Immunotherapy in metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma: A single institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) were recently approved in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and could be a promising option for metastatic RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation (sRCC) which otherwise carry a poor prognosis. We sought to compare outcomes between patients who received immunotherapy (IO) including CPIs or high dose interleukin-2 (HD IL2) for metastatic sRCC versus those who did not.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective data analysis of 44 consecutive sRCC patients with any percentage of sarcomatoid differentiation from our institutional RCC database of whom 34 received IO and 10 patients did not.

RESULTS

Baseline variables between the two groups were not significantly different except for a greater percentage of patients with ≥40% sarcomatoid differentiation in the non-IO cohort. At a median follow-up of 27.6 months, patients treated with IO had a median overall survival of 57.6 months compared to 6.6 months in patients not treated with IO (p = 0.0002). Overall response rates (ORR) between the IO and non-IO group were 35.3% and 0% respectively (p = 0.06). When IO was given in the 1st line setting, the ORR was 25.0%, as compared to 44.4% in the 2nd line setting and beyond though limitations of small sample sizes apply. Immune-related adverse events (IRAE) occurred in 38.2% of patients in the IO group, with grade 3 events (mostly gastrointestinal) in 20.6% with no grade 4 or 5 events. IRAEs led to interruption or discontinuation of immunotherapy in 26.5%.

CONCLUSION

Our results support IO as an effective therapeutic option for patients with metastatic sarcomatoid RCC. Further study of various IO regimens, including those affecting the interleukin-2 signaling pathway, and their efficacy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings are warranted in sRCC.

Metastatic sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sarcomatoid component carries a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been approved for the treatment of metastatic RCC, but their efficacy in patients with sarcomatoid component is not known. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 30 consecutive patients at our center who were treated for metastatic RCC with sarcomatoid component. Results: Ten patients were treated with CPI group while 20 patients were in No-CPI group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, race, and stage at diagnosis between the two groups. After a median follow-up of 35 months, 3 of 10 patients in CPI arm and 5 of 20 patients in No-CPI group were alive. The median overall survival was 33.8 m in immunotherapy group compared to 8.8 m in nonimmunotherapy group (p = .001). Discussion: In our experience, CPI therapy resulted in better outcomes compared to traditional therapy with molecular-targeted agents or chemotherapy in these patients.

High-dose interleukin 2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid features

Background

High-dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) is used in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and has an overall response rate (ORR) of 12–20% and a complete response rate (CR) of 8% in unselected populations with predominantly clear cell type renal cell carcinoma. Nearly 10–15% of patients with renal cell carcinoma exhibit sarcomatoid differentiation, a feature which correlates with a median overall survival (OS) of 9 months and overall poor prognosis. We report a single institution experience with 21 patients with mRCC with sarcomatoid features post-nephrectomy who were treated with HD IL-2.

Methods

Twenty one patients with mRCC with sarcomatoid features post-nephrectomy who underwent therapy with HD IL-2 were identified at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 2004 to 2016. Baseline patient characteristics, HD IL-2 cycles, time to progression, and subsequent therapies were evaluated. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in the cohort were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Disease characteristics were evaluated for significance using the Fischer′s exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results

Patients were predominantly Caucasian males with a median age of 54 years. A majority, 86% of these patients, had metastatic disease at time of initial presentation, primarily with lung and lymph node involvement. The ORR and CR with HD IL-2 was 10% and 5%, respectively. Initial localized disease presentation is the only variable that was significantly associated with response to HD IL-2 (p = 0.0158). Number of HD IL-2 doses did not correlate with response with a mean of 16.5 and 15.0 total doses in responders and non-responders, respectively (p = 0.53). Median PFS with HD IL-2 was 7.9 months (95% CI, 5.0–21.3). Median OS was 30.5 months (95% CI 13.3–57.66). Within the subset of patients who had progression on IL-2, median OS was 19.4 months (95% CI, 13.3–35.3). In patients who received second-line therapy, median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI 2.4–10.2).

Conclusion

In patients with mRCC with sarcomatoid features, use of HD IL-2 was associated with a modest ORR and a higher survival compared to historical controls (patients with mRCC and sarcomatoid features). Thus, HD IL-2 may have a role in treating selected patients with mRCC with sarcomatoid features.

Surgical management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the era of targeted therapies

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been considered standard management for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) for over a decade. This practice, based on evidence from the immunotherapy era, has now come into question with the dramatic shift in management of mRCC patients due to the development and approval of several targeted molecular therapies (TMT).

METHODS

A comprehensive English language literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed to identify articles and guidelines pertinent to CN in mRCC.

RESULTS

Retrospective studies have demonstrated improved survival for patients who underwent CN compared to those that did not; however, these studies suffer from heavy selection bias. Furthermore, the optimal timing of TMT, before or after surgery is not known. Pre-surgical TMT has the advantage of early treatment of metastases, downsizing of the primary, and may be an effective 'litmus test' for the selection of patients for CN based on response to TMT. The results of two ongoing phase III trials (CARMENA and SURTIME) will address much of the controversy on the role of CN and the timing of systemic therapy in the TMT era. In this review, we aim to present the evidence that lead to adoption of CN in the era of immunotherapies as well as the available data about the oncologic benefit of CN in patients with mRCC who receive TMT as their primary systemic therapy.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be an important role for CN in the era of TMT, mostly in patients with favorable risk and where a high percentage of tumor burden can be removed by cytoreductive surgery.