Enhancing Dendritic Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors with Immunomodulating Conventional Treatment

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent antigen-presenting cells and are the key initiator of tumor-specific immune responses. These characteristics are exploited by DC therapy, where DCs are ex vivo loaded with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and used to induce tumor-specific immune responses. Unfortunately, clinical responses remain limited to a proportion of the patients. Tumor characteristics and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) of the tumor are likely hampering efficacy of DC therapy. Therefore, reducing the immunosuppressive TME by combining DC therapy with other treatments could be a promising strategy. Initially, conventional cancer therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, were thought to specifically target cancerous cells. Recent insights indicate that these therapies additionally augment tumor immunity by targeting immunosuppressive cell subsets in the TME, inducing immunogenic cell death (ICD), or blocking inhibitory molecules. Therefore, combining DC therapy with registered therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or checkpoint inhibitors could be a promising treatment strategy to improve the efficacy of DC therapy. In this review, we evaluate various clinical applicable combination strategies to improve the efficacy of DC therapy.

Immune alterations in malignant melanoma and current immunotherapy concepts

INTRODUCTION

Malignant melanoma is a highly aggressive, immunogenic tumor that has the ability to modulate the immune system to its own advantage. Patients with melanoma present numerous cellular immune defects and cytokine abnormalities, all leading to suppression of the host anti-tumor immune response. Innovative treatment strategies can be achieved through employing our knowledge of the melanoma-induced immune alterations.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review comprehensively the immune abnormalities in individuals with melanoma, and provide a summary of currently available melanoma immunotherapy agents that are currently on the market or undergoing clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the CTLA-4, is one of the current forefront treatment strategies in malignant melanoma. Novel immunomodulating agents have shown clear activity in patients with malignant melanoma. These include anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 ligand antibodies that may soon become important items in the anti-melanoma armamentarium. Combinations of different immunotherapy agents, between themselves or with other agents, are currently being studied in an attempt to further enhance the antineoplastic effect in patients with malignant melanoma.

Comparative clinical benefits of systemic adjuvant therapy for paradigm solid tumors

Adjuvant therapy employing cytotoxic chemotherapy, molecularly targeted agents, immunologic, and hormonal agents has shown a significant impact upon a variety of solid tumors. The principles that guide adjuvant therapy differ among various tumor types and specific modalities, but generally indicate a greater impact of therapy in the postsurgical setting of micrometastatic disease, for which adjuvant therapy is commonly pursued, vs. the setting of gross unresectable disease. This review of adjuvant therapies in current use for five major solid tumors highlights the rationale for current effective adjuvant therapy, and draws comparisons between the adjuvant regimens that have found application in solid tumors.

Overcoming immunological tolerance to melanoma: Targeting CTLA-4

Abstract The use of immunotherapeutics in melanoma has received much attention, and recent advances to further characterize the regulatory components of the immune system and the importance of co-stimulatory molecules have opened a new area for clinical investigation. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) serves as a negative regulator of immunity. Recent trials administering fully human anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies to melanoma patients have demonstrated clinically meaningful responses. Treatment with CTLA-4 blocking antibodies, however, is not without potential toxicities. Autoimmune side-effects, the most common being colitis-associated diarrhea, are frequently associated with clinical responses. In efforts to build upon prior vaccination efforts as well as attempt to offer patients clinically meaningful immune responses with a CTLA-4 blockade but without significant toxicities, we conducted a clinical trial in patients who previously received autologous tumor cells engineered to secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GVAX; Cell Genesys, South San Francisco, CA, USA) with periodic infusions of CTLA-4 blocking antibodies. This sequential treatment resulted in clinically significant anti-tumor immunity without grade 3 or 4 toxicity in most patients. Pathological analyses following treatment of pre-existing tumors revealed a linear correlation between tumor necrosis and the ratio of intra-tumoral CD8+ effector cells to FoxP3+ regulatory cells (T(regs)). Effective anti-tumor immunity and serious autoimmunity can be disassociated. Further targeting of anti-tumor T(regs)in combinatorial therapy approaches may be a rich avenue of future investigation.

Systemic therapy of non-resectable metastatic melanoma

In advanced metastatic melanoma (non-resectable stage III/IV), the prognosis still remains poor, with median survival times between six and twelve months. Systemic therapeutic approaches for metastatic melanoma include chemotherapy, immunotherapy, immunochemotherapy, small molecules and targeted therapy. In this review, we will focus on the various treatment modalities as well as new agents used for targeted therapy.

Immunotherapy of distant metastatic disease

Immunotherapy of metastatic melanoma consists of various approaches leading to specific or non-specific immunomodulation. The use of FDA-approved interleukin (IL)-2 alone, in combination with interferon alpha, and/or with various chemotherapeutic agents (biochemotherapy) is associated with significant toxicity and poor efficacy that does not improve overall survival of 96% of patients. Many studies with allogeneic and autologous vaccines have demonstrated no clinical benefit, and some randomised trials even showed a detrimental effect in the vaccine arm. The ongoing effort to develop melanoma vaccines based on dendritic cells and peptides is driven by advances in understanding antigen presentation and processing, and by new techniques of vaccine preparation, stabilisation and delivery. Several agents that have shown promising activity in metastatic melanoma including IL-21 and monoclonal antibodies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) or CD137 are discussed. Recent advances of intratumour gene transfer technologies and adoptive immunotherapy, which represents a promising although technically challenging direction, are also discussed.

Costimulatory and coinhibitory receptors in anti-tumor immunity

SUMMARY

Despite the expression of antigens by tumor cells, spontaneous immune-mediated rejection of cancer seems to be a rare event. T-cell receptor engagement by peptide/major histocompatibility complexes constitutes the main signal for the activation of naive T cells but is not sufficient to initiate a productive generation and maintenance of effector cells. Full activation of T cells requires additional signals driven by costimulatory molecules present on activated antigen-presenting cells but rarely on tumors. Following the discovery of B7-1 (CD80), several other costimulatory molecules have been shown to contribute to T-cell activation and have relevance for improving anti-tumor immunity. Moreover, increasing the understanding of coinhibitory receptors has highlighted key additional pathways that can dominantly inhibit anti-tumor T-cell function. Improving positive costimulation, and interfering with negative regulation, continues to represent an attractive immunotherapeutic approach for the treatment of cancer. This review focuses upon those pathways with the highest potential for clinical application in human cancer patients.

Overcoming immunologic tolerance to melanoma: targeting CTLA-4 with tremelimumab (CP-675,206)

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) blockade therapies have been evaluated in clinical trials and have shown promise as possible options for treating patients with cancer. One agent under investigation is tremelimumab (CP-675,206), a monoclonal antibody that has been demonstrated to be a safe and efficacious treatment in patients with malignant melanoma. Results of a phase I clinical trial suggested that a dose of 15 mg/kg of tremelimumab would be the maximum-tolerated dose, with the most common grade 3-4 toxicities being diarrhea and rash. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that the postinfusion plasma concentration and area under the plasma disposition curve both increased in an approximately proportional manner with dose. Studies also showed that tremelimumab has a low clearance (0.132 ml/h x kg), a small volume of distribution (81.2 ml/kg), and a long terminal-phase half-life (22.1 days). A pivotal phase II clinical trial assessing single-agent tremelimumab as second-line therapy in metastatic melanoma has completed accrual, with response rate as the primary endpoint. A pivotal phase III trial has also completed accrual; that study compared the overall survival of previously untreated patients receiving single-agent tremelimumab versus dacarbazine or temozolomide.

Overcoming immunologic tolerance to melanoma: targeting CTLA-4 with ipilimumab (MDX-010)

Targeted biologic therapies such as anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibodies, either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or vaccines, have shown great promise in late-stage melanoma, which has a very poor prognosis. Melanoma is relatively resistant to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Blockade of CTLA-4, which inhibits T-cell proliferation, promotes stimulation of adaptive immunity and T-cell activation, resulting in eradication of tumor cells. Two human monoclonal antibodies are under investigation in melanoma. Phase II and III clinical trials are currently evaluating the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab (MDX-010, Medarex, Inc., Princeton, NJ, and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) and tremelimumab (CP-675,206; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, New York) in melanoma. Data are available on ipilimumab, which has been explored as monotherapy and in combination with vaccines, other immunotherapies such as interleukin-2, and chemotherapies such as dacarbazine. Overall response rates range from 13% with ipilimumab plus vaccine in patients with stage IV disease to 17% and 22% with ipilimumab plus dacarbazine or interleukin-2, respectively, in patients with metastatic disease. Responses have been durable, and among those experiencing grade 3 or 4 autoimmune toxicities, even higher response rates have been seen--up to 36%. While the optimal dose of ipilimumab has yet to be established, studies also indicate that higher doses may be more effective. Importantly, the lack of an initial clinical response may not predict ultimate treatment failure, because the onset of a response may follow progressive disease or stable disease. Pending results from registration studies with ipilimumab and lessons learned from registration studies conducted with tremelimumab will help to define the role of anti-CTLA-4 blockade in the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Cell intrinsic mechanisms of T-cell inhibition and application to cancer therapy

Establishing a balance between the rapid generation of effective immunity and the production of overly exuberant or excessively prolonged responses is critical to the maintenance of the equilibrium between health and disease. The preservation of homeostasis and prevention of inappropriate activation of immunity is safeguarded by systems integrating the influences of T-cell receptor signaling, pro-inflammatory danger signals, and positive costimulatory signals on the one hand with those of several layers of both cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic inhibitory checkpoints on the other. Evolution has thus provided an immunological system capable of clearance of pathogens and infected cells but which generally avoids the severe collateral damage that is associated with failure to control immunity. Central tolerance to self-antigens constitutes the first line of defense against self-destruction. Because central tolerance mechanisms fail to eliminate all self-reactive immune effector cells, other immune-regulating (peripheral tolerance) mechanisms are required to prevent excessive immune responses. Dysfunction of these inhibitory pathways in terms of reduced activity can result in the unmasking of self-directed responses and a variety of autoimmune morbidities. Conversely, enhanced inhibitory activity can restrict the generation of clinically useful immunity to cancers and to chronic infectious pathogens. This may manifest not only as inhibition of immunity directed towards what are largely aberrantly or overexpressed 'self' targets on malignant cells but also additional exaggeration of inhibitory pathway activity mediated via upregulation on tumor cells or stromal tissues of the ligands for inhibitory receptors expressed by lymphocytes. The selective pressures exerted by immuno-editing will favor the outgrowth of such immuno-evasive malignant clones. These pathways therefore represent significant hurdles to the generation of therapeutic anti-cancer responses. The most active of the T-cell intrinsic inhibitory pathways belong to the immunoglobulin superfamily, which occupies a central importance in the coordination of immune responses. The CD28/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4):B7-1/B7-2 receptor/ligand grouping represents the archetypal example of these immune regulators. Therapies aimed at overcoming these mechanisms of peripheral tolerance, in particular by blocking the inhibitory checkpoints, offer the potential to generate anti-tumor activity, either as monotherapies or in synergism with other therapies that directly or indirectly enhance presentation of tumor epitopes to the immune system.

CTLA-4: negative regulator of the immune response and a target for cancer therapy

A novel approach for cancer immunotherapy is to augment T-cell-mediated immunity by blocking inhibitory signals that suppress T-cell function. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is a key negative regulator of T-cell activation. CTLA-4 blockade using anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) potentiates the T-cell response against tumors, and preliminary data on these agents demonstrate good efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma and other cancers. This paper will review data from studies with anti-CTLA-4 mAbs to date, discuss some of the key clinical considerations emerging from early clinical trials with this therapeutic strategy, and provide an overview of ongoing and planned clinical trials for anti-CTLA-4 mAb therapy in metastatic melanoma and other cancers.

Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 antibody: the first in an emerging class of immunomodulatory antibodies for cancer treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the emerging role of immunomodulatory antibodies in cancer treatment. Antibodies (ipilimumab and tremelimumab) targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), an inhibitory molecule on T cells, represent the vanguard of these new drugs.

DESIGN

We performed a systematic review of the clinical studies examining the clinical activity of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. We also review the potential mechanisms and toxicities associated with these treatments.

RESULTS

Clinical activity with anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) has paved the way for additional T-cell immunomodulatory monoclonal antibody (mAb) approaches for the treatment of cancer to be investigated. Because anti-CTLA-4 mAbs target the immune system and not the tumor, they may provide significant potential advantages over traditional antitumor mAbs, chemotherapies, and immunotherapies (ie, vaccines and cytokines). Other antibodies, such as CD137 agonists, CD40 agonists, and PD-1 antagonists, are currently in various stages of preclinical and clinical development.

CONCLUSION

Available clinical data suggest that anti-CTLA-4 mAbs are very different from traditional mAbs, chemotherapies, and immunotherapies in terms of patterns of response, duration of response, and adverse event profile. Ongoing clinical studies aim to establish the efficacy and safety of anti-CTLA-4 mAbs as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of metastatic melanoma and a variety of other cancer types.

Next generation of immunotherapy for melanoma

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy has a long history with striking but limited success in patients with melanoma. To date, interleukin-2 and interferon-alfa2b are the only approved immunotherapeutic agents for melanoma in the United States.

DESIGN

Tumor evasion of host immune responses, and strategies for overcoming tumor-induced immunosuppression are reviewed. Several novel immunotherapies currently in worldwide phase III clinical testing for melanoma are discussed.

RESULTS

The limitations of immunotherapy for melanoma stem from tumor-induced mechanisms of immune evasion that render the host tolerant of tumor antigens. For example, melanoma inhibits the maturation of antigen-presenting cells, preventing full T-cell activation and downregulating the effector antitumor immune response. New immunotherapies targeting critical regulatory elements of the immune system may overcome tolerance and promote a more effective antitumor immune response. These include monoclonal antibodies that block the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) and toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonists. Blockade of CTLA4 prevents inhibitory signals that downregulate T-cell activation. TLR9 agonists stimulate dendritic cell maturation and ultimately induce a more effective immune response. These approaches have been shown to stimulate acute immune activation with concomitant appearance of transient adverse events mediated by the immune system. The pattern and duration of immune responses associated with these new modalities differ from those associated with cytokines and cytotoxic agents. In addition, vaccines are being developed that may ultimately target melanoma either alone or in combination with these immunomodulatory therapies.

CONCLUSION

The successes of cytokine and interferon therapy of melanoma, coupled with an array of new approaches, are generating new enthusiasm for the immunotherapy of melanoma.