Metastatic Osteosarcoma: A Curable Advanced Malignancy

Mitoxantrone-iron oxide biodistribution in blood, tumor, spleen, and liver--magnetic nanoparticles in cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Magnetic drug targeting is a new treatment principle for tumors using cytostatics coupled to ferromagnetic nanoparticles and extracorporeal magnets. Higher concentrations in tumor tissue with lower systemic concentrations and without damage of healthy organs should be achieved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

n = 42 adult Wag/Rij rats were transfected with rhabdomyosarcoma R(1)H in their right gastrocnemius muscle. In the biodistribution trial (n = 36) concentrations of mitoxantrone-iron oxide with and without an extracorporeal 0.6 tesla magnet and regular mitoxantrone were measured in plasma and tumor tissue for one- and two-dose administration. In the plasma iron trial (n = 6) iron concentrations were measured in plasma before, during, and up to 30 min after drug administration. Seven days after the trial liver, spleen and tumor samples were obtained and histologically assessed.

RESULTS

Mitoxantrone iron-oxide concentration in plasma was significantly (P < 0.05) lower when a magnet was placed over the tumor area and as low as uncoupled mitoxantrone. Mitoxantrone concentration in tumor tissue was always significantly higher with magnetic drug targeting when compared with uncoupled mitoxantrone. Two doses resulted in drug accumulation in tumor tissue. Plasma iron concentrations rose when the drug was first administered. Plasma levels fell below the starting level with a magnet applied. A rebound phenomenon with rising iron concentrations was observed after the magnet was removed. Tumors showed fresh necrosis and liver and spleen had detectable iron depositions but no necrosis 7 d after treatment. No allergies or toxic reactions were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that magnetic drug targeting achieves higher concentrations of cytostatics in tumor tissue compared with blood. During magnetic drug targeting, iron particles are quickly sliced and kept in the tumor area. Organs of the reticuloendothelial system are not affected by cytostatic damage.

Immunoexpression of Ezrin and CD44 in patients with osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Metastasis is an important prognostic factor among patients with osteosarcoma. It has been reported that ezrin is important in enabling metastasis and that CD44 expression leads to functional increases in ezrin activation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to correlate ezrin and CD44 expression with prognosis.

SAMPLES AND METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of osteosarcoma who had been treated at Hospital de Cancer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brazil, between 2000 and 2005 were selected from the Hospital Tumor Registry. Fifty-two patients and, among these, 34 surgical biopsy specimens of osteosarcoma before chemotherapy were reviewed by the Pathology Department. Ezrin and CD44H protein expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry on the initial biopsy for these 34 samples.

RESULTS

Most patients (76%) were ezrin-positive in cytoplasm and membrane (38.2%); 58.9% presented high-intensity staining and 50.0% had high scores. Half of the patients were CD44H-positive, predominantly in cytoplasm (38.2%); 20.6% presented staining in more than 50% of the cells. None of the markers showed associations with any of the clinicopathologic variables studied. Among the ezrin-positive patients, the 5-year survival rate was 12.8%, whereas it was 41.7% among ezrin-negative patients (P=0.121). The interaction between ezrin and poor histologic response among nonmetastatic patients showed an association with relapse-free 5-year survival of 100% versus 12.7% (P=0.042). The overall survival rates for CD44-positive and negative patients were similar (21.5% and 25.3%, respectively) (P=0.676).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither CD44H nor ezrin immunoexpression could predict the prognosis for patients with osteosarcoma in our small sample.