The medical and economic roles of pipeline pharmacogenetics: Alzheimer's disease as a model of efficacy and HLA-B(*)5701 as a model of safety

Pharmacogenetics (PGX) is the study of drug response as a function of an individual's DNA. PGX is often viewed as an extension of disease association genetics, and although this information may be related, it is not the study of drug response. Although medicines are used to treat diseases, the value of strategies that identify and incorporate DNA biomarkers associated with clinical efficacy, or DNA biomarkers for untoward clinical responses, can be applied directly to pharmaceutical pipelines. The growth of adverse event PGX studies involving marketed medicines generally uses relatively large numbers of affected patients, but has been productive. However, the two critical strategies for pipeline genetics must make use of fewer patients: (1) the early identification of efficacy signals so that they can be applied early in development for targeted therapies and (2) identification of safety signals that can subsequently be validated prospectively during development using the least number of patients with adverse responses. Assumptions are often made that large numbers of patients are necessary to recognize PGX hypotheses and to validate DNA biomarkers. In some ways, pipeline pharmacogenetics may be viewed as the opposite of current genome-wide scanning designs. The goal is to obtain PGX signals in as few patients as possible, and then validate PGX hypotheses for specificity and sensitivity as development trials go forward--not using hundreds of thousand of markers to detect strong linkage disequilibrium signals in thousands of patients and their controls. Drug development takes 5-7 years for a drug candidate to traverse to registration--and this is similar to the timeframe for validating genetic biomarkers using sequential clinical trials. Two important examples are discussed, the association of APOE genotypes to the demonstration of actionable efficacy signals for the use of rosiglitazone for Alzheimer's disease; and the identification of HLA-B(*)5701 as a highly sensitive and specific predictive marker for abacavir treated patients who will develop hypersensitivity syndrome (HSS). The rosiglitazone study prevented pipeline attrition by changing the interpretation of a critical Phase IIB proof of concept study (2005) from a failed study, to a positive efficacy response in a genetically predictable proportion of patients. Now, three years later, a Phase III program of clinical trials using pharmacogenetic designs is months away from completion (late08). If successfully registered (early09), millions of patients could benefit, and efficacy PGX would have achieved its first prospective block-buster. The use of safety candidate gene association genetics in patients who received abacavir therapy and developed HSS starting in 1998 culminated in a double blind clinical trial that determined sensitivity > 97% and specificity >99% in 2007. Clinical consensus panels rapidly recommended abacavir as the preferred therapy along with HLA-B(*)5701 pre-testing, immediately increasing the market share of abacavir with respect to other reverse transcriptases that are associated with there own adverse events. Targeting of medicines during drug development is now possible, practical, and profitable.

Pharmacogenetics in drug discovery and development: a translational perspective

The ability to predict a patient's drug response on the basis of their genetic information is expected to decrease attrition during the development of new, innovative drugs, and reduce adverse events by being able to predict individual patients at risk. Most pharmacogenetic investigations have focused on drug-metabolism genes or candidate genes that are thought to be involved in specific diseases. However, robust new genetic tools now enable researchers to carry out multi-candidate gene-association and genome-wide studies for target discovery and drug development. Despite the expanding role of pharmacogenetics in industry, however, there is a paucity of published data. New forms of effective and efficient collaboration between industry and academia that may enhance the systematic collection of pharmacogenetic data are necessary to establish genetic profiles related to drug response, confirm pharmacogenetic associations and expedite the development of new drugs and diagnostic tests.

The role of efflux and uptake transporters in [N-{3-chloro-4-[(3-fluorobenzyl)oxy]phenyl}-6-[5-({[2-(methylsulfonyl)ethyl]amino}methyl)-2-furyl]-4-quinazolinamine (GW572016, lapatinib) disposition and drug interactions

Lapatinib [N-{3-chloro-4-[(3-fluorobenzyl)oxy]phenyl}-6-[5-({[2-(methylsulfonyl)ethyl]amino}methyl)-2-furyl]-4-quinazolinamine, GW572016, Tykerb] is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for use in combination with capecitabine to treat advanced or metastatic breast cancers overexpressing HER2 (ErbB2). In this work we investigated the role of efflux and uptake transporters in lapatinib disposition and drug interactions. In vitro studies evaluated whether lapatinib is a substrate for efflux transporters or an inhibitor of efflux/uptake transporters. In vivo studies included whole-body autoradiography and an evaluation of the role of efflux transporters on the intestinal absorption and brain penetration of lapatinib using chemical or genetic knockout animals. Lapatinib is a substrate for the efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). Furthermore, lapatinib is an inhibitor (IC(50) values 0.025-5 muM) of Pgp, BCRP, and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (a hepatic uptake transporter). In contrast, lapatinib yielded little inhibition on renal transporters (organic anion transporters, organic cation transporters, and uric acid transporter). In vivo studies demonstrated that brain concentrations of lapatinib were low and influenced by efflux transporters at the blood-brain barrier. In contrast, systemic exposure of lapatinib after oral dosing was unchanged when efflux by Pgp and BCRP was absent from the gastrointestinal tract. These in vitro and in vivo preclinical investigations provide a mechanistic basis for elucidating clinical drug interactions.

Lapatinib: a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a clinical role in breast cancer

Lapatinib is a dual (ErbB-1 and ErB-2) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. It shows synergy with trastuzumab, and has demonstrated clinical activity in trastuzumab-resistant tumour. This paper reviews the drug development of lapatinib from preclinical studies to the pivotal Phase III trial and ongoing clinical studies. Areas of interest include the advantages of small molecule TKIs versus antibodies in targeting HER receptors and the efficacy of lapatinib in the treatment of cerebral metastases. The surprisingly high response rate in inflammatory breast cancer raises the possibility of other novel predictive biomarkers. The potential for combination and sequencing with other biological and cytotoxic agents is both exciting and challenging.