Different Medical Features and Strategies of Large Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Multi-Central Pooling Analysis

Purpose

The rectum is a rare site for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Tumors in this critical anatomical site are prone to develop local recurrence, and this occurs at a high level even in low-risk tumors. Previous studies found that high-risk was the most common category in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (RGISTs), and size was the most important factor affecting the long-term prognosis. We aimed to find out the most influential factor on clinical outcomes, and describe demographics, oncological differences, and surgical procedures in patients with poor prognosis.

Patients and Methods

Data on consecutive patients with RGIST, who were diagnosed at Peking University People’s Hospital, Shandong Province Hospital, and The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from 2010 to 2020, were retrospectively evaluated. Further, a literature search was conducted by retrieving data from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception up to March 20, 2020.

Results

In all, 50 patients were diagnosed with RGIST at three medical centers, and 86 published records were finally included in the literature review. Combined analysis of the whole individual patient data showed that 5.5 cm was deemed an appropriate cut-off value for L-RGIST, and that patients usually showed a male predominance (67.59%), younger age at onset (56.61 years), higher operative difficulty, and poorer prognosis.

Conclusion

Separation of patients with large RGIST from general patients may contribute to the recognition of the oncological characteristics and clinical management of this rare type of tumor.

Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: looking beyond the knife. An update on the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant imatinib therapy

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have traditionally been treated with surgical resection alone resulting in high rates of recurrence. However, the discovery of imatinib efficacy in GIST has revolutionized its management.

DISCUSSION

Imatinib may be used as neoadjuvant therapy with the goal of reducing tumor size, minimizing surgical morbidity and, in some cases, rendering inoperable cases operable. In addition, imatinib use in the adjuvant setting to eradicate micrometastases and prevent recurrence has shown promising results in reducing relapse rates. Appropriate patient selection and optimal dose and duration of imatinib therapy remain undecided and require further investigation. We present a literature review and a case report of our patient with a symptomatic gastric GIST managed successfully utilizing neoadjuvant imatinib therapy, laparoscopic limited resection, and adjuvant imatinib therapy.

Adjuvant treatment of GIST: patient selection and treatment strategies

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors that target the key molecular drivers of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) are effective treatments of advanced-stage GIST. Yet, most of these patients succumb to the disease. Approximately 60% of patients with GIST are cured by surgery, and these individuals can be identified by risk stratification schemes based on tumour size, mitosis count and site, and assessment of rupture. Two large randomized trials have evaluated imatinib as adjuvant treatment for operable, KIT-positive GIST; adjuvant imatinib substantially improved time to recurrence. One of these trials reported that 3 years of adjuvant imatinib improves overall survival of patients who have a high estimated risk for recurrence of GIST compared with 1 year of imatinib. The optimal adjuvant strategy remains unknown and some patients might benefit from longer than 3 years of imatinib treatment. However, a strategy that involves GIST risk assessment following surgery using a validated scheme, administration of adjuvant imatinib for 3 years, patient monitoring during and after completion of imatinib to detect recurrence early, and reinstitution of imatinib if GIST recurs is a reasonable choice for care of patients with high-risk GIST.

Advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: systemic treatment options

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), the most common sarcoma arising in the gastrointestinal tract, typically expresses the tyrosine-kinase receptor, C-KIT, and contains activating mutation in the c-kit or platelet-derived growth factor receptor (pdgfr) gene. Recently, development of small molecules that inhibit the kinase activity of mutant C-KIT and PDGFR proteins has radically changed treatment and prognosis of patients diagnosed with advanced GIST as this molecularly "targeted" therapy has demonstrated remarkable high-level of activity in this disease.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant imatinib therapy: current role in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Although surgery remains the mainstay for the treatment of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), a significant number of patients experience disease recurrence within 5 years of surgery. The emergence of imatinib therapy for the treatment of patients with advanced GIST has offered unprecedented improvements in clinical outcomes for these patients. Prospective clinical trials have supported the efficacy and safety of imatinib before and after surgical resection of GIST. The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z9001 pivotal trial revealed that 1 year of adjuvant imatinib therapy provides significantly superior recurrence-free survival in patients with GIST after surgical resection, when compared to placebo. Additional trials and case studies have also begun to define the potential clinical benefit of imatinib in the neoadjuvant setting. Optimized risk stratification paradigms will be required to ensure the appropriate selection of patients to undergo treatment with imatinib in these settings. Risk stratification schemes are evolving that potentially will include mutation status and tumor rupture, and predictive nomograms have recently been proposed. The recent European Society of Medical Oncology and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines mention use of adjuvant imatinib for ≥ 1 year in patients with KIT(+) , resectable GIST at high risk of recurrence. Moreover, the guidelines support the use of neoadjuvant imatinib in cases of limited disease if it would facilitate less extensive surgery and organ sparing. This article reviews pivotal efficacy and safety data for adjuvant imatinib and explores the potential clinical benefit of neoadjuvant imatinib in patients with GIST.

Surgical options for localized and advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

The development of imitinab has led to a revolution in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized disease. The principles to surgical treatment of GIST include careful handling of tissues to prevent tumor rupture and resection to negative margins without the need for wide excision. Minimally invasive techniques have proven equally efficacious provided appropriate oncologic resections are performed.

Downsizing treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors improved resectability

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) express the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT. Most GISTs have mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA gene, causing activation of tyrosine kinase. Imatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is the first-line palliative treatment for advanced GISTs. Sunitinib was introduced for patients with mutations not responsive to imatinib. The aim was to compare the survival of patients with high-risk resected GISTs treated with TKI prior to surgery with historical controls and to determine if organ-preserving surgery was facilitated.

METHODS

Ten high-risk GIST-patients had downsizing/adjuvant TKI treatment: nine with imatinib and one with sunitinib. The patients were matched with historical controls (n = 89) treated with surgery alone, from our population-based series (n = 259). Mutational analysis of KIT and PDGFRA was performed in all cases. The progression-free survival was calculated.

RESULTS

The primary tumors decreased in mean diameter from 20.4 cm to 10.5 cm on downsizing imatinib. Four patients with R0 resection and a period of adjuvant imatinib had no recurrences versus 67% in the historical control group. Four patients with residual liver metastases have stable disease on continuous imatinib treatment after surgery. One patient has undergone reoperation with liver resection. The downsizing treatment led to organ-preserving surgery in nine patients and improved preoperative nutritional status in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Downsizing TKI is recommended for patients with bulky tumors with invasion of adjacent organs. Sunitinib can be used for patients in case of imatinib resistance (e.g., wild-type GISTs), underlining the importance of mutational analysis for optimal surgical planning.