|
1
|
Lee-Ying R, Ahmed O, Ahmed S, Ahmed S, Bathe OF, Brunet B, Dawson L, Davies J, Gordon V, Hebbard P, Kasnik J, Kim CA, Le D, Lee MKC, Lim H, McGhie JP, Mulder K, Park J, Renouf D, Tam V, Visser R, Wong RPW, Zaidi A, Doll C. Report from the 21st Annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Calgary, Alberta; 20-21 September 2019. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3629-3648. [PMID: 34590606 PMCID: PMC8482207 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The 21st annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference (WCGCCC) was held in Calgary, Alberta, 20-21 September 2019. The WCGCCC is an interactive multi-disciplinary conference attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and allied health care professionals such as dietitians and nurses participated in presentation and discussion sessions to develop the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Lee-Ying
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Service, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (V.T.); (C.D.)
| | - Osama Ahmed
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (O.A.); (S.A.); (B.B.); (D.L.); (A.Z.)
| | - Shahid Ahmed
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (O.A.); (S.A.); (B.B.); (D.L.); (A.Z.)
| | - Shahida Ahmed
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; (S.A.); (V.G.); (P.H.); (C.A.K.); (J.P.); (R.P.W.W.)
| | - Oliver F. Bathe
- Surgical Oncology, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada;
| | - Bryan Brunet
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (O.A.); (S.A.); (B.B.); (D.L.); (A.Z.)
| | - Laura Dawson
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada;
| | - Janine Davies
- Department of Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (J.D.); (M.K.C.L.); (H.L.); (D.R.)
| | - Valerie Gordon
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; (S.A.); (V.G.); (P.H.); (C.A.K.); (J.P.); (R.P.W.W.)
| | - Pamela Hebbard
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; (S.A.); (V.G.); (P.H.); (C.A.K.); (J.P.); (R.P.W.W.)
| | - Jessica Kasnik
- Cross Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5G 1Z2, Canada; (J.K.); (K.M.)
| | - Christina A. Kim
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; (S.A.); (V.G.); (P.H.); (C.A.K.); (J.P.); (R.P.W.W.)
| | - Duc Le
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (O.A.); (S.A.); (B.B.); (D.L.); (A.Z.)
| | - Michael K. C. Lee
- Department of Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (J.D.); (M.K.C.L.); (H.L.); (D.R.)
| | - Howard Lim
- Department of Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (J.D.); (M.K.C.L.); (H.L.); (D.R.)
| | - John Paul McGhie
- Department of Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC V8R 4S1, Canada;
| | - Karen Mulder
- Cross Cancer Institute, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB T5G 1Z2, Canada; (J.K.); (K.M.)
| | - Jason Park
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; (S.A.); (V.G.); (P.H.); (C.A.K.); (J.P.); (R.P.W.W.)
| | - Daniel Renouf
- Department of Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (J.D.); (M.K.C.L.); (H.L.); (D.R.)
| | - Vincent Tam
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Service, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (V.T.); (C.D.)
| | - Robin Visser
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada;
| | - Ralph P. W. Wong
- Department of Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada; (S.A.); (V.G.); (P.H.); (C.A.K.); (J.P.); (R.P.W.W.)
| | - Adnan Zaidi
- Saskatoon Cancer Center, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada; (O.A.); (S.A.); (B.B.); (D.L.); (A.Z.)
| | - Corinne Doll
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Service, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada; (V.T.); (C.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Hayuka K, Okuyama H, Murakami A, Okita Y, Nishiuchi T, Okano K, Suzuki Y, Tsuji A. Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy following FOLFIRINOX in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Institution, Retrospective Analysis. Chemotherapy 2021; 66:58-64. [PMID: 34284397 DOI: 10.1159/000517244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have a poor prognosis. FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been established as first-line treatment, but they have not been confirmed as second-line treatment after FFX. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GnP as second-line therapy after FFX in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS Twenty-five patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were enrolled. The patients were treated with GnP after FFX between September 2015 and September 2019. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS The response rate, disease control rate, median PFS, and median OS were 12%, 96%, 5.3 months, and 15.6 months, respectively. The common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (76%) and anemia (16%). CONCLUSIONS GnP after FOLFIRINOX is expected to be one of the second-line recommendations for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kotone Hayuka
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan,
| | - Hiroyuki Okuyama
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Akitsu Murakami
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Okita
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Takamasa Nishiuchi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Keiichi Okano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Akihito Tsuji
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
de Jesus VHF, Camandaroba MPG, Calsavara VF, Riechelmann RP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920905408. [PMID: 32165927 PMCID: PMC7052451 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920905408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are no randomized data to guide treatment decisions for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma following first-line FOLFIRINOX. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX to assess treatment efficacy and toxicity. Methods We included studies published between 2011 and 2018 that evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy after FOLFIRINOX in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), any grade 3/4 toxicity rate, and progression-free survival (PFS). We used the random-effects model to generate pooled estimates for proportions. Results Sixteen studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, ORR was 10.8%, DCR was 41.1%, and any grade 3/4 toxicity rate was 28.6%. In subgroup analyses, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with superior ORR (14.4 versus 8.4%; p = 0.038) and DCR (53.5 versus 30.5%; p < 0.001) compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Median PFS ranged from 1.9 to 6.4 months and numerically favored gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Conclusions Our study suggests gemcitabine-based chemotherapy likely outperforms best supportive care after FOLFIRINOX in advanced pancreatic cancer. Also, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel seems to be more active than single-agent gemcitabine (CRD42018100421).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor H F de Jesus
- Medical Oncology Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, Rua Prof. Antônio Prudente, 211, São Paulo, 01509-010, Brazil
| | | | - Vinicius F Calsavara
- Department of Epidemiology and Statistics - International Research Center (CIPE), A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|