Social isolation and health among family caregivers of older adults: Less community participation may indicate poor self-reported health

Social isolation is associated with adverse health outcomes in the general older adult population, but little is known about indicators of social isolation in family caregiver populations. This cross-sectional study examined the prevalence of social isolation in the 2015 National Survey of Caregiving. Using the Convoy Model of social relations, a life-course social support framework, we also examined associations between social isolation and caregiver self-reported health. Using multiple ordinal logistic regression models, we examined social isolation - operationalised with a five-item summative measure and, alternatively, with each social isolation item - as a predictor of self-reported general health status. On the dichotomised summative measure, 24.74% (n = 2,175) were more isolated. Younger caregivers were more isolated (M = 56.77 years, SE = 0.76) compared with those who were not (M = 60.86 years, SE = 0.41). Self-reported general health was as follows: 4.93% poor; 15.67% fair; 25.62% good; 34.81% very good and 18.97% excellent. Less social isolation was associated with higher odds of better self-reported health (Adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.19; CI = 1.05-1.35). Of the individual social isolation indicators, only a lack of community participation was associated with higher odds of worse self-reported health (AOR = 1.57; CI = 1.25-1.97). Social isolation and particularly community participation were associated with caregiver health status. It may be necessary for healthcare providers to consider these factors in caregiver health assessments. Future research is recommended to understand the consequences of various social isolation indicators in diverse samples including younger caregivers.

Posttraumatic growth and life course stress predict dyadic wellbeing among sexual and gender minority (SGM) and non-SGM couples facing cancer

OBJECTIVE

This study examined: (1) Differences among sexual and gender minority (SGM) and non-SGM couples' life course stress, posttraumatic growth (PTG), individual, and dyadic wellbeing while facing cancer, (2) The predictive ability of PTG and life course stress on wellbeing for each dyad member, and (3) The predictive ability of dyad-level PTG and dyad-level life course stress on dyadic wellbeing.

METHODS

Thirty SGM and 30 non-SGM dyads (N = 60) completed measures assessing demographics, life course stress, PTG, individual, and dyadic wellbeing. Regression and multilevel models tested predictive hypotheses.

RESULTS

Participants were 56.3 years old on average (SD = 13.6) and were together for 24.2 (SD = 14.9) years. SGM participants reported greater life course stress and higher scores on the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) than non-SGM participants. A dyad members' higher PTG predicted their partners' higher DASS-21 score, dyad members' higher life course stress predicted their own higher DASS-21 score, and patients' higher life course stress predicted their partners' higher DASS-21 score. Greater dyadic PTG predicted greater dyadic wellbeing.

CONCLUSIONS

SGM and non-SGM couples experience PTG equally despite SGM couples' greater life course stress and higher DASS-21 scores. Future research is needed to explore how PTG may affect individuals and couples differently.