1
|
Andreyev J, Adams R, Bornschein J, Chapman M, Chuter D, Darnborough S, Davies A, Dignan F, Donnellan C, Fernandes D, Flavel R, Giebner G, Gilbert A, Huddy F, Khan MSS, Leonard P, Mehta S, Minton O, Norton C, Payton L, McGuire G, Pritchard DM, Taylor C, Vyoral S, Wilson A, Wedlake L. British Society of Gastroenterology practice guidance on the management of acute and chronic gastrointestinal symptoms and complications as a result of treatment for cancer. Gut 2025; 74:1040-1067. [PMID: 40068855 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival rates after a diagnosis of cancer are improving. Poorly managed gastrointestinal (GI) side effects can interfere with delivery of curative cancer treatment. Long-term physical side effects of cancer therapy impinge on quality of life in up to 25% of those treated for cancer, and GI side effects are the most common and troublesome. AIM To provide comprehensive, practical guidance on the management of acute and chronic luminal gastrointestinal symptoms arising during and after treatment for cancer METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert group including patients treated for cancer, divided into working parties to identify, and synthesise recommendations for the optimal assessment, diagnosis and appropriate interventions for luminal GI side effects of systemic and local cancer therapies. Recommendations were developed using the principles of the BMJ AGREE II reporting. RESULTS 103 recommendations were agreed. The importance of the patient perspective and what can be done to support patients are emphasised. Key physiological principles underlying the development of GI toxicity arising from cancer therapy are outlined. Individual symptoms or symptom clusters are poor at distinguishing the underlying cause(s), and investigations are required if empirical therapy does not lead rapidly to significant benefits. Patients frequently have multiple GI causes for symptoms; all need to be diagnosed and optimally treated to achieve resolution. Investigations and management approaches now known to be ineffective or of questionable benefit are highlighted. CONCLUSIONS The physical, emotional and financial costs to individuals, their families and society from cancer therapy can be considerable. Identifying and signposting affected patients who require specialist services is the role of all clinicians. Progress in the treatment of cancer increasingly means that patients require expert, multidisciplinary supportive care providing effective and safe treatment at every stage of the cancer journey. Development of such expertise should be prioritised as should the education of health professionals and the public in what, when and how acute and chronic gastrointestinal symptoms and complications should be managed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jervoise Andreyev
- Consultant Gastroenterologist and Honorary Professor, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust and The Medical School, The University of Nottingham, Lincoln, UK
| | - Richard Adams
- Professor and Honorary Consultant Clinical Oncologist, Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jan Bornschein
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, Medical Research Council Translational Immune Discovery Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford and John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Chapman
- Consultant Colorectal Surgeon, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Sally Darnborough
- GP and Clinical Lead, Pelvic Radiation Late Effects Service, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Andrew Davies
- Consultant Upper GI surgeon, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Fiona Dignan
- Consultant Haematologist, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Clare Donnellan
- Consultant Gatroenterologist, Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Darren Fernandes
- Specialist Registrar, Department of Gastroenterology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Georgina Giebner
- Dietitian, Macmillan Pelvic Radiation Disease, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alexandra Gilbert
- Associate Professor in Clinical Oncology, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Fiona Huddy
- Specialist Macmillan Oesophago-Gastric Dietitian, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Mohid Shakil S Khan
- Consultant in Gastroenterology & Neuroendocrine Tumours and Clinical Lead, South Wales Neuroendocrine Cancer Service, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Pauline Leonard
- Consultant Medical Oncologist, Barking Havering and Redbridge Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK
| | - Shameer Mehta
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ollie Minton
- Consultant in Palliative Medicine and Clinical Director for Cancer, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK
| | - Christine Norton
- Professor of Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - D Mark Pritchard
- Professor of Gastroenterology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Claire Taylor
- Macmillan Nurse Consultant, St Mark's Hospital, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Susan Vyoral
- Macmillan Oncology Dietitian, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Ana Wilson
- Consultant Gastroenterologist, St Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Linda Wedlake
- Lead Project Manager, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Linton AG, Dimitrova VG, Downing A, Wagland R, Glaser AW. Weakly supervised text classification on free-text comments in patient-reported outcome measures. Front Digit Health 2025; 7:1345360. [PMID: 40370705 PMCID: PMC12075198 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1345360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2025] [Indexed: 05/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Free-text comments in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data provide insights into health-related quality of life (HRQoL). However, these comments are typically analysed using manual methods, such as content analysis, which is labour-intensive and time-consuming. Machine learning analysis methods are largely unsupervised, necessitating post-analysis interpretation. Weakly supervised text classification (WSTC) can be a valuable analytical method of analysis for classifying domain-specific text data, especially when limited labelled data are available. In this paper, we applied five WSTC techniques to PROMs comment data to explore the extent to which they can be used to identify HRQoL themes reported by patients with prostate and colorectal cancer. Methods The main HRQoL themes and associated keywords were identified from a scoping review. They were used to classify PROMs comments with these themes from two national PROMs datasets: colorectal cancer (n = 5,634) and prostate cancer (n = 59,768). Classification was done using five keyword-based WSTC methods (anchored CorEx, BERTopic, Guided LDA, WeSTClass, and X-Class). To evaluate these methods, we assessed the overall performance of the methods and by theme. Domain experts reviewed the interpretability of the methods using the keywords extracted from the methods during training. Results Based on the 12 papers identified in the scoping review, we determined six main themes and corresponding keywords to label PROMs comments using WSTC methods. These themes were: Comorbidities, Daily Life, Health Pathways and Services, Physical Function, Psychological and Emotional Function, and Social Function. The performance of the methods varied across themes and between the datasets. While the best-performing model for both datasets, CorEx, attained weighted F1 scores of 0.57 (colorectal cancer) and 0.61 (prostate cancer), methods achieved an F1 score of up to 0.92 (Social Function) on individual themes. By evaluating the keywords extracted from the trained models, we saw that the methods that can utilise expert-driven seed terms and extrapolate based on limited data performed the best. Conclusions Overall, evaluating these WSTC methods provided insight into their applicability for analysing PROMs comments. Evaluating the classification performance illustrated the potential and limitations of keyword-based WSTC in labelling PROMs comments when labelled data are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Grace Linton
- UKRI CDT in AI for Medical Diagnosis and Care, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Amy Downing
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Wagland
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Adam W. Glaser
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
GebreLibanos H, Taye G, Wondimagegnehu A, Feyisa JD, Afework T, Gebreegziabher E, Gufue ZH. The quality of life of colorectal cancer patients attending the cancer center in addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Cancer 2025; 25:754. [PMID: 40263993 PMCID: PMC12012933 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-14122-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2025] [Indexed: 04/24/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer and the second most deadly. CRC significantly impairs patients' overall and health-related quality of life, as well as their psychological and physical function. However, in Ethiopia, there is insufficient local evidence about the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer. Hence, this study aimed to assess the quality of life of adult colorectal cancer patients who have follow-ups at the cancer center in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 159 colorectal cancer patients attending the Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital Cancer Center from February to April 2019. The validated Amharic version of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C-30) and the disease-specific colorectal cancer questionnaire (EORTC QLQ CR-29) were used. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify the factors associated with quality of life. The adjusted measure of effect (AOR) with a 95% CI was presented and P < 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance. RESULTS There were 159 colorectal cancer patients, 89 of whom were male, and the median time from diagnosis was 12.5 months. The patients had a low global health status score with a mean (± SD) of 52.88 ± 21.02. Being employed (AOR = 3.41; 95% CI 1.15, 10.17), early-stage clinical diagnosis (AOR = 4.98; 95% CI 1.51, 16.4), physical functioning (AOR = 1.04, 95% CI 1.01, 1.06), and social functioning (AOR = 1.02; 95% CI 1.01, 1.04) were associated with good quality of life. Whereas, being female (AOR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.05, 0.52), having financial difficulty (AOR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.96, 0.99), and having blood and mucus in the stool (AOR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.91, 0.96) were associated with poor quality of life. CONCLUSION In our study, half of our study participants had poor quality of life. The responsible stakeholders should identify and address the patients' respective symptoms. Female patients, those in severe clinical stages, unemployed patients, those experiencing financial difficulties, and those with blood and mucus in their stool should receive due attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen GebreLibanos
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Debre Birhan University, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia.
| | - Girma Taye
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Abigiya Wondimagegnehu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Jilicha Diribi Feyisa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Tsion Afework
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Sociology Department, School of Social and Political Science, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Zenawi Hagos Gufue
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lyhne JD, Gade L, Hansen L, Johansen A, Smith A'B, Jensen LH, Ventzel L. Survivor-driven development of a PROM for use in routine colorectal cancer care. Acta Oncol 2025; 64:475-483. [PMID: 40150842 PMCID: PMC11980947 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2025.42032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Despite the availability of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) for assessing survivorship care needs, their successful implementation remains limited. This study aimed to improve the likelihood of implementation success by actively engaging end-users in developing a PROM designed to address implementation barriers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Selected barriers for implementation were: (1) PROMs do not adequately address relevant issues, (2) PROMs can inhibit patient-clinician interaction, and (3) PROMs are not suitable for all patients. Management of these barriers were discussed at two 1-day workshops at Vejle Hospital with in-person attendance by colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors and informal caregivers (ICs). Relevant issues of CRC survivorship care (barrier 1) were defined based on data from four distinct sources. Solutions to overcoming barriers 2 and 3 were discussed at the workshops. Workshop data were guided by the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) guide. RESULTS The four distinct sources provided data from 4,545 CRC survivors. Thirteen individuals attended the in-person workshops. The following constructs were identified as relevant (barrier 1): self-rated well-being relative to pre-diagnosis, late effects encompassing both psychological and physical aspects, the role of caregivers, identity considerations, support systems, economic impacts, rehabilitation needs, and information provision. Specific element (e.g., keywords, prioritisation and agenda-setting) were incorporated to facilitate patient-clinician interactions (barrier 2). All constructs were considered relevant across all stages of CRC survivorship (barrier 3). The final PROM comprised 34 items. INTERPRETATION This dialogue-tool is designed to address implementation barriers by providing direct feedback on relevant late effects and supportive care needs from CRC survivors to clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne D Lyhne
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark.
| | - Lise Gade
- Survivor Representative, colorectal cancer survivor, Denmark
| | - Laila Hansen
- Survivor Representative, colorectal cancer survivor, Denmark
| | | | - Allan 'Ben' Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lars Henrik Jensen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark; Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Lise Ventzel
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark - Vejle, Denmark; Institute of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark; Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Vejle Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vallicelli C, Barbara SJ, Fabbri E, Perrina D, Griggio G, Agnoletti V, Catena F. Geriatric Approaches to Rectal Cancer: Moving Towards a Patient-Tailored Treatment Era. J Clin Med 2025; 14:1159. [PMID: 40004690 PMCID: PMC11855945 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2025] [Revised: 01/30/2025] [Accepted: 02/07/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer is a significant global health concern, particularly amongst the elderly population, with rectal cancer accounting for approximately one-third of cancer cases in this population. Older adults often present with advanced disease stages and unique clinical manifestations, such as tumors closer to the anal verge and with greater size. Diagnosis typically involves a series of screening and imaging strategies, culminating in accurate staging through pelvic MRI, endoscopic ultrasound, and CT scan. Management of rectal cancer in older adults emphasizes individualized treatment plans that consider both the cancer stage and the patient's overall health status, including frailty and comorbidities. A multidisciplinary approach, including a mandatory geriatric assessment, is essential for optimizing outcomes, in order to improve survival and quality of life for elderly patients with rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Vallicelli
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286, 47521 Cesena, Italy; (D.P.); (G.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Silvia Jasmine Barbara
- Department of Morphology, Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Elisa Fabbri
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Daniele Perrina
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286, 47521 Cesena, Italy; (D.P.); (G.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Giulia Griggio
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286, 47521 Cesena, Italy; (D.P.); (G.G.); (F.C.)
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy;
| | - Fausto Catena
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Viale Ghirotti 286, 47521 Cesena, Italy; (D.P.); (G.G.); (F.C.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McKigney N, Downing A, Velikova G, Brown JM, Harji DP. Registry-based study comparing health-related quality of life between patients with primary rectal cancer and locally recurrent rectal cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108736. [PMID: 39437587 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/25/2024]
Abstract
AIM National clinical registries offer the benefits of a comprehensive dataset, particularly when linked with patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. This aim of this study was to utilise UK registry data to assess cross-sectional differences in health-related quality of life (HrQoL) in patients with primary rectal (PRC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were extracted from the COloRECTal cancer Repository (CORECT-R) and the Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer - Quality of Life (LRRC-QoL) datasets. Propensity score matching was undertaken in a 1:1 ratio using two covariates: age and sex. The primary outcome was the FACT-C Colorectal Cancer Subscale (CCS). Statistical significance was determined using p < 0.05 and clinical significance using effect size (ES) and minimally important clinical difference (MCID). RESULTS A matched cohort with 72 patients in each group was identified. Overall FACT-C CCS scores were worse in patients with LRRC from a statistical (11.80 vs 18.03, p < 0.001) and clinically meaningful perspective (ES 1.63, MCID 6.23). Patients with PRC reported better digestion (p < 0.001, ES 0.85), better control over their bowels (p < 0.001, ES 1.03) and increased appetite (p < 0.001, ES 1.74, MCID 2.08). Patients with LRRC reported worse stomach swelling (p < 0,001, ES 0.97) and more diarrhoea (p < 0.001, ES 0.92), however they reported better body image (p < 0.001, ES 0.80). CONCLUSION Patients with LRRC reported significantly worse overall scores in the FACT-C CCS from both a statistical and clinical perspective, demonstrating the ability of the FACT-C to distinguish between these patient groups and the benefits of the inclusion of PROs within colorectal cancer registries, specifically including patients with advanced/recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh McKigney
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Cancer Epidemiology Group, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Julia M Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Deena P Harji
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mihăileanu F, Cismaru CA, Cordoș AA, Ciocan RA, Chiorescu S, Constantinescu I, Stancu B, Breazu C, Coman H, Berindan Neagoe I, Gherman CD. Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Validation in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:2481. [PMID: 39594147 PMCID: PMC11592747 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Revised: 10/24/2024] [Accepted: 11/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The quality of life of cancer patients is not only important for their well-being, but it has great influence on the overall survival and response to therapy, considering the adherence to treatment and follow-up. (2) Methods: This research is a prospective study conducted over a period of 6 months involving patients admitted in the Department of Surgery II, Cluj County Emergency Clinical Hospital. The specific questionnaire designed by us for patients with colorectal cancer contains questions about the quality of life and symptoms such as weight loss, pain, constipation, and diarrhoea. (3) Results: Our prospective study included in the analysis 50 patients with colorectal cancer. The CR 29 questionnaire outlined scores below 30 for sore skin, urinary incontinence, dysuria, faecal incontinence, flatulence, discomfort from bowel movement, sexual dysfunction and hair loss. The CR 30 functioning scale depicted high scores for cognitive (100%, 95% CI [0.91-1]), physical (88%, 95% CI [0.75-0.95]), and functional (88%, 95% CI [0.39-0.68]) domains and low scores (<50) for emotional (98%, 95% CI [0.88-0.99]) and social (100%, 95% CI [0.91-1]) functions. (4) Conclusions: The quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer was influenced by socio-economic status, smoking, surgical procedure, and neoplastic pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florin Mihăileanu
- Department of Surgery—Surgery II, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (F.M.); (S.C.); (I.C.); (B.S.)
| | - Cosmin Andrei Cismaru
- Research Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Ariana Anamaria Cordoș
- Department of Surgery—Practical Abilities, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (R.A.C.); (C.D.G.)
- Romanian Society of Medical Informatics, 300222 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Răzvan Alexandru Ciocan
- Department of Surgery—Practical Abilities, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (R.A.C.); (C.D.G.)
| | - Stefan Chiorescu
- Department of Surgery—Surgery II, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (F.M.); (S.C.); (I.C.); (B.S.)
| | - Ioana Constantinescu
- Department of Surgery—Surgery II, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (F.M.); (S.C.); (I.C.); (B.S.)
| | - Bogdan Stancu
- Department of Surgery—Surgery II, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (F.M.); (S.C.); (I.C.); (B.S.)
| | - Caius Breazu
- Department of Surgery—Anaesthetics, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Horațiu Coman
- Vascular Surgery Clinic, Cluj County Emergency Hospital, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Ioana Berindan Neagoe
- Research Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Claudia Diana Gherman
- Department of Surgery—Practical Abilities, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (R.A.C.); (C.D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Eriksen KS, Husebø SIE, Kørner H, Lode K. Long-term Recovery After Colorectal Cancer Surgery Among the Old: A Qualitative Study. Cancer Nurs 2024; 47:339-348. [PMID: 37088898 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide, disproportionally affecting older people. With modern treatment, older people are surviving cancer treatment and recovery. However, only a limited number of studies on the older person's experience of recovery exist. Knowledge of the experience of recovery among people 80 years or older is essential to optimize recovery and follow-up care. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of persons 80 years or older during recovery up to 2 years after curative colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS This exploratory inductive qualitative study was conducted through 18 individual in-depth interviews between July 2020 and June 2021. Content analysis was used to analyze the data. RESULTS The main theme identified was Recovery among the old is a complex process . It indicated that older people operated on for colorectal cancer may have intricate health challenges that affect recovery in addition to their cancer and treatment. The main theme is built upon the subthemes Individual factors affect colorectal cancer recovery and External support systems facilitate and impede colorectal recovery. CONCLUSION Important resources for recovery among old patients included their own coping ability and support from social networks and healthcare services. The identified barriers to recovery included other health problems and issues with healthcare services delivery. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE It is essential for healthcare personnel in contact with older patients to be aware of factors that influence their recovery to identify and preserve the older person's resources and implement health-promoting initiatives to optimize recovery when needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Sundt Eriksen
- Author Affiliations: Department of Research (Ms Eriksen and Dr Lode) and Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery (Ms Eriksen, and Drs Husebø and Kørner), Stavanger University Hospital; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger (Ms Eriksen, and Drs Husebø and Lode); and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen (Dr Kørner), Norway
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Miller NE, Lally P, Conway R, Steptoe A, Frank P, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Psychological distress and health behaviours in people living with and beyond cancer: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:15367. [PMID: 38965364 PMCID: PMC11224398 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66269-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to examine whether psychological distress was cross-sectionally associated with meeting World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) recommendations in people living with and beyond cancer. Participants were adults living with and beyond breast, prostate and colorectal cancer, participating in the baseline wave of the Advancing Survivorship after Cancer Outcomes Trial (ASCOT). Anxiety/depression was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and dichotomised into any/no problems. WCRF recommendations were assessed via pedometers, 24-h dietary recalls, self-reported alcohol intake (AUDIT-C), and self-reported smoking status. Participants were categorised as meeting WCRF recommendations using the following cut-offs: average daily steps (≥ 10,000/day), average weekly aerobic steps (≥ 15,000/day), fruit and vegetables (≥ 400 g/day), fibre (≥ 30 g/day), red meat (< 500 g/week), processed meat (0 g/day), high calorie food (fat ≤ 33% of total daily energy intake and free sugar ≤ 5% of total daily energy intake), alcohol (≤ 14 units/week) and smoking (non-smoking). A composite health behaviour risk index (CHBRI) was calculated by summing the number of WCRF recommendations met (range: 0-9). Among 1348 participants (mean age = 64 years (SD = 11.4)), 41.5% reported anxiety/depression problems. The mean CHBRI score was 4.4 (SD = 1.4). Anxiety/depression problems were associated with lower odds of meeting WCRF recommendations for average daily steps (odds ratio (OR) = 0.73; 95% CI 0.55, 0.97), but not for any other health behaviour. Psychological distress is associated with lower adherence to WCRF recommendations for physical activity in people living with and beyond cancer. Physical activity may be a mechanism linking psychological distress and poorer outcomes among people living with and beyond cancer, and this should be explored in longitudinal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Ella Miller
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK.
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Rana Conway
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Andrew Steptoe
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| | - Philipp Frank
- UCL Brain Sciences, University College London, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7BN, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Abi Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, Gower Street, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goodman W, Downing A, Allsop M, Munro J, Hubbard G, Beeken RJ. Understanding the associations between receipt of, and interest in, advice from a healthcare professional and quality of life in individuals with a stoma from colorectal cancer: a latent profile analysis. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:463. [PMID: 38922504 PMCID: PMC11208265 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08657-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore whether profiles derived from self-reported quality of life were associated with receipt of, and interest in, advice from a healthcare professional in people with a stoma. METHODS Secondary analysis of cross-sectional national survey data from England of 4487 people with a stoma from colorectal cancer. The survey assessed quality of life using various scales, receipt and interest in various forms of advice, and physical activity. A three-step latent profile analysis was conducted to determine the optimum number of profiles. Multinomial regression explored factors associated with profile membership. A series of logistic regression models examined whether profile membership was associated with interest in advice. RESULTS Five profiles were identified; 'consistently good quality of life', 'functional issues', 'functional and financial issues', 'low quality of life' and 'supported but struggling'. Individuals in the 'functional and financial issues' and 'low quality of life' profiles were more likely to have received financial advice compared to the 'consistently good quality of life' profile. When compared to the 'consistently good quality of life' profile, all other profiles were more likely to report wanting advice across a range of areas, with the strongest associations in the 'low quality of life' profile. CONCLUSION Findings indicate that people with a stoma are not a homogenous group in terms of quality of life. Participants in profiles with quality of life concerns report wanting more advice across various categories but findings suggest there is scope to explore how this can be tailored or adapted to specific groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy Downing
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Julie Munro
- Department of Nursing, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK
| | - Gill Hubbard
- School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lyhne JD, Smith A'B, Jensen LH, Hansen TF, Frostholm L, Timm S. Missingness mechanisms and generalizability of patient reported outcome measures in colorectal cancer survivors - assessing the reasonableness of the "missing completely at random" assumption. BMC Med Res Methodol 2024; 24:104. [PMID: 38702599 PMCID: PMC11067079 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02236-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) provide important information, however, missing PROM data threaten the interpretability and generalizability of findings by introducing potential bias. This study aims to provide insight into missingness mechanisms and inform future researchers on generalizability and possible methodological solutions to overcome missing PROM data problems during data collection and statistical analyses. METHODS We identified 10,236 colorectal cancer survivors (CRCs) above 18y, diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 through the Danish Clinical Registries. We invited a random 20% (2,097) to participate in a national survey in May 2023. We distributed reminder e-mails at day 10 and day 20, and compared Initial Responders (response day 0-9), Subsequent Responders (response day 10-28) and Non-responders (no response after 28 days) in demographic and cancer-related characteristics and PROM-scores using linear regression. RESULTS Of the 2,097 CRCs, 1,188 responded (57%). Of these, 142 (7%) were excluded leaving 1,955 eligible CRCs. 628 (32%) were categorized as initial responders, 418 (21%) as subsequent responders, and 909 (47%) as non-responders. Differences in demographic and cancer-related characteristics between the three groups were minor and PROM-scores only marginally differed between initial and subsequent responders. CONCLUSION In this study of long-term colorectal cancer survivors, we showed that initial responders, subsequent responders, and non-responders exhibit comparable demographic and cancer-related characteristics. Among respondents, Patient-Reported Outcome Measures were also similar, indicating generalizability. Assuming Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of subsequent responders represent answers by the non-responders (would they be available), it may be reasonable to judge the missingness mechanism as Missing Completely At Random.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne Dam Lyhne
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, Vejle, 7100, Denmark.
| | - Allan 'Ben' Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lars Henrik Jensen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, Vejle, 7100, Denmark
| | - Torben Frøstrup Hansen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, Vejle, 7100, Denmark
| | - Lisbeth Frostholm
- Research Clinic for Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Signe Timm
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Beriderbakken 4, Vejle, 7100, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Omar MT, Al-Malki MH, Bindawas SM, Alnahdi AH, Aljehan GH, M Al-Omari BN, Alhammad SA. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of McGill quality of life: revised questionnaire in the patients with cancer. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:1878-1887. [PMID: 37144328 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2207220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aims of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-revised (MQOL-R) to modern standard Arabic and to examine its reliability, construct, and discriminative validity in Arab patients with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Translation and cultural adaptation of the English MQOL-R to modern standard Arabic were performed according to international guidelines. For psychometric evaluation, 125 participants with cancer were selected and completed the MQOL-R along with Global Health Status/QoL and functional subscales of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status rating (ECOG-PS). The MQOL-R was tested for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. RESULTS The Arabic MQOL-R questionnaire had adequate internal consistency with Cronbach's alphas between 0.75 and 0.91. Test-retest reliability was very strong (ICC2.1 =0.91 to 0.96, p < 0.001). As hypothesized, the Arabic MQOL-R subscales demonstrated moderate to excellent correlation with functional subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30, and moderate to good correlation with Global health status/QoL. CONCLUSION The Arabic MQOL-R Questionnaire has adequate psychometric properties. Hence, it can be utilized in rehabilitation settings and research to measure health-related quality of life in the Arabic-speaking cancer population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Ta Omar
- Department of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
- Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Majed Hassan Al-Malki
- Department of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
- Rehabilitation Department, Prince Mishari Bin Saoud Hospital, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Saad M Bindawas
- Department of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali H Alnahdi
- Department of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ghaidaa H Aljehan
- Rehabilitation Department, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Badr Nasser M Al-Omari
- Department of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
- Rehabilitation Department, Prince Mishari Bin Saoud Hospital, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Saad A Alhammad
- Department of Rehabilitation Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li C, Tao M, Chen D, Wei Q, Xiong X, Zhao W, Tan W, Yang J, Han Y, Zhang H, Zhang S, Liu H, Cao JL. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Anxiety During Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e246589. [PMID: 38635271 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Perioperative anxiety is prevalent among patients undergoing surgical treatment of cancer and often influences their prognosis. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown potential in the treatment of various anxiety-related disorders, but data on the impact of tDCS on perioperative anxiety are limited. Objective To evaluate the effect of tDCS in reducing perioperative anxiety among patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer (CRC) resection. Design, Setting, And Participants This randomized clinical trial was conducted from March to August 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University. Patients aged 18 years or older undergoing elective laparoscopic radical resection for CRC were randomly assigned to either the active tDCS group or the sham tDCS group. Intention-to-treat data analysis was performed in September 2023. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to receive 2 sessions of either active tDCS or sham tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the afternoon of the day before the operation and in the morning of the day of operation. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was the incidence of perioperative anxiety from the day of the operation up to 3 days after the procedure, as measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) subscale (range: 0-21, with higher scores indicating more anxiety). Secondary outcomes included postoperative delirium (assessed by the Confusion Assessment Method or Confusion Assessment Method intensive care unit scale); pain (assessed by the 10-point Numeric Rating Scale [NRS], with scores ranging from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain]); frailty (assessed by the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness and Loss of Weight [FRAIL] Index, with scores ranging from 0 [most robust] to 5 [most frail]; and sleep quality (assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI], with scores ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating worse sleep quality) after the 2 sessions of the tDCS intervention. Results A total of 196 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.5 [11.0] years; 124 [63.3%] men) were recruited and randomly assigned to the active tDCS group (98 patients) or the sham tDCS group (98 patients). After the second tDCS intervention on the day of the operation, the incidence of perioperative anxiety was 38.8% in the active tDCS group and 70.4% in the sham tDCS group (relative risk, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.42-0.73]; P < .001). Patients in the active tDCS group vs the sham tDCS group were less likely to have postoperative delirium (8.2% vs 25.5%) and, at 3 days after the operation, had lower median (IQR) pain scores (NRS, 1.0 [1.0-1.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-2.0]), better median (IQR) sleep quality scores (PSQI, 10.5 [10.0-11.0] vs 12.0 [11.0-13.0]), and lower median (IQR) FRAIL Index (2.0 [1.0-2.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-3.0]). Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this randomized clinical trial indicate that administration of 2 preoperative sessions of tDCS was associated with a decreased incidence of perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective CRC resection. Active tDCS was also associated with better anxiety scores, pain levels, and sleep quality as well as reduced postoperative delirium and frailty. The findings suggest that tDCS may be a novel strategy for improving perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing CRC resection. Trial Registration Chinese Clinical Trial Register Identifier: ChiCTR2300068859.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunyan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Mingshu Tao
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Dexian Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Qi Wei
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Xingyu Xiong
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Wenxin Zhao
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Wen Tan
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Jie Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Yuan Han
- Department of Anesthesiology, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongxing Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Song Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital and Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - He Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology & Clinical Research Center for Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China
- Department of Anesthesiology & Clinical Research Center for Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, The Fifth School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, China
- Department of Anesthesiology & Clinical Research Center for Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, The Affiliated Huzhou Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Huzhou, China
- Department of Anesthesiology & Clinical Research Center for Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, The Affiliated Central Hospital, Huzhou University School of Medicine, Huzhou, China
| | - Jun-Li Cao
- National Medical Products Administration Key Laboratory for Research and Evaluation of Narcotic and Psychotropic Drugs, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Applied Technology of Anesthesia and Analgesia, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
- Huzhou Key Laboratory of Basic Research and Clinical Translation for Neuromodulation, The Fifth School of Clinical Medicine of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Andersson J, Angenete E, Gellerstedt M, Haglind E. Developing a multivariable prediction model of global health-related quality of life in patients treated for rectal cancer: a prospective study in five countries. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:35. [PMID: 38441657 PMCID: PMC10914847 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04605-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rectal cancer and its treatment have a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). If risk factors for sustained low HRQoL could be identified early, ideally before the start of treatment, individualised interventions could be identified and implemented to maintain or improve HRQoL. The study aimed to develop a multivariable prediction model for global HRQoL 12 months after rectal cancer treatment. METHODS Within COLOR II, a randomised, multicentre, international trial of laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer, a sub-study on HRQoL included 385 patients in 12 hospitals and five countries. The HRQoL study was optional for hospitals in the COLOR II trial. EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CR38 were analysed preoperatively and at 1 and 12 months postoperatively. In exploratory analyses, correlations between age, sex, fatigue, pain, ASA classification, complications, and symptoms after surgery to HRQoL were studied. Bivariate initial analyses were followed by multivariate regression models. RESULTS Patient characteristics and clinical factors explained 4-10% of the variation in global HRQoL. The patient-reported outcomes from EORTC QLQ-C30 explained 55-65% of the variation in global HRQoL. The predominant predictors were fatigue and pain, which significantly impacted global HRQoL at all time points measured. CONCLUSION We found that fatigue and pain were two significant factors associated with posttreatment global HRQoL in patients treated for rectal cancer T1-T3 Nx. Interventions to reduce fatigue and pain could enhance global HRQoL after rectal cancer treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT00297791.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Andersson
- Department of General and Orthopaedic Surgery, Alingsås Hospital, Alingsås, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eva Angenete
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Eva Haglind
- Department of Surgery, SSORG - Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Department of Surgery, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aggarwal A, Choudhury A, Fearnhead N, Kearns P, Kirby A, Lawler M, Quinlan S, Palmieri C, Roques T, Simcock R, Walter FM, Price P, Sullivan R. The future of cancer care in the UK-time for a radical and sustainable National Cancer Plan. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:e6-e17. [PMID: 37977167 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00511-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Cancer affects one in two people in the UK and the incidence is set to increase. The UK National Health Service is facing major workforce deficits and cancer services have struggled to recover after the COVID-19 pandemic, with waiting times for cancer care becoming the worst on record. There are severe and widening disparities across the country and survival rates remain unacceptably poor for many cancers. This is at a time when cancer care has become increasingly complex, specialised, and expensive. The current crisis has deep historic roots, and to be reversed, the scale of the challenge must be acknowledged and a fundamental reset is required. The loss of a dedicated National Cancer Control Plan in England and Wales, poor operationalisation of plans elsewhere in the UK, and the closure of the National Cancer Research Institute have all added to a sense of strategic misdirection. The UK finds itself at a crossroads, where the political decisions of governments, the cancer community, and research funders will determine whether we can, together, achieve equitable, affordable, and high-quality cancer care for patients that is commensurate with our wealth, and position our outcomes among the best in the world. In this Policy Review, we describe the challenges and opportunities that are needed to develop radical, yet sustainable plans, which are comprehensive, evidence-based, integrated, patient-outcome focused, and deliver value for money.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Aggarwal
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Division of Cancer Sciences, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Nicola Fearnhead
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Pam Kearns
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anna Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mark Lawler
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queens University Belfast Belfast, UK
| | | | - Carlo Palmieri
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, & Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Tom Roques
- Royal College of Radiologists & Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Richard Simcock
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Pat Price
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Richard Sullivan
- Institute of Cancer Policy, Centre for Cancer, Society & Public Health, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Randhawa SE, Tenner L. Survivorship in Early-Stage Rectal Cancer Patients Who Have Received Combined Modality Therapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:375-382. [PMID: 37586927 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Survival rates in early-stage rectal cancer patients have increased over the past few decades. Societies such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), American Cancer Society (ACS), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) have proposed guidelines related to cancer survivorship care including formal recommendations to address the needs in early-stage rectal cancer survivors. These guidelines, in addition to new clinical research findings in survivorship will be reviewed, specifically looking at physical, psychosocial, and financial concerns in rectal cancer survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saboor E Randhawa
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Fellow, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Laura Tenner
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jefford M, Emery JD, James Martin A, De Abreu Lourenco R, Lisy K, Grunfeld E, Mohamed MA, King D, Tebbutt NC, Lee M, Mehrnejad A, Burgess A, Marker J, Eggins R, Carrello J, Thomas H, Schofield P. SCORE: a randomised controlled trial evaluating shared care (general practitioner and oncologist) follow-up compared to usual oncologist follow-up for survivors of colorectal cancer. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 66:102346. [PMID: 38094163 PMCID: PMC10716007 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND SCORE is the first randomised controlled trial (RCT) to examine shared oncologist and general practitioner (GP) follow-up for survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC). SCORE aimed to show that shared care (SC) was non-inferior to usual care (UC) on the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHQ-QoL) scale to 12 months. METHODS The study recruited patients from five public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia between February 2017 and May 2021. Patients post curative intent treatment for stage I-III CRC underwent 1:1 randomisation to SC and UC. SC replaced two oncologist visits with GP visits and included a survivorship care plan and primary care management guidelines. Assessments were at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Difference between groups on GHQ-QoL to 12 months was estimated from a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM), with a non-inferiority margin (NIM) of -10 points. Secondary endpoints included quality of life (QoL); patient perceptions of care; costs and clinical care processes (CEA tests, recurrences). Registration ACTRN12617000004369p. FINDINGS 150 consenting patients were randomised to SC (N = 74) or UC (N = 76); 11 GPs declined. The mean (SD) GHQ-QoL scores at 12 months were 72 (20.2) for SC versus 73 (17.2) for UC. The MMRM mean estimate of GHQ-QoL across the 6 month and 12 month follow-up was 69 for SC and 73 for UC, mean difference -4.0 (95% CI: -9.0 to 0.9). The lower limit of the 95% CI did not cross the NIM. There was no clear evidence of differences on other QoL, unmet needs or satisfaction scales. At 12 months, the majority preferred SC (40/63; 63%) in the SC group, with equal preference for SC (22/62; 35%) and specialist care (22/62; 35%) in UC group. CEA completion was higher in SC. Recurrences similar between arms. Patients in SC on average incurred USD314 less in health costs versus UC patients. INTERPRETATION SC seems to be an appropriate and cost-effective model of follow-up for CRC survivors. FUNDING Victorian Cancer Agency and Cancer Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Jefford
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jon D. Emery
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Karolina Lisy
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Eva Grunfeld
- Department of Community and Family Medicine and Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Mustafa Abdi Mohamed
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Dorothy King
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Margaret Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ashkan Mehrnejad
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adele Burgess
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Centre, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Julie Marker
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Renee Eggins
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Joseph Carrello
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hayley Thomas
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Penelope Schofield
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychology and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lally P, Miller NE, Lawrence C, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Associations of self-reported and device-assessed physical activity with fatigue, quality of life, and sleep quality in adults living with and beyond cancer. JOURNAL OF SPORT AND HEALTH SCIENCE 2023; 12:664-673. [PMID: 37172763 PMCID: PMC10658319 DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Greater physical activity is associated with improved outcomes in people living with and beyond cancer. However, most studies in exercise oncology use self-reported measures of physical activity. Few have explored agreement between self-reported and device-based measures of physical activity in people living with and beyond cancer. This study aimed to describe physical activity in adults affected by cancer across self-reported and device-assessed activity, to explore levels of agreement between these measures in terms of their utility for categorizing participants as meeting/not meeting physical activity guidelines, and to explore whether meeting guidelines is associated with fatigue, quality of life, and sleep quality. METHODS A total of 1348 adults living with and beyond cancer from the Advancing Survivorship Cancer Outcomes Trial completed a survey assessing fatigue, quality of life, sleep quality, and physical activity. The Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to calculate a Leisure Score Index (LSI) and an estimate of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Average daily steps and weekly aerobic steps were derived from pedometers worn by participants. RESULTS The percentage of individuals meeting physical activity guidelines was 44.3% using LSI, 49.5% using MVPA, 10.8% using average daily steps, and 28.5% using weekly aerobic steps. Agreement (Cohen's κ) between self-reported and pedometer measures ranged from 0.13 (LSI vs. average daily steps) to 0.60 (LSI vs. MVPA). After adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related covariates, meeting activity guidelines using all measures was associated with not experiencing severe fatigue (odds ratios (ORs): 1.43-1.97). Meeting guidelines using MVPA was associated with no quality-of-life issues (OR = 1.53). Meeting guidelines using both self-reported measures were associated with good sleep quality (ORs: 1.33-1.40). CONCLUSION Less than half of all adults affected by cancer are meeting physical activity guidelines, regardless of measure. Meeting guidelines is associated with lower fatigue across all measures. Associations with quality of life and sleep differ depending on measure. Future research should consider the impact of physical activity measure on findings, and where possible, use multiple measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillippa Lally
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Natalie Ella Miller
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Claire Lawrence
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Abigail Fisher
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fernandes DCR, Nelson D, Siriwardena AN, Law G, Andreyev HJN. Understanding colorectal cancer patient follow-up: a qualitative interview study. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:634. [PMID: 37843671 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08108-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are increasing numbers of patients who have been treated for colorectal cancer (CRC) who struggle with ongoing physical and psychological symptoms. 'Cancer survivor' is often used to describe these patients but this terminology remains controversial. This study sought to understand the follow-up experience of CRC patients in the UK and identify the terminology they prefer following diagnosis and treatment. METHODS Purposeful sampling of patients from specialist CRC follow-up clinics was performed until data saturation was achieved. Two 1:1 semi-structured qualitative interviews were performed for each participant. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Seventeen participants, median age = 62, 53% male were interviewed. Several themes were identified. Of note, fear of cancer recurrence dominates patients' agendas at follow-up appointments. There are also clinical and administrative barriers to discussing symptoms including being embarrassed, feeling that their symptoms were not relevant or not having enough time to discuss issues. However, there are several methods which may improve this, such as through the use of video consultations and questionnaires. In addition, patients identified inadequate holistic support despite significant psychological and social distress. Our data suggest that labelling a diverse group of patients as 'cancer survivors' can be problematic. CONCLUSION It is important that clinicians systematically screen patients for symptoms that are known to occur following treatment. Clinicians and patients should have routine access to pathways and programmes that can support patients in navigating their life after cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren C R Fernandes
- The Department of Gastroenterology, United Lincolnshire NHS Trust, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK.
- Community and Health Research Unit, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
| | - David Nelson
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
- Macmillan Cancer Support, London, UK
| | | | - Graham Law
- Lincoln Clinical Trials Unit, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | - H Jervoise N Andreyev
- The Department of Gastroenterology, United Lincolnshire NHS Trust, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK
- The Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Koutoukidis DA, Jebb SA, Foster C, Wheatstone P, Horne A, Hill TM, Taylor A, Realpe A, Achana F, Buczacki SJA. CARE: Protocol of a randomised trial evaluating the feasibility of preoperative intentional weight loss to support postoperative recovery in patients with excess weight and colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:1910-1920. [PMID: 37525408 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
AIM Excess weight increases the risk of morbidity following colorectal cancer surgery. Weight loss may improve morbidity, but it is uncertain whether patients can follow an intensive weight loss intervention while waiting for surgery and there are concerns about muscle mass loss. The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility of intentional weight loss in this setting and determine progression to a definitive trial. METHODS CARE is a prospectively registered, multicentre, feasibility, parallel, randomised controlled trial with embedded evaluation and optimisation of the recruitment process. Participants with excess weight awaiting curative colorectal resection for cancer are randomised 1:1 to care as usual or a low-energy nutritionally-replete total diet replacement programme with weekly remote behavioural support by a dietitian. Progression criteria will be based on the recruitment, engagement, adherence, and retention rates. Data will be collected on the 30-day postoperative morbidity, the typical primary outcome of prehabilitation trials. Secondary outcomes will include, among others, length of hospital stay, health-related quality of life, and body composition. Qualitative interviews will be used to understand patients' experiences of and attitudes towards trial participation and intervention engagement and adherence. CONCLUSION CARE will evaluate the feasibility of intensive intentional weight loss as prehabilitation before colorectal cancer surgery. The results will determine the planning of a definitive trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios A Koutoukidis
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Susan A Jebb
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC+ in Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Alison Horne
- Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - T Martyn Hill
- Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Amy Taylor
- Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alba Realpe
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Felix Achana
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon J A Buczacki
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Takei H, Kunitoh H, Wakabayashi M, Kataoka T, Sekino Y, Mizutani T, Tsuboi M, Ikeda N, Asamura H, Okada M, Takahama M, Ohde Y, Okami J, Shiono S, Aokage K, Watanabe SI. Prospective, Multi-Institutional Observational Study of Deterioration in Activities of Daily Living in Elderly Patients After Lung Cancer Surgery. JTO Clin Res Rep 2023; 4:100550. [PMID: 37600227 PMCID: PMC10432798 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction To determine the rate of deteriorating activities of daily living (ADL) and to investigate predictive factors in elderly patients undergoing surgery for NSCLC. Methods Patients with NSCLC aged 75 years or older who underwent curative surgical resection were evaluated using the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence Instrumental ADL (TMIG-IADL) and the Japanese version of EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) quality-of-life scale administered at baseline and at 6 months postoperative. The primary end point was the rate of living patients without substantial deterioration of TMIG-IADL, defined as a decline greater than or equal to three points. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors for deteriorating ADL. Results Between May 2019 and May 2020, 876 of the 986 screened patients enrolled from 47 institutions were eligible and included in the analysis. TMIG-IADL and EQ-5D-5L scores were obtained from 96.0% and 92.6% of the patients, respectively. At 6 months postoperative, 745 patients (85.1%, 95% confidence interval: 82.5%-87.3%) reported no significant ADL deterioration, and 96 of 841 patients (11.4%) with postoperative score data reported significant deterioration. The social domain was the most frequently affected activity. In multivariable analysis, poor performance status, low G8 geriatric screening score, segmentectomy (versus wedge resection), and surgery lasting less than 3 hours were associated with deteriorating ADL. Worsening EQ-5D-5L scores by minimally important difference or more were observed in 22.1% of the patients. Changes in TMIG-IADL and EQ-5D-5L scores were poorly correlated. Conclusions Approximately 15% of elderly patients with NSCLC experienced significant ADL deterioration at 6 months postoperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidefumi Takei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Kunitoh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Wakabayashi
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoko Kataoka
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Sekino
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Masahiro Tsuboi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Norihiko Ikeda
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hisao Asamura
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Morihito Okada
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Makoto Takahama
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Ohde
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Jiro Okami
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Shiono
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
- Department of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Keijyu Aokage
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Shun-ichi Watanabe
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Feng Z, Meng J, Sun Y, Xie T, Lu W, Wang G, Geng J. Assessment of patients' preferences for new anticancer drugs in China: a best-worst discrete choice experiment on three common cancer types. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072469. [PMID: 37270199 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite the advancement in anticancer drug therapies, cancer treatment decisions are often complex and preference-sensitive, making them well suited for studying shared decision-making (SDM). Our study aimed to assess preferences for new anticancer drugs among three common types of patients with cancer to inform SDM. DESIGN We identified five attributes of new anticancer drugs and used a Bayesian-efficient design to generate choice sets for a best-worst discrete choice experiment (BWDCE). The mixed logit regression model was applied to estimate patient-reported preferences for each attribute. The interaction model was used to investigate preference heterogeneity. SETTING The BWDCE was conducted in Jiangsu province and Hebei province in China. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 18 years or older, who had a definite diagnosis of lung cancer, breast cancer or colorectal cancer were recruited. RESULTS Data from 468 patients were available for analysis. On average, the most valued attribute was the improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (p<0.001). The low incidence of severe to life-threatening side effects, prolonged progression-free survival and the low incidence of mild to moderate side effects were also positive predictors of patients' preferences (p<0.001). Out-of-pocket cost was a negative predictor of their preferences (p<0.001). According to subgroup analysis by type of cancer, the improvement in HRQoL remained the most valuable attribute. However, the relative importance of other attributes varied by type of cancer. Whether patients were newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed cancer cases played a dominant role in the preference heterogeneity within each subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Our study can assist in the implementation of SDM by providing evidence on patients' preferences for new anticancer drugs. Patients should be informed of the multiattribute values of new drugs and encouraged to make decisions reflecting their values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Feng
- Department of Medical Informatics, Nantong University Medical School, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jingyi Meng
- Department of Medical Informatics, Nantong University Medical School, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yanjun Sun
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tinghu District People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China
| | - Tongling Xie
- Department of Medical Informatics, Nantong University Medical School, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Medical Informatics, The People's Hospital of Rugao, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wenzhang Lu
- Department of Respiratory, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Guohua Wang
- Institute of Special Environmental Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jinsong Geng
- Department of Medical Informatics, Nantong University Medical School, Nantong, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dong B, Zhang J, Wang F, Xie C, Qi Y, Lin L, Tian L. Supportive care needs of patients with colorectal cancer undergoing anticancer therapy: A latent class analysis. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2023; 10:100216. [PMID: 37251113 PMCID: PMC10220408 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study was aimed at identifying the potential subgroups of supportive care needs among Chinese patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) through latent class analysis (LCA) and clarifying the characteristics of patients with high needs. Methods From January to September 2020, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in the Oncology Department and Radiotherapy Department of four tertiary grade A hospitals in Suzhou by using the general information questionnaire and Comprehensive Needs Assessment Tool for patients with cancer. Potential subgroups of supportive care needs were identified through LCA, and the association between the subgroups and statistical variables was analyzed with chi-square tests to clarify the demographic characteristics of the high-need group. This study was not registered. Results A total of 403 patients with CRC were included in the survey. LCA indicated two subgroups of supportive care needs in patients with CRC: a high-need group (51.86% of patients) and a low-need group (48.14% patients). In both groups, the probability of healthcare staff and information needs was high (> 50%). Single/divorced/widowed patients had greater supportive care needs than married patients, and patients with rectal cancer had greater supportive care needs than those with colon cancer. Conclusions Patients' healthcare staff and information needs are of critical importance. Focus should be placed on unmarried, patients with rectal cancer, as well as those receiving chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or palliative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bei Dong
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- School of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Suzhou, China
| | - Jiyin Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- School of Nursing, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Fen Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Congyan Xie
- School of Nursing, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Yishu Qi
- School of Nursing, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Lu Lin
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- School of Nursing, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Li Tian
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
- School of Nursing, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kennedy F, Lally P, Miller NE, Conway RE, Roberts A, Croker H, Fisher A, Beeken RJ. Fatigue, quality of life and associations with adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund guidelines for health behaviours in 5835 adults living with and beyond breast, prostate and colorectal cancer in England: A cross-sectional study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:12705-12716. [PMID: 37021752 PMCID: PMC10278485 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many individuals living with and beyond cancer (LWBC) have ongoing quality of life (QoL) issues, including fatigue. The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) provides health behaviour recommendations for people LWBC, and there is some evidence linking adherence to these with improved QoL. METHODS Adults LWBC (specifically breast, colorectal or prostate cancer) completed a survey covering health behaviours (diet, physical activity, alcohol consumption and smoking), fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue Scale, version 4) and a broad measure of QoL (EQ-5D-5L descriptive scale). Participants were categorised as meeting/not meeting WCRF recommendations, using the following cut-offs classified as meeting the guidelines: ≥150 min physical activity/week, fruit and vegetables (≥5 portions/day), fibre (≥30 g fibre per day), free sugar (<5% of total calories from free sugar), fat (<33% total energy), red meat (<500 g/week), processed meat (none), alcohol consumption (<14 units/week) and not a current smoker. Logistic regression analyses explored associations between WCRF adherence and fatigue and QoL issues, controlling for demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS Among 5835 individuals LWBC (mean age: 67 years, 56% female, 90% white, breast 48%, prostate 32% and colorectal 21%), 22% had severe fatigue and 72% had 1+ issue/s on the EQ-5D-5L. Adhering to physical activity recommendations (odds ratio [OR] = 0.88, confidence interval [CI] = 0.77-0.99), meeting various dietary recommendations (fruit and vegetables OR = 0.79; CI = 0.68-0.91, free sugar OR = 0.85; CI = 0.76-0.96, fat OR = 0.71; CI = 0.62-0.82, red meat OR = 0.65; CI = 0.50-0.85) and not smoking (OR = 0.53, CI = 0.41-0.67) were associated with decreased odds of experiencing severe fatigue. Adhering to physical activity guidelines (OR = 0.71, CI = 0.62-0.82) was also associated with decreased odds of having 1+ QoL issue/s. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to various WCRF recommendations, particularly the recommendation for physical activity, was associated with less fatigue and better QoL in a large UK cohort of people living with and beyond breast, colorectal or prostate cancer. Multi-component interventions designed to support people LWBC to improve health behaviours, in line with the levels recommended by the WCRF, may also improve QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Kennedy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsClarendon WayLeedsLS2 9NLUK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of SurreyGuildfordSurreyGU2 7XHUK
| | - Natalie Ella Miller
- Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondonWC1E 6BTUK
| | - Rana E. Conway
- Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondonWC1E 6BTUK
| | - Anna Roberts
- Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondonWC1E 6BTUK
| | - Helen Croker
- World Cancer Research Fund International140 Pentonville RoadLondonN1 9FWUK
| | - Abigail Fisher
- Behavioural Science and HealthUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondonWC1E 6BTUK
| | - Rebecca J. Beeken
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of LeedsClarendon WayLeedsLS2 9NLUK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Waddell O, Mclauchlan J, McCombie A, Glyn T, Frizelle F. Quality of life in early-onset colorectal cancer patients: systematic review. BJS Open 2023; 7:7156601. [PMID: 37151082 PMCID: PMC10165061 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increasing incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer; however, the psychosocial impacts of this disease on younger adults have been seldom explored. METHODS A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed, and Scopus were searched, and papers were included if published in English within the last 10 years and if they reported results separately by age (including early-onset colorectal cancer, defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years). Critical appraisal of all studies was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The primary outcome of interest was the global quality of life in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. Secondary outcomes included the effect on sexual function, body image, finances, career, emotional distress, and social and family functioning. RESULTS The search yielded 168 manuscripts and 15 papers were included in the review after screening. All studies were observational, and included a total of 18 146 patients, of which 5015 were patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. The studies included scored highly using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools, indicating good quality and a low risk of bias, but data synthesis was not performed due to the wide range of scoring systems that were used across the studies. Six papers reported significant negative impacts on quality of life in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer. Three of the four studies that compared the quality of life in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer with older patients found that the younger group had worse mean quality-of-life scores (P ≤ 0.05). Secondary outcomes measured in five studies in relation to sexual dysfunction, body image, financial and career impacts, and social and family impacts and in eight studies in relation to emotional distress were found to be more severely impacted in those with early-onset colorectal cancer compared with those with late-onset colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION Whilst data are limited, the impact of colorectal cancer is different in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer compared with older patients in relation to several aspects of the quality of life. This is particularly prominent in areas of global quality of life, sexual functioning, family concerns, and financial impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Waddell
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jared Mclauchlan
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Andrew McCombie
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Tamara Glyn
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Frank Frizelle
- Department of Surgery, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Haas S, Mikkelsen AH, Kronborg CJS, Oggesen BT, Møller PF, Fassov J, Frederiksen NA, Krogsgaard M, Graugaard-Jensen C, Ventzel L, Christensen P, Emmertsen KJ. Management of treatment-related sequelae following colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:458-488. [PMID: 35969031 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Colorectal cancer survivors are one of the most rapidly growing groups of patients living with and beyond cancer. In a national multidisciplinary setting, we have examined the extent of late treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors and present the scientific evidence for management of these conditions in this patient category with the aim of facilitating identification and treatment. METHOD A systematic search for existing guidelines and relevant studies was performed across 16 and 4 databases, respectively, from inception to 2021. This yielded 13 guidelines and 886 abstracts, of which 188 were included in the finalized guideline (231 included for full text review). Secondarily, bibliographies were cross-referenced and 53 additional articles were included. RESULTS Symptoms have been divided into overall categories including psychosocial, bowel-related, urinary, sexual (male and female), pain/neuropathy and fatigue symptoms or complaints that are examined individually. Merging and grading of data resulted in 22 recommendations and 42 management strategies across categories. Recommendations are of a more general character, whereas management strategies provide more practical advice suited for initiation on site before referral to specialized units. CONCLUSION Treatment-related sequelae in colorectal cancer survivors are common and attention needs to be focused on identifying patients with unmet treatment needs and the development of evidence-based treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Haas
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Pia F Møller
- Department of Surgery, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Janne Fassov
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Lise Ventzel
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen
- Department of Surgery, Danish Cancer Society National Research Center for Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects Following Pelvic Organ Cancer, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Völkel V, Steinger B, Koller M, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Lindberg-Scharf P. Colorectal cancer survivors' long-term recollections of their illness and therapy up to seven years after enrolment into a randomised controlled clinical trial. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:149. [PMID: 36782134 PMCID: PMC9926648 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10604-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As a consequence of effective treatment procedures, the number of long-term survivors of colorectal cancer is ever increasing. Adopting the method of a previous study on breast cancer patients, the goal of the present research was to investigate colorectal cancer patients' recollections of their illness and treatment experiences up to seven years after they have been enrolled in a randomised controlled clinical trial on the direct improvement of quality of life (RCT DIQOL). METHODS Colorectal cancer survivors in Bavaria, Germany were mailed a questionnaire on average 78·3 months after the start of their therapy and enrolment into RCT DIQOL. The questionnaire enquired about their worst experience during the colorectal cancer episode, positive aspects of the illness, and any advice they would give to newly diagnosed patients. Patient responses were categorised by two independent raters and cross-checked by a third independent rater. Frequencies of these categories were then quantitatively analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Of 146 remaining survivors initially enrolled in RCT DIQOL, 96 (66%) returned the questionnaire. The majority (33%) of statements regarding the worst experience was referring to "psychological distress", followed by "indigestion and discomfort during defecation" (17%), and "cancer diagnosis" (16%). Among survivors with history of a stoma, the majority (36%) regarded "stoma" as their worst experience. With 45%, "change in life priorities" has been the most frequent positive category before "support by physicians/ nurses" (25%). 43% of the survivors deemed "fighting spirit" as most important advice to overcome the disease. CONCLUSION Even after many years, colorectal cancer survivors clearly remember experiences from the time of their illness. Echoing the results of the previous breast cancer survivors' study, "psychological distress", "change in life priorities" and "fighting spirit" emerged as prominent concepts. In addition, some aspects like the impact of a stoma are of specific importance for colorectal cancer survivors. These findings can be used to inform programmes to improve patient- and quality of life centred aftercare of tumour patients. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION NCT04930016, date of registration 18.06.2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinzenz Völkel
- Tumour Centre Regensburg, Centre of Quality Management and Health Services Research, University of Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Brunhilde Steinger
- grid.7727.50000 0001 2190 5763Tumour Centre Regensburg, Centre of Quality Management and Health Services Research, University of Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Michael Koller
- grid.411941.80000 0000 9194 7179Centre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
- grid.7727.50000 0001 2190 5763Tumour Centre Regensburg, Centre of Quality Management and Health Services Research, University of Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Patricia Lindberg-Scharf
- grid.7727.50000 0001 2190 5763Tumour Centre Regensburg, Centre of Quality Management and Health Services Research, University of Regensburg, Am BioPark 9, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sjövall A, Lagergren P, Johar A, Buchli C. Quality of life and patient reported symptoms after colorectal cancer in a Swedish population. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:191-201. [PMID: 36097801 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM A proportion of patients treated for colorectal cancer have impaired quality of life (QoL) but it is uncertain if the level of QoL differs from the corresponding background population. This population-based cohort study aimed to evaluate health-related QoL in colorectal cancer patients and compare their QoL with that of a Swedish reference population. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer Stages I-III in the Stockholm-Gotland region in 2013-2015 received the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-CR29 questionnaires and the low anterior resection syndrome score, 1 year after surgery. Patient and tumour data were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The patient cohort was matched to a Swedish reference population regarding EORTC QLQ-C30. Global QoL was compared to the reference population and a patient group with impaired QoL was defined. Detailed patient-reported outcomes were analysed in relation to global QoL in the patient cohort. RESULTS A total of 925 patients returned the questionnaires and 358 patients (38.70%) reported a clinically relevant impaired global QoL compared to the reference population. Patients with impaired QoL reported clinically relevant and statistically significantly more complaints regarding bowel habits, pain and anxiety. After adjustment for sex, age and stoma, anxiety was the strongest predictor for impaired QoL, with OR 6.797 (95% CI 4.677-9.879). CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of patients treated for colorectal cancer have impaired global QoL. This impairment is strongly associated with several physical symptoms and anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Sjövall
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, GI Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Asif Johar
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christian Buchli
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, GI Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Clinical efficacy of Daikenchuto (DKT: TJ-100) for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with a history of colon and rectosigmoid cancer surgery: a randomized crossover study. Surg Today 2023:10.1007/s00595-022-02640-2. [PMID: 36662306 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-022-02640-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This randomized crossover trial investigated the effects of Daikenchuto (DKT: TJ-100) on gastrointestinal symptoms of patients after colon and rectosigmoid cancer surgery. METHODS Among patients who had completed surgery for colon cancer, including rectosigmoid cancer, over 6 months ago, 20 who complained of gastrointestinal symptoms were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to two sequences: sequences: A and B. In period 1, sequence A subjects were orally administered DKT, whereas sequence B subjects were untreated for 28 days. After a 5-day interval, in period 2, sequences A and B were reversed. Quality-of-life markers (GSRS and VAS), the Sitzmark transit study, the orocecal transit time (lactulose hydrogen breath test) and Gas volume score were evaluated before and after each period with findings compared between the presence of absence of DKT administration. RESULTS Between sequences, there were no significant differences in clinicopathological characters or any evaluations before randomization. There was no carryover effect in this crossover trial. The administration of DKT significantly ameliorated the GSRS in total, indigestion, and diarrhea, although the planned number of subjects for inclusion in this trial was not reached. CONCLUSIONS DKT may ameliorate subjective symptoms for postoperative patients who complain of gastrointestinal symptoms.
Collapse
|
30
|
Bandyopadhyay R, Dey S, Basu A, Banerjee S. Factors affecting health-related quality of life among patients with colorectal cancer using the european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life core questionnaire-CR29. JOURNAL OF MARINE MEDICAL SOCIETY 2023. [DOI: 10.4103/jmms.jmms_181_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
|
31
|
Survival Outcomes after Elective or Emergency Surgery for Synchronous Stage IV Colorectal Cancer. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123114. [PMID: 36551870 PMCID: PMC9775222 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) who have not undergone primary tumor resection (PTR) are at risk of sudden medical emergencies. Despite the ongoing controversy over the necessity and timing of PTR in patients with stage IV CRC, studies comparing the survival outcomes of elective and emergency surgery in this population are scarce. This is a retrospective study conducted at a single institute. The patients were divided into two groups: the elective surgery (ELS) group (n = 46) and the emergency surgery (EMS) group (n = 26). The primary outcome was 2-year overall survival (OS). During a median follow-up period of 27.0 months, the 2-year OS was significantly better in the ELS group (80% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.002). No significant differences were observed in the 2-year relapse-free survival and 30-day postoperative complication rates. Planning and performing elective surgery could help increase the survival rate of patients with synchronous stage IV CRC, especially those that undergo simultaneous or staged metastasectomy.
Collapse
|
32
|
Aronsen S, Conway R, Lally P, Roberts A, Croker H, Beeken RJ, Fisher A. Determinants of sleep quality in 5835 individuals living with and beyond breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional survey. J Cancer Surviv 2022; 16:1489-1501. [PMID: 34750779 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01127-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study aimed to quantify the level of sleep problems in 5835 breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors, and explore a number of potential determinants of poor sleep quality in the present sample. BMI, diet, and physical activity were of particular interest as potential determinants. METHODS Participants who completed the 'Health and Lifestyle after Cancer' survey were adults who had been diagnosed with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer (mean time since cancer diagnosis was 35.5 months, SD=13.56). Sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. BMI was calculated from self-reported height and weight. Participants were categorised as meeting/not meeting the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) recommendations for fibre, fruit and vegetables, added sugar, red meat, processed meat, fat, alcohol, and physical activity. Analyses accounted for demographic and clinical factors. RESULTS Fifty-seven percent of those with sleep data were classified as poor sleepers (response rate 79%). Being female, having a higher number of cancer treatments, more comorbid conditions, and being more anxious/depressed increased the odds of being a poor sleeper. After adjustment for these factors, there were no associations between diet/alcohol/physical activity and sleep. However, BMI was associated with sleep. Individuals in the overweight and obese categories had 22% and 79% higher odds of being poor sleepers than individuals in the underweight/healthy weight category, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that there may be a need to develop sleep quality interventions for cancer survivors with obesity. Even after adjustment for multiple clinical and demographic factors, BMI (particularly obesity) was associated with poor sleep. Thus, researchers and health professionals should find ways to support individuals with overweight and obesity to improve their sleep quality. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The present findings highlight that poor sleep is a common issue in cancer survivors. Interventions seeking to improve outcomes for cancer survivors over the longer term should consider sleep quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Aronsen
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Rana Conway
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Phillippa Lally
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Anna Roberts
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Helen Croker
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Rebecca J Beeken
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Abigail Fisher
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Krogsgaard M, Kristensen HØ, Furnée EJB, Verkuijl SJ, Rama NJ, Domingos H, Maciel J, Solis-Peña A, Espín-Basany E, Hidalgo-Pujol M, Biondo S, Sjövall A, Emmertsen KJ, Thyø A, Christensen P. Life with a stoma across five European countries-a cross-sectional study on long-term rectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:8969-8979. [PMID: 35930059 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07293-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stoma-related problems are known to be important to patients and potentially affect everyday life. The prevalence of stoma-related problems in rectal cancer survivors remains undetermined. This study aimed to examine aspects of life with a long-term stoma, stoma management, and stoma-related problems and explore the impact of stoma-related problems on daily life. METHODS In total, 2262 patients from 5 European countries completed a multidimensional survey. Stoma-related problems were assessed using the Colostomy Impact score. Multivariable regression analysis, after adjusting for potential confounding factors, provided odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for stoma-related problems' association with restrictions in daily life. RESULTS The 2262 rectal cancer survivors completed the questionnaire at a median of 5.4 years (interquartile range 3.8-7.6) after stoma formation. In the total sample, leakage (58%) and troublesome odour (55%) were most prevalent followed by skin problems (27%) and pain (21%). Stoma-related problems were more prevalent in patients with parastomal bulging. A total of 431 (19%) reported feeling restricted in daily activities in life with a stoma. Leakage, odour, skin problems, stool consistency, and frequent appliance changes were significantly associated with restrictions in daily life. The highest risk of experiencing restrictions was seen for patients having odour (OR 2.74 [95% CI: 1.99-3.78]) more than once a week and skin problems (OR 1.77 [95% CI: 1.38-2.27]). CONCLUSION In this large cohort with rectal cancer, stoma-related problems were highly prevalent and impacted daily life. Supportive care strategies should entail outreach to patients with a long-term stoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Krogsgaard
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Lykkebækvej 1, 4600, Koege, Denmark.
| | - Helle Ø Kristensen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research On Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Edgar J B Furnée
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Sanne J Verkuijl
- Department of Surgery, Division of Abdominal Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nuno José Rama
- Surgery - Colorectal Unit, Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
| | - Hugo Domingos
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - João Maciel
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Instituto Português de Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alejandro Solis-Peña
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eloy Espín-Basany
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, General Surgery Department, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Hidalgo-Pujol
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,University of Barcelona and IBIDELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Investigation Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sebastiano Biondo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,University of Barcelona and IBIDELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Investigation Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Annika Sjövall
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katrine J Emmertsen
- Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research On Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Randers, Randers, Denmark
| | - Anne Thyø
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research On Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital Randers, Randers, Denmark
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Centre for Research On Survivorship and Late Adverse Effects After Cancer in the Pelvic Organs, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cross AJ, Robbins EC, Pack K, Stenson I, Kirby PL, Patel B, Rutter MD, Veitch AM, Saunders BP, Little M, Gray A, Duffy SW, Wooldrage K. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-156. [PMID: 35635015 DOI: 10.3310/olue3796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonoscopy surveillance is recommended for some patients post polypectomy. The 2002 UK surveillance guidelines classify post-polypectomy patients into low, intermediate and high risk, and recommend different strategies for each classification. Limited evidence supports these guidelines. OBJECTIVES To examine, for each risk group, long-term colorectal cancer incidence by baseline characteristics and the number of surveillance visits; the effects of interval length on detection rates of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer at first surveillance; and the cost-effectiveness of surveillance compared with no surveillance. DESIGN A retrospective cohort study and economic evaluation. SETTING Seventeen NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Patients with a colonoscopy and at least one adenoma at baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Long-term colorectal cancer incidence after baseline and detection rates of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer at first surveillance. DATA SOURCES Hospital databases, NHS Digital, the Office for National Statistics, National Services Scotland and Public Health England. METHODS Cox regression was used to compare colorectal cancer incidence in the presence and absence of surveillance and to identify colorectal cancer risk factors. Risk factors were used to stratify risk groups into higher- and lower-risk subgroups. We examined detection rates of advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer at first surveillance by interval length. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance compared with no surveillance was evaluated in terms of incremental costs per colorectal cancer prevented and per quality-adjusted life-year gained. RESULTS Our study included 28,972 patients, of whom 14,401 (50%), 11,852 (41%) and 2719 (9%) were classed as low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. The median follow-up time was 9.3 years. Colorectal cancer incidence was 140, 221 and 366 per 100,000 person-years among low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. Attendance at one surveillance visit was associated with reduced colorectal cancer incidence among low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients [hazard ratios were 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.80), 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.43 to 0.81) and 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.82), respectively]. Compared with the general population, colorectal cancer incidence without surveillance was similar among low-risk patients and higher among high-risk patients [standardised incidence ratios were 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.02) and 1.91 (95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.56), respectively]. For intermediate-risk patients, standardised incidence ratios differed for the lower- (0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.99) and higher-risk (1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 1.78) subgroups. In each risk group, incremental costs per colorectal cancer prevented and per quality-adjusted life-year gained with surveillance were lower for the higher-risk subgroup than for the lower-risk subgroup. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained were lowest for the higher-risk subgroup of high-risk patients at £7821. LIMITATIONS The observational design means that we cannot assume that surveillance caused the reductions in cancer incidence. The fact that some cancer staging data were missing places uncertainty on our cost-effectiveness estimates. CONCLUSIONS Surveillance was associated with reduced colorectal cancer incidence in all risk groups. However, in low-risk patients and the lower-risk subgroup of intermediate-risk patients, colorectal cancer incidence was no higher than in the general population without surveillance, indicating that surveillance might not be necessary. Surveillance was most cost-effective for the higher-risk subgroup of high-risk patients. FUTURE WORK Studies should examine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of post-polypectomy surveillance without prior classification of patients into risk groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered as ISRCTN15213649. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 26. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J Cross
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Emma C Robbins
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kevin Pack
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Iain Stenson
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paula L Kirby
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bhavita Patel
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.,Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew M Veitch
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK
| | | | - Matthew Little
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alastair Gray
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephen W Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Kate Wooldrage
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Stamp E, Clarke G, Wright P, Velikova G, Crossfield SSR, Zucker K, McInerney C, Bojke C, Martin A, Baxter P, Woroncow B, Wilson D, Warrington L, Absolom K, Burke D, Stables GI, Mitra A, Hutson R, Glaser AW, Hall G. Collection of cancer Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) to link with primary and secondary electronic care records to understand and improve long term cancer outcomes: A protocol paper. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266804. [PMID: 35427401 PMCID: PMC9012381 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction More people are living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis. There is limited understanding of the long-term effects of cancer and cancer treatment on quality of life and personal and household finances when compared to people without cancer. In a separate protocol we have proposed to link de-identified data from electronic primary care and hospital records for a large population of cancer survivors and matched controls. In this current protocol, we propose the linkage of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures data to the above data for a subset of this population. The aim of this study is to investigate the full impact of living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis compared to age and gender matched controls. A secondary aim is to test the feasibility of the collection of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMS) data and the linkage procedures of the PROMs data to electronic health records data. Materials and methods This is a cross-sectional study, aiming to recruit participants treated at the Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust. Eligible patients will be cancer survivors at around 5 years post-diagnosis (breast, colorectal and ovarian cancer) and non-cancer patient matched controls attending dermatology out-patient clinics. They will be identified by running a query on the Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust patient records system. Approximately 6000 patients (2000 cases and 4000 controls) will be invited to participate via post. Participants will be invited to complete PROMs assessing factors such as quality of life and finances, which can be completed on paper or online (surveys includes established instruments, and bespoke instruments (demographics, financial costs). This PROMs data will then be linked to routinely collected de-identified data from patient’s electronic primary care and hospital records. Discussion This innovative work aims to create a truly ‘comprehensive patient record’ to provide a broad picture of what happens to cancer patients across their cancer pathway, and the long-term impact of cancer treatment. Comparisons can be made between the cases and controls, to identify the aspects of life that has had the greatest impact following a cancer diagnosis. The feasibility of linking PROMs data to electronic health records can also be assessed. This work can inform future support offered to people living with and beyond a cancer diagnosis, clinical practice, and future research methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Stamp
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- School of Sport, Exercise, and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Gemma Clarke
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Academic Unit of Palliative Care, University of Leeds School of Medicine, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Penny Wright
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kieran Zucker
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Chris Bojke
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Martin
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Baxter
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Barbara Woroncow
- PPI Member, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - David Wilson
- PPI Member, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Lorraine Warrington
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Absolom
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Dermot Burke
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Angana Mitra
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Hutson
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Adam W. Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Geoff Hall
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Khoo AM, Lau J, Loh X, Ng CW, Griva K, Tan K. Understanding the psychosocial impact of colorectal cancer on young-onset patients: A scoping review. Cancer Med 2022; 11:1688-1700. [PMID: 35150052 PMCID: PMC8986148 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The incidence of young-onset (<50 years) colorectal cancer (CRC) has been increasing internationally. The psychosocial experience of younger cancer patients is vastly different from older patients, especially in domains such as financial toxicity, body image, and sexual dysfunction. What is unknown is the cancer type-specific experience. The aim of the current scoping review was to examine (1) the psychosocial factors and/or outcomes associated with young-onset CRC and (2) other determinants that influences these outcomes. METHODS A systematic search was conducted on four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO) from inception to December 2020 using key terms and combinations. Primary literature that examined the psychosocial (e.g., quality-of-life, emotional, social, sexual) impact of young-onset CRC were included. RESULTS A total of 1389 records were assessed by four reviewers, with a total of seven studies meeting inclusion criteria (n = 5 quantitative, n = 1 qualitative and n = 1 case series). All studies indicated there was significant psychosocial impact in younger CRC patients, including emotional impact, social impact, physical burden, sexual impact, work impact, unmet needs, financial impact and global quality of life. Three studies explored other determinants that influenced the psychosocial experience and found that socioeconomic background (e.g., being female, lower education), CRC treatment (e.g., chemotherapy) and health status were associated with worse psychosocial impact. CONCLUSIONS Young-onset CRC patients face severe psychosocial impact unique to this age group, such as self-image and sexual impact. Social support services and resources needs to be uniquely tailored. More empirical investigations are required to understand its long-term impact and influence of other psychosocial domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athena Ming‐Gui Khoo
- Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Jerrald Lau
- Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public HealthNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Xin‐Sheng Loh
- Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Celeste Wen‐Ting Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| | - Konstadina Griva
- Lee Kong Chian School of MedicineNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
| | - Ker‐Kan Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Liu S, Jin J. Radiotherapy guidelines for rectal cancer in China (2020 Edition). PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/pro6.1141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shixin Liu
- Radiation Oncology Society of Chinese Medical Doctor Association China
- Radiation Oncology Society of Chinese Medical Association China
- Cancer Radiotherapy Committee of Anti‐cancer Association of China China
| | - Jing Jin
- Radiation Oncology Society of Chinese Medical Doctor Association China
- Radiation Oncology Society of Chinese Medical Association China
- Cancer Radiotherapy Committee of Anti‐cancer Association of China China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Oyama O, Park DH, Lee MK, Byeon JY, Lee EB, Chung JY, Jung HJ, Park J, Kim T, Jee SH, Kim NK, Jeon JY. Characteristics of Defecation Function Related Quality of Life According to Cancer Location in Colorectal Cancer Survivors. ASIAN ONCOLOGY NURSING 2022. [DOI: 10.5388/aon.2022.22.4.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Okimitsu Oyama
- BS, Department of Sports Industry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Hyuk Park
- MS, Department of Sports Industry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Kyung Lee
- Ph.D, Department of Sports Industry, Yonsei University · Frontier Research Institute of Convergence Sports Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji-yong Byeon
- Ph.D., Department of Sports Industry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Byeol Lee
- MS, Department of Sports Industry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Youn Chung
- Ph.D., Department of Sports Industry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Jeong Jung
- MS, Department of Nursing, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jisu Park
- Prof., Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Taeil Kim
- Prof., Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Ha Jee
- Prof., Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Institute for Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nam Kyu Kim
- Prof., Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Justin Y Jeon
- Prof., Department of Sports Industry, Yonsei University · Exercise Medicine Center for Diabetes and Cancer Patients, ICONS, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jervoise N Andreyev H, Matthews J, Adams C, Gothard L, Lucy C, Tovey H, Boyle S, Anbalagan S, Musallam A, Yarnold J, Abraham D, Bliss J, Ahmed Abdi B, Taylor A, Hauer-Jensen M. Randomised single centre double-blind placebo controlled phase II trial of Tocovid SupraBio in combination with pentoxifylline in patients suffering long-term gastrointestinal adverse effects of radiotherapy for pelvic cancer: the PPALM study. Radiother Oncol 2022; 168:130-137. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
40
|
Mason SJ, Downing A, Wilding S, Hounsome L, Wright P, Watson E, Wagland R, Butcher H, Kind P, Selby P, Gavin A, Glaser AW. Stability of health-related quality of life and morbidity burden from 18 months after diagnosis of prostate cancer: results of a UK-wide population-based outcome cohort. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:3151-3164. [PMID: 34904181 PMCID: PMC8857149 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06650-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the dynamic nature of self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQL) and morbidity burden in men diagnosed with prostate cancer, we performed a follow-up study of the Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD) study cohort 12 months after initial survey. Methods The LAPCD study collected information from 35,823 men across the UK who were 18–42 months post-diagnosis of prostate cancer. Men who were still alive 12 months later were resurveyed. Generic HRQL (EQ-5D-5L plus self-assessed health rating) and prostate cancer-specific outcomes (EPIC-26) were assessed. Treatment(s) received was self-reported. Previously defined clinically meaningful differences were used to evaluate changes in outcomes over time. Results A total of 28,450 men across all disease stages completed follow-up surveys (85.8% response). Of the 21,700 included in this study, 89.7% reported no additional treatments since the first survey. This group experienced stable urinary and bowel outcomes, with good function for most men at both time points. On-going poor (but stable) urinary issues were associated with previous surgery. Sexual function scores remained low (mean: 26.8/100). Self-assessed health ratings were stable over time. The largest declines in HRQL and functional outcomes were experienced by men reporting their first active treatment between surveys. Discussion The results suggest stability of HRQL and most specific morbidities by 18–42 months for men who report no further treatment in the subsequent 12 months. This is reassuring for those with good function and HRQL but re-enforces the need for early intervention and support for men who experience poor outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-021-06650-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha J Mason
- School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. .,Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Level 11, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
| | - Sarah Wilding
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Penny Wright
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Eila Watson
- Oxford Institute of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Research, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Wagland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Hugh Butcher
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Kind
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Selby
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Adam W Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.,Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Level 11, Worsley Building, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kuzmanovska B, Kuzmanovski I, Jankulovski N, Kartalov A, Osmani B, Srceva M, Brzanov N, Gavrilovska -Brzanov A. Patient-reported health-related quality of life after colorectal surgery. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY 2021; 94:20-26. [DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.5540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
<b>Introduction:</b> Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. In most of these patients, quality of life is deteriorated. </br></br> <b>Aim:</b> The aim of our study was to analyze how the disease affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to examine the role of demographic, disease-related, and other factors in the overall quality of life. The second aim was to identify areas where HRQoL could be improved. </br></br> <b> Material and methods:</b> A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted. The study included a modified version of EQ-5D, as well as clinical and socioeconomic characteristics of the country. Patients over the age of 18, who had colorectar surgery, and were followed up at our clinic, were included in the survey. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> In patients after colorectal surgery, bowel control is a major concern that has an impact on their quality of life. The majority of patients expressed gratitude for the care they received and thanked the health-care providers for it. With the EQ-5D modified questionnaire, the concept of "perfect" health was reviewed and analyzed. A response "no difficulty" in any of the five domains was classified as perfect health. Only one-third of the patients said their health was “ideal” (no problems in any of the EQ-5D five domains). </br></br> <b>Discussion:</b> According to the results of this study, patients with CRC have considerably poorer HRQoL than the general population, as indicated by the EQ-5D utility scores. This discovery is in line with some previous research. </br></br> <b>Conclusion:</b> Colorectal surgery survivors' total HRQoL has been found to be lower than in the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biljana Kuzmanovska
- University Clinic for Traumatology, Orthopedic Disease, Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Igor Kuzmanovski
- University Clinic for Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Nikola Jankulovski
- University Clinic for Abdominal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Andrijan Kartalov
- University Clinic for Traumatology, Orthopedic Disease, Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Bujar Osmani
- University Clinic for Abdominal Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Marija Srceva
- University Clinic for Traumatology, Orthopedic Disease, Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Nikola Brzanov
- University Clinic for Traumatology, Orthopedic Disease, Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| | - Aleksandra Gavrilovska -Brzanov
- University Clinic for Traumatology, Orthopedic Disease, Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, R. Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Genetic Testing. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18168330. [PMID: 34444091 PMCID: PMC8394708 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Approximately 3–5% of CRCs are associated with hereditary cancer syndromes. Individuals who harbor germline mutations are at an increased risk of developing early onset CRC, as well as extracolonic tumors. Genetic testing can identify genes that cause these syndromes. Early detection could facilitate the initiation of targeted prevention strategies and surveillance for CRC patients and their families. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of CRC genetic testing. We utilized a cross-sectional design to determine the cost-effectiveness of CRC genetic testing as compared to the usual screening method (iFOBT) from the provider’s perspective. Data on costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of 200 CRC patients from three specialist general hospitals were collected. A mixed-methods approach of activity-based costing, top-down costing, and extracted information from a clinical pathway was used to estimate provider costs. Patients and family members’ HRQoL were measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Data from the Malaysian Study on Cancer Survival (MySCan) were used to calculate patient survival. Cost-effectiveness was measured as cost per life-year (LY) and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The provider cost for CRC genetic testing was high as compared to that for the current screening method. The current practice for screening is cost-saving as compared to genetic testing. Using a 10-year survival analysis, the estimated number of LYs gained for CRC patients through genetic testing was 0.92 years, and the number of QALYs gained was 1.53 years. The cost per LY gained and cost per QALY gained were calculated. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) showed that genetic testing dominates iFOBT testing. CRC genetic testing is cost-effective and could be considered as routine CRC screening for clinical practice.
Collapse
|
43
|
Downing A, Hall P, Birch R, Lemmon E, Affleck P, Rossington H, Boldison E, Ewart P, Morris EJA. Data Resource Profile: The COloRECTal cancer data repository (CORECT-R). Int J Epidemiol 2021; 50:1418-1418k. [PMID: 34255059 PMCID: PMC8580263 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Downing
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Hall
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.,Edinburgh Health Economics, University of Edinburgh, NINE BioQuarter, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rebecca Birch
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Elizabeth Lemmon
- Edinburgh Health Economics, University of Edinburgh, NINE BioQuarter, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Paul Affleck
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hannah Rossington
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Emily Boldison
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Ewart
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Eva J A Morris
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Catto JWF, Downing A, Mason S, Wright P, Absolom K, Bottomley S, Hounsome L, Hussain S, Varughese M, Raw C, Kelly P, Glaser AW. Quality of Life After Bladder Cancer: A Cross-sectional Survey of Patient-reported Outcomes. Eur Urol 2021; 79:621-632. [PMID: 33581875 PMCID: PMC8082273 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following treatment for bladder cancer (BC). OBJECTIVE To determine this, we undertook a cross-sectional survey covering 10% of the English population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Participants 1-10 yr from diagnosis were identified through national cancer registration data. INTERVENTION A postal survey was administered containing generic HRQOL and BC-specific outcome measures. Findings were compared with those of the general population and other pelvic cancer patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Generic HRQOL was measured using five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30. BC-specific outcomes were derived from EORTC QLQ-BLM30 and EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 1796 surveys were completed (response rate 55%), including 868 (48%) patients with non-muscle-invasive BC, 893 (50%) patients who received radiotherapy or radical cystectomy, and 35 (1.9%) patients for whom treatment was unknown. Most (69%) of the participants reported at least one problem in any EQ-5D dimension. Age/sex-adjusted generic HRQOL outcomes were similar across all stages and treatment groups, whilst problems increased with age (problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions: <65 yr [67% {95% confidence interval or CI: 61-74}] vs 85+ yr [84% {95% CI: 81-89}], p = 0.016) and long-term conditions (no conditions [53% {95% CI: 48-58}] vs more than four conditions [94% {95% CI: 90-97}], p < 0.001). Sexual problems were reported commonly in men, increasing with younger age and radical treatment. Younger participants (under 65 yr) reported more financial difficulties (mean score 20 [95% CI: 16-25]) than those aged 85+ yr (6.8 [4.5-9.2], p < 0.001). HRQOL for BC patients (for comparison, males with problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions 69% [95% CI: 66-72]) was significantly worse than what has been found after colorectal and prostate cancers and in the general population (51% [95% CI: 48-53], all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS HRQOL following BC appears to be relatively independent of disease stage, treatment, and multimodal care. Issues are reported with sexual function and financial toxicity. HRQOL after BC is worse than that after other pelvic cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients living with bladder cancer often have reduced quality of life, which may be worse than that for other common pelvic cancer patients. Age and other illnesses appear to be more important in determining this quality of life than the treatments received. Many men complain of sexual problems. Younger patients have financial worries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Department of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Samantha Mason
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Penny Wright
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kate Absolom
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Bottomley
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Luke Hounsome
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK
| | - Syed Hussain
- Academic Oncology Unit, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mohini Varughese
- Beacon Oncology Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Somerset Foundation Trust, Somerset, UK
| | | | | | - Adam W Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's and Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Chen HH, Lu CC. Safety and efficacy of oxycodone in cancer patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain: A single-medical center experiences. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.4103/jcrp.jcrp_15_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
46
|
Malcolm FL, Adiamah A, Banerjea A, Whitehead D, Gupta A, West J, Humes DJ. Long-term health-related quality of life following colorectal cancer surgery: patient-reported outcomes in a remote follow-up population. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:213-225. [PMID: 33021013 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
AIM Remote follow-up (RFU) after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery allows delivery of surveillance tests without the need for regular outpatient clinical appointments. However, little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in RFU patients. The main aim of this study was to quantify HRQoL in our RFU population to identify particular patient groups that may benefit from a more personalised approach to follow-up, including access to a survivorship clinic. METHOD EQ-5D, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-C29 questionnaires were distributed to CRC patients enrolled in a RFU programme. The primary outcome of HRQoL scores was analysed by year of RFU, demographics, operation type, stoma and adherence to RFU protocols. RESULTS A total of 428 respondents were included, with a mean age of 71 years (SD 10.1 years) and a median RFU time of 2.6 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-4.8 years]. 'Perfect health' was reported by 26.6% of patients. The median EQ-5D index score was 0.785 (IQR 0.671-1) and the median QLQ-C30 Global HRQoL score was 75 (IQR 58.3-83.3). Women had a significantly lower EQ-5D median score of 0.767 (IQR 0.666-0.879, P = 0.0088). Lower QLQ-C30 HRQoL scores were seen in stoma patients (median 66.6, IQR 58.3-83.3, P = 0.0029). Erectile dysfunction (P = 0.0006) and poor body image (P = 0.001) were also reported more frequently in stoma patients. Patients undergoing right-sided resection reported a lower median EQ-5D score of 0.765 (IQR 0.666-0.879, P = 0.028) and higher pain severity (P = 0.0367) compared with left-sided resections. There were 128 (29.4%) patients who breached RFU protocol and were seen in ad hoc colorectal clinics. However, there was no statistical difference in HRQoL between patients who adhered to or breached RFU protocols. CONCLUSION Overall HRQoL in patients in RFU is good, with no difference in those strictly followed up remotely. However, women, patients with right-sided resection and patients with a stoma may require additional clinical reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Ligori Malcolm
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alfred Adiamah
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ayan Banerjea
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Denyse Whitehead
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alisha Gupta
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Joe West
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.,Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David J Humes
- National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.,Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Joshy G, Thandrayen J, Koczwara B, Butow P, Laidsaar-Powell R, Rankin N, Canfell K, Stubbs J, Grogan P, Bailey L, Yazidjoglou A, Banks E. Disability, psychological distress and quality of life in relation to cancer diagnosis and cancer type: population-based Australian study of 22,505 cancer survivors and 244,000 people without cancer. BMC Med 2020; 18:372. [PMID: 33256726 PMCID: PMC7708114 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01830-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved survival means that cancer is increasingly becoming a chronic disease. Understanding and improving functional outcomes are critical to optimising survivorship. We quantified physical and mental health-related outcomes in people with versus without cancer, according to cancer type. METHODS Questionnaire data from an Australian population-based cohort study (45 and Up Study (n = 267,153)) were linked to cancer registration data to ascertain cancer diagnoses up to enrolment. Modified Poisson regression estimated age- and sex-adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) for adverse person-centred outcomes-severe physical functional limitations (disability), moderate/high psychological distress and fair/poor quality of life (QoL)-in participants with versus without cancer, for 13 cancer types. RESULTS Compared to participants without cancer (n = 244,000), cancer survivors (n = 22,505) had greater disability (20.6% versus 12.6%, respectively, PR = 1.28, 95%CI = (1.25-1.32)), psychological (22.2% versus 23.5%, 1.05 (1.02-1.08)) and poor/fair QoL (15.2% versus 10.2%; 1.28 (1.24-1.32)). The outcomes varied by cancer type, being worse for multiple myeloma (PRs versus participants without cancer for disability 3.10, 2.56-3.77; distress 1.53, 1.20-1.96; poor/fair QoL 2.40, 1.87-3.07), lung cancer (disability 2.81, 2.50-3.15; distress 1.67, 1.46-1.92; poor/fair QoL 2.53, 2.21-2.91) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (disability 1.56, 1.37-1.78; distress 1.20, 1.05-1.36; poor/fair QoL 1.66, 1.44-1.92) and closer to those in people without cancer for breast cancer (disability 1.23, 1.16-1.32; distress 0.95, 0.90-1.01; poor/fair QoL 1.15, 1.05-1.25), prostate cancer (disability 1.11, 1.04-1.19; distress 1.09, 1.02-1.15; poor/fair QoL 1.15, 1.08-1.23) and melanoma (disability 1.02, 0.94-1.10; distress 0.96, 0.89-1.03; poor/fair QoL 0.92, 0.83-1.01). Outcomes were worse with recent diagnosis and treatment and advanced stage. Physical disability in cancer survivors was greater in all population subgroups examined and was a major contributor to adverse distress and QoL outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Physical disability, distress and reduced QoL are common after cancer and vary according to cancer type suggesting priority areas for research, and care and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Joshy
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Mills Road, Acton, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
| | - Joanne Thandrayen
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Mills Road, Acton, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Bogda Koczwara
- Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Medicine, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Medicine, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole Rankin
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Medicine, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Medicine, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Kings Cross, NSW, Australia.,Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Paul Grogan
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council New South Wales, Kings Cross, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise Bailey
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group Community Advisory Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Psycho-oncology Cooperative Research Group Community Advisory Group, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Amelia Yazidjoglou
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Mills Road, Acton, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Emily Banks
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Mills Road, Acton, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.,Sax Institute, Haymarket, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Frankland J, Wheelwright S, Permyakova NV, Wright D, Collaço N, Calman L, Winter J, Fenlon D, Richardson A, Smith PW, Foster C. Prevalence and predictors of poor sexual well-being over 5 years following treatment for colorectal cancer: results from the ColoREctal Wellbeing (CREW) prospective longitudinal study. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038953. [PMID: 33184080 PMCID: PMC7662451 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe prevalence and predictors of poor sexual well-being for men and women over 5 years following treatment for colorectal cancer. DESIGN Prospective longitudinal study, from presurgery to 5 years postsurgery, with eight assessment points. Logistic regression models predicted sexual well-being from presurgery to 24 months and 24 months to 60 months; time-adjusted then fully adjusted models were constructed at each stage. SETTING Twenty-nine hospitals in the UK. PARTICIPANTS Patients with Dukes' stage A-C, treated with curative intent, aged ≥18 years and able to complete questionnaires were eligible. OUTCOME MEASURES The dependent variable was the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors sexual function score. Independent variables included sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial characteristics. RESULTS Seven hundred and ninety participants provided a sexual well-being score for at least one time point. Thirty-seven per cent of men and 14% of women reported poor sexual well-being at 5 years. Baseline predictors for men at 24 months included having a stoma (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.20) and high levels of depression (OR 2.69/2.01, 95% CI 1.68 to 4.32/1.12 to 3.61); men with high self-efficacy (OR confident 0.33/0.48, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.61/0.24 to 1.00; very confident 0.25/0.42, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.49/0.19 to 0.94) and social support (OR 0.52/0.56, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.81/0.35 to 0.91) were less likely to report poor sexual well-being. Predictors at 60 months included having a stoma (OR 2.30/2.67, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.34/1.11 to 6.40) and high levels of depression (OR 5.61/2.58, 95% CI 2.58 to 12.21/0.81 to 8.25); men with high self-efficacy (very confident 0.14, 95% CI 0.047 to 0.44), full social support (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.53) and higher quality of life (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98) were less likely to report poor sexual well-being. It was not possible to construct models for women due to low numbers reporting poor sexual well-being. CONCLUSIONS Several psychosocial variables were identified as predictors of poor sexual well-being among men. Interventions targeting low self-efficacy may be helpful. More research is needed to understand women's sexual well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Frankland
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Sally Wheelwright
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Natalia V Permyakova
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - David Wright
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nicole Collaço
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Lynn Calman
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jane Winter
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Deborah Fenlon
- College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Alison Richardson
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Peter W Smith
- Social Statistics and Demography, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Claire Foster
- Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hope C, Reilly J, Lund J, Andreyev H. Systematic review: the effect of right hemicolectomy for cancer on postoperative bowel function. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:4549-4559. [PMID: 32430603 PMCID: PMC7447648 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05519-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Right-sided cancer accounts for approximately 30% of bowel cancer in women and 22% in men. Colonic resection can cause changes in bowel function which affect daily activity. The aims are to assess the impact of right hemicolectomy for cancer on bowel function and to identify useful treatment modalities for managing bowel dysfunction after right hemicolectomy. METHOD The review was conducted in line with PRISMA. Eligible studies evaluated the impact of right hemicolectomy on bowel function in those treated for colorectal neoplasia or assessed the effect of surgical technique or other intervention on bowel function after right hemicolectomy. Right hemicolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease or benign cases only were excluded. Articles were limited to studies on human subjects written in English published between January 2008 and December 2018. RESULTS The searches identified 7531 articles. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria, of which eight were cohort studies and one was a randomised trial. Loose stool, increased bowel frequency and/or nocturnal defaecation following right-sided colectomy occurs in approximately one in five patients. Some of these symptoms may improve spontaneously with time. Bile acid malabsorption and/or small bowel bacterial overgrowth may be the cause for chronic dysfunction. Some studies report that no or little difference in outcome between right-sided and rectal resections likely suggests poor function after right-sided resection. CONCLUSION Right hemicolectomy can result in changes to bowel function. Patients should be counselled preoperatively, and follow-up should be designed to identify and effectively treat significantly altered bowel function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hope
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK.
| | - J Reilly
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - J Lund
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Royal Derby Hospital, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, DE22 3DT, UK
| | - Hjn Andreyev
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lincoln County Hospital, Greetwell Road, Lincoln, LN2 5QY, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Skandarajah AR, Lisy K, Ward A, Bishop J, Lacey K, Mann B, Jefford M. Patient-reported outcomes in survivors of breast cancer one, three, and five years post-diagnosis: a cancer registry-based feasibility study. Qual Life Res 2020; 30:385-394. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02652-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|