Phase II Study of Etoposide and Cisplatin With Concurrent Twice-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy Followed by Irinotecan and Cisplatin in Patients With Limited-Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group 9902

Targeting the mSWI/SNF complex in POU2F-POU2AF transcription factor-driven malignancies

The POU2F3-POU2AF2/3 transcription factor complex is the master regulator of the tuft cell lineage and tuft cell-like small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Here, we identify a specific dependence of the POU2F3 molecular subtype of SCLC (SCLC-P) on the activity of the mammalian switch/sucrose non-fermentable (mSWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex. Treatment of SCLC-P cells with a proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) degrader of mSWI/SNF ATPases evicts POU2F3 and its coactivators from chromatin and attenuates downstream signaling. B cell malignancies which are dependent on the POU2F1/2 cofactor, POU2AF1, are also sensitive to mSWI/SNF ATPase degraders, with treatment leading to chromatin eviction of POU2AF1 and IRF4 and decreased IRF4 signaling in multiple myeloma cells. An orally bioavailable mSWI/SNF ATPase degrader significantly inhibits tumor growth in preclinical models of SCLC-P and multiple myeloma without signs of toxicity. This study suggests that POU2F-POU2AF-driven malignancies have an intrinsic dependence on the mSWI/SNF complex, representing a therapeutic vulnerability.

The Dose/Fractionation Debate in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

To explore the most suitable dosage regimen for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) and provide references for clinical selection, strict inclusion criteria were applied, and studies were screened from Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Subsequently, data on two-year overall survival rates and dosage regimens were collected, and scatter plots were constructed to provide a comprehensive perspective. The survival benefits of various dosage regimens were evaluated, and a linear quadratic equation was utilized to fit the relationship between the biologically effective dose (BED10) and the two-year overall survival rate. Among the five randomized controlled trials, the two-year overall survival rate of ConvTRT regimens with BED10 > 60 Gy (rough value) was only at or below the median of all ConvTRT regimens or all included study regimens, indicating that increasing the number and total dose of ConvTRT does not necessarily lead to better prognosis. In the exploration of HypoTRT regimens, there was a linear positive correlation between BED10 and the two-year overall survival rate (p < 0.0001), while the exploration of HyperTRT regimens was relatively limited, with the majority focused on the 45 Gy/30 F regimen. However, the current 45 Gy/30 F regimen is not sufficient to control LS-SCLC, resulting in a high local recurrence rate. High-dose ConvTRT regimens have long treatment durations and may induce tumor regrowth which may cause reduced efficacy. Under reasonable toxicity reactions, HyperTRT or HypoTRT with higher radiotherapy doses is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.

A pharmacovigilance study of etoposide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database, what does the real world say?

Introduction: Etoposide is a broad-spectrum antitumor drug that has been extensively studied in clinical trials. However, limited information is available regarding its real-world adverse reactions. Therefore, this study aimed to assess and evaluate etoposide-related adverse events in a real-world setting by using data mining method on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods: Through the analysis of 16,134,686 reports in the FAERS database, a total of 9,892 reports of etoposide-related adverse drug events (ADEs) were identified. To determine the significance of these ADEs, various disproportionality analysis algorithms were applied, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms. Results: As a result, 478 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) that were identified by all four algorithms were retained. These PTs included commonly reported adverse events such as thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, anemia, stomatitis, and pneumonitis, which align with those documented in the drug's instructions and previous clinical trials. However, our analysis also uncovered unexpected and significant ADEs, including thrombotic microangiopathy, ototoxicity, second primary malignancy, nephropathy toxic, and ovarian failure. Furthermore, we examined the time-to-onset (TTO) of these ADEs using the Weibull distribution test and found that the median TTO for etoposide-associated ADEs was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2-32 days). The majority of cases occurred within the first month (73.8%) after etoposide administration. Additionally, our analysis revealed specific high-risk signals for males, such as pneumonia and cardiac infarction, while females showed signals for drug resistance and ototoxicity. Discussion: These findings provide valuable insight into the occurrence of ADEs following etoposide initiation, which can potentially support clinical monitoring and risk identification efforts.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in the magnetic resonance imaging era

BACKGROUND

We investigated the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) according to tumor response in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) era.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with LS-SCLC without brain metastases (BMs) on MRI who achieved either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after initial chemoradiotherapy at our center from 2006 to 2017.

RESULTS

This study comprised 116 patients (median age, 58 years; men, 92; women, 24). After initial chemoradiotherapy, 53 patients achieved CR, while 63 patients achieved PR. Eighty-three patients received PCI. Patients who received PCI had better overall survival (OS, 5-year: 52.5% vs. 35.1%; p = 0.012) and progression-free survival (PFS, 5-year: 45.0% vs. 28.2%; p = 0.001) and a lower incidence of BMs (5-year: 18.3% vs. 39.4%; p = 0.010). In the subgroup analysis, PCI improved OS (5-year: 67.8% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.005) and PFS (5-year: 65.2% vs. 35.0%, p = 0.021) and decreased BM risk (5-year: 12.1% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.002) for patients with CR. However, PCI had no benefit (5-year OS: 40.5% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.763; 5-year BMs: 24.6% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.561) for patients with PR.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor response remained an important factor for selecting patients for PCI in the MRI era. PCI should be recommended for patients with LS-SCLC who achieve CR after initial thoracic chemoradiotherapy.

Radiotherapy Fraction in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 8006 Reconstructed Individual Patient Data

The optimal thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) dose and fractionation for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) using modern techniques remain unclear. We conducted systematic review and meta-analyses of the efficacy and safety differences between definitive hypofractionated TRT (HypoTRT), conventional TRT (ConvTRT) and hyperfractionated TRT (HyperTRT), especially in the modern era. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), real-world cohorts, and single-arm trials published between 1990 and 2021 were identified. Two meta-analyses of overall survival (OS) were conducted: (i) a random-effects meta-analysis based on reconstructed individual-patient data (IPD) of all studies; and (ii) a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on study-level aggregated data (AD) of RCTs. The incidences of severe radiation-related toxicities were compared using the random-effects meta-regression model. Overall, 53 of the 30,031 publications met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 8006 IPD were reconstructed. After adjusting for key treatment variables and stratification by study type, there were no significant differences in the OS rates between the altered fractionation regimens (HypoTRT vs. HyperTRT, aHR [adjusted HR] = 1.05, 95% CI 0.93-1.19; ConvTRT vs. HyperTRT, aHR = 1.00, 95% CI 0·90-1.11; HypoTRT vs. ConvTRT, aHR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.20). In the modern era, the survival outcomes of all three schedules, while remaining comparable, have improved significantly. Results of the AD-based network meta-analysis were consistent with those of IPD analysis, and HypoTRT was ranked as the best regimen (SUCRA = 81%). There were no significant differences in toxicities between groups when using modern radiation techniques. In the modern era, no significant differences in OS or severe radiation-related toxicities were observed between altered schedules in LS-SCLC. HypoTRT may be associated with moderate and non-significant OS improvements, which should be further confirmed in prospective randomized phase III trials.

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder

Background

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study

Background

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly proliferative, rapidly growing tumor with a poor prognosis, even in cases of limited disease (LD). Timely and accurate high-intensity therapy is necessary. For concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), etoposide/platinum (EP)-based regimens are recommended, although irinotecan/platinum (IP)-based regimens are also effective with radiotherapy. This large-scale, retrospective, nationwide cohort study aimed to analyze the efficacy of CCRT in patients with LD-SCLC.

Methods

Population data registered between January 2008 and December 2018 was extracted from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service of Korea database. Survival outcomes of 4446 LD-SCLC patients who received CCRT were analyzed.

Results

Patients who received EP-CCRT (n = 4187) showed better time to first subsequent therapy (TFST: 11.2 months) and overall survival (OS: 22.2 months) than those who received IP-CCRT (n = 259; TFST: 9.6 months, P = 0.0477; OS: 16.4 months, P <  0.0001). When CCRT failed, dual-agent chemotherapy (n = 925; OS: 9.1 months) provided a better survival benefit than single-agent chemotherapy (n = 815; OS: 7.5 months). IP-based chemotherapy resulted in better OS (9.6 months) than EP-based chemotherapy (7.1 months, P = 0.017) in platinum-resistant relapsed patients; the opposite was observed for platinum-sensitive relapsed patients (OS: EP, 17.2 months; IP, 6.6 months; P <  0.0001). Poisson regression analysis demonstrated that age, EP-CCRT, and hypercholesterolemia retained significant associations with OS after adjustment for all variables.

Conclusion

In the Korean population, the effects of EP-CCRT on OS and TFST are significantly more favorable than those of IP-CCRT.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08082-2.

A retrospective study of definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for resectable small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus (SCNEC-E) remains to be established.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 7 consecutive patients with resectable SCNEC-E who received definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) to evaluate the safety and efficacy. Treatment consisted of two courses of chemotherapy with cisplatin (80 mg/m² on day 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m² on days 1-3) or carboplatin (AUC 5 on day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m² on days 1-3) given every 4 weeks during dCRT. The total radiation dose was 50.4 Gy (28 fractions).

RESULTS

The clinical stage was IA in 1 patient, IB in 2 patients, IIA in 3 patients, and IIB in 1 patient. Definitive CRT was completed in all patients. The median overall treatment time of radiotherapy was 44 days. The chemotherapy regimen included in dCRT was cisplatin and etoposide in 3 patients and carboplatin and etoposide in 4 patients. Acute adverse events of grade 3 or 4 were neutropenia 100%, thrombocytopenia 43%, febrile neutropenia 43%, and nausea 14%. There were no late grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The median survival time was 32 months. The complete response rate was 100%. The recurrence rate was 43%. The median survival of the 4 patients without recurrence was 56 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Definitive CRT with cisplatin and etoposide or carboplatin and etoposide is a feasible treatment for the resectable SCNEC-E, and long-term survival can be achieved in some patients.

Heterogeneous tumor features and treatment outcome between males and females with lung cancer (LC): Do gender and sex matter?

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, despite a decreasing incidence rate in recent years, especially in men. Most risk factors for LC could be linked to an individual's reproductive system and secondary sex characteristics ('sex-related') and/or to some physical, behavioral and personality traits ('gender-related') peculiar to males rather than females or vice versa. An imbalance of these etiologic factors could explain why some LC features may differ between sexes. For this review, an extended literature data collection was performed, using keywords to identify 'sex/gender' and 'LC'. Differences between genders in LC epidemiology, pathological and molecular characteristics, loco-regional and/or systemic treatments outcome and prognosis were systematically analyzed. The possible predictive role of physio-pathological factors in males and females paves the way for a personalized therapeutic approach, emphasizing the need to include gender as a stratification factor in future clinical trials design.

Dose Escalation Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy With the Use of Involved-field Conformal Radiotherapy and Accelerated Hyperfractionation in Combination With Cisplatin and Vinorelbine Chemotherapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The Final Report

OBJECTIVES

A phase I study to determine a recommended dose of thoracic radiotherapy using accelerated hyperfractionation for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer was conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used chemotherapy of a cisplatin doublet and 2 dose levels of radiation with accelerated hyperfractionation. The radiation dose levels were: a total dose of 60 Gy in 40 fractions at level 1, and 66 Gy in 44 fractions at level 2. Eligible patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer received cisplatin and vinorelbine. Radiation therapy started on day 2 of chemotherapy and was delivered twice daily for 5 days a week.

RESULTS

Total 12 patients were enrolled, with 6 patients each at dose levels 1 and 2. Dose-limiting toxicity was noted in 2 patients at level 1; one patient had grade 3 febrile neutropenia and the other patient had grade 3 esophagitis. No dose-limiting toxicity was noted in the 6 patients at level 2. Grade 3 to 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia were noted in 11 (92%), 9 (75%), and 8 (67%) of the total 12 patients, respectively. Grade 3 anorexia and infection were noted in 2 patients (17%) at each level. Grade 3 nausea, fatigue, esophagitis, and febrile neutropenia were noted in 1 patient (8%) at each level. The response rate in the total 12 patients was 83.3%. The median progression-free survival time and the median overall survival time were 10.7 and 24.2 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sixty-six gray in 44 fractions is the recommended dose for the following phase II study.

[Phase I Study of Etoposide and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Dose Escalation with Concurrent Twice-daily Radiotherapy for Patients with Limited-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer]

背景与目的

加速超分割放疗（每日两次方案）联合EP方案同步化疗是美国国立综合癌症网络（National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN）指南推荐的局限期小细胞肺癌的标准治疗方式，但国人对EP方案标准化疗剂量耐受性尚不明确。本研究旨在探讨局限期小细胞肺癌同步放化疗EP方案的最大耐受剂量。

方法

研究纳入病理证实的局限期小细胞肺癌患者，进行加速超分割放疗同步EP方案（依托泊苷+顺铂）化疗，放疗处方剂量为45 Gy/30 f，1.5 Gy/f，每日两次，同一日两次放疗间隔时间≥6 h，5天/周，共3周完成。化疗方案采用依托泊苷联合顺铂，每21天为1周期，具体依托泊苷100 mg/m²，d1-d3，顺铂采用剂量递增的方式（第1组为70 mg/m² d1，第2组为75 mg/m² d1）。主要观察指标为治疗期间的血液学毒性。次要观察指标为非血液学毒性和1年总生存期（overall survival, OS）、无进展生存期（progression free survival, PFS）。根据不良事件常用术语评定标准（Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, NCI-CTCAE）4.0，最大耐受剂量设定为6例患者中不超过1例患者出现剂量限制毒性（4级血液学毒性）的剂量，同时下一剂量组6例患者至少2例出现剂量限制性毒性。

结果

研究共纳入20例局限期小细胞肺癌患者，平均年龄49.50（30-68）岁。第1组入组6例患者，1例患者出现4度中性粒细胞减少；后第2组入组14例患者，1例患者出现4度中性粒细胞减少。其中，第1组有4例患者出现≥3度血液学毒性，1例患者出现3度以上放射性食管炎；第2组有10例患者出现≥3度血液学毒性，无患者出现3度以上放射性食管炎。中位随访9.0个月（3.2个月-36.2个月），1年OS、PFS分别为91%、62%。

结论

局限期小细胞肺癌患者采用加速超分割放疗联合EP方案化疗将顺铂剂量递增至75 mg/m²是安全的，其有效性还需要进一步扩大样本量和随访更长的时间来证实。

Consolidation chemotherapy improves progression-free survival in stage III small-cell lung cancer following concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). However, the efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) in LD-SCLC remains controversial despite several studies that were performed in the early years of CCT use. The aim of this study was to reevaluate the effectiveness and toxicities associated with CCT.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis evaluated 177 patients with stage IIIA and IIIB small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who underwent CCRT from January 2001 to December 2013 at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze patient prognosis factors.

RESULTS

Among the 177 patients, 72 (41%) received CCT and 105 (59%) did not receive CCT. PFS was significantly better for patients in the CCT group compared to that for patients in the non-CCT group (median PFS: 17.0 vs 12.9 months, respectively, P=0.031), whereas the differences in OS were not statistically significant (median OS: 31.6 vs 24.8 months, respectively, P=0.118). The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 33.3% and 20.8% for patients in the CCT group and 27.6% and 6.7% for patients in the non-CCT group, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that having a pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level <5 ng/mL (P=0.035), having undergone prophylactic cranial irradiation (P<0.001), and having received CCT (P=0.002) could serve as favorable independent prognostic factors for PFS. Multivariate analysis for OS also showed that having undergone PCI (P<0.001) and having received CCT (P=0.006) were independent significant prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

CCT can improve PFS for patients with stage IIIA and IIIB SCLC following CCRT without significantly increasing treatment-related toxicities.

Feasibility study of chemoradiotherapy followed by amrubicin and cisplatin for limited-disease small cell lung cancer

To evaluate the feasibility of amrubicin plus cisplatin (AP) following chemoradiotherapy for limited‐disease small‐cell lung cancer, chemo‐naïve patients aged 20–70 years with a performance status of 0 or 1 and normal organ functions were treated with etoposide 100 mg/m² on days 1–3, cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1 and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy at 45 Gy/30 fractions (EP‐TRT), followed by three cycles of amrubicin 40 mg/m² on days 1–3 and cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 1 every 3 weeks. The EP‐TRT could be completed in 21 patients (15 male and 6 female patients with a median age of 62 years). Of these, 2, 1 and 18 (86%) patients received one, two and three cycles of AP, respectively. Sixteen (76%) patients required granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) support. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in all patients. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was observed in 9 patients, lasting for 1 day in 5 patients. The incidences of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and anemia were 43 and 24%, respectively. Grade 3 infection and anorexia occurred in 2 and 3 patients, respectively. The response rate was 95%. The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) progression‐free survival (PFS) was 41.9 (0–102) months, and the 5‐year PFS rate (CI) was 41.9% (20.4–63.4%). The median overall survival (OS) has not been reached yet, and the 5‐year OS rate (CI) was 57.8% (35.2–80.4%). In conclusion, EP‐TRT followed by AP therapy was well‐tolerated, although a large number of patients required G‐CSF support.

Is neoadjuvant chemotherapy mandatory for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer?

OBJECTIVES

The present study attempted to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgery in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 106 LD-SCLC patients who underwent complete resections from February 2000 to February 2012 in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Among these cases, two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapies were administered to all pathologically confirmed patients [Group Neoadjuvant (Group N)]. For those without pathology, operations followed by adjuvant chemotherapies were performed [Group Adjuvant (Group A)]. Prognostic features and overall survival (OS) were compared using the log-rank test and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Group N included 47 cases and Group A included 59 cases. A total of 57 patients were male and 49 were female, with a mean age of 56.1 ± 10.2 years. A total of 41 patients were at pathological stage (p-Stage) IIIa, and 65 patients were at I or II. The overall 5-year survival rate (5-YS) was 28%. The 5-YS for p-Stage I-II (n = 65) was significantly better than that of p-Stage III (n = 41) (35 vs 20%, P = 0.034). For p-Stage IIIa (pN2 positive), the 5-YS of Group N was significantly better than that of Group A (34 vs 12%, P = 0.020). The median overall survival for Group N and Group A in IIIa (pN2 positive) LD-SCLC patients were 46 and 15 months (P = 0.009), respectively. Multivariate analysis for survival showed mediastinal lymph node involvement; surgery and histopathology of SCLC were both significant independent predictors of long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with surgery provided reasonable options for pIIIa-N2 LD-SCLC patients, which can give them a better chance of survival.

Efficacy of chemotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 13% of all lung cancers, and limited-disease SCLC is defined as a disease that can be encompassed within a tolerable radiation field. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is considered to be the standard treatment for limited-disease SCLC. In both concurrent and consolidation chemoradiotherapies, the combination of etoposide and cisplatin is considered to be a standard chemotherapy regimen. To develop novel treatment for SCLC, several clinical trials of molecular-targeted therapy or immunotherapy have been reported. However, no molecular-targeted drug has shown clinical activity in limited-disease SCLC. In future studies, understanding the molecular profile of SCLC will be necessary for the development of molecular-targeted therapies for SCLC. This review provides an overview of chemotherapy regimens for limited-disease SCLC.

Phase II study of induction cisplatin and irinotecan followed by concurrent carboplatin, etoposide, and thoracic radiotherapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, CALGB 30206

INTRODUCTION

We sought to determine the efficacy of using both irinotecan- and etoposide-containing regimens sequentially for patients with untreated limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with untreated, measurable, limited-stage small-cell lung cancer with performance status 0 to 2, and adequate organ function were eligible. Treatment consisted of induction with cisplatin 30 mg/m and irinotecan 65 mg/m intravenously on day 1 and 8, every 21 days for two cycles. Beginning day 43, daily chest irradiation to 70 Gy was administered concurrently with carboplatin area under curve 5 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m on days 1 to 3, every 21 days for three cycles. The primary objective was to differentiate between 45% and 60% 2-year survival.

RESULTS

Two induction cycles were delivered to 72 of 75 eligible patients (96%) and all planned treatment was delivered to 59 patients (79%). Cisplatin and irinotecan induction chemotherapy resulted in complete responses in 7% and partial responses in 64% (response rate 71%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 59%-81%). The best response to all therapy included 88% complete or partial responses (95% CI, 78%-94%). With median follow-up of 57 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival are 12.6 (95% CI, 9.4-14.7) and 18.1 months (15.8-22.9), respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival was 69% and 31%, respectively. Frequent (>20%) grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia in 84%, hemoglobin in 36%, platelets in 51%, esophagitis in 22%, and dehydration in 24%. There were no fatal toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

This treatment regimen of irinotecan-cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by 70 Gy concurrent radiation and etoposide-carboplatin had tolerable toxicity but did not meet the preplanned 2-year survival target for further development.

Phase II study of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course radiotherapy in limited-disease small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan and cisplatin are one of active regimens for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). To determine the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan and cisplatin with concurrent split-course thoracic radiotherapy in limited-disease (LD) SCLC, we conducted a phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients fulfilling the following eligibility criteria were enrolled: chemotherapy-naïve, good performance status (PS 0-1), age ≤75, LD-SCLC, and adequate organ function. The patients received irinotecan 40 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15, and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1. Four cycles of chemotherapy were repeated every 4 weeks. Split-course thoracic radiotherapy of once-daily 2 Gy/day commenced on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle, with 26 and 24 Gy administered in the first and second cycles, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were eligible and assessable for response, toxicity, and survival. Patients' characteristics were as follows: male/female = 29/5; PS 0/1 = 18/16; median age (range) = 67 (50-73); and stage IB/IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB = 2/2/3/16/11. The overall response was 100 % (CR 8, PR 26). Grade 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, grade 3-5 pneumonitis, diarrhea, and esophagitis occurred in 24, 38, 6, 3, and 0 %, respectively. There were 2 treatment-related deaths from pneumonitis. The median time to tumor progression was 14.3 months. The median overall survival time and the 2- and 5-year survival rates were 44.5 months, 66.7 and 46.1 %, respectively. No tumor progression was observed in patients with CR.

CONCLUSION

Irinotecan plus cisplatin with concurrent split-course thoracic radiotherapy was effective and tolerable in untreated LD-SCLC.

Chemoradiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY Systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for small-cell lung cancer. A third of small-cell lung cancer patients present with limited disease; in this population, thoracic radiotherapy caused a 14% reduction in the mortality rate, and benefit in terms of overall survival at 3 years was 5.4% as compared with chemotherapy alone. Although the optimal schedule and volume of thoracic radiotherapy remain controversial, early twice-daily concurrent radiotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin is recommended. Prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended for patients with any response to first-line treatment. Maintenance and dose-intense treatment is not recommended outside of clinical trials. Large randomized trials that compare standard-dose radiation therapy of 45 Gy in twice-daily fractions for 3 weeks with once-daily schedules with a higher total dose are ongoing. The incorporation of new drugs is warranted for future combined modality treatment.

Small-cell lung cancer

The incidence and mortality of small-cell lung cancer worldwide make this disease a notable health-care issue. Diagnosis relies on histology, with the use of immunohistochemical studies to confirm difficult cases. Typical patients are men older than 70 years who are current or past heavy smokers and who have pulmonary and cardiovascular comorbidities. Patients often present with rapid-onset symptoms due to local intrathoracic tumour growth, extrapulmonary distant spread, paraneoplastic syndromes, or a combination of these features. Staging aims ultimately to define disease as metastatic or non-metastatic. Combination chemotherapy, generally platinum-based plus etoposide or irinotecan, is the mainstay first-line treatment for metastatic small-cell lung cancer. For non-metastatic disease, evidence supports early concurrent thoracic radiotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation should be considered for patients with or without metastases whose disease does not progress after induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Despite high initial response rates, most patients eventually relapse. Except for topotecan, few treatment options then remain. Signalling pathways have been identified that might yield new drug targets.

Irinotecan plus cisplatin chemotherapy followed by concurrent thoracic irradiation with low-dose weekly cisplatin for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

A phase II trial of irinotecan and cisplatin (IP) as induction chemotherapy followed by conventional thoracic irradiation concurrent with low-dose weekly cisplatin for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LDS-SCLC). Between February 2005 and December 2008, 34 chemotherapy-naïve patients with LD-SCLC were enrolled. Treatment consisted of two 21-day cycles of cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 8 followed by conventional thoracic irradiation at a dose of 54 Gy concurrent with cisplatin at dose of 20 mg/m(2) weekly then prophylactic cranial irradiation at dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions for those achieved complete or partial response. Only 33 patients received the treatment protocol, and they were assessed for response and toxicity. After induction chemotherapy, overall response rate was (72.73%). After median follow-up of 27 months, the median survival was 25 months (95% CI, 21.249-28.751) with 1 and 2-year overall survival rates of 83 and 55%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months (95% CI, 10.311-19.689) with a 1- and 2-year PFS of 59 and 38%, respectively. The most common toxicities during induction chemotherapy were neutropenia (81%), thrombocytopenia (69%), and diarrhea (63%) while esophagitis (84%) and pneumonitis (30%) were the most common toxicities during concurrent chemo-radiation. Relapse rate was 61% with distant metastasis in 42% and local recurrence in 26%. This protocol of induction irinotecon-based regimen followed by delayed concurrent thoracic irradiation with low-dose weekly cisplatin is effective with acceptable toxicities. Based on the favorable outcome in this trial, this regimen should be evaluated in a large phase III trial.

High tumor metabolic activity as measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is associated with poor prognosis in limited and extensive stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated the prognostic effect of incorporating metabolic assessment by (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) into a conventional staging system in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Seventy-six consecutive patients with pathologically proven SCLC were enrolled. All patients underwent standard treatment after pretreatment (18)F-FDG-PET/CT scanning. The mean values of maximal standardized uptake values (meanSUV(max)) of the malignant lesions upon (18)F-FDG-PET/CT were calculated. The Cox proportional hazards model was used with performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, stage, and meanSUV(max).

RESULTS

Patients with high meanSUV(max) were significantly related with the established poor prognostic factors, such as higher lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.04) and extensive disease (ED; P = 0.01). Furthermore, in multivariate analysis, patients with high meanSUV(max) were associated with poor survival outcomes compared with patients with low meanSUV(max) [adjusted hazard ratio, 3.74; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.67-8.37; P = 0.001, for death and adjusted hazard ratio, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.21-4.17; P = 0.01 for recurrence/progression]. In subgroup analysis, limited disease (LD) with high meanSUV(max) showed significantly shorter overall survival than LD with low meanSUV(max) [high versus low meanSUV(max), 20.1 months (95% CI, 7.9-23.2) versus 35.3 months (95% CI, 27.6-42.9); P = 0.02]. ED with high meanSUV(max) had significantly shorter overall survival than ED with low meanSUV(max) [high versus low meanSUV(max), 9.5 months (95% CI, 4.9-13.9) versus 17.7 months (95% CI, 12.0-20.1); P = 0.007]. These findings were replicated in progression-free survival analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In SCLC, tumor metabolic activity as assessed by FDG-PET is a significant prognostic factor and identifies subgroups of patients at higher risk of death in both LD and ED SCLC.

SCLC extensive disease--treatment guidance by extent or/and biology of response?

In extensive disease of small cell lung cancer a doubling of the one-year-survival rate was reported in August 2007 by prophylactic cranial irradiation applied to patients who experienced any response to initial chemotherapy. We discuss the treatment concept of extensive disease in the face of the latest results and older studies with additional thoracic irradiation in this subgroup. A randomized trial with prophylactic cranial irradiation published in 1999 demonstrated an improvement of 5-year-overall-survival for complete responders (at least at distant levels) receiving additional thoracic radiochemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone (9.1% vs. 3.7%). But, these results were almost neglected and thoracic radiotherapy was not further investigated for good responders of extensive disease. However, in the light of current advances by prophylactic cranial irradiation these findings are noteworthy on all accounts. Considering both, a possible interpretation of these data could be a survival benefit of local control by simultaneous thoracic radiochemotherapy in the case of improved distant control due to chemotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation. Furthermore the question arises whether the tumor biology indicated by the response to chemotherapy should be integrated in the present classification.

Small cell lung cancer: have we made any progress over the last 25 years?

Twenty-five years ago, small cell lung cancer was widely considered to be the next cancer added to the list of "curable cancers." This article attempts to summarize the progress made toward that goal since then. Clinical trials have provided landmarks in the therapy of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). These are: (a) the proof that thoracic radiation therapy adds to systemic chemotherapy, (b) the superiority of twice-daily radiation therapy over daily fractionation, and (c) the need for prophylactic central nervous system radiation (prophylactic cranial irradiation). Each of these innovations adds about 5%-10% to the overall survival rate. In extensive-stage disease, irinotecan plus cisplatin may be a possible alternative to the "standard" etoposide-cisplatin chemotherapy doublet, but there has been little progress otherwise. It is imperative that, whenever possible, patients be given the opportunity to participate in future clinical trials so that the survival for these patients can continue to improve.