Results of a prospective trial of mantle irradiation alone for selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease

Long-term results of a prospective trial of mantle irradiation alone for early-stage Hodgkin's disease

BACKGROUND

To determine the long-term treatment outcome and late effects of mantle irradiation alone in selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2000, 87 patients with pathologic stage (Ann Arbor) I-IIA or clinical stage IA Hodgkin's disease were entered on to a prospective trial of mantle irradiation alone. Patients with B symptoms, large mediastinal adenopathy, or subcarinal or hilar involvement were excluded. The median doses to the mantle field and mediastinum were 36 Gy (range 30.3-40) and 38.6 Gy (range 30.6-44), respectively. The actuarial freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 107 months (range 23-192). Thirteen of 87 patients (15%) relapsed at a median of 30 months (range 5-62). The 5- and 10-year actuarial FFTF rates were 86% and 84.7%, respectively. All 13 patients who relapsed are alive without evidence of disease at a median of 84 months (range 30-156) post-salvage therapy. Five patients developed a second malignancy at a median of 93 months (range 27-131). The 10-year actuarial risk of a second malignancy was 4.5%. There have been two deaths to date, both due to second malignancies. The 10-year OS rate was 98.2%.

CONCLUSION

In selected patients with early-stage Hodgkin's disease, mantle irradiation alone has an excellent long-term survival rate, comparing favorably with the previous standard treatment of extended-field radiation therapy and the current standard of combined modality therapy.

Elevated serum levels of IL-10 are associated with inferior progression-free survival in patients with Hodgkin's disease treated with radiotherapy

Elevated pretreatment serum interleukin-10 (IL-10) is associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) treated with ABVD or equivalent regimens. Therefore, we explored the association of serum IL-10 with presenting features and PFS in HD patients treated only by radiotherapy (RT) with curative intent. Eligible patients were previously untreated, had biopsy-proven HD, were older than 16 years, HIV-negative, and had unthawed pretreatment serum. Serum IL-10 levels were measured with ELISA and were considered high if > or = 10 pg/ml. We identified 69 patients with median age of 34 years (range 16 - 74), of who 52% were males, and 3% had B-symptoms. Ann Arbor Stage was I in 35%, II in 58%, and III in 7% of the patients. Histology was lymphocyte predominance in 26%, and classical HD in 74% of the patients. Serum IL-10 was elevated in 35% of the patients. After a median follow-up of 67 months for survivors, the 5-year PFS of patients with high vs. normal serum IL-10 was 50% vs. 81% (all patients, P = 0.006), and 43% vs. 77% for the subset with classical HD (P = 0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that high serum IL-10 and beta2-microglobulin were independently associated with inferior PFS. Patients with none, 1, or 2 adverse features comprised 57%, 36%, and 7% of the population, and their 5-year PFS was 80%, 63%, and 0%, respectively (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, high serum IL-10 is independently associated with inferior PFS in patients with HD treated with RT.

A Consensus Protocol: Image-improved Therapeutic Guidelines for Limited Adult Hodgkin's Disease

Hodgkin's disease (HD) has greatly benefited from new technologies in terms of less invasive and more accurate staging as well as improved overall and relapse-free survival. However, the likelihood of late adverse effects of treatment, including second tumors, has increased due to the longer survival of patients with HD. Today's trend is to aim at minimal therapeutic exposure while guaranteeing lower therapy-related morbidity. This encourages new research efforts but also leads to less uniformity in treatments, as observed in the Veneto Region in Italy. The Gruppo Veneto Linfomi, composed of representatives of Radiotherapy and Oncology Departments of the Veneto Region, has been analyzing this problem and proposing therapy guidelines since 1995. A set of 10 prognostic factors has been developed to identify three prognostic groups: highly favorable (HF) are patients up to 40 years of age presenting with stage I disease involving only one site of disease with a maximum tumor diameter (TD) of 5 cm and no adverse factors. In this group only mantle field irradiation is recommended if the disease is located in the neck or above, inverted-Y irradiation is recommended for distal subdiaphragmatic lesions, and subtotal nodal irradiation in all other cases. HF cases may also be treated like favorable cases with limited chemoradiation. Favorable (F) cases are patients in stage I with a TD greater than 5 cm and smaller than 10 cm or stage II, up to three sites of disease and negative prognostic factors for systemic disease. All other patients are included in the “not favorable” (NF) group at Ann Arbor stage I or II with any adverse prognostic factor. For the latter two groups, chemotherapy with the ABVD or Stanford V regimen precedes involved-field radiotherapy to sites with a TD of at least 5 cm. The total irradiation dose is determined by local disease extent and level of response to chemotherapy. Images on which the radiation fields are drawn serve as an important reference to improve the homogeneity of treatments. This protocol includes a list of adverse treatment effects (chemo- and/or radiotherapy) together with follow-up guidelines for the early detection of secondary cancers in previously irradiated patients.

Radiotherapy alone for lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's disease

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to analyze the results with radiotherapy alone in a select group of asymptomatic adults with nonbulky, early-stage lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1963 and 1995, 36 patients with nonbulky stage IA (N = 27) or IIA (N = 9) supradiaphragmatic (N = 27) or subdiaphragmatic (N = 9) lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's disease were treated with radiotherapy alone. Eleven of the patients underwent laparotomy. Limited-field radiotherapy involving only one side of the diaphragm and extended-field radiotherapy encompassing both sides of the diaphragm were used in 28 and 8 cases, respectively. Median dose to involved areas was 40.0 Gy given daily in 20 2.0-Gy fractions. Salvage treatmentconsisted of MOPP (mechlorethamine, vincristine, prednisone, procarbazine), CVPP/ABDIC (cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, procarbazine and prednisone/doxorubicin, bleomycin, dacarbazine, lomustine, and prednisone), or ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) chemotherapy and/or involved-field radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 8.8 years (range, 3.0-34.4 years). None of the 15 patients with supradiaphragmatic disease who received limited-field radiotherapy to regions that did not include the mediastinal or hilar nodes subsequently experienced relapse there. Only one of 20 patients who received supradiaphragmatic limited-field radiotherapy alone experienced relapse in the paraaortic nodes or spleen. The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates for the 20 patients with stage IA lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's disease treated with involved-field or regional radiotherapy were 95% and 100%, respectively. There were no cases of severe or life-threatening cardiac toxicity. No solid tumors have been observed in-field in patients treated with limited-field radiotherapy, even though they have been followed up longer than those treated with extended-field radiotherapy (median follow-up, 11.6 vs 5.5 years); two solid tumors have developed in-field in patients who received extended-field radiotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Involved-field or regional radiotherapy alone may be adequate in stage IA lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's disease patients. Longer follow-up will help to more clearly define the risks of cardiac toxicity and solid tumors that result from involved-field or regional radiotherapy, which appear to be low based on follow-up to date.

Changing role and decreasing size: current trends in radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease

Radiotherapy, the first cancer treatment modality that offered cure, is still considered to be the most effective "single agent" in treating Hodgkin's disease (HD). Yet, the role of radiotherapy in HD has changed dramatically with the advent of effective combination chemotherapy and the rising concern of long-term complications associated with successful treatment of HD. The new principles of integrating radiotherapy into a combined-modality regimen for HD at different prognostic stages are reviewed here, along with the effect of this new role on radiation field size and design.

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte very favorable and favorable, lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin disease

BACKGROUND

Lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin disease (LPHD) is rare and has a natural history different from that of classic Hodgkin disease. There is little information in the literature regarding the role of chemotherapy in patients with early-stage LPHD. The objective of this study was to examine recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and patterns of first recurrence in patients with LPHD who were treated with radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy.

METHODS

From 1963 to 1996, 48 consecutive patients ages 16-49 years (median, 28 years) with Ann Arbor Stage I (n = 30 patients) or Stage II (n = 18 patients), very favorable (VF; n = 5 patients) or favorable (F; n = 43 patients) LPHD, according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (EORTC-GELA) criteria, received radiotherapy alone (n = 37 patients) or received chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (n = 11 patients). The percentages of patients with VF disease (11% vs. 9% in the radiotherapy group vs. the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group, respectively) or F disease (89% vs. 91%, respectively) within the two treatment groups were similar (P = 1.00). A median of three cycles of chemotherapy with mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (MOPP) or with mitoxantrone, vincristine, vinblastine, and prednisone (NOVP) was given initially to six patients and five patients, respectively. A median total radiotherapy dose of 40 grays (Gy) given in daily fractions of 2.0 Gy was delivered to both treatment groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 9.3 years, and 98% of patients were observed for > or = 3.0 years. RFS was similar for patients who were treated with radiotherapy alone and patients who were treated with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (10-year survival rates: 77% and 68%, respectively; P = 0.89). The OS rate also was similar for the two groups (10-year survival rates: 90% and 100%, respectively; P = 0.43). MOPP or NOVP chemotherapy did not reduce the risk of recurrence outside of the radiotherapy fields.

CONCLUSIONS

MOPP or NOVP chemotherapy did not improve RFS or OS significantly in patients with VF or F LPHD, although the statistical power was limited. Ongoing clinical trials will help to clarify the role of a watch-and-wait strategy or systemic therapy, including anthracycline (epirubicin or doxorubicin), bleomycin, and vinblastine-based chemotherapy or antibody-based approaches, in the treatment of these patients.