1
|
Fayad L, Ansell SM, Advani R, Coiffier B, Stuart R, Bartlett NL, Forero-Torres A, Kuliczkowski K, Belada D, Ng E, Drachman JG. Dacetuzumab plus rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide as salvage therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma relapsing after rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Leuk Lymphoma 2015; 56:2569-78. [PMID: 25651427 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2015.1007504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Single-agent dacetuzumab has demonstrated antitumor activity in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Preclinical data demonstrated improved dacetuzumab antitumor activity in combination with rituximab, ± chemotherapy. We designed a phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide (R-ICE) + dacetuzumab with R-ICE + placebo in patients with DLBCL who relapsed after rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (R-CHOP) (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00529503). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR); additional endpoints included failure-free survival and overall survival (OS). Overall, 151 patients were randomized (75 dacetuzumab, 76 placebo). No notable differences between arms in demographics or subsequent treatment parameters were observed. Cytopenias, cough and infection were more frequent with dacetuzumab. Futility analysis failed to demonstrate higher CR rates with dacetuzumab (36% dacetuzumab, 42% placebo); consequently, enrollment was stopped. Unplanned post hoc analysis showed that patients who underwent subsequent autologous stem cell transplant experienced improvement in OS (hazard ratio = 0.195, p = 0.004), which may be explained by potential immunomodulatory effects of dacetuzumab on antigen-presenting cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Fayad
- a M. D. Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | | | | | | | - Robert Stuart
- e Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston , SC , USA
| | - Nancy L Bartlett
- f Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis , MO , USA
| | | | | | - David Belada
- i Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital , Hradec Králové , Czech Republic
| | - Edmund Ng
- j Edmund Ng Consulting LLC , Seattle , WA , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex immune disorder in which loss of tolerance to nucleic acid antigens and other crossreactive antigens is associated with the development of pathogenic autoantibodies that damage target organs, including the skin, joints, brain and kidney. New drugs based on modulation of the immune system are currently being developed for the treatment of SLE. Many of these new therapies do not globally suppress the immune system but target specific activation pathways relevant to SLE pathogenesis. Immune modulation in SLE is complicated by differences in the immune defects between patients and at different disease stages. Since both deficiency and hyperactivity of the immune system can give rise to SLE, the ultimate goal for SLE therapy is to restore homeostasis without affecting protective immune responses to pathogens. Here we review recent immunological advances that have enhanced our understanding of SLE pathogenesis and discuss how they may lead to the development of new treatment regimens.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The World Health Organization has included different types of lymphoma under the aggressive category. In the US, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most common aggressive lymphoma and accounts for > 30% of the 55,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Recent advances in the knowledge of the molecular biology have provided an increased understanding of the heterogeneity of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. New treatments, especially those with the use of monoclonal antibodies, are improving both the survival and the response rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Fayad
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Box # 429, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reddy GK. Meeting highlights: 5th Annual International Congress on Monoclonal Antibodies in Cancer, August 2005, Quebec City, Canada. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA & MYELOMA 2005; 6:71-6. [PMID: 16231842 DOI: 10.1016/s1557-9190(11)70371-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
|
5
|
Dillman RO. American Society of Clinical Oncology 41st annual meeting. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2005; 5:1117-27. [PMID: 16050788 DOI: 10.1517/14712598.5.8.1117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
For many years the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has been the premier meeting in clinical oncology, and one that is closely scrutinised by Wall Street and international investors because of the economic significance of cancer therapies to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. The area of biologicals and targeted therapies exploded in the late 1990s after the blockbuster results with the monoclonal antibody rituximab in the treatment of lymphoma. Although historically a somewhat conservative organisation that is still closely tied to classical cytotoxic chemotherapy, ASCO has been able to integrate various areas of biological therapy into its scope of clinical activity. Although ASCO still has 'American' in its title, it is really the 'International' Society of Clinical Oncology, as reflected by the attendance at this year's meeting by approximately 30,000, with approximately two-thirds attending from outside the US. There were 9708 abstracts published in conjunction with the meeting, 86 of which are referenced in this review. There were 10 papers chosen for plenary presentations and many other key papers were presented at other oral abstract sessions and poster discussion session that were organised by tumour type. In addition to key papers submitted by specific tumour type, for this year's meeting there were 103 abstracts published in the session entitled 'Developmental Therapeutics: Immunotherapy', and 218 in the session entitled Developmental Therapeutics: Molecular Targets', for a total of 321 biological therapy abstracts compared with only 125 abstracts for the session entitled 'Developmental Therapeutics: Cytotoxic Therapy'. This meeting review is organised by biotherapy modality rather than tumour type.
Collapse
|