Therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment related peripheral neuropathies

OPINION STATEMENT

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common toxicity associated with multiple chemotherapeutic agents. CIPN may have a detrimental impact on patients' quality of life and functional ability, as well as result in chemotherapy dose reductions. Although symptoms of CIPN can improve with treatment completion, symptoms may persist. Currently, the treatment options for CIPN are quite limited. Duloxetine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has the most evidence supporting its use in the treatment of CIPN. Other agents with potential benefit for the treatment of established CIPN include gabapentinoids, venlafaxine, tricyclic antidepressants, and a topical gel consisting of the combination of amitriptyline, ketamine, and baclofen; none of these, however, has been proven to be helpful and ongoing/future studies may well show that they are not beneficial. The use of these agents is often based on their efficacy in the treatment of non-CIPN neuropathic pain, but this does not necessarily mean that they will be helpful for CIPN-related symptoms. Other nonpharmacologic interventions including acupuncture and Scrambler therapy are supported by positive preliminary data; however, further larger, placebo-controlled trial data are needed to confirm or refute their effectiveness.

Management options for established chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and debilitating condition associated with a variety of chemotherapeutic agents. Clinicians are cognizant of the negative impact of CIPN on cancer treatment outcomes and patients' psychosocial functioning and quality of life. In an attempt to alleviate this problem, clinicians and patients try various therapeutic interventions, despite limited evidence to support efficacy of these treatments. The rationale for such use is mostly based on the evidence for the treatment options in non-CIPN peripheral neuropathy syndromes, as this area is more robustly studied than is CIPN treatment. In this manuscript, we examine the existing evidence for both CIPN and non-CIPN treatments and develop a summary of the best available evidence with the aim of developing a practical approach to the treatment of CIPN, based on available literature and clinical practice experience.

Clinical trials in integrative therapies

OBJECTIVES

To review clinical trials in natural products and mind-body therapies for oncology symptom management, to discuss issues related to developing clinical trials in this area, and outline examples of rigorous and innovative study design.

DATA SOURCES

Peer reviewed literature.

CONCLUSION

Most of the evidence for the integrative therapies reviewed is derived from phase II trials, and is considered preliminary. More research is needed in these therapies to clearly articulate their role in the management of oncology symptoms. Innovative strategies and methodologies for studying integrative therapies have been demonstrated.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

It is necessary to critically evaluate the literature to be able to educate patients about integrative therapies. Investigators should expand on well-designed studies that demonstrate clinically important effects. Dissemination trials may be a good strategy, once data exists, to move integrative therapies into the care of patients.