1
|
Chawla A, Wo J, Castillo CFD, Ferrone CR, Ryan DP, Hong TS, Blaszkowsky LS, Lillemoe KD, Qadan M. Clinical staging in pancreatic adenocarcinoma underestimates extent of disease. Pancreatology 2020; 20:691-697. [PMID: 32222341 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES We sought to identify the reliability of AJCC clinical staging was in comparison to pathologic staging in surgically resected patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS We used the National Cancer Database Pancreas from 2004 to 2016 and evaluated patients who underwent resection for PDAC with all documented components of clinical and pathologic stage. We first evaluated the distribution of overall clinical stage and pathologic stage and then evaluated for stage migration by assessing the number of patients who shifted from a clinical stage group to a respective pathologic stage group. To further characterize the migratory pattern, we assessed the distribution of clinical and pathologic T-stage and N-stage. RESULTS In our cohort of 28,338 patients who underwent resection for PDAC, AJCC clinical staging did not reliably predict pathologic stage. Stage migration after resection was responsible for discrepancies between the distribution of overall clinical stage and pathologic stage. The predominant migration was from patients with clinical stage I disease to pathologic stage II disease. Most patients with clinical T1 and T2 disease were upstaged to pathologic T3 disease and over half of patients with clinical N0 disease were upstaged to pathologic N1 disease after resection. DISCUSSION Clinical staging appears to overrepresent early T1, T2, and N0 disease, and underrepresent T3 and N1 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akhil Chawla
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Medicine Regional Medical Group, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jennifer Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David P Ryan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Vernon Cancer Center, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, 2014 Washington Street, Newton, MA, 02462, USA
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Vernon Cancer Center, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, 2014 Washington Street, Newton, MA, 02462, USA
| | - Keith D Lillemoe
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Motaz Qadan
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Vernon Cancer Center, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, 2014 Washington Street, Newton, MA, 02462, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neoadjuvant treatment for borderline and resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 19:1193-1198. [PMID: 28612203 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1680-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Nowadays and given the improvement in response rate with the new schemes of treatment with chemotherapy, the interest in neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, allowing the early application of systemic therapies, has also increased. However, treatment selection fundamentally depends on decisions taken by multidisciplinary committees due to the absence of randomized trials on this indication and because the available evidence is based primarily on small studies. The present manuscript tries to establish recommendations based on the available evidence and expert opinion to correctly select the indication, the type of treatment, as well as its duration and how to correctly follow-up patients during treatment with chemotherapy.
Collapse
|