity, further investigation of irinotecan plus docetaxel in second line NSCLC is not recommended.

Front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with irinotecan and docetaxel: A multicentre phase II study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of the irinotecan plus docetaxel combination in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with irinotecan 200mg/m2 followed by docetaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m2) support from day 2 to 9. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A partial response was achieved in 9 (23%; 95% confidence interval 9.85-36.3%) patients; stable and progressive disease were observed in 10 (25.6%) and 20 (51.4%) patients, respectively. The median duration of response was 7.1 months and the median time to tumor progression 3 months. The median survival time was 10.8 months and the 1-year survival 42.2%. Four (10.3%) patients developed grade 4 neutropenia and all but one were complicated with fever; there was no treatment-related death. Nine (23.1%) patients developed grade 3 or 4 diarrhea while grade 2 or 3 fatigue occurred in nine (23.1%), and grade 3 mucositis in two (2.6%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of irinotecan/docetaxel is a relatively active non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimen with manageable toxicity, which could be given in an outpatient basis; this regimen merits to be further studied in order to improve its tolerance and evaluate its clinical relevance in patients who can not tolerate platinum-based doublets.

Biweekly docetaxel-irinotecan treatment with filgrastim support is highly active in antracycline-Paclitaxel-refractory breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and activity of combination treatment with docetaxel (DTX) and irinotecan (CPT-11), given together every other week, combined with filgrastim support, in anthracycline- and paclitaxel-pretreated breast cancer (BC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced BC patients pretreated with anthracycline- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible. DTX (80 mg/m2) and CPT-11 (100 mg/m2) were given biweekly with filgrastim support (300 microg/day on days 4-7).

RESULTS

Fifty patients (48 with metastatic and 2 with locally advanced cancer) were enrolled, with a total of 318 cycles being delivered. Thirty-one patients had visceral localizations. All patients had received epirubicin plus paclitaxel, with or without cisplatin, as front-line treatment for advanced disease. Overall, fatigue and diarrhea were the main chemotherapy-related toxicities in this study, being severe in 10 (20%) and 4 (8%) patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 (36%) and 6 (12%) patients, respectively. Red blood cell transfusions were required in 4 patients. A total of 32 objective responses were registered (overall response rate, ORR = 64%, 95% confidence interval = 49-77%), including 8 complete responses (16%). An additional 8 patients showed stable disease. After a median follow-up of 18 (range 4-29) months, 30 patients were still alive, and 19 were progression free; median progression-free and overall survivals were 10 and 23 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly DTX/CPT-11 with G-CSF support is a well-tolerated and highly effective approach in anthracycline-/paclitaxel-pretreated patients. The very promising ORR and survival outcome observed in this subset of patients with a poor prognosis suggest that this regimen might play a major role in the management of this disease.

A phase I trial of celecoxib in combination with docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE

This phase I study was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose of the combination of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, with docetaxel and irinotecan, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with solid tumors received one of three escalating dose levels of daily celecoxib in combination with docetaxel and irinotecan administered on days 1 and 8 of an every 21-day cycle. Toxicities were graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) and recorded as maximum grade per patient for each treatment cycle.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients received 90 cycles of treatment through three dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were nausea and diarrhea. The most common treatment-related toxicities in all cycles of treatment were alopecia, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anemia, anorexia, and edema.. The maximum tolerated dose was established at celecoxib 400 mg twice a day continuously, weekly docetaxel 30 mg/m2 and irinotecan 50 mg/m2 for 2 weeks every 21 days. Disease stabilization (five or more cycles) was documented in eight patients.

CONCLUSION

The combination of celecoxib with docetaxel and irinotecan did not ameliorate irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Although prolonged disease stabilization was achieved in some patients, we do not recommend combining celecoxib with docetaxel and irinotecan because of lack of activity and the side effect profile of this combination.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of docetaxel and irinotecan administered on a weekly schedule

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel and irinotecan are synergistic agents with a broad spectrum of activity but overlapping myelosuppression. The study was designed to maintain dose intensity while limiting myelosuppression. The objectives of this study were to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan administered weekly for four consecutive weeks every 42 days, to describe toxicities of this regimen, and to perform a pharmacokinetic analysis to evaluate changes in drug disposition as a function of dose as well as repeated dosing.

METHODS

Adult patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with docetaxel followed by irinotecan. Doses of 30/50, 35/50, 35/66, 30/57, 30/65, 30/80 mg/m(2), respectively, were studied. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel, irinotecan and SN-38 in plasma were determined on days 1 and 22 by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were treated. The MTD was docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) plus irinotecan 65 mg/m(2). Diarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity; myelosuppression and other non-hematological toxicities were uncommon and mild. There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters between day 1 and day 22 (n=20). Five objective responses (breast, stomach and unknown primary) were observed among 30 evaluable patients. In addition, eight patients achieved stable disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of weekly docetaxel and irinotecan is a well tolerated regimen and should be explored in phase II trials. This schedule maintains dose intensity and has limited myelosuppression.

A randomised phase II trial of docetaxel vs docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with stage IIIb-IV non-small-cell lung cancer who failed first-line treatment

Response rate and toxicity of second-line therapy with docetaxel (75 mg m⁻²) or docetaxel, irinotecan, and lenogastrim (60 mg m⁻², 200 mg m⁻², and 150 μg m⁻² day⁻¹, respectively) were compared in 108 patients with stage IIIb–IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Addition of irinotecan to docetaxel does not improve response rate, and increases gastrointestinal toxicity.

Comparison of docetaxel and docetaxel–irinotecan combination as second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether docetaxel (taxotere) treatment with or without irinotecan improved patient outcomes with similar toxicity in recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with recurrent platinum-refractory NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were randomized to either docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (day 1), both administered every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were randomized. The response rate (RR) (20% versus 14%), overall survival (6.5 months versus 6.4 months) and 1-year survival (37% versus 34%) were similar in the combination and docetaxel arms, respectively. The combination arm demonstrated a longer time to tumor progression (TTP) (5.6 versus 4.8 months; P=0.065). Grade 3-4 neutropenia and anemia were similar in the combination and docetaxel arms. Grades 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (except diarrhea) was mild and was similar in the two groups. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (17% versus 6%; P=0.04) and diarrhea (12% versus 3%; P=0.05) occurred more frequently in the combination arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of irinotecan with docetaxel in platinum-refractory NSCLC prolonged TTP, but did not improve significantly RR, median survival or 1-year survival. Second-line docetaxel monotherapy offers significant and reproducible efficacy in platinum-refractory NSCLC.

Salvage chemotherapy with mitomycin, docetaxel, and irinotecan (MDI regimen) in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase I and II trial

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and activity of mitomycin, docetaxel, and irinotecan (MDI) regimen on metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, previously treated with gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with less than 76 years, Karnofsky performance status > or = 60, and adequate bone marrow, kidney, and liver function were eligible for this trial. Treatment consisted of mitomycin 6 mg/m2 day 1, docetaxel and irinotecan on days 2 and 8 with escalating doses, every 4 weeks. Dose levels were level 1:30 and 70 mg/m2; level 2:30 and 100 mg/m2; level 3:30 and 85 mg/m2; and level 4:35 and 85 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 neutropenia > 7 days, febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, or diarrhea, grade > or = 3 nonhematological toxicity, or failure to recover to grade < or = 1 toxicity by day 43, occurring during the first cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Between September 2001 and October 2002, 15 eligible patients, three of whom had been previously treated with two lines of chemotherapy, received 33 cycles of MDI. Toxicity consisted of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia in 23% of cycles, fatigue, diarrhea, and vomiting in 10% of cycles, and one toxic death. DLT was observed in 2 of 6 level 2 patients (one toxic death and one grade 3 fatigue), and 2 of 3 level 4 patients (one neutropenic fever and one grade 3 fatigue). Thirteen patients were assessable for response. No objective response was observed among patients treated with MTD or higher doses. Three patients had stable disease; all other patients had progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression and median survival was 1.7 and 6.1 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MTD was mitomycin 6 mg/m2 day one, and docetaxel 30 and irinotecan 85 mg/m2 days 2 and 8. This regimen is inactive in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Biweekly administration of 24-h infusion of irinotecan followed by a 1-h infusion of docetaxel: a phase I study

We developed a chemotherapy combination regimen based on preclinical data suggesting synchronization of cancer cells in G2/M phase when exposed to irinotecan over a protracted period. This phase I study aimed to determine the toxicity spectrum, and define the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended optimal dose (ROD) of irinotecan infused over 24 h and followed by a 1-h infusion of 30 mg/m2 docetaxel. Starting dose for irinotecan was 30 mg/m2 and escalation proceeded at 30 mg/m2 increments, in cohorts of three to six patients until the MTD was reached. A dose between the MTD and the previous level was explored to further define the ROD. Thirty-two patients with advanced refractory cancers (median age 64, 19 male) received 190 treatment courses at five dosing levels of irinotecan: 30 mg/m2 (n=6 patients), 60 (n=3), 90 (n=7), 120 (n=8) and 105 (n=8). The MTD and ROD was 120/30 and 105/30 mg/m2. DLTs were diarrhea and neutropenia. Antitumor activity was modest. The ROD of biweekly administration of 24-h irinotecan followed by 1-h docetaxel is 105 and 30 mg/m2, respectively. The low hematological toxicity and modest activity observed leave questions concerning the optimal timing of this combination.

Phase I study of docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The role of non-platinum combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not yet been clarified. In this phase I study, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and the antitumor activity of a two-drug combination of docetaxel (DCT) and irinotecan (CPT) in patients with advanced NSCLC were evaluated. Previously untreated patients with NSCLC in stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or stage IV were eligible. Both drugs were administered by 1-h intravenous infusion on day 1, and repeated every 3 weeks. DCT was given before CPT administration. Five escalating dose levels of DCT/CPT (40/135, 50/135, 50/150, 60/150, and 60/165 mg/m2) were studied. Eighteen patients received 44 courses. The DLT was considered to be neutropenia, because grade 4 neutropenia lasting for 3 days or more was observed in three patients, which was accompanied with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. As a non-hematological toxicity, grade 3 diarrhea occurred in three patients. Since all the three patients treated at the fifth dose level (DCT at 60 mg/m2 and CPT at 165 mg/m2) experienced DLT (grade 4 neutropenia in two patients and grade 3 hepatic toxicity in one), this dose level was determined to be the MTD. The objective response rate was 33.3%, and the median survival time was 13.6 months. To confirm the effectiveness of this combination for advanced NSCLC which was suggested in the present study, a phase II study with the recommended doses (150 mg/m2 for CPT and 50-60 mg/m2 for DCT) is warranted.

Lung Cancer: A Cost and Outcome Study Based on Physician Practice Patterns

Chemotherapy is now an acceptable treatment for selected patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. With the wide assortment of cytotoxic and supportive-care drugs, there are opportunities for assessing the value of various treatment approaches. This study was undertaken to assess variations in treatment patterns in a large oncology group with emphasis on costs incurred and survival. A total of 1215 patients seen in 1996 by Medical Oncologists (a community-based private practice) were identified as new lung cancer patients by review of billing data. Of these, 858 received chemotherapy and were evaluated for charges. Three hundred were evaluated for charges, hospice care, and survival. Differences in practice patterns for physicians and the causes of those differences were assessed. Differences in survival, charges, and hospice care for those patients who were seen by high-charge and low-charge physicians were measured. Clear differences emerged in practice patterns for these Medical Oncologists. Higher charges were associated with higher average number of chemotherapy cycles given, greater use of second- and third-line chemotherapy and greater use of support drugs, particularly G-CSF and erythropoietin. For stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer, there was no difference in survival or in hospice utilization for the two groups. For all patients combined, there was no significant survival difference. There may be as much as 100% difference in costs incurred for lung cancer chemotherapy based on variations in practice patterns alone without a measurable survival difference. These results suggest approaches for cost-minimization and disease management. These suggestions have been reinforced by recent clinical data and guideline development.

Irinotecan and taxane combinations for non small-cell lung cancer

Based on nonoverlapping toxicity profiles and at least additive cytotoxicity in preclinical models, chemo-therapy regimens have been developed that feature the combination of irinotecan and a taxane drug. In the first study, the optimal doses of paclitaxel and irinotecan were 75 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, when chemotherapy was administered weekly for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest. The dose-limit-ing toxicity for this regimen was neutropenia, and the most prominent nonhematologic toxicities were mild diarrhea and fatigue. Pharmacokinetic studies failed to demonstrate any sequence-dependent interaction be-tween these agents on the metabolism of irinotecan or its major metabolite. This regimen has been modified, with chemotherapy given on day 1 and day 8 every 3 weeks, and is being tested further in previously un-treated advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a second trial, irinotecan was combined with docetaxel on a weekly schedule. When chemotherapy was given weekly for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest, the recommended doses of docetaxel and irinotecan were 35 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively. Low-grade gastrointestinal toxicity and asthenia were the dose-limiting toxicities. The treatment schedule was modified, with chemotherapy given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and patients are currently being treated with docetaxel 35 mg/m2 and irinotecan 65 mg/m2. Among the 10 evaluable patients with NSCLC in this second study, there was one partial response lasting 24 weeks and four patients with stable disease, including one patient who had progressive disease on a prior paclitaxel-containing regimen. The combinations of irinotecan and a taxane on a weekly schedule are active and well tolerated and deserve further evaluation in the treatment of NSCLC.

Randomised phase II study of docetaxel/cisplatin vs docetaxel/irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group Study (WJTOG9803)

Docetaxel plus cisplatin and docetaxel plus irinotecan are active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A randomised phase II study compared their efficacy and toxicity in 108 patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC, who were randomised to receive docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 80 mg m(-2) on day 1 (DC; n=51), or docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) on day 8 and irinotecan 60 mg m(-2) on day 1 and 8 (DI; n=57) every 3 weeks. Response rates were 37% for DC and 32% for DI patients. Median survival times and 1- and 2-year survival rates were 50 weeks (95% confidence interval: 34-78 weeks), 47 and 25% for DC, and 46 weeks (95% confidence interval: 37-54 weeks), 40 and 18% for DI, respectively. The progression-free survival time was 20 weeks (95% confidence interval: 14-25 weeks) with DC and 18 (95% confidence interval: 12-22 weeks) with DI. Significantly more DI than DC patients had grade 4 leucopenia and neutropenia (P<0.01); more DC patients had grade >/=2 thrombocytopenia (P<0.01). Nausea and vomiting was more pronounced with DC (P<0.01); diarrhoea was more common with DI (P=0.01). Three treatment-related deaths occurred in DC patients. In conclusion, although the DI and DC regimens had different toxicity profiles, there was no significant difference in survival.

Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel and irinotecan in metastatic malignant melanoma

AIM

The aim of the current trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of 3-weekly intravenous docetaxel and irinotecan in the treatment of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with no history of previous cytotoxic agents or immunological treatment for advanced disease were treated with docetaxel 50 mg/m2 and irinotecan 150 mg/m2 intravenously over 60 min every 21 days. Prior immunotherapy with interferon and chemotherapy for adjuvant therapies were accepted provided there was a minimum 4-week treatment-free interval. Response evaluation was performed after two cycles.

RESULTS

None of the patients had chemotherapy-induced tumour response. Eight patients achieved stable disease and others had progression of disease. The median survival time was 136 days (95% CI: 30.2-241.8), and the 3-month survival rate was 62.5%. Patients with stable disease (n = 8) had a longer survival than non-responders (P = 0.023, Breslow test). Generally side effects were mild and tolerable. Grade III-IV haematological toxicity occurred in approximately 10%. Severe emesis, stomatitis and diarrhoea was seen in less than 20% of the patients. Alopecia was observed in all patients.

CONCLUSION

A 3-weekly intravenous docetaxel and irinotecan combination appears to be inactive in the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma and has not been recommended.

Phase I study of weekly CPT-11 (irinotecan)/docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

Based on the synergistic cytotoxicity demonstrated in vitro by topoisomerase I inhibitors followed by docetaxel and the feasibility of giving both drugs on a weekly schedule avoiding overlapping toxicities, we designed a phase I trial of weekly CPT-11 (irinotecan)/docetaxel to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination. Eighteen patients with advanced solid tumors treated with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were included in this trial. CPT-11 was administered as a 90-min (intravenous) IV infusion followed immediately by docetaxel as a 30-min IV infusion. Both drugs were given on days 1, 8 and 15 in 4-week cycles. Four escalating dose levels of CPT-11/docetaxel (level I: 60/20 mg/m(2), level II: 60/25 mg/m(2), level III: 70/25 mg/m(2), and level IV: 70/30 mg/m(2)) were studied. Forty-seven cycles were administered (range, 1-5 courses) with a median number of 2.6 cycles per patient. Grade 4 leukopenia was the DLT reached at dose-level IV (CPT-11/docetaxel 70/30 mg/m(2)). Four patients had grade 3 anemia at dose levels III (two patients) and IV (two patients), while grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was not seen. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea in two patients (dose levels II and IV), grade 3 asthenia in one patient (dose level II) and grade 3 stomatitis in one patient (dose level I). The recommended dose of this weekly schedule is CPT-11 70 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 25 mg/m(2). DLT of this regimen is leukopenia, although toxicity is manageable at the recommended dose level. The activity of this regimen is being evaluated in a phase II study in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Weekly chemotherapy with carboplatin, docetaxel and irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer: a phase II study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin, docetaxel plus irinotecan given weekly to patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 50 patients with previously untreated NSCLC (stage IIIB 10; stage IV 40; 44% squamous cell carcinoma; median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status 1) received intravenous (i.v.) carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every 5 weeks. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 150 ug/m(2) was given from days 3 to 6 and 10 to 13. Response was evaluated every two cycles. Four complete responses (8%) and 24 (48%) partial responses were observed, giving an overall intent-to-treat response rate of 56%. 8 patients (16%) achieved stable disease and 14 (28%) progressed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 9.6 months (range 2.5-21.8 months), median survival was 14.8 months (range 0.3-27+ months) and actuarial 1-year survival time was 55%. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 and 22% of patients, respectively; 13 patients (26%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia and 7 (14%) had neutropenic fever that required hospitalisation, but was successfully treated with antibiotics and G-CSF support. One patient developed a severe allergy during docetaxel administration and was withdrawn. Other grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhoea (n=14; 3 required hospitalisation), nausea/vomiting (n=9), neurotoxicity (n=5) and fatigue (n=5). 6 patients required a dose reduction. This combination of i.v. carboplatin AUC 2, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) given weekly is highly effective in the treatment of chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC. Toxicity was moderate, but manageable.

The Role of Docetaxel in Nonplatinum-Based Combination Chemotherapy for non—small-Cell Lung Cancer

A number of newer chemotherapeutic agents including docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan, and vinorelbine have demonstrated substantial activity in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their palliative role as single agents and in combination with platinum has been well defined in NSCLC. More recently, combining these agents without platinum has been the primary objective of numerous worldwide clinical trials. Two of these docetaxel/nonplatinum-based combinations have demonstrated comparable activity to platinum-based regimens in randomized trials. While platinum-based chemotherapy remains an important therapy for treatment of NSCLC, nonplatinum combinations may be a reasonable alternative for patients. These docetaxel/nonplatinum combinations warrant further evaluation in randomized trials to define their optimal role as standard therapy for NSCLC.