A Phase II Efficacy and Safety, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Imprime PGG Injection in Combination With Cetuximab in Patients With Stage IV KRAS-Mutant Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Imprime PGG (β(1,6)-[poly-(1,3)-D-glucopyranosyl]-poly-β(1,3)-D-glucopyranose) is an innate immune cell modulator that primes neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages to exert antitumor activity against complement opsonized tumor cells. In patients with KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer (CRC), cetuximab alone is ineffective; however, it can bind to tumor cells and induce opsonization for recognition by Imprime PGG-bound innate immune cells. The primary objective of this study was to determine the antitumor activity of Imprime PGG in combination with cetuximab in patients with KRAS-mutant metastatic CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study had a 2-stage Simon optimal design with 80% power to detect a target objective response rate (ORR) of ≥10% at a 10% significance level. Patients received weekly Imprime PGG (4 mg/kg) and cetuximab (loading dose, 400 mg/m(2), then 250 mg/m(2)) intravenously. The primary end point was ORR; secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, progression-free survival, and safety. Stage 1 of the study was to enroll 17 evaluable patients.

RESULTS

One partial response (5.6%) was observed among 18 patients enrolled into stage 1. Median DOR was 4.2 months, TTP 2.7 months, and OS 6.6 months. Overall, observed toxicity was as expected from cetuximab alone. The most common (≥20%) adverse events related to Imprime PGG were fatigue (7 patients; 38.9%), infusion reaction (4 patients; 22.2%), and headache (4 patients; 22.2%). There was no Grade 4 toxicity nor treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Imprime PGG in combination with cetuximab treatment in patients with KRAS-mutant CRC showed compelling, albeit modest, clinical activity. This study provides proof of principle that Imprime PGG, in combination with complement-activating antibodies, is associated with clinical activity.

Personalized colon cancer care in 2010

Colon cancer (CC) therapies have improved patient outcomes significantly over the last decades in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings. With the introduction of a number of novel agents, both traditional chemotherapies and biologically targeted agents, the need to identify subgroups that are likely and not likely to respond to a particular treatment regimen is paramount. This will allow patients who are likely to benefit to receive optimal care, while sparing those unlikely to benefit from unnecessary toxicity and cost. With the identification of several novel biomarkers and a variety of technologies to interrogate the genome, we already are able to rapidly study patient tumor or blood samples and normal tissues to generate a large dataset of aberrations within the cancer. How to digest this complex information to obtain accurate, reliable, and meaningful results that will allow us to provide truly personalized care for CC patients is just starting to be addressed. In this article, we briefly review the history of CC treatment, with an emphasis on current clinical standards that incorporate a "personalized medicine" approach. We then review strategies that will potentially improve our ability to individualize therapy in the future.

Use of K-Ras as a predictive biomarker for selecting anti-EGF receptor/pathway treatment

Ras protein is a downstream regulator of multiple cellular receptor tyrosine kinases, mediating cell growth, transformation and maintenance of the malignant phenotype in several human cancers. Oncogenic gain-of-function mutations in ras frequently occur in colorectal cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancers. Recent clinical studies of colorectal cancer have revealed that the therapeutic efficacy of cetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against EGF receptor, depends on the presence of wild-type k-ras. Additional studies in non-small-cell lung cancer have suggested that the k-ras mutation may be a negative predictor of response to the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib. These observations have provoked an interest in utilizing K-Ras as a predictive biomarker, allowing clinicians to direct the therapy of cancer patients based on their mutational status of the k-ras gene.

Current situation of Panitumumab, Matuzumab, Nimotuzumab and Zalutumumab

EGFR overexpression usually correlates with a more advanced disease stage, a poorer prognosis and a worse chemotherapy response. EGFR expression increase has been observed in many tumours. For all the aforementioned reasons, EGFR inhibition can be considered an attractive approach in cancer treatment. One strategy has been receptor inhibition of extracellular domain using monoclonal antibodies. Cetuximab is the most developed one and there is plenty information on the literature about its current status. In this review we focus on other EGFR monoclonal antibodies under clinical development. The more developed one is Panitumumab. Its clinical development is taking place very quickly and it has mainly been studied in colorectal cancer showing promising results. There are also other interesting drugs such as Matuzumab, Nimotuzumab and Zalutumumab.

Where to position monoclonal antibodies in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with modern cytotoxic agents in combination with monoclonal antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has improved median overall survival from 6 months to almost 2 years. Uncertainty remains over the optimal chemotherapy combination and sequencing, and to which line of treatment monoclonal antibodies should be added. This article reviews the rationale and evidence for the use of monoclonal antibodies in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in both general and specific situations, and provides a perspective on how to position their use in contemporary practice.

EGF-receptor targeting with monoclonal antibodies in colorectal carcinomas: rationale for a pharmacogenomic approach

Monoclonal antibodies directed against the EGF-receptor (EGFR) have recently been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with EGFR-positive tumors at immunohistochemistry (IHC). Surprisingly, data demonstrate a lack of correlation between the tumor’s EGFR expression at IHC and outcome. Indeed, as pointed out from small experiences, patients with EGFR-IHC-negative metastatic CRC have the same chance as EGFR-IHC-positive patients to benefit from an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, underlying the importance of different, more reliable, selection criteria. In particular, the identification of such predictive factors is important as these agents are expensive, have side effects and are really only effective in a minority of patients. Several potential clinical and biological predictive markers of activity and/or efficacy for such agents have been evaluated in retrospective series with promising results. Moving from clinical data suggesting that there could be a subpopulation of CRC patients that are more liable to benefit from anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, here we review major studies on determinants of outcome in this field.