Randomized Study of Temozolomide or Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (ECOG-ACRIN E2211)

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have few treatment options that yield objective responses. Retrospective and small prospective studies suggest that capecitabine and temozolomide are associated with high response rates (RRs) and long progression-free survival (PFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

E2211 was a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial comparing temozolomide versus capecitabine/temozolomide in patients with advanced low-grade or intermediate-grade pancreatic NETs. Key eligibility criteria included progression within the preceding 12 months and no prior temozolomide, dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide or dacarbazine, capecitabine or fluorouracil. The primary end point was PFS; secondary endpoints were overall survival, RR, safety, and methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) by immunohistochemistry and promoter methylation.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were enrolled between April 2013 and March 2016 to temozolomide (n = 72) or capecitabine and temozolomide (n = 72); the primary analysis population included 133 eligible patients. At the scheduled interim analysis in January 2018, the median PFS was 14.4 months for temozolomide versus 22.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.58), which was sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for the primary end point (stratified log-rank P = .022). In the final analysis (May 2021), the median overall survival was 53.8 months for temozolomide and 58.7 months for capecitabine/temozolomide (hazard ratio = 0.82, P = .42). MGMT deficiency was associated with response.

CONCLUSION

The combination of capecitabine/temozolomide was associated with a significant improvement in PFS compared with temozolomide alone in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. The median PFS and RR observed with capecitabine/temozolomide are the highest reported in a randomized study for pancreatic NETs. MGMT deficiency was associated with response, and although routine MGMT testing is not recommended, it can be considered for select patients in need of objective response (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01824875).

Exploring the Epigenome in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasias

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias are a diverse group of neoplasms with different characteristics in terms of site, biological behaviour and metastatic potential. In comparison to other cancers, they are genetically quiet, harbouring relatively few somatic mutations. It is increasingly becoming evident that epigenetic changes are as relevant, if not more so, as somatic mutations in promoting oncogenesis. Despite significant tumour heterogeneity, it is obvious that DNA methylation, histone and chromatin modifications and microRNA expression profiles are distinctive for GEP-NEN subtypes and may correlate with clinical outcome. This review summarises existing knowledge on epigenetic changes, identifying potential contributions to pathogenesis and oncogenesis. In particular, we focus on epigenetic changes pertaining to well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, which make up the bulk of NENs. We also highlight both similarities and differences within the subtypes of GEP-NETs and how these relate and compare to other types of cancers. We relate epigenetic understanding to existing treatments and explore how this knowledge may be exploited in the development of novel treatment approaches, such as in theranostics and combining conventional treatment modalities. We consider potential barriers to epigenetic research in GEP-NENs and discuss strategies to optimise research and development of new therapies.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors: what's new, what's old, and what's different?

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be subdivided into carcinoid and pancreatic NETs (panNETs). Recently, two therapies have been FDA approved for progressive well-differentiated pancreatic NETs but have not been submitted for use in carcinoid tumors (Yao, Shah, Ito, et al. N Engl J Med 364:514-23, 2011••; Raymond, Dahan, Raoul, et al. N Engl J Med 364:501-13, 2011••). The first is sunitinib (Sutent(®), Pfizer, Inc.), an orally administered, multitargeted receptor kinase inhibitor. The second targeted agent is everolimus (Afinitor(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals), a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor (Yao, Shah, Ito, et al. N Engl J Med 364:514-23, 2011••). Both agents demonstrated improved progression-free survival but can also result in non-trivial toxicities and therefore, should only be considered in patients with progressing or symptomatic pancreatic NET. This review will discuss "new" NET therapies and provides an overview of liver directed and "older" cytotoxic treatment options. We also briefly outline "what's different" by describing a recent genetics report identifying genetic mutations in panNETs. Such a discovery could potentially be used to stratify treatment and such studies are currently being investigated.

Novel anticancer agents in clinical trials for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare malignancies that arise from endocrine cells located in various anatomic locations, with a dramatic increase in incidence during the last 30 years. Limited therapeutic options are currently available for patients with advanced well-differentiated NETs, including carcinoids and pancreatic NETs. Streptozotocin-based chemotherapy and somatostatin analogues are drugs that are currently used for the treatment of progressive metastatic NETs. Recently, sunitinib demonstrating efficacy in pancreatic islet cell carcinomas has opened a new avenue for the treatment of NETs, and further trials shall be considered in NET types such as carcinoids, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and several other endocrine tumors that depend on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor for angiogenesis. In addition, drugs with distinct mechanisms of action, such as mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, currently investigated in phase 3 trials, may also supply novel options to control tumor growth and metastasis. Although acknowledged as rare tumors, recent data demonstrated the feasibility of large randomized trials in this disease. Furthermore, data from large trials also showed the importance of selecting an appropriate patient population when designing randomized studies. This review focuses on novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of well-differentiated NETs. Based on recent data, novel strategies may now be designed using those anticancer agents to optimize the current treatment of patients with NETs.

Progress in the development of prognostic and predictive markers for gastrointestinal malignancies

Gastrointestinal cancers remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. While increasing therapeutic options have improved outcomes for many patients, they have also complicated treatment decision-making. Unfortunately, most patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies die from their disease. Prognostic and predictive markers could improve treatment significantly by identifying patients who may or may not require a given therapy, and determining those most likely to benefit from a therapy. Candidates for such markers include blood antigens and circulating tumor cells, tumor enzyme and gene expression, and pharmacodynamic endpoints. In this review, we summarize reported and ongoing research to define and validate prognostic and predictive markers in gastrointestinal malignancies, with an emphasis on colorectal cancer and brief overview of pancreatic and neuroendocrine tumors.