Combined time-restricted feeding and cisplatin enhance the anti-tumor effects in cisplatin-resistant and -sensitive lung cancer cells

Combination therapy as an important treatment option for lung cancer has been attracting attention due to the primary and acquired resistance of chemotherapeutic drugs in the clinical application. In the present study, as a new therapy strategy, concomitant treatment with time-restricted feeding (TRF) plus cisplatin (DDP) on lung cancer growth was investigated in DDP-resistant and DDP-sensitive lung cancer cells. We first found that TRF significantly enhanced the drug susceptibility of DDP in DDP-resistant A549 (A549/DDP) cell line, illustrated by reversing the inhibitory concentration 50 (IC₅₀) values of A549/DDP cells to normal level of parental A549 cells. We also found that TRF markedly enhanced DDP inhibition on cell proliferation, migration, as well as promoted apoptosis compared to the DDP alone group in A549, H460 and A549/DDP cells lines. We further revealed that the synergistic anti-tumor effect of combined DDP and TRF was greater than that of combined DDP and simulated fasting condition (STS), a known anti-tumor cellular medium. Moreover, mRNA sequence analysis from A549/DDP cell line demonstrated the synergistic anti-tumor effect involved in upregulated pathways in p53 signaling pathway and apoptosis. Notably, compared with the DDP alone group, combination of TRF and DDP robustly upregulated the P53 protein expression without mRNA level change by regulating its stability via promoting protein synthesis and inhibiting degradation, revealed by cycloheximide and MG132 experiments. Collectively, our results suggested that TRF in combination with cisplatin might be an additional novel therapeutic strategy for patients with lung cancer.

Prognostic value of the veterans affairs frailty index in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Older patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a heterogeneous population with varying degrees of frailty. An electronic frailty index such as the Veterans Affairs Frailty Index (VA-FI) can potentially help identify vulnerable patients at high risk of poor outcomes.

METHODS

NSCLC patients ≥65 years old and diagnosed in 2002-2017 were identified using the VA Central Cancer Registry. The VA-FI was calculated using administrative codes from VA electronic health records data linked with Medicare and Medicaid data. We assessed associations between the VA-FI and times to mortality, hospitalization, and emergency room (ER) visit following diagnosis by Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable stratified Cox models. We also evaluated the change in discrimination and calibration of reference prognostic models after adding VA-FI.

RESULTS

We identified a cohort of 42,204 older NSCLC VA patients, in which 55.5% were classified as frail (VA-FI >0.2). After adjustment, there was a strong association between VA-FI and the risk of mortality (HR = 1.23 for an increase of four deficits or, equivalently, an increase of 0.129 on VA-FI, p < 0.001), hospitalization (HR = 1.16 for four deficits, p < 0.001), and ER visit (HR = 1.18 for four deficits, p < 0.001). Adding VA-FI to baseline prognostic models led to statistically significant improvements in time-dependent area under curves and did not have a strong impact on calibration.

CONCLUSION

Older NSCLC patients with higher VA-FI have significantly elevated risks of mortality, hospitalizations, and ER visits following diagnosis. An electronic frailty index can serve as an accessible tool to identify patients with vulnerabilities to inform clinical care and research.

Gemcitabine and Carboplatin Treatment in Advanced NSCLC: A Retrospective Evaluation Including Elderly Patients

Background

Carboplatin-containing regimens are sometimes preferred for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

Eighty-three patients with stage III-IV non-small cell lung cancer received 3 to 4 cycles of carboplatin AUC 5 on day 2 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days.

Results

The overall response rate was 43.4%. Results obtained from elderly and non-elderly groups were compared using the logrank method. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11 and 7 months, respectively (12 and 7 months, non-elderly group; 6.5 and 5 months, elderly group, P = 0.28 and 0.25 respectively). Grade 3–4 toxicity included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea. Incidences of grade 3–4 toxicity were similar for elderly and non-elderly patients.

Conclusions

Data confirm that carboplatin-gemcitabine is an active and well-tolerated regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer and could be investigated in elderly patients.

Anti-idiotype antibodies in cancer treatment: the pharmaceutical industry perspective

Active immunotherapy is an interesting field from the industry's perspective and in the last years, regulatory agencies and the medical community have showed renewed expectations and interest in cancer vaccines. The development of new immune therapies offers many challenges, and this is reflected in the small number of phase III trials showing clear benefits. Traditional concepts applied in clinical trials for the development of chemotherapeutic agents may be inadequate for immunotherapies and a new paradigm is emerging. It is possible that organized efforts and funding will accelerate the development of therapeutically effective cancer vaccines. This article reviews the attributes of cancer vaccines which make them attractive from the industry's perspective, and focuses especially in the characteristics of Racotumomab, an anti-idiotype antibody vaccine.

Carboplatin and paclitaxel with vs without bevacizumab in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

CONTEXT

A previous randomized trial demonstrated that adding bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel improved survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, longer survival was not observed in the subgroup of patients aged 65 years or older.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether adding bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in older patients with NSCLC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort study of 4168 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older with stage IIIB or stage IV non-squamous cell NSCLC diagnosed in 2002-2007 in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) region. Patients were categorized into 3 cohorts based on diagnosis year and type of initial chemotherapy administered within 4 months of diagnosis: (1) diagnosis in 2006-2007 and bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel therapy; (2) diagnosis in 2006-2007 and carboplatin-paclitaxel therapy; or (3) diagnosis in 2002-2005 and carboplatin-paclitaxel therapy. The associations between carboplatin-paclitaxel with vs without bevacizumab and overall survival were compared using Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score analyses including information about patient characteristics recorded in SEER-Medicare.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Overall survival measured from the first date of chemotherapy treatment until death or the censoring date of December 31, 2009.

RESULTS

The median survival estimates were 9.7 (interquartile range [IQR], 4.4-18.6) months for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel, 8.9 (IQR, 3.5-19.3) months for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2006-2007, and 8.0 (IQR, 3.7-17.2) months for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2002-2005. One-year survival probabilities were 39.6% (95% CI, 34.6%-45.4%) for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel vs 40.1% (95% CI, 37.4%-43.0%) for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2006-2007 and 35.6% (95% CI, 33.8%-37.5%) for carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2002-2005. Neither multivariable nor propensity score-adjusted Cox models demonstrated a survival advantage for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel cohorts. In propensity score-stratified models, the hazard ratio for overall survival for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2006-2007 was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.89-1.16; P = .85) and compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel in 2002-2005 was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.83-1.06; P = .28). The propensity score-weighted model and propensity score-matching model similarly failed to demonstrate a statistically significant superiority for bevacizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses for key variables did not change these findings.

CONCLUSION

Adding bevacizumab to carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy was not associated with better survival among Medicare patients with advanced NSCLC.

Charlson Comorbidity Index is an independent prognostic factor among elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

The clinical outcome for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has improved. However, the management of elderly patients with cancer is frequently complicated by their coexisting disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between comorbid medical status and clinical outcome among elderly patients with DLBCL.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients over 65 years old with newly diagnosed DLBCL from 2001 to 2008 in our institution. To assess their comorbid medical status, we calculated Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of each patient without considering primary disease and then divided them into low CCI (0 or 1) or high CCI group (2 or more).

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients from age of 66-90 years (median 73 years) were analyzed. Seventy-two patients (90%) were treated with cyclophosphamide-, doxorubicin-, vincristine-, and prednisone (CHOP)-based chemotherapy, and 14 patients (18%) were assigned to high CCI. The overall survival (OS) rate at 3 years for all patients was 70%, with significant difference between good and poor risk patients in revised International Prognostic Index (IPI) (90 vs. 45%, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed high CCI was associated with worse OS, while independent of other prognostic factors consisting IPI (hazard ratio 4.44, 95% confidence interval [1.63-11.3], P = 0.0045). In addition, high CCI group was significantly inferior to low CCI group for overall response rate (93 vs. 64% P = 0.0158) and 3-year OS (85 vs. 55% P = 0.0026), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among elderly DLBCL, high CCI was independently associated with worse outcome. Novel discrete strategies for these deteriorated patients are therefore warranted.

Treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly

More than 40% of cases of all lung cancers are diagnosed in patients over the age of 70 years. Elderly patients have more comorbidities and tend to be less tolerant to toxic medical treatments than their younger counterparts. Thus, clinical data obtained in a younger population cannot be automatically extrapolated to the great majority of nonselected elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The bulk of prospective clinical data regarding chemotherapy and molecularly targeted therapy for elderly NSCLC patients come from studies in advanced disease. In elderly advanced NSCLC patients, single-agent chemotherapy with third-generation agents (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, taxanes) is to be considered the routine standard of care for unselected patients, based on phase II and III trials specifically designed for this special population. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy with cisplatin at attenuated doses has been demonstrated to be an active and feasible option in phase II trials. Among targeted therapies, the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, erlotinib and gefitinib, have relevant phase II prospective data showing activity and good tolerability as first-line treatment in this population. Concerning the antivascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab, combined with chemotherapy, particular care must be taken for elderly patients because of the higher incidence of cardiovascular comorbidities. The lack of data on octogenarians suggest that clinicians should exercise caution when applying the existing data on chemotherapy and targeted therapies for patients aged 70-79 years to those aged >80 years. Further specifically designed clinical trials are needed to optimize medical treatment of NSCLC in elderly patients.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women and approximately 219,440 new cases of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were estimated to occur in the USA in 2009, which caused 159,390 NSCLC-related deaths. More than 50% of cases of advanced NSCLC are diagnosed in patients older than age 65, and recent Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEERs) data suggest that the median age at diagnosis is 70 years. Until recently, the disease has been undertreated in this patient population, with a perception among many clinicians that elderly patients do not tolerate chemotherapy or radiotherapy. So, single agent chemotherapy is the recommended approach by the ASCO and International Expert Panels in unselected patients. The introduction of novel targeted therapies, such as Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) which improved survival versus placebo in patients who had previously failed on chemotherapy, gives clinicians new, effective, and better tolerated options to consider when treating NSCLC in elderly patients. This paper describes the advances of EGFR TKIs for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab for unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for more than 85% of all cases of lung cancer. The 5-year survival of patients presenting with advanced stage NSCLC is less than 15%, indicating that additional treatment options are needed. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized version of the murine anti-human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody with a high binding specificity for VEGF.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on the basis of evidence-based methodology.

METHODS

The electronic database PubMed was searched to identify randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of bevacizumab for the treatment of unresectable NSCLC. Other databases such as the Cochrane Library Trials Register, the WHO Trial Registration, the National Cancer Institute, ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the Southwest Oncology Group, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, the European Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology were also searched. The meta-analysis was performed using Reviewer Manager Version 5.0 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. Outcome measures were overall survival rates, progression-free survival, tumour response rate, incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs) and treatment-related death.

RESULTS

Four eligible studies that included 2101 patients were found; in these studies, bevacizumab was administered to 1237 patients. Neither high-dose (15 mg/kg) nor low-dose (7.5 mg/kg) bevacizumab increased 1-year overall survival rates compared with patients not treated with bevacizumab. However, high-dose bevacizumab, rather than low-dose, increased 2-year overall survival rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04, 1.49) and tumour response rate (RR = 1.69; 95% CI 1.21, 2.35) compared with patients not treated with bevacizumab. Progression-free survival was also significantly improved in both the low- (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76; 95% CI 0.64, 0.90) and high-dose groups (HR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.65, 0.81). There was a clear and significant increase in the rate of treatment-related death in the high-dose group (RR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.19, 3.59) compared with patients not treated with bevacizumab. No significant differences were noted in the rate of treatment-related death in the low-dose group or in the incidences of SAE in the low- or high-dose groups compared with patients not treated with bevacizumab. Neutropenia was easily induced in both the low- and high-dose bevacizumab groups. Patients who received high-dose bevacizumab tended to experience hypertension, neutropenia, haemoptysis, rash and headache more frequently than patients not treated with bevacizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose bevacizumab may significantly improve progression-free survival in patients with unresectable NSCLC, whereas high-dose bevacizumab may increase 2-year overall survival rates, prolong progression-free survival and improve tumour response rate but at the cost of higher treatment-related death. Larger well designed RCTs should be carried out in the future to clarify the role of bevacizumab in the treatment of NSCLC.

EORTC Elderly Task Force and Lung Cancer Group and International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) experts' opinion for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in an elderly population

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a common health issue in the elderly population. Nevertheless, the paucity of large, well-conducted prospective trials makes it difficult to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for these patients. The present paper reviews the currently available evidence regarding treatment of all stages of NSCLC in elderly patients. Surgery remains the standard for early-stage disease, though pneumonectomy is associated with higher incidence of postoperative mortality in elderly patients. Given the lack of demonstrated benefit for the use of adjuvant radiotherapy, it is also not recommended in elderly patients. Elderly patients seem to derive the same benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy as younger patients do, with no significant increase in toxicity. For locally advanced NSCLC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be offered to selected elderly patients as there is a higher risk for toxicity reported in the elderly population. Third-generation single-agent treatment is considered the standard of care for patients with advanced/metastatic disease. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy needs to be evaluated in prospective trials. Unfortunately, with the exception of advanced/metastatic NSCLC, prospective elderly-specific NSCLC trials are lacking and the majority of recommendations made are based on retrospective data, which might suffer from selection bias. Prospective elderly-specific trials are needed.

Treatment of performance status 2 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: what we know and what we don’t know

Performance status (PS)2 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer have been historically excluded from clinical trials, and scant data are available to guide clinical practice. As in other types of cancer, PS represents a recognized prognostic factor, and the life expectancy for PS2 patients is nearly half that of the PS0/1 patients. Even if single-agent chemotherapy still remains the reference treatment, recent data suggest a role for new agents or combination chemotherapy in these patients. A large Phase III randomized trial comparing single-agent versus combination chemotherapy is strongly needed.

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly

Systemic chemotherapy provides improvement in both survival and quality of life for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Elderly patients have more comorbidities and tend to tolerate more poorly aggressive chemotherapy and radiation therapy than younger individuals. Our purpose in this article is to summarize recent studies of single-agent chemotherapy and combination regimens with cytotoxic or targeted therapies in the management of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. We have reviewed the available evidence in the literature to gauge the results of therapy for elderly patients with lung cancer. We found that single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard of care for nonselected elderly patients. Retrospective analyses suggest that the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy is similar in fit older and younger patients, with increased but acceptable toxicity for elderly patients. Therefore, the outcomes in the fit elderly mirror results observed in younger patients, although toxicity is generally greater.