1
|
Kirchweger P, Wundsam HV, Rumpold H. Circulating tumor DNA for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:473-484. [PMID: 35949436 PMCID: PMC9244970 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i6.473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in peripheral blood or other body fluids of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies via liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising biomarker. This is urgently needed, as conventional imaging and plasma protein-derived biomarkers lack sensitivity and specificity in prognosis, early detection of relapse or treatment monitoring. This review summarizes the potential role of liquid biopsy in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring of gastrointestinal malignancies, including upper gastrointestinal, liver, bile duct, pancreatic and colorectal cancer. CtDNA can now be part of the clinical routine as a promising, highly sensitive and specific biomarker with a broad range of applicability. Liquid-biopsy based postoperative relapse prediction could lead to improved survival by intensification of adjuvant treatment in patients identified to be at risk of early recurrence. Moreover, ctDNA allows monitoring of antineoplastic treatment success, with identification of potentially developed resistance or therapeutic targets during the course of treatment. It may also assist in early change of chemotherapy in metastatic gastrointestinal malignancies prior to imaging findings of relapse. Nevertheless, clinical utility is dependent on the tumor’s entity and burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Kirchweger
- Department of Surgery, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz 4010, Austria
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz 4010, Austria
- Medical Faculty, JKU University Linz, Linz 4040, Austria
| | | | - Holger Rumpold
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz 4010, Austria
- Medical Faculty, JKU University Linz, Linz 4040, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
The Impact of Biomarkers in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma on Diagnosis, Surveillance and Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14010217. [PMID: 35008381 PMCID: PMC8750069 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Due to the frequently late diagnosis, early metastasis and high therapy resistance curation is rare and prognosis remains poor overall. To provide early diagnostic and therapeutic predictors, various molecules from blood, tissue and other origin e.g., saliva, urine and stool, have been identified as biomarkers. This review summarizes current trends in biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still difficult to treat due to insufficient methods for early diagnosis and prediction of therapy response. Furthermore, surveillance after curatively intended surgery lacks adequate methods for timely detection of recurrence. Therefore, several molecules have been analyzed as predictors of recurrence or early detection of PDAC. Enhanced understanding of molecular tumorigenesis and treatment response triggered the identification of novel biomarkers as predictors for response to conventional chemotherapy or targeted therapy. In conclusion, progress has been made especially in the prediction of therapy response with biomarkers. The use of molecules for early detection and recurrence of PDAC is still at an early stage, but there are promising approaches in noninvasive biomarkers, composite panels and scores that can already ameliorate the current clinical practice. The present review summarizes the current state of research on biomarkers for diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
|
3
|
Huerta M, Roselló S, Sabater L, Ferrer A, Tarazona N, Roda D, Gambardella V, Alfaro-Cervelló C, Garcés-Albir M, Cervantes A, Ibarrola-Villava M. Circulating Tumor DNA Detection by Digital-Droplet PCR in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13050994. [PMID: 33673558 PMCID: PMC7956845 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13050994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Pancreatic cancer is a digestive tumor that is most difficult to treat and carries one of the worst prognoses. The anatomical location of the pancreas makes it very difficult to obtain enough tumor material to establish a molecular diagnosis, so knowing the biology of this tumor and implementing new targeted-therapies is still a pending issue. The use of liquid biopsy, a blood sample test to detect circulating-tumor DNA fragments (ctDNA), is key to overcoming this difficulty and improving the evolution of this tumor. Liquid biopsies are equally representative of the tissue from which they come and allow relevant molecular and diagnostic information to be obtained in a faster and less invasive way. One challenge related to ctDNA is the lack of consistency in the study design. Moreover, ctDNA accounts for only a small percentage of the total cell-free circulating DNA and prior knowledge about particular mutations is usually required. Thus, our aim was to understand the current role and future perspectives of ctDNA in pancreatic cancer using digital-droplet PCR technology. Abstract Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most devastating malignant tumors, being the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Researchers and clinicians are endeavoring to develop strategies for the early detection of the disease and the improvement of treatment results. Adequate biopsy is still challenging because of the pancreas’s poor anatomic location. Recently, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be identified as a liquid biopsy tool with huge potential as a non-invasive biomarker in early diagnosis, prognosis and management of PC. ctDNA is released from apoptotic and necrotic cancer cells, as well as from living tumor cells and even circulating tumor cells, and it can reveal genetic and epigenetic alterations with tumor-specific and individual mutation and methylation profiles. However, ctDNA sensibility remains a limitation and the accuracy of ctDNA as a biomarker for PC is relatively low and cannot be currently used as a screening or diagnostic tool. Increasing evidence suggests that ctDNA is an interesting biomarker for predictive or prognosis studies, evaluating minimal residual disease, longitudinal follow-up and treatment management. Promising results have been published and therefore the objective of our review is to understand the current role and the future perspectives of ctDNA in PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marisol Huerta
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (M.H.); (S.R.); (A.F.); (N.T.); (D.R.); (V.G.); (A.C.)
| | - Susana Roselló
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (M.H.); (S.R.); (A.F.); (N.T.); (D.R.); (V.G.); (A.C.)
- CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Unit, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Sabater
- Liver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, University of Valencia, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (L.S.); (M.G.-A.)
| | - Ana Ferrer
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (M.H.); (S.R.); (A.F.); (N.T.); (D.R.); (V.G.); (A.C.)
- CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Unit, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Noelia Tarazona
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (M.H.); (S.R.); (A.F.); (N.T.); (D.R.); (V.G.); (A.C.)
- CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Unit, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Desamparados Roda
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (M.H.); (S.R.); (A.F.); (N.T.); (D.R.); (V.G.); (A.C.)
- CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Unit, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Valentina Gambardella
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (M.H.); (S.R.); (A.F.); (N.T.); (D.R.); (V.G.); (A.C.)
- CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Unit, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Clara Alfaro-Cervelló
- Department of Pathology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Marina Garcés-Albir
- Liver, Biliary and Pancreatic Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario of Valencia, University of Valencia, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (L.S.); (M.G.-A.)
| | - Andrés Cervantes
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (M.H.); (S.R.); (A.F.); (N.T.); (D.R.); (V.G.); (A.C.)
- CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Unit, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
| | - Maider Ibarrola-Villava
- Department of Medical Oncology, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain; (M.H.); (S.R.); (A.F.); (N.T.); (D.R.); (V.G.); (A.C.)
- CIBERONC, Medical Oncology Unit, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-963-862-894
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grunvald MW, Jacobson RA, Kuzel TM, Pappas SG, Masood A. Current Status of Circulating Tumor DNA Liquid Biopsy in Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E7651. [PMID: 33081107 PMCID: PMC7589736 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a challenging disease with a low 5-year survival rate. There are areas for improvement in the tools used for screening, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment selection, and assessing treatment response. Liquid biopsy, particularly cell free DNA liquid biopsy, has shown promise as an adjunct to our standard care for pancreatic cancer patients, but has not yet been universally adopted into regular use by clinicians. In this publication, we aim to review cfDNA liquid biopsy in pancreatic cancer with an emphasis on current techniques, clinical utility, and areas of active investigation. We feel that researchers and clinicians alike should be familiar with this exciting modality as it gains increasing importance in the care of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miles W. Grunvald
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (M.W.G.); (R.A.J.); (S.G.P.)
| | - Richard A. Jacobson
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (M.W.G.); (R.A.J.); (S.G.P.)
| | - Timothy M. Kuzel
- Division of Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
| | - Sam G. Pappas
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (M.W.G.); (R.A.J.); (S.G.P.)
| | - Ashiq Masood
- Division of Hematology/Oncology and Cell Therapy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA;
- Rush Precision Oncology Program, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moving the Target on the Optimal Adjuvant Strategy for Resected Pancreatic Cancers: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12030534. [PMID: 32110977 PMCID: PMC7139837 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Combination regimens have shown superiority over single agents in the adjuvant treatment of resected pancreatic cancer (PC), but there are no data supporting definition of the best regimen. This work aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of mFOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine+capecitabine, and gemcitabine+nab/paclitaxel in PC patients. A meta-analysis was performed for direct comparison between trials comparing combination regimens and gemcitabine monotherapy. Subsequently, an indirect comparison was made between trials investigating the efficacy and safety of mFOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine+capecitabine, and gemcitabine+nab/paclitaxel because of the same control arm (gemcitabine). A total of three studies met the selection criteria and were included in our indirect comparison. Indirect comparisons for efficacy outcomes showed a benefit in terms of DFS (disease-free survival)/EFS (event-free survival)/RFS (relapse-free survival) for both mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine+capecitabine (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52–0.91) and versus gemcitabine+nab/paclitaxel (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50–0.90). No significant advantage was registered for OS (overall survival). Indirect comparisons for safety showed an increase in terms of G3-5 AEs (with the exception of neutropenia) for mFOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine+capecitabine (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.50), while no significant differences were observed versus gemcitabine+nab/paclitaxel. According to our results, mFOLFIRINOX is feasible and manageable and could represent a first option for fit PC resected patients.
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee B, Lipton L, Cohen J, Tie J, Javed AA, Li L, Goldstein D, Burge M, Cooray P, Nagrial A, Tebbutt NC, Thomson B, Nikfarjam M, Harris M, Haydon A, Lawrence B, Tai DWM, Simons K, Lennon AM, Wolfgang CL, Tomasetti C, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Gibbs P. Circulating tumor DNA as a potential marker of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit following surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1472-1478. [PMID: 31250894 PMCID: PMC6771221 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In early-stage pancreatic cancer, there are currently no biomarkers to guide selection of therapeutic options. This prospective biomarker trial evaluated the feasibility and potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis to inform adjuvant therapy decision making. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients considered by the multidisciplinary team to have resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Pre- and post-operative samples for ctDNA analysis were collected. PCR-based-SafeSeqS assays were used to identify mutations at codon 12, 13 and 61 of KRAS in the primary pancreatic tumor and to detect ctDNA. Results of ctDNA analysis were correlated with CA19-9, recurrence-free and overall survival (OS). Patient management was per standard of care, blinded to ctDNA data. RESULTS Of 112 patients consented pre-operatively, 81 (72%) underwent resection. KRAS mutations were identified in 91% (38/42) of available tumor samples. Of available plasma samples (N = 42), KRAS mutated ctDNA was detected in 62% (23/37) pre-operative and 37% (13/35) post-operative cases. At a median follow-up of 38.4 months, ctDNA detection in the pre-operative setting was associated with inferior recurrence-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 4.1; P = 0.002)] and OS (HR 4.1; P = 0.015). Detectable ctDNA following curative intent resection was associated with inferior RFS (HR 5.4; P < 0.0001) and OS (HR 4.0; P = 0.003). Recurrence occurred in 13/13 (100%) patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively, including in seven that received gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION ctDNA studies in localized pancreatic cancer are challenging, with a substantial number of patients not able to undergo resection, not having sufficient tumor tissue for analysis or not completing per protocol sample collection. ctDNA analysis, pre- and/or post-surgery, is a promising prognostic marker. Studies of ctDNA guided therapy are justified, including of treatment intensification strategies for patients with detectable ctDNA post-operatively who appear at very high risk of recurrence despite gemcitabine-based adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Lee
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
| | - L Lipton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Australia
| | - J Cohen
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - J Tie
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne
| | - A A Javed
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - L Li
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - D Goldstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick
| | - M Burge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane
| | - P Cooray
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne
| | - A Nagrial
- Department of Medical Oncology, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Westmead
| | - N C Tebbutt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Melbourne
| | - B Thomson
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne
| | - M Nikfarjam
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Melbourne
| | - M Harris
- Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton
| | - A Haydon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - B Lawrence
- Department of Medical Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - D W M Tai
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
| | - K Simons
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Centre for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A M Lennon
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - C L Wolfgang
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - C Tomasetti
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - N Papadopoulos
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - K W Kinzler
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - B Vogelstein
- Ludwig Centre and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Centre, Baltimore
| | - P Gibbs
- Division of Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne; Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loft M, Lee B, Tie J, Gibbs P. Clinical Applications of Circulating Tumour DNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. J Pers Med 2019; 9:jpm9030037. [PMID: 31323810 PMCID: PMC6789869 DOI: 10.3390/jpm9030037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains one of the most aggressive cancers with an ongoing dismal survival rate despite some recent advances in treatment options. This is largely due to the typically late presentation and limited effective therapeutic options in advanced disease. There are numerous circulating biomarkers that have potential clinical application as tumour markers, including circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumour cells (CTCs), cell-free RNA (cfRNA), exosomes and circulating tumour proteins. This review will focus on the development of ctDNA as a non-invasive liquid biopsy, with its high sensitivity and specificity having potential clinical applications in pancreatic cancer. These include a role in screening, prognostication via the detection of minimal residual disease, early detection of recurrence, and for patients with advanced disease; tumour genotyping and monitoring treatment response. Prospective randomised adjuvant clinical trials are currently underway, exploring the impact of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy decisions. In this review, we provide perspectives on the current literature and considerations of future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Loft
- Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville 3050, Australia.
- Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia.
| | - Belinda Lee
- Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville 3050, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville 3050, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray 3011, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville 3050, Australia
- Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray 3011, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Samandari M, Julia MG, Rice A, Chronopoulos A, Del Rio Hernandez AE. Liquid biopsies for management of pancreatic cancer. Transl Res 2018; 201:98-127. [PMID: 30118658 DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2018.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 06/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the main causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It is asymptomatic at an early stage, and most diagnosis occurs when the disease is already at a late stage, by which time the tumor is nonresectable. In order to increase the overall survival of patients with pancreatic cancer, as well as to decrease the cancer burden, it is necessary to perform early diagnosis, prognosis stratifications and cancer monitoring using accurate, minimally invasive, and cost-effective methods. Liquid biopsies seek to detect tumor-associated biomarkers in a variety of extractable body fluids and can help to monitor treatment response and disease progression, and even predict patient outcome. In patients with pancreatic cancer, tumor-derived materials, primarily circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells and exosomes, are being studied for inclusion in the management of the disease. This review focuses on describing the biology of these biomarkers, methods for their enrichment and detection, as well as their potential for clinical application. Moreover, we discuss the future direction of liquid biopsies and introduce how they can be exploited toward point of care personalized medicine for the management of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamadmahdi Samandari
- Cellular and Molecular Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - María Gil Julia
- Cellular and Molecular Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Alistair Rice
- Cellular and Molecular Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Antonios Chronopoulos
- Cellular and Molecular Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
| | - Armando E Del Rio Hernandez
- Cellular and Molecular Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|