Response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST/RECIST) and SUVmax in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and of pre- and post-treatment maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUV_max) in regards to survival and tumor control for patients treated for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Methods

This is a retrospective review of patients with ES-NSCLC treated at our institution using SBRT. Lobar, locoregional, and distant failures were evaluated based on PERCIST/RECIST and clinical course. Univariate analysis of the Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), lobar control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), and distant control (DC) was conducted using the log-rank test. Pre- and post-treatment SUV_max were evaluated using cutoffs of < 5 and ≥ 5, < 4 and ≥ 4, and < 3 and ≥ 3. ∆SUV_max was also evaluated at various cutoffs. Cox regression analysis was conducted to evaluate survival outcomes based on age, gender, pre-treatment gross tumor volume (GTV), longest tumor dimension on imaging, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

Results

This study included 95 patients (53 female, 42 male), median age 75. Lung SBRT was delivered in 3–5 fractions to a total of 48–60 Gy, with a BED_{α/β = 10Gy} of at least 100 Gy. Median OS and PFS from the end of SBRT was 15.4 and 11.9 months, respectively. On univariate analysis, PERCIST/RECIST response correlated with PFS (p = 0.039), LC (p = 0.007), and LRC (p = 0.015) but not OS (p = 0.21) or DC (p = 0.94). Pre-treatment SUV_max and post-treatment SUV_max with cutoff values of < 5 and ≥ 5, < 4 and ≥ 4, and < 3 and ≥ 3 did not predict for OS, PFS, LC, LRC, or DC. ∆SUV_max did not predict for OS, PFS, LC, LRC, or DC. On multivariate analysis, pre-treatment GTV ≥ 30 cm³ was significantly associated with worse survival outcomes when accounting for other confounding variables.

Conclusions

PERCIST/RECIST response is associated with improved LC and PFS in patients treated for ES-NSCLC with SBRT. In contrast, pre- and post-treatment SUV_max is not predictive of disease control or survival.

Docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (the TAC regimen): an effective adjuvant treatment for operable breast cancer

The introduction of taxanes in the armamentarium against breast cancer in the 1990s has been one of the landmarks in the treatment of this disease. Docetaxel in particular is considered one of the most active cytotoxic agents in metastatic breast cancer and has also been tested as adjuvant postsurgical therapy in earlier stages. A regimen including docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (the TAC regimen) was the first combination that demonstrated the efficacy of docetaxel in the adjuvant setting. This combination has been approved by regulatory agencies for adjuvant therapy of node-positive breast cancer and is presently used worldwide. TAC is more toxic than the traditional anthracycline-containing combinations, but many of its side effects can be ameliorated with colony-stimulating growth factor support.

Whole chromosome alterations predict survival in high-risk neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification

PURPOSE

Patients with stage IV neuroblastoma over the age of 500 days without MYCN amplification have a survival rate of <30% and there are currently no reliable means of predicting which of these patients will survive or succumb to the disease. The goal of this study is to develop a DNA copy number-based prognostic profile for these patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We have used comparative genomic hybridization to identify genome copy number changes that can predict outcome in patients with stage IV neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification.

RESULTS

A strong correlation of patient survival with the presence of whole chromosome changes (WCC >or=2) was observed, even in the group of patients older than 500 days at time of diagnosis. This novel prognostic marker showed a significant dependence on the date of diagnosis; patients with WCC >or=2 diagnosed after 1998 had a significantly higher probability of survival compared with those diagnosed earlier. At the same time, no such time dependence was found among the samples with WCC <2, suggesting that medical progress patients in recent years has particularly benefited those patients with a stage IV non-MYCN-amplified disease if WCC >or=2 were present.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, we present a novel prognostic marker for survival of high-risk neuroblastoma patients over the age of 500 days without MYCN amplification and diagnosed after 1998. Further validation study is required to establish this risk stratification for these patients.

Definition of clinically distinct molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade

PURPOSE

A number of microarray studies have reported distinct molecular profiles of breast cancers (BC), such as basal-like, ErbB2-like, and two to three luminal-like subtypes. These were associated with different clinical outcomes. However, although the basal and the ErbB2 subtypes are repeatedly recognized, identification of estrogen receptor (ER) -positive subtypes has been inconsistent. Therefore, refinement of their molecular definition is needed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have previously reported a gene expression grade index (GGI), which defines histologic grade based on gene expression profiles. Using this algorithm, we assigned ER-positive BC to either high-or low-genomic grade subgroups and compared these with previously reported ER-positive molecular classifications. As further validation, we classified 666 ER-positive samples into subtypes and assessed their clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Two ER-positive molecular subgroups (high and low genomic grade) could be defined using the GGI. Despite tracking a single biologic pathway, these were highly comparable to the previously described luminal A and B classification and significantly correlated to the risk groups produced using the 21-gene recurrence score. The two subtypes were associated with statistically distinct clinical outcome in both systemically untreated and tamoxifen-treated populations.

CONCLUSION

The use of genomic grade can identify two clinically distinct ER-positive molecular subtypes in a simple and highly reproducible manner across multiple data sets. This study emphasizes the important role of proliferation-related genes in predicting prognosis in ER-positive BC.

Critical review of the management of early-stage breast cancer in elderly women

The treatment of elderly women (> or =70 years) with early-stage breast cancer is an emerging clinical problem in the setting of an ageing population. There is a lack of clinical trial evidence to formulate clinical guidelines for management because of the small number of elderly women included in previous clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. This often results in elderly patients being denied standard management based on age alone. The often-complex interaction between age, comorbid conditions and function complicate the planning and outcomes of surgery and can have an effect on the delivery of postoperative adjuvant therapy. A comprehensive assessment of the elderly patient is essential to determine overall prognosis and morbidity risk from treatments; however, a simple comorbidity scale for use in routine clinical practice remains elusive. Thus, treatment decisions should be tailored to the individual to ensure that therapies are not unduly withheld and are appropriate for the patient's overall condition. The assessment of the elderly patient with breast cancer requires the involvement of a multidisciplinary team. The evidence for efficacy, safety and potential risks of surgery and adjuvant therapies (including radiotherapy, hormone therapy and chemotherapy) in the elderly population is discussed in this review and the role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is outlined.

Reduction in proliferation with six months of letrozole in women on hormone replacement therapy

The objective of this study was to determine if 6 months of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole, administered to postmenopausal women taking a stable dose of hormone replacement remedy, would be safe and would modulate biomarkers of breast cancer risk. The intent was to reduce the proliferation marker Ki-67 while maintaining adequate systemic levels of estradiol so as to avoid perimenopausal symptoms. Postmenopausal women at high risk for development of breast cancer and taking a stable dose of estrogen or estrogen plus progestin were screened by random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA). To be eligible, the acquired breast epithelial cells had to be characterized as cytologic atypia or borderline atypia with > or =1,000 epithelial cells on the cytomorphology slide; plus > or =500 epithelial cells on a slide processed for Ki-67 immunocytochemistry. Forty-two women were enrolled in the one arm study and received 2.5 mg letrozole per day for 6 months, followed by repeat assessment of biomarkers. Ki-67 was reduced by a median relative value of 66%. There was no significant change in breast cell cytomorphology; ER weighted index score; serum estradiol, testosterone, or IGF-1:IGFBP-3 ratio; mammographic breast density, or frequency or severity of perimenopausal symptoms. Given the dramatic reduction in proliferation, the effect of letrozole on risk and response biomarkers should be explored further in a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase IIB breast cancer chemoprevention trial.

The impact of tumor progesterone receptor status on optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest that treatment outcomes with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and/or tamoxifen may differ for tumors that express both the estrogen receptor (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR) (ER+/PR+) compared with those that lack PR expression (ER+/PR-). However, the optimal sequencing of AIs and tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy is not known and may differ for biologic subsets of cancers.

METHODS

Markov models were used to simulate disease-free survival (DFS) separately among postmenopausal women with ER+/PR+ cancers and women with ER+/PR- cancers. By using risk estimates reported from randomized clinical trials, treatment with 5 years of an AI alone with sequential treatment consisting of tamoxifen with crossover to an AI at 2 years was compared.

RESULTS

For women with ER+/PR+ cancers, sequential therapy with tamoxifen followed by crossover to an AI at 2 years yielded modest improvements in 10-year DFS estimates compared with planned AI monotherapy (84.3% vs. 82.2% and 68.8% vs. 64.8% for lymph node-negative and lymph node-positive patients, respectively). However, for women with ER+/PR- cancers, upfront treatment with an AI yielded improved outcomes with 10-year DFS rates of 90.5% and 80.1% for the lymph node-negative and node-positive groups, respectively, compared with 88.2% and 76.1%, respectively, for sequential treatment with tamoxifen followed by an AI.

CONCLUSIONS

Modeling estimates suggested that the optimal endocrine treatment strategy may differ based on the biologic features of breast cancer tumors. Patients with ER+/PR+ tumors achieved optimal 10-year DFS estimates with tamoxifen followed by a crossover to AI therapy, whereas patients with ER+/PR- tumors fared best when they initiated treatment with AI.

The adjuvant endocrine treatment revolution: focus on anastrozole

Anastrozole is a nonsteroidal, third-generation aromatase inhibitor, which is heralded as an effective alternative endocrine therapy to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer. Anastrozole has a high affinity for aromatase, a CYP enzyme involved in estrogen synthesis, and provides effective estrogen suppression with little, if any, impact on other CYP enzymes, lipid profiles or steroidogenesis. The use of anastrozole is now widely accepted in advanced breast cancer and its superior efficacy and tolerability to tamoxifen has recently been demonstrated in early breast cancer.

Trends in endocrine therapy and chemotherapy for early breast cancer: a focus on the premenopausal patient

PURPOSE

The majority of breast cancers are diagnosed at an early stage, and treatment is focused on cure and prolonging disease-free survival. Local therapy (surgery and/or radiation treatment) is standard, along with systemic adjuvant therapy that may effectively prevent or delay relapse and death in early-stage disease. In premenopausal women, adjuvant therapeutic approaches include combination cytotoxic chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) was the established chemotherapy regimen; however, newer regimens have more recently been introduced that may offer some benefit over CMF including anthracycline-containing regimens [e.g. cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil (CEF)], and taxane-containing regimens. For women with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease, a second option is endocrine therapy that aims to suppress mitogenic oestrogen signalling. Until recently, 5 years of tamoxifen was regarded as the standard adjuvant endocrine treatment in ER-positive disease. Ovarian ablation is also effective in premenopausal women, and can be achieved by surgery, radiotherapy, or via the use of a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone analogue such as goserelin. Combining tamoxifen and goserelin treatment provides more effective oestrogen blockade than either drug alone. However, as the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have demonstrated improved efficacy over tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early and advanced disease, combination treatment with goserelin plus an AI may provide optimal oestrogen blockade in premenopausal patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This review assesses the relative merits of chemotherapeutic and endocrine approaches for the treatment of early breast cancer, and summarises relevant ongoing clinical trials, with an emphasis on the premenopausal setting.

Clinical Cancer Advances 2005: major research advances in cancer treatment, prevention, and screening--a report from the American Society of Clinical Oncology

This year, for the first time, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) is publishing Clinical Cancer Advances 2005: Major Research Advances in Cancer Treatment, Prevention, and Screening, an annual review of the most significant clinical research presented or published over the past year across all cancer types. ASCO embarked on this project to provide the public, patients, policymakers, and physicians with an accessible summary of the year's most important research advances. While not intended to serve as a comprehensive review, this report provides a year-end snapshot of research that will have the greatest impact on patient care. As you will read, there is much good news from the front lines of cancer research. These pages report on new chemotherapy regimens that sharply reduce the risk of recurrence for very common cancers; the "coming of age" of targeted cancer therapies; promising studies of drugs to prevent cancer; and improvements in quality of life for people living with the disease, among many other advances. Survival rates for cancer are on the rise, increasing from 50% to 64% over the last 30 years. Cancer still exacts an enormous toll, however. Nearly 1.4 million Americans will be diagnosed this year, and some 570,000 will die of the disease. Clearly, more research is needed to find effective therapies for the most stubborn cancer types and stages. We need to know more about the long-term effects of newer, more targeted cancer therapies, some of which need to be taken over long periods of time. And we need to devote far greater attention to tracking and improving the care of the nearly 10 million cancer survivors in the United States today. Despite these and other challenges, the message of this report is one of hope. Through the dedicated, persistent pursuit of clinical research and participation in clinical trials by people with cancer, we steadily uncover new and better ways of treating, diagnosing, and preventing a disease that touches the lives of so many. I want to thank the Editorial Board members, the Specialty Editors, and the ASCO Cancer Communications Committee for their dedicated work to develop this report, and I hope you find it useful.

Molecular classification and molecular forecasting of breast cancer: ready for clinical application?

Profiling breast cancer with expression arrays has become common, and it has been suggested that the results from early studies will lead to understanding of the molecular differences between clinical cases and allow individualization of care. We critically review two main applications of expression profiling; studies unraveling novel breast cancer classifications and those that aim to identify novel markers for prediction of clinical outcome. Breast cancer may now be subclassified into luminal, basal, and HER2 subtypes with distinct differences in prognosis and response to therapy. However, profiling studies to identify predictive markers have suffered from methodologic problems that prevent general application of their results. Future work will need to reanalyze existing microarray data sets to identify more representative sets of candidate genes for use as prognostic signatures and will need to take into account the new knowledge of molecular subtypes of breast cancer when assessing predictive effects.