Split-dose docetaxel, cisplatin and leucovorin/fluorouracil as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: results of a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Phase II and III trials of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) have shown superior efficacy versus cisplatin and fluorouracil alone but high rates of hematologic toxicity in advanced gastric cancer. To reduce toxicity while maintaining the efficacy of DCF, we investigated split doses of docetaxel (T), cisplatin (P), leucovorin (L) and fluorouracil (F).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric-/esophageal adenocarcinomas received T 50 mg/m(2) and P 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 15 and 29 and L 500 mg/m(2) plus F 2000 mg/m(2) weekly, every 8 weeks. Because significant dose reductions to <80% became necessary in 80% of patients, the regimen was amended after the first 15 patients to T 40 mg/m(2), P 40 mg/m(2), L 200 mg/m(2) and F 2000 mg/m(2). The primary endpoint was response rate.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled: 24 had locally advanced (LA) tumors and 36 had metastatic disease. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (22%), febrile neutropenia (5%), diarrhea (20%) and lethargy (18%). The overall response rate was 47%. Twenty-three LA patients underwent secondary surgical resection (96%); complete resection was achieved in 87%. Overall, median time to progression and overall survival were 9.4 and 17.9 months, respectively (8.1 and 15.1 months, respectively, for patients with metastatic disease).

CONCLUSION

T-PLF regimen is highly active and has a favorable toxicity profile.

Docetaxel in the treatment of gastric cancer

Docetaxel is part of the standard chemotherapy in breast, non-small cell lung cancer and androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer and has recently been approved for advanced gastric cancer. It demonstrated promising single-agent efficacy in gastric cancer and was therefore investigated in different combination regimens. The combination of docetaxel with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), capecitabine, irinotecan or cisplatin demonstrated high efficacy. The triple combination of docetaxel/cisplatin and 5-FU (DCF) was investigated in randomized Phase II trials and a randomized Phase III study (TAX325). In TAX325, DCF demonstrated superiority in terms of time to tumor progression, response rate and survival against a cisplatin/5-FU combination. Docetaxel was therefore approved for advanced gastric cancer by the US FDA and the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products and will evolve as an integral part of routine combination regimens against gastric cancer. This review will discuss and interpret the different Phase II and III trials of docetaxel in gastric cancer.

Cancer of the gastroesophageal junction: Current therapy options

Active chemotherapy agents in metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus include taxanes (docetaxel or paclitaxel), 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, platinum drugs (including cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and carboplatin), and anthracyclines. Conventional chemotherapy combines infusional 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin. The addition of a third drug to this backbone results in greater toxicity and only marginal improvements in outcome. Alternative and potentially better-tolerated chemotherapy involves two-drug regimens, combining 5-fluorouracil with a taxane or irinotecan, or combining a platinum drug with irinotecan or a taxane. Although preoperative chemotherapy improves survival compared with surgery alone, the addition of radiation therapy to chemotherapy preoperatively improves rates of curative resection, reduces local tumor recurrence, and achieves a significant rate of pathologic complete response. Combined preoperative chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy is the preferred preoperative strategy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Survival is improved with postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy if none has been delivered preoperatively.

Correlation between tumor response to first-line chemotherapy and prognosis in advanced gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

In advanced gastric cancer, the relationship between tumor response and prognosis is far from clear.

METHODS

We performed a pooled analysis on published data from 4593 patients in 25 randomized trials of first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. A weighed analysis was used to investigate the correlation between objective response rate (RR) and time to progression (TTP) and overall survival time (OS).

RESULTS

A moderate correlation was found between RR and TTP and OS (r = 0.49 and r = 0.45, respectively) in all 25 trials. In treatment arms without new drugs including irinotecan, taxanes, or oxaliplatin, RR also was associated with TTP and OS (r = 0.56 and r = 0.47, respectively). However, no association between RR and OS was found, whereas there was a moderate correlation between RR and TTP (r = 0.41) in treatment arms using new drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that response to treatment was related to TTP and OS. The potential role of objective response as a surrogate in chemotherapy trials of advanced gastric cancer warrants further investigation, especially with regard to treatment with new drugs.

Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

Randomized phase II and III clinical trials on first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer were identified by electronic searches of Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and Cancerlit; hand searches of relevant abstract books and reference lists; and contact to experts. Meta-analysis was performed using the fixed-effect model. Overall survival, reported as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI, was the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Analysis of chemotherapy versus best supportive care (HR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.52) and combination versus single agent, mainly fluorouracil (FU) -based chemotherapy (HR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.93) showed significant overall survival benefits in favor of chemotherapy and combination chemotherapy, respectively. In addition, comparisons of FU/cisplatin-containing regimens with versus without anthracyclines (HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95) and FU/anthracycline-containing combinations with versus without cisplatin (HR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.91) both demonstrated a significant survival benefit for the three-drug combination. Comparing irinotecan-containing versus nonirinotecan-containing combinations (mainly FU/cisplatin) resulted in a nonsignificant survival benefit in favor of the irinotecan-containing regimens (HR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.06), but they have never been compared against a three-drug combination.

CONCLUSION

Best survival results are achieved with three-drug regimens containing FU, an anthracycline, and cisplatin. Among these, regimens including FU as bolus exhibit a higher rate of toxic deaths than regimens using a continuous infusion of FU, such as epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous-infusion FU.

Irofulven as first line therapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II multicenter study by the Cancer Therapeutics Research Group (CTRG)

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of irofulven, a DNA interacting acylfulvene analog, as first line therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer received irofulven at a dose of 0.45 mg/kg administered intravenously over 30-min infusion (up to a maximum of 50 mg), on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles delivered per patient was 2 (range 1-6). Two patients (9%) had >or= 1-week delay in administration of subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. For the day 8 chemotherapy, dose reductions were required in seven patients (30%); dose omitting occurred in five patients (22%). Grade 3/4 anemia and neutropenia occurred in 22 and 17% of patients, respectively. There was no grade 4 thrombocytopenia and no neutropenic fever was observed. Of the 20 evaluable patients, there were no responses observed, 3 patients had stable disease after 2 cycles of treatment which was not confirmed by a further assessment. Median overall survival was 6.05 months (95% CI 4.55-9.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Irofulven was tolerated at the dose of 0.45 mg/kg on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks but showed no evidence of antitumor activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Chemotherapy as a component of multimodal therapy for gastric carcinoma

Prognosis of locally advanced gastric cancer remains poor, and several multimodality strategies involving surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation have been tested in clinical trials. Phase III trial testing the benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy over treatment with surgery alone have revealed little impact on survival, with the exception of some small trials in Western nations. A large trial from the United States exploring postoperative chemoradiation was the first major success in this category. Results from Japanese trials suggest that moderate chemotherapy with oral fluoropyrimidines may be effective against less-advanced (T2-stage) cancer, although another confirmative trial is needed to prove this point. Investigators have recently turned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and some promising results have been reported from phase II trials using active drug combinations. In 2005, a large phase III trial testing pre- and postoperative chemotherapy has proven its survival benefit for resectable gastric cancer. Since the rate of pathologic complete response is considered to affect treatment results of this strategy, neoadjuvant chemoradiation that further increases the incidence of pathologic complete response could be a breakthrough, and phase III studies testing this strategy may be warranted in the near future.

Evolving chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer and is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. More than 50% of patients undergo surgery, but even after a curative resection, 60% of patients relapse locally or with distant metastases. Despite the fact that many advances have occurred in the management of gastric cancer, it continues to carry a poor prognosis, amplifying the importance of palliative chemotherapy. When compared with best supportive care alone, combination chemotherapy yields a significant advantage in the management of advanced gastric cancer. However, no single regimen has emerged or been accepted as clearly superior over another. Numerous phase II studies have demonstrated promising results with newer agents including irinotecan, docetaxel, capecitabine, S-1, and oxaliplatin. Recently reported phase III results with these agents now demonstrate positive developments in the treatment options for patients with advanced gastric cancer.