Progress on treatment of MET signaling pathway in non-small cell lung cancer

MET activation includes gene mutation, amplification, and protein overexpression. Clinical evidence suggests that MET activation is both a primary oncogenic driver in lung cancer, and a secondary driver after acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Several small molecule TKIs have already shown to be effective in the MET pathway. However, the activation form and the diagnostic criteria of MET oncogene are still controversial, especially in patients resistant to EGFR TKIs or ALK TKIs. With the development of new MET inhibitors, a quantity of emerging trials has focused on the mechanism of acquired resistance to MET TKIs and therapeutic strategies after resistance.

Reduction in Hepatocyte Growth Factor Serum Levels is Associated with Improved Prognosis in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Afatinib: a Phase II Trial

BACKGROUND

C-met and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) have been associated with the resistance mechanism of EGFR-TKIs. HGF was evaluated as a clinical-marker of response in NSCLC patients treated with afatinib.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma and progression to any-line chemotherapy received afatinib 40 mg/day. Mutational EGFR and HER2 status were assessed by RT-PCR. HER2 amplification was evaluated by FISH. Serum HGF content was measured by ELISA before and 2 months after the start of treatment. HGF levels were assessed with the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free-survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01542437.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (75 %) were EGFR mutation positive. Response was achieved in 59 % of all patients and 78 % of EGFR mutated patients. Median PFS was 10 [95 % CI 6.8-13.1] and 14.5 months [10.9-18.9] for all and EGFR mutated patients, respectively. Median OS was 22.8 [17.5-28.1] and 32.4 months [18.3-46.6] for all and EGFR mutated patients, respectively. Patients with reduced serum HGF levels had improved ORR (75 % vs 44 %; p = 0.011), PFS (15.1 [2.9-27.3] vs 6.5 months [3.9-9.1]; p = 0.005) and OS (NR vs 14.5 months [7.8 - 21.3] p = 0.007). A reduction in serum HGF levels was an independent factor associated with longer PFS (HR 0.40; p = 0.021) and OS (HR 0.31; p = 0.006) in all and EGFR mutated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A reduction in serum HGF levels was associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with afatinib. These results suggest HGF might have a role as a mechanism of resistance to EGFR-TKIs. HGF could represent a potential therapeutic target to prevent or reverse resistance particularly in EGFR mutated patients.

A Randomized Phase 2 Study Comparing the Combination of Ficlatuzumab and Gefitinib with Gefitinib Alone in Asian Patients with Advanced Stage Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

A randomized phase 2 study was designed to compare the combination of ficlatuzumab (AV-299), a humanized hepatocyte growth factor-neutralizing monoclonal antibody, plus gefitinib versus gefitinib monotherapy in a pulmonary adenocarcinoma population clinically enriched for EFGR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing mutations.

METHODS

A total of 188 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either gefitinib or ficlatuzumab plus gefitinib treatment. Patients who demonstrated disease control in the single-agent gefitinib arm were allowed to cross over to ficlatuzumab plus gefitinib treatment upon disease progression. Molecular analyses included tumor EGFR mutation status and retrospective proteomic testing using VeriStrat, a multivariate test based on mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib did not provide significant improvement over gefitinib monotherapy for the primary end point of overall response rate or the secondary end points of progression-free survival and overall survival. In the subgroup classified as VeriStrat poor, the addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib showed significant improvement in both progression-free survival and overall survival in both the intent-to-treat population and the subgroup with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitizing mutations. For all patients, the most frequent adverse events were diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and paronychia.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the trial showed no significant benefit from the addition of ficlatuzumab to gefitinib in the overall population of Asian patients with advanced-stage pulmonary adenocarcinoma, the biomarker data suggest that patients classified as VeriStrat poor may benefit from ficlatuzumab combination therapy.

Phase I ficlatuzumab monotherapy or with erlotinib for refractory advanced solid tumours and multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Ficlatuzumab, a humanised hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) IgG1κ inhibitory monoclonal antibody, was evaluated for recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PKs), antidrug antibody (ADA), pharmacodynamics (PDs) and antitumour activity as monotherapy or combined with erlotinib.

METHODS

Patients with solid tumours received ficlatuzumab 2, 5, 10 or 20 mg kg(-1) intravenously every 2 weeks (q2w). Additional patients were treated at the RP2D erlotinib.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients enrolled at doses ⩽20 mg kg(-1). Common adverse events (AEs) included peripheral oedema, fatigue and nausea. Three patients experienced grade ⩾3 treatment-related hyperkalaemia/hypokalaemia, diarrhoea or fatigue. Best overall response (44%) was stable disease (SD); median duration was 5.5 months (0.4-18.7 months). One patient has been on therapy with SD for >4 years. Pharmacokinetics of ficlatuzumab showed low clearance (0.17-0.26 ml h(-1) kg(-1)), a half-life of 6.8-9.4 days and dose-proportional exposure. Ficlatuzumab/erlotinib had no impact on the PK of either agent. No ADAs were detected. Ficlatuzumab increased serum HGF levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommended phase II dose is 20 mg kg(-1) q2w for ficlatuzumab monotherapy or with erlotinib. Preliminary antitumour activity and manageable AEs were observed. Pharmacokinetics were dose-proportional and consistent with other IgG therapeutics. Ficlatuzumab was not immunogenic, and serum HGF was a potential PD marker.

Monoclonal antibodies as therapeutics in human malignancies

ABSTRACT: 

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a proven effective therapeutic modality in human malignancy. Several mAbs are approved to targets critical in aberrant oncogenic signaling within tumors and their microenvironment. These targets include secreted ligands (e.g., VEGF and HGH), their receptors (e.g., HER2 and VEGFR2), cell surface counter receptors and their receptor-bound ligands (e.g., PD1 and PD1L, respectively). The ability to genetically engineer the structure and/or functions of mAbs has significantly improved their effectiveness. Furthermore, advances in gene expression profiling, proteomics, deep sequencing and deciphering of complex signaling networks have revealed novel therapeutic targets. We review target selection, approved indications and the rationale for mAb utilization in solid and hematologic malignancies. We also discuss novel mAbs in early- and late-phase clinical trials that are likely to change the natural history of disease and improve survival. The future challenge is to design mAb-based novel trial designs for diagnostics and therapeutics for human malignancies.

The role of MET receptor tyrosine kinase in non-small cell lung cancer and clinical development of targeted anti-MET agents

A better understanding of the pathophysiology and evolution of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has identified a number of molecular targets and spurred development of novel targeted therapeutic agents. The MET receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are implicated in tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis in a broad spectrum of human cancers, including NSCLC. Amplification of MET has been reported in approximately 5%-22% of lung tumors with acquired resistance to small-molecule inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Resistance to EGFR inhibitors is likely mediated through downstream activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase /AKT pathway. Simultaneous treatment of resistant tumors with a MET inhibitor plus an EGFR inhibitor can abrogate activation of downstream effectors of cell growth, proliferation, and survival, thereby overcoming acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Development and preclinical testing of multiple agents targeting the HGF-MET pathway, including monoclonal antibodies targeting HGF or the MET receptor and small-molecule inhibitors of the MET tyrosine kinase, have confirmed the crucial role of this pathway in NSCLC. Several agents are now in phase III clinical development for the treatment of NSCLC. This review summarizes the role of MET in the pathophysiology of NSCLC and in acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors and provides an update on progress in the clinical development of inhibitors of MET for treatment of NSCLC.

Seminars in clinical pharmacology: an introduction to MET inhibitors for the medical oncologist

MET is a tyrosine kinase receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), primarily expressed on epithelial cells; the activation of MET induces several biological responses relevant for the development and growth of many human cancers. Several human malignancies present altered expression of MET and this is usually associated with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype. The majority of MET inhibitors in clinical development target directly the receptor through the use of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) or through small molecule inhibitors of MET kinase activity; small molecule inhibitors are very potent but less specific than MAbs. MET inhibitors are of great clinical interest because of the extensive crosstalk of the HGF/MET axis with many other signaling pathways, including growth factor-dependent pathways (like PI3K/AKT/mTOR,RAS/RAF/ERK) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) axis. In preclinical studies, the treatment with MET inhibitors could prevent or reverse resistance to inhibitors of growth factor-dependent signaling; this hypothesis is currently tested in phase III trials with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Based on preclinical and preliminary clinical results, a rational strategy for the clinical development of MET antagonists should include a selection of the tumors with MET overexpression, the identification of prognostic/predictive biomarkers, the evaluation of combinations with anti-VEGF compounds.

MET: a promising anticancer therapeutic target

The MET pathway is dysregulated in many human cancers and promotes tumour growth, invasion and dissemination. Abnormalities in MET signalling have been reported to correlate with poor clinical outcomes and drug resistance in patients with cancer. Thus, MET has emerged as an attractive target for cancer therapy. Several MET inhibitors have been introduced into the clinic, and are currently in all phases of clinical trials. In general, initial results from these studies indicate only a modest benefit in unselected populations. In this Review, we discuss current challenges in developing MET inhibitors--including identification of predictive biomarkers--as well as the most-efficient ways to combine these drugs with other targeted agents or with classic chemotherapy or radiotherapy.