Concurrent administration of high-dose rituximab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

Mechanisms of Resistance to Rituximab Used for the Treatment of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases

Autoimmune blistering diseases represent a group of chronic severe, disabling, and potentially fatal disorders of the skin and/or mucous membranes, primarily mediated by pathogenic auto-antibodies. Despite their rarity, these diseases are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and profound negative impact on the patient's quality of life and impose a considerable economic burden. Rituximab, an anti-CD-20 monoclonal antibody, represents the first line of therapy for pemphigus, regardless of severity and a valuable off-label therapeutic alternative for subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases as it ensures high rates of rapid, long-lasting complete remission. Nevertheless, disease recurrence is the rule, all patients requiring maintenance therapy with rituximab eventually. While innate resistance to rituximab in pemphigus patients is exceptional, acquired resistance is frequent and may develop even in patients with initial complete response to rituximab, representing a real challenge for physicians. We discuss the various resistance mechanisms and their complex interplay, as well as the numerous therapeutic alternatives that may be used to circumvent rituximab resistance. As no therapeutic measure is universally efficient, individualization of rituximab treatment regimen and tailored adjuvant therapies in refractory autoimmune blistering diseases are mandatory.

A paradox of choice: Sequencing therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The available treatments for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have experienced a dramatic change since 2017. Incremental advances in basic and translational science over several decades have led to innovations in immune-oncology. These innovations have culminated in eight separate approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL over the last 10 years. High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients who relapse after an initial remission. For transplant-ineligible patients or for those who relapse following HDT-ASCT, multiple options exist. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD19, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, immune effector cell products, and other agents with novel mechanisms of action are now available for patients with R/R DLBCL. There is increasing use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells as second-line therapy for patients with early relapse of DLBCL or those who are refractory to initial chemoimmunotherapy. The clinical benefits of these strategies vary and are influenced by patient and disease characteristics, as well as the type of prior therapy administered. Therefore, there are multiple clinical scenarios that clinicians might encounter when treating R/R DLBCL. An optimal sequence of drugs has not been established, and there is no evidence-based consensus on how to best order these agents. This abundance of choices introduces a paradox: proliferating treatment options are initially a boon to patients and providers, but as choices grow further they no longer liberate. Rather, more choices make the management of R/R DLBCL more challenging due to lack of direct comparisons among agents and a desire to maximize patient outcomes. Here, we provide a review of recently-approved second- and subsequent-line agents, summarize real-world data detailing the use of these medicines, and provide a framework for sequencing therapy in R/R DLBCL.

Clinical relevance of MYC/BCL2 expression and cell of origin in patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma treated with autologous transplant

Dual expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins (double-expressor lymphoma [DEL]) as well as cell of origin (COO) are important prognostic factors in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after conventional chemotherapy. We studied the prognostic impact of DEL and COO in patients with relapsed DLBCL treated with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Three-hundred and three patients with stored tissue samples were identified. Classification was successful in 267 patients: 161 (60%) were DEL/non-double hit (DHL), 98 (37%) were non-DEL/non-DHL, and 8 (3%) were DEL/DHL. Compared to non-DEL/non-DHL, DEL/DHL had worse overall survival while DEL/non-DHL did not significantly differ in overall survival. On multivariable analysis, DEL/DHL, age >60 years, and >2 prior therapies, but not COO, were important prognostic factors for overall survival. When we explored the interaction of COO and BCL2 expression, patients with germinal center B-cell (GCB)/BCL2 (+) had inferior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to GCB/BCL2 (-) patients (HR, 4.97; P = 0.027). We conclude that the DEL/non-DHL and non-DEL/non-DHL subtypes of DLBCL have similar survival after ASCT. The negative impact of GCB/BCL2 (+) on PFS warrants future trials targeting BCL2 after ASCT. The inferior outcomes in DEL/DHL need to be verified in a larger number of patients.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Large B-cell Lymphoma with Secondary Central Nervous System Involvement

Secondary central nervous system large B-cell lymphoma (SCNSL) is rare with a generally poor prognosis. There is limited data about the role of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in these high-risk patients. We explored in this study treatment outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with SCNSL who underwent ASCT. We included all consecutive patients who underwent ASCT at our institution. Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). One-hundred two patients were identified. Median age at transplant was 56 (range, 21-71) years. With a median follow-up of 56 (range, 1-256) months, the median PFS and OS were 40 and 88 months, respectively. The 4-year PFS and OS were 48% and 57%, respectively. In univariate analysis, complete remission (CR) at transplant, prior lines of therapy (≤2), normal LDH, and parenchymal involvement were significantly associated with improved PFS. For OS, only CR at transplant and ≤2 prior lines of therapy were associated with improved survival. On multivariable analysis for PFS, CR at transplant (HR 0.278, 95% CI: 0.153-0.506; p=<0.0001) and ≤ 2 prior lines of therapy (HR 0.485, 95% CI: 0.274-0.859; p=0.0131) were significantly associated with superior PFS. Similarly, CR at transplant (HR 0.352, 95% CI: 0.186-0.663; p=0.0013) and ≤ 2 prior lines of therapy (HR 0.476, 95% CI: 0.257-0.882; p=0.0183) were associated with improved survival. In the largest single center study, our findings indicate that ASCT is associated with durable responses and prolonged survival in patients with SCNSL. Patients in CR at transplant and those received less than two lines of therapy have particularly excellent outcomes.

Nine-Year Follow-up of Patients with Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma after Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant and Autologous Transplant

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes between patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma who received a nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) and those who received an autologous transplant (autoSCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 194 patients with follicular lymphoma who received an alloSCT (n = 98) or autoSCT (n = 96) at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). The transplant type used was based on donor availability and by Medicare reimbursement guidelines. Patients who received an alloSCT were enrolled in four consecutive trials in which they received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (or bendamustine), and rituximab conditioning. autoSCT patients received R-BEAM (rituximab, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan).

RESULTS

The median follow-up of survivors was 108 months for the alloSCT group and 102 months for the autoSCT group. Overall survival was significantly better for patients who received an alloSCT compared with those who received an autoSCT (62% vs. 46%; P = 0.048). Similarly, progression-free survival rates were 52% in patients who received an alloSCT and 31% in those who received an autoSCT (P < 0.001), and the 8-year relapse rates were 11% and 43%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Only three patients in the alloSCT group relapsed beyond 3.5 years. In the alloSCT group, the rates for grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD, and extensive chronic GVHD were 22%, 9%, and 38%, respectively. In the autoSCT group, the 8-year incidence of secondary myelodysplasia was 11%. Nonrelapse mortality was similar between the two groups (15% vs. 11% at 8 years; P = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that alloSCT is curative and confers superior survival compared with autoSCT in patients with follicular lymphoma.

Sequential intensive chemotherapy followed by autologous or allogeneic transplantation for refractory lymphoma

We evaluate the safety of bendamustine as a bridge to stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma and residual disease after salvage therapy. Thirty-four subjects without complete responses (CR) received bendamustine 200 mg/m²/day for 2 days followed 14 days later by SCT. Sixteen subjects in partial remission (PR) with maximal FDG-PET SUVs ≤8 prior to bendamustine received autologous SCT, while 13 with suboptimal responses were allografted. Five subjects did not proceed to transplant. No bendamustine toxicities precluded transplantation and no detrimental effect on engraftment or early treatment-related mortality (TRM) was attributable to bendamustine. At 1 year, 75% of auto-recipients and 31% of allo-recipients were alive with CR. Two subjects in the autologous arm developed therapy-related myeloid neoplasia (t-MN). In conclusion, a bendamustine bridge to SCT can be administered without early toxicity to patients with suboptimal responses to salvage chemotherapy. However this approach may increase the risk of t-MN. (NCT02059239).Supplemental data for this article is available online at here.

High-dose rituximab in combination with autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose rituximab (HD-R) in combination with autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS

There were 22 patients in the HD-R group, to whom rituximab was administered during stem cell mobilization (375mg/m² 1 day before and 7 days after chemotherapy) and after transplantation (1000mg/m² on days +1 and +8). In the control group, the procedure was the same as that in the HD-R group but without rituximab. We observed the safety, tolerability, adverse effects and immune reconstitution of HD-R therapy. The log-rank test, univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the effect of HD-R on survival.

RESULTS

In total, 22 relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients were treated with HD-R. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed except for CD19⁺ B cell reconstruction in the first 6 months after SCT. There were 20 relapsed or refractory DLBCL patients in the control group. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) greatly improved in the HD-R group compared to that in the control group (63.8% vs. 35.0%, P=0.028 and 80.1% vs. 50.0%, P=0.035, respectively). The univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that HD-R and the time to relapse were independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS.

CONCLUSION

HD-R in combination with auto-SCT is a feasible and promising treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

Updated Results of Rituximab Pre- and Post-BEAM with or without 90Yttrium Ibritumomab Tiuxetan during Autologous Transplant for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Purpose: We evaluated the effect on long-term survival of adding rituximab (R) to BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) conditioning with or without yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (90YIT) in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).Experimental design: Patients were enrolled on three consecutive phase II clinical trials. Patients received two doses of rituximab (375 and 1,000 mg/m2) during mobilization of stem cells, followed by 1,000 mg/m2 on days +1 and +8 after ASCT with R-BEAM or 90YIT-R-BEAM (90YIT dose of 0.4 mCi/kg) conditioning.Results: One hundred thirteen patients were enrolled, with 73 receiving R-BEAM and 40 receiving 90YIT-R-BEAM. All patients had a prior exposure to rituximab. The median follow-up intervals for survivors were 11.8, 8.1, and 4.2 years in the three trials, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 62% for R-BEAM and 65% for 90YIT-R-BEAM (P = 0.82). The 5-year overall survival rates were 73% and 77%, respectively (P = 0.65). In patients with de novo DLBCL, survival outcomes of the germinal center/activated b-cell histologic subtypes were similar with 5-year OS rates (P = 0.52) and DFS rates (P = 0.64), irrespective of their time of relapse (<1 vs. >1 year) after initial induction chemotherapy (P = 0.97).Conclusions: Administering ASCT with rituximab during stem cell collection and immediately after transplantation induces long-term disease remission and abolishes the negative prognostic impact of cell-of-origin in patients with relapsed DLBCL. The addition of 90YIT does not confer a further survival benefit. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2304-11. ©2018 AACR.

Ipilimumab plus Lenalidomide after Allogeneic and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies

Purpose: Prevention or treatment of relapsed lymphoid malignancies after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) requires novel strategies. We hypothesized that antitumor-cell responses could be enhanced by the addition of lenalidomide to the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitor ipilimumab.Experimental Design: We conducted a phase II investigator-initiated trial to assess the safety and activity of ipilimumab and lenalidomide in patients with lymphoid malignancies that relapsed after allogeneic HSCT and in high-risk patients after autologous HSCT. Patients received 10 mg of oral lenalidomide daily for 21 days followed by intravenous ipilimumab at 3 mg/kg bodyweight. The regimen was repeated 4 weeks later for a total of four treatments.Results: We enrolled 17 patients (10 allogeneic and seven autologous transplant recipients). Immune-mediated toxicity was limited to one patient with asymptomatic hypothyroidism and one with dermatitis in the allogeneic and autologous groups, respectively. One allogeneic transplant recipient had a flare of prior GVHD while taking lenalidomide that precluded further treatment. All others finished treatment without GVHD. Four of 10 patients in the allogeneic group had complete responses (three of which were durable at 19+, 21+, and 32+ months), and three had partial responses. The disease in six of seven patients in the autologous group remains in remission. The groups had similar immune responses, including a two- to threefold increase in inducible ICOS⁺CD4⁺FoxP3^- T-cell number.Conclusions: Our early-phase data suggested that ipilimumab plus lenalidomide is well tolerated after HSCT. Adverse events did not differ significantly between the allogeneic and autologous groups. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1011-8. ©2017 AACR.

A randomized phase II study of standard-dose versus high-dose rituximab with BEAM in autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed aggressive B-cell non-hodgkin lymphomas: long term results

High-dose rituximab (HD-R) combined with carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide and melphalan (BEAM) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was effective and tolerable in a single-arm prospective study of relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R-NHL). We performed a randomized phase 2 study comparing HD-R versus standard-dose rituximab (SD-R) in R-NHL. Ninety-three patients were randomized to HD-R (1000 mg/m² ) (n = 42) or SD-R (375 mg/m² ) (n = 51) administered on post-transplant days +1 and +8, using a Bayesian adaptive algorithm. The 2 treatment arms were balanced in regards to patient demographic and clinical characteristics. At a median follow-up of 7·92 years, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 40% and 48%, respectively. We found no statistically significant differences between HD-R and SD-R in 5-year DFS (36% vs. 43%; P = 0·205) and OS (43% vs. 52%; P = 0·392). In multivariate analyses, only disease status before ASCT [residual disease versus complete remission (CR)] (hazard ratio [HR] 1·79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·08-2·95) and number of prior treatments received (>2 vs. ≤2 lines of treatment) (HR 1·89, 95% CI: 1·13-3·18) were associated with worse DFS and OS. Patients who had SCT while in CR or who received ≤2 lines of treatment prior to SCT had better 5-year OS (57% vs. 35%; P = 0·02 and 54% vs. 30%, P = 0·001, respectively) in both arms. No differences in engraftments or adverse events were noted in the 2 arms. When combined with BEAM and ASCT in relapsed aggressive B-cell NHL, HD-R provided no DFS or OS advantage over SD-R. In patients who have been exposed to rituximab in the frontline or salvage setting, the addition of rituximab in the peri-transplant setting remains controversial.

Suppression of Rituximab-resistant B-cell lymphoma with a novel multi-component anti-CD20 mAb nanocluster

Although the anti-CD20 antibody Rituximab has revolutionized the treatment of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL), resistance to treatment still existed. Thus, strategies for suppressing Rituximab-resistant NHLs are urgently needed. Here, an anti-CD20 nanocluster (ACNC) is successfully constructed from its type I and type II mAb (Rituximab and 11B8). These distinct anti-CD20 mAbs are mass grafted to a short chain polymer (polyethylenimine). Compared with parental Rituximab and 11B8, the ACNC had a reduced “off-rate”. Importantly, ACNC efficiently inhibited Rituximab-resistant lymphomas in both disseminated and localized human NHL xenograft models. Further results revealed that ACNC is significantly potent in inducing caspase-dependent apoptosis and lysosome-mediated programmed cell death (PCD). This may help explain why ACNC is effective in suppressing rituximab-resistant lymphoma while Rituximab and 11B8 are not. Additionally, ACNC experienced low clearance from peripheral blood and high intratumor accumulation. This improved pharmacokinetics is attributed to the antibody-antigen reaction (active targeting) and enhanced permeability and retention (ERP) effect (passive targeting). This study suggested that ACNC might be a promising therapeutic agent for treatment of rituximab-resistant lymphomas.

Role of Maintenance Therapy after High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Aggressive Lymphomas: A Systematic Review

Significant uncertainty exists in regard to the efficacy of maintenance therapy after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) as well as autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for the treatment of patients with aggressive lymphoma. A systematic review was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of post-ASCT maintenance therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma. A comprehensive literature search yielded 4476 studies and a total of 42 studies (11 randomized controlled trials [RCT], 9 retrospective comparative studies, and 22 single-arm studies) were included in the systematic review. There was significant heterogeneity in study design, chemotherapeutic regimens, post-ASCT maintenance strategies, patient enrollment criteria, and study endpoints. Our findings suggest that post-ASCT maintenance immune-targeting strategies, including PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies, rituximab, and brentuximab, may improve progression-free survival but not overall survival. Collectively, the results indicate a need for testing new strategies with well-designed and adequately powered RCTs to better address the role of post-ASCT maintenance in relapsed/refractory lymphomas.

A review of rituximab, the first anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of B non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

Rituximab is a type I anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, which stabilizes CD20 on lipid rafts, promoting antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and complement-dependent cytotoxicity activities. It is the first targeted therapy used in B-cell malignancies and has revolutionized their treatment, without excess of toxicity. In combination with chemotherapy, it has significantly improved response rates and progression-free survival and, for some of them, overall survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma. Moreover, it has been shown to improve progression-free survival in maintenance in follicular lymphoma as well as mantle cell lymphoma. Improvement of its efficacy includes exploration of resistance mechanisms, pharmacokinetics parameters, role of vitamin D and evaluation of subcutaneous route, among others.

Rituximab as consolidation therapy did not improve outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at complete response after dose-dense chemotherapy (CHOP-14)

The authors started a clinical trial to assess the efficacy and toxicity of rituximab (R) as consolidation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, with poor prognostic factors, who were in complete response (CR) after dose-dense chemotherapy (CHOP-14). Four hundred sixty-five untreated patients, with advanced stages (III and IV), older (median age >60 years old), and high clinical risk, were treated with dose-dense CHOP-14 (cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m(2), i.v., day 1; vincristine 2 mg, i.v., standard dose, day 1; epirubicin 120 mg/m(2), i.v., day 1; and prednisone 60 mg/m(2), p.o., days 1-5) every 14 days for six cycles. If CR was achieved, the patients were allocated to receive R (375 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15, and 22) at 3 and 9 months after chemotherapy. Three hundred twenty-five patients achieved CR (70%) and were allocated to receive R (151 patients) or not (174 patients). Actuarial curves at 5 years showed that progression-free survival (PFS) was 51% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44%-58%) in the R group and 53% (95% CI: 47%-59%) in the observation group (p=0.8). Overall survival (OS) was 65% (95% CI: 58%-71%) and 66% (95% CI: 59%-72%), respectively (p=0.78). Late toxicities were more frequent in the R group. The authors showed that the use of R as a consolidation treatment was not useful to improve PFS and OS and toxicity secondary to R was frequent. They did not recommend the use of R as consolidation in this patient setting.

WITHDRAWN: Effective suppression of Rituximab-resistant B-cell lymphoma by a comb-like anti-CD20 mAb nanocluster

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.

Postulated mechanisms of resistance of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma to rituximab treatment regimens: strategies to overcome resistance

Antibody-mediated immunotherapy has gained significant momentum since 1997 when the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first monoclonal antibody (mAb) for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), namely, rituximab (chimeric anti-CD20 mAb). Subsequently, more than 20 approved mAbs have been in use clinically for the treatment of various cancers and several non-cancer-related diseases. Further, the combination treatment of mAbs with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, proteaosome inhibitors, and other inhibitors has resulted in synergistic anti-tumor activity with significant objective clinical responses. Despite their successful clinical use, the underlying mechanisms of rituximab's in vivo activities remain elusive. Further, it is not clear why a subset of patients is initially unresponsive and many responding patients become refractory and resistant to further treatments; hence, the underlying mechanisms of resistance are not known, Attempts have been made to develop model systems to investigate resistance to mAb therapy with the hope to apply the findings in both the generation of new therapeutics and in their use as new prognostic biomarkers. This review focuses on the development of resistance to rituximab treatments and discusses possible underlying mechanisms of action, postulated mechanisms of resistance in model systems, and suggested means to overcome resistance. Several prior reviews on the subject of rituximab resistance have been published and the present review both complements as well as adds new topics of relevance.

Novel conditioning regimens for Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

SUMMARY Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), in chemosensitive relapsed patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), is associated with superior event-free survival (EFS) compared with salvage chemotherapy alone. BEAM is one of the most commonly used regimens in both HL and NHL because of its acceptable toxicity and high effectiveness. The nonrelapsed mortality (NRM) ranges from 7 to 10% in historical studies. More recent investigations have demonstrated a lower NRM, probably due to various factors such as the use of peripheral blood precursor cells and better support therapy. Recently, in order to reduce the toxicity of carmustine and increase antilymphoma activity, several groups have introduced conditioning regimens similar to BEAM. The incorporation of newer drugs (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies ± radiolabeled) to ‘classic’ BEAM, or the substitution of carmustine with other drugs (thiotepa, bendamustine and fotemustine) may be a valuable strategy in this patient setting. In this review, we will discuss the data available on HDC followed by ASCT in lymphoma using new conditioning regimens, namely second-generation BEAM.

Multiple infusions of CD20-targeted T cells and low-dose IL-2 after SCT for high-risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a pilot study

A pilot phase I clinical trial involving 15 infusions of anti-CD3 × anti-CD20 bispecific Ab (CD20Bi)-armed anti-CD3-activated T cells (aATC) and low-dose IL-2 was conducted in three non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients (two high-risk and one refractory) after autologous SCT. The feasibility of T-cell expansion, safety of aATC infusions, cytotoxic immune responses and trafficking of aATC were evaluated. Three NHL patients received 15 infusions of 5 × 10(9) aATC (three infusions/week for 3 weeks and one infusion/week for 6 weeks) between days 1 and 65 after SCT with IL-2. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. Chills, fever, hypotension and malaise were the common side effects. Engraftment was delayed in one patient with a low stem cell dose. CD20Bi aATC infusions induced specific cytotoxicity directed at lymphoma targets. Endogenous peripheral blood mononuclear cells from two patients mediated anti-lymphoma cytotoxicity above preSCT background (P<0.001). (111)In labeled aATC trafficked to the lungs at 1 h and accumulated in the liver and bone marrow after 24 h. aATC infusions given over 69 days in combination with IL-2 were safe, did not inhibit engraftment, and induced endogenous cytotoxic responses directed at lymphoma targets.

Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Recommendations from the GEL/TAMO Spanish Cooperative Group

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is considered a distinct type of B-cell lymphoma genetically characterized by the t(11;14) translocation and cyclin D1 overexpression. There is also a small subset of tumors negative for cyclin D1 expression that are morphologically and immunophenotypically indistinguishable from conventional MCL. Although in the last decades, the median overall survival of patients with MCL has improved significantly, it is still considered as one of the poorest prognoses diseases among B-cell lymphomas. Election of treatment for patients with MCL is complex due to the scarcity of solid evidence. Current available data shows that conventional chemotherapy does not yield satisfactory results as in other types of B-cell lymphomas. However, the role of other approaches such as autologous or allogenic stem cell transplantation, immunotherapy, the administration of consolidation or maintenance schedules, or the use of targeted therapies still lack clear indications. In view of this situation, the Spanish Group of Lymphomas/Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation has conducted a series of reviews on different aspects of MCL, namely its diagnosis, prognosis, first-line and salvage treatment (both in young and elderly patients), new targeted therapies, and detection of minimal residual disease. On the basis of the available evidence, a series of recommendations have been issued with the intention of providing guidance to clinicians on the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of patients with MCL.

Monoclonal antibodies in conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation

Monoclonal antibodies are increasingly being incorporated in conditioning regimens for autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The benefit of adding rituximab to autologous HCT regimens is purportedly related to in vivo purging of clonal B cells. Randomized trials comparing the addition (or not) of rituximab to high-dose therapy regimens are lacking. No benefit of standard-dose radioimmunotherapy-based regimens for autografting in aggressive lymphomas was seen in a randomized controlled study. The incorporation of rituximab into allogeneic HCT regimens aims to improve responses while reducing nonrelapse mortality resulting from acute graft-versus-host disease. The optimal dose and administration schedule of rituximab in this setting are unknown, and potentially serious complications from increased infections owing to prolonged (and profound) cytopenias or persistent hypogammaglobulinemia are of concern. Radioimmunotherapy-based conditioning for allografting holds promise as a modality to optimize tumor control and synergize adoptive immunotherapy effects, but it remains experimental at this time. The addition of alemtuzumab to allogeneic HCT regimens is associated with prolonged lymphopenia and impaired immune reconstitution, high relapse rates, and serious infections. The optimal dose and schedule of alemtuzumab to avoid prolonged immune paresis remain elusive. It is anticipated that additional monoclonal antibodies will soon become available that can be incorporated into HCT regimens after safety and clinical efficacy are demonstrated.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation for non-hodgkin lymphoma

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas constitute a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies with varying aggressiveness and many therapeutic options. Nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning has been the cornerstone of allogeneic adoptive immunotherapy for these diseases. This approach utilizes a reduced intensity preparative regimen to achieve engraftment with little toxicity. This allows for development of the immune graft-versus-lymphoma effect. Results depend on the histologic type of lymphoma, prognostic factors, patient characteristics, and chemosensitivity. For follicular lymphomas, NMA transplants are highly effective in patients with refractory or recurrent disease after the best chemoimmunotherapy available and who have a matched sibling or unrelated donor. In mantle cell lymphoma, autologous stem cell transplants are generally ineffective for patients with recurrent disease; we reported 6-year actuarial progression-free survival rate of 46%, using NMA allogeneic transplants. The indications of NMA transplants for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and T-cell lymphomas are controversial; success has been reported in selected high-risk patients and those relapsing after an autologous transplantation who have chemosensitive disease. Considerations for the conditioning regimen, donor source, graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, donor lymphocyte infusion, and relapse prevention methods are reviewed.

Phase I study of a modified regimen of ⁹⁰Yttrium-ibritumomab tiuxetan for relapsed or refractory follicular or transformed CD20+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Radioimmunotherapy capitalizes on the radiosensitivity of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and the targeted nature of monoclonal antibodies. In an attempt to reverse bone marrow infiltration with B-cells and optimize the biodistribution of Yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y)-ibritumomab tiuxetan, we conducted a phase I study combining a single course of ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan after a 4-weekly course of rituximab in relapsed or refractory low-grade or transformed CD20+ B-cell NHLs with <25% marrow involvement. The 0.4 mCi/kg dose was associated with 80% grade-4 cytopenias. Dose escalation was held, and 6 patients were enrolled at a 0.3 mCi/kg cohort. As the 0.3 mCi/kg dose was well tolerated, the 0.4 mCi/kg cohort was expanded to 6 additional patients. In the expansion cohort, grade-4 cytopenia developed in 33%. Further dose escalation was held, and the maximum tolerated dose was determined at 0.4 mCi/kg. With this regimen, marrow involvement decreased in all patients with complete clearance in 50%. The overall response rate was 82%. With a median follow-up of 31.7 months, the median progression-free survival and time to next treatment were 12.3 and 10.9 months, respectively. Although this regimen was associated with a high response rate, the hematologic toxicity was higher than with the standard ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan regimen.

CD20-targeted T cells after stem cell transplantation for high risk and refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

A phase I trial of infusing anti-CD3 × anti-CD20 bispecific antibody (CD20Bi) armed activated T cells (aATC) was conducted in high-risk/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients to determine whether aATC infusions are safe, affect immune recovery, and induce an antilymphoma effect. Ex vivo expanded ATC from 12 patients were armed with anti-CD20 bispecific antibody, cryopreserved, and infused after autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). Patients underwent SCT after high-dose chemotherapy, and aATC infusions were started on day +4. The patients received 1 infusion of aATC per week for 4 weeks after SCT with doses of 5, 10, 15, and 20 × 10(9). aATC infusions were safe and did not impair engraftment. The major side effects were chills, fever, hypotension, and fatigue. The mean number of IFN-γ Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Spots (ElSpots) directed at CD20 positive lymphoma cells (DAUDI, P = .0098) and natural killer cell targets (K562, P < .0051) and the mean specific cytotoxicity directed at DAUDI (P = .037) and K562 (P = .002) from pre-SCT to post-SCT were significantly higher. The increase in IFN-γ EliSpots from pre-SCT to post-SCT in patients who received armed ATC after SCT were significantly higher than those in patients who received SCT alone (P = .02). Serum IL-7, IL-15, Macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 beta, IP-10, MIP-1α, and Monokine induced by gamma interferone increased within hours after infusion. Polyclonal and specific antibodies were near normal 3 months after SCT. aATC infusions were safe and increased innate and specific antilymphoma cell immunity without impairing antibody recovery after SCT.

Is there any role for transplantation in the rituximab era for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?

Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard of treatment for chemosensitive relapses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy has improved the response rate and failure-free survival after first-line treatment and relapses. Fewer relapses are expected, although there is no consensus on the best salvage regimen. The intergroup Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) set the limits for this standard of treatment after first comparing 2 salvage regimens: rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide, and carboplatin (R-ICE) and rituximab, dexamethasone, aracytine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP). There was no difference in response rates or survivals between these salvage regimens. Several factors affected survival: prior treatment with rituximab, early relapse (< 12 months), and a secondary International Prognostic Index score of 2-3. For patients with 2 factors, the response rate to salvage was only 46%, which identified easily a group with poor outcome. Moreover, patients with an ABC subtype or c-MYC translocation responded poorly to treatment. More than 70% of patients will not benefit from standard salvage therapy, and continued progress is needed. Studies evaluating immunotherapy after transplantation, including allotransplantation, new conditioning regimens with radioimmunotherapy and other combinations of chemotherapy based on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtype, are discussed herein. Early relapses and/or patients refractory to upfront rituximab-based chemotherapy have a poor response rate and prognosis. A better biological understanding of these patients and new approaches are warranted.

Rituximab maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with relapsed CD20(+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final analysis of the collaborative trial in relapsed aggressive lymphoma

PURPOSE

The standard treatment for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). The impact of maintenance rituximab after ASCT is not known.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 477 patients with CD20(+) DLBCL who were in their first relapse or refractory to initial therapy were randomly assigned to one of two salvage regimens. After three cycles of salvage chemotherapy, the responding patients received high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT. Then, 242 patients were randomly assigned to either rituximab every 2 months for 1 year or observation.

RESULTS

After ASCT, 122 patients received rituximab, and 120 patients were observed only. The median follow-up time was 44 months. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) rates after ASCT were 52% and 53% for the rituximab and observation groups, respectively (P = .7). Treatment with rituximab was associated with a 15% attributable risk of serious adverse events after day 100, with more deaths (six deaths v three deaths in the observation arm). Several factors affected EFS after ASCT (P < .05), including relapsed disease within 12 months (EFS: 46% v 56% for relapsed disease after 12 months), secondary age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (saaIPI) more than 1 (EFS: 37% v 61% for saaIPI < 1), and prior treatment with rituximab (EFS: 47% v 59% for no prior rituximab). A significant difference in EFS between women (63%) and men (46%) was also observed in the rituximab group. In the Cox model for maintenance, the saaIPI was a significant prognostic factor (P < .001), as was male sex (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

In relapsed DLBCL, we observed no difference between the control group and the rituximab maintenance group and do not recommend rituximab after ASCT.

Safety and efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma or systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma

Antibody-based immunotherapy has become an integral part of cancer therapeutics. However, monoclonal antibodies have their limitations as identifying an antigen selectively expressed on malignant cells and developing a high-affinity antibody may not by itself alter tumor growth. This is illustrated in the case of CD30; CD30 epitomizes many properties of an ideal pharmacologic target such as high expression on malignant cells and limited expression on normal tissues. However, until the advent of brentuximab vedotin, CD30 remained an elusive target as antibody-based anti-CD30 immunotherapy had been largely clinically unsuccessful. Brentuximab vedotin (cAC10-vcMMAE, SGN-35) is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of a chimeric anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody whereupon the potent microtubule inhibitor monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) is attached via a valine-citrulline linker. Once bound to CD30, brentuximab vedotin is internalized and MMAE is released with the action of lysosomal enzymes on the linker. In phase I studies in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma, brentuximab vedotin induced unprecedented responses with manageable toxicity. In phase II studies, brentuximab vedotin induced overall response rates of 75% and 86% in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma, respectively. The results of these trials led to the accelerated approval of the drug by the US Food and Drug Administration in a patient population with few other alternative options. Brentuximab vedotin has overall manageable toxicity profile; however, cumulative peripheral neuropathy constitutes an important clinical consideration as it may limit prolonged administration of the drug. The mechanism by which brentuximab vedotin exerts its antitumor activity is not entirely clear. Diffusion of MMAE in the tumor microenvironment and cytotoxicity on bystander cells may in part explain its activity, especially in Hodgkin lymphoma. Herein, we review the biology of CD30 and brentuximab vedotin, and the clinical data that has accumulated thus far with SGN-35.

Nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation with or without 90yttrium ibritumomab tiuxetan is potentially curative for relapsed follicular lymphoma: 12-year results

In 2008, we reported favorable 5-year outcomes of nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation after fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (FCR) conditioning for relapsed and chemosensitive follicular lymphoma. However, innovative strategies were still needed to treat patients with chemorefractory disease. We therefore subsequently performed a trial in which (90)Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (0.4 mCi/kg) was added to the fludarabine, cyclophosphamide conditioning regimen ((90)YFC). Here, we report updated results of the FCR trial and outcomes after (90)YFC. For the FCR group (N = 47), since the last update, one patient developed recurrent disease. With a median follow-up of 107 months (range, 72-142 months), the 11-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 78%, and 72%, respectively. For the (90)YFC group (N = 26), more patients had chemorefractory disease than did those in the FCR group (38% and 0%, P < .001). With a median follow-up of 33 months (range,17-94 months), the 3-year progression-free survival rates for patients with chemorefractory and chemosensitive disease were 80% and 87%, respectively (P = .7). The low frequency of relapse observed after a long follow-up interval of 9 years in the FCR group suggests that these patients are cured of their disease. The addition of (90)Y to the conditioning regimen appears to be effective in patients with chemorefractory disease. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00048737.

The role of autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DLBCL) accounting for approximately 30% of new lymphoma diagnoses in adult patients. Complete remissions (CRs) can be achieved in 45% to 55% of patients and cure in approximately 30-35% with anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy. The ageadjusted IPI (aaIPI) has been widely employed, particularly to "tailor" more intensive therapy such as high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous hemopoietic stem cell rescue (ASCT). IPI, however, has failed to reliably predict response to specific therapies. A subgroup of young patients with poor prognosis exists. To clarify the role of HDT/ASCT combined with rituximab in the front line therapy a longer follow-up and randomized studies are needed. The benefit of HDT/ASCT for refractory or relapsed DLBCL is restricted to patients with immunochemosensitive disease. Currently, clinical and biological research is focused to improve the curability of this setting of patients, mainly young.

A randomized study comparing yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) and high-dose BEAM chemotherapy versus BEAM alone as the conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma

BACKGROUND

High-dose chemotherapy combined with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard therapy for refractory/relapsed aggressive lymphoma. In the era of rituximab-containing frontline regimens, it is becoming more challenging to salvage patients in this setting, and novel approaches are required. This is a randomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of standard-dose ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) combined with high-dose BEAM chemotherapy (Z-BEAM) and ASCT in refractory/relapsed aggressive lymphoma.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with CD20(+) -aggressive lymphoma were randomized to a treatment arm (Z-BEAM, n = 22) or control arm (BEAM alone, n = 21). Ibritumomab tiuxetan was given at 0.4 mCi/kg on day -14 before ASCT.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics, engraftment kinetics, and toxicity profile were similar between the 2 groups. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 48% (95% confidence interval, 32%-64%): 59% and 37% after Z-BEAM and BEAM alone, respectively (P = .2). Multivariate analysis identified advanced age (hazard ratio [HR], 8.3; P = .001), high-risk disease (relapse within 12 months of diagnosis and/or secondary International Prognostic Index >2; HR, 2.8; P = .04), positive positron emission tomography-computed tomography pretransplant (HR, 2.4; P = .07), and BEAM alone (HR, 2.8; P = .03) as poor prognostic factors. Intermediate-risk patients with 1 or 2 risk factors had better PFS with Z-BEAM compared with BEAM: 69% and 29%, respectively (P = .07). Two-year overall survival was 91% and 62% after Z-BEAM and BEAM, respectively (P = .05). Similar prognostic factors determined survival. The HR for BEAM alone in the multivariate analysis was 8.1 (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Standard-dose ibritumomab tiuxetan combined with BEAM high-dose chemotherapy is safe and possibly more effective than BEAM alone as a conditioning regimen for ASCT in the era of rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimens.

How to determine post-RCHOP therapy for risk-tailored adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, addition of maintenance rituximab or observation: multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

In international prognostic index (IPI) risk-tailored adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), it is still unclear whether the addition of maintenance rituximab (MR) improves progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after RCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) therapy.

METHODS

In our study, 207 patients (age: 21-59 years) received six 14-day cycles of RCHOP and gained overall response. After RCHOP, 98 patients were enrolled in the observation (OBS) arm. 109 patients continued to receive MR therapy.

RESULTS

In IPI risk <2 profile, PFS at 5 years reached 72.9% (MR arm) versus 56% (OBS arm) (P = 0.033). In IPI risk ≥2 profile, PFS estimation at 5 years was 44.9% (MR arm) versus 33.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.006). It is noteworthy that patients with IPI ≥2 who received MR achieved PFS similar to that for patients in the OBS arm with the IPI <2, 44.9% versus 56% (P = 0.97). In patients with an IPI <2, OS at 5 years was 83.2% (MR arm) versus 81.2% (OBS arm) (P = 0.708). In patients with an IPI ≥2, 5-year OS estimation was 44.6% (MR arm) versus 40.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.067). Subgroup analysis of patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile shows a survival benefit for patients receiving MR. OS at 5 years was 62% (MR arm) versus 49% (OBS arm), (P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, maintenance rituximab after RCHOP improves progression-free survival. In addition, overall survival is improved for patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile receiving MR.

The role of transplantation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: the impact of rituximab plus chemotherapy in first-line and relapsed settings

Rituximab has improved the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but a high proportion of patients with advanced disease will relapse or will fail to achieve a remission with front-line treatment. Salvage chemotherapy, followed by high-dose chemotherapy or radiation therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation, remains the best treatment option for such patients, especially those who retain chemosensitivity. Allogeneic transplantation is under investigation in this setting, often as a treatment for relapse after autologous transplantation. Treatment-related mortality due to graft-versus-host disease, preparative regimen toxicity, and poor immune recovery often limits its benefits. This article reviews the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the incorporation of rituximab, and avenues of clinical investigation in this rapidly evolving field.

The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: update of the 2006 evidence-based review

Clinical research published since the first evidence-based review on the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults is presented and critically evaluated in this update. Treatment recommendations changed or modified based on new evidence include: (1) myeloablative allogeneic SCT is an appropriate treatment for adult (<35 years) ALL in first complete remission for all disease risk groups; and (2) reduced-intensity conditioning may produce similar outcomes to myeloablative regimens. Treatment recommendations unchanged or strengthened by new evidence include: (1) allogeneic SCT is recommended over chemotherapy for ALL in second complete remission or greater; (2) allogeneic is superior to autologous SCT; and (3) there are similar survival outcomes after related and unrelated allogeneic SCT. New treatment recommendations based on new evidence include: (1) in the absence of a suitable allogeneic donor, autologous SCT may be an appropriate therapy, but results in a high relapse rate; (2) it is appropriate to consider cord blood transplantation for patients with no HLA well-matched donor; and (3) imatinib therapy before and/or after SCT (for Ph+ ALL) yields significantly superior survival outcomes. Areas of needed research in the treatment of adult ALL with SCT were identified and presented in the review.

Rituximab resistance

Rituximab has become a ubiquitous component of treatment regimens for follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Despite widespread clinical use, the mechanisms by which tumor cells resist rituximab-mediated destruction remain unclear. Rituximab relies in part on immune effector mechanisms for its antitumor effect, and thus resistance may be mediated not only by intrinsic tumor-cell alterations but also by the host immunological environment. In this article, we explore the mechanisms of action of rituximab, the incidence of rituximab resistance, and potential mechanisms of resistance. Finally, we discuss novel approaches to modulate the antibody, the tumor cell, and the host immunologic environment to overcome rituximab resistance. Further research into the mechanisms of rituximab resistance will be essential to improving the efficacy of anti-CD20 therapy in NHL, and may also pay dividends in the optimization of monoclonal antibody therapy across a wide range of diseases.

Transplantation for non-Hodgkin lymphoma

High-dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) has become the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, relapse remains the most common cause of treatment failure after auto-HCT. More intensive regimens incorporating radioimmunotherapy into high-dose regimens have been developed to prevent relapse. The role of auto-HCT for follicular lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma remain inconclusive. Since prognosis of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified are very poor with conventional chemotherapy, auto-HCT during first remission is being explored in peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Given the lower risk of relapse after allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) in NHL, allo-HCT has been performed in patients with refractory or relapsed NHL, especially after auto-HCT failure. However, the transplant-related mortality remains high after myeloablative allo-HCT. Reduced-intensity conditioning followed by allo-HCT has been shown to reduce transplant-related mortality but graft-versus-host disease continues to be the major problem, thus the role of allo-HCT in NHL remains an investigational approach for NHL. The outcomes of auto-HCT and allo-HCT for various lymphomas are reviewed.

Stem cell transplantation for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the rituximab era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Addition of rituximab to conventional chemotherapies was shown to improve outcome in phase 3 trials of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). As the challenge in the rituximab era is to increase treatment efficacy, the present review attempts to assess the results of high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as front-line treatment for poor-prognosis DLBCL patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

French and Italian groups demonstrated in several phase 2 series that high-dose front-line treatment with rituximab plus ASCT gave better results than without rituximab. In relapse, the CORAL study, a worldwide collaborative effort, showed that assessment of the latest results for ASCT should also take account of other prognostic factors, including advanced stage, chemo/rituximab refractory disease and a short interval between remission and relapse. This underscores the need for innovative therapeutic strategies such as radiolabelled conditioning regimens and maintenance after ASCT. Allogeneic transplantation, which generates a graft-versus-lymphoma effect that reduces the likelihood of relapse, may also be beneficial for high-risk patients.

SUMMARY

In this setting, new approaches based on improved understanding of the biology of the disease will play a key role.

Stem cell transplantation in childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphomas

Despite the high cure rates achieved with intensified primary therapies for childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), the prognosis for children with relapsed or refractory disease is poor. Optimal treatment for this group remains a challenge. Dose intensification followed by stem cell transplantation has been used in these circumstances and may provide a curative treatment option for these patients, but the number of children treated using this approach is relatively small and its effectiveness has been difficult to judge. Moreover, the limited experience is insufficient to define the patient most likely to benefit from transplantation. Likewise, the selection of autologous or allogeneic transplantation and the optimal conditioning regimen are debated. We summarize the current experience for stem cell transplantation in childhood NHL and offer our recommendations.

Risk factors for the development of secondary malignancy after high-dose chemotherapy and autograft, with or without rituximab: a 20-year retrospective follow-up study in patients with lymphoma

PURPOSE

High-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autograft is effective in high-risk lymphoma, particularly with the addition of rituximab; however, it is associated with risk of secondary malignancy. These issues have been addressed in a series of 1,347 patients with lymphoma treated with a high-dose sequential (HDS) program.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1,024 patients with B-cell lymphoma, 234 patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma, and 89 patients with T-cell lymphoma were treated with HDS between 1985 and 2005 at 11 Gruppo Italiano Terapie Innovative Linfomi centers. HDS was given as salvage treatment to 707 patients (52%); 655 patients (49%) received a modified HDS, with high-dose cytarabine and two consecutive PBPC harvests. Rituximab-supplemented HDS was given to 523 patients (39%).

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 7 years, the median overall survival (OS) was 16.2 years; in B-cell lymphoma the OS was significantly superior with rituximab HDS compared to HDS alone. The cumulative incidence at 5 and 10 years of secondary myelodysplasia/acute leukemia (sMDS/AL) were 3.09% and 4.52%, respectively, that of solid tumors were 2.54% and 6.79%, respectively. Factors associated with sMDS/AL were male sex and use of the second harvest PBPC for the graft; factors found to be associated with solid tumor were advanced age, post-HDS radiotherapy, and rituximab addition to HDS. Despite the increased risk of solid tumors, rituximab addition to HDS was still associated with survival advantages.

CONCLUSION

This analysis has relevant implications for the design and use of intensive chemoimmunotherapy with autograft. In addition, it offers useful insights toward the understanding and prevention of tumor development.

Phase II study of immunomodulation with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-2, and rituximab following autologous stem cell transplant in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphomas

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) leads to durable remissions in approximately half of patients with chemosensitive relapsed or refractory aggressive lymphomas; however, many will relapse despite ASCT secondary to persistent minimal residual disease (MRD) or malignant graft contamination. Post-transplant rituximab may eradicate MRD. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) might enhance the efficacy of rituximab by augmenting antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). We hypothesized that given together, rituximab, GM-CSF, and IL-2 might eradicate MRD and improve event-free survival following ASCT. Forty-six patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) were enrolled. Stem cells were mobilized with G-CSF and GM-CSF following chemotherapy. Following BEAM conditioning, patients received GM-CSF until neutrophil engraftment. Between days + 30 and + 120, patients received one dose of rituximab 375 mg/m(2) (cycle 1), followed by three cycles of GM-CSF 250 microg/m(2)/day SQ days 1-5, IL-2 1.5 x 10(6) IU/m(2)/day SQ days 6-12, and rituximab 375 mg/m(2) IV day 9, repeated every 21 days. Thirty-eight patients were eligible for post-ASCT immunotherapy. Nine patients completed 1-2 cycles and 21 completed 3-4 cycles; eight patients did not receive post-ASCT immunotherapy. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and grade 3 thrombocytopenia were observed. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the estimated 5-year OS and EFS for all patients eligible for immunotherapy are 65% and 45%, respectively. Post-ASCT immunomodulation with rituximab, IL-2, and GM-CSF was feasible and safe, but not all patients were able to continue on to post-ASCT immunotherapy.

The role of rituximab in autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy has substantially changed the treatment strategies for patients with B-cell lymphomas. Rituximab, combined with standard chemotherapy regimens, shows consistently improved results compared with chemotherapy alone and has been extensively employed in both newly diagnosed and relapsed patients with B-cell lymphoma. Because of its low toxicity profile and its potent antilymphoma activity mediated through direct apoptotic and indirect effector mechanisms, rituximab also has been actively incorporated into stem cell transplantation (SCT) protocols to attain a state of minimal disease, provide a safe and effective method for in vivo purging prior to autologous SCT, and promote graft-versus-lymphoma effects in allogeneic SCT. This review compiles the still immature but rapidly growing data on this combined modality.

Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era

PURPOSE

Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Salvage regimens have never been compared; their efficacy in the rituximab era is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with CD20(+) DLBCL in first relapse or who were refractory after first-line therapy were randomly assigned to either rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide, and carboplatin (R-ICE) or rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP). Responding patients received high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT.

RESULTS

The median age of the 396 patients enrolled (R-ICE, n = 202; R-DHAP, n = 194) was 55 years. Similar response rates were observed after three cycles of R-ICE (63.5%; 95% CI, 56% to 70%) and R-DHAP (62.8%; 95 CI, 55% to 69%). Factors affecting response rates (P < .001) were refractory disease/relapse less than versus more than 12 months after diagnosis (46% v 88%, respectively), International Prognostic Index (IPI) of more than 1 versus 0 to 1 (52% v 71%, respectively), and prior rituximab treatment versus no prior rituximab (51% v 83%, respectively). There was no significant difference between R-ICE and R-DHAP for 3-year event-free survival (EFS) or overall survival. Three-year EFS was affected by prior rituximab treatment versus no rituximab (21% v 47%, respectively), relapse less than versus more than 12 months after diagnosis (20% v 45%, respectively), and IPI of 2 to 3 versus 0 to 1 (18% v 40%, respectively). In the Cox model, these parameters were significant (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In patients who experience relapse more than 12 months after diagnosis, prior rituximab treatment does not affect EFS. Patients with early relapses after rituximab-containing first-line therapy have a poor prognosis, with no difference between the effects of R-ICE and R-DHAP.