A multicenter phase II study of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab in first-line therapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous cell histology non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

INTRODUCTION

Platinum-based doublets are standard of care for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The combination of docetaxel and oxaliplatin has shown acceptable toxicity and encouraging activity. This phase II study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of this doublet with bevacizumab as first-line treatment for stage IIIB/IV NSCLC.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients ≥18 years with histologically proven non-squamous NSCLC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≤2 received six 21-day cycles of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab followed by single-agent bevacizumab for a total of 1 year. Primary efficacy end point was radiographically documented progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure, and safety.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were enrolled. Median age was 62.0 years, 71.7 % male, 79.2 % Caucasian. A total of 88.7 % had stage IV or recurrent disease; 94.3 % adenocarcinoma; and 94.3 % ECOG PS 0 or 1. Efficacy results are as follows: median PFS 5.6 months, ORR 30.2 % (complete response 1.9 %, partial response 28.3 %); 37.7 % stable disease; and OS 14.0 months. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported in all patients (n = 52); 98.1 % of AEs were treatment related. The most common treatment-emergent grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (15.4 %), diarrhea (13.5 %), and fatigue (11.5 %). A serious AE was present in 32.7 %; the most common were pneumonia (7.7 %) and abdominal pain (5.8 %). Dehydration, diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, sepsis, and supraventricular tachycardia each occurred in 3.8 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of bevacizumab to docetaxel/oxaliplatin is effective with an acceptable safety profile in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC.

Combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapies in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer in the world. One third of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed with locally or regionally advanced unresectable disease at presentation. Currently, in this stage of disease, a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the standard treatment approach for patients with good performance status, and concomitant chemo-radiotherapy has demonstrated to be the best therapeutic approach. However, despite improvements in treatment, local tumor control remains suboptimal and distant metastases remain the major site of failure. The diversity of molecular abnormalities in NSCLC may partly contribute to its resistance to therapy. It is therefore widely accepted that one approach to improve the efficacy of cancer therapy is the development of rational combinations of anticancer agents that may exhibit synergistic interactions. The introduction of several biologic agents represents an important advance in the management of NSCLC and some of them have shown to have a synergistic effect when given in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy in preclinical and in clinical models. In the present review we discuss the rationale and the feasibility of these combinations and the first results available from clinical trials.

Figitumumab (CP-751,871) for cancer therapy

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Figitumumab is being developed as a highly potent and specific fully human IgG2 monoclonal antibody against the IGF Type 1 receptor (IGF-IR) for the treatment of cancer.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This manuscript reviews the rationale, preclinical data and early clinical results of the figitumumab development program. Early trials were initiated in 2003 and initial reports appeared in 2006.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Figitumumab has an effective half life of approximately 20 days and has been generally well tolerated in clinical trials. Initial pharmacodynamic studies suggested that IGF-IR overexpression and increased bioactivity of IGFs constitute independent mechanisms of tumor sensitivity to figitumumab. Single-agent activity has been noted in Ewing's sarcoma and a recently completed proof-of-concept study suggested that figitumumab may be active in NSCLC.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The strong biologic rationale for IGF-IR targeting in multiple types of human cancer and the feasibility of combination with full doses of therapies that constitute the standard of care in a variety of oncology indications have justified an expanded clinical program in multiple areas of unmet medical need in oncology.

Targeted therapies for non-small cell lung cancer: an evolving landscape

Over the past decade, a multitude of targeted agents have been explored in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus far, two broad classes of agents have been implemented in clinical practice: (a) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-directed therapies and (b) antagonists of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In the former category, the agent bevacizumab (a monoclonal antibody) has shown landmark improvements in survival when added to cytotoxic therapy. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting the VEGF receptor (i.e., sunitinib, sorafenib, and vandetanib) show activity in phase II clinical studies. With respect to EGFR-directed therapies, the TKIs gefitinib and erlotinib have shown significant benefit, and have uncovered valuable information about the biology of lung cancer. Outside of therapies directed specifically at VEGF- and EGFR-mediated signaling, trials evaluating insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR)-targeting agents, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, c-met inhibitors, irreversible pan-HER inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors are ongoing. Inhibitors of ALK show great promise in patients with the relevant gene translocation. Herein, the clinical development of novel therapies for NSCLC is described, including some discussion of relevant biomarkers and determination of synergy with both cytotoxic therapy and other targeted agents.

Targeted therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer--is it becoming a reality?

Treatment outcomes in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unsatisfactory, with low long-term survival rates. Palliative chemotherapy offers a median survival not exceeding 1 year. To date, various combinations of cytotoxic drugs have not improved treatment results beyond what has been observed with platinum doublets. By contrast, molecular targeted drugs may block important pathways that drive cancer progression and achieve long-term disease control. Conflicting results have demonstrated marginal benefit with EGFR inhibitors, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies and antiangiogenic strategies in unselected populations of patients with advanced NSCLC. However, patients with an EGFR mutation are likely to respond to agents that target this gene. Novel targeted therapies that interfere with insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, or the EML4-ALK fusion protein have shown promising activity. Aberrations in other key signaling pathways and molecules, such as RAS/RAF/MEK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, or MET kinase, have been identified as crucial targets, especially in resistant patients. Novel drugs aimed at these abnormalities are already in the clinic. This Review outlines the current state-of-the-art research for targeted therapy in NSCLC.

[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: current state and future]

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. The combination of chemotherapy and surgery is a standard of care for resectable NSCLC. If the adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still debated. Most trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were closed when the positive studies of adjuvant chemotherapy were published. Only the Spanish trial NATCH, designed to compare the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the adjuvant chemotherapy, was fully completed. Therefore, the trials of preoperative chemotherapy lack strength to become proof of concept. Confirmation will come from meta-analyses. Two of them are positive. Others are in progress. The current research is to select the patients according to predictive factors to chemotherapy response.

[First-line chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell carcinoma: what are the options]

Until recently, first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was based on ASCO guidelines. Since several years, first-line chemotherapy is a platin-based doublet for patients with a good performans status. For elderly or unfit patients, a single-drug chemotherapy or a combination without cisplatin was recommended. The association of an anti-angiogenic therapy, bevacizumab, with carboplatin-paclitaxel or cisplatin-gemcitabine regimens improves progression-free survival for patients with non-epidermoid tumors. The combination of cisplatin and pemetrexed is better in terms of survival than cisplatine-gemcitabine in these tumors. The choice of treatment according to histology is becoming a new concept. Another is maintenance therapy. The main objective is to reduce duration of platin-based chemotherapy while improving quality of life and progression-free survival. This concept is ongoing validation. The combination of cetuximab with platin-chemotherapy improves survival for all histologic types. We should integrate this new approach among other available treatments. First-line therapy for advanced NSCLC is changing. In the future, first-line therapy will be chosen according to clinical features and biomarkers such as gene mutations of EGFR.

[Towards a histologically guided management for NSCLC]

Currently the management of non-small cell lung cancer with first line chemotherapy is dependent on the histology. The growth of morbid anatomy laboratories and molecular biology, alongside the rapid expansion of new therapies, is necessary for the selection of patients according to predictive criteria of efficacy and tolerance, allowing definition of a made to measure treatment.

Phase 1b study of motesanib, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or panitumumab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Motesanib is a small-molecule antagonist of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, 2, and 3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and Kit. This phase 1b study assessed the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics, and explored the objective response of motesanib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or the fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody panitumumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with unresectable NSCLC received sequentially escalating doses of motesanib [50, 125 mg once daily; 75 mg twice daily] orally continuously plus carboplatin/paclitaxel (arm A; first line) or panitumumab (arm B; first and second line) once every 21-day cycle or 125 mg once daily plus carboplatin/paclitaxel and panitumumab (arm C; first line).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients received motesanib. Three dose-limiting toxicities occurred: grade 4 pulmonary embolism (n = 1; arm A, 50 mg once daily) and grade 3 deep vein thrombosis (n = 2; arm A, 125 mg once daily; arm C). The MTD was 125 mg once daily. Common motesanib-related adverse events were fatigue (60% of patients), diarrhea (53%), hypertension, (38%), anorexia (27%), and nausea (22%). Three cases of cholecystitis occurred but only in the 75-mg twice-daily schedule, which was subsequently discontinued. At 125 mg once daily, motesanib pharmacokinetics were not markedly changed with carboplatin/paclitaxel coadministration; however, exposure to paclitaxel was moderately increased. The objective response rates were 17%, 0%, and 17% in arms A, B, and C, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with motesanib was tolerable when combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or panitumumab, with little effect on motesanib pharmacokinetics at the 125-mg once daily dose level. This dose is being investigated in an ongoing phase 3 study in NSCLC.

Histologic considerations for individualized systemic therapy approaches for the management of non-small cell lung cancer

Over the past 5 to 10 years, we have reached a treatment plateau using standard platinum-based doublets in an unselected population of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent studies have focused on improving patient outcomes with new chemotherapeutic or targeted agents, as well as on individualizing therapy on the basis of patient characteristics such as tumor histology and biomarker analysis. This article summarizes recent data on histologic response determinants to chemotherapy and targeted therapy, with particular attention to the importance of standardized tissue collection, handling, storage, and analysis techniques, in order to best apply the results of tumor analysis to patient-care decisions. Such decisions are related to both improving patient safety and optimizing efficacy with standard chemotherapy as well as newer targeted therapy agents. This entails a change from a generalized approach in treating patients with NSCLC to an individualized strategy based on tumor histology.

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thalidomide in combination with gemcitabine and Carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Cancers rely on angiogenesis for their growth and dissemination. We hypothesized that thalidomide, an oral antiangiogenic agent, when combined with chemotherapy, and as maintenance treatment, would improve survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven hundred twenty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or thalidomide capsules 100 to 200 mg daily for up to 2 years. All patients received gemcitabine and carboplatin every 3 weeks for up to four cycles. End points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, grade 3/4 toxicity, and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

The median OS rates were 8.9 months (placebo) and 8.5 months (thalidomide). The hazard ratio (HR) was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.32; P = .12). The 2-year survival rate was 16% and 12% in the placebo and thalidomide arms, respectively. The PFS results were consistent with those for OS. The risk of having a thrombotic event was increased by 74% in the thalidomide group: HR of 1.74 (95% CI, 1.20 to 2.52; P = .003). There were no differences in hematologic toxicities, but a slight excess of rash and neuropathy in the thalidomide group. QoL scores were similar but thalidomide was associated with less insomnia, and more constipation and peripheral neuropathy. In a retrospective analysis, patients with nonsquamous histology in the thalidomide group had a poorer survival: 2-year risk difference of 10% (95% CI, 4% to 16%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In this large trial of patients with NSCLC, thalidomide in combination with chemotherapy did not improve survival overall, but increased the risk of thrombotic events. Unexpectedly, survival was significantly worse in patients with nonsquamous histology.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major global health problem and represents the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The majority of patients with NSCLC are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, and the prognosis for such patients is poor. The currently approved cytotoxic chemotherapy is associated with substantial limitations in both efficacy and safety. The availability of agents targeted against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as well as the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab, have provided some clinical benefit. Nonetheless, the efficacy of these agents is also inadequate, and resistance has emerged as a clinical problem. Numerous novel targeted therapies are now in clinical development and may have potential for overcoming the limitations associated with currently available agents. In this article we review clinical data for molecular-targeted therapies in NSCLC, with emphasis on EGFR inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents.

Phase II, multicenter, uncontrolled trial of single-agent sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK mitogenic signaling pathway and the angiogenic receptor tyrosine kinases, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta. We evaluated the antitumor response and tolerability of sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most of whom had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a phase II, single-arm, multicenter study. Patients with relapsed or refractory advanced NSCLC received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily until tumor progression or an unacceptable drug-related toxicity occurred. The primary objective was to measure response rate.

RESULTS

Of 54 patients enrolled, 52 received sorafenib. The predominant histologies were adenocarcinoma (54%) and squamous cell carcinoma (31%). No complete or partial responses were observed. Stable disease (SD) was achieved in 30 (59%) of the 51 patients who were evaluable for efficacy. Four patients with SD developed tumor cavitation. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months, and median overall survival was 6.7 months. Patients with SD had a median PFS of 5.5 months. Major grades 3 to 4, treatment-related toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction (10%), hypertension (4%), fatigue (2%), and diarrhea (2%). Nine patients died within a 30-day period after discontinuing sorafenib, and one patient experienced pulmonary hemorrhage that was considered drug related. CONCLUSION Continuous treatment with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was associated with disease stabilization in patients with advanced NSCLC. The broad activity of sorafenib and its acceptable toxicity profile suggest that additional investigation of sorafenib as therapy for patients with NSCLC is warranted.

Current status of cediranib: the rapid development of a novel anti-angiogenic therapy

Angiogenesis, the process whereby tumors develop new blood vessels to facilitate growth and metastasis, is a pivotal event in tumorigenesis. It is tightly regulated by the VEGF system. Cediranib (AZD2171, Recentin; AstraZeneca, London, UK) is a novel and potent small-molecule inhibitor of VEGF signaling, with activity against the three VEGF receptors, as well as other targets. This article provides a comprehensive and up-to-date synopsis of all pertinent preclinical and clinical studies detailing this promising new therapy.

Phase II study of pemetrexed and carboplatin plus bevacizumab with maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab as first-line therapy for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB (effusion) or stage IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2), carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for six cycles. For patients with response or stable disease, pemetrexed and bevacizumab were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled and received treatment. The median follow-up was 13.0 months, and the median number of treatment cycles was seven (range, one to 51). Thirty patients (60%) completed > or = six treatment cycles, and nine (18%) completed > or = 18 treatment cycles. Among the 49 patients assessable for response, the objective response rate was 55% (95% CI, 41% to 69%). Median progression-free and overall survival rates were 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 11.5 months) and 14.1 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 19.6 months), respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was modest-anemia (6%; 0), neutropenia (4%; 0), and thrombocytopenia (0; 8%). Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were proteinuria (2%; 0), venous thrombosis (4%; 2%), arterial thrombosis (2%; 0), fatigue (8%; 0), infection (8%; 2%), nephrotoxicity (2%; 0), and diverticulitis (6%; 2%). There were no grade 3 or greater hemorrhagic events or hypertension cases.

CONCLUSION

This regimen, involving a maintenance component, was associated with acceptable toxicity and relatively long survival in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. These results justify a phase III comparison against the standard-of-care in this patient population.

Translating preclinical findings of (endothelial) progenitor cell mobilization into the clinic; from bedside to bench and back

It is generally accepted that angiogenesis plays a major role in tumor growth and numerous targeting agents directed against angiogenesis pathways have been developed and approved for clinical use. In the past years the concept of angiogenesis has developed into a multi-faceted process in which, besides local activation and division of endothelial cells, bone marrow derived progenitor cells (BMDPCs) contribute to neovascularization. A multitude of preclinical and clinical data indicates that the release of BMDPCs influences the response to certain anti-cancer modalities. In this review we provide an overview of all the preclinical and clinical studies contributing to this hypothesis and translate these findings to the clinic by pointing out the clinical implications these findings might have. The recent insight in the mechanism of a systemic host response, in response to various treatment modalities has shed new light on the mechanism of tumor regrowth, early recurrence and metastasis formation during or after treatment. This provides various new targets for therapy which can be used to improve conventional chemotherapy. Furthermore it provides a potential explanation why bevacizumab selectively enhances the effectiveness of only certain types of chemotherapy.

Phase II study of the anti-insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor antibody CP-751,871 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in previously untreated, locally advanced, or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase II study of combination of the anti-insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor antibody CP-751,871 with paclitaxel and carboplatin (PCI) in advanced treatment-naïve non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), carboplatin (area under the plasma concentration-time curve of 6), and CP-751,871 10 to 20 mg/kg (PCI(10), PCI(20)) or paclitaxel and carboplatin alone (PC) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. PCI(10-20) patients could continue CP-751,871 (figitumumab) treatment after chemotherapy discontinuation. Patients treated with PC experiencing disease progression were eligible to receive CP-751,871 at investigator's discretion. An additional nonrandomized single-arm cohort of 30 patients with nonadenocarcinoma tumor histology receiving PCI(20) was enrolled on completion of the randomized study.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were enrolled onto the randomized portion of the study. Safety and efficacy information are available for 151 patients (98 patients treated with PCI and 53 patients treated with PC). Forty-eight patients treated with PCI received PCI(10) and 50 patients received PCI(20) in two sequential stages. Twenty of 53 patients treated with PC received CP-751,871 after disease progression. PCI was well tolerated. Fifty-four percent of patients treated with PCI and 42% of patients treated with PC had objective responses. Sixteen of 23 patients assessable for efficacy in the nonrandomized single-arm extension cohort also responded to treatment. Of note, 14 of 18 randomly assigned and 11 of 14 nonrandomly assigned patients treated with PCI with squamous cell carcinoma histology had response to treatment, including nine objective responses in bulky disease. Responses were also observed in two patients with squamous histology receiving CP-751,871 on PC discontinuation. PCI(20)/PC hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.8 to 0.56, according to censorship.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that PCI(20) is safe and effective in patients with NSCLC.

Proteinuria and proximal tubule lesions induced by an anti-integrin monoclonal antibody treatment: case report

Blocking integrin binding to fibronectin by a monoclonal antibody directed to integrin receptors induces apoptosis of proliferating endothelial cells. We report a case of grade 2 proteinuria, occurred fifteen days after the first administration of an anti-integrin monoclonal antibody associated to standard doses of carboplatin/paclitaxel and to a single dose of zoledronic acid in a patient treated in first line setting for a metastatic non small cell lung cancer. Kidney biopsy revealed a tubular damage probably associated to minimal change glomerulonephritis. Even if this patient did not receive any further dose of zoledronic acid, proteinuria reoccurred, although at a lower level when the investigational drug was reintroduced at the same dose. Renal function remained normal. The patient received two further cycles with lower doses, without recurrence of proteinuria. These findings suggest that this type of integrin antibody may induce transient urinary excretion of protein in a dose dependent manner without adversely affecting renal function.

[Bevacizumab and non-small cell lung cancer: a new step?]

Inhibition of specific processes essential for tumour vascular development is one of the key strategies for the treatment of non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many agents target the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) pathway, either by preventing VEGF receptor binding or inhibiting VEGF receptor signalling in endothelial cells. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody specific for VEGF-A. Combination of bevacizumab with standard first-line chemotherapy in NSCLC leads to an improvement in response rates and progression-free survival compared to chemotherapy alone and a significant survival advantage with carboplatin- paclitaxel chemotherapy. Toxicity issues are of concern with the possible occurrence of hypertension and an increased risk of arterial thrombo-embolism. The occurrence of fatal pulmonary haemorrhage after necrosis of the primary tumour is a specific toxicity in NSCLC which requires appropriate selection of patients before treatment; excluding squamous cell carcinoma, haemorrhagic tumours and tumour invasion of major blood vessels. The use of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy represent a first step in the development of antiangiogenic treatments in NSCLC, with the future possibility of using it in earlier stages of disease.

Phase III trial of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

Treatment with gemcitabine provides modest benefits in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine shows a small but significant improvement in overall survival (OS) versus gemcitabine alone. Phase II results for bevacizumab plus gemcitabine provided the rationale for a phase III trial of gemcitabine-erlotinib plus bevacizumab or placebo.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)/week), erlotinib (100 mg/day), and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine, erlotinib, and placebo in this double-blind, phase III trial. Primary end point was OS; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 301 patients were randomly assigned to the placebo group and 306 to the bevacizumab group. Median OS was 7.1 and 6.0 months in the bevacizumab and placebo arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.07; P = .2087); this difference was not statistically significant. Adding bevacizumab to gemcitabine-erlotinib significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.86; P = .0002). Treatment with bevacizumab plus gemcitabine-erlotinib was well tolerated: safety data did not differ from previously described safety profiles for individual drugs.

CONCLUSION

The primary objective was not met. The addition of bevacizumab to gemcitabine-erlotinib did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. PFS, however, was significantly longer in the bevacizumab group compared with placebo. No unexpected safety events were observed from adding bevacizumab to gemcitabine-erlotinib.

Pemetrexed in first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed is an antitumor agent traditionally used as monotherapy for the second-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of chemonaïve patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Recently, pemetrexed has been approved in combination with cisplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC other than predominantly squamous cell histology. Studies that support the development of this indication are detailed in this review. We performed a PubMed/Medline database search to identify relevant literature from 1998 until August 2008. Bibliographies from identified references were searched, as well as were abstracts from the most relevant congresses in lung cancer area (American Society of Clinical Oncology Congress, World Conferences of Lung Cancer). We detailed pemetrexed studies in the first-line setting of NSCLC treatment, in monotherapy, in combination with platinum and also, with other agents. Data regarding efficacy differences related to different histologic types were also analyzed.

New treatment strategies in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and performance status 2

Patients with performance status (PS) 2 represent approximately 30%-40% of all patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) seen in clinical practice. Although these patients have been historically excluded from randomized clinical trials, recent studies have suggested a benefit from systemic chemotherapy. The development of biologic agents offers a new promise for the treatment of PS 2 patients as a result of the perceived improved therapeutic index of these agents. However, many of the recent advances in NSCLC have been limited to good PS patients and have not translated into an improvement in the management of the PS 2 population because the studies have excluded this patient population or have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit.

Pathway targets to explore in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

With a 5-year survival rate of only 16%, improvements in therapeutic strategies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still warranted. Published prognostic gene expression classification signatures in NSCLC overlap poorly across studies. We hypothesized that different NSCLC microarray datasets will share common pathways leading to the identification of new targets for therapeutic development.

METHODS

Per gene mean expression fold change ratios were calculated from 7 publicly-available microarray datasets consisting of a total of 725 profiled samples. This was followed by mapping of differentially expression genes into functionally annotated biologic pathways using Ingenuity pathway analysis software. Common pathways containing genes whose expression levels differed between phenotypic classes defined by NSCLC cases and/or histology, pathologic stage, and gender were determined.

RESULTS

Several significant common pathways overlapping these datasets were identified in silico. One of which, Leukocyte Extravasation Signaling pathway, includes targeted agents such as imatinib, dasatinib, and temozolomide currently under exploration in NSCLC trials. The remaining pathways have targets with few drugs developed or under development in cancer therapeutics. Comparison of pathways derived from Eastern versus Western population datasets revealed several differing targets and potential target drugs.

CONCLUSION

This in silico pathway exploration in NSCLC warrants further investigation and could open the door to potential new therapeutics that might improve NSCLC patient outcomes. This strategy can be applied to other cancer types.

Recent advances of novel targeted therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths world-wide. Recent advances in cancer biology have led to the identification of new targets in neoplastic cells and the development of novel targeted therapies. At this time, two targeted agents are approved by the FDA in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib, and the anitangiogenic bevacizumab. A third agent, cetuximab, which was recently shown to enhance survival when used with cisplatin and vinorelbine as first line therapy for advanced NSCLC, will likely be approved by regulatory agencies. With more than 500 molecularly targeted agents under development, the prospects of identifying novel therapies that benefit individual patients with lung cancer are bright.

[Tumor vasculature as a therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer]

Despite developments in conventional (chemo)radiotherapy and surgery, survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains poor. Treatments with targeted molecular drugs offer novel therapeutic strategies. Bevacizumab, a recombinant anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, is the antiangiogenic drug at the most advanced stage of development in the therapy of NSCLC. However, a number of questions and future challenges relating to the use of bevacizumab in NSCLC remain. Furthermore, novel agents targeting the pre-existing NSCLC vasculature (i.e. vascular disrupting agents, VDAs) or multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors have emerged as unique drug classes delivering promising results in several preclinical and clinical studies. Herein, we review the most recent data using these novel targeted agents either alone or in combination with chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Phase I/II study of vinorelbine and exisulind as first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in patients at least 70 years old: a wisconsin oncology network study

INTRODUCTION

Exisulind is an apoptotic agent with preclinical activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Vinorelbine is safe and effective in older patients with advanced NSCLC. We assessed these agents together as palliative treatment for older patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients >/=70-years-old with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC and a performance status (PS) </=2 were eligible. Primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose (phase I) and time-to-progression (phase II) of oral exisulind with 25 mg/m/wk of intravenous vinorelbine on a 28-day cycle. Patients with clinical benefit after 6 cycles of this combination received exisulind alone.

RESULTS

Fourteen phase I patients (median PS 1; median age 78 years) were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 constipation (one patient), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (one patient) and grade 3 diarrhea (one patient). The maximum tolerated dose of oral exisulind with 25 mg/m/wk of intravenous vinorelbine was 125 mg twice daily. Thirty phase II patients (median PS 1; median age 78 years) were enrolled. Grade >/=3 neutropenia occurred in 14/30 patients. Two patients experienced neutropenic fever. There were no complete responses, one partial response and 12 patients with stable disease as their best response. The objective response rate was 4.0% (95% CI: 0.1-20.4%). Phase II median time-to-progression was 4.7 months (95% CI: 3.1-9.3 months) and median OS was 9.6 months (95% CI: 6.6-19.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This combination is safe, seems to have activity in the elderly with advanced NSCLC and a PS </=2, and warrants further investigation.

Tumor cavitation: impact on objective response evaluation in trials of angiogenesis inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We have observed cavitation of lesions in clinical trials of an angiogenesis inhibitor combined with chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesized that cavitation might alter response assessment in such clinical trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective radiologic review of patients with NSCLC enrolled onto three National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) trials of platinum-based chemotherapy with or without a small-molecule angiogenesis inhibitor (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor [VEGFRI]). Response was assessed both by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines and a novel alternate method in which the longest diameter of any cavity was subtracted from the overall longest diameter of that lesion to measure target lesions. Rates of cavitation were documented.

RESULTS

Marked cavitation of pulmonary lesions was seen in 24% of 33 patients treated with VEGFRI combined with platinum-based chemotherapy but in none of 18 patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy alone. Use of the alternate method for response assessment resulted in an alteration of response assessment, time to best response, duration of response, and time of disease progression in a minority of patients compared with RECIST.

CONCLUSION

Cavitation of target and nontarget lesions is common in NSCLC patients treated with VEGFRIs and platinum-based chemotherapy. Impact on response and time to event outcomes occurred but seems to be less common. Response assessment might be improved by incorporating cavitation into volume assessment for target lesions, potentially altering outcomes of key efficacy parameters in clinical trials. This should be prospectively assessed in clinical trials of angiogenesis inhibitors.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of motesanib in combination with gemcitabine for the treatment of patients with solid tumours

The aim of this open-label phase 1b study was to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of motesanib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumours. Eligible patients with histologically or cytologically documented solid tumours or lymphoma were enroled in three sequential, dose-escalating cohorts to receive motesanib 50 mg once daily (QD), 75 mg two times daily (BID), or 125 mg QD in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg m⁻²). The primary end point was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Twenty-six patients were enroled and received motesanib and gemcitabine. No DLTs occurred. The 75 mg BID cohort was discontinued early; therefore, 125 mg QD was the maximum target dose. Sixteen patients (62%) experienced motesanib-related adverse events, most commonly lethargy (n=6), diarrhoea (n=4), fatigue (n=3), headache (n=3), and nausea (n=3). The pharmacokinetics of motesanib and of gemcitabine were not markedly affected after combination therapy. The objective response rate was 4% (1 of 26), and 27% (7 of 26) of patients achieved stable disease. In conclusion, treatment with motesanib plus gemcitabine was well tolerated, with adverse event and pharmacokinetic profiles similar to that observed in monotherapy studies.

[Thrombo-embolic risks and bevacizumab: data from the literature and recommendations for the use of anticoagulants and antiaggregants]

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. The use of bevacizumab has shown survival benefit in variety of cancers. However, a specific toxicity profile has been observed with bevacizumab such as hypertension, proteinuria, gastrointestinal perforation and arterial thrombosis. Non-small-cell lung cancer is often associated with thrombotic event therefore guidelines are expected to prescribe bevacizumab in this population. This article presents data from literature about the thrombotic risk and provides recommendations for the use of anticoagulant and antiaggregant treatments.

Conclusions of the expert panel: importance of erlotinib as a second-line therapeutic option

During the Experts Meeting on Lung Cancer, participants emphasized the usefulness of erlotinib as second-line therapy for lung cancer. They noted that, although there are no comparative studies, erlotinib could be as effective as docetaxel and pemetrexed in second-line therapy. Regarding the toxicity profile of each of these drugs – one of the key issues considered in the meeting – specialists pointed out how important it is to clearly identify existing differences in this issue. Each drug has different degrees of toxicity, and this information is crucial at the time of choosing the therapeutic regimen. Erlotinib treatment could be an effective option for second-line therapy.

Angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Lung cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and, although some progress has been made in its treatment, the results remain poor. Better knowledge in tumour biology has allowed us to design anti-target drugs and incorporate them in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One of the most widely used targeted approaches in this type of tumour has been the inhibition of angiogenesis. Several strategies blocking the VEGF pathway, either at the ligand or recepor level, have been studied and developed. In this review, we present an up-to-date analysis of the current inhibitors of angiogenesis in the treatment of NSCLC.

Randomized phase II trial of a toll-like receptor 9 agonist oligodeoxynucleotide, PF-3512676, in combination with first-line taxane plus platinum chemotherapy for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This study assessed the efficacy of the combination of standard taxane plus platinum chemotherapy with the synthetic Toll-like receptor 9-activating oligodeoxynucleotide PF-3512676 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB to IV NSCLC were randomly assigned (one to two ratio) to receive four to six cycles of taxane/platinum chemotherapy alone or with 0.2 mg/kg of subcutaneous PF-3512676 on days 8 and 15 of each 3-week cycle. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were similar between treatment arms, although significantly more patients in the PF-3512676 arm had stage IV disease (85% compared with 62% in the chemotherapy-alone arm). The modified intent-to-treat analysis (n = 111) demonstrated a 38% ORR (confirmed and unconfirmed) in the PF-3512676 arm (n = 74) and 19% in the chemotherapy-alone arm (n = 37) by investigator evaluation. Blinded, independent radiologic review for 90 patients showed a similar trend in confirmed response rate (19% and 11%, respectively). Median survival was 12.3 months in the PF-3512676 arm and 6.8 months in the chemotherapy-alone arm, and 1-year survival was 50% and 33%, respectively. Mild to moderate local injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms were the most common PF-3512676-related adverse events, but grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were all reported more commonly for patients in the PF-3512676 arm.

CONCLUSION

The addition of PF-3512676 to taxane plus platinum chemotherapy for first-line treatment of NSCLC improves objective response and may improve survival. Confirmatory phase III trials are ongoing.

[Efficacy and tolerance of bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary report]

INTRODUCTION

Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic drug targeting VEGF. Its interest, in combination with chemotherapy, has been demonstrated in two recent trials in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and its approval is awaited within few weeks. Due its original mechanism of action, bevacizumab has a very specific safety profile and radiological response patterns.

METHOD

Based upon selected observations reported from patients included in clinical trials and on recent literature, we bring some clue for a better and safer use of bevacizumab.

RESULTS

We report toxicity associated with bevacizumab, especially vascular side-effects and unusual radiological responses.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab use in NSCLC is associated with some unexpected side effects and responses that worth to be known by pulmonologists. Selections criteria should be rigorously followed.

Phase III Study Comparing Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine With Cisplatin Plus Pemetrexed in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Advanced-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine is a standard regimen for first-line treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Phase II studies of pemetrexed plus platinum compounds have also shown activity in this setting.

Patients and Methods

This noninferiority, phase III, randomized study compared the overall survival between treatment arms using a fixed margin method (hazard ratio [HR] < 1.176) in 1,725 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m2on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2on days 1 and 8 (n = 863) or cisplatin 75 mg/m2and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2on day 1 (n = 862) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles.

Results

Overall survival for cisplatin/pemetrexed was noninferior to cisplatin/gemcitabine (median survival, 10.3 v 10.3 months, respectively; HR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.05). Overall survival was statistically superior for cisplatin/pemetrexed versus cisplatin/gemcitabine in patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 847; 12.6 v 10.9 months, respectively) and large-cell carcinoma histology (n = 153; 10.4 v 6.7 months, respectively). In contrast, in patients with squamous cell histology, there was a significant improvement in survival with cisplatin/gemcitabine versus cisplatin/pemetrexed (n = 473; 10.8 v 9.4 months, respectively). For cisplatin/pemetrexed, rates of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia (P ≤ .001); febrile neutropenia (P = .002); and alopecia (P < .001) were significantly lower, whereas grade 3 or 4 nausea (P = .004) was more common.

Conclusion

In advanced NSCLC, cisplatin/pemetrexed provides similar efficacy with better tolerability and more convenient administration than cisplatin/gemcitabine. This is the first prospective phase III study in NSCLC to show survival differences based on histologic type.