1
|
Willis C, Bauer H, Au TH, Menon J, Unni S, Tran D, Rivers Z, Akerley W, Schabath MB, Badin F, Sekhon A, Patel M, Xia B, Gustafson B, Villano JL, Thomas JM, Lubinga SJ, Cantrell MA, Brixner D, Stenehjem D. Real-world survival analysis by tumor mutational burden in non-small cell lung cancer: a multisite U.S. study. Oncotarget 2022; 13:257-270. [PMID: 35111281 PMCID: PMC8803368 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a potential biomarker to predict tumor response to immuno-oncology agents in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS A multi-site cohort study evaluated patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between 2012 and 2019 who had received comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and any NSCLC-related treatment at 9 U.S. cancer centers. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with TMB <10 and TMB ≥10. RESULTS Among the 667 patients with CGP results, most patients received CGP from Foundation Medicine (64%) or Caris (20%). Patients with TMB ≥10 (vs. TMB <10) were associated with a positive smoking history. TMB was associated with ALK (p = 0.01), EGFR (p < 0.01), and TP53 (p < 0.05) alterations. TMB >10 showed a significant association towards longer overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.88, p = 0.02) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.21-0.85, p = 0.02) in patients treated with first-line immunotherapy and tested by Foundation Medicine or Caris at treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS TMB levels greater than or equal to 10 mut/Mb, when tested by Foundation Medicine or Caris at treatment initiation, were significantly associated with improved OS and PFS among patients treated with first-line immunotherapy-containing regimens. Additional prospective research is warranted to validate this biomarker along with PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Willis
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Hillevi Bauer
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Trang H. Au
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jyothi Menon
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sudhir Unni
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Dao Tran
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| | - Zachary Rivers
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| | - Wallace Akerley
- Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Matthew B. Schabath
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Firas Badin
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Baptist Health Medical Group, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Ashley Sekhon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Malini Patel
- Division of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Bing Xia
- Department of Medicine, Kenneth Norris Jr. Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Beth Gustafson
- Precision Oncology Program, Saint Luke’s Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - John L. Villano
- Department of Internal Medicine, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Solomon J. Lubinga
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | - Diana Brixner
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David Stenehjem
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Willis C, Fiander M, Tran D, Korytowsky B, Thomas JM, Calderon F, Zyczynski TM, Brixner D, Stenehjem DD. Tumor mutational burden in lung cancer: a systematic literature review. Oncotarget 2019; 10:6604-6622. [PMID: 31762941 PMCID: PMC6859921 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.27287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the association of tumor mutational burden (TMB) with clinical outcomes, other biomarkers and patient/disease characteristics in patients receiving therapy for lung cancer. Results: In total, 4,303 publications were identified; 81 publications were included. The majority of publications assessing clinical efficacy of immunotherapy reported an association with high TMB, particularly when assessing progression-free survival and objective response rate. High TMB was consistently associated with TP53 alterations, and negatively associated with EGFR mutations. High TMB was also associated with smoking, squamous cell non-small cell lung carcinoma, and being male. Methods: A systematic literature review based upon an a priori protocol was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane methodologies. Searches were conducted in EMBASE, SCOPUS, Ovid MEDLINE®, and Emcare (from January 2012 until April 2018) and in two clinical trial registries. Conference abstracts were identified in EMBASE, and in targeted searches of recent major conference proceedings (from January 2016 until April 2018). Publications reporting data in patients receiving therapy for lung cancer that reported TMB and its association with clinical efficacy, or with other biomarkers or patient/disease characteristics, were included. Results are presented descriptively. Conclusion: This systematic literature review identified several clinical outcomes, biomarkers, and patient/disease characteristics associated with high TMB, and highlights the need for standardized definitions and testing practices. Further studies using standardized methodology are required to inform treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Connor Willis
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Michelle Fiander
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Dao Tran
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Diana Brixner
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David D. Stenehjem
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapies have revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Yet, only a small subset of patients will benefit from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade. PD-L1 tumor cell expression is the only approved biomarker at present. Tumor mutational burden and other emerging biomarkers should improve patient selection. Combination therapy approaches with chemotherapy or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 blockade may increase the proportion of patients who benefit from immunotherapy. Although use of immunotherapy in lung cancers with targetable oncogenes has not been particularly successful, the benefit of PD-(L)1 inhibitors in early-stage disease is emerging. This review briefly describes the evolution of the clinical development and future directions of PD-(L)1 blockade in patients with lung cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando C. Santini
- Division of Medical Oncology, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Matthew D. Hellmann
- Thoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aggen DH, Drake CG. Biomarkers for immunotherapy in bladder cancer: a moving target. J Immunother Cancer 2017; 5:94. [PMID: 29157296 PMCID: PMC5697433 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-017-0299-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment options for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remained relative unchanged over the last 30 years with combination chemotherapy as the mainstay of treatment. Within the last year the landscape for mUC has seismically shifted following the approval of five therapies targeting the programmed cell death protein (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis. Notably, the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab demonstrated improved OS relative to chemotherapy in a randomized phase III study for second line treatment of mUC; this level 1 evidence led to approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The PD-1 antibody nivolumab also demonstrated an overall survival benefit, in this case in comparison to historical controls. Similarly, antibodies targeting PD-L1 including atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab have now received accelerated approval from the FDA as second line treatments for mUC, with durable response lasting more than 1 year in some patients. Some of these agents are approved in the first line setting as well - based on single-arm phase II studies atezolizumab and pembrolizumab received accelerated approval for first-line treatment of cisplatin ineligible patients. Despite these multiple approvals, the development of clinically useful biomarkers to determine the optimal treatment for patients remains somewhat elusive. In this review, we examine key clinical trial results with anti-PD1/PD-L1 antibodies and discuss progress towards developing novel biomarkers beyond PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H. Aggen
- New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, Hematology/Oncology, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 6GN-435, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Charles G. Drake
- New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, Hematology/Oncology, 177 Fort Washington Avenue, 6GN-435, New York, NY 10032 USA
| |
Collapse
|