Cancer targeting vaccines: surrogate measures of activity

Recent FDA approval of sipuleucel-T and Ipilimumab as indicated immunologic therapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer and melanoma, respectively, has established a foothold for broader utilization of vaccine based technology in managing cancer.  Despite difficulty of cell harvest and processing with sipuleucel-T and modest toxicity to Ipilimumab, when matched up with the appropriate cancer patient these immunologic approaches have provided significant benefit and have stimulated exciting forward progress in the development of new potent and less toxic (more targeted) vaccines.  However, surrogate measures of activity to optimally define more sensitive subset populations and to determine length of treatment time in order to optimize management with other treatment options remain elusive.  Key clinically tested vaccines under development which demonstrate correlation of patient benefit to induced immune responsiveness will be discussed.  Results suggest with some vaccines correlation of patient benefit and surrogate measures of activity actually do exist.  Examples will be discussed.

Gene therapy for lung neoplasms

Both advanced-stage lung cancer and malignant pleural mesothelioma are associated with a poor prognosis. Advances in treatment regimens for both diseases have had only a modest effect on their progressive course. Gene therapy for thoracic malignancies represents a novel therapeutic approach and has been evaluated in several clinical trials. Strategies have included induction of apoptosis, tumor suppressor gene replacement, suicide gene expression, cytokine-based therapy, various vaccination approaches, and adoptive transfer of modified immune cells. This review considers the clinical results, limitations, and future directions of gene therapy trials for thoracic malignancies.

Current vaccine updates for lung cancer

Current treatments for lung cancer are far from optimal. Several immunotherapeutic strategies involving vaccines incorporating different tumor-associated antigens to induce immune responses against tumors are being tested in clinical trials internationally. Although small, benefits have indeed been observed from the early studies of these vaccines, and the future is looking brighter for lung cancer patients as a handful of these immunotherapies reach Phase III trials. In addition, optimizing the induced immune response by these vaccines has become a priority, and a number of techniques are being considered, including addition of adjuvants and combining vaccines, which affect synergy based on their mechanism of action. This review is an update on the current vaccines in production, the benefits observed from their most recent studies, and the upcoming plans for improvements in these immunotherapies.

Gene therapy for mesothelioma and lung cancer

Both malignant pleural mesothelioma and advanced stage lung cancer are associated with a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, current treatment regimens have had only a modest effect on their progressive course. Gene therapy for thoracic malignancies represents a novel therapeutic approach and has been evaluated in a number of clinical trials over the last two decades. Using viral vectors or anti-sense RNA, strategies have included induction of apoptosis, tumor suppressor gene replacement, suicide gene expression, cytokine-based therapy, various vaccination approaches, and adoptive transfer of modified immune cells. This review will consider the clinical results, limitations, and future directions of gene therapy trials for thoracic malignancies.

Gene immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Historically, limited results have been observed with immunity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the last 5 years, however, several immune-stimulating products have demonstrated enhancement of tumor antigen recognition through activation of dendritic cell-involved processes. Moreover, clinical benefit has been demonstrated in subsets of patients, justifying ongoing phase III investigation. Results of key gene immunotherapies being tested in NSCLC are reviewed. Preliminary results in advanced NSCLC suggest evidence of well-tolerated immune activation with suggested evidence of clinical benefit with respect to survival and response.

Active specific immunotherapy and cell-transfer therapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is an intractable disease urgently requiring more effective treatment approaches. The potential of immunotherapy in this context remains promising, although presently there are no satisfactory protocols available for lung cancer. However, encouraging evidence of clinical benefits from immunotherapy is beginning to accumulate in several lung cancer trials. Better understanding of tumor-specific immune responses, identifying tumor-associated antigens, and manipulating the immunoregulatory environment of the tumor is likely to further increase the efficacy of immune-mediated cancer therapies. Here, we review recent advances in cellular immunotherapy and vaccines for lung cancer, emphasizing an important paradigm shift in the analysis of clinical benefit away from "tumor response" towards "patient response".

A review of vaccine clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer

Recent evidence suggests that vaccines which enhance tumour antigen recognition may provide clinical benefit to subsets of non-small cell lung cancer patients. In this review, a variety of peptide-, gene- and cell-based clinical vaccine approaches targeting non-small cell lung cancer patients are reviewed. Results consistently demonstrate lack of toxicity. Examples of prolonged stable disease, tumour shrinkage response and survival benefit in comparison with historical and low-dose control groups have been demonstrated. Specific vaccines fulfilling justification for Phase III evaluation based on these results include LBLP25, TGF-beta2 antisense gene vaccine and GVAX.