Next generation sequencing-based gene panel tests for the management of solid tumors

Next generation sequencing (NGS) has been an invaluable tool to put genomic sequencing into clinical practice. The incorporation of clinically relevant target sequences into NGS-based gene panel tests has generated practical diagnostic tools that enable individualized cancer-patient care. The clinical utility of gene panel testing includes investigation of the genetic basis for an individual's response to therapy, such as signaling pathways associated with a response to specific therapies, microsatellite instability and a hypermutated phenotype, and deficiency in the DNA double-strand break repair pathway. In this review, we describe the concept of precision cancer medicine using target sequences in gene panel tests as well as the importance of the control of sample quality in routine NGS-based genomic testing. We describe geographic and ethnic differences in cancer genomes, and discuss issues that need to be addressed in the future based on our experiences in Japan.

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sample conditions for deep next generation sequencing

INTRODUCTION

Precision medicine is only possible in oncology practice if targetable genes in fragmented DNA, such as DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, can be sequenced using next generation sequencing (NGS). The aim of this study was to examine the quality and quantity of DNA from FFPE cancerous tissue samples from surgically resected and biopsy specimens.

METHODS

DNA was extracted from unstained FFPE tissue sections prepared from surgically resected specimens of breast, colorectal and gastric cancer, and biopsy specimens of breast cancer. A total quantity of DNA ≥60 ng from a sample was considered adequate for NGS. The DNA quality was assessed by Q-ratios, with a Q-ratio >0.1 considered sufficient for NGS.

RESULTS

The Q-ratio for DNA from FFPE tissue processed with neutral-buffered formalin was significantly better than that processed with unbuffered formalin. All Q-ratios for DNA from breast, colorectal and gastric cancer samples indicated DNA levels sufficient for NGS. DNA extracted from gastric cancer FFPE samples prepared within the last 7 years is suitable for NGS analysis, whereas those older than 7 years may not be suitable. Our data suggested that adequate amounts of DNA can be extracted from FFPE samples, not only of surgically resected tissue but also of biopsy specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of formalin used for fixation and the time since FFPE sample preparation affect DNA quality. Sufficient amounts of DNA can be extracted from FFPE samples of both surgically resected and biopsy tissue, thus expanding the potential diagnostic uses of NGS in a clinical setting.