Do patients with nephrotic syndrome have an increased risk of osteoporosis? A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether nephrotic syndrome (NS) and further corticosteroid (CS) use increase the risk of osteoporosis in Asian population during the period January 2000-December 2010.

DESIGN

Nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

All healthcare facilities in Taiwan.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 28 772 individuals were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

26 614 individuals with newly diagnosed NS between 2000 and 2010 were identified and included in out study. 26 614 individuals with no NS diagnosis prior to the index date were age matched as controls. Diagnosis of osteoporosis prior to the diagnosis of NS or the same index date was identified, age, sex and NS-associated comorbidities were adjusted.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

To identify risk differences in developing osteoporosis among patients with a medical history of NS.

RESULTS

After adjusting for covariates, osteoporosis risk was found to be 3.279 times greater in the NS cohort than in the non-NS cohort, when measured over 11 years after NS diagnosis. Stratification revealed that age older than 18 years, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidaemia, chronic kidney disease, liver cirrhosis and NS-related disease including diabetes mellitus, hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C infection, lymphoma and hypothyroidism, increased the risk of osteoporosis in the NS cohort, compared with the non-NS cohort. Additionally, osteoporosis risk was significantly higher in NS patients with CS use (adjusted HR (aHR)=3.397). The risk of osteoporosis in NS patients was positively associated with risk of hip and vertebral fracture (aHR=2.130 and 2.268, respectively). A significant association exists between NS and subsequent risk for osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

NS patients, particularly those treated with CS, should be evaluated for subsequent risk of osteoporosis.

Risk factors for treatment-related bone loss and osteoporosis in patients with follicular lymphoma

The survival rate of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has steadily improved. However, osteoporosis introduced by treatment is prevalent and associated with increased mortality and disability for patients with NHL. We aimed to investigate factors impacting bone mineral density (BMD) reduction and osteoporosis, and the trend of BMD after chemotherapy. Overall, 97 newly diagnosed patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) were retrospectively enrolled. CT attenuation values were measured to assess BMD levels. Although 73.2% of patients received calcium and vitamin D supplements, 44.3% showed significant BMD reduction, and baseline BMD and hemoglobin levels were the risk factors. 26.6% of patients newly developed osteoporosis post-chemotherapy where age and cumulative dose of glucocorticoid were risk factors. The results of 20 patients with consecutive follow-up showed that BMD continued to decline for 6 months post-chemotherapy and did not return to baseline values. Therefore, BMD evaluation and more positive anti-resorption treatments should be administered for high-risk patients.

Bone damage and health-related quality of life in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: closing the gaps

In the recent decades, remarkable successes have been recorded in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma to the point that today it represents one of the neoplasms with the highest rates of cure and with the highest life expectancy. Nonetheless, this raises the concern for the health of long- term survivors. Late side effects of treatments in synergy with other risk factors expose survivors to increased morbidity and impaired quality of life. In the complexity of the topics concerning these last aspects, an area of growing interest is that of bone damage that follows Hodgkin Lymphoma and its treatments. In this narrative review, we conducted our work through assessment of available evidence focusing on several aspects linking bone damage and quality of life with Hodgkin lymphoma and its treatments. At present, the problem of osteopenia and osteoporosis in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors is a theme for which awareness and knowledge need to be implemented.

Fracture risk among patients with cancer compared to individuals without cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer may be at increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture; however, gaps exist in the existing literature and the association between cancer and fracture requires further examination.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study of Ontario patients with cancer (breast, prostate, lung, gastrointestinal, haematologic) diagnosed between January 2007 to December 2018 and 1:1 matched non-cancer controls. The primary outcome was incident fracture (end of follow-up December 2019). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the relative fracture risk with sensitivity analysis accounting for competing risk of death.

RESULTS

Among 172,963 cancer patients with non-cancer controls, 70.6% of patients with cancer were <65 years old, 58% were female, and 9375 and 8141 fracture events were observed in the cancer and non-cancer group, respectively (median follow-up 6.5 years). Compared to non-cancer controls, patients with cancer had higher risk of fracture (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.14, p < 0.0001), which was also observed for both solid (aHR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13, p < 0.0001) and haematologic cancers (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity analysis accounting for competing risk of death did not change these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that patients with cancer are at modest risk of fractures compared to non-cancer controls.

Bone damage after chemotherapy for lymphoma: a real-world experience

BACKGROUND

Despite recent improvements in survival due to advances in treatment, the quality of life of patients with lymphoma may be compromised by the long-term complications of chemotherapy and steroid therapy. Among these, a potentially relevant problem is bone loss and the development of fragility fractures.

AIM

To provide further evidence of clinical or subclinical skeletal complications in correlation with biological variables and markers of bone disease in patients with complete response to therapy.

METHOD

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on subjects diagnosed with lymphoma with subsequent antineoplastic treatment, disease status after therapy defined as complete response disease for at least a year now. We performed: blood chemistry tests, imaging techniques and screening tools for the assessment of functional status and quality of life (SARC-F and mini-Osteoporosis Quality of Life).

RESULTS

Approximately 50% of patients had osteoporosis, with a prevalence of vertebral fractures of 65.5%. In most patients, we found hypovitaminosis D and high levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH). Furthermore, a statistically significant association was observed between high PTH levels and previous lymphoma treatment. Finally, the Mini-Osteoporosis Quality of life (mini-OQLQ) questionnaire demonstrated a loss of quality of life as a consequence of the change in bone status.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient treatment design for personalized chemotherapy would be desirable to reduce late effects on bone. Also, early prevention programs need to be applied before starting treatment. The most benefited subpopulations could be not only elderly but also young patients.

Low Bone Mineral Density and High Bone Turnover in Patients With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Who Receive Frontline Therapy: Results of a Multicenter Prospective Study

Chemotherapy associated osteoporosis is a severe problem in patients with malignant diseases as it increases the risk for fractures and deteriorates quality of life. There are very limited data in the literature for the effect of chemotherapy on bone metabolism of adult patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL). We prospectively evaluated bone remodeling pre- and post-chemotherapy in 61 patients with newly diagnosed NHL. First-line chemotherapy resulted in high bone turnover, which led to increased bone loss and reduced bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine (L1-L4) and femur neck (FN). The reduction of L1-L4 and FN BMD post-chemo was more profound in males and in older patients (>55 years). Patients who received 8 cycles of chemotherapy had a greater reduction of L1-L4 and FN BMD as compared to 6 cycles. The administration of chemotherapy also resulted in a dramatic increase of bone resorption markers (CTX and TRACP-5b), bone formation markers, (bALP and Osteocalcin) and of osteoblast regulator Dickkopf-1. During study period, one patient had a pathological fracture in his right FN.

Zoledronic acid for prevention of bone loss in patients receiving primary therapy for lymphomas: a prospective, randomized controlled phase III trial

In patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma, low bone mineral density (BMD) is common at diagnosis and worsens with therapy. Our randomized phase III trial demonstrates that 2 doses of zoledronic acid (ZA) and supplementation with calcium and vitamin D effectively prevent further bone loss.

BACKGROUND

Patients with lymphoma are at risk of development of bone mineral density (BMD) loss from therapy with high-dose corticosteroids and alkylating agents. Zoledronic acid (ZA), a bisphosphonate, may prevent this complication of therapy. We evaluated the effect of ZA on the change in BMD and surrogate biomarkers in patients with lymphoma receiving initial chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Our phase III trial randomized 74 patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma and a baseline BMD of ≥ -2.0 to receive oral calcium and vitamin D daily with or without ZA at enrollment and at 6 months after enrollment. BMD was evaluated at baseline and 1 year after enrollment. Secondary biomarker endpoints were collected at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment.

RESULTS

Forty-three percent of patients had baseline osteopenia. Fifty-three patients were evaluable for response: 24 received ZA and had stable BMD during the observation period, whereas 29 patients in the control group had decreased BMD (P < .05 at lumbar spine and bilateral femoral neck). Twenty-one randomized patients were not evaluable for response because of lymphoma progression or death, withdrawn consent/incomplete testing, or ineligibility. Bone biomarkers were higher in the control group at all intervals after treatment (P < .001). No fractures or intervention-related toxicities were observed during this trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Newly diagnosed patients with lymphoma are at risk of low BMD, which may worsen with therapy. Treatment with ZA effectively stabilizes BMD and prevents bone loss. Our data suggest that BMD testing and prophylaxis should be considered as an early intervention for a preventable problem.

Bone Loss in Patients with Previously Untreated Lymphoma: The Effect of Periodontal Disease on the Use of Zoledronic Acid

Treatment of lymphoma with alkylating agents and steroids is known to cause bone loss and increased fracture risk. These effects result from multiple causes including systemic lymphoma-related cytokine activity, steroid-mediated bone loss, and therapy-induced hypogonadism. Furthermore, over half of all untreated lymphoma patients are either osteopenic or osteoporotic at the time of diagnosis.1,2 Pamidronate is known to reduce bone loss and risk of vertebral fractures in lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy. However, the effects of the more potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid in this setting are unknown. Therefore, we report on an ongoing phase III trial designed to evaluate the effect of zoledronic acid on the change in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with newly-diagnosed lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy. In total, 72 patients will be randomized to either the control arm consisting of therapy with calcium carbonate (1200 mg orally per day) plus vitamin D (400 mg orally per day), or the bisphosphonate arm consisting of therapy with calcium carbonate and vitamin D as in the control arm plus zoledronic acid (4 mg IV given at baseline and at 6 months). The primary endpoint of the study is to compare the absolute change between the baseline and 12-month measures of BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral necks. Thus far, 97 patients have been screened for enrollment. Twenty-four patients (24.7%) failed screening due to periodontal disease, a predetermined exclusion criterion of the study. Twenty-three patients have been randomized to the control arm, and 18 patients have been randomized to the bisphosphonate arm. To date, 11 patients in the control arm and 7 patients in the bisphosphonate arm have completed the one-year follow up period including baseline and one-year BMD evaluations. In comparing the change in BMD at one year of patients in the control arm to that of patients in the bisphosphonate arm, the average change in T scores at the lumber spine was −0.482 vs. 0, at the left femoral neck was −0.218 vs. 0.057, and at the right femoral neck was −0.309 vs. 0.243, respectively. There have been no therapy-related serious adverse events in either arm of the study. In addition, no occurrences of osteonecrosis of the jaw have been noted. In conclusion, treatment with the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid in combination with calcium carbonate and vitamin D supplementation appears to provide prevention of bone loss or improvement in the BMD of patients with lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy. Given the large number of patients with below-average BMD prior to therapy and the known deleterious effects of lymphoma therapy on bone density, baseline BMD evaluation may be warranted in all lymphoma patients. In addition, the unexpectedly high rate of periodontal disease in this patient population further supports the need for careful dental evaluation prior to the consideration of bisphosphonate therapy given the well-described, albeit rare, risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw from zoledronic acid.