Cancer Vaccines for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the subtype of breast cancer with the poorest outcomes, and is associated with a high risk of relapse and metastasis. The treatment choices for this malignancy have been confined to conventional chemotherapeutic agents, due to a lack of expression of the canonical molecular targets. Immunotherapy has been recently changing the treatment paradigm for many types of tumors, and the approach of evoking active immune responses in the milieu of breast tumors through cancer vaccines has been introduced as one of the most novel immunotherapeutic approaches. Accordingly, a number of vaccines for the treatment or prevention of recurrence have been developed and are currently being studied in TNBC patients, while none have yet received any approvals. To elucidate the efficacy and safety of these vaccines, we performed a systematic review of the available literature on the topic. After searching the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases, a total of 5701 results were obtained, from which 42 clinical studies were eventually included based on the predefined criteria. The overall quality of the included studies was acceptable. However, due to a lack of reporting outcomes of survival or progression in some studies (which were presented as conference abstracts) as well as the heterogeneity of the reported outcomes and study designs, we were not able to carry out a meta-analysis. A total of 32 different vaccines have so far been evaluated in TNBC patients, with the majority belonging to the peptide-based vaccine type. The other vaccines were in the cell or nucleic acid (RNA/DNA)-based categories. Most vaccines proved to be safe with low-grade, local adverse events and could efficiently evoke cellular immune responses; however, most trials were not able to demonstrate significant improvements in clinical indices of efficacy. This is in part due to the limited number of randomized studies, as well as the limited TNBC population of each trial. However, due to the encouraging results of the currently published trials, we anticipate that this strategy could show its potential through larger, phase III randomized studies in the near future.

Inhibition of triple negative breast cancer metastasis and invasiveness by novel drugs that target epithelial to mesenchymal transition

Invasive breast cancer (BrCa) is predicted to affect 1 in 9 women in a lifetime;1 in 32 will die from this disease. The most aggressive forms of BrCa, basal-like/triple-negative phenotype (TNBC), are challenging to treat and result in higher mortality due high number of metastatic cases. There is a paucity of options for TNBC treatment, which highlights the need for additional innovative treatment approaches. NIH-III mice were injected in the abdominal mammary fat pad with luciferase-expressing derivative of the human TNBC cell line, MDA-MB-231 cells. Animals were gavage-fed with nitrofen at the doses of 1, 3 or 6 mg/kg/alternate days. However, several structural properties/components of nitrofen raise concerns, including its high lipophilicity (cLogP of nearly 5) and a potential toxophore in the form of a nitroarene group. Therefore, we developed analogues of nitrofen which lack the nitro group and/or have replaced the diaryl ether linker with a diarylamine that could allow modulation of polarity. In vitro anti-invasiveness activity of nitrofen analogues were evaluated by quantitative determination of invasion of MDA-MB-231-Luciferase cells through Matrigel using a Boyden chamber. Our in vivo data show that nitrofen efficiently blocks TNBC tumor metastasis. In vitro data suggest that this is not due to cytotoxicity, but rather is due to impairment of invasive capacity of the cells. Further, using an in vitro model of EMT, we show that nitrofen interferes with the process of EMT and promotes mesenchymal to epithelial transformation. In addition, we show that three of the nitrofen analogues significantly reduced invasive potential of TNBC cells, which may, at least partially, be attributed to the analogues' ability to promote mesenchymal to epithelial-like transformation of TNBC cells. Our study shows that nitrofen, and more importantly its analogues, are significantly effective in limiting the invasive potential of TNBC cell lines with minimal cytotoxic effect. Further, we demonstrate that nitrofen its analogues, are very effective in reversing mesenchymal phenotype to a more epithelial-like phenotype. This may be significant for the treatment of patients with mesenchymal-TNBC tumor subtype who are well known to exhibit high resistance to chemotherapy.

Peptide-Based Cancer Vaccine Strategies and Clinical Results

Active cancer immunotherapy is an exciting and developing field in oncology research. Peptide vaccines, the use of isolated immunogenic tumor-associated antigen (TAA) epitopes to generate an anticancer immune response, are an attractive option as they are easily produced and administered with minimal toxicity. Multiple TAA-derived peptides have been identified and evaluated with various vaccine strategies currently in clinical testing. Research suggests that utilizing vaccines in patients with minimal-residual disease may be a more effective strategy compared to targeting patients with widely metastatic disease as it avoids the immune suppression and tolerance associated with higher volumes of more established disease. Clinical trials also suggest that vaccines may need to be tailored and administered to specific cancer subtypes to achieve maximum efficacy. Additionally, numerous immunomodulators now in research and development show potential synergy with peptide vaccines. Our group has focused on a simpler, single-peptide strategy largely from the HER2/neu protein. We will discuss our experience thus far as well as review other peptide vaccine strategies that have shown clinical efficacy.