Predicting the risk of pancreatic cancer: on CDKN2A mutations in the melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndrome in Italy

Understanding the Genetic Landscape of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Support Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Review

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. While population-wide screening recommendations for PDAC in asymptomatic individuals are not achievable due to its relatively low incidence, pancreatic cancer surveillance programs are recommended for patients with germline causative variants in PDAC susceptibility genes or a strong family history. In this study, we sought to determine the prevalence and significance of germline alterations in major genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, TP53) involved in PDAC susceptibility. We performed a systematic review of PubMed publications reporting germline variants identified in these genes in PDAC patients. Overall, the retrieved articles included 1493 PDAC patients. A high proportion of these patients (n = 1225/1493, 82%) were found to harbor alterations in genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2) involved in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Specifically, the remaining PDAC patients were reported to carry alterations in genes playing a role in other cancer pathways (CDKN2A, STK11, TP53; n = 181/1493, 12.1%) or in the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2; n = 87/1493, 5.8%). Our findings highlight the importance of germline genetic characterization in PDAC patients for better personalized targeted therapies, clinical management, and surveillance.

[Familial pancreatic cancer syndrome]

In contrast to many other malignant entities the risk factors for pancreatic cancer are mostly unknown. Hereditary factors are causative in about 3-6% of all pancreatic cancers. In addition to hereditary tumor disposition syndromes and hereditary pancreatitis, the familial pancreatic cancer syndrome accounts for about 75% of all hereditary pancreatic cancers. A familial pancreatic cancer syndrome is present when at least two first-degree relatives in a family have histologically proven pancreatic cancer and there are no criteria for another hereditary syndrome. An underlying uniform monogenetic gene defect in familial pancreatic cancer syndrome is currently unknown and a germline mutation in the BRCA2 gene is so far the most frequently identified genetic alteration. Patients at risk for familial pancreatic cancer should be offered participation in registry studies with associated early detection programs (e.g., the FaPaCa registry). These enable the detection of high-grade neoplasms and pancreatic cancer in the early stages, which appears to reduce mortality; however, the detected pancreatic lesions are often incorrectly diagnostically classified, and patients undergo complex pancreatic resection despite benign findings. Finally, studies have so far not been able to clearly clarify whether patients at risk benefit from an early detection program. According to current data, prophylactic operations are not indicated for familial pancreatic cancer syndrome and should only be performed if there is evidence of a suspicious finding that requires resection.

Melanoma-specific survival before and after inclusion in a familial melanoma dermatologic surveillance program in CDKN2A mutation carriers and non-carriers

BACKGROUND

Inherited mutations in the CDKN2A gene are among the strongest known risk factors for cutaneous melanoma. Further, previous studies have reported inferior melanoma-specific survival in CDKN2A mutation carriers.

OBJECTIVES

Here, the melanoma-specific survival was studied, depending on CDKN2A carrier status and if the melanomas had been diagnosed before or after families were included in a surveillance program.

METHODS

Melanoma-prone families participating in this study were identified through a nationwide preventive program starting in 1987. Information on melanoma tumours and deaths was obtained through the Swedish Cancer Registry and Cause of Death Registry. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess melanoma-specific survival in four defined cohorts, CDKN2A mutation (MUT) carriers with first invasive melanoma before or after inclusion [MUT-pre (n = 53) and MUT-post (n = 43)] and likewise in CDKN2A wild type (WT) cases [WT-pre (n = 255) and WT-post (n = 122)].

RESULTS

The MUT-pre and MUT-post cases were diagnosed with their first invasive melanoma at a significantly younger ages (38 and 42 years, respectively) than the WT-pre and WT-post cases (48 and 57 years, respectively). The melanomas in the MUT-pre had significantly higher T stage compared with MUT-post (p = 0.006), whereas no such difference was seen comparing WT-pre with WT-post (p = 0.849). MUT-pre had compared with WT-pre, significantly worse melanoma-specific survival, unadjusted (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.33-4.08, p = 0.003) adjusted (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.46-5.00, p = 0.001). However, the MUT-post cases had compared with the WT-post cases, no significant survival differences.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to address the impact on survival from introducing a dermatologic surveillance program to familial melanoma cases with or without CDKN2A mutations. The CDKN2A-mut carriers appeared to have a clear benefit with less advanced melanomas diagnosed and better melanoma-specific survival after inclusion. Among the CDKN2A-wt cases, the effect of the inclusion on the studied outcomes was less evident.

Hereditary pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest malignancies. Therefore, there is an urgent need to detect pancreatic cancer in an earlier stage to improve outcomes. A variety of hereditary cancer syndromes have been associated with an increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer, and these individuals may benefit from surveillance programs. Surveillance programs have shown potential to improve outcomes, but have important risks such as overtreatment. In this review we will discuss the definitions and epidemiology of hereditary pancreatic cancer, recommendations for genetic testing and participation in surveillance. Important aspects are differences in surveillance strategies, target lesions, and potential benefits and harms of surveillance. Lastly we will highlight future directions for research and improvement of care for individuals at high-risk of pancreatic cancer.

CDKN2A germline mutations are not associated with poor survival in an Italian cohort of melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A gene (CDKN2A) germline mutations have recently been associated with poor survival in patients with melanoma. Despite the high mutation rate in our cohort (up to 10% in patients with apparently sporadic melanoma), information on the impact of CDKN2A on survival in this cohort is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether poor survival associated with CDKN2A germline mutations was confirmed in a high mutation-prevalence cohort of Italian patients with melanoma undergoing a mutation-based follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 1239 patients with cutaneous melanoma were tested for CDKN2A mutational status and then assigned to a follow-up scheme according not only to family history but also to CDKN2A mutational status, as follow-up intervals were more frequent for CDKN2A germline mutation-positive (MUT+) patients. From this cohort, we selected 106 MUT+ patients (with familial melanoma or apparently sporadic melanoma) and 199 CDKN2A germline mutation-negative (MUT-) patients with sporadic melanoma who were matched by age and sex and had a similar tumor stage distribution.

RESULTS

We found no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.52; P = .592,) or melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.95; P = .718,) between MUT+ and MUT- patients. MUT+ patients were more likely to develop multiple melanomas and to undergo surgical excision of dysplastic nevi than were MUT- patients.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

CDKN2A mutations were not associated with survival in our cohort.

CDKN2A germline alterations in melanoma patients with personal or familial history of pancreatic cancer

CDKN2A germline mutations increase the risk of melanoma development and are present in 20 and 10% of familial and multiple melanoma cases, respectively. Pancreatic cancer has been associated with CDKN2A in some populations and, accordingly, its presence in first-degree or second-degree relatives of a melanoma patient is considered as a criterion for genetic testing. In this study, we show that in an area with low melanoma incidence, CDKN2A germline mutations in patients with melanoma and personal or family history of pancreatic cancer are mainly present in the setting of familial or multiple melanoma cases. In addition, a relatively young age (≤52 years) at pancreatic diagnosis is an additional single criterion that might also be considered.

The identification of patient-specific mutations reveals dual pathway activation in most patients with melanoma and activated receptor tyrosine kinases in BRAF/NRAS wild-type melanomas

BACKGROUND

Increasing knowledge of cancer genomes has triggered the development of specific targeted inhibitors, thus providing a valuable therapeutic pool.

METHODS

In this report, the authors analyze the presence of targetable alterations in 136 tumor samples from 92 patients with melanoma using a comprehensive approach based on targeted DNA sequencing and supported by RNA and protein analysis. Three topics of high clinical relevance are addressed: the identification of rare, activating alterations; the detection of patient-specific, co-occurring single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variations (CNVs) in parallel pathways; and the presence of cancer-relevant germline mutations.

RESULTS

The analysis of patient-matched blood and tumor samples was done with a custom-designed gene panel that was enriched for genes from clinically targetable pathways. To detect alterations with high therapeutic relevance for patients with unknown driver mutations, genes that are untypical for melanoma also were included. Among all patients, CNVs were identified in one-third of samples and contained amplifications of druggable kinases, such as CDK4, ERBB2, and KIT. Considering SNVs and CNVs, 60% of patients with metastases exhibited co-occurring activations of at least 2 pathways, thus providing a rationale for individualized combination therapies. Unexpectedly, 9% of patients carry potentially protumorigenic germline mutations frequently affecting receptor tyrosine kinases. Remarkably two-thirds of BRAF/NRAS wild-type melanomas harbor activating mutations or CNVs in receptor tyrosine kinases.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the integrated analysis of SNVs, CNVs, and germline mutations reveals new druggable targets for combination tumor therapy.

KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, BRCA1, and BRCA2 Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a disease that has a very high fatality rate and one of the highest mortality ratios among all major cancers, remaining the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in developed countries. The major treatment of pancreatic cancer is surgery; however, only 15–20% of patients are candidates for it at the diagnosis of disease. On the other hand, survival in patients, who undergo surgery, is less than 30%. In most cancers, genome stability is disturbed and pancreatic cancer is not the exception. Approximately 97% of pancreatic cancers have gene derangements, defined by point mutations, amplifications, deletions, translocations, and inversions. This review describes the most frequent genetic alterations found in pancreatic cancer.

The CDKN2A/p16(INK) (4a) 5'UTR sequence and translational regulation: impact of novel variants predisposing to melanoma

Many variants of uncertain functional significance in cancer susceptibility genes lie in regulatory regions, and clarifying their association with disease risk poses significant challenges. We studied 17 germline variants (nine of which were novel) in the CDKN2A 5'UTR with independent approaches, which included mono and bicistronic reporter assays, Western blot of endogenous protein, and allelic representation after polysomal profiling to investigate their impact on CDKN2A mRNA translation regulation. Two of the novel variants (c.-27del23, c.-93-91delAGG) were classified as causal mutations (score ≥3), along with the c.-21C>T, c.-34G>T, and c.-56G>T, which had already been studied by a subset of assays. The novel c.-42T>A as well as the previously described c.-67G>C were classified as potential mutations (score 1 or 2). The remaining variants (c.-14C>T, c.-20A>G, c.-25C>T+c.-180G>A, c.-30G>A, c.-40C>T, c.-45G>A, c.-59C>G, c.-87T>A, c.-252A>T) were classified as neutral (score 0). In conclusion, we found evidence that nearly half of the variants found in this region had a negative impact on CDKN2A mRNA translation, supporting the hypothesis that 5'UTR can act as a cellular Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES) to modulate p16(INK) (4a) translation.

Multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) and criteria for genetic assessment: MultiMEL, a multicenter study of the Italian Melanoma Intergroup

BACKGROUND

Multiple primary melanoma (MPM), in concert with a positive family history, is a predictor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) germline mutations. A rule regarding the presence of either 2 or 3 or more cancer events (melanoma and pancreatic cancer) in low or high melanoma incidence populations, respectively, has been established to select patients for genetic referral.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the CDKN2A/CDK4/microphthalmia-associated transcription factor mutation rate among Italian patients with MPM to appropriately direct genetic counseling regardless of family history.

METHODS

In all, 587 patients with MPM and an equal number with single primary melanomas and control subjects were consecutively enrolled at the participating centers and tested for CDKN2A, CDK4, and microphthalmia-associated transcription factor.

RESULTS

CDKN2A germline mutations were found in 19% of patients with MPM versus 4.4% of patients with single primary melanoma. In familial MPM cases the mutation rate varied from 36.6% to 58.8%, whereas in sporadic MPM cases it varied from 8.2% to 17.6% in patients with 2 and 3 or more melanomas, respectively. The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor E318K mutation accounted for 3% of MPM cases altogether.

LIMITATIONS

The study was hospital based, not population based. Rare novel susceptibility genes were not tested.

CONCLUSION

Italian patients who developed 2 melanomas, even in situ, should be referred for genetic counseling even in the absence of family history.

Epidemiological and genetic factors underlying melanoma development in Italy

Among human cancers, melanoma remains one of the malignancies with an ever-growing incidence in white populations. Recent advances in biological and immunological therapeutic approaches as well as increased efforts for secondary prevention are contributing to improve the survival rates. It is likely that a significant fall in mortality rates for melanoma will be achieved by further increase of the early detection through a more accurate selection of the higher-risk individuals (i.e., carriers of predisposing genetic alterations). A similar scenario occurs in Italy. In the present review, we have considered data on incidence, survival and mortality rates of melanoma in Italian population, including evaluation of the main risk factors and genetic mutations underlying disease susceptibility.

Negative methylation status of Vimentin predicts improved prognosis in pancreatic carcinoma

AIM: To determine the existence of a potential relationship between the methylation state of the Vimentin gene and its prognostic value in pancreatic cancer.

METHODS: Sixty-four primary tumor specimens and normal tissues were collected consecutively from pancreatic cancer patients during surgery at Hangzhou First People’s Hospital and Affiliated Hospital of the Logistics University of the Chinese People’s Armed Police Force. DNA was extracted from the samples and subsequently quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction was used to detect the Vimentin methylation status of the samples. All of the patients were followed up to December 2012. χ² test, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression statistical models were used.

RESULTS: Out of 64 pancreatic cancer tissues, 21 were marked as Vimentin methylation-positive, and 43 were marked as Vimentin methylation-negative. The location of pancreatic carcinoma was related to the Vimentin methylation state. The pathological T staging (P < 0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.003) and the Vimentin methylation state (P = 0.037) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION: In our study, Vimentin methylation status can predict the prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients. However, additional experiments and clinical trials are needed to accurately validate this observation.

CDKN2A unclassified variants in familial malignant melanoma: combining functional and computational approaches for their assessment

CDKN2A codes for two oncosuppressors by alternative splicing of two first exons: p16INK4a and p14ARF. Germline mutations are found in about 40% of melanoma-prone families, and most of them are missense mutations mainly affecting p16INK4a. A growing number of p16INK4a variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are being identified but, unless their pathogenic role can be demonstrated, they cannot be used for identification of carriers at risk. Predicting the effect of these VUS by either a "standard" in silico approach, or functional tests alone, is rather difficult. Here, we report a protocol for the assessment of any p16INK4a VUS, which combines experimental and computational tools in an integrated approach. We analyzed p16INK4a VUS from melanoma patients as well as variants derived through permutation of conserved p16INK4a amino acids. Variants were expressed in a p16INK4a-null cell line (U2-OS) and tested for their ability to block proliferation. In parallel, these VUS underwent in silico prediction analysis and molecular dynamics simulations. Evaluation of in silico and functional data disclosed a high agreement for 15/16 missense mutations, suggesting that this approach could represent a pilot study for the definition of a protocol applicable to VUS in general, involved in other diseases, as well.

Contribution of germline mutations in the BRCA and PALB2 genes to pancreatic cancer in Italy

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) is the third most common cancer associated with BRCA mutations. Most notice has been given to BRCA2, while the association between BRCA1 and PC is less widely reported. Recently, PALB2 has been implicated in both PC and breast cancer (BC) susceptibility. We selected 29 Italian PC patients from a case-control study of PC according to their personal and family history of both PC and breast/ovarian cancer (BC/OC) and tested them for presence of germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2. We identified no germline mutations or deletions in PALB2, but detected 7 BRCA mutations (4 in BRCA1 and 3 in BRCA2). These findings suggest that PALB2 does not play a major role in PC susceptibility in our population. As we found an almost equal frequency of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, germline alterations in either of these genes may explain a subset of Italian families presenting both PC and BC/OC. Moreover, as we began the observation of these families from probands who are affected by PC, we provide here a direct assessment of the role of PALB2 and BRCA mutations in PC susceptibility.

Prevalence of CDKN2A mutations in pancreatic cancer patients: implications for genetic counseling

Germline mutations in CDKN2A have been reported in pancreatic cancer families, but genetic counseling for pancreatic cancer risk has been limited by lack of information on CDKN2A mutation carriers outside of selected pancreatic or melanoma kindreds. Lymphocyte DNA from consecutive, unselected white non-Hispanic patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma was used to sequence CDKN2A. Frequencies of mutations that alter the coding of p16INK4 or p14ARF were quantified overall and in subgroups. Penetrance and likelihood of carrying mutations by family history were estimated. Among 1537 cases, 9 (0.6%) carried germline mutations in CDKN2A, including three previously unreported mutations. CDKN2A mutation carriers were more likely to have a family history of pancreatic cancer (P=0.003) or melanoma (P=0.03), and a personal history of melanoma (P=0.01). Among cases who reported having a first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer or melanoma, the carrier proportions were 3.3 and 5.3%, respectively. Penetrance for mutation carriers by age 80 was calculated to be 58% for pancreatic cancer (95% confidence interval (CI) 8-86%), and 39% for melanoma (95% CI 0-80). Among cases who ever smoked cigarettes, the risk for pancreatic cancer was higher for carriers compared with non-carriers (HR 25.8, P=2.1 × 10⁻¹³), but among nonsmokers, this comparison did not reach statistical significance. Germline mutations in CDKN2A among unselected pancreatic cancer patients are uncommon, although notably penetrant, especially among smokers. Carriers of germline mutations of CDKN2A should be counseled to avoid tobacco use to decrease risk of pancreatic cancer in addition to taking measures to decrease melanoma risk.

Clinical and genetic analysis of 18 pancreatic carcinoma/melanoma-prone families

Families with both melanoma and pancreatic cancer are extremely rare and some are affected with the autosomal dominant inherited familial atypical multiple mole melanoma-pancreatic cancer (FAMMM-PC) syndrome. The phenotypic and genotypic expressions of such pancreatic cancer-melanoma prone families are not well defined. The National Case Collection of Familial Pancreatic Cancer of the Deutsche Krebshilfe includes 110 pancreatic cancer families, 18 of which (16%) show an association of pancreatic cancer and melanoma. These 18 families were analysed regarding their phenotype and the prevalence of germline mutations in the candidate genes CDKN2A, BRCA2, CHEK2, NOD2, ARL11 and Palladin (PALLD). There were two types of families: five families with the FAMMM-PC phenotype and 13 PC/melanoma families without the multiple mole phenotypes (PCMS). The prevalences of PC and melanoma in the two types of families were similar. The prevalence of other tumour types, especially breast carcinoma, was higher (11%) in PCMS- than in FAMMM-PC families (2.4%, p = 0.02). CDKN2A mutations were identified in 2 of 18 (11%) PCMS families. A cosegregating BRCA2 mutation was detected in one PCMS family without breast cancer. None of the reported germline mutations in the NOD2, Palladin, ARL11 or CHEK2 genes were detected in either type of family. In conclusion, families with an accumulation of PC and melanoma show a large variety of phenotypic expression, which is not always consistent with the FAMMM-PC phenotype. More PC/melanoma-prone families need to be analysed to clarify whether such families represent variations of the FAMMM-PC syndrome or two distinct hereditary cancer syndromes.

Selection criteria for genetic assessment of patients with familial melanoma

Approximately 5% to 10% of melanoma may be hereditary in nature, and about 2% of melanoma can be specifically attributed to pathogenic germline mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A). To appropriately identify the small proportion of patients who benefit most from referral to a genetics specialist for consideration of genetic testing for CDKN2A, we have reviewed available published studies of CDKN2A mutation analysis in cohorts with invasive, cutaneous melanoma and found variability in the rate of CDKN2A mutations based on geography, ethnicity, and the type of study and eligibility criteria used. Except in regions of high melanoma incidence, such as Australia, we found higher rates of CDKN2A positivity in individuals with 3 or more primary invasive melanomas and/or families with at least one invasive melanoma and two or more other diagnoses of invasive melanoma and/or pancreatic cancer among first- or second-degree relatives on the same side of the family. The work summarized in this review should help identify individuals who are appropriate candidates for referral for genetic consultation and possible testing.