A high-throughput UPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of eight anti-tumor drugs in plasma

Rapidly developing UPLC-MS/MS bioassays with high throughput and quality are challenging yet desired in routine clinics. METHODS & RESULTS: A high-throughput UPLC-MS/MS bioassay has been built for simultaneously quantifying gefitinib, ruxolitinib, dasatinib, imatinib, ibrutinib, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel. After the protein precipitation with methanol, samples were separated on an Acquity BEH C₁₈ column following a gradient elution system with methanol and 2 mM ammonium acetate in water at 40 °C with a run time of 3 min (flow rate 0.4 mL/min). Mass quantification in the positive ion SRM mode was then performed with electrospray ionization. The method of specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, matrix effects, recovery, stability, dilution integrity and carryover were all validated as per the guideline of the China Food and Drug Administration whose values met the admissible limits. Application of the bioassay to therapeutic drug monitoring revealed important variability in the studied anti-tumour drugs. CONCLUSION: This validated approach was shown to be reliable and effective in clinical management, being a valuable support in therapeutic drug monitoring and subsequent individualized dosing optimization.

Treatment regimens of classical and newer taxanes

The classical taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), the newer taxane cabazitaxel and the nanoparticle-bound nab-paclitaxel are among the most widely used anticancer drugs. The taxanes share the characteristics of extensive hepatic metabolism and biliary excretion, the need for dose adaptation in patients with liver dysfunction, and a substantial pharmacokinetic variability even after taking into account known covariates. Data from clinical studies suggest that optimal scheduling of the taxanes is dependent not only on the specific taxane compound, but also on the tumor type and line of treatment. Still, the optimal dosing regimen (weekly vs 3 weekly) and optimal dose of the taxanes are controversial, as is the value of pharmacological personalization of taxane dosing. In this article, an overview is given on the pharmacological properties of the taxanes, including metabolism, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics and aspects in the clinical use of taxanes. The latter includes the ongoing debate on the most active and safe regimen, the recommended initial dose and the issue of therapeutic drug dosing.

Personalizing chemotherapy dosing using pharmacological methods

PURPOSE

Given the toxic nature and narrow therapeutic index of traditional chemotherapeutics, better methods of dose and therapy selection are critical. Pharmacological methods, including pharmacogenomics and pharmacokinetics, offer a practical method to enrich drug exposure, reduce toxicity, and improve quality of life for patients.

METHODS

PubMed and key abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) were searched until July 2015 for clinical data relating to pharmacogenomic- and/or pharmacokinetic-guided dosing of anticancer drugs.

RESULTS

Based on the results returned from a thorough search of the literature and the plausibility of utilizing pharmacogenomic and/or pharmacokinetic methods to personalize chemotherapy dosing, we identified several chemotherapeutic agents with the potential for therapy individualization. We highlight the available data, clinical validity, and utility of using pharmacogenomics to personalize therapy for tamoxifen, 5-fluorouracil, mercaptopurine, and irinotecan, in addition to using pharmacokinetics to personalize dosing for 5-fluorouracil, busulfan, methotrexate, taxanes, and topotecan.

CONCLUSION

A concerted effort should be made by researchers to further elucidate the role of pharmacological methods in personalizing chemotherapy dosing to optimize the risk-benefit profile. Clinicians should be aware of the clinical validity, utility, and availability of pharmacogenomic- and pharmacokinetic-guided therapies in clinical practice, to ultimately allow optimal dosing for each and every cancer patient.