Prognostic value of P-glycoprotein in high-grade osteosarcoma

Phase 2 study for nonmetastatic extremity high-grade osteosarcoma in pediatric and adolescent and young adult patients with a risk-adapted strategy based on ABCB1/P-glycoprotein expression: An Italian Sarcoma Group trial (ISG/OS-2)

Background

According to retrospective osteosarcoma series, ABCB1/P‐glycoprotein (Pgp) overexpression predicts for poor outcomes. A prospective trial to assess a risk‐adapted treatment strategy using mifamurtide in Pgp+ patients was performed.

Methods

This was a phase 2, multicenter, uncontrolled trial including patients 40 years old or younger with nonmetastatic extremity high‐grade osteosarcoma stratified according to Pgp expression. All patients received high‐dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MAP) preoperatively. In Pgp+ patients, mifamurtide was added postoperatively and combined with MAP for a good histologic response (necrosis ≥ 90%; good responders [GRs]) or with high‐dose ifosfamide (HDIFO) at 3 g/m²/d on days 1 to 5 for a histologic response < 90% (poor responders [PRs]). Pgp– patients received MAP postoperatively. After an amendment, the cumulative dose of methotrexate was increased from 60 to 120 g/m² (from 5 to 10 courses). The primary end point was event‐free survival (EFS). A postamendment analysis was performed.

Results

In all, 279 patients were recruited, and 194 were included in the postamendment analysis: 70 (36%) were Pgp–, and 124 (64%) were Pgp+. The median follow‐up was 51 months. For Pgp+ patients, 5‐year EFS after definitive surgery (null hypothesis, 40%) was 69.8% (90% confidence interval [CI], 62.2%‐76.2%): 59.8% in PRs and 83.7% in GRs. For Pgp– patients, the 5‐year EFS rate was 66.4% (90% CI, 55.6%‐75.1%).

Conclusions

This study showed that adjuvant mifamurtide, combined with HDIFO for a poor response to induction chemotherapy, could improve EFS in Pgp+ patients. Overall, the outcomes compared favorably with previous series. Mifamurtide and HDIFO as salvage chemotherapy are worth further study.

The expression of ABCB1/P‐glycoprotein (Pgp) at diagnosis has been used to stratify patients with high‐grade osteosarcoma. Adjuvant mifamurtide, combined with high‐dose ifosfamide for a poor response to induction chemotherapy, can improve event‐free survival in Pgp+ patients.

Impact of ABC Transporters in Osteosarcoma and Ewing's Sarcoma: Which Are Involved in Chemoresistance and Which Are Not?

The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily consists of several proteins with a wide repertoire of functions. Under physiological conditions, ABC transporters are involved in cellular trafficking of hormones, lipids, ions, xenobiotics, and several other molecules, including a broad spectrum of chemical substrates and chemotherapeutic drugs. In cancers, ABC transporters have been intensely studied over the past decades, mostly for their involvement in the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype. This review provides an overview of ABC transporters, both related and unrelated to MDR, which have been studied in osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma. Since different backbone drugs used in first-line or rescue chemotherapy for these two rare bone sarcomas are substrates of ABC transporters, this review particularly focused on studies that have provided findings that have been either translated to clinical practice or have indicated new candidate therapeutic targets; however, findings obtained from ABC transporters that were not directly involved in drug resistance were also discussed, in order to provide a more complete overview of the biological impacts of these molecules in osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma. Finally, therapeutic strategies and agents aimed to circumvent ABC-mediated chemoresistance were discussed to provide future perspectives about possible treatment improvements of these neoplasms.

Drug Resistance in Osteosarcoma: Emerging Biomarkers, Therapeutic Targets and Treatment Strategies

Simple Summary

Despite the adoption of aggressive, multimodal treatment schedules, the cure rate of high-grade osteosarcoma (HGOS) has not significantly improved in the last 30 years. The most relevant problem preventing improvement in HGOS prognosis is drug resistance. Therefore, validated novel biomarkers that help to identify those patients who could benefit from innovative treatment options and the development of drugs enabling personalized therapeutic protocols are necessary. The aim of this review was to give an overview on the most relevant emerging drug resistance-related biomarkers, therapeutic targets and new agents or novel candidate treatment strategies, which have been highlighted and suggested for HGOS to improve the success rate of clinical trials.

Abstract

High-grade osteosarcoma (HGOS), the most common primary malignant tumor of bone, is a highly aggressive neoplasm with a cure rate of approximately 40–50% in unselected patient populations. The major clinical problems opposing the cure of HGOS are the presence of inherent or acquired drug resistance and the development of metastasis. Since the drugs used in first-line chemotherapy protocols for HGOS and clinical outcome have not significantly evolved in the past three decades, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic biomarkers and targeted treatment strategies, which may increase the currently available spectrum of cure modalities. Unresponsive or chemoresistant (refractory) HGOS patients usually encounter a dismal prognosis, mostly because therapeutic options and drugs effective for rescue treatments are scarce. Tailored treatments for different subgroups of HGOS patients stratified according to drug resistance-related biomarkers thus appear as an option that may improve this situation. This review explores drug resistance-related biomarkers, therapeutic targets and new candidate treatment strategies, which have emerged in HGOS. In addition to consolidated biomarkers, specific attention has been paid to the role of non-coding RNAs, tumor-derived extracellular vesicles, and cancer stem cells as contributors to drug resistance in HGOS, in order to highlight new candidate markers and therapeutic targets. The possible use of new non-conventional drugs to overcome the main mechanisms of drug resistance in HGOS are finally discussed.

The pharmacogenomics of osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma (OS), the most common malignant tumor of bone, is presently treated with multidrug neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols, which allow to cure 60-65% of patients but also induce toxicity events that cannot be predicted or efficiently prevented. The identification and validation of pharmacogenomic biomarkers is, therefore, absolutely warranted to provide the bases for planning personalized treatments with the aim to increase the therapeutic benefits and to avoid or limit unnecessary toxicities. As several targeted therapies against molecular and immunological markers in OS are presently under clinical investigation, it may be speculated that some new agents for innovative treatments may emerge in the next years. However, the real improvement of therapeutic perspectives for OS is strictly connected to the identification of pharmacogenomic biomarkers that may stratify patients in responders or non-responders and identify those individuals with higher susceptibility to treatment-associated toxicity. This review provides an overview of the pharmacogenomic biomarkers identified so far in OS, which appear to be promising candidates for a translation to clinical practice, after further investigation and/or prospective validation.

Advances in emerging drugs for osteosarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Osteosarcoma (OS), the most common primary malignant bone tumor, is currently treated with pre- and postoperative chemotherapy in association with the surgical removal of the tumor. Conventional treatments allow to cure about 60 - 65% of patients with primary tumors and only 20 - 25% of patients with recurrent disease. New treatment approaches and drugs are therefore highly warranted to improve prognosis.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the therapeutic approaches that are under development or clinical evaluation in OS. Information was obtained from different and continuously updated data bases, as well as from literature searches, in which particular relevance was given to reports and reviews on new targeted therapies under clinical investigation in high-grade OS.

EXPERT OPINION

OS is a heterogeneous tumor, with a great variability in treatment response between patients. It is therefore unlikely that a single therapeutic tool will be uniformly successful for all OS patients. This claims for the validation of new treatment approaches together with biologic/(pharmaco)genetic markers, which may select the most appropriate subgroup of patients for each treatment approach. Since some promising novel agents and treatment strategies are currently tested in Phase I/II/III clinical trials, we may hope that new therapies with superior efficacy and safety profiles will be identified in the next few years.

Proximal tumor location and fluid-fluid levels on MRI predict resistance to chemotherapy in stage IIB osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Primary tumor growth during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is believed to be a sign of resistance to chemotherapy (chemoresistance), and often is associated with poor histologic response, local recurrence, and poorer survival. Currently there are no proven indicators to predict poor response to chemotherapy at the time of diagnosis.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked (1) what clinicopathologic factors present at diagnosis predict primary tumor growth during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, (2) what factors at presentation predict survival, and (3) when the factors at presentation and the treatment-related factors are considered, what factors independently correlate with survival.

METHODS

We studied 567 patients with Stage IIB osteosarcomas. The factors assessed included age, sex, location, pattern on plain radiographs (radiodense, radiolucent, mixed), MRI findings, pathologic subtype, initial tumor volume determined by MRI, tumor volume change after chemotherapy, surgical margin, and histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy. Logistic modeling was used to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Independent risk factors associated with primary tumor growth after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were proximal tumor location (p < 0.01; relative risk [RR], 2.41; 95% CI, 1.5-3.86) and fluid-fluid level on initial MRI (p < 0.01; RR, 5.56; 95% CI, 3.48-8.87). Among factors at presentation, large initial tumor volume (p < 0.01; RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.22-2.04), proximal tumor site (p < 0.01; RR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.19-2.19), and presence of fluid-fluid level (p < 0.01; RR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.37-2.5) independently predicted reduced event-free survival. When we consider the factors at presentation and treatment-related factors, large initial tumor volume (p < 0.01; RR, 1.54), tumor growth after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.01; RR, 3.88), inadequate surgical margin (p < 0.01; RR, 2.42), and poor histologic response (p = 0.03; RR, 1.43) were independent poor prognostic factors of event-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal tumor location and the presence of the fluid-fluid level on initial MRI were predictors of tumor progression and poor survival in patients presenting with Stage IIB osteosarcomas. If confirmed in other studies, patients with these risk factors should be considered for trials of other treatment strategy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Growth factors, their receptor expression and markers for proliferation of endothelial and neoplastic cells in human osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumour of the bone. Although new therapies continue to be reported, osteosarcoma-related morbidity and mortality remain high. Modern medicine has greatly increased knowledge of the physiopathology of this neoplasm. Novel targets for drug development may be identified through an understanding of the normal molecular processes that are deeply modified in pathological conditions. The aim of the present study is to investigate, by immunohistochemistry, the localisation of different growth factors and of the proliferative marker Ki-67 in order to determine whether these factors are involved in the transformation of osteogenic cells and in the development of human osteosarcoma. We observed a general positivity for NGF - TrKA - NT3 - TrKC - VEGF in the cytoplasm of neoplastic cells and a strong expression for NT4 in the nuclear compartment. TGF-beta was strongly expressed in the extracellular matrix and vascular endothelium. BDNF and TrKB showed a strong immunolabeling in the extracellular matrix. Ki-67/MIB-1 was moderately expressed in the nucleus of neoplastic cells. We believe that these growth factors may be considered potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of osteosarcoma, although proof of this hypothesis requires further investigation.

Review of the molecular pathogenesis of osteosarcoma

Treating the osteosarcoma (OSA) remains a challenge. Current strategies focus on the primary tumor and have limited efficacy for metastatic OSA. A better understanding of the OSA pathogenesis may provide a rational basis for innovative treatment strategies especially for metastases. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the molecular mechanisms of OSA tumorigenesis, OSA cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and chemotherapy resistance, and how improved understanding might contribute to designing a better treatment target for OSA.

A prognostic evaluation of vascular endothelial growth factor in children and young adults with osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

The potential role of VEGF in osteosarcoma has been evaluated in several studies. The majority of them included heterogeneous and limited series of patients, giving conflicting results. The aim of presented study is to evaluate the prognostic role of VEGF-A in biopsy samples of clinically homogeneous group of osteosarcoma patients with at least 5 years of follow up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

VEGF-A was assessed immunohistochemically in the pre-treatment biopsy samples of 91 patients (mean age 14 years; range, 4-23 years) with primary, high-grade, non-metastatic osteosarcoma localized in extremities. The survival of each patient was assessed after at least 5-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

VEGF-A over 50% of positive tumor cells was observed in 39% of cases and was linked to patients age below 14-year old (P = 0.025) and tumor size more than 8 cm (P = 0.054). VEGF-A was associated with a significantly decreased both overall survival (P = 0.006) and progression-free survival (P = 0.011). In the Cox proportional hazard model it was confirmed that VEGF-A expression in the biopsy samples was an independent prognostic factor of unfavorable survival in osteosarcoma (HR 2.51; 95% CI: 1.12-5.66).

CONCLUSION

The expression of VEGF-A in the biopsy sample is the potential marker for predicting the course and outcome of osteosarcoma.

Emerging drugs for high-grade osteosarcoma

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumour in children and adolescents. This review focuses on the most promising therapeutic markers and drugs which may potentially be considered for innovative high-grade OS treatments.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The list of drugs and compounds reviewed has been generated by taking into account those which target markers of potential clinical interest for high-grade OS and have been included in Phase I, II or III clinical trials. The literature search covers the last 40 years, starting from the first OS chemotherapy reports of the early 1970s. Particular relevance was given to reports and reviews on new targeted therapies of possible clinical usefulness for high-grade OS.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review gives an updated overview of novel therapeutic approaches which have been or are going to be evaluated in Phase I/II/III clinical studies for high-grade OS.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

On the basis of the information that has emerged so far, it can be predicted that in the next 5 - 10 years, new agents to be included in innovative treatment strategies for selected subgroups of high-grade OS patients may become available.

Risk stratification based on the clinical factors at diagnosis is closely related to the survival of localized osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Survival of osteosarcoma patients has reached a plateau with the addition of chemotherapy and in part predicted based on histologic response. Risk-adapted therapy might be an alternative approach. We aimed to identify risk groups using clinical variables available at time of diagnosis in order to better predict outcomes and form the basis for risk-adapted therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 288 patients with high-grade osteosarcoma of their extremities. Clinicopathologic variables were analyzed to identify factors relevant to risk stratification.

RESULTS

A risk assessment system was developed using age, maximal tumor length (MTL) and tumor location. Index scores were based on the sum total of factor scores, for each of the following: Age (years); "1" for >or=40 or 12-14 (female) or 13-15 (male), "0" for other ages; MTL (cm); "2" for >or=8, "1" for 6-8, "0" for <or=6; Tumor location; "1" for humerus, "0" for elsewhere. Index score 0 or 1 was assigned as low-risk, 2 as intermediate-risk, and 3 or 4 as high-risk. Of the 288 patients, 98 (34.0%) were designated as low-risk, 128 (44.4%) as intermediate-risk and 62 (21.6%) as high-risk. Risk group was related to histologic response and survival. While 63.3% of low-risk patients were good responders, only 43.0% and 33.9% of intermediate- and high-risk patients were good responders. Ten-year event-free survival (EFS) was 81.6 +/- 3.9% for low-risk group, but 31.6 +/- 6.0% for high-risk group.

CONCLUSION

We defined three risk groups that could be used as basis of risk-adapted therapy for osteosarcoma.

The treatment of nonmetastatic high grade osteosarcoma of the extremity: review of the Italian Rizzoli experience. Impact on the future

The Bone Tumor Center of the "Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli" was established in 1955 with the aim of studying and treating the musculoskeletal tumors. Between 1959 and 2006, 1245 patients with high grade nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity were treated at our Institute. Most of them were enrolled in study protocols. In the "prechemotherapy era", the cure rate was 11%, with an amputation rate of 90%. Our first experience with adjuvant chemotherapy was in 1972. A total of 223 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, with a disease-free survival (DFS) ranging from 45% to 53%, according to the chemotherapy protocol used. With the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the resection rate increased and reached 94%, when high dose fosfamide was added to standard doses of methotrexate, cisplatin, and adriamycin. In the last few years, the results of treatment of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity have reached a plateau (64% five-year DFS), and strategies of dose intensification are not able to improve the prognosis. Not only new active drugs, but also different approaches to the disease, are needed. In this regard, we are now investigating tumor microenvironment-targeted agents and chemotherapy protocols based on prospective biological stratification of patients. Collaborative projects with international groups and institutions are crucial for this rare disease.