Clinical and Pathologic Features of Hispanic Endometrial Cancer Patients With Loss of Mismatch Repair Expression

OBJECTIVES

Approximately 3% to 5% of endometrial cancers (EC) are associated with Lynch syndrome (LS). The clinical characteristics and prevalence of LS have not been well studied in the US Hispanic population. Hispanics are the largest and fastest growing ethnic minority group in the United States. We sought to characterize the demographics, tumor characteristics, and prevalence of loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression in a large Hispanic population with EC.

METHODS

From January 1, 2005, to August 1, 2012, 83 women of Hispanic ethnicity diagnosed with EC 50 years and younger were identified. Clinical and pathologic data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Tumor studies included immunohistochemistry of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 and methylation of the MLH1 promoter.

RESULTS

Ninety-five percent of patients were overweight or obese. The mean body mass index was 40.1 kg/m, 75% had irregular menses, 36% had diabetes, 46% were nulliparous, and 95% had endometrioid histology. Thirteen patients (15.7%) had tumor MMR deficiency due to a presumed germline mutation (9 MSH6, 3 MSH2, and 1 MLH1). The pattern of MMR protein loss was consistent with the expected binding properties of the MMR heterodimer complexes. No significant difference was found in clinical or pathological variables between patients with and without MMR deficient tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of molecular findings consistent with LS was at least as high as other populations of varied geography, race, and ethnicity. We found no reliable factors to include body mass index, family history, synchronous tumors, or pathologic tumor features to serve as triage markers for which ECs should be screened for MMR protein loss. Our findings support a recommendation for universal screening of ECs utilizing 2-antibody testing with MLH1 promoter methylation testing as indicated up to 60 years or older. Our recommendations should be generalizable to other Hispanic populations in the Southern United States.

Development of an integrated support system for hereditary cancer and its impact on gynecologic services

OBJECTIVE

Patients with hereditary cancer need an integrated support system. A recently launched project was evaluated in terms of its efficacy in screening patients with hereditary cancer at the gynecologic service.

METHODS

The project team comprised gynecologists, surgeons, medical geneticists, and certified genetic counselors (CGCs) in our hospital. At the gynecologic service, a newly developed self-administered family history questionnaire (SAFHQ) was given to patients with ovarian, endometrial, or breast cancer as well as a history of multiple cancers. After an interview, a CGC constructed a pedigree and evaluated the risk for hereditary cancer. Patients at risk were recommended by a gynecologist to receive further genetic counseling at the Department of Genetics according to the modified Bethesda criteria, Amsterdam II criteria, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines 2012 for breast-ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). The numbers of newly screened patients were compared before and after the project launch.

RESULTS

The SAFHQ was administered to 131 patients and 106 (81 %) pedigrees were constructed between August 2012 and July 2013. The number of newly screened patients according to the Bethesda criteria was 4 and 8 at 10 years before and 1 year after the project launch, respectively. Two and 31 patients met the NCCN criteria for HBOC excluding ovarian cancer alone, respectively, at these 2 time points. Of 54 patients who were recommended to undergo further counseling, 10 (19 %) visited the Department of Genetics.

CONCLUSION

After the launch of an integrated support system, the number of patients with hereditary cancers who were screened increased. The gynecologic service played a pivotal role in patient and family care.

Fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer: options, outcomes and pitfalls

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, with over 40,000 cases diagnosed each year. While a majority of cases are diagnosed in post-menopausal women, up to 14% of cases will be in pre-menopausal women, including 4% diagnosed in women less than 40 years of age. While hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with assessment of the retroperitoneal lymph nodes is standard initial treatment for endometrial cancer, younger women may desire fertility sparing options. The decision to proceed with conservative management in this younger patient population is associated with multiple complexities, including the inherent oncologic risks of an inadequately staged and treated endometrial cancer, the risk of a synchronous or meta-synchronous cancer, the increased risk of an inherited genetic predisposition to malignancy and the lack of uniformity in the medical management and surveillance. In this review we will discuss the conservative management of endometrial cancer, specifically the role of progestin hormonal therapy, including the risks associated with non-standard care, appropriate candidate selection and work up, expected outcomes, various progestin agents and recommended follow-up.

Identification of patients at-risk for Lynch syndrome in a hospital-based colorectal surgery clinic

AIM: To determine the prevalence of a family history suggestive of Lynch syndrome (LS) among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) followed in a coloproctology outpatient clinic in Southern Brazil.

METHODS: A consecutive sample of patients with CRC were interviewed regarding personal and family histories of cancer. Clinical data and pathology features of the tumor were obtained from chart review.

RESULTS: Of the 212 CRC patients recruited, 61 (29%) reported a family history of CRC, 45 (21.2%) were diagnosed under age 50 years and 11 (5.2%) had more than one primary CRC. Family histories consistent with Amsterdam and revised Bethesda criteria for LS were identified in 22 (10.4%) and 100 (47.2%) patients, respectively. Twenty percent of the colorectal tumors had features of the high microsatellite instability phenotype, which was associated with younger age at CRC diagnosis and with Bethesda criteria (P < 0.001). Only 5.3% of the patients above age 50 years had been previously submitted for CRC screening and only 4% of patients with suspected LS were referred for genetic risk assessment.

CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with CRC were at high risk for LS. Education and training of health care professionals are essential to ensure proper management.

A review of the challenges faced in the conservative treatment of young women with endometrial carcinoma and risk of ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The standard management for women diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma (EC) is hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy. However, more conservative treatment approaches, including uterine and ovarian preservation, may be used for women who have a strong desire to maintain fertility in spite of potential oncologic risks.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature regarding fertility-preserving treatment for EC. We also conducted medical chart reviews for two young patients diagnosed with EC whose treatment deviated from the standard approach in order to preserve fertility. These patients were subsequently diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Our review summarizes the literature regarding the clinical and emotional implications of fertility preservation in young women.

CASES

Two young nulliparous women (29 and 23 years, respectively) with grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma were initially treated with conservative fertility-sparing endocrine therapy. Upon failure of endocrine treatment both women underwent hysterectomy and staging with ovarian preservation. During surveillance, both women were subsequently diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma and underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and comprehensive staging.

CONCLUSION

The management of young women with endometrial cancer can be complex and challenging. Patients and physicians are confronted with the dilemma of following standard surgical guidelines versus the desire to maintain fertility and avoid surgical menopause. Careful oncologic, psychotherapeutic, genetic and reproductive counseling is advised before offering a non-standard treatment strategy to young endometrial cancer patients.