The Long-HER study: clinical and molecular analysis of patients with HER2+ advanced breast cancer who become long-term survivors with trastuzumab-based therapy

Background

Trastuzumab improves survival outcomes in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. The Long-Her study was designed to identify clinical and molecular markers that could differentiate long-term survivors from patients having early progression after trastuzumab treatment.

Methods

Data were collected from women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab that experienced a response or stable disease during at least 3 years. Patients having a progression in the first year of therapy with trastuzumab were used as a control. Genes related with trastuzumab resistance were identified and investigated for network and gene functional interrelation. Models predicting poor response to trastuzumab were constructed and evaluated. Finally, a mutational status analysis of selected genes was performed in HER2 positive breast cancer samples.

Results

103 patients were registered in the Long-HER study, of whom 71 had obtained a durable complete response. Median age was 58 years. Metastatic disease was diagnosed after a median of 24.7 months since primary diagnosis. Metastases were present in the liver (25%), lungs (25%), bones (23%) and soft tissues (23%), with 20% of patients having multiple locations of metastases. Median duration of response was 55 months. The molecular analysis included 35 patients from the group with complete response and 18 patients in a control poor-response group. Absence of trastuzumab as part of adjuvant therapy was the only clinical factor associated with long-term survival. Gene ontology analysis demonstrated that PI3K pathway was associated with poor response to trastuzumab-based therapy: tumours in the control group usually had four or five alterations in this pathway, whereas tumours in the Long-HER group had two alterations at most.

Conclusions

Trastuzumab may provide a substantial long-term survival benefit in a selected group of patients. Whole genome expression analysis comparing long-term survivors vs. a control group predicted early progression after trastuzumab-based therapy. Multiple alterations in genes related to the PI3K-mTOR pathway seem to be required to confer resistance to this therapy.

Advances and future directions in the targeting of HER2-positive breast cancer: implications for the future

OPINION STATEMENT

The natural history of HER2-positive breast cancer significantly changed in the past 15 years. Form being the most aggressive type of breast cancer, it became treatable with important cure rates. However, with new and successful drugs, resistance emerges. Progress in research and drug development continues to make available effective anti-HER2 therapies. Our challenge today is to use these tools correctly by looking at the data that support the indications of each compound and to continue clinical trial participation.

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in breast cancer: targets, trials and biomarkers

The phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is a complicated intracellular pathway, which leads to cell growth and tumor proliferation and plays a significant role in endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Multiple compounds targeting this pathway are being evaluated in clinical trials. These agents are generally well tolerated and can be used in combination with targeted therapies, endocrine therapy or cytotoxic agents. The identification of subtypes of tumors more likely to respond to these therapeutics cannot be overemphasized, since breast cancer is a very heterogeneous malignancy. Activation of pathways such as KRAS and MEK can act as escape mechanisms that lead to resistance, thus a combination of agents targeting multiple steps of the intracellular machinery is promising. There is evidence that tumors with PIK3CA mutations are more sensitive to inhibitors of the PI3K pathway but this has yet to be validated. Large clinical trials with correlative studies are necessary to identify reliable biomarkers of efficacy.

Therapeutic Considerations in Treating HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Despite advances in detection and treatment, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains the second highest cause of cancer-related death for women in the United States. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is amplified in 25-30% of breast cancers and is associated with aggressive disease and, historically, with poorer outcomes. The advent of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody to HER2, revolutionized the management of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) in the metastatic and adjuvant settings. However, relapse despite adjuvant trastuzumab and resistance to trastuzumab in the metastatic setting remain substantial clinical problems for many patients with HER2-positive BC. As such, analyzing the mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance and developing new therapy to overcome trastuzumab resistance are research priorities. There has been progress, with the approval of three additional HER2-targeted agents in the last six years: lapatinib, pertuzumab, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). Other HER2-targeted therapies, including neratinib and afatinib, are in clinical development, and trials of novel agents such as heat shock protein-90 (HSP90) inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, and HER2-targeted vaccines are ongoing. In addition to developing new therapy, research is addressing several unique challenges in the management of HER2-positive MBC. In this article, we discuss advances in the treatment of HER2-positive MBC, with a focus on novel HER2-targeted therapy and HER2-targeted agents recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Additionally, we also address the management of brain metastases (BM) and hormone receptor (HR) - positive, HER2-positive MBC.

New HER2-positive targeting agents in clinical practice

Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor occurs in approximately 20-25 % of invasive breast cancers. This subtype of breast cancer has been associated with poor clinical outcomes. The development of trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the extracellular domain of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), revolutionized outcomes of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer; however, many patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer eventually become resistant to it. Several newer anti-HER2 agents have been developed, including lapatinib, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab emtansine. These exciting advances in drug development for HER2-positive breast cancer have also led to many challenges, including how to optimally sequence and combine HER2-targeted agents.

Optimal sequencing of anti-HER2 therapy throughout the continuum of HER2-positive breast cancer: evidence and clinical considerations

With the advent of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab over 2 decades ago for breast cancer therapy, the outcome of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2-positive disease has improved dramatically. Based on its substantial efficacy and good tolerability, trastuzumab has become the therapeutic gold standard for early as well as advanced breast cancer. Nevertheless, despite adjuvant trastuzumab, patients do experience recurrence and require further anti-HER2-targeted therapy. Next to the small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib, which was the first approved therapy option after trastuzumab failure, several new anti-HER2 agents are currently already available for clinical use [i.e. pertuzumab, T-DM1 (trastuzumab emtansine)] or are still being evaluated (e.g. afatinib, neratinib). Recent evidence from neoadjuvant as well as metastatic therapy suggests that dual blockade may be superior to single-agent HER2 blockade. While the number of available or potential therapies has increased considerably, no additional predictive biomarkers beyond HER2 have been validated for the use of the different anti-HER2 therapies. Moreover, novel therapeutic concepts such as the antibody-drug conjugate T-DM1 warrant excellent determination methodology for HER2 and suggest re-evaluation of tumor biology upon first metastasis. The clinical challenge remains to optimally choose, utilize, and sequence anti-HER2 therapy in early as well as metastatic breast cancer. This article will provide evidence-based guidance for sequencing anti-HER2 therapy throughout the continuum of breast cancer therapy.

Picking the point of inhibition: a comparative review of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors

The frequent activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in cancer, and its crucial role in cell growth and survival, has made it a much desired target for pharmacologic intervention. Following the regulatory approval of the rapamycin analogs everolimus and temsirolimus, recent years have seen an explosion in the number of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibitors under clinical investigation. These include: ATP-competitive, dual inhibitors of class I PI3K and mTORC1/2; "pan-PI3K" inhibitors, which inhibit all four isoforms of class I PI3K (α, β, δ, γ); isoform-specific inhibitors of the various PI3K isoforms; allosteric and catalytic inhibitors of AKT; and ATP-competitive inhibitors of mTOR only (and thus mTORC1 and mTORC2). With so many agents in development, clinicians are currently faced with a wide array of clinical trials investigating a multitude of inhibitors with different mechanisms of action, being used both as single agents and in combination with other therapies. Here, we provide a review of the literature, with the aim of differentiating the genomic contexts in which these various types of inhibitors may potentially have superior activity.

Genome-based approaches for the diagnosis of breast cancer: a review with perspective

SUMMARY Despite progress with microarray-based gene expression profiling of multiple genes concurrently, solid biomarkers or molecular classification have not been established as a result of Phase III randomized trials. Conventional clinicopathological characteristics and single-gene defect-based molecular tools based on the old dogma of reductionist approaches and linear experimentation that have created our knowledge in biology over the past century, and still today represent the basis for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all diseases in clinical medicine, are saving the lives of tens of thousands of patients with breast cancer. Almost 5000 manuscripts have been published on next-generation technologies in MEDLINE in the last 3 years, with 100 of them regarding breast cancer. This review considers evidence published after 2010 and up until October 2013 of the latest studies published using high-throughput next-generation techniques in significant numbers of samples from patients with breast cancer and data from trials enrolled on ClinicalTrials.gov website. A perspective estimation of the potential and challenges of modern approaches are also explained in detail.

The emergence of targeted drugs in breast cancer to prevent resistance to endocrine treatment and chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Deregulated signaling pathways are associated with resistance to chemotherapy and endocrine treatment, providing a rationale for the implementation of novel targeted therapies in breast cancer therapy. Key molecules targeted therapeutically in ongoing clinical breast cancer trials are phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), Src, insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor, heat shock protein-90, histone deacetylases, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), Notch and human epidermal growth factor receptors (HERs).

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of novel targeted agents currently explored in clinical breast cancer trials and registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. The main focus will be on their ability to prevent or reverse endocrine resistance and chemoresistance in breast cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

HER2 targeted agents have extended survival substantially, both in the adjuvant and metastatic setting, pointing to a crucial dependency on this pathway in HER2-amplified breast cancer, including drug resistance reversal. While data on mTOR inhibitors are encouraging and preliminary results on CDK4/6 and Src inhibitors exciting, so far other targeted agents have been of limited benefit when added in concert with conventional therapies. Future clinical trials should systematically explore biomarkers and defects in functional gene cascades to identify relevant biological mechanisms to be targeted therapeutically in breast cancer.

Clinical development of mTOR inhibitors in breast cancer

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is a central pathway that regulates mRNA translation, protein synthesis, glucose metabolism, lipid synthesis and autophagy, and is involved in malignant transformation. Several randomized trials have shown that the use of mTOR inhibitors could improve patient outcome with hormone receptor-positive or human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive breast cancer. This review analyzes new perspectives from these trials. Preclinical studies have suggested that the mTOR pathway may play a role in the resistance to hormone therapy, trastuzumab and chemotherapy for breast cancer. This concept has been tested in clinical trials for neoadjuvant treatment and for metastatic breast cancer patients. Also, much effort has gone into the identification of biomarkers that will allow for more precise stratification of patients. Findings from these studies will provide indispensable tools for the design of future clinical trials and identify new perspectives and challenges for researchers and clinicians.

PI3K pathway inhibitors for the treatment of brain metastases with a focus on HER2+ breast cancer

The incidence of breast cancer brain metastases has increased in recent years, largely due to improved control of systemic disease with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted agents and the inability of most of these agents to efficiently cross the blood-blood barrier (BBB) and control central nervous system disease. There is, therefore, an urgent unmet need for treatments to prevent and treat HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs). Aberrant activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is frequently observed in many cancers, including primary breast tumors and BCBMs. Agents targeting key components of this pathway have demonstrated antitumor activity in diverse cancers, and may represent a new treatment strategy for BCBMs. In preclinical studies, several inhibitors of PI3K and mTOR have demonstrated an ability to penetrate the BBB and down-regulate PI3K signaling, indicating that these agents may be potential therapies for brain metastatic disease. The PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (BKM120) and the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) are currently under evaluation in combination with trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ BCBMs.

Which patients with metastatic breast cancer benefit from subsequent lines of treatment? An update for clinicians

The outcome of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has clearly improved over the past decades and the proportion of women living with their disease for several years is increasing. However, the usefulness of multiple lines of treatment is still debated and under evaluation. The available data from both randomized trials and large retrospective series are reviewed and discussed in order to analyze management practices, with emphasis on potential prognostic and predictive factors for clinical outcome. At present, evidence-based medicine provides some support for the use of second-line and to a lesser degree and in selected cases, third-line chemotherapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative MBC. Beyond third-line treatment, messages from recently reported retrospective studies also suggest a clear potential gain for women receiving further therapies after disease progression, since each line can contribute to a longer survival. In HER2-positive disease, the data from observational and retrospective studies support a clinical benefit from the use of trastuzumab beyond disease progression and emerging evidences from randomized controlled trials are leading to the introduction of newer HER2-targeted therapies in multiple lines. The question 'How many lines of treatment should we give patients?' clearly needs further research through prospective, high-quality clinical trials, aiming for a better definition of factors with prognostic and predictive role. In the meantime, the 'optimal' treatment strategy should probably be to use as many therapeutic options as possible, either in sequence or combination, to keep the best efficacy/toxicity balance, considering MBC as a chronic disease.

A phase 2 study of everolimus combined with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in patients with HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer that progressed during prior trastuzumab and taxane therapy

Increased activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is a common factor in putative mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance, resulting in dysregulation of cell migration, growth, proliferation, and survival. Data from preclinical and phase 1/2 clinical studies suggest that adding everolimus (an oral mTOR inhibitor) to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy may enhance the efficacy of, and restore sensitivity to, trastuzumab-based therapy. In this phase 2 multicenter study, adult patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer resistant to trastuzumab and pretreated with a taxane received everolimus 10 mg/day in combination with paclitaxel (80 mg/m² days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks) and trastuzumab (4 mg/kg loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg weekly), administered in 28-day cycles. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Fifty-five patients were enrolled; one remained on study treatment at the time of data cutoff. The median number of prior chemotherapy lines for advanced disease was 3.5 (range 1–11). The ORR was 21.8 %, the clinical benefit rate was 36.4 %, the median PFS estimate was 5.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 4.99–7.69 months), and the median OS estimate was 18.1 months (95 % CI: 12.85–24.11 months). Hematologic grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (25.5 % grade 3, 3.6 % grade 4), anemia (7.3 % grade 3), and thrombocytopenia (5.5 % grade 3, 1.8 % grade 4). Nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs included stomatitis (20.0 %), diarrhea (5.5 %), vomiting (5.5 %), fatigue (5.5 %), and pneumonia (5.5 %), all grade 3. These findings suggest that the combination of everolimus plus trastuzumab and paclitaxel is feasible, with promising activity in patients with highly resistant HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. This combination is currently under investigation in the BOLERO-1 phase 3 trial.