1
|
Alam W, Bouferraa Y, Haibe Y, Mukherji D, Shamseddine A. Management of colorectal cancer in the era of COVID-19: Challenges and suggestions. Sci Prog 2021; 104:368504211010626. [PMID: 33878982 PMCID: PMC10358474 DOI: 10.1177/00368504211010626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic had a huge impact on all sectors around the world. In particular, the healthcare system has been subject to an enormous pressure that has surpassed its ability in many instances. Additionally, the pandemic has called for a review of our daily medical practices, including our approach to colorectal cancer management where treatment puts patients at high risk of virus exposure. Given their higher median age, patients are at an increased risk for severe symptoms and complications in cases of infection, especially in the setting of immunosuppression. Therefore, a review of the routine colorectal cancer practices is needed to minimize risk of exposure. Oncologists should weigh risk of exposure versus the patient's oncologic benefits when approaching management. In addition, treatment protocols should be modified to minimize hospital visits and admissions while maintaining the same treatment efficacy. In this review, we will focus on challenges that colorectal cancer patients face during the pandemic, while highlighting the priority in each case. We will also discuss the evidence for potential modifications to existing treatment plans that could reduce infectious exposure without compromising care. Finally, we will discuss the impact of the socio-economic difficulties faced by Lebanese patients due to a poor economy toppled by an unexpected pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walid Alam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Youssef Bouferraa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Yolla Haibe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Deborah Mukherji
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ali Shamseddine
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fu HT, Xu YY, Tian JJ, Fu JX, Nie SL, Tang YY, Chen P, Zong L. Long-term efficacy of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin chemotherapy on stage III colon cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2020; 8:27-40. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v8.i1.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many clinical studies for the long-term survival or efficacy of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) in colon cancer have already been studied, but its clinical benefit is controversial.
AIM To evaluate the long-term efficacy of XELOX regimen in comparison with other adjuvant chemotherapy protocols in colon cancer.
METHODS By searching the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, a total of 12 randomized controlled trials involving 6698 stage III colon cancer cases (XELOX protocol: n = 3298 cases; other adjuvant chemotherapy protocol: n = 3268 cases) were included. The parameter outcomes included the overall survival and the disease-free survival. The quality control of selected literature was based on the Jadad scale and the GRADE system.
RESULTS In comparison to other adjuvant chemotherapy regimen, XELOX regimen showed a better overall survival (odds ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-1.44, P < 0.0001) and a better disease-free survival (odds ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-1.46, P < 0.0001) for colon cancer patients, suggesting the XELOX regimen can be a good option for postoperative treatment of stage III colon cancer.
CONCLUSION The XELOX regimen can be a preferred option for adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong-Tao Fu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of South China, Hengyang 421000, Hunan Province, China
| | - Ying-Ying Xu
- Department of General Surgery, Yizheng People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jing-Jing Tian
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, Hunan Province, China
| | - Jia-Xin Fu
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Shao-Ling Nie
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan Province, China
| | - Yan-Yan Tang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410000, Hunan Province, China
| | - Ping Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Liang Zong
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Phase III randomised trial comparing 6 vs. 12-month of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer: final results of the JFMC37-0801 study. Br J Cancer 2019; 120:689-696. [PMID: 30833647 PMCID: PMC6461756 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0410-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Up to 6-months oxaliplatin-containing regimen is now widely accepted as a standard adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, oral fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is used for some part of patients, especially in Asian countries including Japan, and its optimal duration is yet to be fully investigated. Methods A total of 1306 patients with curatively-resected stage III CRC were randomly assigned to receive capecitabine (2500 mg/m2/day) for 14 out of 21 days for 6 (n = 654) or 12 (n = 650) months. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results The 3- and 5-year DFS were 70.0% and 65.3% in the 6M group and 75.3% and 68.7% in the 12M group, respectively (p = 0.0549, HR = 0.858, 90% CI: 0.732–1.004). The 5-year RFS was 69.3% and 74.1% in the 6M and 12M groups, respectively (p = 0.0143, HR = 0.796, 90% CI: 0.670–0.945). The 5-year OS was 83.2% and 87.6%, respectively (p = 0.0124, HR = 0.727, 90% CI: 0.575–0.919). The incidence of overall grade 3–4 adverse events was almost comparable in both groups. Conclusions Although 12-month adjuvant capecitabine did not demonstrate superior DFS to that of 6-month, the observed better RFS and OS in the 12-month treatment period could be of value in selected cases.
Collapse
|
4
|
Meyers BM, Cosby R, Quereshy F, Jonker D. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer Following Complete Resection: A Cancer Care Ontario Systematic Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:459-465. [PMID: 28341242 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2016] [Revised: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review was to provide current evidence regarding the use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer following curative intent surgery. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and proceedings of American Society for Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology/European Cancer Congress were searched through to August 2015. Systematic reviews (with or without meta-analyses) and randomised controlled trials were included. Patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer have an overall survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Combination chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin or capecitabine/oxaliplatin) provides a larger benefit than monotherapy but with additional toxicity. For stage II colon cancer, a clear overall survival benefit has not been shown. However, based on the subgroup analysis available, patients with high-risk stage II disease may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients younger than 70 years of age may derive greater disease-free survival and overall survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (in combination with oxaliplatin) compared with those older than 70 years. Stage II patients with microsatellite instability may have an overall survival detriment if given adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B M Meyers
- Juravinski Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - R Cosby
- Program in Evidence-Based Care, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Campus, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - F Quereshy
- Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Jonker
- Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
André T, Iveson T, Labianca R, Meyerhardt JA, Souglakos I, Yoshino T, Paul J, Sobrero A, Taieb J, Shields AF, Ohtsu A, Grothey A, Sargent DJ. The IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy) Collaboration: Prospective Combined Analysis of Phase III Trials Investigating Duration of Adjuvant Therapy with the FOLFOX (FOLFOX4 or Modified FOLFOX6) or XELOX (3 versus 6 months) Regimen for Patients with Stage III Colon Cancer: Trial Design and Current Status. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2013; 9:261-269. [PMID: 24032000 PMCID: PMC3766516 DOI: 10.1007/s11888-013-0181-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) collaboration was established to prospectively combine and analyze data from several randomized trials conducted around the world to answer whether a three-month course of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy (FOLFOX4/modified FOLFOX6 or XELOX) is non-inferior to the current standard six-month treatment for patients with stage III colon cancer, with a primary endpoint of three years disease-free survival. The IDEA steering committee comprises two members from each group coordinating an individual trial and two members from a secretariat who coordinate combining of the data and management of the joint analysis. Members of the IDEA agreed to combine the data from their individual trials to enable definitive analysis consisting of at least 10,500 patients. With accrual of 8,797 patients at the end of February 2013, the IDEA is on track to achieve its accrual objective of at least 10,500 patients by the end of 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, and Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC), Paris, France
| | - Timothy Iveson
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Ioannis Souglakos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - James Paul
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CTU), Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Julien Taieb
- Digestive oncology department, European hospital Georges-Pompidou, and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Anthony F. Shields
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI USA
| | - Atsushi Ohtsu
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CTU), Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - for the IDEA Steering Committee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, and Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC), Paris, France
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Oncology Unit, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CTU), Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
- Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Digestive oncology department, European hospital Georges-Pompidou, and Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| |
Collapse
|